Speaking about dolls with faces, the creator of this creepy, dehumanizing, anti-woman product says, “Some parents won’t leave the doll with their children at night because you are not allowed to have any eyes in the room.”
Which is creepier — to be alone at night in a room with a doll with a face, or alone at night in a room with a doll with no face?
Islamic misogyny in Subjugated Britannia: “New ‘Islamic doll’ launched in Britain has no facial features,” Asian Image, December 11, 2014 (thanks to ECAW):
A new ‘Islamic doll’ with no facial features has been launched in Britain.
The ‘Deeni Doll’ has no eyes, nose or mouth whatsoever in a bid to comply with Islamic rules governing the depiction of faces.
The doll was manufactured in China and designed in the UK by Ridhwana B. She told us: “I came up with the idea from scratch after speaking to some parents who were a little concerned about dolls with facial features.
“Some parents won’t leave the doll with their children at night because you are not allowed to have any eyes in the room.
“There is an Islamic ruling which forbids the depiction of facial features of any kind and that includes pictures, sculptures and, in this case, dolls.
“I spoke to a religious scholar in Leicester who guided me through what was and what was not permissible when producing the product.
“The Deeni Doll has no face on it whatsoever and is Shariah compliant.”…
Zoltar says
Good Lord, it’s an Auton.
cs says
Just to post once more, SCARY SHIT!!
Zebo says
That”s really creepy and will have a negative impact on childrens mind and islam never fails do ricicule itself.
but maybe it”ll also have a positive effect(from a muslim point of view).
Declaring those dolls as kafurs should help to lower the empathy towards non-muslim victims.
Than you are not just an unbeliever but even faceless.
Should make the bodycount much much easier.
Charli Main says
There is obviously no limit to the insanity of Islam. How can any sane person believe the utter rubbish that constitutes the tenets of Islam. ????
Oooops——I do believe that I have answered my own question.
jayell says
Is this sick, or is this sick?
Tamara says
That is one of the creepiest things I’ve ever seen.
Twostellas says
And the first thing a little girl will want to do is to draw a face in the doll, then what? Blasphemy punishment? Smh.
Grump says
Okay, so here’s jihadi Barbie, now someone needs to make jihadi Ken… who should be dressed in filthy pajamas and wearing a giant hate beard. Jihadi Ken comes complete with tiny toy guns and rocket launchers that say, ‘stolen from US military aid’ on the side, and come with prisoners they can behead. Both jihadi Barbie and jihadi Ken will smell like goat… but jihadi Ken will smell like the back end of the goat. “A woman for duty, a boy for pleasure, but a goat for ecstasy,” –Turkish proverb.
The merchandizing opportunities for this doll line are endless. Tiny scary black Islamic State flags, rusty scissors to mutilate the woman’s genitals, sharp knives for beheading the prisoners, plush rocks for stoning the women for adultery.
When you pull a string on the jihadi Ken doll, it can say, ‘Allahu Akbar!’. When you pull the string on the jihadi Barbie doll, it can say… nothing– under Shariah, women have no voice. Ha ha ha!
deja vu says
This could be a winner.
One suggestion: JihadiBarbie should be heavily pregnant and surrounded by collectable children aged 9 months, 18 months, 27months, 3 years, etc. I suggest they should all come with a string. From birth the babies should be able to recite the Qur’an, and by 2 the girls should be able to answer questions fired at them from JihadiKen without flinching. By 3 they should be able to recite the Qur’an. Any child owning these dolls would be able to absorb the teachings of Islam subliminally. What a selling point!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zb3ttHCrBMA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t64ULEbA-Uw
cs says
Ok,I will steal your idea, and I will surely make the video, you bet on it, may take one year, but it will be a HELL OF AN ART PROJECT MAN.
you are a genius.
Angemon says
Too bad islam discourages critical thinking. One of the parents might have made a bit of money if he/she started selling burkas for dolls, even if they were just made of a garbage bag and duct tape.
zebo says
Too bad that dolls which can close their eyes as soon as they are laid on the back already exist for 50+ years.(+ a piece of round canvas or plastic that looks like an eye is still canvas or plastic and not an eye+ they believe that a childraping massmurder is the best human being ever,but some artificial eyes are evil???)
Seems to me that there exists some secret head-to-head race between muslims and liberals to show the world who can come up with the biggest perversion while pretending everything is fine and normal.
katarzyna says
“Aïcha, Aïcha, regarde-moi”
Salah says
I love this french song. I think the singer’s name is Khaled.
Here’s another beautiful french song by Perret: Quand la Femme est Grillagée (the Fenced Woman.)
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/11/quand-la-femme-est-grillagee-pierre.html
name says
Faceless? So much easier to be deceptive. Religion all over. What a horrid world we have created.
exsgtbrown says
well you could stuff a black sock and sell it as the Muslim burkah doll….
zebo says
We all have muslim burqua dolls all the time and didn’t knew it?
John says
While they look bizarre, iconoclasm has a lengthy biblical justification. Romans 1:21-23 just echoes many of the prophets of the old testament. The belief is that images (idols) should not be created because humans so easily slip into veneration of those images, especially children if you’ve ever watched a child play with a doll and imbue it with personality. Orthodox and Protestant reformers have confined themselves to religious images, but Islamic iconoclasts have often prohibited all images (idols). One can understand if they’ve ever been in a home or office with a picture of a beloved president or ancestor, or seen pictures of the use of image by Stalin or Mao. People are naturally drawn to talk to these pictures or give them reverence, imbue them with power. Then think further of the role and attention given to images in our culture in magazines, television and the internet.
voegelinian says
Long before 911 when I took comparative religion classes in college for a major in same, I learned that scholars of the Patristic period conjecture (with evidence, of course) that the Iconoclastic episode of the 8th and 9th centuries (when certain Christians of the Eastern Empire began condemning the use of icons which had been in use for centuries to that point) was influenced by the rise of Islam. What was a vague connection posited way back when in my studies became clearer in my post-911 Awakening and I put two and two together: The Iconoclastic Christians were likely heavily infuenced by dhimmitude.
Jay Boo says
Parents giving their child a doll with no face is not nearly as creepy as indoctrinating them into a religion that has no soul.
Angemon says
True that.
najis_kafir says
If the problem is with a depiction of eyes on the face, why not a doll with the eyes gouged out in accordance with islamic barbarism?
voegelinian says
In fact, a frequent Muslim commenter on Jihad Watch from a couple of years ago proposed something similar. Some JW veterans may remember a guy who called himself “D”. In a comment he wrote expanding on some blather about Aisha playing with dolls, he then talked about dolls, and mentioned the Islamic prohibition on dolls having recognizable features — not merely eyes, but a face, and even too much of a body. He cited a hadith that recommended that if a Muslim has a doll, they use fire to “soften” it up so they can “press” out the features. This “D” character also recommended beheading the doll. Here’s his post:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/08/egyptian-muslim-brotherhood-cleric-the-day-will-come-when-we-will-be-masters-of-the-world/comment-page-0#comment-899599
And here was my commentary on it at the time (under my previous nickname, “LemonLime”):
D’s discursus on dolls put me in mind of a couple of ideas:
For people below puberty, they can play with dolls which have a face. For post pubertal people, the[y] can play only with those dolls which do not have faces.
And not just the face matters, apparently:
“With regard to those in which the shape is incomplete, in which there is only a part of the limbs or head, but the shape is not clear, there is no doubt that these are permissible… (Narrated in al-Bukhaari, 6130; Muslim, 2440).
Why is this important? Because, without faces and/or without recognizably zoological formation, …they were not considered to be idols.
“D” fleshes (pun intended) this out with his Muslim opinion:
But if the shape is complete, and it is as if you are looking at a person – especially if it can move or speak – then I am not entirely at ease with the idea of them being permissible, because this is a complete imitation of the creation of Allaah.
I’ve already been familiar with this idea of Islam forbidding idol-worship and images of living creatures; what interests me more here are a couple of things revealed in between the lines. For now, I’ll just allude to these things for which I do not currently have links to sources that may verify whatever claims may be implied in my presentation.
1. A fairly common idea in ancient Gnosticism, also preserved (critically, not supportively) in medieval Rabbinic mythological speculation: the Satan figure (whether named or not) is also a “Demiurge” who competes with the true God by attempting to create living things which, because he’s not God and does not have creative power, turn out to be half-formed, stunted, zombie-like creatures (the golem of medieval Jewish myth). Perhaps what’s going on between the lines of the Islamic proscription of forms looking like truly living beings is the Satan-God Allah forbidding his minions from honoring the true God’s creation in art and liturgy — yet permitting such a possibility as long as the forms are defaced and deformed into their appropriately golem-like appearance, as would please the Demiurge (Allah).
2. Notice the references “D” makes to one way of rendering unfit dolls into permissible dolls: beheading:
But if a person wants to be on the safe side in such matters, he should cut off the head…
He also adds the luridly weird advice:
… or hold it near the fire until it softens, then he should press it until the features disappear.” — this, of course, having a source in an official (and officially insane) Islamic fatwa: “(Majmoo’ Fataawa al-Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him), 2/277-278, cited here)”
Thus, my second thought, expanding on the first: The Islamic penchant for beheading, and for rampant disfiguring of the enemy with knives (as well as with fire and acid, not to mention the stones that reduce women to a bloody pulp in stonings; or the savage clitorectomies that are, and have been for centuries, pandemic throughout the Muslim world) may well be an extension of the doll-defacing impulse: go after not merely artistic renderings of God’s creation, but also attack God’s artwork itself — the creatures He has created, and try to destroy, decapitate, deface, disfigure them in your Satanic frenzy of obeying the evil Demiurge who throughout all history tries to compete with God but, knowing deep down he really can’t, opts for lashing out destructively instead: “If you can’t Create, Destroy”.
And it’s not just human creatures Muslims like to disfigure, but as this report indicates, animal torture is common among Muslims too:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/08/afghan-soldier-ally-murders-two-more-us-troops.html
najis_kafir says
Interesting and disturbing observations (including the 2012 comments), but what else should we expect from something that was created by Satan.
Perhaps the ideal islamic doll would be a random chunk of bloody sponge. Squeeze it and it bleeds. Stab it and it bleeds. Burn it and it gives off a horrible smell, chars, and oozes. For added realism, an electronic device could be embedded in the middle of the sponge that emits horrific screaming, crying, and groaning sounds when abused in any of the ways described above.
Spartan24 says
Amish dolls are common tourist items and I’ll admit it was a little freaked out the first time I saw one. However as it’s been noted, Amish aren’t known for violence.
voegelinian says
Yes, that’s the crucial point, always. No matter how ridiculous or repellant Islamic beliefs may be, they could all conceivably (and some of them have actually) exist in a culture, religious or otherwise, without a nexus toward 1) violence, joined at the hip to 2) a supremacist-expansionist entelechy (further augmented by a xenophobic misoxeny* and an eschatological lunacy).
It’s that nexus that makes Islam, and its Muslims, a security problem endangering our societies.
And then, on top of that, it’s the cultivation of taqiyya — coupled with the growing small mountain of data we have of the False Moderate and the Stealth Jihad (helloooo, Holy Land Foundation trial, Jihad Watch Softies… wakey, wake…!!!) – that renders the Muslims involved in that nexus a total problem, eliciting the dreaded A word: all Muslims.
* misoxeny: http://glossaryhesperado.blogspot.com/2007/01/misoxeny.html
Further Reading:
The dreaded A word
http://hesperado.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-dreaded-word.html
joeblough says
This is the peak of Mohammedam sexual aesthetics — the faceless lump, lost in a crowd of faceless lumps — and the true meaning of things like the burqa.
We have figures like Columbia, Mona Lisa, Athena, Nike, Joan of Arc, Liberty — even for children, American Girl, Barbie, Raggedy Ann. They have the nameless, faceless black sheet.
We enshrine the figures of women — real or imaginary — who represent the best things in life. Female figures that embody great good.
The Mohammedan feminine ideal is the shapeless, faceless, nobody.
When you stop to think about it, it isn’t just an assault on feminine representations of ideals, it is an general assault on human ideals, period!
“Islam” makes people bad, dishonest and crazy.
cheekturner says
Hey Folks, chill out! See this is just what was needed………Miss Piggy….halal style!!!!!!!!!!
cheekturner says
The creator of this hideous crap says
“Some parents won’t leave the doll with their children at night because you are not allowed to have any eyes in the room…”
Too right…no witnesses to pedo. activities eh?
Bunch of superstitious morons……Note the similarity of this doll to all (and I mean ALL) Muslims…..
NO BRAINS!!!!!!!
Alice says
I was wondering what the justification for no eyes was… creepy!
Ashley says
How disturbing.
What’s next? A deformed doll with acid burns to her face with a tag that reads “I dishonored my family?”
Champ says
A faceless doll is an interesting metaphor for what islam does to a person …turns them into a heartless, soulless and yes, faceless, zombie.
islam is evil to the core …
Champ says
Oh my that *is* creepy! ..and unquestionably *weird* to even think of making a faceless doll! I make adorable rag dolls for my g’children, and I spend a lot of time on the Face; in fact, I was trying to upload pictures of the dolls I’ve made to share with you guys, but for some reason I’m not able to do that …
Anyway, yes, a faceless doll is *spooky* ..as is islam on the whole.
BlueRaven says
This Muslima ‘Designer’ started from scratch and ended up designing a worthless piece that is missing the design. I forgot, the ‘design’ was also an Islamic invention. It will be interesting if many Muslims buy them. The Muslims are sooo pervert they can’t even handle a beautiful looking doll because that entices them to rape.
The idea I like about this doll – it is aimed at Islamic girls and the folks in the UK must be getting more and more tired of these ludicrous Abues coming out with crappy ideas in every direction that you care to look. I can’t imagine any Western kid going to buy one, unless you want to draw a cartoon on top of the head and call it Mo.
citycat says
Eyes can be a postal for remote viewing spies
The looker to the eyes making the connection without knowing
Champ says
Your comment reminds me of this verse from the Bible …
“The eye is the lamp of the body. If your eyes are healthy, your whole body will be full of light.” — Matthew 6:22
Hmm, the mohammedan doll without a face and eyes seems more and more apropos, lol!
citycat says
a friend stole my bible
i thought it was if thine eye be single, never mind
doesn’t have to be eyes
two holes in a wall will suffice
citycat says
portal for remote viewing spies
Richie says
This perfectly captures what Muslim men think of woman. To them, women are less than nothing
Richie says
I thought the Muslim savages kill people over statues and dolls. Don’t they regard dolls as a form of idol worship?
Edward Davidson says
Definitely not a true Islamic doll. It seems to still have a head.
St. Croix says
The headless one would be the Kuffar doll. Coming soon to a toy shop near you.
Anonamustafa says
Next will be the Tonka trucks loaded with little bombs in them for the boys to play with.
Jae M says
And little suicide belt accessories.
Jay Boo says
It looks a little bit like a voodoo doll or a pin cushion which is quite an appropriate reminder to the little girls that if the step out of line the will become an honor killing pin cushion.
JRemmy says
So “Muslims” are committing a deadly sin by 1.) watching TV, 2.) Looking at a Newspaper or a Magazine, 3.) Looking at a Cartoon 4.) Looking at a Passport, Driver Licence or ID Card etc…………….
vickie says
Someone mentioned the Amish. I will mention http://www.willowtree.com/
One thing at least the face is not veiled. Are there men dolls with no faces?
Lioness says
What a ghastly sight! Any child will have nightmares if this monstrosity is lying next to them in bed. Represents Islam perfectly: creepy and twisted.
Sridhar says
This is absurd beyond belief.