Britain continues its descent into madness. My latest in FrontPage:
The UK’s Guardian reported Wednesday that “sexual exploitation of vulnerable children has become the social norm in some parts of Greater Manchester,” and the denial and obfuscation about what is really causing this problem is thicker than ever.
In the very same sentence in which it broke this terrible news, the Guardian stated that this phenomenon is “fuelled by explicit music videos and quasi-pornographic selfies, an MP has warned.” The MP in question, former social worker Ann Coffey, has issued a report on the sexual exploitation of children in Britain that she said would “make painful reading for those who hoped that Rochdale was an isolated case.”
It was in Rochdale that a group of Muslims were involved in a large-scale sex trafficking ring involving young non-Muslim girls. Coffey is right: there is already abundant evidence that it was not an isolated case, as 1,400 British non-Muslim children were gang-raped and brutalized by Muslims in the British city of Rotherham alone, and there are numerous other documented cases in Britain of Muslim sex trafficking and rape gangs, of which the victims were non-Muslim girls.
Why has this been happening, and on such a massive scale? According to the Guardian, it’s all because social workers and others in positions of authority just don’t like troubled young people: “Coffey said police, social workers, prosecutors and juries are often inherently (albeit unconsciously) prejudiced against vulnerable teenagers – perhaps explaining why, out of 13,000 reported cases of major sexual offences against under-16s in the past six years in Greater Manchester, there have been only 1,000 convictions.”
Social workers, prosecutors, and juries are inherently prejudiced against vulnerable teenagers? With that, Coffey could win the prize for the most preposterous evasion offered this year to try to exonerate Islamic doctrine from responsibility for the evils done by those who act upon that doctrine – although she will, as in every year, face stiff competition.
In reality, social workers are not prejudiced against vulnerable teenagers; they’ve dedicated their lives to aiding people such as vulnerable teenagers. No, what social workers, in the U.S. as well as in Britain, are prejudiced against is being called “racist.” In Rotherham, British officials “described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”
And what were the ethnic origins of those perpetrators? Wednesday’s Guardian report doesn’t mention it (which in itself is telling), but 75%, and probably more (since it is so politically unacceptable to report such things) of these rape and sexual exploitation gangs are “Asian,” which is British Newspeak for “Muslim.” Despite the continuing horror of these revelations, the British continue to take all this with equanimity, for to resist it would be “racist” and “Islamophobic.”
If Ann Coffey and others who are horrified at these rape gangs and the exploitation of children really want to stop this practice, sooner or later they are going to have to stop kidding themselves and their supporters, and confront the politically correct elites who hurl such charges at anyone who ventures any criticism of Islam and Muslims. For the unpleasant truth is that these rape gangs have become “the norm” in all too many cities in Britain because Muslims are taking seriously material from the Qur’an and Sunnah that justifies those practices.
According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general, as does this passage. “Certainly will the believers have succeeded: They who are during their prayer humbly submissive, and they who turn away from ill speech, and they who are observant of zakah, and they who guard their private parts except from their wives or those their right hands possess, for indeed, they will not be blamed” (Qur’an 23:1-6).
The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Muslim 3371)
The twentieth-century Qur’an commentator Maulana Bulandshahri explains the wisdom of this practice, and longs for the good old days when Muslims took sex slaves (days that appear now to have returned):
During Jihad (religion war), many men and women become war captives. The Amirul Mu’minin [leader of the believers, or caliph — an office now vacant] has the choice of distributing them amongst the Mujahidin [warriors of jihad], in which event they will become the property of these Mujahidin. This enslavement is the penalty for disbelief (kufr).
He goes on to explain that this is not ancient history:
None of the injunctions pertaining to slavery have been abrogated in the Shari’ah. The reason that the Muslims of today do not have slaves is because they do not engage in Jihad (religion war). Their wars are fought by the instruction of the disbelievers (kuffar) and are halted by the same felons. The Muslim [sic] have been shackled by such treaties of the disbelievers (kuffar) whereby they cannot enslave anyone in the event of a war. Muslims have been denied a great boon whereby every home could have had a slave. May Allah grant the Muslims the ability to escape the tentacles of the enemy, remain steadfast upon the Din (religion) and engage in Jihad (religion war) according to the injunctions of Shari’ah. Amen!
This is by no means an eccentric or unorthodox view in Islam. The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that as they waged jihad warfare against infidels, Muslims would take slaves. He clarified what he meant in a subsequent interview:
…Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars–there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.
When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Qur’an 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point–there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.
Right around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti activist and politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.
…A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up (this man’s) situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”
The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”
“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.
“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not–she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”
While the savage exploitation of girls and young women is an unfortunately cross-cultural phenomenon, only in Islamic law does it carry anything approaching divine sanction. Here is yet another human rights scandal occasioned by Islamic law that the international human rights community and the mainstream media cravenly ignore. And even when the devastation that this practice has caused is staring them in the face, British officials tell themselves and the public that it’s all because social workers don’t like teenagers.
As Britain descends into madness, we can only hope its demise will serve as a cautionary tale for other countries in the West.
johnrowe1 says
Off with their heads…..
Don McKellar says
If I lived in Manchester and had a daughter who was raped by these Koranimals, every mosque in the city would be burned to the ground before I was through. There would be no mercy. Then, and only then, would I target the human garbage who did this. How in the world do the parents of these women deal with this societal suicide and not go on a rampage against the moslems who did this, following their religious texts as exactly as they do? What is wrong with them?
citycat says
That echoes the feelings of many.
Shane says
The twin mental diseases of Liberalism and feminism have emasculated European men and have led most non-Muslim Europeans to ignore the rape jihad in their countries. It is time for the conservatives to take over and exterminate these rape gangs.
Alissa says
Fighting back en masse will lead to anarchy because the muslim population will push back because those of us who don’t believe in “moderate muslims” will intimidate them. Everyone shrinks away from the thought of that, but we’ve let this scourge work it’s evil for so long now that anarchy is a certainty…if not now then later. We just need a tipping point and it will happen. And when it does all these whacko liberals will abandon their sanctimonious views and jump on board declaring that they had been misled and now see the light.
JihadWatchJane says
I’m not sure what version of feminism you think is a “mental disease” – it’s a broad church in the same way that conservatism or liberalism can range from the perfectly reasonable to the bonkers – but its core, and the feminism I subscribe to, if any, is simply the belief that men and women are of equal worth (which does not imply men and women are the same, only that they are each equally worthy of respect and recognized for their common human dignity).
I am not sure how you can possibly see this vile Islamically-sanctioned violation of women (which results from a belief system that women are of lower status and worth than men) as somehow the fault of the belief system (feminism) that men and women are of equal worth.
These abhorrent events are an affront to humanity, not the preserve of either men or women. We don’t need these sorts of artificial, politically motivated divisions.
Nabhnil says
So , as long as your daughter is not raped you will do nothing!! If a majority of your countrymen think alike, then I am afraid your nation is doomed!! This comes from a Hindu who has no love lost for either the Muslims or the Brits, but I do know which is the greater EVIL. We have a 1200 years experience of this cult.
mortimer says
Working class white girls are being abandoned to Muslim pedophiles. Mohammed’s favorite sex slave was a Christian woman, Maria. Muslims wish to imitate Mohammed, the perfect role model for Muslims. They also wish to humiliate and demoralize Christians by raping Christian women. This is a rape jihad. There is no conscience in Islam…just don’t do it to a Muslim is the only rule.
Kim says
It wasn’t just white girls. There were and likely still are Sikh & Hindu girls who were also being raped. After all they aren’t Muslims and as such can also be treated in such a disgusting manner.
Do I need to add that this makes the racist usage of the word “Asian” even worse? Not only were no Asian kuffars involved in perpetuating the crimes but asian kuffars are victims.
Shane says
Yes, the European press is insulting Asians by calling these rape gang members “Asians.” These animals are Muslims and most of them are from Pakistan. The Brits have got to deal with their Muslim problem now.
kiorikid says
The Brits have to deal with the Multicultural intellectual fascism
of Political Correctness FIRST!
bernie says
There were probably also at least a few non-Muslim African or Afro-Carribean girls, or non-Muslim girls of Oriental Asian background (such as ethnic Chinese, Vietnamese, etc.) as well.
Ayatrollah says
The idea that Muslims can rape captive women is so atrocious that it is unbelievable until one reads the Islamic texts for one’s self. Even then people can say “there is lots of Islamic law and not everyone agrees”.
After you have studied Islam it becomes “of course they can rape captive women”, with Allah’s blessing. It is such a par of Islam and sharia that it does not even shock me anymore,
Salah says
“The idea that Muslims can rape captive women is so atrocious..”
How about the rape of… captive men?
How many in the MSM know and report about it?
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/04/rape-and-torture-viol-et-torture.html
BC says
What is in need of examination is the role of the parents in this. The majority, if not all of these girls are described as ‘troubled’ which is PC for having a poor familial relationship. This is originally the result in most case,s of poor parenting. These Muslims prey on these girls who are out late at night, smoking and drinking underage and out of the control of their parents. NB. I am not making excuses for those groomers and rapists at all, but there is a family problem behind each of these cases. We know very well that women, let alone young girls, out and about without male supervision are regarded by Muslims as loose women and sluts and thus open to exploitation.
After all they are just kuffars who will go to hell anyway.
Babs says
With respect, that many of the children’s parents are next to useless as parents (in the sense that they seem not to care what their youngsters get up to and would probably do almost anything for a quiet life) can never, ever excuse the animals who use that as an opportunity to make money from them and use them as objects for gratification. I believe we are beginning on a dangerous path if we focus too much on that lack of care from the parents (and indeed are echoing what one accused in the last round of trials argued by way of mitigation) rather than on the animal-like natures of the abusers who see them as business opportunities.
No, this has more to do with the way in which these animals see women and children, and not only kufr women and children, that lies at the root of this, and it in turn is driven by low intelligence and slavish following of Islamic teaching.
dumbledoresarmy says
It’s not just *bad girls* who are running around late at night.
It’s little girls in school uniforms who are on their way *to and from school*…grade school, not high school, in some cases.
Didn’t you read the news story that Mr Spencer put up at this forum, earlier on?
Excerpt:
“During the eight months Coffey spent researching her report, **schoolgirls, some prepubescent, told her that being harassed by older men while in their school uniform was simply “part of everyday life”.** {my emphasis – dda}.
” They also reported online abuse, but said it didn’t bother them.
**“Big men will stop little girls in the road and the street. In person, it’s real.** {my emphasis – dda}.
” But you can block it online,” said one girl.
‘They complained that men regularly tried to touch them or entice them into their cars, but that when police were alerted, officers told the girls: “Do not be causing trouble.” END QUOTE
And that isn’t the first time I’ve read an account of Muslim men in the UK **hanging around the schools** as the kids go in or come out0, *stalking* the girls. ANY girls. *All* the girls. If she’s nine and upwards, infidel, in a school uniform…that’s all it takes. She’s not “out on the town” in a miniskirt with a cigarette…she’s in her school uniform, coming out the front gate of the school, by daylight. *That*’s when some of this harassment and stalking and ogling and groping is happening.
Of course, the parents or other relatives can protect the girls: but only by escorting them every step of the way to and from the school gate, every day. Something that – Before Islam – they did not necessarily have to do.
Almach says
Just before the Roterham case exploded I spoke with an UK educator and social worker (I was living in London until mid August when I then relocated overseas), we were talking about the child sex abuse committed by muslims as she was telling that in the community where she used to work they´d spotted repeated problems of the same kind. I then told her that this was a time bomb, that I felt that much worse was still to happen and she agreed 100% that something very ugly was to surface one day rather sooner than later. A fortnight later, Rotherham was on the headlines. But people are as always afraid to speak up and British people are ALREADY quite repressed, they hide their feelings, it´s really not like in France where they are hot blooded Latins. For me it came to a point, after having seen an ad on a London Bus, more specifically the n. 3 that goes from Oxford Circus to Crystal Palace saying that if you are caught criticising someone´s religion you would be persecuted and could even lose your home, that I felt I would be in danger if I continued to be so outspoken about islam. So that was the last drop in the bucket that made me leave the country.
Richie says
there has to be a point when the people day enough, and stand up and fight for their very survival. What is it going to take? These Muslims are utter savages- there is nothing resembling morality and decency in their religion- they will not stop, until they are stopped. The first common sense approach is deport the Muslim animals that are flooding into Britain, and imprison the ones who are proven pedophiles.
Keith says
The only thing that stopped them in the last 2-300 years was the western countries advanced and were able to stop them the only Islam understands by giving them a bloody nose and repeating it as necessary until Jihad ceased. That is what we are going to have to do again.
Danny says
Thankyou for your amazing & enlightening work Robert Spencer, especially reporting on major issues in greater manchester UK (This is where in the UK i am based) it is exactly how Robert is putting it, there are obviously the sympathizers out there that say this has nothing to do with islam of course.
Truth says
If the Muslims try this in the USA, I’m armed.
Richie says
For how long? Obama and his party WILL work take away your guns. The west seems to have lost its courage to stand up to fascism in any form
Ez Green says
This has nothing to do with music videos and everything to do with culture. Dirty pigs.
Darren says
Parents in the U.K would rather have their children raped than be thought of as being racist or being an islamophobe. There should be millions of people protesting in the street demanding justice, instead there is silence. R.I.P England.
Richie says
It just boggles my mind that the liberal governments in Europe are protecting these child rapists BECAUSE the rapists are Muslims. What utter cowardice. These Muslim rapists need to be round out and exterminated like rats. If I had a daughter raped by a Muslim animal, he would meet his end by my hand. The day may come when the citizens of Europe will have to fight for their very lives and that of their families- since the socialist governments will do nothing- and have handed the keys of power over to Muslims
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
Commentary on a New York Times report on this phenomenon:
http://www.unz.com/isteve/nyt-the-real-danger-in-rotherham-stereotyping/
Jae M says
Thank God for Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller who have the courage to expose what is happening. The sickening depravity of ignoring the crime of rape is a crime itself. Put these sick bastards in jail. Start doing something about the criminal activities of these people before they run out all the decent law abiding citizens.
Brian Ozzy says
England is on the slippery slope to Muslimhood. How sad to see such a wonderfully history rich country wither away from the onslaught of Islam and PC.
The media and the courts and the police all had a field day showing how they will not stand idly by while children are molested when poor old Rolf Harris was hauled before the courts for patting a young girl on the bottom and peering down her front 40 years ago. What pathetic hypocrisy! Still no one could label them racists, bigots or islamaphobic seeing as it was just a good ol’ white boy.
Sadly Australia is in a rapid decline as well, as are most western nations. I’m glad I only have a few years left and can remember the world in saner times.
Bewick says
Northumbria Police have an ongoing investigation called Operation Sanctuary. This is concentrated in the Tyneside and Wearside areas (Newcastle upon Tyne and Sunderland). So far 122 people have been arrested but only 11 or so have yet been charged. Only the names of the 11 charged have been revealed but not their ethnicity. Most seem to be of Pakistani/Bangladeshi and African origin.Predictable. A couple have eastern european names and one has a totally English name. This operation seems not to have yet made national headlines.
At the same time I keep hearing interviews with female muslim activists who claim that “asian” girls are also targetted by these paedophiles. They never say “muslim girls” so make of that what you will. I know what I think. They mean Hindu, Buddhist, and Sikh in particular but not muslim.
I would seriously expect that this grooming of underage girls by members of a particular religion is widespread and in every town and city in the UK. (and likely the whole of Europe). The Muslim head of the Crown Prosecution Service in the North-West of England has recently said as much. He has urged ALL muslims to reveal what they know about the perpetrators and condemn their actions. Good luck with that Mr Nazir Afzal.