• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

OK beheader: “Sharia law is coming!” — posted photos of beheadings on FB

Sep 28, 2014 8:47 am By Robert Spencer

JahKeemYisraelMuslimbrothersWhile the FBI pretends that Oklahoma beheader Jah’Keem Yisrael’s Facebook page doesn’t exist and goes in search of a motive that the social media page makes abundantly clear, I used the page yesterday to show the dishonesty of the mainstream media and the beheader’s mosque. And now even the mainstream media is having to take note of what Jah’Keem Yisrael has posted there.

“‘SHARIA LAW IS COMING!!!!’: Oklahoma beheading suspect posted photos of decapitation, wrote U.S. is ‘going into flames’ on Facebook,” by Meg Wagner and Rich Schapiro, New York Daily News, September 27, 2014 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Months before he beheaded a co-worker at an Oklahoma food plant, a fired factory worker posted on Facebook a photo of a burning lower Manhattan during the 9/11 attacks.

“Dnt yall knw why the Eastern part of the world hates Amerika? Everything God says don’t do Amerika does,” Alton Nolen wrote in the photo caption.

“She (the Statue of Liberty) is going into flames. She and anybody who’s with her.”

The picture and sickening screed are among many chilling posts on the 30-year-old Islamic convert’s profile.

The most disturbing is a gruesome photo of a beheading.

“Thus do we find the clear precedent that explains the peculiar penchant of Islamic terrorists to behead their victims: it is merely another precedent bestowed by their Prophet,” reads a message written above the photo posted in October.

Next to a photo of Pope Benedict XVI posted in May, Nolen wrote: “SHARIA LAW IS COMING!!!!”

Nolen’s barbaric attack Thursday came hours after he lost his job at Vaughan Foods in Moore.

The knife-wielding suspect barged into the plant’s front office and decapitated co-worker Collen Hufford, 54. Nolen then attacked a second female co-worker, Traci Johnson, 43, and stabbed her repeatedly.

Nolen’s rampage came to an end when the company’s chief operating officer Mark Vaughan shot his deranged former employee.

Nolen underwent surgery at a local hospital and is expected to survive. Johnson was hospitalized in critical condition but has been upgraded to stable, officials said.

A spokesman for the Oklahoma City Islamic group said Saturday that Nolen was seen as “a little weird” but didn’t raise any red flags.

Police have said there was no evidence that Nolen’s new faith motivated his barbaric crime.

But his online presence provides a portrait of a man who appeared to be obsessed with Islamic extremism.

His cover photo featured Taliban fighters — and he posted several uncaptioned pics of Osama Bin Laden.

Beside a photo showing an explosion, Nolen wrote: “WARNING TO MANKIND: ONE DAY THE EARTH WILL BE CHANGED TO A DIFFERENT EARTH, AND SO WILL BE THE HEAVENS.”…

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Jihad in the U.S., journalistic bias Tagged With: featured


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. mortimer says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 8:55 am

    The barbarians are coming! Actually, the barbarians are here.

    Time to react. Jihad should be made illegal in America.

    • john spielman says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 10:22 am

      Advocating for sharia law should be made illegal, as it is against all that America stands for.( Not dissimilar to the laws against pedophilia and child pornography) Also the reasons that sharia is evil should be taught in schools. We should also teach about the vile life of muhammed, the demon possessed mass murderer, thief , liar, misogynist and pedophile pseudo prophet of islam

      • Wellington says

        Sep 28, 2014 at 12:31 pm

        Advocating for Sharia law in America, john spielman, should not be made illegal, anymore than advocating for a Marxist or some secular fascist takeover of America should be made illegal. What should be prosecuted (and in general is), is ACTING upon the advocating of anything which contravenes the Constitution or statutory law. Even the disgusting NAMBLA has the right to advocate for man-boy love, but acting upon this will, fittingly, put such a person in prison for a very long time. Ditto for anything in Sharia which goes against American law, though remember that some Sharia breaks no law (e.g., the requiremet to wash before prayers) and therefore can occur.

        In short, a person can think and say most anything they want to here in America, but there is definite restriction on action (of course you can’t do something like yell “fire” in a crowded theatre and then claim freedom of speech). Let’s keep it this way. We don’t have to scrap constitutional liberties in order to defeat those who would replace the Constitution with something else.

        One last important deveopment in all this, though, is that Islam should be widely recognized, including by American elites, as a negative, just as, say, Nazism or Marxism should be. As I’ve written before, this is the biggest game changer we neeed, i.e., Islam going from being looked upon as something good to something bad. Then it can still exist (including some of Sharia) but it will be thereafter looked upon as a religious ideology for the confused, for losers, for miscreants, for haters, which is another way of saying that it will be put on the trash heap of history along with other malevolent ideologies like Marxism and Nazism. Also, some legal pretext should be found to severely restrict Muslim immigration and the stripping of US citizenship should occur for all those who, how shall I put it, prove to be the most devout of Muslims by doing something like joining ISIS.

        I do agree with you, though, that proper education of Islam and its warped founder should be widely taught. Not there yet.

        • Champ says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 12:40 pm

          Thank you for your erudite contribution, Wellington!

        • Mirren10 says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 2:09 pm

          Excellent post, Wellington.

          Once one starts to mess around with freedom of speech, freedom of articulation of one’s thoughts and beliefs, one is on a slippery slope downhill to the worst of totalitarianism.

          Even the most repulsive examples of speech/thought should be protected under the law, as in the examples you give, with of course the embargo on *action* that contravenes the law.

          After all, who really cares whether mohammedans perform wudu (so long as they don’t attempt to do it in a public loo), or which foot they enter the loo on, or any other of the nonsensical rubbish they choose to burden themselves with ? I certainly don’t.

          It is stoning, child marriage, FGM, the divorce laws and the inheritance laws, the wife beating laws, the apostasy laws et al, that are so vile and reprehensible, and should never be allowed to gain the tiniest foothold.

          ”I do agree with you, though, that proper education of Islam and its warped founder should be widely taught. Not there yet.”

          Absolutely. This is **essential**. Which is again why I, like you, graven and others, are vehemently **against** the banning of any islamic literature. People need to be **taught** about the foul character of this disgusting religions creator, and forced to make moral judgements. We need to roll back the whole PC/MC crapola, and teach people to think critically, once again.

          I’m retired now, but I still occasionally do some private A Level tutoring, and am always coming up against this PC/MC nonsense the poor little things have been brainwashed with. I always dig away at it, and insist they learn to use their eyes and ears, and demand they use their critical faculties. It’s a dirty job, but someone has to do it ! 🙂

        • Isabella says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 2:13 pm

          My problem with your views is that there is a lot more Muslims than any other groups than you mentioned. These people reproduce in a greater number than any other minorities and their political weight is on the rise and their influence as well. It is a reality. I do not like it.

          Who is there to pretend there will never be a Muslim president in the USA? Scary isn’t?

        • Tradewinds says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 2:25 pm

          You’re exactly right, Isabella. The polygamous over-populating Muslims must be stopped. There is no comparison to the numbers of Muslims with the scant few numbers of Nazis and Marxists who pose no threat. No demographic comparison. Muslim polygamy is a war tactic:

          “One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”

          – Houari (Mohamed) Boumedienne, President of Algeria, 1965 – 1978, in a 1974 speech at the UN

          That’s called polygamous Demographic Jihad.

        • John Spielman says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 2:28 pm

          Dear Wellington: it IS illegal to COUNCEL (advocate ) someone to comitt crime! Advocating for sharia law is to advocate or COUNCEL to KILL- homosexuals, adulterers, apostates, and people like me who publicly denounce Muhammad as demon possessed mass murderer thief liar misogynist and pedophile. Thus is should be illegal to advocate for sharia law

        • Wellington says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 3:40 pm

          Dear john spielman: Well, yes and no about advocating someone to commit a crime. For instance, one could say, “We need to burn this building down” and that would be protected speech. However, if one said the same thing and started handing out torches, well, that is not protected. There are fine lines sometimes in these cases. And so one could say, in general, that adulterers and homosexuals should be stoned to death or hung but any provocation (‘fighting words”) or action that would follow upon this would tip the scale almost in every instance into something illegal.

          Another thing I think you’re missing is that much of Sharia is harmless and not against any law, so banning all of Sharia is simply unnecessary and trying to do so would, I am certain, discredit the cause of opposing Islamic supremacist designs. In fact, it could be make such a cause a laughing stock.

          Reconsider, js. I despise Islam as much as you do or anyone, but in opposing it optimally you have to be smart and knowledgable. After all, it’s not enough to be right. You have to know how to be right.

        • Wellington says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 3:48 pm

          Isabella: I understand your concern about the “numbers thing” but I know of no stautory or case law that asserts that a totalitarian ideology is permissible in America UNTIL it reaches a certain number of adherents. At the very least, new legal ground, and I mean very new legal ground, would have to be explored and developed to make the AMOUNT of adherents of a totalitarian ideology the decisive factor in disallowing it.

          Besides, I stand by my original argument that once Islam is no longer looked upon as a positive, once it is accurately described for what it is, i.e., an ideology in so many ways completely at odds with the best of America and inimical to basic Constitutional guarantees, that this will be enough to marginalize it in American society at large. And, of course, ANY action carried out in the name of Islam which goes against the law should be prosecuted to the maximum. Ancillary developments like virtually eliminating Muslim immigration and stripping certain Muslims of US citizenship for certain “activities” would be extremely helfpful too.

        • Bettina says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 4:21 pm

          Wellington, your points are well taken. But what about hate speech, hate publishing, and incitement to violence? These were part and parcel of Nazism and Jew hatred, and led to genocidal slaughter.
          Do you feel that these actions, which eventually lead to murder — whether en masse or lone-wolf attacks — should be protected?
          I think there is a law somewhere on our books here in the U.S.

        • Wellington says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 6:51 pm

          Bettina: Don’t confuse actions with speech. Speech in a free society should be virtually inviolable. So-called hate crimes and prohibition of hate speech actually do an injustice to liberty. Virtually never punish the motive nor the speech. Punish the action.

          Weimar Germany, which you alluded to, simply didn’t have a tradition or understanding of what I mentioned above. Therefore, totalitarians, in this case Nazis, could take advantage of fledgling freedom—–which they most certainly did.

          America, by contrast, has something far more important and wise than the Weimar Constitution, and things going for it far more than traditional German authoritarianism (let’s face it, the Germans are good at many things, but freedom is not one of them). America has the tradition of Anglo-Saxon liberty (which beats anything on the continent of Europe, including those goofy French ideas of liberty) and, what is more important, the document that William Gladstone, four-time Prime Minister of the UK, called the greatest document ever written in the history of mankind, i.e., the American Constitution.

          I submit this is enough, IF combined with common sense and proper knowledge of Islam, to insure that America remains forever free of Islam’s malevolent, freedom-crushing and totalitarian designs. Of course, clowns like Obama and Kerry simply will not do. The American Constitution deserves far, far better than the likes of the Obamas and the Kerrys.

        • Wellington says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 8:49 pm

          Michael: You present much material. Unfortunately, you’re in error about most of it. 18 U.S. Code 2385 is far better known as the Smith Act, passed in 1940. You know or should know that it has largely been denuded of its original intent by the 1957 Yates v. U.S. case which distinguished, and which is still good law, the difference between advocacy of an idea with incitement in mind v. the teaching of an idea as an idea, as a concept. This comports EXACTLY with what I have been trying to say all along, which is that thought and statements are almost entirely protected under the Constitution but action upon a large corpus of thought is not. I do wish folks like yourself would finally get this. I know you mean well, but more knowledge in this area would greatly aid your good intentions.

          Respecting subordinate issues you raise, I will here address them, specifically two, and those being the political element in Islam and the capacity to change the Constitution (or, as will be explained, use the Constitution in a very rare way).

          First, so what if Islam has a political component? Nazism and Marxism most certainly do and they have never been banned in America, even during WWII and the Cold War. And such ideologies certainly entertained a radical overthrow of America and its Constitution, just as Islam does.

          As for malleability in the Constitution, it is an interesting point no doubt. It has been my conviction that probably, most likely, the Constitution does not need to be changed to combat Islam, which is arguably the most powerful and nefarious of all totalitarian ideologies ever created by man, in large part because it hides behind a religious veil as other such ideologies have not. However, I have allowed for the possibility, should present application of American law, combined with the very crucial looking upon Islam by the body politic at large as a giant negative, still not prove to be enough to thwart Isalm’s malevolent, freedom-crushing designs, that a new amendment to the Constitution specifically removing Islam from First Amendment protection might be necessary. There is also the possibility, once again if present legal remedies combined with far greater knowledge of Islam by America at large, including by American elites, still prove to be insufficient, that Congress could pass anti-Islam legislation and invoke Article III, Section 2 while doing so, which would preclude the American judiciary from passing judgment on such legislation (this was actually done by Congress during the Reconstruction period). Again, I don’t think this will be necessary if what I outlined were followed, but these two options (a constitutional amendment or the invoking of the specific provision I mentioned in Article III) are fall-back positions should what I outlined in previous posts prove not to be enough.

          Your turn.

        • roger says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 10:55 pm

          I don’t believe that Islam will ever be viewed as a negative doctrine, influence etc. Why ?
          Because there is waaay to many schools, universities, media outlets continually and carefully changing the narrative around what is manifestly and overtly violent, mysognic
          and oppressive about the religion of peace’s world wide activities until all this simply becomes acceptable to society, even highly thought of.

        • gravenimage says

          Sep 29, 2014 at 3:20 pm

          Excellent posts, Wellington. Your knowledgeable views are always appreciated.

          And one of the main points—even if one were not to stand up for First Amendment rights on principle—is this: any restriction of freedom of speech is *far* more likely to enable the spread of undemocratic ideas than it is to hobble them.

          We have seen this bourn out historically over and over again.

        • voegelinian says

          Sep 29, 2014 at 11:26 pm

          John Spielman, I agree that Sharia put into practice is a crime (or rather a whole constellation of crimes on the books). If the problem of Islam were merely criminal (merely a matter of Sharia), one could argue that we do not need to outlaw Sharia and merely punish the crimes as they happen. However, Islam is more than merely a criminal organization; it is an army actually waging war on us — waging it violently by killing us (and plotting more horrific terror plots worse than 911), and stealthily by pretending to be disconnected from the killing. Because all Muslims are soldiers in that war, we need to respond appropriately. The most humane thing to do would be to initiate Operation Bum’s Rush (aka Operation Buh-Bye): total deportation. Just because it cannot be done now (only because our Western sociopolitical culture remains enthralled to its PC MC neurosis — a neurosis so broad and deep, it even infects many in the Counter-Jihad), does not mean that 1) it should not be done; nor that 2) it cannot be done; nor that 3) it will not be done once the West shakes off its ridiculous Rip Van Winkle Amnesia.

      • Michael says

        Sep 28, 2014 at 1:18 pm

        You’re absolutely right, John. I completely agree with you, and not with Wellington. The folks advocating for sharia law are about as unamerican as one could get. They should be jailed or deported, quite frankly. Whether we want to admit it or not, we’re in a war against “radical” islam. An ideological war. Those fighting on the opposite side of this war are nothing more than traitors of the US and everything the US stands for. They should be treated as such.

        Sharia law represents a direct threat to the West. It should be banned.

        There are people acting against sharia law right now, actually. American Law for American Courts legislation is being passed at the state level to prevent the use of sharia law in US courts.

        • Tradewinds says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 2:17 pm

          Agree, Michael. Islam should be banned. Without Islam no Sharia and no Jihad. Islam is a mass-murdering menace to all civilized people and should be banned. The Muslims can stay in their own countries and practice their mass-murder beheading ideology there. Not in the United States. The beheading in Oklahoma should be the end of Islam in our country.

        • Jay Boo says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 2:24 pm

          Mercurial mendacious Michael said,

          “Sharia law represents a direct threat to the West. It should be banned.”
          FINE

          But why don’t you debate what Wellington actually wrote instead of using a cheap trick

          Michael your comment has more straw than a haystack

        • Wellington says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 2:24 pm

          Michael, one could very well argue that American Communist Party members and Aryan Nation members (and others along these lines) are also about “as unamerican as one could get.” Want to jail or deport them too?

          Look, not to hit this too hard, but those like you who are advocating the jailing or deporting of those advocating Sharia law in America are living in a judicial dream world. Ain’t gonna’ happen. Nor does it need to. Nor is it constitutional. There isn’t a single member of the American judiciary that I know of that is advocating the jailing or deporting of those angling for Sharia in America. Besides, as I’ve mentioned before, some Sharia (e.g., washing before prayers; not wanting interest collected on loans) doesn’t contravene any American law. Do you really want to disallow ALL Sharia? Think this one through.

          I do fully advocate state legislatures (Congress too) passing laws which forbid the application of those elemets of Sharia that are already illegal in this nation (redundancy to be sure but redundant laws are common place). What’s important, though, is that the SPECIFIC heinous and illegal actions found in Sharia be disallowed. Just making all Sharia illegal, or even mentioning the word “Sharia,” will almost certainly be overturned in the courts as a violation of freedom of religion (remember: just because a religion is heinous doesn’t mean it can be made illegal; for instance, Satanism is a religion but not illegal here in America).

          I do wish more folks here at JW, well intentioned though they be, would learn something about American statutory and constitutional law before opining. Besides, the Constitition is strong enough, as Thomas Jefferson said in his first inaugural address in March of 1801, to even permit those to live here who would destroy the Constitution, all this serving as a testinmony to the power of our freedom. Of course, such freedom must be accompanied by common sense and proper knowledge. Right now, it’s not the freedom part that needs to be changed, which is what folks like you want to alter, but rather the common sense and knowledge elements that need to be looked to since both of them are too scarce where the matter of Islam and Sharia in America are concerned.

        • John Spielman says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 2:32 pm

          Jay boo: stop with this demeaning names and cheap insults like you did with Michael, argue your points without name calling!

        • Michael says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 6:03 pm

          @Wellington

          Most religions, including your example of satanism, have a belief system and a moral code. islam, in contrast to most religions, also has a political component. Political islam seeks to conquer non-muslims through jihad and change their societies to fit within the confines of sharia law. This is in essence advocating the overthrow of the US government (including the US judicial system). Under 18 U.S. Code § 2385, advocating the overthrow of the US government is absolutely illegal. Punishment for it includes a fine and/or imprisonment for up to 20 years.

          The vast majority of US mosques have been found to have imams that recommend literature that preaches violence and hatred of non-muslims. Some of those imams undoubtedly preach from those same violent books. As political islam seeks to overthrow the current government and judicial system, mosques that support this approach should be investigated and shut down under violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2385. Furthermore, their imams should be jailed (at the bare minimum) under that same legislation.

          If you’re a student of law, you should know that even without 18 U.S. Code § 2385, the constitution is malleable. It has been changed many times over the years to address the needs and concerns of the current US population. If deemed necessary to address the threat of political islam, it could absolutely be amended.

    • Undaunted says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 11:45 am

      It won’t be made illegal in America. So we all have to adapt and overcome. The best preparation against the type of attack is:

      1) Gun-free zones must be made illegal: yes, even schools.

      2) Employees and staff of schools and businesses should be encouraged to have and carry on them concealed pistols and multiple magazines. Those carrying thus should be licensed properly in their state and have to register with school and work-place leadership so that it’s known to those who matter that: “Undaunted in the A Building, at workstation 32ZA, carries a concealed Browning Hi-Power and several hi-capacity magazines; and he has this and that training and experience.”

      3) People who could own firearms ~ because it’s legal for them to do so and because they can afford to do so ~ should buy at least one high quality semi-automatic pistol and several high-capacity magzines and train with that weapon a lot, and carry it with them at all times. At all times. “Training” means more than punching paper at the local shooting range once a year.

      3) If the state in which you live permits concealed carry of pistols then you should get a Concealed Weapons Permit. If your state does not permit concealed carry, then choose now if you want to obey that law and end up squirting blood out of what used to be your neck as you kick and twitch in the gory mess that was once your life. Study the doctrine of “competing harms”: “Yes, I did have a pistol concealed on my person and did not have a permit to do so but I am a reasonable man and reasonably determined over time based on these facts that my life ~ and those of whom I love ~ could be in danger at any moment in this violent world and up and down my violent street. So, as to the incident in question; the deceased attacker, whom I did in fact shoot, is in fact dead because he made me shoot him by posing a deadly and imminent threat to myself and my wife and kids. My choice was to permit him to kill my family or to stop his unprovoked attack on me and my family even if it meant that I had to break the law in order to do it.”

      I’ve written for years about these days and this savagery coming to America, and what to do in various situations. So, it’s not like we weren’t warned in multiple ways and it’s not like there is nothing to do but gasp and curse Islam and make feckless comments at social media sites.

      Man up, people.

      • Jay Boo says

        Sep 28, 2014 at 12:03 pm

        Your one note solution can be summarized that Islam can only be defeated with guns.

        • Undaunted says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 12:18 pm

          Not really; but if that’s the way you see it, then that’s the way you see it. If Islam wants to be nice and sweet and harmless then let it be so. But, when Muslims ~ or Baptists ~ choose to be barbarians then they need to be stopped and that doesn’t happen with pithy comments made at someone else’s blog.

          Historically, Islam has only been stopped by use of force. Am I suggesting a bullet in the head for every Muslim? Hell, no. Absolutely not. If they want to behave and follow the rules then let them do their peaceful thing. But when any of them, and/or any person of any belief system, chooses to attack me I have the right to defend myself. And the first step in self-defense is preparation as I suggested above.

        • Michael says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 1:23 pm

          To defeat islam one has to bulldoze or shut down their mosques. If one just shoots muslims they will continue radicalizing more at the mosques. The mosques whose imams preach hate should be one of the primary targets in this war.

          Just take a look at what the government over in Angola has done recently. They have the right approach, honestly. Freedom of religion, etc, but a complete ban on islam.

        • Angemon says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 1:48 pm

          Angola didn’t ban islam. What happens is that, despite several requests from the angolan muslim community, islam is not officially recognized as a religion because it doesn’t meet the standards – having at least 100,000 confirmed followers spread through at least two-thirds of the country. As for the bulldozing of mosques, that’s what happens when they’re build without the required permit.

          The story about Angola banning islam seems to have originated from within the Angolan muslim community, trying to play the victim to create international backlash and pressure the Angolan government.

        • jj says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 1:29 pm

          islam only knows savagery and killing of infidels.there is no such moderate muslim.the radical will behead you while the moderate holds your feet down.

        • anon says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 1:50 pm

          Jay Boo

          You don’t get it, when Muslims start actively preying on us, snark and calling the police won’t help much, you’ll be dead before help reaches you if you’re the target of their Jihad.

          It will be up to you and if you are unarmed you’ll be nothing but a sheep ready to have it’s throat slit.

        • Jay Boo says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 1:59 pm

          Guns alone offer a false sense of security.
          Guns wont stop IED’s.

          From the day after Boston bombing.
          http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/16/use-ieds-in-us-terror-attacks-on-rise/

          The attack happened on April 15, 2013.
          The trial has been delayed into 2015
          The news media, Huff Post and Rolling Stone Magazine will try to hype it up and play innocent when they pander towards another attack by grievance mongering Muslims who don’t want really want to see ‘justice’ as they claim but to impose Islam’s Sharia.

          http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/25/boston-marathon-bombing-suspect-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-delay

        • Jay Boo says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 2:10 pm

          JJ
          Your comment may well be true but it is not relevant to what I said

        • Michael says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 6:16 pm

          @Angemon

          I’m pretty sure the Angolan government knew what they were doing when they made the requirements for officially recognized religions above what islam could attain.

          Also, their government has apparently shut down a number of mosques in the country in the past few years.

          I fully support their requirements for organized religions, and their efforts in shutting down mosques.

        • Angemon says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 7:34 pm

          There are several ethnic groups and many tribes in Angola. There are literally hundreds of religions not officially recognized by the Angolan government. With that in mind, I find it hard to believe that the Angolan government was specifically thinking about islam when setting up the requirements for what it takes for a religion to be officially recognized by the state.

          In any case, lacking official recognition is not the same as banning it or outlawing it. As for the mosques, they were closed and/or destroyed, not for being mosques per se, but because they were built without a permit.

          And since I’ve seen someone here denying the destruction of mosques in Angola, here’s a video:

        • gravenimage says

          Sep 29, 2014 at 3:36 pm

          Michael wrote:

          Just take a look at what the government over in Angola has done recently…
          …………………………….

          The idea that Angola has outlawed Islam and bulldozed all Mosques is a rumor that has been disproven many times.

          “Angola denies it has banned Islam”

          http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2013/11/angola-denies-reports-banning-islam-2013112782236279392.html

      • Jay Boo says

        Sep 28, 2014 at 2:08 pm

        My follow-up “Guns alone offer a false sense of security.
        Guns wont stop IED’s.”
        was meant for Undaunted

        Undaunted
        Your comment has stirred up the simpletons Michael and anon

        • Tradewinds says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 2:29 pm

          I think you’re the simpleton, Jay Boo. Michael is not. In fact, he’s right. So, just can it with the name-calling.

        • John Spielman says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 2:35 pm

          Yes jay boo, stop with the cheap shots!

        • Undaunted says

          Sep 29, 2014 at 7:00 am

          “… simpletons… ” Wow. Really amazing.

          I’ve had to pull out of many a dangerous, deadly situation the arrogant asses of people just like you; people who thanked me for seeing what they had not, for knowing what to do and doing it decisively when they were ignorant and scared.

          So, fuck off, jb.

      • Davegreybeard says

        Sep 28, 2014 at 4:53 pm

        Excellent post Undaunted, I am with you 100% on all points.

        Your reply to Jay Boo was clear, cogent, and hit like a hammer – which he sometimes needs.

        Glad to see your posts once in a while, they increasingly important.

        For the rest of you, ‘gun up” time may be shorter than it appears.

        Deus Vult!

        • gravenimage says

          Sep 29, 2014 at 3:52 pm

          Davegreybeard and Undaunted—it is important that all of us here remember that it was an armed off-duty reserve police officer who stopped this violent Jihadist’s rampage.

          Mark Vaughn almost certainly saved the life of Traci Johnson, the second victim, who was being stabbed—and he likely saved the lives of others, as well.

          There is no reason to think that the Jihadist would have stopped it he hadn’t *been stopped*.

          And Jay Boo and others—you are right, of course, that an armed citizenry is not the only answer to opposing the Jihad threat—but I don’t think anyone is making that claim.

          And I believe that aware Infidels ready and able to oppose Jihadists is very much a part of it.

    • Tradewinds says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 2:11 pm

      Islam should be made illegal. Without Islam there is no Jihad. No Islam = No Jihad. A simple formula.

      • Angemon says

        Sep 28, 2014 at 2:17 pm

        Making something illegal is not the same as removing it from existence.

        • Tradewinds says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 2:32 pm

          It’s a good start. Islam is too evil an ideology, a mass-murder ideology, to allow it to continue. Islam has murdered enough people in the early 21st century, beginning with the 3,000 Americans slaughtered by Islam on September 11, 2001.

        • Bettina says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 5:03 pm

          To remove the nefarious ideology, we’d need to deprogram all the children — millions of them…

        • voegelinian says

          Sep 29, 2014 at 11:33 pm

          Which is why we need to remove the agents of Islam, Muslims. Simply banning an idea or a book is not going to stop terror attacks, civil unrest, and beheadings.

        • Angemon says

          Sep 30, 2014 at 1:46 pm

          voegelinian posted:

          “Which is why we need to remove the agents of Islam, Muslims. Simply banning an idea or a book is not going to stop terror attacks, civil unrest, and beheadings.”

          Hello voegelinian .

          I think you should write that down and send it to your local elected representative, explaining in great detail on how the current laws and the Constitution allow for it, so it can get the proper attention it deserves.

          Meanwhile, you could tell us how would you go about identifying closet muslims – muslims who would claim not being muslims and went on terror attacks, civil unrest, and beheadings before they went on terror attacks, civil unrest, and beheadings. Otherwise one might be lead to believe your preoccupation stems from some amorphous antipathy toward muslims rather than the pragmatic level of an alarm at the deadly danger of terrorism and other forms of jihad violence (reasonably presumed to be metastasizing and not stable).

    • Fred says

      Sep 29, 2014 at 7:55 am

      gee .. I thought murder was already illegal.

      ….

  2. mortimer says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 8:57 am

    Actually, jihad is one of the most un-American actions imaginable! Jihad contravenes ‘live, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’ in every way.

    • Jay Boo says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 12:06 pm

      Get ready for a major jihad attack if Obama keeps playing games with Putin in Syria and the and on his doorstep the Ukraine.
      Obama has no idea the Pandora’s box he is about to unleash by playing games with Russia.

      • Undaunted says

        Sep 29, 2014 at 9:00 am

        So, genius; how would YOU suggest we “get ready” for an attack? Get the latest Fox News app?

        There is a profound difference between SAYING “Get ready…” and having the BALLS to actually DO something. Get it? I don’t think so.

  3. eib says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 9:07 am

    A group of 120 muslim scholars has made a statement telling isis to return to a religion of mercy. They made their statement in English, which just shows us who this word was meant to mollify. Islam is a charnel house community. Their words are meaningless. Their worship is as profane as that of Abiram.

    • Charli Main says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 12:50 pm

      ” made a statement telling ISIS to return to a religion of mercy ”
      In other words to stop being REAL MUSLIMS.!!!!!

      • Michael says

        Sep 28, 2014 at 1:24 pm

        Exactly, Charli.

    • Mirren10 says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 2:23 pm

      ”A group of 120 muslim scholars has made a statement telling isis to return to a religion of mercy.”

      That’s a yell. **Return** ?? It never has been. But I suppose there are still plenty of wishful idiots out there who’ll continue to allow themselves to be fooled. As Wellington says, not there yet.

    • Bettina says

      Oct 12, 2014 at 3:50 pm

      eib, I like “Their words are meaningless.”
      It perfectly echoes Wafa Sultan’s passage on her friends (lucky to thrive in America) speaking in English taqiyya to us, while talking trash with their muslim coreligionists. That trash, of course, being world domination and contempt for the infidels who have welcomed these scum balls to the U.S.

  4. Angemon says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 9:12 am

    Was that photo taken in a proctology convention or something?

    “Dnt yall knw why the Eastern part of the world hates Amerika? Everything God says don’t do Amerika does,” Alton Nolen wrote in the photo caption.

    Yes, what’s the deal with treating everyone equally, not forcing religion on anyone or outlawing marriage with children? Sounds like a really dreadful place… Do notice that Jah’Keem claims hate of America stems not from US foreign policies but from not following what god says.

    A spokesman for the Oklahoma City Islamic group said Saturday that Nolen was seen as “a little weird” but didn’t raise any red flags.

    And that should raise red flags on the group. They either couldn’t or didn’t want to identify him as a dangerous individual, so the obvious question is: how many more Jah’Keem Yisraels are regulars there?

    • john spielman says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 10:24 am

      no, they’re pointing out their collective IQ

    • Jay Boo says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 10:54 am

      Islam is the only religion that uses the proctology salute.

    • Mirren10 says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 12:10 pm

      “Was that photo taken in a proctology convention or something ?”

      🙂 🙂

      Angemon, I love you !

      To the more serious part of your post:

      Not raising any red flags. Yep, they either couldn’t, or didn’t *want* to identify him as dangerous – my vote goes for didn’t want to. Because, after all, what did this evil pos do, that isn’t in koran/hadith/sira ?

      Plus, as we’ve seen in the earlier threads, it looks as if this mosque and its ‘worshipers’ are every bit as vicious as jakeem. What sort of person calls this vicious, bloody murder “a foolish act” ??!!

  5. Jen says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 9:53 am

    They’re doing the same thing with the jihadist who stabbed the Australian police officers as well, and it seems the police playing along with it. Trying to act like there could be any other motive when the clear motive is jihad:

    “Mr Ashton said Haider’s family were in shock and had been co-operating and will continue to co-operate with police. They also wanted answers as to why their 18-year-old [son] became radicalised.” — ummm…

    Mr Ashton said the investigation, expected to go on for months, will focus on what motivated Haider.’Over the coming days and weeks we will talk to many people to find out what motivated him,’ he said. — I’ll give the police a small clue…it may help them cut their investigation time in half.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2770135/Police-hunt-three-mates-teenage-terrorist-Numan-Haider-attempted-stab-death-two-officers.html

  6. locomotivebreath1901 says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 10:03 am

    I heard you on the Steve Deace Show last week, Mr. Spencer, explaining how isis/isil originated, and why it’s metastasizing exponentially.

    Keep up the good work. God bless you and yours.

    • Bettina says

      Oct 12, 2014 at 3:56 pm

      IS says it all — you wasted your effort thinking you have to type ISIS/ISIL, my friend. Islamic State is plenty sufficient, Syria and Iraq notwithstanding…

  7. Peter Castle says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 10:16 am

    This is madness! Obama golfs while Americans are beheaded! See “Terror Strikes America – Again!” at http://t.co/nurkdy0GI6.

  8. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 11:05 am

    Sharia is coming? I’m afraid he’s right. So we move from Disraeli to Yisraeli, and meanwhile the Israeli lives under the looming threat of being nuked. The news entertainers juggle with the “question” of whether there’s a connection to the mosque. The real “question” to fill hours reviewing is whether there’s a connection to the Holy Ko-Ran and Hah-Deaths. That is where the verifiable facts lay.

  9. Beagle says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 11:15 am

    Jah’keem was so public with his motives, quoting 8.12 and posting a beheading photo, the FBI is actively obstructing justice and everyone with open eyes can see it. This is not new, the government concealing the truth about Islam and jihad, but never more apparent.

    Who watches the watchmen?

  10. Spurgeon says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 11:18 am

    Thanks for the link. I always like checking out the Daily Mail website along with all the pictures and lengthy reporting.

    Law enforcement all over the world seem afraid of calling “jihad” what it really is. ….whether it is one person or many.

  11. jihad3tracker says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 11:38 am

    The “best” part of whatever can be gotten from the tragedy of Colleen Hufford’s pathologically-correct-Islam murder by Muhammad’s descendant in Oklahoma still is to happen :

    When Jah’Keem Yisrael makes court appearances for a charges and his plea. That face will be all over even mainstream privilege guilt media.

    If he is as emphatic about waging jihad during legal appearances as he was on Facebook, there will be one hell of a show.

    Any predictions here by JW readers on what sort of defense the inevitable lawyer or public defender will use ?

    • Charli Main says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 2:04 pm

      He didn´t have a teddy bear when he was 2 years old.
      He saw a strange man go into mummy´s bedroom when he was 5 years old.
      He didn´t have 200 dollar Nikes when he was 9 years old etc etc etc———–

      • Bettina says

        Sep 28, 2014 at 6:00 pm

        Love it, Charli 🙂

    • Mirren10 says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 2:32 pm

      ”Any predictions here by JW readers on what sort of defense the inevitable lawyer or public defender will use.”

      I think it will probably depend on whether this pos admits he did this for ‘allah’, or whether he plays the mental illness card.

      Lee Rigby’s murderers were totally frank about why they murdered him; indeed, it would have been very difficult to pretend another motive, given they were seen all over the world, on camera, quoting from the koran. However, as you can see from the link below, his barristers gave it a damn good try.

      http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/lee-rigby-murder-trial-michael-2937786

      I like Charli Main’s answer, though !

    • somehistory says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 2:35 pm

      They’ll say he was insane at the time of the murder and attempted murder and that all of his postings prove it. They’ll say that no sane person would say and do such things and use the “he was weird” quotes from the muslims who knew him as further proof.

      • jihad3tracker says

        Sep 28, 2014 at 4:25 pm

        Yes, I considered that use of an insanity defense is likely — IF HE PERMITS IT. There might be too deep a jihadist commitment by Yisrael to agree.

        And that is where “evidence” of mental instability would really break new ground regarding Islam’s essential duty toward Infidels.

        The Facebook pages have almost certainly been captured and preserved by law enforcement, thus are arguably relevant by BOTH prosecution & defense, in a trial.

        I am not a lawyer or expert — but here’s a dollars-to-donuts bet, folks : what we are going to eventually see unfolding will be one of the most riveting legal occurrences in history.

        • jihad3tracker says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 4:43 pm

          Just a tidbit of what might happen — this ought to guarantee that no Muslim taquiyya-slinger (like CAIR) gets ANY sleep for the next several months — while pre-trial events develop :

          Suppose imams and professors are subpoenaed to testify, because the core duties of a “good” Muslim (according to the Trilogy) must be factually determined for a finding of guilt or innocence in whatever charges are brought ?

          My ancient mind boggles at that astonishing possibility ! ! !

    • Jen says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 8:51 pm

      Hopefully the prosecution doesn’t buckle under pressure/threats by the Islamic community and fail to present the case CLEARLY to show the true motive was in fact jihad. Because the case could be framed in other ways where the prosecution still succeeds in getting a conviction (because it’s easy for them to show he was the killer), but while at the same time not strongly illustrating the nexus between jihad and what he did. I hope the prosecution paints him clearly as a devout follower of the principles of Islam and presents to the Court exactly what these are, not just gloss over this bit by showing him as a random savage who just “happened” to be a Muslim. Islamic texts= calls for violence = murdered to further cause of Islam in the US- this should be a core theme of the prosecution’s argument. Because how they frame it will affect the way the media reports on it. This guy should rightfully be held up as a prime example so this criminal case can be cited in future in public debate and strengthen the view that Islam is dangerous. Instead of Muslims having a rebuttal of “well actually, no, he was far away from Islam because the prosecution didn’t precisely argue that. He was just another crazy guy.”

      • jihad3tracker says

        Sep 28, 2014 at 9:14 pm

        Hello Jen —

        A “devout follower” prosecution would confront Islam with itself.

        • Jen says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 9:25 pm

          I said he should be shown in a very specific light. Prosecution wouldn’t *have* to confront Islam with itself to have him convicted and if it avoids the trouble of Muslims complaining about tainting their religion’s reputation, then it’s possible they might try to avoid that. That’s what I was saying. What are you meaning?

    • Bettina says

      Oct 12, 2014 at 3:59 pm

      Yeah, just watch them blaming workplace violence OR saying this guy was just another psycho.

  12. Jay Boo says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 11:47 am

    New convert gentlemen must always remember that the mosque washing area is for washing the exterior of the body to hide the awareness of what rots from within.
    Note: They must never assume that the row of spigots are for urinals, a common mistake.

  13. Jay Boo says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 11:55 am

    Islam’s Ponzi scheme must always seek out enemies or admit that the ideology of Islam’s Sharia Sorcerer Muhammad is bankrupt and meaningless.

    • Bettina says

      Oct 12, 2014 at 4:02 pm

      Yeah, they need enemies to “defend” islam… from what? What a bunch of paranoid freaks.

  14. Liza Jones says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 12:18 pm

    This story has not appeared in Canadian mainstream media either, and doubtless won’t , particularly the CBC which censors anything to do with painting Muslims in a bad light. I hope you can make it an issue on Sun News.
    The photograph on his website of the jihadi in gear with rifle and suicide vest is Abdel Majid Abdel Bary, the former would-be rapper and son of an Egyptian recently convicted in New York who had fought extradition from the UK. Bary is also suspected of being Jihadi John, the executioner of the US reporters and UK aid worker, although that has been called into question according to recent reports.

    • Bettina says

      Oct 12, 2014 at 4:06 pm

      Why would one beheading sadist matter more than all the others vying for the same privilege? We can go after one or two, but many other such animals are also in line to behead us infidels.

  15. wildjew says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 12:23 pm

    CNN writes: “Nolen’s Facebook page provides no indication he planned to attack anybody….”

    http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/27/us/oklahoma-beheading/

    • TH says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 1:16 pm

      What kind of brain do the CNN folks have. Do they think that anyone who is going to commit a crime is going to announce it on Facebook? What idiots!

      • wildjew says

        Sep 28, 2014 at 1:30 pm

        CNN, Aljazeera? What is the difference?

        • Jay Boo says

          Sep 28, 2014 at 3:53 pm

          Allah-Jazeera

  16. Arjay says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 1:25 pm

    A local newspaper is carrying this story- FINALLY and it is buried on a back page. It finally mentions towards the end of the article the beheader’s muslim affiliation. HOWEVER, it quotes the mosque he attended… and from the quote his fellow muslims in the congregation gave… it gives the impression they had distanced themselves from his “radicalness” and that his actions don’t represent the mosque.

    Really? Other articles from various anti-Jihadi sites show the truth how this mosque and its members supported, fed into, encouraged and enabled this man’s murderous Islamist beliefs.

    Sites like Jihadwatch are more important than ever.

  17. Walter Sieruk says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 2:09 pm

    The message of yesterday is important enough to reiterate. Which is that Murderous Muslim, Jah’Keem Yisrael, that in all fairness the Islamic organization C.A.I.R. did make some kind of half hearted denouncement of his violence and murder. Nevertheless, C.A.I.R ‘s denouncement had referred to this deadly guy as a “gentleman.” What an inappropriate word for to use for him. A choice of such a word says something about that group. Furthermore, the Quran does teach in 47:4 “Whenever you encounter the unbelievers strike off their heads…” That Muslim man did cut off a woman’s head.

  18. somehistory says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 2:45 pm

    When one is member of a group and doesn’t raise “any red flags” to other members of the group, perhaps it’s because that one is just like everyone else in the group.

  19. zulu says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 5:02 pm

    Fired Muslim convert store-worker who beheaded female colleague after losing his job was ‘shouting Islamic phrases’ as he carried out his bloody rampage

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2771940/Fired-Muslim-convert-store-worker-beheaded-female-colleague-lost-job-argument-stoning-women.html#ixzz3Ee8mUrPd
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    • gravenimage says

      Sep 29, 2014 at 4:13 pm

      I’ll bet that “Islamic phrase” was “Allahu Akbar!”.

  20. Ralph says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 5:17 pm

    “OK, Be-header”, here in the US we have been practicing with our ISIS Hunting License and we are ready for you Idiot Fools…

    https://www.youtube.com/embed/JOaiP7ZbfbI

    • jihad3tracker says

      Sep 28, 2014 at 8:57 pm

      Hello Ralph — THX hugely for a superb video ! ! That is going in my stash right next to the Terrorist Blooper pile.

      Now, where are tactical rifles priced below $2,500 ? ? Probably you and your buddies bought them all up long ago.

  21. Daniel Triplett says

    Sep 28, 2014 at 7:32 pm

    Major components of Islam frequently repeated in the Quran are Sedition and Conspiracy to Murder.

    Sedition and Conspracy to Murder are already crimes. These crimes are what Islam is all about and can’t be separated from it. Islam wouldn’t be Islam and wouldn’t exist if we removed these principle tenets.

    Moreover, because Muslims believe the Quran is the literal word of their deity, they’d never agree to such reformation, for that would contradict Allah’s divine providence in their minds. No one gets to debate Allah.

    The problem is the government doesn’t want to call out Islam for the crimes it advocates, still parroting the “religion of peace” crap.

    If we can’t already criminalize Islam altogether under existing Constitutional law, then we should amend our Constitution. The US is a government by and for the people, and one of these days we’re collectively going to have enough of it, see the light, and confront “Islam.” Whether it takes an honest POTUS explaining this to the people, or a nuke glassing Manhattan, one of these days the American people will galvanize against this extraordinary threat.

    Islam has declared war on the United States, regardless of whether our politicians want to acknowledge this reality.

    Islam is our enemy. It’s nothing we must tolerate. Islam is a criminal enterprise and enemy we must not tolerate.

  22. gravenimage says

    Sep 29, 2014 at 4:18 pm

    OK beheader: “Sharia law is coming!” — posted photos of beheadings on FB
    …………………………….

    This foul Jihadist was absolutely explicit about this actions—and his belief that beheading innocent Infidels would lead directly to the imposition of Shari’ah law.

    The imposition of Islamic law, in fact, is what all Jihad terror is intended to achieve.

  23. Elizabeth says

    Sep 29, 2014 at 6:47 pm

    If Sharia attempts to come to the US there are people that will meet them in the streets with violence. If the muslims rise up in this country they’ll be met sooner or later with the same treatment they are meeting out to others.

    • Elizabeth says

      Sep 29, 2014 at 7:11 pm

      And I don’t mean that I advocate for such a thing. I listen to radio, read info online and I can see that there are people that don’t like what’s going on in all aspects of our society, our government, overseas, and within the muslim community in our nation and around the world. People are talking and there’s so much division.

      • MacUalraig says

        Sep 30, 2014 at 7:54 am

        Elizabeth,

        I DO advocate for such a thing! I would have advocated for Colleen Hufford had she presented a blade and beheaded the man that assaulted her instead!

        When totalitarians that threaten our children & grandchildren with slavery reach that critical mass, there WILL be free men who’ve spent their whole lives fighting ready. And I am one, among many, who will kill as many men as necessary to ensure the natural human rights enumerated in the U.S.C. are preserved for future generations of free humans.

        In fact, we’re ready now.

        You sound uncertain. Don’t be. My humble grasp tells me the engineer of this place created a world where men & women have to perennially fight for their freedom to freely inquire. This struggle against totalitarianism is regular and ongoing. It’s where geniuses, heroes, saints, angels and gods are born.

        They’re born in the struggle to push the limits of their inquiry and imagination.

        Don’t despair, The West has its savages, its Infidel Savages that it will unleash in its own good time.

      • MacUalraig says

        Sep 30, 2014 at 8:15 am

        Furthermore, MARK VAUGHN IS A HERO OF THE FREE WORLD.

        Wish I had an image of him on a hoodie that I could wear when I walked into to my gym when I warm up, just to get my mind right, to get mind focused on the mission before I start some good ball-busting PT.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • Dude on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Mojdeh on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.