“According to a U.S. counterterrorism source, Zehaf-Bibeau was connected to Hasibullah Yusufzai through social media. Yusufzai is wanted by Canadian authorities for traveling overseas to fight alongside Islamist fighters in Syria, The Globe and Mail, a Canadian newspaper, reported.”
“Sources: Ottawa shooting suspect had ties to jihadists,” by Jason Hanna, CNN, October 23, 2014:
(CNN) — The suspect in Wednesday’s shootings in Ottawa had “connections” to jihadists in Canada who shared a radical Islamist ideology, including at least one who went overseas to fight in Syria, multiple U.S. sources told CNN on Thursday.
However, Canadian Foreign Minister John Baird told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour that there is “no evidence at this stage” that Michael Zehaf-Bibeau was linked to a wider group, or network, of jihadists.
“There’s no evidence at this stage for us to know that. Obviously there’s an investigation going on, and we hope to learn more in the … coming days. It was clear that, police authorities now have announced, that he was acting alone yesterday,” he said.
According to a U.S. counterterrorism source, Zehaf-Bibeau was connected to Hasibullah Yusufzai through social media. Yusufzai is wanted by Canadian authorities for traveling overseas to fight alongside Islamist fighters in Syria, The Globe and Mail, a Canadian newspaper, reported.
American officials are reportedly scouring databases and communications for possible links to American-based jihadists.
Other radicalized people connected to Zehaf-Bibeau are still believed to be living in Canada, two U.S. law enforcement officials said….
Jaladhi says
His biggest connection is to Quran – the jihad hate manual!!
sidney penny says
What! only hate ?
What, too much hate in the Koran? only hate you say ?
What about the other things like inciting violence, insulting other religions, promoting religious enmity, disturbing public tranquility, promoting on ground of religion feelings of enmity- see below
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/tcqp/
The real issue raised by the Petition was not what Muslims believe about the Quran but what behaviour patterns the Quran inculcates in its votaries vis-à-vis the unbelievers.
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/tcqp/pref1.htm
Yes the words are “behaviour patterns”
exsgtbrown says
jihadis never act “alone”, there’s always other Islamic connections…you just have to dig deep to find them….
Neil Jennison says
I do find this incredible. The fact the Canadian authorities are “looking for the reason”.
Surely it is blindingly obvious? The man was a Muslim who has presumably read the Qur’an and decided to act upon it as he believes Allah wishes him to. He knew he would die in the process but didn’t care because he believed that he would get his reward.
What else is there to understand?
voegelinian says
The logic is that any explanation for Zehaf-Bibeau’s motivation has to protect the vast majority of Muslims deemed to be innocent and harmless. If any explanation is put forth — or even entertained — that could conceivably have the effect of drawing that vast majority of Muslims deemed to be innocent and harmless into a broad brush of suspicion, that explanation has to be rejected, and a new one found that will avoid such a tendency. What is ironic here is that Neil Jennison’s worldview is more or less the same as the one that has the concern to protect the vast majority of Muslims deemed to be innocent and harmless. As a PC MC who is beginning to wake up to the horror & catastrophe that is Islam, Neil Jennison is currently undergoing the long torturous process of asymptotically extricating himself from the cat’s cradle caused by his PC MC reflexes in tension with his reasonable concern to protect his society from the protracted and alarmingly metastasizing dangers posed by Muslims following their Islam (and what Muslims are not following their Islam, violently, or deceptively through stealth jihad and false assimilation?).
Neil Jennison says
Vogey,
I am beginning to think you have some aspects of austism.
You haven’t a fucking clue what my world view is. You don’t know me.
You just come on these pages to abuse me and others I might add, who you
What’s worse, is that you cannot see the glaring inconsistency in your own position.
Bezelel says
Voeg, After watching a rerun of Matrix I have been trying to compose a brief essay illustrating the comparisons of the population inside the Matrix that could turn into agents as needed. Work keep getting in the way but there is food for thought. Perhaps you can take it to the next level.
Wellington says
Huh, voegelinian, if one just simply reads Neil Jennison’s 4:39 P.M. post above, I don’t see how it’s possible to extrapolate from it to the conclusions you do in your 4:50 P.M. post.
Let me put is another way. Were the Western elites en masse to understand things as Jennison did in his 4:39 P.M. post, we in the West, in Canada, America, Britain, The Netherlands, etc., would be far ahead of where we are now.
You know, you tend to complicate matters that don’t require complication. You also don’t understand that mass deportation of Muslims from a Western country is not necessary to effectively deal with Islam. What is necessary is that Islam in one Western nation after another be looked upon for the vicious anti-Western ideology that it is. After that, other things will start to fall into place, such as prosecuting each and every Muslim who acts upon his warped belief when it violates the law of any Western nation. And ancillary measures such as severely limiting Muslim immigration to Western nations and deporting Muslims and stripping then of Western citizenship when they tend to go into extra fervent (and annoying and dangerous) “Muslim mode” would be helpful too.
The BIG STEP is not deportation. The BIG STEP is seeing Islam as inimical to Western basic values and institutions as much as, say, Nazism and Marxism are. After that, the rest will take care of itself.
voegelinian says
One would have to read the dozen plus other posts Neil Jennison wrote in the past, where he dug in to defend his position (and/or to try to squirm out of it) reminiscent of the previous commenter “whatmecare”.
Neil jennison says
Wellington,
I don’t know what it is about Vogey. He seems more interested in his own “purity of opposition to Islam” and his own pet theories about PC multiculturalism than he is in the actual problem that the religion of Islam presents.
He seems to think that any acceptance that there are “Muslims” who may well just be nominal “Muslims” who wish us no harm because they are decent people who don’t take their nominal religion seriously, means that you are a fully paid member of the leftist PC brigade…..to coin a phrase, not a true “arian” Muslim hater.
In my case this stems from a comment I made some months ago about a chap called Paul who owned a curry house who was a decent enough bloke as far as I could tell. The fact I conceded I couldn’t know whether he harboured Jihadi tendencies meant nothing to Vogey…..I have been labelled by him…….there is no way back.
I assure you, I am fully aware that mainstream Islam teaches Jihad, that all the governments in the west are either in denial about this or are being deceitful about it, or both.
I am fully in agreement with everything Robert Spencer has said (at least everything I have seen or read).
But that isn’t enough for Vogey, that makes me an enemy……….I am not quite purist enough for him. The fact I concede there are nominal Muslims out there who shouldn’t be deported or harassed makes me the enemy in his eyes.
He would lead a very small army into battle, but at least he would die thinking he was right…………you should check out the drivel on his website…………a real eye opener.
Neil Jennison says
I would add, that even presuming Vogey’s stance was correct, that his attitude of abusing those who agree with most of what he says about Islam, would be utterly counter-productive.
Surely from his viewpoint (and indeed from mine) we need to build a consensus of people who see Islam for what it is? Whereas Vogey is only interested in his pet theories and his own ego.
He assured all his readers (both of them) shortly after our first encounters, that Neil Jennison was not my real name, and gave some bullshit explanation about film credits for his opinion ( it is my real name) and that I would soon leave these pages.
Wrong on both counts!
voegelinian says
For readers who want to know why I’m picking on Neil Jennison, the following JW comments thread from early September (112 comments) would be illuminating:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/09/state-dept-vid-tries-to-dissuade-muslims-from-joining-islamic-state-by-arguing-its-un-islamic#comments
Of course, unless the reader has all the time in the world, he should zero in on “jennison” and “voeg” to follow the many exchanges.
Many subtle points were unraveled by me (and raveled and re-raveled by Jennison) which I think tend to support my main (and only) point in this thread here — namely, that Jennison has asymptotic reflexes which (by definition) stem from residual PC MC in his heart & mind (and it does no good necessarily for him to protest that he’s not PC MC — e.g., “Honestly you have lost me completely. You are the ONLY person in history to call me PC. It is my abiding hatred – it has damaged Britain immeasurably.” — for, a) the asymptotic always thinks he’s not PC MC, that indeed is part of the asymptotic neurosis; and b) he has to demonstrate he is free of PC MC and explain his asymptotic lapses, twitches and tics, not just assert it).
Speaking of asymptotic lapses, twitches and tics, I will only note one from that long thread, pertinent to my comment on this thread here — the anecdotal evidence he saw fit to adduce about “Paul”, a nice friendly Muslim he knows “who ran the curry house on Spittal Hill in Sheffield”:
“I have met “Muslims” who are Muslims in name only. Nice people, (who cooked great curries i might add – fantastic Shami Kebabs!)”
As I wrote at the time:
…it’s a common ejaculation one hears from PC MCs (and not a few asymptotics as well) — as though their personal anecdotal evidence has any shred of relevance to a macro problem of geopolitical proportions. Rephrasing it helps to bring out its essentially preposterous logic:
“I know a few Muslims who smile at me and seem friendly and wear blue jeans, therefore we don’t need to be alarmed at the mountain of evidence (including taqiyya) indicating that a general suspicion of Muslims is rationally warranted if we want to protect our societies from terrorism and other dangers radiating out from Islam.”
More precisely for this thread here, I pinpointed the nodus that explains what baffled Jennison about the mainstream — why they can’t seem to name & blame the source of the problem, Islam:
The reason they routinely (almost perversely) avoid the Camel in the Room, I maintained, is:
“to protect the vast majority of Muslims deemed to be innocent and harmless. If any explanation is put forth — or even entertained — that could conceivably have the effect of drawing that vast majority of Muslims deemed to be innocent and harmless into a broad brush of suspicion, that explanation has to be rejected, and a new one found that will avoid such a tendency.”
I went on then to say that it “is ironic … that Neil Jennison’s worldview is more or less the same as the one that has the concern to protect the vast majority of Muslims deemed to be innocent and harmless.”
It would do no good and be either irrelevant or disingenuous for him or his defenders to try to point out that they don’t think the “vast majority” of Muslims are innocent and harmless. It’s not the numbers that matter, it’s the idea that there exists a viably putative and useful demographic of Muslims at all who are innocent (of their Islam) and harmless — a demographic we can know with a certainty sufficient for our #1 priority, the safety of our societies. As I have noted before (possibly in that long thread), it seems Jennison has another priority higher than the safety of our societies — namely, something more or less along the lines of the Casey Dictum (“as horrible as this tragedy was, it would be worse if we sacrificed diversity”), where if he differs about the details (how he defines “diversity” or the fact that he has politically INcorrect bona fides about the notion of multiculturalism, etc.), that difference is on one level less important than the underlying similarity.
Neil Jennison says
Vogey, you need to get a life and visit the real world sometime.
That tosh just says it all.
What can I add ? So what?
I have asymptotic PC MC tendencies apparently…… Vogey has decreed it therefore we all must accept it.
Well, actually Vogey is utterly wrong (something I suspect that in his more lucid moments he is quite used to).
There are people out there who identify as Muslims who wish the west no harm. That is a fact. I therefore cannot agree with his rather totalitarian ideas of deporting all Muslims, even those who are aboriginal. [Quite where he wants to deport those to, I don’t recall him saying].
I accept fully that Islam is an evil ideology that, if followed devoutly, is anti-freedom and anti-western. Though Vogey is hardly innocent of that charge himself….freedom of belief doesn’t seem to be high on his list of things to safeguarded.
So therefore I, a humble British Roman Catholic tend to a limit ( PC MC I think) as some vector ( to be honest, from his website this vector is merely defined as “the lower one” and I couldn’t make head nor tail of what the fuck he was on about) tends to something or other. It is decreed by Vogey. It is so.
Champ says
voeg,
This is what Neil Jennison originally wrote (above) on this thread:
Neil Jennison
October 23, 2014 at 4:39 pm
I do find this incredible. The fact the Canadian authorities are “looking for the reason”.
Surely it is blindingly obvious? The man was a Muslim who has presumably read the Qur’an and decided to act upon it as he believes Allah wishes him to. He knew he would die in the process but didn’t care because he believed that he would get his reward.
What else is there to understand?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I see *nothing* from his above comment which warrants you “picking on” him here and then dredging up an exchange from September–jeez, that was almost two months ago!
Hey, what’s with all the friendly fire?! And I can certainly see why Neil considers your unwarranted attacks, here, abusive. They are. Oh, and now he’s “whatmecare”? Huh? No, he certainly is not!
Please, knock off the friendly fire! Oh, but I’m talking to a wall, I forgot …
voegelinian says
Neil Jennison wrote:
“There are people out there who identify as Muslims who wish the west no harm. That is a fact.
A wish assumed to be in someone else’s head is not a “fact” — unless you can prove scientifically that you are able to mind-read. This is the kind of nonsense that leads me to suspect Jennison is asymptotic (i.e., has PC MC reflexes).
Neil Jennison says
Ah Vogey, you say “”“There are people out there who identify as Muslims who wish the west no harm. That is a fact.
A wish assumed to be in someone else’s head is not a “fact” — unless you can prove scientifically that you are able to mind-read. This is the kind of nonsense that leads me to suspect Jennison is asymptotic (i.e., has PC MC reflexes).””
Fair enough, I cannot mind read…..but then neither can you.
I only need to find one person who identifies themselves as Muslim and who wishes no harm to the west to prove my point, whereas you need to show every nominal Muslim has views that follow the Koran literally…..that is are unreformed Muslims.
As a mathematician, I know where I’d put my money.
voegelinian says
Jennison wrote:
“Fair enough, I cannot mind read…..but then neither can you.”
Yes, but given this basic lack of certainty, one has to decide: am I willing to play Muslim Roulette or not? Jennison apparently has little problem playing that deadly game — probably because (to be generous) he has somehow whittled the magnitude of the problem down sufficiently to make himself feel comfortable about pulling the trigger.
Neil Jennison says
Vogey wrote.”” Yes, but given this basic lack of certainty, one has to decide: am I willing to play Muslim Roulette or not? Jennison apparently has little problem playing that deadly game — probably because (to be generous) he has somehow whittled the magnitude of the problem down sufficiently to make himself feel comfortable about pulling the trigger.””
That isn’t the question at all. That is utter crap! The magnitude of the problem is huge….far, far greater than 98 % of Joe Public realise.
It is a position that allows only your interpretation of “throw out every [nominal] Muslim or accept multiculturalism.
That just isn’t reality. It is perfectly reasonable and consistent to have my viewpoint. Yes I agree that Islam is the problem and that wherever Islam is taught and practiced there will be Jihadis…..that is what Islam teaches. No question, Vogey, I agree.
Multiculturalism……even without the cancer that is Islam,,,,,, I am against it…..with Islam it makes the idea even worse. I have never been a multiculturalist.
Immigration only works in small numbers with cultural assimilation. Something Islam is totally against.
But even so, the superiority of Western culture is [in part] the rights it affords its citizens. So your idea of deporting all people who profess to Muslim ( even aboriginal converts…..though where you wish to deport them you have not said…..a pattern in your posts actually….ignoring the awkward bits).
So, I am not prepared to play Muslim Roulette. I would have a far more robust policy against what mosques teach……I would never have Muslims in in the first place….in fact, I have argued that for many years and was abused mercilessly by the left for saying it.
But my desire to be fair to all people comes from my Catholicism …… God loves all his creation including every Muslim and so must I.
That doesn’t mean I agree with either what they believe or what they do. It has fuck all to do with multiculturalism or PC. In fact it predates PC.
voegelinian says
More details on the problem from a 2010 essay I wrote on my blog:
“Types of evidence for the putative existence of harmless Muslims ”
http://hesperado.blogspot.com/2010/11/types-of-evidence-for-putative.html
voegelinian says
From a recent news report:
…there are about 90 people in the country who are suspected of intending to join the extremist fighting abroad or who have returned from such activity overseas. But RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson said Thursday that Zehaf-Bibeau was not among them.
Always over-estimate the danger from Muslims; that’s the most prudent thing to do.
voegelinian says
source: http://news.yahoo.com/canadas-pm-says-shooting-rampage-terrorism-055949023.html
Salah says
Wellington’s reply:
“The BIG STEP is not deportation. The BIG STEP is seeing Islam as inimical to Western basic values and institutions as much as, say, Nazism and Marxism are. After that, the rest will take care of itself.”
While I agree with Wellington, I also agree with you, voegelinian.
You wrote:
“Always over-estimate the danger from Muslims; that’s the most prudent thing to do.”
That’s what I’ve always been saying here on JW: “NEVER trust a Muslim”
It’s not impossible to co-exist with someone you don’t trust.
“Therefore be as shrewd as serpents and as harmless as doves.” Matthew 10:16
voegelinian says
Yeah, but as Lawrence Auster used to remind the Counter-Jihad (from his position in the outer darkness to where he had been consigned as persona non grata), what do you propose to DO about Muslims, once you agree they are to be generally suspect of being a military & paramilitary danger?
Huck Folder says
Connect the (bloodstained) dots:
“Zehaf-Bibeau was born in Quebec as Michael Joseph Hall and raised in Laval, just north of Montreal. A criminal court database shows 13 identified Quebec court records dates back to June 2001 in Montreal.”
“…he received a six-month sentence in 2003 and three years’ probation on a WEAPONS CHARGE, according to the Herald News.”
“His stepfather or adoptive father is a LIBYAN businessman named Bulgasem Zehaf who once owned a local restaurant, Cafe Tripoli.” [Good place to meet and plot jihad.]
“…friend Dave Bathurst … said his friend [perp] knew Hasibullah Yusufzai, a Vancouver-area resident who was charged in July by the RCMP with travelling to Syria with the intent of joining a deadly terrorist group.” [Not quite ‘lone’?]
“At the Burnaby mosque,* Mr. Bathurst said his friend’s “erratic” behaviour – he did not elaborate – caused frictions with the elders at the ‘house of worship’, [barracks] who asked him to stop attending prayers.” [Was CSIS informed of any of that?]
“His father’s history offers a hint of what Mr. Bathurst was concerned about. In 2011, a Montrealer named “Belgasem Zahef” was quoted in a Washington Times dispatch from the front in Libya, where he had travelled to join the rebel fight.” [Ah, jihadadi!]
* Masjid al-Salaam mosque. They previously hosted notorious antisemites Mohamed Elmasry [“kill all 18 year old Israelis”], Greg Felton [“all Jews are Khazars”], Khurrum Awan [Elmasry’s lawfare sock-puppet] and Derrick O’Keefe [sinislam leftard loser].
http://gregfelton.com/interviews/2008_08_29_Miracle.pdf
“UNDERSTANDING AND DEALING WITH ISLAMOPHOBIA
Canadian Islamic Congress organizes successful conference at Masjid Al-Salam”
“Members of community packed the room to listen and participate in a discussion on Islamophobia on August 22nd, 2008 . The event was organized by Canadian Islamic Congress (CIC) and conducted by M. Yasin. Several political dignitaries [?] and key members of the Muslim community [?] were also in attendance. Dr. Naiyer Habib, a director of CIC Congress opened the conference with his remark that Islamophobia, unjustified [!] fear of Muslims and Islam, is rampant across the western world and is on the rise. Its impact is not only on Muslims but also on the entire western world.”
They omit the quote by Elmasry about “sheep-shaggers” in front of an audience of all ages including small children. Some of the teens seemed to go a little cross-eyed at that statement.
Currently, they are hosting an imam too hot for Canada’s government, Dr. Zijad Delić:
“The Burnaby [?] will be celebrating ‘Islamic History Month’ [What on earth for?] by having a lecture on Saturday, October 25th 2014. The key note speakers are below:
Dr. Imam Zijad Delic will speak on “Canadian Muslim – The History, Present and Future”
Dr. Redouane Al Fakir# will speak on “Rise of the Modern Scientific Mind” [!]
# Almost two years ago, Al Fakir created the UBC-based “Muhammad Institute for Space Science”. [How can that be? The mo world is flat!]
http://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/the-case-of-imam-zijad-delic/
Wtf? says
There is a very simple mechanism to penalise supporters of these jihadists. When the government plucks up the courage. As soon as a jihadist has committed or intended to commit a crime their mosque is shut down and boarded up. When all doubt is removed the mosque is destroyed and all members of the mosque slapped with a very large fine. The fine may well be paid by the Saudis but at least the west gets some of its oil money back. I have been saying this for so long but the Imans and mosques need to be licensed and monitored, this is where all the trouble starts. Round up the Imans and start brainwashing them or better still deport them.
Additionally if anyone changes their name officially to raghead description flag them and bring them in!
joeactionhero says
You’ve referenced Al-Fakirs Muhammad Institute… I’ve been tracking that operation for years and have a pile of info. Charitable status ‘voluntarily revoked’ in 2012. But his mission continues, lately stripped of the ‘restoring the arabic golden age’ fluff, and as of two weeks ago, even any mention of islam at all!
got files/can schmooze
Wellington says
I say this to the current crop of Western elites in politics, the media and academia: You are making excuses for evil. The evil is Islam. Shame on you all for all time. You make me sick. I have nothing but contempt for you. Blood is on your hands as much as it is on those of countless Muslims who follow a religion which is sick to its very core.
After all, making excuses for evil, obfuscating evil, is essentially as bad as evil itself. In fact, arguably even worse. Go to hell, you Western elites, who continue to cover for a most invidious malevolence.
dumbledoresarmy says
He had connections to jihadists.
Of course he did!
He became a Muslim.
He chose to follow the Islam of his stepfather or adoptive father, the Muslim that his birth mother had, foolishly, married.
Born in Canada, to non-Muslim parents, this man *could* have chosen to become a Catholic or Protestant Christian, or a Buddhist, or a Hare Krishna, or an atheist or an agnostic. Lots of choices. But instead – influenced by that Libyan Muslim stepfather/ adoptive father?? – he chose…Islam. And he attended a mosque.
And that’s the association with jihadists, right there.
That’s the one necessary and sufficient condition.
Those who are raised within Islam, or who voluntarily join the Allah Gang, tend to Go Jihad with monotonous regularity.
They just do it in different ways – some by joining and acting in concert with and under the orders of a recognised and named subfranchise of the Mohammedan Mob, such as Al Qaeda, or the Ikhwan, or, lately, the Islamic State, and some by striking on their own, as opportunity presents. It’s all Jihad and it’s all consistent with the foundational blueprint.
By analogy: in Christianity, one may obey the instructions to spread the gospel and to perform acts of charity by joining an official Order or organisation devoted to evangelism and/ or acts of charity; or one may do so on one’s own in a “freelance” sort of way. But the pioneer evangelist who heads out into the wilds “without a parachute” – one thinks, for example, of Gladys Aylward in China – and the doer of good works who isn’t part of a registered charity, are still quite obviously part of the Church and what they do is congruent with the foundational blueprint.
R Cole says
Good Mark Steyn
Mark Steyn’s take on the Ottawa Canada Parliament attack
Video
Mark Steyn makes some good points – as a result of the attack there is talk of the need to tighten up security – and on the other there – is the fact that we are letting them change our society – from a free one to an Islamic one – effectively.
There was a CNN documentary on Saudi Arabia some years ago – before PC – that showed how that society went from being more liberal -to the ultra conservative one that it is today. Girls were after placed in separate classrooms. Went from dressing in typical western school uniforms -w/sunglasses – to the burqa/all black. But they also showed footage of one of the main palaces – and at the entrance – to create a barrier there were at least two tanks!
It must be that along with the radicalism – comes the sense of insecurity.
The lack of tolerance for the variations in Islamic practice – to lack of tolerance for a diverse Canadian society.
And as Mark Steyn points out – our cultural turrets-like response doesn’t help – calling out Islamophobia – every time someone is guided by Islam to carry out a terrorist attack – means that Islam is turned into the victim and the real issue behind the need for more security – the ideology – is ignored.
Case in point – instead of yoga on the front law of Canada’s Parliament – we will park some tanks. That’ll do it!!
Excellent piece.
Wilders appears briefly – saying – why trap these jihadist types in our countries. The US has been doing this for years – the US citizen finds themselves in the outback of Yemen – and other places that ‘teach’ Arabic – but when they try to come back – find themselves – mired in places like Turkey, South America, wherever – but they are not catching any plane to the US .
The latest news is that – although delayed – the Canada Parliament shooter may have gotten his passport – but the jihadist attacker earlier this week was definitely denied a passport. And he ran over two officers – killing one.
Was it better to let him go – that is the question?
Rob says
Mark said ‘Tourettes Syndrome’.
It’s a medical condition where sufferers involuntarily bark out obscenities or inappropriate remarks.
gravenimage says
Ottawa shooter had “connections” to jihadists
……………………….
Who here is surprised by this? With his Jihadist father, his years’-long Mosque attendance, and his “connections” to other Jihadists, homicidal Jihad terrorist Michael Zehaf-Bibeau has proven to be a wolf, all right—but not really such a lone one…
gfmucci says
This brings to mind a recent trip to Canada by bus with my daughter. We all got off the bus at the border to have our passports checked by Canadian border patrol. A young Iranian remained on the bus claiming his passport slipped into a crevice behind the windshield of the bus. It couldn’t be seen or retrieved. After a brief search and conversation with Canadian officials, he was allowed to enter Canada without his passport. I don’t know how common this sort of occurrence is. But it seemed odd to me at the time.
TNT says
Sadly the RCMP would rather their killing monsters, over the Canadian people . And if our hero soldier full of valour, standing on guard at the war memorial had a gun that was loaded he would still be alive today. How much blood will have to be spilt on either side of the boarder before this comes to a screeching hault. Canadians won’t take this, people are very angry! And the question of gun laws and controls, isn’t even a question. It won’t matter about policies, the one objective will be to protect our country and everything we hold very dear in our hearts, just like our gallant war heroes held in their hearts. All those years ago! To allow them to die in vain and to allow political fascism destroy our freedom is not acceptable. We don’t have a large army, but that doesn’t mean one can’t be built overnight! You get Canadians reserve thundering loud enough, they who are our official enemy, will know what the Great white Cow as they call us is all about. That’s two strikes against us, two Canadian soldiers. hearts are pounding not with fear, but with eagerness to destroy those who wish to destroy us. People in Canada as well as the US are still waking up, yesterday morning was quite the ringing of the alarm clock. I pray it rang loud enough!
TNT says
And one more thing, that Rosie Donald chick with her own foolish tv gossip show, how dare she use the attack on our country to promote her anti cowboy campaign. How dare she insult us like that. Exploiting our anguish to be use as a opportunity in such a way, bleeding heart liberal! Poppy cock! If our soldier had a loaded gun it’s a very good chance he’d be alive today. And if I was near that vile tasteless woman I’d shove a bar of soap in that mouth.
matthew barnett says
according to the daily mail the madness and the muslim are seperate in his case
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2805871/I-want-jail-overcome-crack-addiction-2011-psych-assessment-Canadian-gunman-throws-doubt-terror-theory-revealed-no-evidence-jihadist-links.html
Bronson says
They have no shame do they. I’m referring to the Muslims who turned up at the War Memorial to place flowers where Corporal Nathan Cirillo was killed. And the imam who told everyone that Islam means Peace, the imam revering Mohammed whose perfect example the jihadist was merely emulating as do the IS jihadists They have to contaminate everything.
IndianTiger says
Canada has bent over backwards, as far as I know from this distance, to welcome and accommodate muslims. Now they pay the price. Stop muslims immigration!