• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Netanyahu: “It’s not militants. It’s not Islam. It’s militant Islam.”

Sep 30, 2014 10:33 pm By Robert Spencer

That statement from Netanyahu seems to mean that the threat is not coming from militants who have nothing to do with Islam, as Obama and Kerry and Cameron and May and all the rest of the witless dupes in Western leadership positions would have us believe, and it is not coming from every last Muslim, but it is coming from militant Muslims who use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and supremacism. In any case, it is closer to the truth than any formulation any other non-Muslim leader has used.

This is a brilliant speech. Watch or read it all. Note what the Prime Minister says about the congruity between the Islamic State and Hamas: “ISIS and Hamas are branches of the same poisonous tree. ISIS and Hamas share a fanatical creed, which they both seek to impose well beyond the territory under their control.” The State Department, clinging to its willful ignorance, has contradicted this, but Netanyahu is right: they do share the same creed, and the same goals. So also does what Netanyahu calls “the Islamic State of Iran. For 35 years, Iran has relentlessly pursued the global mission which was set forth by its founding ruler, Ayatollah Khomeini, in these words: We will export our revolution to the entire world.”

If only every world leader spoke with this much clarity and honesty about the threat.

“Full text of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s UN speech,” Jerusalem Post, September 29, 2014:

The following is the text of the speech that Prime Minister Netanyahu gave to the UN on September 29 2014.

[Transcription] Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Speech at the United Nations General Assembly September 29, 2014 Thank you, Mr. President, Distinguished delegates, I come here from Jerusalem to speak on behalf of my people, the people of Israel. I’ve come here to speak about the dangers we face and about the opportunities we see. I’ve come here to expose the brazen lies spoken from this very podium against my country and against the brave soldiers who defend it.

Ladies and Gentlemen, The people of Israel pray for peace.

But our hopes and the world’s hope for peace are in danger. Because everywhere we look, militant Islam is on the march.

It’s not militants. It’s not Islam. It’s militant Islam. Typically, its first victims are other Muslims, but it spares no one. Christians, Jews, Yazidis, Kurds – no creed, no faith, no ethnic group is beyond its sights. And it’s rapidly spreading in every part of the world. You know the famous American saying: “All politics is local”? For the militant Islamists, “All politics is global.” Because their ultimate goal is to dominate the world.

Now, that threat might seem exaggerated to some, since it starts out small, like a cancer that attacks a particular part of the body. But left unchecked, the cancer grows, metastasizing over wider and wider areas. To protect the peace and security of the world, we must remove this cancer before it’s too late. Last week, many of the countries represented here rightly applauded President Obama for leading the effort to confront ISIS. And yet weeks before, some of these same countries, the same countries that now support confronting ISIS, opposed Israel for confronting Hamas. They evidently don’t understand that ISIS and Hamas are branches of the same poisonous tree.

ISIS and Hamas share a fanatical creed, which they both seek to impose well beyond the territory under their control.

Listen to ISIS’s self-declared caliph,Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi. This is what he said two months ago: A day will soon come when the Muslim will walk everywhere as a master… The Muslims will cause the world to hear and understand the meaning of terrorism… and destroy the idol of democracy. Now listen to Khaled Meshaal, the leader of Hamas. He proclaims a similar vision of the future: We say this to the West… By Allah you will be defeated. Tomorrow our nation will sit on the throne of the world.

As Hamas’s charter makes clear, Hamas’s immediate goal is to destroy Israel. But Hamas has a broader objective. They also want a caliphate. Hamas shares the global ambitions of its fellow militant Islamists. That’s why its supporters wildly cheered in the streets of Gaza as thousands of Americans were murdered on 9/11. And that’s why its leaders condemned the United States for killing Osama Bin Laden, whom they praised as a holy warrior.

So when it comes to their ultimate goals, Hamas is ISIS and ISIS is Hamas.

And what they share in common, all militant Islamists share in common: • Boko Haram in Nigeria; • Ash-Shabab in Somalia; • Hezbollah in Lebanon; • An-Nusrah in Syria; • The Mahdi Army in Iraq; • And the Al-Qaeda branches in Yemen, Libya, the Philippines, India and elsewhere.

Some are radical Sunnis, some are radical Shi’ites. Some want to restore a pre-medieval caliphate from the 7th century. Others want to trigger the apocalyptic return of an imam from the 9th century. They operate in different lands, they target different victims and they even kill each other in their quest for supremacy. But they all share a fanatic ideology. They all seek to create ever expanding enclaves of militant Islam where there is no freedom and no tolerance – Where women are treated as chattel, Christians are decimated, and minorities are subjugated, sometimes given the stark choice: convert or die. For them, anyone can be an infidel, including fellow Muslims.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Militant Islam’s ambition to dominate the world seems mad. But so too did the global ambitions of another fanatic ideology that swept to power eight decades ago.

The Nazis believed in a master race. The militant Islamists believe in a master faith. They just disagree about who among them will be the master… of the master faith. That’s what they truly disagree about. Therefore, the question before us is whether militant Islam will have the power to realize its unbridled ambitions.

There is one place where that could soon happen: The Islamic State of Iran. For 35 years, Iran has relentlessly pursued the global mission which was set forth by its founding ruler, Ayatollah Khomeini, in these words: We will export our revolution to the entire world.

Until the cry “There is no God but Allah” will echo throughout the world over… And ever since, the regime’s brutal enforcers, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, have done exactly that.

Listen to its current commander, General Muhammad Ali Ja’afari. And he clearly stated this goal. He said: Our Imam did not limit the Islamic Revolution to this country… Our duty is to prepare the way for an Islamic world government… Iran’s President Rouhani stood here last week, and shed crocodile tears over what he called “the globalization of terrorism.” Maybe he should spare us those phony tears and have a word instead with the commanders of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. He could ask them to call off Iran’s global terror campaign, which has included attacks in two dozen countries on five continents since 2011 alone. To say that Iran doesn’t practice terrorism is like saying Derek Jeter never played shortstop for the New York Yankees.

This bemoaning of the Iranian president of the spread of terrorism has got to be one of history’s greatest displays of doubletalk.

Now, Some still argue that Iran’s global terror campaign, its subversion of countries throughout the Middle East and well beyond the Middle East, some argue that this is the work of the extremists. They say things are changing. They point to last year’s elections in Iran. They claim that Iran’s smooth talking President and Foreign Minister, they’ve changed not only the tone of Iran’s foreign policy but also its substance. They believe Rouhani and Zarif genuinely want to reconcile with the West, that they’ve abandoned the global mission of the Islamic Revolution.

Really? So let’s look at what Foreign Minister Zarif wrote in his book just a few years ago: We have a fundamental problem with the West, and especially with America. This is because we are heirs to a global mission, which is tied to our raison d’etre… A global mission which is tied to our very reason of being.

And then Zarif asks a question, I think an interesting one. He says: How come Malaysia [he’s referring to an overwhelmingly Muslim country] – how come Malaysia doesn’t have similar problems? And he answers: Because Malaysia is not trying to change the international order.

That’s your moderate. So don’t be fooled by Iran’s manipulative charm offensive. It’s designed for one purpose, and for one purpose only: To lift the sanctions and remove the obstacles to Iran’s path to the bomb. The Islamic Republic is now trying to bamboozle its way to an agreement that will remove the sanctions it still faces, and leave it with the capacity of thousands of centrifuges to enrich uranium. This would effectively cement Iran’s place as a threshold military nuclear power. In the future, at a time of its choosing, Iran, the world’s most dangerous state in the world’s most dangerous region, would obtain the world’s most dangerous weapons.

Allowing that to happen would pose the gravest threat to us all. It’s one thing to confront militant Islamists on pick-up trucks, armed with Kalashnikov rifles. It’s another thing to confront militant Islamists armed with weapons of mass destruction. I remember that last year, everyone here was rightly concerned about the chemical weapons in Syria, including the possibility that they would fall into the hands of terrorists. That didn’t happen. And President Obama deserves great credit for leading the diplomatic effort to dismantle virtually all of Syria’s chemical weapons capability. Imagine how much more dangerous the Islamic State, ISIS, would be if it possessed chemical weapons. Now imagine how much more dangerous the Islamic state of Iran would be if it possessed nuclear weapons. Ladies and Gentlemen, Would you let ISIS enrich uranium? Would you let ISIS build a heavy water reactor? Would you let ISIS develop intercontinental ballistic missiles? Of course you wouldn’t. Then you mustn’t let the Islamic State of Iran do those things either.

Because here’s what will happen: Once Iran produces atomic bombs, all the charm and all the smiles will suddenly disappear. They’ll just vanish. It’s then that the ayatollahs will show their true face and unleash their aggressive fanaticism on the entire world. There is only one responsible course of action to address this threat: Iran’s nuclear military capabilities must be fully dismantled. Make no mistake – ISIS must be defeated. But to defeat ISIS and leave Iran as a threshold nuclear power is to win the battle and lose the war.

To defeat ISIS and leave Iran as a threshold nuclear power is to win the battle and lose the war.

Ladies and Gentlemen, The fight against militant Islam is indivisible. When militant Islam succeeds anywhere, it’s emboldened everywhere. When it suffers a blow in one place, it’s set back in every place. That’s why Israel’s fight against Hamas is not just our fight. It’s your fight. Israel is fighting a fanaticism today that your countries may be forced to fight tomorrow.

For 50 days this past summer, Hamas fired thousands of rockets at Israel, many of them supplied by Iran. I want you to think about what your countries would do if thousands of rockets were fired at your cities. Imagine millions of your citizens having seconds at most to scramble to bomb shelters, day after day. You wouldn’t let terrorists fire rockets at your cities with impunity. Nor would you let terrorists dig dozens of terror tunnels under your borders to infiltrate your towns in order to murder and kidnap your citizens. Israel justly defended itself against both rocket attacks and terror tunnels. Yet Israel also faced another challenge. We faced a propaganda war. Because, in an attempt to win the world’s sympathy, Hamas cynically used Palestinian civilians as human shields. It used schools, not just schools – UN schools, private homes, mosques, even hospitals to store and fire rockets at Israel.

As Israel surgically struck at the rocket launchers and at the tunnels, Palestinian civilians were tragically but unintentionally killed. There are heartrending images that resulted, and these fueled libelous charges that Israel was deliberately targeting civilians.

We were not. We deeply regret every single civilian casualty. And the truth is this: Israel was doing everything to minimize Palestinian civilian casualties. Hamas was doing everything to maximize Israeli civilian casualties and Palestinian civilian casualties. Israel dropped flyers, made phone calls, sent text messages, broadcast warnings in Arabic on Palestinian television, always to enable Palestinian civilians to evacuate targeted areas.

No other country and no other army in history have gone to greater lengths to avoid casualties among the civilian population of their enemies. This concern for Palestinian life was all the more remarkable, given that Israeli civilians were being bombarded by rockets day after day, night after night. As their families were being rocketed by Hamas, Israel’s citizen army – the brave soldiers of the IDF, our young boys and girls – they upheld the highest moral values of any army in the world. Israel’s soldiers deserve not condemnation, but admiration. Admiration from decent people everywhere.

Now here’s what Hamas did: Hamas embedded its missile batteries in residential areas and told Palestinians to ignore Israel’s warnings to leave. And just in case people didn’t get the message, they executed Palestinian civilians in Gaza who dared to protest.

No less reprehensible, Hamas deliberately placed its rockets where Palestinian children live and play. Let me show you a photograph. It was taken by a France 24 crew during the recent conflict. It shows two Hamas rocket launchers, which were used to attack us. You see three children playing next to them. Hamas deliberately put its rockets in hundreds of residential areas like this. Hundreds of them.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is a war crime. And I say to President Abbas, these are the war crimes committed by your Hamas partners in the national unity government which you head and you are responsible for. And these are the real war crimes you should have investigated, or spoken out against from this podium last week.

Ladies and Gentlemen, As Israeli children huddled in bomb shelters and Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system knocked Hamas rockets out of the sky, the profound moral difference between Israel and Hamas couldn’t have been clearer: Israel was using its missiles to protect its children. Hamas was using its children to protect its missiles.

By investigating Israel rather than Hamas for war crimes, the UN Human Rights Council has betrayed its noble mission to protect the innocent. In fact, what it’s doing is to turn the laws of war upside-down. Israel, which took unprecedented steps to minimize civilian casualties, Israel is condemned. Hamas, which both targeted and hid behind civilians – that a double war crime – Hamas is given a pass.

The Human Rights Council is thus sending a clear message to terrorists everywhere: Use civilians as human shields. Use them again and again and again. You know why? Because sadly, it works.

By granting international legitimacy to the use of human shields, the UN’s Human Rights Council has thus become a Terrorist Rights Council, and it will have repercussions. It probably already has, about the use of civilians as human shields.

It’s not just our interest. It’s not just our values that are under attack. It’s your interests and your values.

Ladies and Gentlemen, We live in a world steeped in tyranny and terror, where gays are hanged from cranes in Tehran, political prisoners are executed in Gaza, young girls are abducted en masse in Nigeria and hundreds of thousands are butchered in Syria, Libya and Iraq. Yet nearly half, nearly half of the UN Human Rights Council’s resolutions focusing on a single country have been directed against Israel, the one true democracy in the Middle East – Israel. where issues are openly debated in a boisterous parliament, where human rights are protected by independent courts and where women, gays and minorities live in a genuinely free society.

The Human Rights… (that’s an oxymoron, the UN Human Rights Council, but I’ll use it just the same), the Council’s biased treatment of Israel is only one manifestation of the return of the world’s oldest prejudices. We hear mobs today in Europe call for the gassing of Jews. We hear some national leaders compare Israel to the Nazis. This is not a function of Israel’s policies. It’s a function of diseased minds. And that disease has a name. It’s called anti-Semitism.

It is now spreading in polite society, where it masquerades as legitimate criticism of Israel. For centuries the Jewish people have been demonized with blood libels and charges of deicide. Today, the Jewish state is demonized with the apartheid libel and charges of genocide. Genocide? In what moral universe does genocide include warning the enemy’s civilian population to get out of harm’s way? Or ensuring that they receive tons, tons of humanitarian aid each day, even as thousands of rockets are being fired at us? Or setting up a field hospital to aid for their wounded? Well, I suppose it’s the same moral universe where a man who wrote a dissertation of lies about the Holocaust, and who insists on a Palestine free of Jews, Judenrein, can stand at this podium and shamelessly accuse Israel of genocide and ethnic cleansing.

In the past, outrageous lies against the Jews were the precursors to the wholesale slaughter of our people.

But no more.

Today we, the Jewish people, have the power to defend ourselves. We will defend ourselves against our enemies on the battlefield. We will expose their lies against us in the court of public opinion. Israel will continue to stand proud and unbowed.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Despite the enormous challenges facing Israel, I believe we have an historic opportunity.

After decades of seeing Israel as their enemy, leading states in the Arab world increasingly recognize that together we and they face many of the same dangers: principally this means a nuclear-armed Iran and militant Islamist movements gaining ground in the Sunni world.

Our challenge is to transform these common interests to create a productive partnership. One that would build a more secure, peaceful and prosperous Middle East.

Together we can strengthen regional security. We can advance projects in water, agriculture, in transportation, in health, in energy, in so many fields.

I believe the partnership between us can also help facilitate peace between Israel and the Palestinians. Many have long assumed that an Israeli-Palestinian peace can help facilitate a broader rapprochement between Israel and the Arab World. But these days I think it may work the other way around: Namely that a broader rapprochement between Israel and the Arab world may help facilitate an Israeli-Palestinian peace.

And therefore, to achieve that peace, we must look not only to Jerusalem and Ramallah, but also to Cairo, to Amman, Abu Dhabi, Riyadh and elsewhere. I believe peace can be realized with the active involvement of Arab countries, those that are willing to provide political, material and other indispensable support. I’m ready to make a historic compromise, not because Israel is occupying a foreign land. The people of Israel are not occupiers in the Land of Israel. History, archeology and common sense all make clear that we have had a singular attachment to this land for over 3,000 years.

I want peace because I want to create a better future for my people. But it must be a genuine peace, one that is anchored in mutual recognition and enduring security arrangements, rock solid security arrangements on the ground. Because you see, Israel’s withdrawals from Lebanon and Gaza created two militant Islamic enclaves on our borders from which tens of thousands of rockets have been fired at Israel.

These sobering experiences heighten Israel’s security concerns regarding potential territorial concessions in the future. Those security concerns are even greater today. Just look around you.

The Middle East is in chaos. States are disintegrating. Militant Islamists are filling the void.

Israel cannot have territories from which it withdraws taken over by Islamic militants yet again, as happened in Gaza and Lebanon. That would place the likes of ISIS within mortar range – a few miles – of 80% of our population.

Think about that. The distance between the 1967 lines and the suburbs of Tel Aviv is like the distance between the UN building here and Times Square. Israel’s a tiny country. That’s why in any peace agreement, which will obviously necessitate a territorial compromise, I will always insist that Israel be able to defend itself by itself against any threat. Yet despite all that has happened, some still don’t take Israel’s security concerns seriously. But I do, and I always will. Because, as Prime Minister of Israel, I am entrusted with the awesome responsibility of ensuring the future of the Jewish people and the future of the Jewish state.

And no matter what pressure is brought to bear, I will never waver in fulfilling that responsibility.

I believe that with a fresh approach from our neighbors, we can advance peace despite the difficulties we face.

In Israel, we have a record of making the impossible possible. We’ve made a desolate land flourish. And with very few natural resources, we have used the fertile minds of our people to turn Israel into a global center of technology and innovation.

Peace, of course, would enable Israel to realize its full potential and to bring a promising future not only for our people, not only for the Palestinian people, but for many, many others in our region.

But the old template for peace must be updated. It must take into account new realities and new roles and responsibilities for our Arab neighbors. Ladies and Gentlemen, There is a new Middle East. It presents new dangers, but also new opportunities. Israel is prepared to work with Arab partners and the international community to confront those dangers and to seize those opportunities. Together we must recognize the global threat of militant Islam, the primacy of dismantling Iran’s nuclear weapons capability and the indispensable role of Arab states in advancing peace with the Palestinians.

All this may fly in the face of conventional wisdom, but it’s the truth. And the truth must always be spoken, especially here, in the United Nations.

Isaiah, our great prophet of peace, taught us nearly 3,000 years ago in Jerusalem to speak truth to power. לְמַעַן צִיּוֹן לֹא אֶחֱשֶׁה וּלְמַעַן יְרוּשָׁלִַם לֹא אֶשְׁקוֹט עַד-יֵצֵא כַּנֹּגַהּ צִדְקָהּ וִישׁוּעָתָהּ כְּלַפִּיד יִבְעָר.

For the sake of Zion, I will not be silent.

For the sake of Jerusalem, I will not be still.

Until her justice shines bright, And her salvation glows like a flaming torch.

Ladies and Gentlemen, Let’s light a torch of truth and justice to safeguard our common future.

Thank you.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Hamas, Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, Daesh), Israel, Jihad doctrine, United Nations


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Tradewinds says

    Sep 30, 2014 at 11:15 pm

    Well, it is Islam. Qualifying it with “militant” is just wrong. Islam is inherently militant, inherently radical, inherently extremist. These qualifiers are redundant and ridiculous. Why can’t anyone just say, “IT’S FRICKIN’ ISLAM!”

    • Champ says

      Sep 30, 2014 at 11:26 pm

      Bravo, Tradewinds!!

    • Frank says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 5:18 am

      You’re so right!

    • adjudicator1776 says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 6:33 am

      There are many, who tell it like it is such as Andrew McCarthy and Pam Gellar. Too bad idiotic Obama, Kerry, Clinton et al. can’t and won’t. After all, Obama was raised in Indonesia and was registered in private school with the stated religion of “Islam”. If freedom loving countries don’t wake up to the growing threat of Islam and its central goal of a caliphate, we will be facing WWIII.

      • Tradewinds says

        Oct 1, 2014 at 8:47 am

        Here’s what Obama recently said on 60 minutes:

        “Obama said in an interview airing Sunday evening on “60 Minutes.” “We’ve got to get Arab and Muslim leaders to say very clearly, ‘These folks do not represent us. They do not represent Islam.’”

        Hah! Good Luck with getting the Arab and Muslim leaders to say that!! I won’t stay up at night waiting.

      • wildjew says

        Oct 1, 2014 at 10:22 am

        I think you are mistaken about McCarthy unless he has changed. McCarthy disagrees with Spencer. McCarthy clings to the Islamism / Islamist terminology Daniel Pipes is well-known for. As much as I appreciate Andrew McCarthy, he does not want to believe Islamic State savages and other like-minded devout Muslims speak for Islam.

    • Mirren10 says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 6:37 am

      Geert Wilders did.

      • Tradewinds says

        Oct 1, 2014 at 8:45 am

        You’re right. Geert puts the blame where it belongs – on Islam. As did Oriana Fallaci. None of this “militant/radical/extremist ” PC bullsh**.

        • wildjew says

          Oct 1, 2014 at 10:24 am

          Right but Andrew McCarthy does not. Have you seen Wilders or Spencer on Fox News lately? I haven’t. I see Walid Phares and Andrew McCarthy.

    • Mo says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 11:51 am

      @ Tradewinds

      “Well, it is Islam. Qualifying it with “militant” is just wrong. Islam is inherently militant, inherently radical, inherently extremist. These qualifiers are redundant and ridiculous. Why can’t anyone just say, “IT’S FRICKIN’ ISLAM!””

      Yes, indeed. That was my reaction as well. In fact, I was watching the speech and turned it off when I heard this. I’m sick of hearing it.

      But, I suppose when you are a politician speaking publicly, you still need to do what you can to be diplomatic. I hate it, but I can somewhat understand why he worded it that way.

      I just… personally, cannot bear to hear it any longer!

      • Tradewinds says

        Oct 1, 2014 at 2:08 pm

        Agree, Mo. I can’t either.

    • Oceanside says

      Oct 2, 2014 at 11:45 am

      Could not agree more. There is no way to remove the “militant” from Islam–unless the Qur’an, Hadith, and Sira disappear.

  2. Rebecca says

    Sep 30, 2014 at 11:32 pm

    It’s a beautiful speech.
    Spoken in honesty, conviction, and passion. Netanyahu shows the world the difference between Israel and ALL of the countries that surround it. It is a tiny, special country, of morality and values and you can see those convictions shining through his words.

  3. Beagle says

    Sep 30, 2014 at 11:51 pm

    Charles Lane of the Washington Post said Netanyahu was incorrect because some groups are Shia and Some are Sunnis. Yet here again, this time in print, I see Netanyahu mentioned the sectarian divisions. One might assume a professional reporter would not miss that. One would be wrong

  4. Beagle says

    Sep 30, 2014 at 11:59 pm

    There are. Unlike Muslims they are less likely to serve in the Israeli military than secular Jews. Even here in the US, with no particular knowledge of Judiasm, I know that.

    Not the answer you wanted probably, ‘Nordicelt’.

    Judaism, like Christianity or Buddhism, tends to produce pacifists when taken to extremes. Islam is the only major religion in which piety is expressed through violence. That’s why Hitler, ears perking up?, liked it so much.

  5. mortimer says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 12:35 am

    The House of Saud created this religious philosophy, taught it to all Saudi children and NOW they have created a rampaging monster.

    ISIS beheads and discriminates against women and disbelievers ; House of Saud beheads and discriminates against women and disbelievers .

    Do you see a difference? I don’t see a difference.

    • gravenimage says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 8:26 pm

      Mortimer wrote:

      The House of Saud created this religious philosophy…
      ……………………………

      Mortimer—with respect—the Saudis did not create this religious philosophy. This is absolutely mainstream Islam, and has been since long before the grasping House of Saud established themselves.

      You are absolutely right, though, that the Saudis are the biggest spreaders of Da’wa anywhere on the planet—building Mosques and Madrassas, publishing textbooks, and supplying Imams throughout the world, including in the West.

      They are also major sponsors of Jihad terror.

      You are also right that one of their biggest problems—as they see it—is that the Jihadist zeal that they have whipped up isn’t used against their own regime. They try to channel it against the “filthy Kuffar” whenever possible.

  6. cr says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 12:51 am

    Yes, Jewish extremist/militants exist, they have tried to blow up things and kill people. (I say tried, because they were stopped by Israeli authorities who cannot afford any such thing to ocurr ) contrary to the islamic ones are a very tiny collective of loons who have almost zero support, politically or otherwise and have spent their days in prison or under permanent surveillance.

    • voegelinian says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 12:22 pm

      “contrary to the islamic ones are a very tiny collective of loons who have almost zero support”

      I.e., should simply not be mentioned at all, in this context.

  7. Wakingwest says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 1:16 am

    Of all the countries in the world, it is us , the United States of America who should heed his warning the most and with the gravest concern . For now Israel may present itself to be the easiest, closest target to the jihadist nation of iran. But ultimately we still present the biggest prize for them. Their uncontained ire and glorious desire to destroy us is quickly approaching realization. They are used to acting with impunity and feel untouchable exploiting their innumerable proxies at their call, seemingly providing them the expectation of sufficient plausible deniability. But even when you assume traceability of radioactive isotopes, what good will it do to everything and everybody already destroyed?

  8. prman says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 1:24 am

    It’s a damn shame that Bibi cannot run for U. S. President. We need a man of his honesty, character and leadership—qualities sorely lacking in the present incumbent.

    • rabrooks says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 6:30 am

      Why not? He’s as American as oblahblah.

  9. citycat says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 2:33 am

    The militant and the peaceful are simply different branches.
    Peace?
    With Islam?
    No no, no way.
    Not while the vampiric Allah entity continues to feast.

  10. manuel-rafael says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 3:07 am

    Jihadi Genocide is the result of Fascist Moslem Imperialism, an attempt successful in large part due to the operational control of the Qatari War Machine; the Obama Emirate and the Moslem Brotherhood incidentally based in Doha and Washington D.C., as ISIS/IL/HAMAS/FATAH/AL’QAEDA/BOKO-HARAM and the “Moderate Rebels” trying one more time for an Arab Spring but this time with Air Support, provided by Qatar the Emirates and the Obama Subjugated stateless United States, in an attempt to overthrow Syria’s Al’Assad the body count has no limit only the Judeo and Christian Genocide only political expediency and the lies that are the gag ordered News Media Submission to the Islamic Caliphate that will destroy the Levant States Turkey, Pakistan and the Sultanate of Qatar, the U.S. has become a Janissary Vassar State and the “mercenary” proxy for the Total Jihad and mass murder of Syrians, Iraqis as well as the Ukrainian access point for the Balkans and Caucuses an Ottoman Reconquest of the Past.
    The Obama Betrayal of the Middle East, the Maghreb and the rest of that region cannot be justified, the invasion of Sovereign States, an ongoing Genocide disregarded as normal is a clear sign this is wrong on so many levels that it begins to repeat another time when the Third Reich used the “living space” narrative 1939-1945, but this a carnival of religious tyranny and only Moslems can be part, there is one thing missing the crematoria and the Ziklon B Pellets to expedite Jihadi Genocide.

  11. Cesar says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 4:17 am

    Great Speech of Mr. Natanyhachu, greetings.

  12. Cesar says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 4:20 am

    Great speech Mr. Natanyhachu !

  13. Robin Rosenblatt says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 4:33 am

    No it is not militant Islam. It is Islam = Islam is Evil. What part of Evil do you not understand? Islam enslaves your minds, your bodies and your souls. It must be destroyed. Islamic Culture is a Slave, Hate, Violent and War Culture.

    • Tradewinds says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 8:51 am

      “It must be destroyed.”

      I agree. For the good of the world this must happen. As Fascism and Nazism were destroyed. You don’t tolerate evil, as Thomas Mann expressed.

      “Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil.” – Thomas Mann

      • voegelinian says

        Oct 1, 2014 at 12:28 pm

        Fascism and Nazism weren’t destroyed; nations were bombed and millions of people were killed and then those nations were forcibly occupied and told how to manage their sociopolitical affairs. Also, Communism was allowed to thrive and swallow up millions of people and land in order to enslave them under their totalitarianism as a consolation prize for their brief aid against Hitler.

        At any rate, we need to keep this struggle pragmatic and not veer or lurch into the abstract or the existential.

        • Tradewinds says

          Oct 1, 2014 at 2:12 pm

          For all intents and purposes, both Fascism and Nazism were destroyed. They pose no threat whatsoever anymore. The same should be done to Islam.

        • voegelinian says

          Oct 1, 2014 at 3:34 pm

          My point is that the ideologies were destroyed (for all intents and purposes) pragmatically. It’s not pragmatically feasible to destroy Islam the same way, because its agents who put it into practice (both violently and stealthily) number 1.3 billion spread out in some 80 countries around the world, with millions settled deeply in Enemy Camp (i.e., among us). Furthermore, the majority of Muslims, hundreds of millions, don’t seem to be the soldiers of the trans-national Army waging war against us, even though some of us know they are just that. This is why Netanyahu hedges his language, and why even Geert Wilders speaks in asymptotic terms (although incrementally stronger than Netanyahu):

          …I want to emphasize that I am talking about Islam, not about Muslims. I always make a clear distinction between the people and the ideology, between Muslims and Islam. There are many moderate Muslims, but the political ideology of Islam is not moderate and has global ambitions. (2010 address in Berlin)

          And why in an op-ed in 2012, Wilders expressed concern about “provid[ing] insight and support to Muslims all over the world who wish to leave Islam” (as though such a viable demographic really existed for our #1 pragmatic concern, the defense of our societies from Muslims).

          How would we apply our WW2 success against Nazism & Fascism to this new problem? Bomb hundreds of millions of Muslims — including the millions inside our own lands and cities?

          The only way is total deportation. The West will get around to it, if only because Muslims will metastasize that horrifically in the coming decades. The only question is whether the West will do it before — or after — a few million of our men, women and children are mass-murdered by various terror attacks far worse and more hideously ingenious than 911.

        • Tradewinds says

          Oct 1, 2014 at 5:09 pm

          “…number 1.3 billion spread out in some 80 countries around the world, with millions settled deeply in Enemy Camp (i.e., among us)”

          Yes, you’re right, the Muslim polygamous/child bride over-breeding demographics separate the problem of Islam from the past problems of Fascism and Nazism which were only in Italy and Germany. Whereas Islam is worldwide.

          As Demographic Jihad is an Islam war tactic they know exactly what they’re doing by increasing their numbers through polygamy and child brides.

          “One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”

          – Houari (Mohamed) Boumedienne, President of Algeria, 1965 – 1978, in a 1974 speech at the UN.

          As for total deportation, we never should have let them in in the first place. Now how do we get them out before future jihads start mass-murdering the “infidels?”

  14. NDB says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 4:49 am

    I respectfully disagree with Mr Netanyahu… it is Islam.

    • Tradewinds says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 8:51 am

      Yep. No qualifiers required.

    • Jay Boo says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 12:29 pm

      Netanyahu had no other choice but to offer up that morsel.
      He is picking his battles wisely.

      • wildjew says

        Oct 1, 2014 at 12:39 pm

        Do you think if David son of Jesse were Israel’s prime minister he would offer up that morsel? Do you think if Jesus were Israel’s prime minister he would offer up that morsel?

        • Jay Boo says

          Oct 1, 2014 at 1:08 pm

          I don’t have time to watch the full video now but I did watch a third of it and I must agree with Roberts statement “This is a brilliant speech. Watch or read it all.” (which I will certainly do later)
          I would bet that most of the commenters who only focus on the ‘not Islam’ part have not even watched the video.
          Netanyahu would be smeared if he told the whole truth about Islam and his speech would fall on even more deaf ears.
          The UN General Assembly “can’t handle the truth”
          Netanyahu still manages to implicate Islam be association of its deeds.

        • citycat says

          Oct 2, 2014 at 2:37 am

          I think it is not so much offering a morsel, but letting out the truth in measured amounts.

        • John C. Barile says

          Oct 3, 2014 at 10:52 pm

          “Letting out the truth in measured amounts.” Exactly. There’s nothing amiss, no error in Bibi’s formulation.

  15. Dawid ben Haggai says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 4:59 am

    “The Last Day will not come until the Muslims fight the Jews… Until a tree says: Muslim, servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me . Come and kill him.” (Ahadiths:Book#6985 )
    These are Muhammad’s own words. Mr. Netanyahu believes things will ever change? The “prophet” said so. His words are from Allah himself, so the Muslimsbelieve.

  16. Jon says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 5:30 am

    That adjective ‘militant’ is doing mighty work, deflecting all the blame away from Islam. We usually have ‘it’s not Islam, it’s terrorists’ or ‘it’s not Islam, it’s extremist or militant Islamists’ etc. Perhaps there is a progression when we have a modifying adjective added to that big bad noun “ISLAM” rather than the noun itself replaced with another.

  17. Silvia says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 5:37 am

    Make no mistake – Netanyahu knows the truth, he knows this is Islam and that a religious war is happening allover the globe. He just can’t say it if he wants anyone to listen. He knows the world doesn’t want to admit it.

    • wildjew says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 12:40 pm

      How would we know if the prime minister knows the truth?

  18. Silvia says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 5:45 am

    It’s OK, let the Jew hater do what Jew haters have been doing for thousands of years – blame the Jews for everything! It’s quite pathetic (maybe even poetic justice) to see his kind go on and on and on about the awful Jews while they are being devoured by muslims.

  19. R Davis says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 6:12 am

    The deal in the Middle East has been & still is today –
    “we will arm you only if you agree not to touch Israel”
    Who is the enemy of Israel, when the nations of the Middle East have all signed off – with a hand on their heart –
    ” we the leaders of the nations of the Middle East are truly grateful for the goodies we are about to receive from our Western benefactors & do solemnly swear never to lay a hand on their precious Israel ”
    THIS IS THE ONLY REASON ISRAEL EXISTS TODAY.
    NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE ARDENT FIGHTERS OR THAT THEIR GOD PROTECTS THEM.
    And here we have Proudly Captain Dreadful Bibi Netanyahu beating on his proverbially hair chest, bragging “how great we art – how great we art”
    Yasser Arafat built up a truly magnificent & to be reckoned defense force with monies from the West.
    Which would have made such an immediate history of Israel – so why did Arafat not level Israel ?
    Because the deal was “but don’t touch Israel”

    • Tradewinds says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 8:57 am

      Go away you moron and Jew-hater.

    • Rebecca says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 8:58 am

      You have zero knowledge of the history of Israel. Go read about their wars. War of Independence, 6 day war……….
      Israel fought numerous countries surrounding it at a time.
      Israel survives on miracles.
      The past war- operation protective edge- the Iron Dome only intercepted MOST of the rockets- what happened to the rest? how come they didn’t land on population centers?
      What happened when the rockets were being aimed at Tel Aviv, and the Iron dome failed to intercept it? One rocket was headed straight for the Barzili building- and the last minute……………………… a wind came and knocked it into the sea.
      What about Saddam Hussains scud missles (doesn’t seem like you know much about Israel’s history, so you probably don’t know what I’m talking about)
      39 scud missiles were being aimed at population centers- and, should’ve killed hundreds in the densely populated areas. and they didn’t.

    • NateTheGreat says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 2:32 pm

      Sorry, but the Jews do need a homeland. Like or not they deserve one. They just don’t put up with any BS because they LIVE there in the front. I love his point about the Islamic societies crumbling away to militant Islam. Although I suppose in Egypt the military took that back over from the Muslim Brotherhood. I think the big picture issue here is lack of jobs, economy sucks, lots of young people pissed off and out of work. Lets join Jihad because at least there is something to do.

      Israel is rightly keeping society civilized. They are not afraid to stand up for themselves.

    • gravenimage says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 8:50 pm

      More nasty crap from Muslim apologist R Davis.

      The truth is that Muslim nations have several times attacked Israel outright—and they got their asses handed to them every time.

      And if R Davis were a rational actor, why would he be gloating over his perceived weakness of the only democratic nation in the Middle East, surrounded by savage Muslim enemies?

      Only because he is *not* a rational actor, and wants to see barbarism prevail. *Ugh*.

      More crap:

      AND – I wondered … why is this warring going on ?
      MONEY
      MONEY
      MONEY
      = big $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
      But for whom ?
      Drones are only sophisticated toy planes…

      Yet the price tag can be a cool $12 million each…
      …………………………………

      We aren’t paying for the component parts, but for the innovation and expertise.

      Like any concrete-minded barbarian, R Davis does not understand this.

      Just like calculators, computers, and cell phones, drones—for good or ill—are likely to come way down in price, and probably quite soon.

      But what is R Davis’ main point here? He is clearly trying to insinuate that we are not really fighting Jihad, and must be spending all that money on something else—something secret and nefarious.

      By doing this, he is both slamming any Western efforts to oppose Jihad, and suggesting that Jihad terror is not really a threat.

  20. duh_swami says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 6:19 am

    The only difference between Hamas, ISIS, Boko, Al-Shabaab, Chechen’s, Uighur’s, or anyubem, is some water and land mass, everything else is the same. It’s Islam, baby…It ain’t sumptin else.

  21. R Davis says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 6:27 am

    AND – I wondered … why is this warring going on ?
    MONEY
    MONEY
    MONEY
    = big $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
    But for whom ?
    Drones are only sophisticated toy planes which can be easily, hacked & hijacked – you don’t need a missile to shoot it down you need a tech savvy, pimply, teenager with a laptop.
    Yet the price tag can be a cool $12 million each –
    THAT IS A LOT OF $$$ FOR A TOY THAT A KID CAN PULL OUT OF THE SKY IN A FEW MINUTES.
    WHAT ELSE IS FAKE ?
    WHERE DOES THE MONEY GO ?
    BECAUSE IT DOES NOT GO TO PAY FOR THE WARRING.

  22. Abester says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 7:22 am

    It’s been a long time since I read anything this good coming from a politician and leader.

  23. Edward Cline says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 8:06 am

    It still reads like a yadda-yadda denial that Islam isn’t evil at root. Islam can’t be anything but “militant.” Was there a difference between Nazism and “militant” Nazism? Between Communism and “militant” Communism? I’m not buying the artificial distinction between Islam and its “militant” form. It’s one and the same.

    • Tradewinds says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 8:54 am

      “Islam can’t be anything but “militant.”

      Exactly. “militant Islam” is redundant. Not to mention ridiculous.

      • John C. Barile says

        Oct 3, 2014 at 10:57 pm

        Islam also operates in a passive mode. No, it’s not a pointless distinction. A volcano, by way of analogy, is by turns violent, smouldering, quiescent, dormant–or extinct.

        • Tradewinds says

          Oct 3, 2014 at 11:05 pm

          What’s the passive mode? Pretending assimilation and peace while increasing their numbers and waiting until they’re powerful enough demographically to strike?

  24. sandsgrandmother says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 8:48 am

    He mentions that no other country would allow another country to bomb their cities and build tunnels under ground. The U.S. wouldn’t do this ,now would they? Of course not. Instead , this administration has made it easier, we allow them to walk across the border and then reward them with benefits . The U.S. tax payer is paying people to come here and kill us. I think it remarkable that he can contain himself from not mentioning how this administration help supply weapons to these terrorists. He refrains how our political leaders support these terrorists and actually they do a dance of romance in order to receive terrorists monies for their political agenda. Our own political people and banks SUPPORT IN MANY WAYS THESE TERRORISTS.

  25. mortimer says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 9:51 am

    Jihad has NOTHING TO DO with Islam!

    “Chapter: Condemnation of the one who dies without having gone out for jihaad or having thought of doing so.” Then he quoted the hadeeth of Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him), who said: “The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: ‘Whoever dies without having gone out for jihaad or having thought of doing so, dies on a branch of hypocrisy.’” (Saheeh Muslim, 3533).

    Nope…NOTHING to do with Islam. I’m convinced.

  26. Silvia says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 9:56 am

    ROBERT, THIS HAS SOME CONNECTION TO THIS (Islam, DUH!) but I don’t know how to send it to you so I’m posting it here.

    Muslim pogrom in the streets of France

    • Tradewinds says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 2:16 pm

      director@jihadwatch.org

    • Mirren10 says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 2:25 pm

      Hi, Silvia.

      If you want to send something to Robert, there is a box on the right hand side, saying ”contact Jihad Watch”.

      You can post it in there.

      Am Yisrael Chai !

  27. Mo says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 11:54 am

    @ Nordicelt

    “Hmmm,..I was just wondering,..Is there such a thing as “militant’ Judaism, or such a thing as a Jewish “extremist”,.?
    Inquiring minds want to know,..”

    No, you’re not “just wondering”. You are trying to draw some comparison between Judaism and Islam.

    There isn’t one. So don’t even try. Judaism has zero open ended commands to commit violence against anyone. That’s why there are no Jews committing such acts on a regular basis, all over the world, in obedience to any such commands.

    Go play those games elsewhere.

  28. John C. Barile says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 12:07 pm

    Go back to Stormfront.

  29. IronyDome says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 12:24 pm

    This is probably Bibi’s best speech in his history of great speeches. It’s high time a world leader address the global ambitions of Islam and the fact that each of these terrorist groups share the same ideologies. The West simply refuses to believe that these groups seek to restore the caliphate. They say it’s ridiculous paranoia, that they can never succeed. Whether or not they can succeed is irrelevant; they believe they can and so they will try, and we’d best be prepared.

    I liked the line where he says the world will soon be facing the same threats Israel is currently facing. They certainly will if they don’t wake up.

    • Silvia says

      Oct 1, 2014 at 1:11 pm

      The world is already facing the exact same horrors. They just don’t want to call a spade a spade.

  30. Dennis Trisker says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 12:42 pm

    Great speech. I hope it went into the hearts of the listeners. We should make every effort to get it to the public.

  31. Islofob IS-1 says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 2:48 pm

    This battle, or war, is made more difficult by the leadership, and the controls placed on these people by the progressive movement.

    Once you join the movement, it takes control of the message, the news, the actions they take. Netanyahu is no different, he is a member of C.F.R. , and as such, he must tow the line to its direction. This is why Hamas still controls Gaza, and is why the battle agains islam will be more deadly than it should, or has to be.

    The progressive new world order view is red, and a lot more red is going to be spilled.

  32. Gene says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 2:56 pm

    “Militant Islam,” is there any other kind?

    Given the blindness and insanity that grips the political establishment and politically correct, Netanyahu cannot say the truth flat out. But he essentially has. Obama and other western leaders stand around saying Islam isn’t Islam, despite 1400 years of history to prove otherwise. So even getting some one to admit the connection is a big step forward.

  33. Linda Rivera says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 5:41 pm

    Netanyahu is EXACTLY like all of our Western traitor leaders. He lies and DECEIVES for Islam. We are abandoned and betrayed by all of our leaders. But we are not abandoned by Almighty God, our Precious Wonderful Awesome, Magnificent Creator.

  34. Daniel Triplett says

    Oct 1, 2014 at 11:32 pm

    Brilliant speech by the most brilliant World leader on the planet today.

    I too am disappointed, as some others here, about the parsing of words with “It’s not militants. It’s not Islam. It’s militant Islam.”

    I don’t think he’s ignorant about this though. He’s surrounded by Muslims who hate Jews. About 20% of the Israeli citizenry is also Sunni Muslim. So I’m sure he’s done his homework and studied what Islam is all about.

    The man with the weight of the World on his shoulders has really just two choices from this point forward:

    Say “Islam” is the enemy. Making clear to every Muslim on Earth that he/she is the Enemy of Israel.
    Say “militant Islam” is the Enemy of Israel, making every Muslim on Earth who doesn’t consider himself/herself a “militant Muslim” believe that Israel does not consider him/her an Enemy of Israel.

    PM Netanyahu made clear over a year ago, and well before Iraq collapsed into ISIS control, that if Israel alone was forced to fight Iran and its proxies, and do it without using Israeli nuke weapons, that Israel would only be able to delay the assembly of Iranian nuke weapons by “two and a half or three years,” unable to destroy the Iranian nuke threat indefinitely.

    Charles Krauthammer opined on Brett Baier Tuesday that he’s not sure Netanyahu knows if he can win against Iran.

    If Netanyahu believes Israel cannot by itself defeat Iran & Co, then Netanyahu must enlist the support of some Allies to fight alongside of Israel. He knows he can’t count on Obama or much, if any of Europe. So Israelis feel like they don’t have many friends in the World. Therefore, Israel must take any friend she can, anywhere she can get them. This is why the Prime Minister is choosing Option 2 above. Of course he’d prefer to have the entire non-Muslim World have his back and join the fight, rather than ally with Muslim states, but he doesn’t have a choice.

    He either chooses Option 1 above, then fights every Muslim on Earth by himself, which he knows is impossible for Israel, in addition to facing a Civil War inside of Israel’s borders with the Israeli Muslims. Or he chooses Option 2, and destroys Iran with the help of all the Sunni Muslims he didn’t piss off by calling out every Muslim on Earth by identifying “Islam” as the Enemy.

    By capitalizing on the shared threat, he’s trying to ally with the other Arab states threatened by Iran. Unless Netanyahu intends to use ICBM nuke weapons exclusively against Iran, he’s going to need overflight rights of many Arab states, and possibly some forward basing and tanker support.

    Remember later in his speech, he described such an alliance:

    ” Ladies and Gentlemen, despite the enormous challenges facing Israel, I believe we have an historic opportunity.

    After decades of seeing Israel as their enemy, leading states in the Arab World increasingly recognize that together we and they face many of the same dangers: principally this means a nuclear-armed Iran and militant Islamist movements gaining ground in the Sunni World.

    Our challenge is to transform these common interests to create a productive partnership. One that would build a more secure, peaceful and prosperous Middle East.

    Together we can strengthen regional security. We can advance projects in water, agriculture, in transportation, in health, in energy, so many fields.

    I believe the partnership between us can also help facilitate peace between Israel and the Palestinians. ”

    I’m guessing deep in Netanyahu’s heart, he’d prefer to see Islam extinguished from the Earth. This is possible, but he knows Israel can’t do it by herself. It will require buy-in from an Alliance of most non-Muslim states, none of which he has, and it will require a nuke weapon offensive delivered on a Biblical scale.

    This is what our POTUS should be doing right now. He should be developing a World Alliance, especially with the nuclear armed non-Muslim states, especially Russia, China, India, and the NATO states. Turkey is not our ally as a Muslim state. The US President should also be prepared and willing to deliver the nuke attacks with the superior nuke arsenal and delivery systems that the US has over Israel. I believe Netanyahu ought to be the Supreme Allied Commander, but most of the firepower must come from the US.

    I believe our first choice, for Israel and the US both, in addition to the World at large, should be Worldwide criminalization of Islam. This is the only long term solution to the Islamic problem. As long as Islam exists, there will be no peace in the World.

    This can easily be done with nuke weapons and incremental random Strategic Area Bombing. Incremental, to minimize damage and enemy civilian casualties, giving them time to re-think their loyalties to Satan’s Islam. And random, such that know one would know where to hide, convincing every Muslim in a Muslim state that he and his loved ones could be next. We decided three days was an appropriate increment between the Japanese strikes.

    Surviving Japanese and German enemies interviewed post-WWII all said that the unrelenting, random bombing of their cities is what broke their will to fight over anything else.

    Today, we could similarly pressure the World’s Muslims to force their state leaders to accept Allied terms, eliminating Islam, among other terms like surrendering control of all oil fields in Muslim states (becoming non-Muslim states).

    We could do all of this inside of two weeks, at a cost of $7B, without risking one Allied soldier’s life. The only way to defeat Islam is with nuclear weapons. We simply don’t have enough gold or military to invade and occupy every Muslim sovereignty on Earth.

    God gave America the intelligence and resources to build nuke weapons to confront evil. In this Biblical Holy War we’re in, I believe God’s Will is for us to use nuke weapons to extinguish Satan’s Islamic ideology.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • GreekEmpress on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Apathy Rules the World on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • tim gallagher on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Keith O on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Mount Zion on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.