The ACLU objected, you see: the civil liberties of those U.S. citizens who have declared war against the United States must be preserved. And when the dead bodies are being counted, I hope the ACLU and Senator Mazie Hirono will stand up and take a bow. “Senator BLOCKS Ted Cruz bill to seize passports from ISIS fighters who return to the US,” by David Martosko, Daily Mail, September 18, 2014 (thanks to Jerk Chicken):
A showdown over the passports of so called ‘foreign fighters’ – Americans and other westerners who have joined the ISIS terror army in Iraq and Syria – came to a head on Thursday when a U.S. senator killed legislation aiming to strip them of their citizenship.
Democrat Mazie Hirono, a freshman senator from Hawaii, objected on the Senate floor when Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas tried to fast-track his ‘Expatriate Terrorists Act.’
Cruz bypassed the Senate’s committee process in order to rush the legislation to a vote, meaning that any single senator could block it.
Since the Senate is sprinting through its final days in session this year, he said, putting the bill through committee ‘would mean that it could not pass in time to prevent Americans fighting right now with ISIS from coming back and murdering other Americans.’
Hawaii Democratic Sen. Mazie Hirono blocked the legislation, saying she and other Democrats wanted more time — and likely pushing the issue off until after the November elections
‘There is an urgency and an exigency to this situation,’ Cruz said on the Senate floor.
Hirono said she chose to throw up a road block because ‘legislation that grants the government the ability to strip citizenship from Americans is a serious matter raising significant constitutional issues.’
She also cited letters of objection from the Constitution Project and the American Civil Liberties Union.
The question of what to do about ISIS-aligned foreign fighters who have U.S. passports has occupied the attention of the FBI, the Homeland Security Department and the State Department, which issues passports and can revoke them if a judge agrees there’s a compelling reason.
In testimony Thursday before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Secretary of State John Kerry argued that the U.S. needs ‘to stop the foreign fighters who carry passports from countries around the world including the United States.’
‘What I want to make certain, Kerry told the congressional panel, ‘is that anybody who has a passport [and joins with ISIS] ‘who returns, returns in handcuffs – not through customs with their passport.’…
Angemon says
What’s so hard to understand? Those people who went and joined ISIS (an organization professedly anti-american), temporarily or otherwise, have, for all intents and purposes, turned their backs on their country and to the values it stands for. If you’re queasy about stripping their citizenship then at the very least revoke their passports and as soon as they set foot on US soil have them arrested and judged for treason.
Bettina says
Thanks, Angemon — I didn’t realize the difference between stripping their citizenship, and revoking their passports until you brought up this fine line.
EYESOPEN says
You are absolutely correct Angemon. And oh, BTW, the ACLU was a communist-originated group whose very purpose was to take down the U.S.A. and its Constitution, not to mention destroy our nation’s very solid Judeo-Christian roots.
Bettina says
Why don’t we create a petition to support Ted Cruz’ plan to strip citizenship from those jihadis?
I’ll let you know if I’m successful in starting one…
dumbledoresarmy says
Don’t just do a petition.
Every US jihadwatcher here present posting or lurking has to write to the Congress and Senate about this Bill.
Write to your own particular congresscritters and senators, stating your support for this proposed measure, and demanding that all American-passport-holding Muslims who are known to be wallowing in the jihad bloodbath in Syria or in Iraq, should be stripped of their citizenship, their passports rendered null and void, so that they may be at all costs prevented from returning into either the USA or indeed into any *other* non-Muslim country. An alternative to stripping of citizenship is that the person concerned could be declared Exile and / or Outlaw.
If the politicians addressed don’t reply, or say no it can’t be done, write again. And I mean *write* – use a postcard or send an actual individual letter, with a stamp, signed.
And again and again and again and again and again.
“No jihadi beheaders and assistant beheaders and cheerers-on of beheading should be permitted to return to carry out beheadings on American soil”.
Bettina says
Very, very nice, DDA! I’ve never thought of doing it the old snail-mail way, instead of using the easy way online in their websites.
Btw, I tried initiating a petition on Change.org and was stopped after I hit Submit. Do you think their PC mentality got the best of me?
Brazooka says
Membership in the ACLU criminal organization should itself entail loss of citizenship.
Oliver says
A few years ago, there was a book review in the Wall Street Journal, (print edition) –a book written about the ACLU–and a person who was -once- a memebr of the (as i recall the review, never read the book) in the inenr circle.
Basically, what the author claimed, the ACLE ( American Criminal Liberties Union- am I correct?) top people DID NOT ALLWO debate, discussion or dissention.
That it was a dictatorship
If anyone knows the name of the book, please post.
Thank you
jewdog says
Maybe it can be arranged that they all go back to Hawaii.
“So where are you going, Mr. Returning ISIS Jihadi?”
“Oh, I beheading to Hawaii.”
Richie says
but it is already law that if an American fights in a foreign amy, they lose their citizenship- its says that in passports.
How about we follow laws on the books?
rabrooks says
Don’t seize the passports, seize the people! Once again, the failure to enforce the laws on the books! The laws were written long ago and should make it a moot issue! If and when they come back, they know what awaits them! I believe that the issue trancends stupidity, but becomes an intentional attempt to subvert the constitution…..
How could any senator not know this?
Bettina says
People with dual citizenship are not considered traitors when they enlist with the Israeli army. It’s probably the same thing with others holding dual passports.
Bettina says
I didn’t mean to invalidate your post, Richie. Of course, enlisting with an enemy state is traitorous. I just meant to add a general clarification of those who also possess another citizenship with countries with which the US has that agreement.
Rob says
A lot of countries are dealing with this situation right now.
Cancelling a passport is one thing, but revoking citizenship is another. Doing the latter effectively makes the person stateless.
A passport is held at the discretion of the government. In mine (not US) the Head of State requests that I be granted the privilege of safe travel.
dumbledoresarmy says
But these creatures *are* stateless.
The only law that they recognise as legit is the sharia of Islam. The only political authority they recognise as having a right to rule is an Islamic authority.
They view *all other* states – infidel states – as fundamentally illegitimate entities, with no right to exist and no right to enact laws. Many are, today, prepared to take *advantage * – without shame – of the temporary and tactical conveniences of citizenship status within this or that Infidel country, but they do not recognise those infidel countries as legitimate and their loyalty to such countries, or states, is not to be relied upon.
So rendering them stateless, in the infidel sense, is merely to recognise what is in fact the case.
Laura says
Yes, they don’t recognise national borders, only the world that belongs to their god…so let Allah issue them with a special dispensation to travel.
Rob says
Yeah but given the Muslim traits of claiming victimhood they can make all the noise they want on the Caliphate yet demand the protection of a US or Australian passport – all at the same time.
voegelinian says
“But these creatures *are* stateless.
The only law that they recognise as legit is the sharia of Islam. The only political authority they recognise as having a right to rule is an Islamic authority.”
And how are they different from all other Muslims in this regard? The no-nonsense Counter-Jihadists are quick to ridicule the specious distinction between ISIS and Islam; but what about bringing the rubber to the road and dealing with the specious difference between the ISIS Jihadists and all other Muslims? Of course, there exists a whole galaxy of superficial factors which the asymptotic Counter-Jihadist, anxious to maintain such a distinction, will be able to avail himself of in his anxious desire to spare so many Muslims from such a “broad brush” (and thus, more importantly, to spare his own ethical narcissism). But is he able to do so cogently and coherently?
WVinMN says
Yeah, it’s called TREASON, and thus declaring these SOB’s “stateless” is actually granting them a pass on swinging from a tree.
Bonnie Loranger says
ISIS will give them a passport. They can stay and live with ISIS forever.
ProudInfidel 1 says
These TRAITORS won’t be “stateless” if we remove both their passports and citizenship…………….. after all, they will still have their wonderful “Islamic state”…………………… you know, the one they have betrayed their allegiance to the United States for…………….
We have a lot of these same morons in Canada, where citizens can hold dual citizenship (Canadian citizenship and citizenship of their country of birth) and we are increasingly starting to remove passports, deport and remove CANADIAN citizenship from these dual citizenship terrorists. Next challenge we face is a constitutional amendment to permit the removal of citizenship from Canadian-born traitors. Coming soon we hope!
Wtf? says
Whilst IS is winning most of them have no intention of returning. However as the scales are tipped back the other way and they start noticeably losing many will desert(some already are) and others will be sent back to do specific harm. These people will be defeated as they are trying to defend territory and are counting on a wave of global support. As they suffer damage and casualties they will then move back to guerrilla warfare. Subsequently like a sporting team with a losing streak many of the cheerleaders will slink away. This is the major battle looming as Islam has everything to lose regardless of the outcome. If they hang onto their territory through ongoing brutality how long before those affected rise up? Additionally they have created a PR nightmare for anyone trying to market Islam. If they lose it puts Islam back a thousand years.
Jay Boo says
Hillary and Obama cozying up to Muslim Brotherhood Morsi followed by their Benghazi backstab should warrant revoking their passports.
mortimer says
The American government needs to devise a strategy so that the same jihadists will only be fought ONCE.
Otherwise, they will be a repeated problem. Exile for jihadists is the only reasonable answer to eliminating their threat. Exile is the only thing they fear.
BW022 says
Meanwhile… Canada passed bill C-24 in June which allows the Canadian Immigration Minister to remove Canadian citizenship from any dual-citizen convicted of international terrorism and human rights violations.
I guess Canadians don’t believe in freedom, constitutional law, human rights, etc., etc.? Or else they are just sick of Kadar-types coming back to Canada.
Rainman says
This is easy enough. Just put them on the no fly list. If they wanna go to Syria, they gotta swim there and back.
Rainman…..
duh_swami says
None of that Constitution stuff got in the way when Rasool O zapped Awlaki.
I think there is a law, or there should be a law, that makes it a crime for a citizen to go to another country to commit murder and other crimes and come back immune from any kind of justice.
John Chan says
Senator Mazie Hirono wake up. You think living in Hawaii will be safe? IS will be taking a swim there very soon…..then what ?
Edward Cline says
What? ISIS killers can swim? Do they actually bathe? I wouldn’t think so. Anyway, you’re right. They can make their way to Hawaii just as easily as they can to Manhattan or Isle of Wight, England. The only physical impediment that might stop them is a burst from a 50 caliber gun.
Rezali Mehil says
procrastinating….it is what the kufr is all about.
The Byzantine has much modern weaponry and fire power – but I cannot find it on a map today – nor what it it stood for, nor what it’s religion was – Islam rules there.
Procrastination in Kufr land is calling out for the discipline of Islam – you gotta love the procrastinating minister….
As Mr Spencer said …take a bow.
More Later….
Rezali
JIMJFOX says
Don’t bother……
Bettina says
You sound incoherent, Reza. Or, are do you write here only when you’re drunk or on drugs? Get sober, get some brains and lucidity or stop posting here.
I know, I know — that’s way too much to ask from a moron like you.
SpiritOf1683 says
Not incoherent but totally insane.
gravenimage says
Rezali Mehil isn’t drunk or on drugs, Bettina—this is what a mind on Islam looks like. *Ugh*.
gravenimage says
The vicious Rezali Mehil wrote:
procrastinating….it is what the kufr is all about.
…………………………….
This pious Muslimah is sneering at Infidels being slow to go to war. And why not? Muslims *love* slaughter, so the idea of being loath to engage in it is utterly foreign to her, and she can only regard it as a weakness.
More:
The Byzantine has much modern weaponry and fire power – but I cannot find it on a map today – nor what it it stood for, nor what it’s religion was – Islam rules there.
…………………………….
Here she is, sneering at the lands that Islam has already ruined—and threatening us with the same. *Ugh*.
More:
Procrastination in Kufr land is calling out for the discipline of Islam – you gotta love the procrastinating minister….
…………………………….
“Discipline of Islam”—that means untrammeled savagery, aimed at anyone considered weak or vulnerable. *Ugh*.
We can all see how Muslims have become emboldened by the savagery of the Islamic State—even Shia like Rezali Mehil, whom are also victims of this barbaric state.
But what does she care—as long as she believes her vile creed is spreading, and that most of the threat is to the “filthy Kuffar”?
Navy Vet says
RETARD!
pongidae rex says
Just because someone attends the Islamic Human Slaughter Festival in Syria and discovers that they enjoy butchering people alive, what is the problem? People attend foreign music and cultural festivals all the time. What is wrong with a Human Slaughter Festival? This is cultural discrimination against Muslims! Thank God for the ACLU keeping watch and protecting us.
Oliver says
I do not think that the problem is that these assholes go to the Just because someone attends the Islamic Just because someone attends the Islamic .
I see the problem is one of two.
1. They themselves did not (also) get killed or
2. They return.
If they get killed-fine and dandy, no issue./
the problem is, they want to return.
That is how I see it.
And, the bad news, the last figures I saw (unverified of course, like all Muslim figures) is that ONLY some 200,000 people were killed in Syria.
Question: Where is the Useless Nationas and their (In)security Cioucil going to hold hearings and condemn both sides.? In Gaza, israel fighting a defensive war-after thousands of rockets are fired at it, and (supposedly) 2,000 palestinians are killed, the Useless nations and their delegates have their panties in a knot (or is that sexists?). With one of the funniest-the UN A,bassador from Ruwanda or Burundi (where thousands of Hutus killed Tutsis or was it the other way around, or did they kill each other?) said Israel should show restraint. Hey, why not look in your own backyard, creeps.
devonoagon says
Folks, precedence in the U.S. for cancelling a passport has already been set. Doesn’t anyone remember Eric Snowden? His passport was cancelled when he exposed the NSA scandal. Of course these passports of American jihadis can be cancelled and should be. Of course I’ll be contacting Senators Chuck (self loathing jew) Schumer (D-NY), Kristen (big hipped Schumer lap-dog) Gillenbrand (D-NY) and Congresswoman Grace Meng (D-NY) to get on this right away. By the way…I’m still waiting for a response from Senator Schumer’s office about an issue I sent to him back in 2004.
JeffS says
Funny that Gillenbrand was one the 22 Senators that voted against Obama’s “funding the jihadis” bill. As a far-leftist, I wonder what her reasoning was. I doubt it was good reasoning.
Oliver says
Schmuck Schumer is too busy worrying about, and trying to pass legislation to preb=vent –happening again, the great American tradedy.
SCALPERS WERE ASKING FOR A PREMIUM FOR NEIL DIAMOND CONCERT TICKETS.
He actually called for Congressional hearings on this urgent matter a few years ago.
And, to shwo the Democratic party os the party of the people, standing up for what is right, Sen Booker (D-NJ-) wants to strip the NFL of tax exemptions-I guess because of allegations about Rice and the fellow on the Vikings.
(I thought that they were being paid big v=bucks to paly football; why the scrutiny of their private lives?)
(For role models, CHILDREN SHOULD HAVE PARENTS, TO IDOLIZE, NOT OVER PAIDED ATHLETES).
My views.
Edward Cline says
Oh, yes, the ACLU is a veritable font of wisdom, right in there to fight the good fight for…collectivists, statists, and for American traitors who join an enemy that has declared war on the U.S. and want to return to fight and kill and maim Americans here. Good work, Senator Hirono! You make us so proud…and safe!
dunk says
Ms .Hirono, I live as a guest in Japan and enjoy it, because as far as i can see they really do not care what is your belief,thinking,attitude is , as long as you do not break the law of the country, or endanger same. That is right and simple ,if somebody try to overthrow a system by which 98% ,my guestimate ,are quite happy to deal with in daily life,means to me the others go, they can not, and will not contribute positively for the mutual and benefit.Simply they do not belong
jimjames says
Something in my memory recalls that all US Federal Government employees which includes soldiers, sailors, marines and members of the Congress, Executive and Judicial branches of government that they are sworn to “protect and defend”… “against all enemies domestic and foreign”- So everybody who voted for this legislation has violated their oath of office and are subject to criminal action.
DiMu says
I guess it’s payback for the internment of the Japanese!
SpiritOf1683 says
It seems as if the US is determined to stay one step ahead of Sweden in the race to disaster no matter what. How can you expect to win a war for survival when you’re so adept at shooting yourselves in the foot?
phil in boston says
the woman’s a fool. yes, she’s Japanese-American and extra “sensitive” to constitutional issues and doubtless thinking of prejudice and the interned Japanese in WWII. but the issue at hand is a clear emergency and not ethnically orientated, so there is no racial prejudice– jihadis could be brainwashed whites, blacks, whatever.
Another point, begun by wtf above: once ISIS is defeated, many will seek cover and slink back to their original homes, waiting for another day. Furthermore, as we know how slow the wheels of justice turn, this whole topic of revoking passports and citizenship will disappear from the front pages, the NYT and Boston Globe and other uber-liberal rags will pontificate against rightwing extremism, the ACLU and CAIR will keep the case bottled up in the courts, Americans will lose interest… Conclusion: instead of striking while the iron is hot, the momentum will be lost and the jihadi bastards will NOT lose their passports and citizenship.
Justice delayed is justice denied! Thank you senator jackass from Hawaii.
Bettina says
Very well put, Phil! Sure hope that in the long run, your political forecast will be proven wrong.
epistemology says
Same as in Europe. In the UK and Germany sensible people have been thinking about revoking the citizenship of these barbarians, but the “human rights” activists say this can’t be done, as the citizenship is an unalienable right. Bullshit!
Sandra Bamford says
What is Senator Hirono’s religion of choice? Just curious.
John C. Barile says
Go back to your sewer. This isn’t Stormfront.
omega2 says
Here we go again! A great proposal was made to pull all passports of returning JIHADI’S by Sen. Ted Cruz, and a STUPID DUMBOCRUD blocks it as they are all for open borders and bringing in MUZZIES from all over the world with out checking them out! SECURITY IN THERE MIND MEANS NOTHING!
JeffS says
She’s Tokyo Rose.
Bettina says
Correction: If you google ACLU you’ll find that they are a SECULAR organization, fighting for (their take on) civil rights, and laying that flag of protection over all US residents — illegals, non-citizens, etc. That includes protecting jihadis from our right to pull passports and citizenships.
As a Jew, I advocate for Israel and the rights of all Jews to live in peace in their respective countries — in which they always assimilate like no other minorities.
Your mistake in thinking sweepingly that ACLU is a Jewish org is likely due to some leftist Jewish lawyers working for them. I said “SOME,” so shove your ignorance and sit on it.
Other Correction, to “what is the Jew angle…” Proper English is “what is the Jewish angle,” Jewish being the adjective to qualify the angle. You’re being pejorative toward us when you say “the Jew angle.” Sounds creepy and dripping with anti-Semitism.
Is that what you are? A Jew hater?
SpiritOf1683 says
ACLU specialises in moral equivalence, and moral equivalence favours the truly evil.
Jay Boo says
Maybe I am missing something but …
Can you say stinking leftist hypocritical atheists?
Oklahoma
ACLU Fights 10 commandments
ACLU supports Sharia Law
http://news.msn.com/us/ten-commandments-marker-can-stay-at-oklahoma-capitol-judge
https://www.aclu.org/religion-belief/bans-sharia-and-international-law
Jay Boo says
Note:
meaning ‘you’ in the general sense not in the personal sense
Jay Boo says
SpiritOf1683
I hope my post did not cause any confusion
I clicked on recent comment link and saw the acronym ACLU
coincidentally I had recently come across ACLU links listed
jimjames says
Just for a little “historical” angle. I knew of a good number of lawyers who were from The Lawyers Guild and also members of and supporters of the ACLU back in the mid-70s. They were seen by marxists as “useful idiots”. Now the reference is “moral equivalence”. No problem with the “moral equivalence” tag but the political thinking of these people is way left of center. (“useful idiots” is a quote from Lenin when talking about building a wide coalition of groups -like “liberals” or ‘progressives”- to promote “socialism” i.e. to prepare for bolshevism to undermine bourgeois democracy.) While the”left” has been in concert with the islamists for a few decades already they have coalesced with something more radical and fanatical then they are themselves. As “useful idiots” are among the first to be done away with after “the revolution” so now after islamists gain control marxists etc. are then still infidels and subject to the same fate. Both marxism and islamists are conflict theorists and so there is never an end to conflict that is, until they totally self-destruct.
John C. Barile says
Yes, Bettina; that is what he is.
Oliver says
John C. B.
I agree totally with you, regarding the creep Celt anal (the nickname here and in my other post is my opinion of his comment).
Lion Rampant says
I think the word for this senator is , clueless.
All rights pertaining to citizenship are subject to certain conditions;
Treason being the most obvious one.
Is Civics still being taught in American classrooms ?
Also I have never liked the idea of dual citizenship and there are countries
who do not recognise it.
I am rapidly coming around to the idea of an ‘IS’ state, entry only and those wishing to emulate the caliphate elsewhere be flown over the new state equipped
only with a static-line parachute. Have the area continuously televised and let the games begin. Laissez les bon tetes roulez.
gravenimage says
More disgusting antisemitism from “Nordicelt”. Really, the only time he ever posts here it is to spread his vile hatred of Jews.
I doubt standing up against the threat of Jihad is actually a concern of his at all.
Oliver says
Nordasshole
I beleive one of the prime leaders (heads) of the ACLUE is or was a man of Puerto Rican descent, and born Catholic. (That was the case a few years ago, and I believe that this person is still the head ).
John M. Oda says
Who the hell is this cow and who voted her in the office? She is a TOTAL STRANGER TO THE WORLD PROBLEMS! I say, listen you old cow, you seem to be a total ignorant and stupid about the world problems, so, just stay out of it and keep doing your shitty work! It seems to me that she only know what is going around her neighborhood and nothing else. I ask her, WOULD YOU LIKE TO GATHER ALL THE TERRORISTS IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD? Maybe, this will give you and idea who the terrorists are and what they would do to you and your neighborhood! When you jeopardize your country, your city and neighborhood, then there is no CIVIL LIBERTY left in you! You should be put in jail and charged with treason because it seems to me that you don’t know what is going on EVEN IN YOUR OWN NEIGHBORHOOD! These are the IDIOTS that are VOTED INTO THE GOVERNMENT OFFICES!!
SallyA says
Ted Cruz and the rest of the Senate, red and blue sides from Hawaii or elsewhere, are posturing as usual for the ill-informed American voters.
Under existing federal regulations the State Department (22 CFR 51.60-65) may, assuming that it is willing, deny (or later revoke) a passport on the grounds that: “The Secretary determines that the applicant’s [or passport holder’s] activities abroad are causing or are likely to cause serious damage to the national security or the foreign policy of the United States.”
http://travel.state.gov/content/passports/english/passports/information/legal-matters/passpoirt-information-for-criminal-law-enforcement-officers.html states: “When the Department revokes a U.S. passport, revocation information is shared through various databases accessible by law enforcement and various border agencies around the world to prevent persons from traveling on revoked passports.”
Obviously by failure to act where there is regulatory authority to do so (and expedited judicial processes available if a court order would serve to expedite) the Obama administration’s State Dept. does not want to revoke the passports of U.S. Muslims who have gone to fight with either IS or the Syrian “rebels” Obama is arming. The Syrians will ultimately default to join IS, too, or some renamed version of Islamic jihad, after the U.S. taxpayers have armed and trained our enemy and its U.S. passport holders in Syria through the bad decisions of Obama and the Congress that supports him and the global oligarchy’s Caliphate, not us.
We in the U.S. are living in a virtual dictatorship on everything important to life and liberty. Only consumer details, like which new phone to buy, are left to us in propaganda America, land of media, home of the brainwashed.
Bob says
We can not start a petition? If we write will they read it? I say mail them a letter every day for a month. fill their in boxes snail and email. Fill their phone lines, march DC, their local state offices, till they get the point. Keep it single minded. Do not waiver off onto other issues. Simple we do not want terrorist ISIS fighters allowed back in our country. right?
Philip Smeeton says
The only solution to our domestic Islamic problem is deportation. Internationally: Stay well out and let Muslims sort out their own mess. There are many Muslim countries, let them take in Muslim refugees.
Oliver says
Mr. Smeeton,
i agree with you. But–your last point-
Let the Muslim countries take in Muslim refugees.
THEY DO NOT WANT THEM.
JUST LOOK AT THE LAST 67 AND (ALMOST) 5 MONTHS.
in May 1947, Israel was established. Population-a few hundred thousand; and the Muslims left.
Israel took in MILLIONS from Europe; the death camp survivors, etc. israel has about 3.5% of the land in the Middle East.
The Muslim states, with the other 96+% of the land have NOT taken in their Muslim ” brothers’, letting them live in ‘ the refugee” camps.
Some of these Muslim countries are amongst the elast densely populated; ( and also quite abckard, but that is not for here) and RICH–like the Gulf states; Saudi Arabia; Kuwait,, etc.
Yet they do nothing for their Muslim brothers.
Israel, in ONE WEEKEND, took in thousands of Ethiopian jews, in the greatest/largest airlift (of people) in history. And the Muslims, in 67+ years cannott ake in UNDER 1 MILLION of their fellow Muslims, in 57 (Obama’s number of states–the number of Islamic states).
So, why would they take in their brother Muslims thrown out of western countries?