“It was a simple comparison and it was factual. Muhammad did marry a 9-year-old girl.”
“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).
“The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became Allright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah”s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah”s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).
Will British authorities seize and destroy copies of the hadith of Bukhari for stating that Aisha was nine was Muhammad consummated his marriage with her? Will those who own or sell it be charged with “religious aggravation”?
Britain is dying, while its authorities do nothing to save it, for fear of being called “racist.” When telling the truth becomes an offense for which someone can be arrested and prosecuted, the society in which this happens in its death throes.
“Street Preacher Charged With ‘Religious Aggravation’ for Comparing Jesus and Muhammad,” Charisma News, October 6, 2014 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
Street evangelist Mike Overd, a client of the Christian Legal Centre, is being prosecuted in the United Kingdom for an alleged religious aggravation public order offense.
The charges follow a complaint to police in Taunton, that Overd made a comparison between the perfect life of Jesus and the life of Islam’s prophet, Muhammad.
Police have informed the former paratrooper that the Crown Prosecution Service wishes to bring three charges against him under Section 5 of the Public Order Act.
A Taunton police sergeant recently gave an interview to BBC television and a newspaper locally, urging residents to film the evangelist’s preaching as it was alleged that Overd’s preaching was “causing offense.”
The officer has also asked local traders to film Overd if they believed he was preaching “offensively.”
Overd insists that when he made a comparison between the perfect life of Jesus and the life led by Muhammad, he did not speak in a hateful way.
“It was a simple comparison and it was factual. Muhammad did marry a 9-year-old girl. I have no hatred of Muslims in me at all and only preach the truth of the gospel. Recently a Muslim man came to my defense when I was preaching and a local shopkeeper started to shout at me.
“The Muslim gentleman didn’t take offense because he said he knew I was simply preaching what I believed and agreed there was no hatred in me. I’ve got this incident on video, and I also have video evidence of the incidents which have led to this forthcoming prosecution.”
Overd has been told his case will come to court before the end of this year.
rev g says
Not much similarity at all. Quite the black and white comparison.
John C. Barile says
What a despicably unjust statute. Just thinly-veiled blasphemy laws. How many conscientious people have been persecuted down through the years by unjust codes designed to protect the Powers That Be?
mariam rove says
They have to do this, otherwise muslims are going to riot. M
John C. Barile says
Yes, that must be why.
Aardvark says
They riot anyway!
John C. Barile says
God save America’s Bill of Rights!
applejack says
‘Britain’ is not dying for want of free speech. Britain is not dying at all. ENGLAND is dying. It is ENGLAND and ENGLAND ALONE they wish to destroy. Scotland’s non-white population – the dilemma is as much racial as it is cultural – is barely half of one per cent according to a London Independent newspaper article of October 2006. Scots are ‘British’ too you know. They just use ‘British’ identity – a federal identity, NOT a synonym for English – when it suits. ‘Britishness’ gives access to the party system and political appointments. From this it is a straightforward matter to direct immigration south of the border disguised as fulfilling EU border directives while protecting Scotland from the influx and settling a few [largely invented] historical scores into the bargain. Use wrong names, E A Freeman observed, and you’re unlikely to have right ideas. This is why we get the same calculated mis-naming [misdirection] and – mostly from naïve, frightened English people sad to say – exhibition of wilful ignorance every time the subject is raised. The truth is simple enough: ‘British’ and ‘Yoo-Kay’ offer a terminological inexactitude loved by politicians precisely because these imply a burden shared more or less equally throughout these island while disguising the fatal damage being inflicted on one part of them. Let’s get our facts right. Let’s get our names right. I’m sorry but England’s enemies are everywhere, and the most dangerous don’t necessarily come sporting beards and waving copies of the Koran.
gravenimage says
This problem is *not* “as much racial as cultural”—the above story has *nothing* to do with race.
And while England is far gone, she is *hardly* the only member of the UK with Jihad and dhimmitude problems, which have also infested Scotland, Wales, and northern Ireland.
And the idea that this is some sort of conspiracy against England also makes little sense, since this problem has been largely self-inflicted.
And I am not picking on England here—far from it. The problem of dhimmitude throughout the West is largely self-inflicted.
Sue says
Idiot Brits.
Yokel says
@ Sue
Hardly conducive to an adult conversation to resolve the situation!
Alternatively, you won’t mind that when things like this start to happen in the Good Ole US of A, we refer to “Idiot Yanks”, will you? After all, you chose Obama all by yourselves, George III didn’t!
Salah says
“Overd made a comparison between the perfect life of Jesus and the life of Islam’s prophet, Muhammad.”
The Qur’an itself, as well as the hadiths, made the same comparison.
And the Qur’an itself, as well as the hadiths, came out with the same conclusions: Jesus was perfect, Muhammad was not!
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2011/05/saint-and-sinner.html
nothosaur says
That is an excellent point, Salah. If he had quoted Koran/Hadith’s comparison, would he be arrested? If an Imam did so, then what? If an apostate Muslim did so, then what? England would likely have a different response for each situation, since they respond according to their own emotional reaction anyway. It’s an absurd law.
Champ says
“David Wood – Jesus or Muhammad – Bible Corruption”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPcRAru9p5U
Awesome video!
terry says
Something is wrong, big time, not only in UK but on this planet right now!
Steven says
I live in the U.K and freedom of speech seems to be a thing of the past. People seem far more repressed nowadays and scared stiff just to express their honest opinions.Fear of what— anything that goes against the prevailing views of any of our so called authorities. In other words very few people will speak the truth to power—its almost becoming like living in a totalitarian state. The general consensus is that Islam is a religion of peace. I feel depressed at times so many people are like unthinking sheep and the only remedy I think is for more people to read the Koran Sira and Hadiths and see what they actually advocate.
PRCS says
“unthinking sheep and the only remedy I think is for more people to read the Koran Sira and Hadiths and see what they actually advocate”
It’s a nice thought, but I’m afraid it won’t happen until another atrocity is committed in your country; on your soil.
The one way to correct the problem there is to vote the bums out and people in who will represent you and your nation’s values–before those values become Muslim values.
We have the same problem here, in the U.S.
People are apathetic and too many of us still buy into the notion that jihadists are “perverting” and “hijacking” the “Religion of Peace”.
Beagle says
Non-Muslims will soon have to congregate in sharia-exclusion zones and defend themselves from both Muslims individually and national governments acting as sharia courts and religious police. Real life is starting to become the Robert Ferrigno Assassin series of novels.
Abe says
A friend of mine studying in Australia once told me how the chaps there like to look down on their British counterparts and call them by I think a derogatory, colloquial term. I’m beginning to see why…
While the UK submits to the multicultural rule so willingly, the Australians try to at least retain a sense of themselves through intelligent rules/laws like banning mosques over there the right to blare the call to prayer openly by invoking a noise pollution clause.
How the mighty have fallen. I cry for the beloved country…
Bezelel says
Since ,Religious Aggravation is a crime, how can islam survive in the UK?
Ernie says
Because people are willingly ignorant
Peter Buckley says
This is a clever move on this guy’s part. Jesus/Muhammad comparisons are readily available on the Internet already:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RxNv8W-Jes
Nobody’s mentioned. If this guy gets convicted, he knows that “the evidence” will be publicized. At this moment, Islam has nothing to gain, but everything to lose. Will the authorities come after David Wood and Sam Shamoun?
There is a large percentage of muslims who are unaware of some of Muhammad’s actions and sayings……….
Jesus says
Alright! Finally someone who speaks the TRUTH, and really read the Koran. Muslims are just a bunch of uneducated sandal wearing sheep groping ignorant peasants!!!! Who by the way memorize what they are told are the important passages of their bible (Koran) 80% are illiterate can’t read and the other 20% don’t take the time read the Koran. If people only did read it world wide cover to cover they would realize the truth. Mohamed stole all the nice ideas in the Koran from our Bible and the rest of the obviously man made self serving ideas in the Koran he made up as he went along, raping, murdering, stealing robbing and enslaving anyone who opposed or exposed him. And all his followers were the same, they came from theives, murders rapist who were opportunistic and realize Mohamed was a dream, because he brought religious (Islam) justification to their Corrupt actions. Read the KORAN cover to cover, all he did Was rewrite “the Old Testament” in poetic rhymes and claimed to be a prophet, and when he was exposed as a false fake, conman! He began to write about his hatred towards Jews and Christians and infact that is how he survived, by rasping, enslaving, then killing and stealing all the wealth, food and lands from them. He never created or built anything but the largest army of thiefs, rapist, pedophiles, murders to run in the desert and steal everything from the Good, peacefull hardworking farmers, merchants and villages. He was a thug who successfully united all the worse of the worse and had him following him like hippnotized idiots committing every atrocity with anointnent and blessing from his made up religion. Wake up world!!! And now the operas that Be are using these stupid idiots to do what they do best, to ruin and invade and take over what good Christians and Jews have built and claim it for themselves!!! If it wasn’t for oil, what would they be contributing to the world. Sheep herding in the desert and pedophilia!!!
kanthan says
I agree dear Brother what you mention about these idiots , according to their Koran everything mentioned is stupid ideas to our civil society , I m Hindu but I cannot accept anything from their religious ideas ….. anyway lots of other religious people go behind their ideas and now its a big threat to the whole world …… thanks
R Cole says
It sounds like the cop is a little bit Dukes of Hazzards.
Better than a taser – you can hit the persistent street preacher with a ‘religious aggravation’ assault charge — for preaching ‘offensively’ on Islam.
Not helpful when Muslims are not even offended!!
Just the job for Sheriff Rosco P Coltrane!
Charli Main says
But of course, there is no problem with vermin like Amjam Choudray preaching hate and murder on British streets.
There is no problem with Muslims rampaging down the streets waving banners with Sharia4 Britain on them or behead those that insult the ” prophet”.
Jayell says
“Britain is dying, while its authorities do nothing to save it, for fear of being called “racist.” When telling the truth becomes an offense for which someone can be arrested and prosecuted, the society in which this happens in its death throes.” Perhaps we shouldn’t be too pessimistic just yet. This kind of nonsense has been going on for years. Some years ago the then chairman of the British National Party, Nick Griffin, was hauled before a court for saying that “Islam is a vicious and wicked ideology” after the revelation of muslim paedophile sex gangs in Keighley, Yorkshire. The jury were having none of it, Mr Griffin was exonerated, and the authorities were effectively told where they get off. However, earlier this year a man was dragged before a court for publicly quoting Winston Churchill’s not-too complimentary opinions of Islam, despite the fact these have been available in print in the public domain for decades. I believe the man may have been fined or something, but then a national newspaper printed exactly the same quote a few days later and nothing happened. It would appear the CPS (Prosecution Service) were happy to hound a private citizen but, strangely, not the national press. Since 2010 there have been a series of what can only reasonably be called ‘transparently and cynically orchestrated witch hunts’ against well-known and established (white)male celebrity figures, consisting of prosecutions for sexual offences that were purported to have occurred 20 – 30 years previously. A lot of these alleged ‘offences’ were little more than ‘groping’ incidents (no rape or the like)and the only ‘evidence’ was complaints from alleged ‘victims’. The vast majority of these allegations were thrown out of court, but only after a lot of front-page publicity whilst, strangely at the same time many truly horrendous cases concerning vicious muslim paedophile rape gangs were also coming to court. The latter were hardly reported and were oddly overshadowed by the ‘celebrity’ cases. Now, also strangely, a lot of people have been beginning to smell a rat. I wonder why?
ECAW says
Not quite accurate. Paul Weston of Liberty GB was arrested for quoting the Churchill passage. He was released after several hours detention. It’s a pity it never came to court because it would have given publicity to the issue as did the court case against Tim Burton for calling Fiyaz Mughal of TellMama a “mendacious, grievance mongering taqiyya artist” (he was acquitted).
This Overd case sounds shocking on the face of it. I hope there are protesters outside the court when we find out whether telling the truth is a defence under these accursed hate speech laws.
Semeru says
Not quite right either. Weston was firstly busted for refusing to move on after being requested to do so for forty odd minutes. He was charged at the police station by an officer who was most probably totally clueless that Weston was quoting Churchill which is not unusual, as most brits are not aware of the quote, as it only appeared for a short while in the first edition. So the quote has been out of print for a very long time. Also you can not expect every police officer to know the quote.
Once the authorities became aware the quote was by Churchill the charges where dropped.
gravenimage says
It shouldn’t have mattered *whom* he was quoting, or whether he was quoting anyone or if the words were his own—he never should have been charged over such a statement in a free country.
The fact that the words were Churchill’s only makes the case more ironic.
Semeru says
The police in this case where rather tolerant.
They took 40 minutes requesting him to move on before busting him
TH says
The man who was quoting Churchill on mahomedanism a politician called Weston and at the time he was a candidate for the European Parliament. He was arrested and taken to the police station and eventually charged for something or other. The case hasn’t reached the court yet. He is the head of a political party. Hee is an interview with him
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WB7en-eu0X8
John C. Barile says
Good for your friend. People should have the courage to speak out.
tpellow says
Meanwhile, in Islam-compliant U.K-
“British children are being groomed to join jihad, warns aunt of girl who fled to Syria”
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/british-children-are-being-groomed-to-join-jihad-warns-aunt-of-girl-who-fled-to-syria-9788611.html
Ralph says
Wow, he is such a prophet: By the Way the Woman that he RAPED actually Poisoned the Fool and Killed him; such a way to go false prophet and his bones still reside in the soil where he was buried… I think that I could find a better guy than that to put my life in the hands of a Thief, Robber, Murder, Pedophile Idiot.
Larry A. Singleton says
Work in Progress ON JIHAD
I’ve sent out dozens of requests to Muslims to compare these two works; Humaid’s article on jihad…
Link here:
http://www.ummah.com/forum/showthread.php?233460-Jihad-in-the-Qur-an-and-Sunnah&s=4df3fc2e4e0596eb3b38115ef4b8f506 ),
And here:
Jihad in the Qur’an and Sunnah by ‘Abdullâh bin Muhammad bin Humaid
http://www.islaam.net/main/display.php?category=77&id=129
or:
http://www.guidance4yoursoul.net/Jihad%20In%20The%20Qur'an%20And%20Sunnah.pdf
The True Color of Humanitarian Muhammad Dr. Radhasyam Brahmachari
http://www.islam-watch.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=663:the-true-color-of-humanitarian-muhammad&catid=73:brahmachari&Itemid=58
Humanitarian Muhammad: Did Muhammad Abolish Slavery? By Dr. Radhasyam Brahmachari
http://www.islam-watch.org/authors/73-brahmachari/672-humanitarian-muhammad-did-muhammad-abolish-slavery.html
…and Emmet Fox’s Sermon on the Mount; and and to tell me how Islam can possibly be the “religion of peace”.
I’ve never gotten a response. Correction, I received a NON-answer from Dr. Mohsen El-Guindy suggesting that I read his books. I didn’t read his books but I printed out and read several of his lengthy “articles”. I can’t believe this guy is able to put a “Doctor” in front of his name. He not only sounds like a crazy man but he does absolutely nothing to respond to my challenge. To this day, nobody else has either.
Another man, who does have a deserving title in front of his name, is the Reverend Richard Wurmbrand. It’s men like him, and his experiences as a Missionary in Communist Russia, that teach me the differences and the realities of who the legitimate men of God are. A perfect example is the description of the word “martyr” on page eight of his book “Tortured for Christ”:
“According to the original Greek, “martyr” means “witness”. The writer of Hebrews states that “we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses [martyrs]” (12:1), and Jesus instructs us in Acts 1:8, “You shall be witnesses [martyrs] to Me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the end of the earth.” The New Testament martyr not only personally testified to the truth and power of Jesus Christ, but was instructed to take that witness to others, regardless of the cost. Later in the book of Acts, we read about the stoning of Stephen, making him the first to pay the ultimate price for that witness. It is at this time that the word martyr took on a much stronger meaning as one who not only is a witness but as one who is willing to give his life or to be martyred for that cause.”
In my copy of Tortured For Christ I’ve got the last four words double underlined; “martyred for that cause”.
Sheikh bin Humaid uses the word “martyr” in his article on Jihad eleven times. I’m pretty sure that those martyrs aren’t meant to die without a sword in their hand. (Or dynamite and ball bearings wrapped around their waist) Which reminds me of the one aspect of the challenge I included when I asked Muslims to compare what would have to be the ultimate in their respective works:
If Islam is the “religion of peace”, where in Sheikh Abdullah bin Humaid’s article on jihad can I find the equivalent of “Love Thy Neighbor” and “good will toward men”? And explain its prominence, and significance almost as an “Introduction”, in a book that’s described as “the most authentic and true among the books of the Prophet”: My Summarized Sahih Al-Bukhari. Also address “jihad” as it’s defined in Reliance of the Traveller and answer the same question. (Chapter O-9.0: Jihad O: “Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion.” And explain why the “greater” jihad is only mentioned once here and never seen again in this “Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law”.)
Also compare Humaid’s “jihad” and Emmet Fox’ Sermon on the Mount and tell me which one best represents a spirit of Love and “compassion”.
Lastly; would you pick Sheik bin Humaid to sit on a Human Rights Commission? (That’s a trick question by the way.)
I’ve posted this many times to many Muslims and have yet to get a single response. Well, as I said, I did receive a response from that goofball “Dr.” Mohsen El-Guindy asking me to read his books. Instead I downloaded a bunch of his articles. Which were pure rants. An Imam, sidestepped it by telling me I had to “study Islam” to gain a greater understanding.
The world over Muslims are murdering Buddhists. And using the word “murder” is putting it kindly. In all of Islamic literature; Sahih Muslim, Sahih Bukhari, The Koran and especially Reliance of the Traveller where can you find teachings that would result in the following story?:
This is from the book “the Wisdom of Forgiveness” by His Holiness the Dalai lama and Victor Chan. Pages 47 and 48:
“Whenever the Dalai lama talks about forgiveness, he likes to use as an example the story of Lopon-la, a Lhasa monk he knew before the Chinese occupation. ‘After I escaped from Tibet, Lopon-la put in prison by Chinese’, the Dalai Lama told me. ‘he stayed there eighteen years. When he finally free, he came to India. For twenty years, I did not see him. But he seemed the same. Of course looked older. But physically OK. His mind still sharp after so many years in prison. He was still same gentle monk. He told me the Chines forced him to denounce his religion. They tortured him many times in prison. I asked him whether he was ever afraid. Lopon-la then told me: ‘Yes, there was one thing I was afraid of. I was afraid I may lose compassion for the Chinese.’”
I’d like to know, when I look at the pictures of the wild-eyed, frothing at the mouth fanatics in pictures and TV, where is that spirit of love and forgiveness when they’re shouting “alahu-akbar”? I can’t even find it in Taha’s Second Message of Islam. Here’s an exerpt of what I DO find;
“we may describe it, (jihad), as a surgeon’s lancet and not a butcher’s knife.” Mahmoud Mohammed Taha (I’m sure there are about 200 million dead people that would disagree with him. And this from the guy who’s been called the Mahatma Ghandi of Islam.)
I’ve got a neat little “poster”; one side is a picture of a bunch of screaming, frothing at the mouth Arabs and on the panel beside that a picture of a Jew in a labcoat. The caption below says: “In 2007 Islam and Judaism’s holiest holidays overlapped for 10 days. Muslims racked up 397 dead bodies in 94 terror attacks across 10 countries during this time… ….while Jews worked on their 159th Nobel Prize.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2169455/replies?c=8
http://plancksconstant.org/blog1/2007/11/the_difference_between_jews_and_muslims.html
The 4th Conference of the Academy of Islamic Research: Arab Theologians on Jews and Israel. Sept. 1968 Translated by D.F. Green (Support Secure Freedom)Front to back; 95 pages of outrageous lies and vile Jew-Hatred.
http://supportsecurefreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/Arab-Theologians-on-Jews-and-Israel-4th_Ed_082011.pdf
You will, literally, not believe your eyes as you read this outrageous document. I mean it is jaw-dropping un-believable. Truly an example of “you have to see it to believe it”.
Dr. Wafa Sultan exposes Islamic values with Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammad
http://www.mrctv.org/videos/dr-wafa-sultan-exposes-islamic-values-sheikh-omar-bakri-muhammad
This less than 8-minute video segment, if viewed objectively and dispassionately, could do more to educate the American public on the theory animating the practice of “Islamic international relations,” without any further explanation required. Andrew G. Bostom-The Legacy of Jihad and The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism.
No Fear says
I have spoken to many muslims about Mohammed’s behaviour. They do not care that Mohammed behaved like Genghis Khan. They are only interested in whether Mohammed’s Quran will produce a society which can prevail, which can WIN over non-muslims. Morality is not relevant, winning is the only concern. Mohammed could behave like Hitler for all they care ……as long as he is a good leader for the Ummah then that is all that matters. The only use for morality is to produce good soldiers for the tribe.
Kepha says
The USA needs to amend its immigration laws to bar British judges and barristers.
RICHTHOFEN says
Britain, with its PC, Quisling leadership is pathetic! I am ashamed to be British – any heritage Brit now has a status lower than any alien or false, so-called, ‘asylum seeker’. They are petrified of the medieval, hate and murder/rape/paedophile mongering alien cult invaders – kow-towing to them. No wonder ISIL believe they can do just as they please – nobody has the courage to stop them. Hitler would be proud of his islamic role model – finishing the job for him! And we just sit by and let them – mesmerised by our puppet mistress Fuehrerin Merkel and such important issue as forcing through abominations such as invert so-called ‘marriage’ whilst our country is subjugated – talk about Nero! We are being sleepwalked to oblivion – genocide of the British race, by any other name. The above is just another of the millions of nauseating examples
Ed Taylor says
Why would they get mad at the man for the comparison?
A religion founded by a pedophile is not is a position to judge anyone else, and the British have chosen to hasten their country’s demise..
Horace Yo says
Although it is necessary to continue giving reasoned refutations of the Islamic onslaught, it may be helpful to consider that Islam is the work of the evil one-“the ruler of this world”(J) as is communism. The general destruction and downfall of our western culture is proceeding with the energetic compliance of the western leftist parties who are the dispensers of socialist favors to their willfully uninformed constituencies who care only about continuing handouts and support and adulation for their pop culture immoralities. The reason the Crown Prosecution Service and the Police Sergeant attack the Christian preacher is that they are in the service of evil. They know what they are doing, just like the German soldiers who threw the Jews into the gas chambers and ovens. They are destroying their country and becoming bloodthirsty savages ready to slaughter . The evil destructive communists and muslims have infiltrated every government department and they get rid of all the good judges and cops and people and replace them with their own braindead minions.
sandy says
I believe that Mohammad or what ever muslims believe he was Pedofile he marry small girl..in 6 years old but sleep when was 9 years old….Its mean all this mean all this is fake is dead reliogion.Jesus pray for childs and dont was married because God send him on earth do what God want…. And i have quetion why muslims get angry when anyone say thrue in those face????? Just because they are sick pedofiles who think is normal to marry small girls and sleep with them….
DDrake says
Britain has become the armpit and @$$hole of the world, concerning true freedom and liberty. It will be their destruction. Those who reject God are fools.
Krishnadas says
I’ll definately be out on the streets this December selling Hare Krishna books by His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Prabhupada, especially to deluded Moslems 🙂 Good luck to them calling me racist.
gravenimage says
UK: Christian street preacher charged with “religious aggravation” for comparing Jesus and Muhammad
………………………..
Utter madness—especially given the open calls for bloody violence from Muslim hate preachers like Anjem Chaudary.
Some here have said that it is unlikely that Mike Overd will be convicted—but as with so many of these actions intended to curtail freedom of speech, it hardly matters.
How many preachers and other speakers in the future will remember this case and the grief, output of time and money, and damage to his reputation that Overd will suffer, and will simply *self-censor* should they think of saying something equally truthful?
Ultimately, that is the main purpose of such grotesqueries as the “religious aggravation” statute.
Jay Boo says
““The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends.”
Was Aisha really a girly boy or was Aisha’s mother trying to protect the 6 year old from Muhammad’s lust driven desires by cutting her hair and it backfired and enticed weak willed false prophet even more?
We may never know.
gravenimage says
We will never know for sure, Jay Boo, but I have always thought that little Aisha’s hair fell out from the stress of being “married” so young and knowing that the “Prophet” would soon demand the consummation.
Peter says
Muhammad violated most of the Ten Commandments:
2.Thou shall bring no false idols before me. (Satanic verses)
6.Thou shall not kill/murder.
7.Thou shall not commit adultery.
8.Thou shall not steal.
9.Thou shall not bear false witness against your neighbor
10.Thou shall not covet your neighbor’s wife (or anything that belongs to your neighbor).
Jesus violated none.
The comparison is clear enough.
Barnabas says
How did you end up exactly the opposite of what Moses brought you? You are uncircumcised (filthy), you eat pork (strictly forbidden), you drink alcohol (strictly forbidden), you fornicate like animals(capital offense), your women dress and act like prostitutes, you don’t fast, you don’t read scripture, you believe in trinity (clear violation of the 1st commandment), you blaspheme (by worshiping and deifying a human) etc.
According to the law of Moses you are to be slaughtered when the Jewish king soon comes into power. You worship a pagan deity. Jesus is Zeus not The Son of Mary.
Now that you know the truth, you have no more excuses! You can still repent and save yourselves. Never despair, never lose hope. Find the truth and it will set you free.
Western Canadian says
If someone has the time and a loon to English dictionary, could they possibly translate this drivel for me?
Jay Boo says
We will need a troll dictionary to translate comment of Barnabas
I suspect that Barnabas is a smug leftist who wishes to be seen as defending Muhammad
Barnabas says
Are you related to Honey Boo Boo?
Jay Boo says
Barnabas
Muhammad quoted the satanic verses yet, he claimed he was a prophet who was tricked by Satan.
If Muhammad could be tricked so easily by Satan, then why should anyone trust anything that such a buffoon said?
Champ says
Barnabas
Champ says
Barnabas, your comment is like finding a fly in my soup …
gravenimage says
What absolute crap from “Barnabas”. Devout Jews aren’t threatening Christians—homicidal Muslims are.
gravenimage says
Also, “Barnaba’s” claim that Judaism “strictly forbids” the drinking of alcohol is complete bs—devout Jews drink wine.
Drunkeness is frowned upon, but wine is drunk on Shabbat and Jewish holidays, including at the Passover Seder.
I believe the obvious Taqiyya artist “Barnabas” is confusing his “Abrahamic faiths”…
Barnabas says
What a purely foolish and ignorant statement that is!
Daniel was a devout son of Israel. He is my role model!
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel%201
Uncle Vladdi says
Their “Religious Aggravation” offense = “Daring To Challenge Superstition!”
i.e: “Free speeach ist verboten in der Caliphreich!”
Barrie gunn says
so when Muslims run around the UK saying and doing what they like
Why are the police not doing anything we as UK born citizens can’t say anything to the scum that come to OUR country to clams OUR benefit
To UK police need to wake up before their is fighting in our streets
Mike O'Conner says
Well Jesus and Mohammad are comparable.
Jesus was a man; God incarnate… . While Mohammad was a man; evil incarnate.
Christ brought humanity God’s grace of eternal life, while Mohammad brought man Chaos, Calamity and Catastrophe…, death, destruction and eternal anguish.
They’re practically the same, for diametrically opposing forces.