According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general, as does this passage. “Certainly will the believers have succeeded: They who are during their prayer humbly submissive, and they who turn away from ill speech, and they who are observant of zakah, and they who guard their private parts except from their wives or those their right hands possess, for indeed, they will not be blamed” (Qur’an 23:1-6).
The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Muslim 3371)
Notice that the controversy is not over whether the Muslims can rape the captives but only over coitus interruptus. The rape is taken for granted.
These passages have not gone unnoticed. The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:
Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.
When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.
Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.
A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”
The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”
“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.
“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”
These beliefs are Qur’an-based. Until that is acknowledged, this practice will not end.
“Asian father-of-four raped pub worker for three hours after dragging her off the street saying ‘you white women are good at it,'” by Gemma Mullin, Daily Mail, December 21, 2014 (thanks to Thoughtful):
An Asian father-of-four dragged a young pub worker off the street and raped her for three hours saying ‘you white women are good at it’.
The woman, who is in her 20s, was walking home from work in Bedford at around 11pm when she was grabbed by Abdul Ghafoor, 33, and forced her into undergrowth, a court heard.
Ghafoor had drunk five rum drinks when he came up behind her and bundled her into the bushes where he began sexually assaulting her in an attack that lasted from 11.25pm until 2.45am.
The victim had sent a WhatsApp message to her sister when she left work on May 30 this year to say she was walking to their flat.
But the married father-of-four, who had earlier propositioned two other white woman, demanded that the woman perform a sex act on him saying ‘you white girls are good at it’.
She was able to send a second message to her sister saying ‘help me’ before he smashed her phone.
At one point she managed to make a run for it when Ghafoor vomited as a result of the alcoholic drinks he had downed, but he caught her and took her back into the undergrowth.
Her sister had raised the alarm and the victim heard the police helicopter overhead as a major search was launched to find her.
Eventually Ghafoor allowed her to get dressed and walked out on to the the road with her saying she should accompany him into town, but they were seen by police inspector, Jamie Longwith.
She got into the officer’s car while Ghafoor made an attempt to escape but was caught….
Jay Boo says
Islam pig bath
Allah Alibi
Muhammad without a trace of honor
Angemon says
Asian, eh? Was he Indian, Pakistani, Chinese, Malaysian, Japanese, Korean, Mongol, Indonesian, East-Timorese, Armenian, Lebanese, Israeli, Turk… you get my point.
The racial reference reminds me of the Sydney rape gang, who told their victims they “deserved it because” they were “Australian”, and that they were going to be “f***ed Leb[anese] style”.
celticwarriorcanada says
Another Effeminate Muslim Male loser with a half inch dong . His wife obviously laughed at it and made fun of him so he took it out on another women and justified it with the Koran . Only incompetent losers rape woman !
Salah says
You’ve just described a seventh century sexually impotent bedouin named Muhammad!!!
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2011/01/prophetess-of-islam.html
George Romero says
Yes muslim arab and indian men have very small penis size compared to
whitet euro and african men , wonder why they soooo angry?
Nicu says
Let’s see what happens if somebody dares to pull on a HIjab , only ?
Our women are not safe for decades and their women even walk alone in here feeling so superior …. yet
eddie tibbor says
The sad fact is he’d probably get more time than the rapist,
Richie says
Remember, in Islamic culture, men who rape are the victims
Arthur says
If, under Sharia law, a man steals something, they cut off his hand. So if he rapes a woman, what do they cut off? The woman’s head, of course.
somehistory says
The fact that he is *father* of four is more important than that he is muslim. And of course, he only acted out due to having drunk enough to make him vomit.
Sorry excuse for a human….we can feel sorry for the *children* of this rapist.
Know Thy Enemy says
The children are in good hands….. the mullahs’ hands that is! No prizes for guessing what they are going to grow up to be.
Know Thy Enemy says
The non-Muslim Asians are becoming unhappy! …..So? Both the MSM and the Govt know that they have nothing to fear from non-Muslim Asians! People who cause no harm to the Govt and MSM can be safely ignored, no matter how unhappy they are! Hence, status quo will be maintained in UK.
Charli Main says
I have seen no evidence of non Muslim Asians becoming unhappy.
The British MSM constantly blames Asians for Muslim rapes, murders, child abuse, forced marriages, benefits fraud and EVERY criminal activity permitted by Sharia Law, but I have NEVER seen any Hindus, Sikhs, Chinese et al out on the streets waving banners ” stop blaming us for Muslim criminality”. Silence is acquiescence. Time to start suing the BBC and National Press. Hit them in their pockets until they scream.
Know Thy Enemy says
Drunk on five rum drinks!! Now everyone from the Govt, MSM, Muslim leaders, and other useful idiots will tell the world how the man was a very bad Muslim, and how Islam completely prohibits consumption of alcohol. They will tell you that if Ghafoor had obeyed the Quran’s prohibition on alcohol, the rape would never have happened!
If anyone plans to fall for this propaganda, I strongly suggest that you do the following experiment first- Find a very bad Muslim who openly flouts the Quran’s prohibition on alcohol, have him consume five rum drinks, and then….. ask him to admit that there really exist a God other than Allah, or ask him to admit that Allah has partners equal in status to Him, or ask him to admit that Muhammad was *not* a messenger of Allah. (Admitting to any of these is called Shirk, the one and only sin/crime that Allah will not forgive. And EVERY Muslim knows this.)
Try this experiment with ten different bad Muslims if you desire, and let me know if you were able to make even a single one of them to admit to any of the above. If you were, then go ahead and believe the Islam-apologists without worry!
And if you were NOT, then remember that consumption of alcohol in no way dictates someone’s Muslimness!! It is ONLY IF the person commits Shirk, his Muslimness may be questioned!
Mahmoud says
True, but it shows that he hardly takes the Qur^an’s commands that seriously. So whether or not the Qur’an justifies rape is irrelevant to this case.
Know Thy Enemy says
Is the prohibition on Shirk not a Quranic command? What Muslim in the world does not take it seriously? The difference between Quranic command to not drink alcohol and to not commit Shirk is that the one regarding Shirk *really* matters! No Muslim would disobey this command no matter how drunk he is and no matter how non-seriously he takes the other commands.
The lust for sex is a male’s biological instinct. Religions either instruct their male followers to curb sexual lust (towards ALL women, not just women of same faith) or they teach men to see others (including women) as equal and practice the Golden Rule with them. Atheists too primarily see everyone as equal and practice the Golden Rule.
Islam is the only ‘religion’ that not only does not teach any form of Golden Rule, but 1) teaches followers that they are superior to others, 2) that non-Muslims are so inferior that Muslims should treat them as dirt, 3) that women are nothing better than chattel and child producing machines, 4) that non-Muslim women are nothing better than sex-objects made by Allah for Muslims to quench their lust, and other such ugly things.
With these kinds of teachings, how are men to know that they need to control themselves? In fact, such ugly teachings not only encourage the male base/animal desires but actually justify rape.
If some Muslim man turns out to be a decent gentleman, it is not because of Islam but *despite* Islam.
And if he turns out to be like Ghafoor, then he would rape whether or not he takes Islam seriously. In fact if he takes Islam seriously, he would rape without any guilt!
At JW, we don’t oppose Islam simply because the rapist happened to be of a certain faith, but because this faith (Islam) actually justifies rape!
Know Thy Enemy says
@Mahmoud,
Here is another response to your comment-
The two facts that 1) Islam justifies rape of non-Muslim women, and 2) Ghafoor is a Muslim, are both relevant! It doesn’t matter whether Ghafoor is a bad Muslim or good Muslim.
Hence your attempt to somehow absolve Islam from Ghafoor’s crimes will not succeed here!
zhivago.ks says
He has displayed the qualities of his cult founder Mohammad. To rape and kill.
george whyte says
Racist Muslim Girls on London Train
cs says
A waste of taxpayer’s money, should be thrown to the lions, and this fucker managed to produce 4 little mohammedians, just hope they don’t follow the footsteps of the father.
Could deport the whole family.
Allen says
Filthy moslem violence AGAIN perpetrated upon an innocent citizen unfortunate enough to live in a state disarmed by its government.
BC says
To play devil’s advocate for a moment. He is obviously not a true Muslims as he drinks alcohol. So it is difficult to blame this on Islam except that Muslims claim to be so morally superior to the rest of us infidels.
Humph says
No, I’ve known loads of ‘muslims’ who drink alcohol and lived in 2 Gulf Arabian countries where anywhere between 50-75% of muslims drank. He’s just a normal muslim.
Know Thy Enemy says
Apparently you are one of those who have already fallen for the propaganda, that if a Muslim drinks he is not a true Muslim.
BTW did you do the experiment that I talked about in the other comment in the current thread?
wallace says
OH dear, what an intolerant country I now live in. We have invited these nice people in , and now when they are merely following their base instincts we want to give them a hard time. Well maybe there might be a few of us left who hold different views, I for one would will gladly separate the heads of any of those bearded inbreds who touched any my family. Camoran you are a traitor, away and fall on your sword
Mahmoud says
“Ghafoor had drunk five rum drinks when he came up behind her and bundled her into the bushes where he began sexually assaulting her in an attack that lasted from 11.25pm until 2.45am.”
Yet there is wide agreement among muslims that the Qur’an forbids alcohol consumption.
“These beliefs are Qur’an-based. Until that is acknowledged, this practice will not end.”
This does not add up. He gets drunk, which is forbidden by the Qur’an, yet rapes a woman because of the Qur’an.
Robert, are you just a demagogue who couldn’t care less about the truth?
Angemon says
Mahmoud posted:
“Yet there is wide agreement among muslims that the Qur’an forbids alcohol consumption.
(…)
He gets drunk, which is forbidden by the Qur’an”
Which is it? Is there wide agreement or is it forbidden?
MukeNecca says
”This does not add up. He gets drunk, which is forbidden by the Qur’an, yet rapes a woman because of the Qur’an.”
So what exactly “doesn’t add up”? Where is the contradiction?
Nothing the muhammedan pig did to a kafir girl is forbidden by the kuran, you lying muhammedan creep. On the contrary, as the muhammedan raping pigs all over the civilized world know and universally use in their defense when apprehended, kuran not only doesn’t prohibit the rape of the infidel woman, but explicitly allows it and implicitly recommends it.
Your revolting “prophet” Muhammed raped women constantly, even women whose husband he had personally decapitated an hour before. Now, doesn’t your “religion” command you to emulate that sadistic pervert?
Doesn’t it say explicitly: “Thou must strive to be an evil pig like your beloved prophet mohammed was”?
Not explicitly? OK then, implicitly.
”Robert, are you just a demagogue who couldn’t care less about the truth?”
Asks a muhammedan lying hypocrite. What gall, what stupidity. How Islamic.
Mahmoud says
So Angemon decides to pick on an irrelevant semantic detail, while MukeNecca completely ignores my point. I did not claim the Qur’an forbids rape. I claimed it forbids alcohol consumption, which he did. So whether or not the Qur’an forbids or encourage rape doesn’t matter in this case, because this man clearly doesn’t care what the Qur’an commands.
Your replies only further validates my belief that you’re not truthseekers, but only interested in whatever filth you can throw at islam and muslims.
MukeNecca says
” I did not claim the Qur’an forbids rape. I claimed it forbids alcohol consumption, which he did. So whether or not the Qur’an forbids or encourage rape doesn’t matter in this case, because this man clearly doesn’t care what the Qur’an commands..”
Oh boy…
Who gives rat as* if kuran forbids alcohol consumption? It also forbids pork consumption, so bloody what? Whose problem is that? The kafir’s or muhammedan?
“…because this man clearly doesn’t care what the Qur’an commands…”
Oh yes , he does. Quran allows rape of infidel women while your rotten “prophet” practiced it everywhere. What is relevant is that kuran doesn’t forbid rape, as you yourself acknowledge and the “asian father of four” availed himself of that permission.Once again, where is the contradiction? That the sadistic pervert “prophet” raped when sober, while the “asian father of four” when drunk? Does that make his crime any less Islamic? But the overwhelming majority of muhammedan rapes of the “infidel” are committed by muhammedans who never touch alcohol. Or good muhammedans.
Good because they don’t drink and good because they rape. Doubly “good”.That’s the corner into which your islamic reasoning and Islamic “honesty” makes you paint yourself.
“Your replies only further validates my belief that you’re not truthseekers, but only interested in whatever filth you can throw at islam and muslims.”
How can one “throw filth” on something as infinitely rotten, degenerated and filthy as islam? Does calling sh*t a sh*t make it more filthy?
Angemon says
Mahmud posted:
“So Angemon decides to pick on an irrelevant semantic detail”
It’s neither irrelevant nor a semantic detail. If the quran doesn’t forbid it then you can’t say that what the quran says about rape doesn’t matter because the man he drank alcohol and therefore doesn’t care about the quran. He could very well be a part of those muslims who don’t agree on that the quran forbids it.
Even if the quran does forbid consuming alcohol, your logic doesn’t hold up to scrutiny: there’s a wide spectrum of belief, and he could disregard what the quran says about alcohol while regarding what the quran says about rape.
“Your replies only further validates my belief that you’re not truthseekers”
As opposed to what, assuming that what the quran says about rape didn’t influence his actions, like you did?
BlueRaven says
The British media is sick to the core lumping all the Asians with the vile Pakistani Muslims who commit the largest number of rapes in the history in any country. I don’t understand why don’t the non-Muslim Asians go on riot till this type of name calling nonsense is stopped.
martinR says
“…I don’t understand why don’t the non-Muslim Asians go on riot…”
Fear!
Fear of the British Police
Fear of Muslims
Fear of being mistaken for a Muslim
David says
Right now they are winning through government and media complicity. Until “Asians” is replaced with ‘muslims,” and immigration, no-go zones, polygamy, and all the other concessions made to muslims and ended, they will continue to win.
Ken says
Time for the English men to man up, arm yourselves and get into this unholy war that the muslims are waging against you. Defend your women and children!!!!!
Why is this even being talked about?
clifford hall says
Mahmoud
Pay them no mind.
A married man who may or may not be a Moslem rapes a girt. He makes no reference to the Koran. If he is a Moslem, he seems to be a secular Moslem or a weak-willed Moslem. His reason for raping the girl is that he supposes white women are good at it.
This story is rooted in conjecture. Does someone have the figures for the number of baptised, white, British males presently residing in HMP Here or There after a conviction for rape?
BlueRaven says
I guess you don’t read the news. Why don’t you collect your own statistics? The W-Governments don’t allow the real figures to be published for an obvious reason- the Muslims are protected. What makes you think he is a weak willed Muslim, because he was drinking? What a crock you are. I guess you ignored his statement – “‘you white girls are good at it’.” He was a weak willed Muslim, right you are. I wonder what a strong willed Muslim would have done in your opinion. Care to tell us?
Ayattollahowmany says
” If he is a Moslem, he seems to be a secular Moslem or a weak-willed Moslem”
OH, I SEE… were he a devout muslim he would know full well that rape of the kuffar is permitted by Islam.
You are SO right!
Wallace says
Cliff, nip round and get Mahmud, see if you can fashion a flotation device out of some goatskins, get your boney arses down to Dover, Bon Voyage, better still see if you can organise a flotilla
Ravi says
There are so many such incidents happening across the globe, muslims are increasing their population and spreading like viruses. I am sure that they will pay for what they are doing and that has already started. they would kill among themselves as has happened in Iraq.
GKP says
Islam is the greatest myth of the world and the its ideology of life in heaven with 72 vergin girls for Muslims is the greatest lies ever existing on earth. Women’s are toys to satisfy sexual pleasure and child producing machine in Islam .What a barbaric idea.
Matt says
Everything they do is ok!!! The lot of you Britons and Europeans, and misled xenophilia!!!!!