• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK powerless to stop Islamic child marriage

Dec 21, 2014 8:46 pm By Robert Spencer

childmarriageprotestersThe UK can do nothing to stop this because the UK does not have the will to stop the advance of jihad and Sharia in Britain. The Home Office will act against counter-jihadists such as Pamela Geller and me, but wouldn’t dare enrage its increasingly aggressive Muslim population by moving against child marriage.

Few things are more abundantly attested in Islamic law than the permissibility of child marriage. Islamic tradition records that Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, was six when Muhammad wedded her and nine when he consummated the marriage:

“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).

Another tradition has Aisha herself recount the scene:

The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became Allright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, “Best wishes and Allah’s Blessing and a good luck.” Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah”s Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age. (Bukhari 5.58.234).

Muhammad was at this time fifty-four years old.

Marrying young girls was not all that unusual for its time, but because in Islam Muhammad is the supreme example of conduct (cf. Qur’an 33:21), he is considered exemplary in this unto today. And so in April 2011, the Bangladesh Mufti Fazlul Haque Amini declared that those trying to pass a law banning child marriage in that country were putting Muhammad in a bad light: “Banning child marriage will cause challenging the marriage of the holy prophet of Islam, [putting] the moral character of the prophet into controversy and challenge.” He added a threat: “Islam permits child marriage and it will not be tolerated if any ruler will ever try to touch this issue in the name of giving more rights to women.” The Mufti said that 200,000 jihadists were ready to sacrifice their lives for any law restricting child marriage.

Likewise the influential website Islamonline.com in December 2010 justified child marriage by invoking not only Muhammad’s example, but the Qur’an as well:

The Noble Qur’an has also mentioned the waiting period [i.e. for a divorced wife to remarry] for the wife who has not yet menstruated, saying: “And those who no longer expect menstruation among your women, if you doubt, then their period is three months, and [also for] those who have not menstruated” [Qur’an 65:4]. Since this is not negated later, we can take from this verse that it is permissible to have sexual intercourse with a prepubescent girl. The Qur’an is not like the books of jurisprudence which mention what the implications of things are, even if they are prohibited. It is true that the prophet entered into a marriage contract with A’isha when she was six years old, however he did not have sex with her until she was nine years old, according to al-Bukhari.

Other countries make Muhammad’s example the basis of their laws regarding the legal marriageable age for girls. Article 1041 of the Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran states that girls can be engaged before the age of nine, and married at nine: “Marriage before puberty (nine full lunar years for girls) is prohibited. Marriage contracted before reaching puberty with the permission of the guardian is valid provided that the interests of the ward are duly observed.”

According to Amir Taheri in The Spirit of Allah: Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution (pp. 90-91), Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini himself married a ten-year-old girl when he was twenty-eight. Khomeini called marriage to a prepubescent girl “a divine blessing,” and advised the faithful to give their own daughters away accordingly: “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.” When he took power in Iran, he lowered the legal marriageable age of girls to nine, in accord with Muhammad’s example.

“Home Office powerless as legal loophole leaves underage child brides free to join husbands in Britain,” by Nigel Nelson, Mirror, December 21, 2014:

Child brides from overseas can legally enter Britain because of a legal loophole.

If the girl is wed lawfully in her homeland her husband cannot be prosecuted under UK law, Theresa May’s Home Office said.

Officials made the admission after the Bishop of St Albans Alan Smith asked the House of Lords what steps the Government was taking to protect girls already in under-age marriages from coming into the UK.

Schools minister Lord Nash told him social services and police might be involved if there were child protection issues, but the law as it stands cannot stop child brides entering the UK in the first place.

It is not known how many do so, but the Home Office Forced Marriage Unit says of 1,302 cases investigated last year, 15% (195) involved under 16s.

Rt Rev Dr Smith told the Sunday People: “I’m pleased to have unearthed ­anomalies our Government must wrestle with if it is to secure the future and safety of young girls brought into the country.”

Yasmin Rehman of the End Violence against Women Coalition said: “Child marriages should be illegal in this country.

“We protect British-born children, but we seem to think children from other countries have lesser rights if they are child brides.”

Under forced marriage laws passed earlier this year, their weddings would be illegal only if they were coerced.

In August, Home Secretary Mrs May failed to prevent a girl of 15 from Eritrea in Africa from coming to Britain, despite fears her marriage was illegal….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: child marriage, Sharia, United Kingdom Tagged With: UK Home Office


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Jay Boo says

    Dec 21, 2014 at 9:05 pm

    Young girls have always been bought and sold and purchased from overseas on the slave trade religion’s sex slave market.
    Muslims tried that BS on Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

  2. Saleem Smith says

    Dec 21, 2014 at 9:29 pm

    The UK is on a path to welcoming Sharia.

    After all, the many evils of Islamic law are nothing more than “the laws of Alllah” Muslims find clearly written in the Quran and the sayings and doings of the Muhammad the prophet of Islam recorded in the Sunnah.

    We ex-Muslims know that Islam is a fraud.

    Here is a recent statement from a group of Bangladeshi apostates living in the UK explaining the reasons why they have abandoned Islam:

    “One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammad’s life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives (Qur’an 33:50). He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way…

    The statement continues,

    Muhammad was a narcissist, like Hitler, Saddam or Stalin. He was astute and knew how to manipulate people, but his emotional intelligence was less evolved than that of a 6-year-old child. He simply could not feel the pain of others. He brutally massacred thousands of innocent people and pillaged their wealth. His ambitions were big and as a narcissist he honestly believed he is entitled to do as he pleased and commit all sorts of crimes and his evil deeds are justified.”

    • St. Croix says

      Dec 21, 2014 at 9:44 pm

      They give a good summation there of the “prophet.” I do hope and pray many more come to their senses and leave that religion.

    • Ann Inquirer says

      Dec 21, 2014 at 10:05 pm

      Today Mo. would be diagnosed as deluded and a pathological liar for making up Allah and saying he had revelations. He get the diagnosis of narcissist for calling himself the Perfect Man. But his main diagnosis is that of a psychopath, just the Surah 9 alone is from the mind of one.

    • Shane says

      Dec 22, 2014 at 9:24 am

      Since Muhammad is considered the perfect example for Muslims to follow and he was a womanizer and a pedophile, Muslim men feel it is okay to abuse women and little girls. Non-Muslim women who marry Muslim men are fools.

      • Western Canadian says

        Dec 22, 2014 at 4:35 pm

        muslim women who marry muslim men are also fools, but they have been raised from birth to be such.

    • cassandra says

      Dec 22, 2014 at 12:35 pm

      Sounds just like Rasool Obama…

    • PRCS says

      Dec 22, 2014 at 12:44 pm

      “the sayings and doings of the Muhammad the prophet of Islam recorded in the Sunnah.”

      Make that the sayings and doings as ‘alleged’ in the Sunnah.

  3. Richie says

    Dec 21, 2014 at 9:36 pm

    there is no way to win a war if a nation is too frightened to even name the enemy.

    • Shane says

      Dec 22, 2014 at 9:26 am

      Most Western nation’s leaders are afraid to name the enemy and to stop all Muslim immigration, but many of the citizens know and speak the truth about Islam, jihad, and Muslim sexual abuse of women and girls.

    • Jay Boo says

      Dec 22, 2014 at 12:40 pm

      “One of the worst ways to deal with villainy is to give it credibility”
      Islam is filth.

  4. St. Croix says

    Dec 21, 2014 at 9:41 pm

    “Under forced marriage laws passed earlier this year, their weddings would be illegal only if they were coerced”

    Coerced? Are they thinking a little girl is going to volunteer to marry an old man? Her parents and the man and his family who want her are not going to have any “coercive” effect on her? A child is going to stand up for herself and say “I refuse!”?? In a muslim country?

    This really is beyond the pale. But what is really going on is that clever legal beagle Islamists and sympathizers are working behind the scenes with precedent-setting rulings on relatively minor situations that can then be used to allow loopholes for Sharia to undermine the legal system already in place in our countries. It’s a practice used by many institutions and companies behind the various lobby groups, not just Islamic.

    • Salah says

      Dec 22, 2014 at 1:50 am

      “A child is going to stand up for herself and say “I refuse!”?? In a muslim country?”

      Yes. Check out this video:

      http://crossmuslims.blogspot.ca/2010/03/pedophile-muhammad-mahomet-le-pedophile.html

      • St. Croix says

        Dec 22, 2014 at 5:53 pm

        Salah, I did see that video before. A brave and unusual child! I think she is a rare instance of a girl child in that culture who can take a stand and make a plan to escape. I wish all the children subjected to such heinous designs could find a way to get out. I do believe that many would not even be able to consider that there is a way out, let alone devise a plan. It means going against the parents and the whole culture.

        Do you know what was the eventual fate of this child? Did she remain safe? I hope she was not hunted down by her family to force her to return and carry on with the Islamic agenda–that the life of the “prophet” is the exemplar. When I realize that at 11 she is already two years older than Aisha was when she became the wife and bedmate of Mo it just makes me sick to my stomach.

  5. Ann Inquirer says

    Dec 21, 2014 at 9:56 pm

    Mr. Spencer, I think saying that the marriage was not consummated until Aisha was 9 is very misleading, because most decent people cannot imagine anyone touching a girl so young at 6. But that is not the case with Islam. That poor girl was thighed for 3 years, if anyone can imagine having that psychopath on top of hwr and masturbating between her thighs. Totally disgusting, and even worse, it is OK to do with with infants. Islam needs to be more exposed for this vile practice of thighing of infants.

    • Matthieu Baudin says

      Dec 22, 2014 at 3:21 am

      Ann, hasn’t Robert Spencer done a wonderful job providing an opportunity to speak our minds in an age of terror. Perhaps one day sections of the British public will nominate Mr. Spencer for a knighthood or perhaps his name will be put forward in Norway for a Nobel Peace Prize. I hope one of us is alive to see that day. Meanwhile it’s all too easy for the British authorities to shirk responsibility for the welfare of the children of their country. In addition to the child marriage fiasco, there has been no concerted effort so far to investigate and prosecute those responsible for female genital mutilation, though this is clearly one of the worst forms of child rape. Too many comfortable people in the bureaucracy, in government and in major social institutions are able to place this cruel disgrace outside of their attention, focus on their own life ambitions and sleep well at night. Ann, it’s people like you who are helping turn British public opinion around, to take action, to enforce current child protection laws in the UK.

  6. somehistory says

    Dec 21, 2014 at 10:02 pm

    No respect for the value of a life, allowing rape of British children rather than perhaps having someone call them racist; allowing *legal* rape of children because they fear confronting the beast that devours. If they respected and valued the life of children, they wouldn’t hesitate to act to protect them. Abortion which is killing of the unborn and rape of the born, which kills the spirit and many times takes the physical life of the child is allowed due to cowardice and lack of respect…they will reap what they are sowing…there is no escape.There will be no escape.

  7. Ayatrollah says

    Dec 21, 2014 at 10:03 pm

    Let’s place the fault where it lies. Believers enjoy what allah made lawful to them. There is no fault in that. If allah had wanted he could have said “wait until after their first course”.

    The fault lies with allah, leaving muslims blameless, just like pbuh.

  8. Jay Boo says

    Dec 21, 2014 at 10:19 pm

    Pat Condell on:
    The enemy within

  9. dumbledoresarmy says

    Dec 21, 2014 at 11:25 pm

    This is being reported because at least one person in the UK Government is *not* pleased with what is currently going on, and has been asking awkward questions.

    from the article – “Officials made the admission after the Bishop of St Albans Alan Smith asked the House of Lords what steps the Government was taking to protect girls already in under-age marriages from coming into the UK.”

    Bravo that man, the Bishop of St Albans! – dda

    “Schools minister Lord Nash told him social services and police might be involved if there were child protection issues, but the law **as it stands ** [my emphasis – dda] cannot stop child brides entering the UK in the first place.

    “It is not known how many do so, but the Home Office Forced Marriage Unit says of 1,302 cases investigated last year, 15% (195) involved under 16s.

    “Rt Rev Dr Smith told the Sunday People: “I’m pleased to have unearthed anomalies our Government must wrestle with if it is to secure the future and safety of young girls brought into the country.””

    UK jihadwatchers: contact Rt Rev Dr Smith, commend him for asking hard and necessary questions, and PUSH. And light a (metaphorical) fire under your MPs; ask them why *they* are not raising hell over this, also.

    If the current law, as it stands, permits evil to be perpetrated then…as countries throughout the west have done for centuries …the thing to do is to **change the bl**dy law**!!

    Years ago, in the UK, the legal age of consent for girls was…twelve. After a LOT of investigating (including undercover work in brothels), agitating, and campaigning, the law was *changed*, to raise that age to 16. Making it a lot harder to stock brothels with children. Because it’s a lot harder to pass off a nine or ten or twelve year old as a sixteen year old, than it is to pass off a nine or ten year old, as a twelve-year old.

    Laws were changed, back then.

    Laws can be changed, now. And they can be changed to *resist* Islamisation, provided enough people kick up enough of a stink.

  10. Larry A. Singleton says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 1:59 am

    Look forward to a name change: UKanistan

  11. Rob says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 2:24 am

    Gibbon wrote about Rome’s fall.
    Who will document Britain’s?
    What would WS Churchill think?
    Remember his wartime speech:
    ‘We will defend our islands’

  12. Charli Main says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 4:21 am

    Regardless of where these children were “married” or under what laws they were “married”, it is illegal to have sexual intercourse with a child under 16.
    Thighing her or touching her virgina is sexual assault, punishable by a long prison term.
    In recent months, numerous British ” celebrities” have been arrested and imprisoned for assaulting children.
    Its time for the gutless British Government to make clear to Muslims that they are subject to British laws.
    If the Muslims don’t like being subject to the Law of the Land——XXXX OFF.

    • Matthieu Baudin says

      Dec 22, 2014 at 8:10 am

      Well said Charli. Good to hear someone from Albion stand up for ‘equality before the law’. What you’ve had creep in is a dual track legal system that has developed by default; where enforcement of the law occurs, or fails to occur, after passing through a cultural sieve. One law for the locals and another for the ‘others’. The Swedes are also paying a high price for going down this route.

  13. clifford hall says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 4:55 am

    As Dumble says eloquently the law clearly need to be changed. As it is, there is a ‘Conflicts’ problem of the kind which the Law Society attempted to address in it ill fated ‘Guidelines’. The law of the place where the marriage took place would normally govern the validity of the marriage. This has nothing to do with the gutless British or “Ukanistan”.

    On the sexual assault point, remember that in the eyes of English law the parties are married. However, since for some years now it’s been held that a husband may commit rape if the wife withholds consent, it doesn’t take a legal Einstein to argue that an under-age girl is incapable of giving it.

    • Charli Main says

      Dec 22, 2014 at 5:09 am

      Whether the parties are married or not , it is still illegal to have sexual intercourse with a minor. In Britain, that is a girl under the age of sixteen.

    • Jay Boo says

      Dec 22, 2014 at 12:47 pm

      clifford hall
      It is simple
      These Muslim guys are pedophile rapists.

  14. Richie says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 6:07 am

    so apparently pedophilia is legal in the UK

  15. duh_swami says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 6:26 am

    The age of consent in Geo Washington’s days was 10 years. Child brides were common. There is a difference between consent for marriage and consent for sex. I don’t think this was considered in those days as none of these girls actually consented to any of this. It has taken humanity thousands of years to come around to giving children any rights or consideration at all. Children have always been subjected to exploitation and sex. Now those are illegal in modern western county’s, but not so in Islam…Islam has permission from Allah…There is no way to top that…

    • Jay Boo says

      Dec 22, 2014 at 12:50 pm

      But who is Allah, but the sock puppet of pedophile Muhammad.

      • St. Croix says

        Dec 22, 2014 at 6:01 pm

        Well, there is no god called Allah and Mohammed may never have existed.

        So they are probably both sock puppets. Of what? Of whom? How about a bunch of bloodthirsty, rapacious men who wanted to have it all their way?

        If you believe in a devil (makes sense to me), they are all sock puppets of same!

  16. wallace says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 6:29 am

    Surely there must be a case for our natural British pedos to take cases to the European Court of Human Rights , They must have parity with their Muslim compadres , we cant have a Britain where the rule of law is not equally applied can we? OH well must pop down to pick up my daily medication

    • Charli Main says

      Dec 22, 2014 at 8:10 am

      Could be a whole new industry here. Take a 10 year old to Pakistan and marry her, then bring her back and sexually assault her at will.
      Any checks by the police and social services can be met with ” we are married under the laws of Pakistan”. Go away, i have some legal thighing to do. LOL

  17. Zebo says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 6:56 am

    Mohammed raping child Aisha=no problem.Mohammed still the most perfect human being ever.

    but trying to forbid childmarriage(=childrape:)is not possible as it would put a bad name on mohammed.

    Muslim logic is so inherently perverted that child rape is considered alright(and does not give mohammed a bad name)
    while forbidding childrape is impossible as this would “ruin” mohammeds image.

    Every non-muslim person following muslims traditions,ideologies and laws would be instantly put into a mental asylum to protect humanity) from max. insane individual but as soon as you are a muslim doing so they call it culture.
    The only reason islam can hide its real and very ugly face with success is that most (so called moderate)muslims do not follow the insane teachings of satans quran.

  18. duh_swami says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 7:32 am

    moderate)muslims do not follow the insane teachings of satans quran.

    Islam is an absolute…’Moderate’ Mahoundians are not Mahoundians at all, They are hypocrites, heretics, and apostates who don’t deserve to live.
    On top of that, they have to explain all this to Allah when they die.
    That’s why we never see a real moderate, any that claim so, or seem so, are lying…

  19. David, Thailand says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 8:21 am

    “It is true that the prophet entered into a marriage contract with A’isha when she was six years old, however he did not have sex with her until she was nine years old, according to al-Bukhari.”

    Correction! Mohamed may not have had vaginal intercourse with Aisha until she reached the age of nine, but he did use other parts of her body for different forms of sexual gratification.

  20. BC says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 8:32 am

    They could deny entry or deport the man, of course the yuman rights lawyers would be all over that. I believe the singer Jerry Lee Lewis was denied entry to UK because of his marriage to his 13 year old counsin

  21. katarzyna says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 8:58 am

    it looks like they are also powerless to stop polygamy which is on the rise in Muslim Great Britain http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/11108763/The-Men-with-Many-Wives-the-British-Muslims-who-practise-polygamy.html
    but in some cases they can ban a Muslim man from having sex with his first wife.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11299532/Man-banned-from-having-sex-with-wife-by-High-Court-judge.html

  22. RC says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 11:52 am

    This is what happens when a nation’s people reject God–things will become much worse for the British; God is giving the British over to their Godless corruption!

    • Jay Boo says

      Dec 22, 2014 at 1:08 pm

      If certain secular humanists (hedonists) would just live and let live, as they imply that the wish to do, instead of whine and viciously slander one monotheist religion while simultaneously tossing out harmless token jibes at another monotheist religion or in some cases even showing groveling ass-kiss reverence to (Islam) they would be a lot more bearable.

  23. clifford hall says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 12:25 pm

    Given the anti-British sentiment on here, will one of our American bloggers kindly explore with us what the conflicts rules for the recognition of marriages celebrated out of the US are. Let’s take (a) federally, (b) in California, and (c) in Florida.

    • Jay Boo says

      Dec 22, 2014 at 12:57 pm

      This is not anti- British it is anti submission of politicians to Islam
      And now a word from Pat Condell
      His accent sounds a just bit British

  24. James Patterson says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 12:57 pm

    If the real reason is a legal loophole, why don’t they close the loophole and change the law?

    They DON’T WANT TO!

  25. Angemon says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 5:59 pm

    Child brides from overseas can legally enter Britain because of a legal loophole.

    If the girl is wed lawfully in her homeland her husband cannot be prosecuted under UK law, Theresa May’s Home Office said.

    I don’t know British law. What’s the process for acknowledging a marriage celebrated abroad?

  26. clifford hall says

    Dec 22, 2014 at 6:35 pm

    “It’s not anti-British….it’s anti submission of politicians to Islam”

    Will someone please tell me if there is any State anywhere whose government politicians are treading other than carefully with Islam in order to be PC?

    There would be no automatic right of entry for a foreign child bride of a British national – or of any alien spouse for that matter.

    Even if the law were changed, there would be difficulties. Who would the complainant be? If the bride is childless, how do you prove that the husband is in fact interfering with her even if there is evidence of interference at some stage in her life?

    • Matthieu Baudin says

      Dec 23, 2014 at 7:48 pm

      Dear Clifford, Britain gave us Churchill. Churchill, the British people together with the people of the British Commonwealth saved the Modern World, its decency and freedoms. The disappointment with Britain at the current time is against the background of the courage and commitment of its past. Churchill was amongst other things the greatest Frenchman of the 20th Century. Honorary Frenchman to be sure, but remember he considered himself a European Man and as the Third Reich began to strangle the country, floated the idea of entering into a full political union with France. So the British are being judged against the greatness of their past, which perhaps is a little unfair, but what yardstick would you prefer?

  27. wallace says

    Dec 24, 2014 at 5:28 am

    I have just written a letter to Prime Minister David Camoran. He has many times gone on at length to assure me that Islam is a religion of peace. I have asked if he would consider swapping his copy of the Quaran for mine. Mine doesn’t seem top-heavy on the peaceful bit, I seem to have acquired some obscure copy containing nasty stuff , beheadings, amputatations cruxifictions etc. I am sure David will be able to set me on the straight path

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • SKA on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Infidel on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic
  • Eva on Chief Rabbi of UK Says It’s ‘Alarming’ That 44% of Muslims Are Anti-Semitic

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.