• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

India: Muslim slaps actress for wearing skimpy outfits “despite being a Muslim”

Nov 30, 2014 5:24 pm By Robert Spencer

gauhar-khan-bigg-boss-dec-28-12-13_0_0_0_0_0_0_0“Men are the managers of the affairs of women for that God has preferred in bounty one of them over another, and for that they have expended of their property. Righteous women are therefore obedient, guarding the secret for God’s guarding. And those you fear may be rebellious admonish; banish them to their couches, and beat them.” (Qur’an 4:34)

“Actor Gauhar Khan slapped for ‘skimpy’ dress,” by Nitasha Natu, TNN, December 1, 2014 (thanks to Jaladhi):

MUMBAI: Bollywood actor Gauhar Khan was slapped by a member of the audience while she was shooting for a television show at FilmCity on Sunday night.

The accused, Mohammad Akil Malik, 24, was pinned down by security persons on the sets and handed over to the Aarey Colony police. Officials said Malik had objected to the actor’s dress sense and for dancing to racy numbers. He also tried to touch her. He is likely to be booked on charges of molestation and assault.

Khan has been hosting a music reality show for a TV channel. She was shooting for the grand finale of the show on Sunday at studio no. 9 in FilmCity. “Malik had been coming over to the show, as a member of the audience, for the past two to three days. He had been observing Khan. Around 8pm on Sunday, while the shoot was on, Malik suddenly got up and went on the stage. He tried to touch Khan who was taken aback and resisted. Malik then slapped her. He asked her how she could wear skimpy outfits and dance to cheap songs despite being a Muslim,” a police official said.

Contestants on the show and security persons rushed to Khan’s aid. They overpowered Malik before calling the cops. Sources said Malik was manhandled. “We have sent him for a medical examination to find out if he was drunk,” said zonal DCP Panjabrao Ugle….

One has to be drunk to express Islamic piety?

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, India, Jihadist intimidation and thuggery, Sharia, women's rights in Islam Tagged With: Guahar Khan, Mohammad Akil Malik


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Champ says

    Nov 30, 2014 at 5:30 pm

    Am I in a time machine and back in the stone age? …wow mohammedans are savages!

    • Jim Horn says

      Dec 1, 2014 at 10:14 am

      Moslem men are driven insane by the culture they live in – Mohammedism. MOSLEM MEN FEAR WOMEN is a new book that will help readers, especially females to better understand the insane hatred of Moslem men who desperately fear women.

      • BC says

        Dec 1, 2014 at 11:49 am

        People who believe in something that does not exist and in things that never happened are by definition suffering a degree of insanity

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 3, 2014 at 10:14 pm

          And that’s why Christian, and Jewish, and Buddhist men regularly attack women for being “immodestly” dressed…

          Oh, wait—no they don’t. That is what BC is trying to imply, though. Witless moral equivalence.

  2. Truth says

    Nov 30, 2014 at 5:32 pm

    The Muslim prophet Mohammad was an evil child molester ( he married a 6 year old little girl), and was an evil supporter of slavery. Nobody should follow him anywhere.

    • Riyaz says

      Dec 2, 2014 at 4:00 am

      Can you tell me the age difference between Joesph and Mary ? how many wifes did soloman and lord kirshna had ? What this topic has to do with Prophet Mohammed , Why does Nun’s ware full cloths ? Why does in religion’s women’s are asked to cover their head , first know your and study religion before pointing on others , what do you call the people of RSS and Vishwa Hindu Parishad when they say Rapes happened in India , not in Bharat and many other shit about woman law , sati law untouchable , widow practice . , why do most numbers of rape’s happened in western countries , and in India it is mostly by North Indians who are from Hindu Family check the police records what you call of the act , when Indian Hindu kings use to fuck any woman on the streets , same thing happened in every kingdom , this is a individual act , his mentality is corrupt , Islam doesn’t speak of hitting women, there is a law men and women in every religion, 1st read it , before you pointing out anything on others .

      • albert says

        Dec 2, 2014 at 3:55 pm

        In muslim countries it takes four female witnesses to accuse a man of rape ,and even if she is believed she may be stoned to death, that is why many thousands of rapes in muslim countries are not reported, another reason is that the police are muslim men and automatically sympathise with the perpetrator.

        • P Setra says

          Jan 3, 2015 at 11:13 am

          If they were watching, why were they watching and not doing anything to stop the rape? They were just watching ‘the floor show’. They must be perverts. Does Islam support perversion?

      • BlueRaven says

        Dec 2, 2014 at 5:35 pm

        Did it ever occur to you the definition of a rape is different in the Western countries to that in Islamic ones, for instance in Sweden, a wife can report a rape if she did not agree to her husband’s demand for sex one night and he continued to satisfy his pleasure – are you following this?

        How many wives get sexually thrashed by their husbands which is not considered rape by the definition provided by your sexually pervert prophet – are you still following?

        It requires minimum four MUSLIM witnesses to be considered a rape in any evil Islamic country, as stipulated in the Kuran, otherwise the woman is thrashed by her own family for the sake of the family ‘honor’ for reporting a rape case. How can a Muslim woman report a rape while Allah’s will be refusing to accept her story, unless four MUSLIMs come along and say she was indeed raped – that is some ‘just’ law the woman are up against. Are you still following?

        Apparently, according to well versed Indian JW contributors, the Sati tradition originated when the Muslims started to invade India, and they use to openly rape non-Muslims women, as we see happening in many Western countries. Sati tradition was a way of protecting themselves from the evil intended Muslims, they preferred to be dead than raped by the evil traders (*****MS) – are you still around and following?

      • gravenimage says

        Dec 3, 2014 at 11:13 pm

        A load of Tu Quoque and other apologia from Riyaz:

        Can you tell me the age difference between Joesph and Mary ?
        …………………………………

        Actually, it is never specified. Certainly, the tradition of Joseph as elderly dates to the Middle Ages—it is not in the Bible. More to the point, though, Mary was not a 9-year-old child. Whereas, it is spelled out that the “Prophet” Muhammed was in his fifties when he married six-year-old Aisha—and she was nine when he first raped her.

        And even more salient, there are no Christians “marrying” elementary school children on the model of St. Joseph—but there are pious Muslims all over the world doing just that on the model of the foul “Prophet”.

        More:

        …how many wifes did soloman and lord kirshna had ?
        …………………………………

        The account of Solomon’s actions is descriptive, not proscriptive. It is notable that polygamy is not practiced by Jews or Hindus, but it certainly is by your ugly coreligionists.

        More:

        What this topic has to do with Prophet Mohammed
        …………………………………

        A great deal.

        Here’s Qur’an 33:59:

        “O Prophet! Tell your wives and daughters and the believing women that they should draw over themselves their jilbab (outer garments) (when in public); this will be more conducive to their being recognized (as decent women) and not harassed…”

        This is *exactly* the basis on which this woman was assaulted—women can be lawfully harassed by Muslims if they are not veiled.

        There are many more passages like this in the Hadith.

        More:

        Why does Nun’s ware full cloths ? Why does in religion’s women’s are asked to cover their head , first know your and study religion before pointing on others
        …………………………………

        No Christian woman is forced to become a nun—it is entirely voluntary, and she may leave at any time. Moreover, few nuns wear the full habit and wimple these days.

        Catholic women are asked to wear a head covering in church, and most Christian women not even that. And you would never find a Priest assaulting a woman for not wearing a head covering—this, however, is common among Imams.

        Here is one: “By the age of 10, it becomes an obligation on us to force her to wear Hijab, and if she doesn’t wear Hijab, we hit her “.
        Muhammad Al-Jibaly

        More:

        , what do you call the people of RSS and Vishwa Hindu Parishad when they say Rapes happened in India , not in Bharat and many other shit about woman law , sati law untouchable , widow practice
        …………………………………

        Hindus no longer practice Sati, nor are any people considered untouchable.

        What barbarities of Islam have been abandoned? None—because in Islam no reform is possible.

        More:

        why do most numbers of rape’s happened in western countries
        …………………………………

        Rape is rarely a crime in Muslim countries, so of course the do not keep statistics on it. A little 13-year-old gang rape victim was recently stoned to death in Somalia for daring *to report the crime*. As a victim of rape, she had “admitted” to Zina (unlawful sexual activity). The fact that it was involuntary one her part made no difference.

        Rape victims are also frequently “Honor Killed” by their own families.

        No wonder few victims dare report rape.

        And the rape of Infidel women is not even considered a crime—indeed, raping Infidels, small children, and unveiled women is considered a sacrament in Islam.

        “UK: Muslim rape gang member says raping girls a ‘religious requirement’”

        http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/11/uk-muslim-rape-gang-member-says-raping-girls-a-religious-requirement

        Pious Muslims are raping women in Pakistan, Nigeria, Sudan, the Islamic State, and many other parts of Dar-al-Islam on just this basis.

        More:

        Islam doesn’t speak of hitting women, there is a law men and women in every religion, 1st read it , before you pointing out anything on others .
        …………………………………

        What an utter, bald-faced lie—it’s spelled out in black and white above, in Qur’an 4:34.

        No other faith enshrines the oppression and abuse of women as does Islam.

  3. cs says

    Nov 30, 2014 at 5:41 pm

    Nice lady, a waste of beauty for this animals. They don’t deserve it.

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      Nov 30, 2014 at 6:45 pm

      Betcha she’s a cultural Moslem. But one who keeps her mouth shut so as to not suffer the consequences.

      Khan has been hosting a music reality show…

      Well, they got some of the best video of reality imaginable. They caught perdition unfolding before the eyes of the reality show viewers, who watch to experience how things really are, as in reality. Wait a minute, will they show the Moslem bitch slapping a Moslima episode in the weekly reality episode?

  4. Wellington says

    Nov 30, 2014 at 5:50 pm

    I sometimes catch myself thinking that the most effective route to Islam’s ruination will come by way of the female gender en masse, be such women Muslim or non-Muslim, who once and for all reject Islam because it’s just a cover for guys keeping women in a permanent inferior position (N.B., double entendre fully intended).

    Of course, very possibly, the last group of females on the planet who will continue to make excuses for Islam will be Western academics who have never lived in an Islamic nation, rather like the last major group of defenders of the pernicious nonsense which is Marxism are Western academics who never had to endure existence in a Communist country. Oh yes, when assessing the absolutely silliest, most clueless and most ungrateful group of human beings in all of mankind’s history, one need look no further, I would contend, than modern Western academics (especially those in the so-called liberal arts and humanities area). Arguably, they even, yeah can you believe this, supersede the parasitical Muslim world. Close call here I acknowledge, and reasonable minds can differ, but my money’s on modern Western academics and not Muslims for being the most clueless group of human beings of all time. I mean, the former had so many more opportunities to get rid of their stupidities than did the latter——but they haven’t. Just sayin’.

    • Brian Hoff says

      Nov 30, 2014 at 8:06 pm

      What than Islamophobia you are to judge than whole religion and group on the action of afew.. It Islam was that hostile to women for the last 1400 years it would never have survival at all. Mostly you have never live in than Islamist country at all. America have problen of it own like the injustice in the way black and white are treated by the police.

      • somehistory says

        Nov 30, 2014 at 8:24 pm

        Posters on this site do not accept your islamophobia nonsense. There is still freedom of speech, so if you don’t like reading it, don’t.
        And we are not swallowing any of your nonsense trying to link black and white orchestrated riots, inflamed by msulms who wish jihad and sharia in this country, as an excuse for not speaking about the violence so promulgated by the unholy books. It won’t work.Whites and blacks have it better anywhere islam and it’s phobias…fear of freedom of thought, fear of freedom of worship, fear of freedom of speech, fear of freedom of choice, fear of women being free to leave home with only a credit card, and any and all other freedoms islam fears…..is not practiced.
        islam hasn’t survived because it’s nice to women, but due to the killing of anyone who dares to leave it and the killing of those who refuse to submit.

        But its days are numbered. Your spelling is terrible. How’s your math? You might want to practice up so you can begin counting the days until the beast itself is slaughtered.

        • Tradewinds says

          Dec 1, 2014 at 10:03 pm

          Brian Hoff is the former “defenderofislam” on this site. His constant misuse of “than” is quite humorous.

      • Mark says

        Nov 30, 2014 at 9:16 pm

        A phobia is an unwarranted fear of something, such as spiders or snakes. The emotion that I feel toward Islam is not in the fear column, other than the fear that their evil will spread thru Western Society.
        Blacks in the US are treated better by the police than Christians or Jews are treated by Muslims.

      • Phil says

        Dec 1, 2014 at 3:50 am

        No experience of living in a Muslim country? Sorry mate – you’d lose on that bet! I lived in *Zamalek* as a boy – ring any bells? Not too far from the Qasr al-Nil bridge. Lovely suburb of Cairo, but a bit run-down these days.

        Musulman treatment of women is frequently appalling – and the more devout they are, the worse their treatment of women becomes. Sexual harassment in Cairo is worse than anything a woman would experience in the worst, most underprivileged slum in the West – with rates in the high 90 percents being reported (see the 2013 UN Report – better yet, look at http://www.humanosphere.org/human-rights/2014/10/cairo-women-put-their-assaults-on-map/). I well remember a neighbour, nasty little Ikhwan member, who divorced his long suffering wife after deciding she no longer was what he wanted and she, for once showing some gumption, refused his proposal for a second wife. Three talaqs and she was gone. And don’t even pretend she was treated equitably by the courts…

      • gravenimage says

        Dec 3, 2014 at 11:50 pm

        Brian Hoff—really, “DefenderofIslam”—wrote:

        What than Islamophobia you are to judge than whole religion and group on the action of afew..
        ………………………………

        This is not the “action of afew”—Islam condones unequal rights, rape, forced veiling, polygamy, marital rape, child marriage, wife beating, sex slavery, forced marriage, summary divorce, and “Honor Killing”, and all of this is on the basis of the foul “Prophet” and the canonical texts of Islam.

        More:

        It Islam was that hostile to women for the last 1400 years it would never have survival at all.
        ………………………………

        This would only be true if Islam butchered *all* of its women—just the threat to do so and some examples keeps most of the women cowed and in line.

        As it is, Islam needs a constant influx of kidnapped Infidel women—just look at Nigeria, Pakistan, and the Islamic State.

        More:

        Mostly you have never live in than Islamist country at all.
        ………………………………

        Just on this one thread, Salah and Phil have. So have many other frequent posters, like Philip Jihadski and Istanbul Chick. And we often hear from figures such as a Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who grew up in Somalia and Saudi Arabia, and Simon Deng, who was enslaved in Sudan.

        Moreover, there is the constant stream of horror stories issuing from Dar-al-Islam.

        The idea that JIhad Watch readers have no understanding of the barbarism of Islam is simply false.

      • Golden Rule says

        Dec 7, 2014 at 3:57 am

        Brother Brian Hoff ( what a name!!! any real Brian Hoffs will surely die of shame if they visit Jihadwatch and read your drivel ) ,

        You are the biggest Islamophobe among those who post on this site. So much evidence is there that Islam, Muhammad and Allah are pure evil, that what stops people like you from apostating is pure Islamophobia. Not only do you suffer from Islamophobia, but also Muhammedophobia and Allahophobia.

        Any Muslim who reads about the IS and realises their evil, and still does not leave Islam is a sure victim of all three phobias.

    • Salah says

      Nov 30, 2014 at 8:21 pm

      So true, Wellington. Western academics are evil, they hate our culture and they’re poised to destroy it from within.
      As I always say, Our war against Islam must start here, at home, in our own backyards. Our PC governments, elites, academics, MSM, etc. are much more dangerous than Islam itself; they live in our midst, they speak our language and they look like us.
      Islam is a giant made of paper, it can be easily defeated were it not for them. I don’t know if they’re doing it for money, fame or simply out of wickedness, but they are definitely in bed with the enemy.
      Unfortunately, they are everywhere, in both parties.
      This is why I, personally, don’t count on any elections to save us from these scum. The whole system is corrupt and it has to go.
      Only the people can achieve this “clean-up.”

      • Americanaa says

        Nov 30, 2014 at 8:29 pm

        That’ll be the day when Western academics are being paid off en masse by Muslim entities outside the U.S. If nothing else, the new PRISM system should blow this out of the water without any question because that sort of funds transfer would be noted by one facet of the PRISM system or another. But let the kooky theories continue to abound…

        • gravenimage says

          Dec 4, 2014 at 12:00 am

          I see the egregious “Americanaa” is back—we had been blissfully free of her apologia for a while.

          Here she is pretending that any such payment would have to be under-the-table bribes, but this is false. Many “Islamic Studies” Departments, Chairs, and Institutions are openly funded by Muslim states, especially the Saudis.

          Of course, “political correctness” is a major factor in this phenomenon, as well.

          In just the same manner, it is impossible to know whether “Americanaa” herself is Muslim, or just a Leftist Muslim apologist.

      • Moa says

        Dec 2, 2014 at 12:17 am

        They are doing it because they have been indoctrinated to believe that the West is evil, thus they believe the evil they do is good.

        Check out Ion Mihai Pacepa’s book “Disinformation” and see where the “academics” get their memes from. Also take a look at ex-KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov’s warning about the indoctrination the Marxists work hard to spread in the West (and succeeded).

  5. sidney penny says

    Nov 30, 2014 at 6:03 pm

    I think that the Police Officer DCP Panjabrao Ugle was being political correct and offering some excuse for the behavior of the muslim,Mohammad Akil Malik.( You know this is often the case)

    One has to be drunk to express Islamic piety?

    The answer is no.

    Other wise Gauhar Khan could say to him “how could you be drinking despite being a Muslim and assaulting me when you are drunk,”

    Alcohol is haram for a Muslim.

  6. Ursula says

    Nov 30, 2014 at 6:28 pm

    Wow, Derby, you’re talking about low ‘interlect’ Inbreeds……… There are so many spelling and grammar mistakes in your impossible to understand rant that you might want to stay out of this discussion altogether for fear of exposing your inferior intellect.

  7. ernie says

    Nov 30, 2014 at 6:31 pm

    Mr. Malik might be a stalker , and actually think Mrs. Khan should be his girlfriend ( and fantasise a lot about her having intercourse with him ) . And not getting her in that position might have enraged this poor (excuse for a) man . His misguided sense of entitlement probably comes right out of the kor-an . His poor upbringing aswell .

  8. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Nov 30, 2014 at 6:33 pm

    Hasn’t the express and inherent misogyny in Islam been thoroughly reported and analyzed by the feminist crowd. I axe that question seriously. Hasn’t it? If not, maybe that’s cuz so many of them are professors. They cut their teef tearing into the Judeo-Christian white men who set womenkind free for the first time ever in world history, and stopped.

    • cs says

      Nov 30, 2014 at 6:52 pm

      I think there is a kind of masochism on their part, unfortunately.
      Poor muslims they are the victims. And this sort of crap.

      • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

        Nov 30, 2014 at 7:11 pm

        I think the feminists are mum on the Moslem Man cuz they skeert. Not so much skeert of being stabbed in the chest or having the car blow up when they turn the crank, skeert of what the University President would do if she published a paper criticizing Islam for its inherent misogyny.

        Or, there too stupid even to be aware of it.

    • Mark says

      Nov 30, 2014 at 9:21 pm

      “Axe”? “Teef”? LOL

      • gravenimage says

        Dec 4, 2014 at 12:07 am

        Alarmed Pig Farmer uses such phrasing quite deliberately, for satirical effect.

  9. Jaladhi says

    Nov 30, 2014 at 6:36 pm

    It’s the height of Muslim misogyny that even a lowly nobody Muslim scum feels entitled to keep Muslim women in line and attacks her in public!!

    Where are all those Muslim apologists here as well as in India to denounce this behavior – they are always spouting Islam respects women and gives them rights more than any other religion. Don’t they claim it was Mo who such respect right to women in Arabia. There is no end to Muslim lies and deceit!!

    • sidney penny says

      Nov 30, 2014 at 6:47 pm

      Wait for Obama to say this has nothing to do with Islam

      so why should “Muslim apologists here as well as in India to denounce this behavior”

  10. Zebo says

    Nov 30, 2014 at 7:03 pm

    Finally we found a super-mega-giga-tolerant muslim and all you western scum can do is complain and spread bad news about islam.

    This was just devotion the muslim way.

    This guy has shown so much tolerance,other muslims may try to kill him for aposthasy

    Instead of trying to kill her he just slapped her(there wasn’t even a knock down)
    Instead of blowing uo the studio(i guess he didn’t have the money to buy some TNT) he just ruined the show.

  11. duh_swami says

    Nov 30, 2014 at 8:20 pm

    It’s obvious she is warring with Allah, and must be stopped.

  12. Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says

    Nov 30, 2014 at 8:41 pm

    “Men are the managers of the affairs of women for that God has preferred in bounty one of them over another, and for that they have expended of their property. Righteous women are therefore obedient, guarding the secret for God’s guarding. And those you fear may be rebellious admonish; banish them to their couches, and beat them.” (Qur’an 4:34)

    Who the hell wrote this crap? It’s not that the content is bad; it’s that this is so poorly written that the reader cannot figure out what the writer is trying to say. This prose would be rejected in a junior-high-school English composition class. Let’s analyze it, sentence by sentence.

    “Men are the managers of the affairs of women for that God has preferred in bounty one of them over another, and for that they have expended of their property.”
    From context, the first “for that” seems to mean “because”, but is “for that” used in this sense in any part of the English-speaking world? What is the referent of the pronoun “them”? God has preferred one *what* over another *what*? In the second “for that”, what is the referent of “that”? For *what* have “they” expended of “their” (their own?) property, and who are these “they”, anyway?

    “Righteous women are therefore [therefore?] obedient, guarding the secret for God’s guarding.” Obedient to whom? To God? What is “the secret” that righteous women guard? And does “for God’s guarding” modify the verb “guarding”, or the noun “secret”? What does this “for” phrase even mean? That God can’t keep secrets without help? Sounds kind of heretical.

    “And those you fear may be rebellious admonish; banish them to their couches, and beat them.”
    Who is the “you” that is being addressed, and who is addressing this “you”? Those whom you fear may be rebellious (against you?). But wait, what’s the verb “admonish” doing there, and why the semicolon? Apparently, the “those” is the direct object of the verbs “admonish”, “banish”, and “beat”. The intent seems to be to say “Admonish, banish to their couches, and beat those who [not ‘whom’], in your fearful apprehension, might rebel against you.”

    Is this a problem of bad translation? Can someone knowledgeable in Quranic Arabic please verify whether the above questions are all answered in the original text? Or is the original text just as garbled as this translation?

    • El says

      Dec 1, 2014 at 1:31 pm

      This is the correct meaning “Men are in charge of women by [right of] what Allah has given one over the other and what they spend [for maintenance] from their wealth. So righteous women are devoutly obedient, guarding in [the husband’s] absence what Allah would have them guard. But those [wives] from whom you fear arrogance – [first] advise them; [then if they persist], forsake them in bed; and [finally], strike them. But if they obey you [once more], seek no means against them. Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand.”

  13. Semeru says

    Nov 30, 2014 at 10:34 pm

    And how Koran 4;34 have any thing to do with this case.

    Verse 34 tells men to beat their disobedient wives after first warning them and then sending them to sleep in separate beds. This is, of course, an extremely controversial verse, so it is worth noting how several translators render the key word here, وَاضْرِبُوهُنَّ, waidriboohunna.

    Robert Spencer. Blogging The Qur’an

    Gauhar Khan Mohammad Akil Malik where not even married

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 4, 2014 at 10:21 am

      Semeru wrote:

      And how Koran 4;34 have any thing to do with this case.

      Verse 34 tells men to beat their disobedient wives after first warning them and then sending them to sleep in separate beds. This is, of course, an extremely controversial verse, so it is worth noting how several translators render the key word here, وَاضْرِبُوهُنَّ, waidriboohunna.

      Robert Spencer. Blogging The Qur’an

      Gauhar Khan Mohammad Akil Malik where not even married
      ………………………..

      Qur’an 4:34 says quite a bit more than that:

      “Men are the managers of the affairs of women for that God has preferred in bounty one of them over another, and for that they have expended of their property. Righteous women are therefore obedient, guarding the secret for God’s guarding. And those you fear may be rebellious admonish; banish them to their couches, and beat them.”

      It condones wife-beating, certainly, but goes further.

      The first word here has never been translated specifically as “husbands”, but as “men”. And clearly Mohammad Akil Malik believed that Gauhar Khan was not properly “guarding the secret for God’s guarding” by wearing skimpy clothes and dancing to music.

      And there is, as Semeru knows, *long* precedence for this under Islam—fathers enforce “modesty” on daughters, as do brothers and other male relatives. Muslim clerics do, as well—note my quote from an Imam on beating 10-year-old girls who don’t wear Hijab. And in many parts of Dar-al-Islam—Iran, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan under the Taliban, the Islamic State—there are state Religious Police who enforce such norms.

      And there is, moreover, a very long tradition in Islam where if the state will not enforce Shari’ah norms, then individual members of the Ummah will. This includes not just enforcing “modesty”, but preventing drinking and murdering those suspected of “blasphemy”. There are “Muslim patrols” in heavily Islamic parts of Europe berating and assaulting unveiled women and anyone buying alcoholic beverages.

      Since India is not an Islamic state, what Mohammad Malik did was squarely within this grim Muslim tradition.

  14. BC says

    Dec 1, 2014 at 11:54 am

    As the American journalist, H L Mencken, had it: “God is the immemorial refuge of the incompetent, the helpless, the miserable. They find not only sanctuary in His arms, but also a kind of superiority, soothing to their macerated egos; He will set them above their betters.”
    With Muslims especially the males one can add the sexually frustrated. If Muslims were allowed to associate freely with each other as nature intends us to do, I am sure a lot of the anger and frustration would be dissipated. Plus the urge to get to paradise and the 72 virgins

  15. gravenimage says

    Dec 3, 2014 at 10:09 pm

    India: Muslim slaps actress for wearing skimpy outfits “despite being a Muslim”
    …………………………….

    As usual, the thuggish Ummah enforces its barbaric tenets. No Muslim can really be a private person—every other Mohammedan is constantly watching them.

    More:

    Officials said Malik had objected to the actor’s dress sense and for dancing to racy numbers. He also tried to touch her. He is likely to be booked on charges of molestation and assault…
    …………………………….

    Also very common. For an Infidel not paying much attention, they might believe that this is about modesty—but it is not. If a woman is deemed immodest, then she is fair game for molestation and rape. Raping an “immodest” woman is not, however, considered to be immodest in itself.

    And it is further proof that there is no privacy in Islam—if a woman does not dress the way a pious Muslim deems appropriate, then even her own body is not safe from him or any other Mohammedan male.

    More:

    We have sent him for a medical examination to find out if he was drunk,” said zonal DCP Panjabrao Ugle….
    …………………………….

    Another point—many Muslim apologists will tell you that a Muslim’s actions cannot be truly Islamic if he is drinking, since alcohol is forbidden in Islam. But this is violated by Muslims all the time—the specter of a possibly drunk Muslim railling against a woman’s immodesty is bizarre—but is not at all uncommon.

    In just the same way, Muslims who drink often wage violent Jihad against Infidels.

  16. Alberto says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 8:11 pm

    The worst thing that could ever happen to a woman is to be born and live in a muslim country. In those crazy fanatical societies the words woman and slave are synonyms. F***ing cowards!!!

  17. Ernesto Bedard says

    Dec 30, 2014 at 10:37 am

    Is clothing really one of the basis of the Muslim beliefs? But remember every living soul has its own will to decide what She or He really want.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Carol on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • James Lincoln on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Jayme on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • GreekEmpress on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Apathy Rules the World on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.