• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK: Palace sentries retreat behind gates for fear of jihad attacks

Dec 28, 2014 3:05 pm By Robert Spencer

Sentry retreatAs always, British authorities choose retreat rather than confrontation of the jihad threat. There is no possible way that this can end well.

“Retreating of the Queen’s Guard: End of an era as palace sentries fall back in face of mounting fears of new ‘lone wolf’ terrorist attack,” by Abul Taher and Mark Nicol, Daily Mail, December 28, 2014:

Security chiefs have taken the dramatic step of withdrawing Royal Guards from their high-profile posts outside palaces amid mounting fears of ‘lone wolf’ terrorist attacks.

Elite soldiers of the Queen’s Guard have pulled back from public positions at many landmarks in response to possible threats from Islamic extremists.

For the first time since the height of the IRA’s terror campaign, the soldiers are also no longer allowed on sentry duty alone, and are now accompanied by armed police.

The move to more secure positions behind gates or railings is a direct response to attacks such as the murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby and the killing of a sentry by a lone gunman at the Canadian Parliament two months ago.

But the measures have been described as a ‘retreat’ for the Guards, known the world over for their bearskin caps.

Retired officer Major Iain Dalzel-Job of the Scots Guards told The Mail on Sunday: ‘I think this is a big shame.

‘The reason people know we’re around is because they can see us. But I suppose the changes are necessary as there is a significant threat.’

This newspaper has confirmed the changes to the Guards’ security at sites including Clarence House, St James’s Palace, Windsor Castle and Horse Guards Parade….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: dhimmitude, United Kingdom Tagged With: Royal Guards


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. mortimer says

    Dec 28, 2014 at 3:13 pm

    ON THE GOOD SIDE, ROBERT…this is an admission that jihadists are living in Britain.

    There’s no sense throwing away the life of a ceremonial guard and provide any measure of victory to the jihadists! They will say Allah is powerful. The police can do the policing. The guards will return after the British people decide they’ve had enough and throw out the barbaric savages. Most Pakistanis living in UK are Deobandi savages who agree 99% with the Taliban! The jihadists hide among them.

    • BlueRaven says

      Dec 28, 2014 at 5:06 pm

      “The guards will return after the British people decide they’ve had enough and throw out the barbaric savages.” – After talking with a couple of British politicians, they don’t seem to think that is a viable solution because the number of pakistanies living in the UK is over 1.5 millions – that is way too much for anyone to deal with wrt throwing them out.

      They could ask them to leave voluntarily to their choice of a paradise, such as ISIS, Iraq, Pakistan, Sordie Arabia, Syria, Iran to name a few, If I were a Muslim I would be overwhelmed with the amazing choice on offer.

      • JMB says

        Dec 28, 2014 at 7:10 pm

        1.5 Million is not too large a number to relocate. Larger numbers of persons have ben moved at other times, eg war, and this IS war. The choice should be deportation, or internment till the terror ceases or a generous repatriation incentive with automatic cancellation of British passport (if they have one) as soon as they touch down at their preferred destination.

        1.5 Million is far to large a group of Muslims to be in Britain. Even if only 1% are radical, extreme, jihadists or terrorists that is fifteen thousand criminals on the loose and at large throughout the UK. This is unacceptable as it is but the real figure is probably much more.

        • pumbar says

          Dec 28, 2014 at 10:58 pm

          That 1.5 million figure is way too low. There’s way more than that in the UK.

  2. Millie says

    Dec 28, 2014 at 3:23 pm

    The British embrace these jihadist. The police and Pm do nothing to stop it so now they are beating at the Queens front door. Maybe she’ll pull her head out of the sand and do something now that her way of life has started to change. Although I don’t think she is bright enough to see what is happening

    • Angry says

      Dec 28, 2014 at 4:36 pm

      Prince Charles is on the verge of converting to jihad, he’s currently learning arabic in order to read the qu’rap. In March, 2013, Prince Charles quoted this:

      “The Islamic world is the custodian of one of the greatest treasures of accumulated wisdom and spiritual knowledge available to humanity.”

      So, from a personal prospective, I hope the royal apologist for islam, and his family of apologists, get to see the light and indeed get what they deserve!

      There will be NO sorrow from me when it happens!!!!!!

      • Islamisdeath says

        Dec 28, 2014 at 5:53 pm

        Defender of The Religion indeed!

    • pumbar says

      Dec 28, 2014 at 11:00 pm

      “The British embrace these jihadist”.

      What a ludicrous assertion, neither myself or any UK JWer embrace jihad or jihadists. Where on earth did you get that idea?

      • Gruff says

        Dec 29, 2014 at 12:58 am

        Turning a blind eye while 1,300 British girls are raped, and that’s just in Rotheram: Allowing unfettered entry into the UK of Muslims: sitting passively by while vast swathes of sovereign Britain are turned into no-go areas for non-Muslims, watching mutely while Christians are slaughtered in Muslim lands, and an Archbishop of Canterbury praises Sharia, and says its acceptance into the UK is inevitable etc. If the British people aren’t embracing Muslims and Jihad, just what precisely are they doing?

        • pumbar says

          Dec 29, 2014 at 10:03 am

          Most of those problems would have the beginning of a solution by leaving the EU. I hope that my country will vote for a party that leaves the EU next year. There are no real islamic no go zones in the UK, to the extent that there are in France. The ones here would buckle under a couple of lads leaving a pub.
          Brits are not watching, mutely, while Middle Eastern Christians are getting killed; they are helping actively.

        • Robeaver says

          Dec 29, 2014 at 12:57 pm

          letters written to local, provincial, and federal governments come back with form letters. Letters to newspapers not noticed. Not published, certainly. Citizens have no say im immigration. Or policies.

      • JMB says

        Dec 29, 2014 at 1:22 am

        “Where on earth did I/we/you get that idea?”

        Answer; 1, From the daily propaganda and appeasement of Islam in the media. 2, The Royal Family and the former Archbishop of Canterbury all seem to embrace multiculturalism including Islam. 3, British tourist guides that tell us all about the wonderful diversity of curry restaurants in the British Midlands. 4, Your NHS, they say we can not do without South Asian medical staff. 5, The British Government who refuse to properly acknowledge the Lee Rigby murder. 6, Your PM, he sees no problem with embracing Islam in the UK. 7, Your local councils, they have allowed a mosque to be built in every high street.

        I am sure there are many other reasons.

        • pumbar says

          Dec 29, 2014 at 4:41 am

          All that garbage appalls us, the majority of us never wanted this , never voted for it and were never asked. Things are beginning to change though, people are becoming more vocal, the rise of UKIP is astonishing and, hopefully, next May we will send a very clear message to Downing Street and Brussels.

  3. ECAW says

    Dec 28, 2014 at 3:46 pm

    Yes, this is a sorry state of affairs.

    On another note, this might be of interest to those of us with nasty suspicious minds:

    “A spokesman for Glasgow City Council, which owns the bin lorry involved in the George Square tragedy, said it would “never release the names” of the driver or other two individuals who were in the cabin when it crashed.”

    http://www.scotsman.com/news/transport/glasgow-bin-lorry-crash-driver-identity-protected-1-3645006

    • cs says

      Dec 28, 2014 at 3:51 pm

      It raised my eyebrows.

    • Andrew GB says

      Dec 28, 2014 at 4:15 pm

      Well, well, well! Great job Glasgow for raising suspicions only hope the coroners court will provide the details otherwise people might put two and two together and come up with Glasgow airport.

      Anyway, in Britain we know pislam is a cult of peace so we’ll be alright. Interesting to note that the foundations for a Super mosque are being prepared in Bolton WITHOUT planning permission being obtained.

      Speaking to residents near the area apparently tensions are running high. Again, nothing in the press about it. Free press in the UK my arse.

      • Crixus says

        Dec 28, 2014 at 5:38 pm

        There is no such office as that if coroner in Scotland. Fatal accident enquiries are held by the Sheriff Court, in Scotland a Sheriff is equivalent to a crown circuit judge except they are appointed to specific administrative areas known as Sheriffdoms. In Scotland, the role of the Sheriff is closer to its original definition ‘Shire Reeve’ a Reeve was the King’s Representative in a specific area, given or and judiciary rolled into one.

        Despite the immediate suspicion we all had about the bin lorry incident, it is not a Jihadi attack. The real villan here is the Scottish diet because by all accounts and many eye witness statements, the driver was large, white and slumped over the wheel while his companions were desperately trying to gain control of the vehicle.

        This one was just a tragic accident.

        However, it speaks volumes about how the press have made us distrust them as we all looked for the doublespeak and the denials. Everyone I have spoken to about this immediately thought, another attack.

        I wouldn’t underestimate the cynicism of the people on this point and it is good news as it means that the message is slowly sinking in.

        As far as the Guards decision is concerned, I think it is pathetic. They should take precautions by trebling the guard and having them equipped with combat gear rather than dress uniform, this is how they were dressed in Ww2, we are at war despite what the pricks in Westminster tell us and it would remind people visibly.

        As for a Lee Rigby attack, well Lee was unarmed and jumped from behind. I’d like to see a couple of fat bearded tossers take on a combat fit soldier armed with 7inches of razor sharp bayonet and a loaded automatic rifle armed with a kitchen knife! Bring it on…

        • ECAW says

          Dec 29, 2014 at 4:00 am

          Re Glasgow: Two things remain in my nasty mind.

          Why try to regain control of the vehicle as opposed to stop it? Don’t garbage trucks have a hand brake?

          If events were as you say then there would only be sympathy for the driver. If the authorities wanted to create an atmosphere of suspicion and possible ill feeling they couldn’t do better than to try to keep the names secret. I imagine anyone in Glasgow with a relative in the police, hospital service or refuse department will already know anyway.

          Re Palace guards: Yes, the obvious thing to do would be to arm the guards and put them in combat gear. That would give the population the clear idea that we are in a war. Oh yeah, that’s exactly what our leaders are trying to hide from us. I’m afraid it’s going to take a sizeable heap of the bodies of soldiers, police and shoppers before the people say “We’re not putting up with this bollocks any more”. What happens then? Do our leaders have any contingency plans?

          At least we now have the answer to the question “Who guards the guards?”

        • Andrew GB says

          Dec 29, 2014 at 6:39 am

          Well excuse me for being so terribly wrong about the coroners court! However you must have understood the sentiment in order for you to exercise your duty of being a sanctimonious prick.

        • ECAW says

          Dec 29, 2014 at 6:47 am

          “Why try to regain control of the vehicle as opposed to stop it? Don’t garbage trucks have a hand brake?”

          OK, scrub that. Have heard from an ex-trucker that the passengers would likely be flying around the cabin unable to do much at all.

        • Kepha says

          Dec 29, 2014 at 9:19 am

          @Crixus:

          Thanks for the short excursus on Scottish institutions. I had an academic interest in the history and underlying ideas of Scots Law after reading Stair’s _Institutions of the Laws of Scotland_. It’s often hard for us on the western edge of the pond to realize that England and Scotland have their varied large and small differences, even among people who support the union.

          I’m also a little curious to know a bit more about how former Commonwealth immigration had been impacting Scotland, since most of our news about your island concerns English cities.

  4. Paul says

    Dec 28, 2014 at 4:41 pm

    It will save dodgy dishonest Dave from having to lie to us yet again, claiming
    that a Muslim who chants ‘Allahu akbar’ whilst butchering a British serviceman
    who then justifies the horrendous act with quotes from the Koran has absolutely
    nothing to do with Islam.
    It’s almost as much an insult to our intelligence as claiming that trechery, deceit
    and vindictiveness have nothing to do with this awful, crappy government of ours.

  5. dumbledoresarmy says

    Dec 28, 2014 at 5:02 pm

    They should have doubled or tripled the number of the guards *visibly* present…and backed them up with special ops snipers, watching – unseen – from vantage points nearby.

    The soldiers who volunteered to be on visible duty should be aware that they are, in effect, the “bait” in a trap. (I would have sent all such soldiers to Israel to be trained under those who train the young men and women who man the checkpoints, so that they could learn how to spot someone who might be carrying a bomb or a knife, *before* they get close enough to do harm; the number of times the Israeli border guards pick up on such creatures and are able to neutralise them in time, is quite impressive).

    Muslims are cued by their belief system to respect nothing but raw Power unapologetically wielded. They back down, eventually, if they encounter determined resistance that possesses and wields overwhelming force.

    So the proper response to elevated threat from Muslims, would be to up the ante and, instead of retreating, to make an increased display of force.

    I would suggest, for those ‘ceremonial’ guards, British non-Muslim soldiers who have served on the front lines in Afghanistan. And I’d suggest recruiting, for those guards, among British Gurkhas and Sikhs.

  6. dumbledoresarmy says

    Dec 28, 2014 at 5:10 pm

    I observe something curious about this Daily Mail article.

    Note the byline. “Abul Taher and Mark Nicol”.

    Now, Abul Taher *might* be a Copt. But it’s more likely that he is not.

    And if he is a Muslim, then we have yet another instance of what is becoming all too common in the Press – bylines on news articles in which one sees one Infidel name and one Muslim name. Which basically boils down to an Infidel reporter with a Muslim “minder” breathing down their neck and/ or telling them what they can and cannot report and how they should or should not report it.

    There was, so far as I can see, *no* necessity at all for a Muslim to be co-reporting on this particular story. This is a story about a British tradition that is under threat from Muslims. No card-carrying Muslim should have been allowed anywhere near the reporting of it. Would one always anxiously make sure that one had a neonazi riding herd on any reporter who did a report on the activities of neonazis?? A mafioso co-reporting when one was covering threats from the Mob to a politician or a restaurant? A klansmen if one were discussing a threat from the KKK?

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 28, 2014 at 7:57 pm

      Agree with you on both counts, DDA. These guards *should not* retreat—they should instead have many more guards—all armed—on very visible duty.

      And I started to notice the increase in Muslim by-lines after 9/11, principally on stories from Jihad zones. Apparently, Buckingham Palace is now a Jihad Zone. *Ugh*.

      And one always wonders about the full accuracy of such stories, where the Muslim is likely riding herd on the Infidels, ensuring that nothing too “Islamophobic” gets through.

      Abul Taher is Bangladeshi, and originally worked for the “Eastern Eye” Newspaper, Britain’s major “Asian” newspaper, eventually rising to News Editor. That paper’s owner—Sarwar Ahmed—lives in the infamous Tower Hamlets, where virtual Shari’ah law holds sway. One might wonder why a newspaper publisher—even in these diminished days—would live in what we Yanks would call a “Housing Project”, but I’m sure he maintains a residence there for political purposes.

      Abut Taher is definitely Muslim—one of the links on his Wikipedia page is to other “British Muslims”.

      Here he is in an editorial published September 10th, 2002, whining about unfair attention focused on Mohammedans:

      “After September 11”

      http://www.theguardian.com/media/2002/sep/11/september1120011

      He writes, rather chillingly: “As a journalist, I felt my role had changed from that of a mere reporter to a representative of the community, trying to give the correct image of Asians in such a time of crisis, as well as delivering the correct news to the self-same group.”

      In other words, this was the point where he swung into full-on Taqiyya mode as a Muslim apologist…

    • somehistory says

      Dec 28, 2014 at 10:54 pm

      an Infidel reporter with a Muslim “minder” breathing down their neck and/ or telling them what they can and cannot report and how they should or should not report it.

      There was, so far as I can see, *no* necessity at all for a Muslim to be co-reporting on this particular story. This is a story about a British tradition that is under threat from Muslims. No card-carrying Muslim should have been allowed anywhere near the reporting of it. Would one always anxiously make sure that one had a neonazi riding herd on any reporter who did a report on the activities of neonazis?? A mafioso co-reporting when one was covering threats from the Mob to a politician or a restaurant? A klansmen if one were discussing a threat from the KKK?
      *******************************************************************************************************

      I, too, thought about this. They must protect their image even as they report on the threats they are making.

      • Darren says

        Dec 29, 2014 at 1:42 pm

        It reminds me of the old Soviet Union who had party officials breathing down the necks of even their own military officers.

  7. Gabe says

    Dec 28, 2014 at 5:26 pm

    Britannia throws in the towel to the towel heads…

  8. Ragai Mitry says

    Dec 28, 2014 at 5:36 pm

    Abject Brittania. Cowards don’t deserve to live free. Either you FIGHT, yes fight, with words, protests, WHATEVER it takes, to take your OWN country back, or forever live under Muslims. The clock is running out.

  9. jj barnes says

    Dec 28, 2014 at 6:25 pm

    “as always the British retreat”…….what a miserable excuse of a rag this website is…you’re a 3rd rater spencer…

    • St. Croix says

      Dec 28, 2014 at 8:03 pm

      What is it that you find so offensive?

    • gravenimage says

      Dec 28, 2014 at 8:04 pm

      Is that so? What would *you* call this, if not a retreat in the face of Islamic savagery?

      The fact is that Robert Spencer will forthrightly expose *any* dhimmitude, wherever he finds it—including in his native Untied States.

      You should be fighting this cowardice in the face of Muslim supremacy, rather than attacking someone who dares expose it.

    • Champ says

      Dec 28, 2014 at 8:12 pm

      What’s the matter, jj, is the ugly Truth about islam & company too hot for you to handle? Seems so.

      The Truth hurts …

    • Jay Boo says

      Dec 28, 2014 at 9:07 pm

      jj barnes seems a bit cranky
      He conveniently misquoted from the first sentence “British authorities” leaving off the word “authorities” by only writing the “British” as if to imply inaccurately that this is about all the British.

      However, I believe we are being too harsh on criticizing these authorities.
      The British authorities have actually made a good sound tactical decision in this case given the current situation in Britain and furthermore, I would even go so far as to commend them for their willingness to make a strategic retreat in face of an eminent threat regardless of any public ridicule that might come their way. Bravo!

      Of course this is in no way to excuse the rampant groveling toward Muslims as a policy that got them into this mess in the first place, nor the disgraceful abandonment of over 1400 young British girls to horrendous abuse by the followers of the sex slave-trade ideology merely for the selfish convenience of keeping up appearances of political correctness toward Muslims should they show any outward concern to the pleas of British children for help, that fell on deaf ears.
      British authorities take notes:
      That was truly despicable.

    • eib says

      Dec 29, 2014 at 9:43 am

      As always, from the onslaught of Islam, the British RETREAT. It is the truth, Barnes.

    • Angemon says

      Dec 29, 2014 at 2:04 pm

      jj barnes posted

      ““as always the British retreat”…….what a miserable excuse of a rag this website is…”

      No one is forcing you to stay. Don’t let the door hit you on your way out.

  10. Salah says

    Dec 29, 2014 at 1:26 am

    “Palace sentries retreat behind gates”

    Definition:
    Sentry: a soldier standing guard at a point of passage. (Merriam-Webster)

    Logic:
    A soldier standing guard must be HEAVILY ARMED. Otherwise he’s reduced to some kind of “decoration.”

    • Jen says

      Dec 29, 2014 at 3:51 am

      I cannot take the UK backing down like this to this threat any longer. It’s painful. It just doesn’t make any sense. They worry about individual or isolated attacks, knowing that the attacks are likely to continue indefinitely until bullets are flying everywhere and attacks are even more intensified and in the end they will do as the non-western world does in dealing with Muslim savages- suppress them by intimidation and force with no regard for bloody ‘human rights’ or anything of the like – all guards heavily armed and an ongoing fixture because there’s no telling when Muslims will strike again. Why delay the inevitable. Get on with it FFS. What is up with all these “decoration” style guards? What are you guarding without being armed anyway? Not your life, that’s for sure. Where is the warrior spirit when confronting something attempting to destroy you? Part of me is laughing because it is just painful and beyond ridiculous. Never have I appreciated the warrior spirit of my mother’s side of the family more than when I see what my British side is doing to itself. We know where this is likely heading anyway so chop chop.

    • Kepha says

      Dec 29, 2014 at 9:28 am

      I get the sense that the Queen’s guard is largely ceremonial–at least the guys in bearskin hats and red coats. When I hear about armed police in this story, I guess that those are perhaps the people with the real job of keeping the Royals safe?

    • Yokel says

      Dec 30, 2014 at 4:54 pm

      These guards are indeed purely ceremonial. There will almost certainly be no bullets in the gun, let alone one in the spout ready to let loose. They are only there to pander to the needs of tourists, and to fool us British into thinking that nothing has changed.

      • Robeaver says

        Dec 30, 2014 at 8:42 pm

        Yes, Them Redcoats are ceremonial, but are actual trained soldiers, same as the Canadian “on guard” at our national war memorial, who was shot in cold blood. Now they drive cars, we had that as well, here in Canada.

  11. Jen says

    Dec 29, 2014 at 2:57 am

    Islamization of the West – including New Zealand

    “Muslim leaders know that many in the West are ignorant and they are easily deceived. Lack of knowledge has always been the gateway for Islamists to enter, occupy and slaughter throughout the history of Islam. If you do not understand Islam and the will of its followers, your only choice is to be deceived by Muslim leaders. This is the reason why England and other European countries have lost a great deal to Islam.”

    “Our hope is that people in the West would wake up to the subtle threats of Islam for the safety of their own nations’ future. It is painful and alarming that many people do not believe or take seriously what we, as those who were once radical Muslims, have to say. At times, some western people stand against us or charge us with vilifying Islam and Islamists anytime we speak out. This is because Islam’s approach is so subtle, masking its insincerity.”

    Shari’a states; Ladies belong to inferior class (Q.2:228); in inheritance shares, they get half (Q.2:11, 176). Two ladies witness is equal to one man’s (Q.2:282). Ladies must abide at home; if they go out they have to cover themselves in order not to be known; any one who stands against must be slaughtered (Q.33:33, 59-61). Husbands own their wives (Q.53:2). Husbands beat their wives (Q.4:34; 38:44). (Muhammad) Do not treat your wives alike, no matter how eager you may be to do so (Q.4:129). Wives should not be saddened for anything you may give ell them (Q.33:51). Despite all these clear evidences in the Qur’an against women, there are books published and distributed by Muslims in the West, saying that Islam gave rights to women at a time when there was no equality. They state that men and women are equal in the sight of Allah.6 Despite being contrary to the truth, they can claim this because they have the freedom to lie. Lying to non-Muslims is permissible in Islam (Reliance of the Traveller, P.745)7.

    “These verses provide some insight into the intention of Muslim leaders proposing Shari’a to the English Government. They want Britons to accept Islamic law as the sovereign law; otherwise, the ever-present terrorism will continue. According to Islam, unless infidels convert, it is a sin to cease fighting against them.”

    “If this is what Shari’a means, how, then, are Muslim leaders able to propose it as the solution for the West? Why do some westerners want to compromise with Islam, if this is the case?”

    “Many middle-eastern background men and women, who live in the West, clearly understand the subtle lies of Muslim leaders who claim to be moderates. Unfortunately, many of them keep quiet and do not speak out for religious, cultural, political and social reasons. They know it is these so-called moderate Muslim leaders who pave the way for the law of Islam and radicals. If these so-called moderate leaders did not teach the Qur’an in the West, the jihadist groups would not exist in the West and would not be able to succeed and advance.”

    “Why are mosques, Islamic schools and colleges springing up in every corner of non-Islamic countries to indoctrinate thousands of young people, when it is illegal for non-Muslims to practice or spread their religions and beliefs in Islamic countries? What is allowing Muslim leaders to teach Qur’an’s hate and killing verses in the mosques in non-Islamic countries? Why would Muslim leaders even dare ask for the establishment of their Islamic judiciary systems in non-Islamic democratic countries (i.e. Australia , Canada Germany, Great Britain and Sweden ) despite Islam’s opposition to democracy and egalitarian values? Why do Muslim leaders in the West have freedom to speak against democracy, the social fabric of western societies? What has brought the West to this shocking stage when it is producing its own Muslim terrorists, who carry out their terror operations in the West (their own countries) and abroad in Pakistan , Afghanistan , Kenya , Tanzania , Saudi Arabia , Iraq , Israel , Morocco and Russia ?”

    “What do we need to do? Do we care for our societies? Should we wait for Muslim leaders to change their attitudes and do something in favour of democracy? Are we aware that the Qur’an teaches Muslims to stand against democracy? The Qur’an says, “It is not for a believer, man and woman, to have any choice in their affairs, when Allah and his apostle (Muhammad) have decreed a matter… (Q3.33:36). If Muslims have such instructions from the Qur’an, how do you think it possible for them to act against this? Can a branch cut its own root?”

    “What has caused the West to allow tolerance for such violence and hatred which undermine the freedom of the majority? Why has the West forgotten its heroes who laid down their lives for freedom decades and centuries ago? What has caused the West to betray its heroes? Why is Islam, which is under obligation to gain power over other nations, evidently more acceptable in the West than any other religious group?”

    http://www.nzcpr.com/islamization-of-the-west-including-new-zealand/

  12. wallace says

    Jan 6, 2015 at 8:11 am

    All may not be lost in the good old U.K , we have a Peppa Pig World in Hampshire, fun for the whole family, also the Ann Summer sex shops are now stocking a range of burkas with plunging eyeslits . So all in all things are looking good for 2015

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • SKA on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Infidel on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.