I mean no offence to Muslims
after all is it really possible to insult a Muslim greater than they insult themselves?
Sing it, DJ.
MO did it.
MO did it.
Islam’s tower DJ sings a call of duty to prayer
with a cadence shrieked from his wretched devil’s lair.
Seduced by lyrics of Mecca’s prophetic liar,
his song submits to Satan’s every unholy desire.
If you ask him why, he will recite MO’s lie.
He won’t sing of MO’s adultery.
He won’t confess Islam’s blasphemy.
He won’t mention Muslim disgrace.
He sings to honor each prayer mat child rape.
Sing it, tower DJ.
Abrogation’s abomination
Admit it.
I had no idea Bosch Fawstin was a Muslim originally until five minutes ago. Not sure how I missed that for the last decade plus I’ve seen his work.
Mosays
@ Beagle
“I had no idea Bosch Fawstin was a Muslim originally until five minutes ago. Not sure how I missed that for the last decade plus I’ve seen his work.”
I was right now going to say the same thing! I’ve not seen much of his work, but I still should have known that basic fact.
KrazyKafirsays
Bosch Fawstin, an American Hero.
Wellingtonsays
Fine interview with no nonsense replies by Bosch Fawstin. I have enjoyed and respected Fawstin’s drawings, which are first-rate (really loved his depiction of a very menacing-looking Mohammed with the word “submit” below his image) and have a high regard for his courage in opposing the spiritual totalitarian ideology which is Islam. Thank you, Bosch Fawstin, for being who you are.
Great interview! …yeah, I had no idea, either, that Bosch was raised muslim.
I wrote down a couple of things that Bosch said that I thought were noteworthy about islam & company …
“We are guilty until proven muslim ..that’s the way islam works ..the only innocent are muslims. Period. But they need that ..they need that propaganda”
And …
“Our governments job, post 911, has been to protect islam …Defend islam! Defend islam! …from GW to obama.”
islam is such a sick and evil ideology that brings nothing but hell on earth.
Great interview. Bosch Fastwin has physical charisma (an important element in social & entertainment & news media) and a good concise delivery in response to the questions. Given what this was, a relatively short interview with a (thankfully) respectful interviewer (exceedingly rare in the mainstream on this issue), I see no constructive criticism necessary; but I do most emphatically think that our general communication of this problem has to formulate a cogent and concise way to explain the problem of the moderate Muslim: I.e., we need to take the next step after explaining that Islam itself is not moderate — which BF did well — to explaining why there exist so many seemingly harmless Muslims out there (and all around us in the West), and why their harmlessness is only seeming.
That is the subtler and more difficult challenge in the battle space of the war of ideas in which all of us, no matter how we do it and whether we even know it, are deputized as soldiers of one sort or another.
I have a good idea for Bosch Fawstin for a comic book character (related to my last post); if Bosch you are interested, either email me or I will post something on my blog soon about it.
duh_swamisays
‘I naturally phased out of it…’ Doin what comes naturally’, ain’t always that easy…200 swami’s give a standing applause…
rubiconcrestsays
They say a picture is worth a thousand words, well this man of few words, wastes none when describing Islam.
THsays
Bill Warner has counted the number of instances of Jew hatred in Mein Kamp and in the Qu´ran and the Qurán wins. This is a fact.
Henrysays
Bosch, thank you for your courage, and integrity! I didn’t know anything about you till now, but I look forward to getting more aquainted with your work. Good interview, and the piece linked to very thought provoking.
Kephasays
A hat tip to Bosch. Maybe I’ll buy his graphic novel.
Still, seeing how he’s a guy who thinks about what he’s doing, I’d recommend to him Rodney Stark’s _Triumph of Reason_.
I am troubled by a number of assertions (all essentially permutations of one assertion) in the blog piece Bosch Fawstin (BF) provided above explaining his position:
“Muslims who take Islam seriously are at war with us and Muslims who don’t aren’t.”
This seems to rest on a sweeping assumption of what reasonably must be millions, even hundreds of millions, of Muslims all over the world — a sweeping assumption in their favor (benefit of the doubt).
Certainly, BF doesn’t leave it there but does offer a degree of guarded skepticism about all these (seemingly) non-extremist Muslims:
“But that doesn’t mean we should consider these reluctant Muslims allies against Jihad… The problem I have with many of these essentially non-Muslim Muslims, especially in the middle of this war being waged on us by their more consistent co-religionists, is that they give the enemy cover.”
How do these “non-Muslim Muslims” give the enemy cover?
“They force us to play a game of Muslim Roulette since we can’t tell which Muslim is going to blow himself up until he does. And their indifference about the evil being committed in the name of their religion is a big reason why their reputation is where it is.”
BF also uses other terms to flesh out the description of this “indifference” — namely, “their silence and inaction against jihad “.
However, given the essential problem we are faced with, which BF acknowledges — to wit, the game of Muslim Roulette since we can’t tell which Muslim is going to blow himself up until he does. . BF, like most Jihad Watchers, acknowledges this, but simultaneously assumes a sweeping knowledge about Muslims that contradicts this Muslim Roulette problem. In his case, he seems to base this on his personal experience — viz., “I’ve been around Muslims my entire life and most of them truly don’t care about Islam.”
I’m sorry, but this isn’t enough to solve the Muslim Roulette problem.
It’s also interesting how many terms BF comes up with to describe these Muslims who somehow wiggle out of the Muslim Roulette problem (even as at the same time they are, as he himself points out, facilitating that very problem):
Muslims who don’t take Islam seriously
reluctant Muslims
essentially non-Muslim Muslims
less consistent Muslims (the negative complement of his phrase “more consistent co-religionists”)
indifferent Muslims
Muslims who truly don’t care about Islam.
I don’t dispute that any one or more of these types of Muslims exist; the point is, this hypothetical existence is of no pragmatic usefulness to us, if we can’t actually know — as BF himself acknowledges — “which Muslim is going to blow himself up until he does” . Obviously, this means that all those types of Muslims I listed from BF’s various descriptions cannot be differentiated — with a reliability sufficient for our #1 priority, our public safety — from the dangerous Muslims. So why does BF bring them up and use them in his argument? (And why do so many Jihad Watchers do the same?).
More Fawstian permutations of the crypto-Moderate Muslim:
Objectively good human beings, who identify themselves as Muslim
Non-observant Muslims
personally peaceful individual Muslims
your average Muslim [who] is morally superior to Mohammad
Of these Muslims, Fawstin says that they “are not our problem, but neither are they the solution to our problem.” This clearly implies that for him, he is assuming that these types of Muslim (all basically one type in different configurations) are passively inert, not helping us, but also not hurting us. How is this not aiding and abetting the deadly game of Muslim Roulette? Unless he agrees that such Muslims should be treated by us with the same suspicion we would treat the other Muslims (this would be logical for him, given his agreement that we can’t tell the difference between these two types anyway) — in which case one wonders why he insists on calling attention to the distinction, as reflected in the various formulations of that distinction in which his brief article is positively replete, as my list has documented.
R Colesays
Not surprising – the first people to rise the alarm – or to realize the seriousness of the matter – were either ex-Muslims or those who spent time in the Islamic world.
They are saying this is what Islam teaches. But because to most is this all so unbelievable – it is easier to believe that these people – are being hateful – towards all Muslims.
It is just assumed that all major religions express more or less the same message. But in certain fundamental areas of Islam – you would be mistaken.
:: ::
Quite an hilarious video here – one ISIS supporter invites non-Muslims to come and live in the Islamic State. The jizya tax is cheap and although you can’t be equal to a Muslim – as non-Muslims must be humiliated – he says – come and support the Muslims!
Tells Muslims – stop distancing themselves from it.
Next you’ll see a CNN poll – Would you move to Islamic State ?
Do you think it’s racist to call Islamic State bad?
Tell us what you think?
Richard T.says
The belief, Muslims is a religion of peace, is once again debunked by this brave, courageous, and patriotic American. The interview was truthful, honest, and sincere. As American’s, we must continue to speak out against these barbaric attacks on innocent people. No religion promotes killing of innocent people…..period! Our Government needs to get it’s act together and start calling these savages for what they really are….terrorists!
paddysays
I’m sooo fucking annoyed.
We don’t get any tv airtime with stuff like this in the UK.
Don’t get me wrong…I love Americans and they are a bunch of assholes but at least they (don’t) admit it.
Richard T.says
Bunch of assholes……..No country in the world has done more to promote justice, equality, and freedom than the United States…….It is amazing that foreigners bash America but they are all dying to get in this great country…..your comment is disgraceful!
paddysays
That’s the problem with you yanks…you only look to yourselves. I speak as a friend and an ally here in the UK. Forget the people who went to look for America and focus on these cunts who are here in the UK and at your backdoor.
These fucking muslim bastards, who think that they own where they are because god willed it, have absolutely nothing, I repeat, nothing to offer to women, children and men in our free world.
Wellingtonsays
With respect, paddy, no political entity in the history of man has more looked out for others than has America. I submit to you that no military in the history of mankind has produced so many military personnel who sacrificed themselves for the freedom of those who were not citizens of the same entity that these military personnel were. No exceptions.
As Colin Powell put it, American soldiers, sailors and airmen have given their lives for the liberty of huge numbers of non-Americans and all the real estate America has asked for is enough earth to bury these brave men in. Moreover, America, through such initiatives as the Marshall Plan, has rescued and revitalized more economies than any political entity in the history of mankind has. Hell, if America could get back just HALF of what it has loaned to other nations it would eliminate its national debt overnight. Christ Almighty, what more do you want to realize the extraordinary altruism that America has engaged in time and time and time again?
Reconsider. You should most definitely. Right now, I count you ignorant and ungrateful.
Your turn.
GbAsays
All this palaver, though mainly accurate, can be boiled down to one sentence:
Every Muslim lies about his beliefs because if he becomes an apostate he is targeted for death!
Jay Boo says
I mean no offence to Muslims
after all is it really possible to insult a Muslim greater than they insult themselves?
Sing it, DJ.
MO did it.
MO did it.
Islam’s tower DJ sings a call of duty to prayer
with a cadence shrieked from his wretched devil’s lair.
Seduced by lyrics of Mecca’s prophetic liar,
his song submits to Satan’s every unholy desire.
If you ask him why, he will recite MO’s lie.
He won’t sing of MO’s adultery.
He won’t confess Islam’s blasphemy.
He won’t mention Muslim disgrace.
He sings to honor each prayer mat child rape.
Sing it, tower DJ.
Abrogation’s abomination
Admit it.
MO did it.
MO did it.
Judi says
Excellent interview.
Beagle says
I had no idea Bosch Fawstin was a Muslim originally until five minutes ago. Not sure how I missed that for the last decade plus I’ve seen his work.
Mo says
@ Beagle
“I had no idea Bosch Fawstin was a Muslim originally until five minutes ago. Not sure how I missed that for the last decade plus I’ve seen his work.”
I was right now going to say the same thing! I’ve not seen much of his work, but I still should have known that basic fact.
KrazyKafir says
Bosch Fawstin, an American Hero.
Wellington says
Fine interview with no nonsense replies by Bosch Fawstin. I have enjoyed and respected Fawstin’s drawings, which are first-rate (really loved his depiction of a very menacing-looking Mohammed with the word “submit” below his image) and have a high regard for his courage in opposing the spiritual totalitarian ideology which is Islam. Thank you, Bosch Fawstin, for being who you are.
Bosch Fawstin says
Thanks, Wellingtton.
Salah says
The Golden Rule of Muhammad (What the Qur’an says about non-Muslims.)
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2012/10/infidel.html
Champ says
Great interview! …yeah, I had no idea, either, that Bosch was raised muslim.
I wrote down a couple of things that Bosch said that I thought were noteworthy about islam & company …
“We are guilty until proven muslim ..that’s the way islam works ..the only innocent are muslims. Period. But they need that ..they need that propaganda”
And …
“Our governments job, post 911, has been to protect islam …Defend islam! Defend islam! …from GW to obama.”
islam is such a sick and evil ideology that brings nothing but hell on earth.
Go Pigman! ..and Bosch is the superhero here 🙂
voegelinian says
Great interview. Bosch Fastwin has physical charisma (an important element in social & entertainment & news media) and a good concise delivery in response to the questions. Given what this was, a relatively short interview with a (thankfully) respectful interviewer (exceedingly rare in the mainstream on this issue), I see no constructive criticism necessary; but I do most emphatically think that our general communication of this problem has to formulate a cogent and concise way to explain the problem of the moderate Muslim: I.e., we need to take the next step after explaining that Islam itself is not moderate — which BF did well — to explaining why there exist so many seemingly harmless Muslims out there (and all around us in the West), and why their harmlessness is only seeming.
That is the subtler and more difficult challenge in the battle space of the war of ideas in which all of us, no matter how we do it and whether we even know it, are deputized as soldiers of one sort or another.
voegelinian says
I have a good idea for Bosch Fawstin for a comic book character (related to my last post); if Bosch you are interested, either email me or I will post something on my blog soon about it.
duh_swami says
‘I naturally phased out of it…’ Doin what comes naturally’, ain’t always that easy…200 swami’s give a standing applause…
rubiconcrest says
They say a picture is worth a thousand words, well this man of few words, wastes none when describing Islam.
TH says
Bill Warner has counted the number of instances of Jew hatred in Mein Kamp and in the Qu´ran and the Qurán wins. This is a fact.
Henry says
Bosch, thank you for your courage, and integrity! I didn’t know anything about you till now, but I look forward to getting more aquainted with your work. Good interview, and the piece linked to very thought provoking.
Kepha says
A hat tip to Bosch. Maybe I’ll buy his graphic novel.
Still, seeing how he’s a guy who thinks about what he’s doing, I’d recommend to him Rodney Stark’s _Triumph of Reason_.
voegelinian says
I am troubled by a number of assertions (all essentially permutations of one assertion) in the blog piece Bosch Fawstin (BF) provided above explaining his position:
“Muslims who take Islam seriously are at war with us and Muslims who don’t aren’t.”
This seems to rest on a sweeping assumption of what reasonably must be millions, even hundreds of millions, of Muslims all over the world — a sweeping assumption in their favor (benefit of the doubt).
Certainly, BF doesn’t leave it there but does offer a degree of guarded skepticism about all these (seemingly) non-extremist Muslims:
“But that doesn’t mean we should consider these reluctant Muslims allies against Jihad… The problem I have with many of these essentially non-Muslim Muslims, especially in the middle of this war being waged on us by their more consistent co-religionists, is that they give the enemy cover.”
How do these “non-Muslim Muslims” give the enemy cover?
“They force us to play a game of Muslim Roulette since we can’t tell which Muslim is going to blow himself up until he does. And their indifference about the evil being committed in the name of their religion is a big reason why their reputation is where it is.”
BF also uses other terms to flesh out the description of this “indifference” — namely, “their silence and inaction against jihad “.
However, given the essential problem we are faced with, which BF acknowledges — to wit, the game of Muslim Roulette since we can’t tell which Muslim is going to blow himself up until he does. . BF, like most Jihad Watchers, acknowledges this, but simultaneously assumes a sweeping knowledge about Muslims that contradicts this Muslim Roulette problem. In his case, he seems to base this on his personal experience — viz., “I’ve been around Muslims my entire life and most of them truly don’t care about Islam.”
I’m sorry, but this isn’t enough to solve the Muslim Roulette problem.
It’s also interesting how many terms BF comes up with to describe these Muslims who somehow wiggle out of the Muslim Roulette problem (even as at the same time they are, as he himself points out, facilitating that very problem):
Muslims who don’t take Islam seriously
reluctant Muslims
essentially non-Muslim Muslims
less consistent Muslims (the negative complement of his phrase “more consistent co-religionists”)
indifferent Muslims
Muslims who truly don’t care about Islam.
I don’t dispute that any one or more of these types of Muslims exist; the point is, this hypothetical existence is of no pragmatic usefulness to us, if we can’t actually know — as BF himself acknowledges — “which Muslim is going to blow himself up until he does” . Obviously, this means that all those types of Muslims I listed from BF’s various descriptions cannot be differentiated — with a reliability sufficient for our #1 priority, our public safety — from the dangerous Muslims. So why does BF bring them up and use them in his argument? (And why do so many Jihad Watchers do the same?).
voegelinian says
More Fawstian permutations of the crypto-Moderate Muslim:
Objectively good human beings, who identify themselves as Muslim
Non-observant Muslims
personally peaceful individual Muslims
your average Muslim [who] is morally superior to Mohammad
Of these Muslims, Fawstin says that they “are not our problem, but neither are they the solution to our problem.” This clearly implies that for him, he is assuming that these types of Muslim (all basically one type in different configurations) are passively inert, not helping us, but also not hurting us. How is this not aiding and abetting the deadly game of Muslim Roulette? Unless he agrees that such Muslims should be treated by us with the same suspicion we would treat the other Muslims (this would be logical for him, given his agreement that we can’t tell the difference between these two types anyway) — in which case one wonders why he insists on calling attention to the distinction, as reflected in the various formulations of that distinction in which his brief article is positively replete, as my list has documented.
R Cole says
Not surprising – the first people to rise the alarm – or to realize the seriousness of the matter – were either ex-Muslims or those who spent time in the Islamic world.
They are saying this is what Islam teaches. But because to most is this all so unbelievable – it is easier to believe that these people – are being hateful – towards all Muslims.
It is just assumed that all major religions express more or less the same message. But in certain fundamental areas of Islam – you would be mistaken.
:: ::
Quite an hilarious video here – one ISIS supporter invites non-Muslims to come and live in the Islamic State. The jizya tax is cheap and although you can’t be equal to a Muslim – as non-Muslims must be humiliated – he says – come and support the Muslims!
British Islamist Abu Baraa in Support of ISIS: We Can Start Having Slave Girls Again
Tells Muslims – stop distancing themselves from it.
Next you’ll see a CNN poll – Would you move to Islamic State ?
Do you think it’s racist to call Islamic State bad?
Tell us what you think?
Richard T. says
The belief, Muslims is a religion of peace, is once again debunked by this brave, courageous, and patriotic American. The interview was truthful, honest, and sincere. As American’s, we must continue to speak out against these barbaric attacks on innocent people. No religion promotes killing of innocent people…..period! Our Government needs to get it’s act together and start calling these savages for what they really are….terrorists!
paddy says
I’m sooo fucking annoyed.
We don’t get any tv airtime with stuff like this in the UK.
Don’t get me wrong…I love Americans and they are a bunch of assholes but at least they (don’t) admit it.
Richard T. says
Bunch of assholes……..No country in the world has done more to promote justice, equality, and freedom than the United States…….It is amazing that foreigners bash America but they are all dying to get in this great country…..your comment is disgraceful!
paddy says
That’s the problem with you yanks…you only look to yourselves. I speak as a friend and an ally here in the UK. Forget the people who went to look for America and focus on these cunts who are here in the UK and at your backdoor.
These fucking muslim bastards, who think that they own where they are because god willed it, have absolutely nothing, I repeat, nothing to offer to women, children and men in our free world.
Wellington says
With respect, paddy, no political entity in the history of man has more looked out for others than has America. I submit to you that no military in the history of mankind has produced so many military personnel who sacrificed themselves for the freedom of those who were not citizens of the same entity that these military personnel were. No exceptions.
As Colin Powell put it, American soldiers, sailors and airmen have given their lives for the liberty of huge numbers of non-Americans and all the real estate America has asked for is enough earth to bury these brave men in. Moreover, America, through such initiatives as the Marshall Plan, has rescued and revitalized more economies than any political entity in the history of mankind has. Hell, if America could get back just HALF of what it has loaned to other nations it would eliminate its national debt overnight. Christ Almighty, what more do you want to realize the extraordinary altruism that America has engaged in time and time and time again?
Reconsider. You should most definitely. Right now, I count you ignorant and ungrateful.
Your turn.
GbA says
All this palaver, though mainly accurate, can be boiled down to one sentence:
Every Muslim lies about his beliefs because if he becomes an apostate he is targeted for death!
No Muslim can be trusted further than taqiyya.