In late September, the Islamic State’s spokesman, Abu Muhammad Al-Adnani, urged Muslims to murder non-Muslims in the West. “Rely upon Allah,” he thundered, “and kill him in any manner or way however it may be. Do not ask for anyone’s advice and do not seek anyone’s verdict. Kill the disbeliever whether he is civilian or military, for they have the same ruling.” He also addressed Western non-Muslims: “You will not feel secure even in your bedrooms. You will pay the price when this crusade of yours collapses, and thereafter we will strike you in your homeland, and you will never be able to harm anyone afterwards.”
“Man attacks New York police officers with hatchet,” by Shimon Procupez, CNN, October 23, 2014:
(CNN) — A man charged at four New York police officers Thursday afternoon, metal hatchet in hand, hitting one officer in the right arm and another in the head, the city’s police commissioner said.
The two officers who weren’t struck shot and killed the suspect, who has not been identified by name and is believed to be about 32 years old, according to police Commissioner Bill Bratton
The police officer who was struck in the head remains in critical but stable condition.
Authorities are looking to see if the unprovoked attack, in the New York borough of Queens, is tied to recent calls by radicals to attack military and police officers, law enforcement officials say.
Asked about a possible connection to terrorism, Bratton said, “There is nothing we know as of this time that would indicate that were the case. I think certainly the heightened concern is relative to that type of assault based on what just happened in Canada.”…
In the New York attack, the officers were posing for a photo when the man carrying a 18.5-inch-long hatchet charged them, Bratton said….
Jaladhi says
There are those telltale signs of beard and green jacket. Infer what you want. Islamic apologists are already dreaming up excuses for Muslims!! Nothing to do with Islam – just these terrorists being produced in a vacuum, they are not learning Islam from those peaceful mosques teach nothing but peace.
If anyone believes that there is a Brooklyn bridge for sale!!
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
I’m from Queens, grew up in Bayside. And this enrages me.
We are going to need, eventually, to outlaw the practice of Islam, altogether. Yes: I know that sounds outrageous. But the only thing MORE outrageous than that is the spectacle of the West sitting around with its thumbs up its you-know-what, waiting for the next attack.
Just as we restrict the 1st Amendment re: Speech (you can’t yell, ‘Fire!’ in a crowded theater), we’ll have to restrict this horrifying ‘religion’. Geert Wilders has the right idea.
It’s either that or permit this monstrosity to flourish among us.
Beagle says
Is it that outrageous? Maybe, but you are merely asking for what Muslims demand in Israel. Population transfers due to conflict are not even in the top two or three really bad outcomes when people fight, really fight.
If Islam continues waging asymmetric war against the world, concentrating them in the Dar al-Islam is a humane outcome to what I keep reading in comments sections everywhere. People are, understandably, getting fed up with Muslim whining and aggression.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
Beagle, you get it. So do most here.
But oh! We’re so much better informed than lots of Americans; whenever I see one of those ‘man in the street’ things I about die…
Again: it all comes down to whom we all elect. I do think the Republicans will eclipse the Dems this election. But what kind of political will do the R’s even have? Alas! Most of them are limited to ‘willing’ their next election.
Well: We-the-people will stay on the job. Or we won’t. If the latter, we deserve what we get.
God Save These United States.
dlbrand says
Indeed. For this is basic Islam in practice.
Huck Folder says
“In the New York attack, the officers were posing for a photo when the man carrying a 18.5-inch-long hatchet charged them, Bratton said….”
An accomplice?
dlbrand says
My thoughts, precisely.
Set up for the hit.
Tradewinds says
You are right, Kathy. Islam will have to be outlawed as it commands Muslims to kill non-Muslims, called Jihad. For that reason alone non-Muslims always have to live in fear of Muslims. This has got to stop. Islam has got to go.
Islofob IS-1 says
“Kathy Brown, Esq.”
Yes, you are correct, it is the only answer.
Many are trying to find a way for islam to live freely here, and it will only bring doom and death. the “faith” of islam, as it is currently followed from the qur’an, must be outlawed .
The only question to ask those who think otherwise is,
“have you had enough yet?” They will hear it a lot from you.
Yes, islam is the enemy.
UnEasyOne says
First, we have to recognize that islam is not a religion, but an authoritarian and subversive political ideology. Second, we have to recognize that every muslim is a potential fifth columnist. Even if they are as peaceful as Ghandi, they outbreed us and their children are taught that Mohammed, the pedophile, rapist, murdering, head chopping conqueror, was the perfect man, who must be emulated. Even if they teach them peace, all they have to do is read the koran and hadiths. When they discover the truth, surprise! Suddenly they become “radicals.”
I don’t believe in burning books, though these particular books are a temptation. But it wouldn’t do any good anyway. I also don’t believe in keeping a couple dozen rattlesnakes in a flimsy cage in my bedroom.
muslims must publicly renounce the evil deeds of Mohammed or leave the country. If we want the constitution to survive.
They have a long term strategy; they won’t be easier to uproot, 10, 20 or 50 years from now. Nobody, IMHO, has laid it all out better than David Wood in his video, “The Three stages of islam.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERou_Q5l9Gw#t=21
IS has made a huge tactical mistake in showing the world islam’s true face. WE HAVE TO STOP OR POLITICIANS attempts, LEFT AND RIGHT. to separate IS from islam. If we can prevent that, we can win the war in this country fairly cheaply. If we don’t, we’re probably doomed – and we probably deserve it.
EYESOPEN says
Here’s my $.02 on the issue:
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights should be amended as follows:
The United States of America is, by its very nature, a very tolerant nation. We tolerate – and welcome – many different peoples of many different faiths who sincerely desire to become Americans and live in peace within our society. However, what this nation – and this Constitution – will NOT tolerate are peoples – and so-called religions – that are inherently hostile to this nation, its laws and its Constitution, and seek to undermine and/or supplant this Constitution and our representative form of government.
Any such people who are hostile to this nation and its Constitutional laws should be removed – deported to wherever they came from. If these individuals became nationalized U.S. citizens, their citizenship should be revoked and they should be subsequently deported to their nation of origin. If these individuals were born as U.S. citizens, again, their citizenship should be invalidated and they should be deported to whatever nation carries the same antipathy against this nation and our Constitution and its laws.
Furthermore, any institutions or organizations that serve those who are hostile to this nation and its laws should become illegal, and any edifices owned by those same institutions or organizations demolished. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution gives a very wide latitude to religious freedom; but it was never intended to become a suicide pact.
UnEasyOne says
Excellent comment and I agree with most of it, except this: There is no need to amend the Bill of Rights or the first amendment, BECAUSE ISLAM IS NOT A RELIGION, BUT A SUBVERSIVE POLITICAL/MILITARY IDEOLOGY MASKING ITSELF IN THE CLOAK OF A RELIGION – WITH THE INTENT OF REPLACING OUR CONSTITUTION AND LEGAL SYSTEM WITH SHARIA. We would need official recognition of that fact, starting with the IRS stripping them of their tax exemption…
If necessary, we could try to pass an amendment, but that takes time and isn’t[ even close to a sure thing – especially since enormous resources would be poured into protesting AND DEFEATING THAT AMENDMENT BY THE SAUDIS AND OTHERS WOULD BE THE #1 PRIORITY. Can you imagine the protests and/or pretty CAIR spokesgirls on TV pleading for “Justice?”
Unless they publicly acknowledge the crimes of Mohammed , rape, slaughtering helpless captives, pedophilia, assassination of critics
UnEasyOne says
…slave trading, abusing and raping and his many other crimes, making them apostate, they have no vusiness mixing with decent people.
Higzy says
“…officers were posing for a photo when the man carrying a 18.5-inch-long hatchet charged them…”
And that’s the end of the story? What happened next? Some shoddy news reporting ..to say the least. FAIL
wildjew says
I guess it will be discussed in the following days, what this newly elected New York mayor has done in terms of changing the way police profile or investigate Muslims, mosques, etc. in New York.
wildjew says
Islamic State savages are NOT afraid of Barack Obama or they would not be instigating these atrocities.
steve c. says
Islamic extremists are not afraid of Obama, just as Nazi soldiers were not afraid of Moussolini…
William says
That’s right! He’s one o’ them.
UnEasyOne says
Obama is christian. Don’t you understand that we have to unite as AMERICANS to defeat this evil? Pappy Bush is an old friend of the Bin Ladins, the family home in Saudi Arabia is his home away from home – and W started pushing that religion of peace crap while the ruins of 9/11 were still smoldering – you know, while he was smuggling the Bin Ladin family out of the country, but before he held hands with the Saudi king? Clinton attacked the wrong side in Serbia (although he should have let it be known that the atrocities wouldn’t be tolerated. And Reagan gave Al Queida it’s start with arms and training.
This is NOT a right/left issue. ALL our politicians are propagandists for our implacable enemy. Unless we unite as AMERICANS (and that goes for other countries too, but I live here) they will beat us.
Divided, we will fall.
dumbledoresarmy says
You know what interests me about this? The reaction of the cops and the outcome.
Because *I* think that down at street level, Infidel cops and soldiers are – consciously or subconsciously – beginning to make the decision that anyone attacking or threatening to attack who might be a Mohammedan had better be eliminated, FAST. Like, killed dead.
First case: Australia. Muslim with knife goes berserk, badly wounds one Aussie cop, attacks the other, while he’s attacking one cop the other – wounded – cop takes out his gun and BLAM! saves his mate *and* gets rid of the Mohammedan, permanent-like.
Second case: Canada. Muslim in car runs over two Canadian soldiers, killing one, then attacks the cops when they turn up. The cops…blow him away.
Third case: Canada. Muslim attacks unarmed soldier at memorial, kills him, barges into Parliament toting gun; Sergeant at Arms takes aim, cool and calm , fires, and takes him right out – bang! stone dead. Taking no chances.
And now the *fourth* case – New York City, USA. Muslim attacks young cop; the other two cops respond; result, one dead Mohammedan.
Let’s put it this way, the cops in three of those cases and the former Mountie in the Parliament of Canada have saved their respective countries a great deal of trouble and expense, by eliminating the manifest and immediate threat entirely, rather than merely ‘wounding’ him so that he has to be expensively treated and even more expensively tried and then even *more* expensively sentenced to years of prison dawah within which he may recruit the psychically marginal to join the Allah Gang and possibly become even more dangerous than himself.
Good on those two cops in New York City who defended their wounded fellow cops and themselves and their fellow citizens and got rid of a Mohammedan who was running amok with an axe.
PS It’s tragic that a bystander was hurt in the crossfire but…perhaps all Infidels in the West these days need to face the fact that they may find themselves witnessing a situation like this. And if so: the sensible thing to do, if you hear gunfire and see cops engaging a wild-eyed Mohammedan or mohammedans, whether bearded thug or sinister female Gang Moll in the slave rag…HIT THE DECK.
Because here’s the other thing to think about (and the conscious or subconscious recogniton of this possibility may be one reason why the law enforcement in each of these four cases aimed to kill, *fast*) is that in addition to having a gun, or axe, or knife, a mohammedan engaging in an attack may be **loaded to explode**. In which case, killing him or her before they can hit the switch is a really good idea.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
Dumble: I hadn’t put that together. But you sure did!
And following up on your excellent points: There hasn’t been word-one about ‘investigating’ these shootings. Now there are routine investigations anytime there’s weapon discharge. But I’m talking the idiotic, stupid ‘calls for investigation’ which happen in other cases.
And that may, too, be a barometer along the lines of what you were saying, yes? Because as vile as many of our ‘political leaders’ are-DeBlasio topping the list-they feel the mood of the people. ‘Cause if ANYBODY was going to ‘call for’ such idiocy? It’d be commie-card-carrying-best-pal-of-Hitlery-lesbian-marrying, BILL.
Islofob IS-1 says
“Kathy Brown, Esq. ”
LOL!
Don’t hold back, now !
Salah says
Excellent points, dumbledoresarmy. But I would like to take it one step further. EVERY honest citizen should be allowed to carry a concealed handgun for self-defense. Cops cannot protect everybody all the time. We need to be able to protect ourselves.
Jihadists don’t fear the cops, they know they’ll always get to the scene a little too late. Jihadists fear armed citizens.
A pro gun control politician is actually a jihad enabler, whether he knows it or not.
Self defense is a God given right, it’s also a duty.
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.ca/2013/07/ann-barnhardt-jesus-guns.html
eduardo odraude says
Dumbledoresarmy, I don’t disagree with you except for one thing. I don’t know about police elsewhere, but I don’t think there was anything different or new about what these NY police did, or anything to do with Muslims or Islam. If someone is attacking with a deadly weapon, US police are not required to try to just wound that person. They are not required to fire at his legs or his arms, nor are they required to fire one bullet at him and then wait to see if he keeps coming. I believe they can fire fast and repeatedly until he falls down. If he’s got a gun, they can keep firing even after he’s down.
profitsbeard says
Ar t least these cops and the Sergeant-At-Arms in Ottawa have finally gotten the message: ~don’t shoot to wound, but to kill.
No need to try these maniacs and waste millions on the coffer-draining legalistic angle of The Jihad, -just blow them away and then bury them.
In a pigskin coffin, preferably.
gungadin says
LOVE that IDEA….pig skinned coffin !!! Can I send along some bacon to toss in?
Anonamustafa says
HASSAAAAN….CHOP!!!!