That should be no problem. Obama is good at bowing. “Iranian Negotiator: U.S. Must Bow to Our ‘Inalienable Nuclear Rights,’” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, November 12, 2014:
Iran’s foreign minister and lead negotiator in nuclear talks said this week that the United States must bow to Iran’s “inalienable nuclear rights” and hinted that Western countries are being fooled about the extent of concessions being made by Tehran in talks, according to regional media reports.
Despite Western media reports and indications from the Obama administration that Iran may be moderating its hardline position, there has been “no change in Iran’s rigid stance on its inalienable nuclear rights,” according to comments made Tuesday by Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif and reported in Iran’s state-controlled-media.
“Some [western] countries have fallen prey to miscalculations [about Iran’s position] due to wrong analyses,” Zarif was quoted as saying on the heels of another round of talks with the United States and other Western countries ahead of the Nov. 24 deadline.
U.S. sanctions against Iran “have left no impact” on Iran’s desire to “possess the civilian nuclear technology,” Iran’s Fars News Agency reported Zarif as saying. The foreign minister also framed the controversy over Iran’s nuclear weapons program as a “manufactured crisis.”
Zarif’s comments highlight the gaps that remain between Tehran and the West as negotiations approach their deadline. As Iran digs in over the right to enrich uranium, the key fuel in a nuclear bomb, the Obama administration has indicated that it may be willing to accede to this demand.
Leading congressional opponents of a deal that permits Iran to continue enriching uranium said on Wednesday that Congress will pass new sanctions if the Obama administration concedes to this demand from Tehran.
“As co-authors of bipartisan sanctions laws that compelled Iran to the negotiating table, we believe that a good deal will dismantle, not just stall, Iran’s illicit nuclear program and prevent Iran from ever becoming a threshold nuclear weapons state,” Sens. Mark Kirk (R., Ill.) and Robert Menendez (D., N.J.) said in a joint statement….
Yes, but we’re unlikely to get that from this Administration.
Jay Boo says
Why didn’t President Obama just give him a friendly hug like Michele Obama did with the elderly Queen of Great Britain to convey their chummy familiarity?
He did not need to go out of his way to display his subservient attitude toward Islam that was already well known.
David says
The more I look at this picture the less I believe that he was actually bowing. I have little regard for this current occupant of the highest position in the US and supposed leader of the free world, but let’s be realistic. Look at the eyes of those surrounding (H)him and where they are looking. Either (H)he is showing them his newest decoder ring, or naughty pictures of Michelle. It is probably the former, though, otherwise they would be recoiling in horror.
Salah says
“…naughty pictures of Michelle…”???
or of…Stanley!!
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/08/obamas-momla-mere-dobama.html
Jay Boo says
Excellent point!
David
The photo does not due justice to the bow.
See for yourself with link below or a Google search
Rob Porter says
David, Why do you conclude he was not actually bowing? In fact Obama was kissing the ring on the finger of this scumbag Muslim King. If this wasn’t a bow, what was his barely perceptible bow to the Queen of England.
ninetyninepct says
Bowing any lower would have put akbar close to the area of oral sex.
Bamaguje says
Mullah Iran’s intransigence is no surprise since Obama has take military action off the table… although he publicly claims otherwise.
Negotiations can only work if backed up by credible threat of force… And the Mullahs know Obama wouldn’t go there.
jewdog says
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all Muslims were created superior to infidels, having been endowed by Allah with the right to nuclear weapons…
Atikva says
Mr. Obama may bow to all and sundry, but the American people is not in the mood.
Roy Crocker says
Does anyone care to fast forward 3 or 4 years when Israel is decimated by a nuclear strike and wonder what the response of the West will be? What if the evil little dwarf finally decides to vaporize Seoul? Iran will use a terrorist proxy to deliver the attack leaving Israel in a terrible position of suffering the wrath of the entire world when it strikes back as it must do. The West will weep for Iran’s dead while believing the mullahs claims of innocence. You don’t believe this? Our Messiah clearly believes (or pretends to) that Iran really wants to work with us to develop peaceful nuclear power. So corrupt is our media that when Iran announces it has become a nuclear power Obama will be lionized for his heroic efforts in dealing with the Mullahs. “He did what he could” will be the mantra instead of ‘he did everything he could to facilitate Iran’s nuclear weapons program”. The nuclear genie has been contained for nearly 70 years now. It will soon be freed.