Islam preaches hatred and violence against women in the same way that some warring countries demonize the enemy among their own population in order to break down psychological barriers that naturally block the willingness to harm beings from one’s own species (above: excerpt from the Quran, sura 34, verse 4, that orders husbands to beat disobedient wives). More on the psychological consequences of Islam’s views on women here. Translated by Nicolai Sennels for 10News:
Close relatives of the 29-year-old Eritrean-woman yesterday afternoon heard their relative’s terrifying screams through the phone before she was burned beyond recognition. The woman had not died after an attempted strangling, but was thereafter burnt while alive and breathing, in a bathroom. The perpetrator set fire to flammable liquid he had poured over her.
The horrific details come from a female source, who for years has known both the murdered woman and her two-years-younger husband of Iraqi descent, who has now been charged with murder.
Jay Boo says
Those pesky Muslims who refuse to beat their wives risk put the fragile honor of Allah into much jeopardy and put into question the very teachings of Muhammad.
Love is an insult to Muhammad and Allah.
Islam is an insult to human decency.
Elsie says
ISLAM IS AN INSULT TO THE WORLD, IT NEEDS TO BE ERADICATED TO PRESERVE HUMAN KIND.
Ariel says
Sooner the better!
shosh7154 says
EZEKIEL 38 IS THE END OF ISLAM….IT WILL BURN ON THE MOUNTAINS OF ISRAEL…THE GOLAN HEIGHTS….VERSE 23 SAYS:
Ezekiel 38:23 Thus will I magnify myself, and sanctify myself; and I will be known in the eyes of many nations, and they shall know that I am the LORD.
The word LORD is yud hey vav hey….the Supreme Name of G-d….no one is going to call on that retched name of allah anymore after all those nations learn the real name of G-d, the G-d of Avraham, Itzchak and Yaacov.
FOREVER !
Jaladhi says
Europe, UK, USA, and western nations will never admit their mistake in allowinh Muslim immigration to their countries after all they sufffer from the guilt complex of colonialism. Until this fake an d dubious guilt complex is removedthings will continue getting worse. Instead of uplifting these scumbags, we will come down to their level!!
Zebo says
I am pretty sure low education was the reason for strangeling her
and poverty was the reason for burning her.
Don’t believe me?Just ask the pope!
100%Pure islamic peace and love killed her.(and allah was pleased by another human sacrifice!)
Keith says
I must admit I had not thought about allah and human sacrifice but now you mention it he does seem to like a lot of human sacrifices. The Aztecs would be jealous.
Thank you for pointing this out.
Dennis says
Islam demands blood sacrifice. The turning point was when Abraham was told by God not to sacrifice his son. He sent Jesus to be the sacrifice for all our sins. Mohammed did not get this message.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
I have brought up this point before, but it is more appropriate here.
Quran 4:34 says, in one translation:
“Men are the managers of the affairs of women for that God has preferred in
bounty one of them over another, and for that they have expended of their
property. Righteous women are therefore obedient, guarding the secret for
God’s guarding. And those you fear may be rebellious admonish; banish them
to their couches, and beat them.”
Who the hell wrote this crap? It’s not that the content is bad; it’s that
this is so poorly written that the reader cannot figure out what the writer
is trying to say. This prose would be rejected in a junior-high-school
English composition class. Let’s analyze it, sentence by sentence.
“Men are the managers of the affairs of women for that God has preferred in
bounty one of them over another, and for that they have expended of their
property.”
From context, the first “for that” seems to mean “because”, but is “for
that” used in this sense in any part of the English-speaking world? What is
the referent of the pronoun “them”? God has preferred one *what* over
another *what*? In the second “for that”, what is the referent of “that”?
For *what* have “they” expended of “their” (their own?) property, and who
are these “they”, anyway?
“Righteous women are therefore [therefore?] obedient, guarding the secret
for God’s guarding.” Obedient to whom? To God? What is “the secret” that
righteous women guard? And does “for God’s guarding” modify the verb
“guarding”, or the noun “secret”? What does this “for” phrase even mean?
That God can’t keep secrets without help? Sounds kind of heretical.
“And those you fear may be rebellious admonish; banish them to their
couches, and beat them.”
Who is the “you” that is being addressed, and who is addressing this “you”?
Those whom you fear may be rebellious (against you?). But wait, what’s the
verb “admonish” doing there, and why the semicolon? Apparently, the “those”
is the direct object of the verbs “admonish”, “banish”, and “beat”. The
intent seems to be to say “Admonish, banish to their couches, and beat those
who [not ‘whom’], in your fearful apprehension, might rebel against you.”
Is this a problem of bad translation? Can someone knowledgeable in Quranic
Arabic please verify whether the above questions are all answered in the
original text? Or is the original text just as garbled as this translation?
Similar remarks apply to the other most famous (among infidels) Quran passage, Q9:29, whose conjunctions (“nor”, “and”) require jizya only from a certain subset of atheists, from whom people of the book, being theists, are exempted. Again, is this just a bad translation?
(Side remark: A lot of these ayat have a non-sequitur illeistic sentence of self-praise tacked onto the end. Here, what does “Indeed, Allah is ever Exalted and Grand” have to do with the subject-matter of Q4:34?)
Islamisdeath says
I have often thought it sounds as though written by an illiterate imbecile.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
And you were right when you thought that!
Michael Copeland says
“About a fifth of Koranic passages make no sense at all”, German scholar, Gerd-R. Puin (http://www.allaboutmuhammad.com/the-koran.html). To make matters worse, the Koran has been given translations which are deliberately opaque and difficult: the translators did not wish to admit too clearly to its unpalatable meaning.
Your proposed translation makes that verse understood.
It is worth pointing out that the go-ahead for wife-beating is not, as many wrongly claim, disobedience on her part. She could be entirely and wonderfully obedient. The deciding factor is if the husband should FEAR disobedience from her. As can be appreciated, he can always claim that he did fear it, whatever her behaviour.
Islam_Macht_Frei says
The report is based on a sole “female” source? Obviously unreliable therefore. She needs to find another to confirm her story, in case she “forgot.” Or better yet, a reliable male Muslim “witness,” who no doubt will assure us that the poor dear “committed suicide.”
voegelinian says
The little editorial elucidation Nicolai Sennels provides —
Islam preaches hatred and violence against women in the same way that some warring countries demonize the enemy among their own population in order to break down psychological barriers that naturally block the willingness to harm beings from one’s own species
— seems to reflect a bit of a PC MC spasm, utterly bereft of the remarkable ethical progress the West has achieved in modern times (not to mention grounded in the Judaeo-Christian worldview that preceded the modern era, even if not as ethically refined as it could have been while it was on its long epochal adventure of working out its nherent, internal dynamic of progress). Indeed, the modern West has progressed so far, it irrationally wrings its hands at non-existent propensities (“racism”, “bigotry against the Other”, “xenophobia”) and bends over backwards — monstrously too far — to develop a COIN modus operandi in the way it prosecutes its “war” in Iraq and Afghanistan that is the grotesque opposite of Sennels’ PC MC spasm.
gravenimage says
Denmark: Muslim fails to strangle wife to death, burns her alive
…………………………….
How many more bloody “Honor Killings” will there be in the West with the skyrocketing Muslim population here?
God, I hate Islam.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
Now it is too cruel to criticize this poor man. I mean: He has to do this. It’s his religion.
Anyway don’t we Americans much admire the maxim, ‘If first you don’t succeed, try, try again?’.
Now all of you stop being so ISLAMOPHOBIC and learn to admire the many many wonderful things about Islam. Even tho’ there are none.
clifford hall says
TH
Yes, you are wrong but no matter.
Philip demands you retract. The Inquisition has spoken. Remain silent at your peril. You may become a “leftie”.
gp says
What a vile and barbaric religion these monsters follow, the Koran with its satanic verses commands them to violence, hatred, rape, murder, genocide and mayhem. Their God the devil, the Father of Lies rejoices! The opposite of the Ten Commandments the opposite of all that is good and decent.
ISIS is ISLAM, the “Religion of Peace”, don’t you know?
Picolino says
Muslims are the first victims of Islam. Many times I have observed in my travels in the Orient,
that fanaticism comes from a small number of dangerous men who maintain the others in the
practice of religion by terror. To liberate the Muslim from his religion is the best service that
one can render him. — Joseph Ernest Renan
Islam is nothing more nor less than Judaism plus the apostle-ship of Mohammed. — Samuel
Marinus Zwemer
Islam, this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives.
— Mustafa Kemal Atat
PatnCats says
We never noticed – and we ignored – the mohammadans until Sept 11, 2001 – when ISLAM hit us hard – then the Boston Marathon bombing after Ft Hood massacre in the name of islam -just to let us know that the terror – just like MOHAMMED DID. One mohammadan at a time, beheading, raping, murdering to spread terror to us that We MUST OBEY the barbarian MOHAM.
AND who now commands MOHAM’s orders?
The nearest jihadist.
And how near are these jihadist?
Coming to your neighborhood?
Already there?
Got any no-go zones?