• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Dearborn Muslima sues police department for forced hijab removal

Jan 23, 2015 6:06 pm By Robert Spencer

KazanMandating the removal of headgear of people in custody is simply a safety move. They could be hiding something under a hat — or a hijab. That Hamas-linked CAIR would be involved in this case shows that it has seized upon it as part of its ongoing efforts to weaken law enforcement, stop all law enforcement scrutiny of Muslims, and secure special privileges for Muslims in American society.

“Woman sues Dearborn Heights for forced hijab removal,” by Mark Hicks, The Detroit News, January 23, 2015 (thanks to Leo):

A Muslim woman is suing the Dearborn Heights Police Department over claims her rights were “stripped at the jailhouse door” last year when she was forced to remove her religious head scarf in custody.

According to the suit filed Thursday in U.S. District Court, police stopped Malak Kazan for a traffic violation July 9. An officer noticed the city native’s license had been suspended; she was arrested for a traffic misdemeanor.

The suit, according to one law professor , sets up a “clash of conflicting rights.”

While being booked, Kazan was asked to remove her hijab, which the tenets of Islam require for “covering her hair, ears, neck and part of her chest when she is in public and when she is in the presence of men who are not members of her immediate family,” the suit said.

Kazan told an officer she could not remove the head covering because that would violate her faith, but he said “there were no exceptions,” the court filing said. Her request for help from a female police officer also was denied, the document said.

The suit, which also names the city as a defendant, claims Kazan, 27, was denied her constitutional rights and suffered “severe discomfort, humiliation and emotional distress.”

It seeks a permanent injunction requiring Dearborn Heights police and the city to modify its head covering policy to allow for those worn for religious purposes as well as provide appropriate training. Damages also are sought.

“The main issue here is that my client’s constitutional rights, her religious liberties, can’t be stripped at the jailhouse door. She has an absolute right to maintain her faith,” attorney Amir Makled said. “We hope this cause of action will bring to light a policy that is dated and needs to be amended. … We also hope to get some further diversity training for officers in the city. Hopefully this will be a learning experience for other law enforcement agencies.”

Dearborn Heights Police Chief Lee Gavin did not respond to emailed requests for comment.

Gary Miotke, the city’s corporation counsel, said he had no comment Thursday “based on the fact that we haven’t been able to see the actual lawsuit and evaluate what the claims are and what this is about.”

Larry Dubin, a professor at the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law, said the case involves conflicting rights.

“Ms. Kazan is entitled under the First Amendment protection of her religious beliefs including the wearing of a hijab, which may cover part of her face. However, the police have the right to process a person who is being arrested.”

Similar claims of conflicts involving religion and law enforcement have surfaced. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled this week that a prisoner has the right to grow a beard for religious purposes “even though the prison officials believed improper drugs or other matter could be hidden from view,” Dubin said.

“The Michigan Supreme Court has given judges reasonable control over the appearance of people in court to make sure they can be properly identified and observed.”

Dubin added: “In my opinion, this lawsuit could have been avoided if the police brought in a female officer to book Ms. Kazan, which then would have permitted her to remove the hijab without violating her religious beliefs.

“In that way, the police would have afforded Ms. Kazan her constitutional rights while accomplishing the legitimate police work that needed to be done. Ultimately, a federal judge will decide how to balance these conflicting rights.”

The Council on American-Islamic Relations’ Michigan chapter met with Dearborn Heights and Dearborn officials last year about pursuing policies that would accommodate head coverings during bookings, executive director Dawud Walid said.

“We’re always open to meet with those two police departments again as well as in the local area to assist them in implementing policies that are religious-friendly,” he said.

He pointed out that since hijabs have been allowed in some military IDs, passport photos and state driver’s licenses, “wearing a head covering during a booking photo doesn’t impede in identification purposes.”…

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: CAIR, claiming victim status, Featured, Islamic supremacism, Jihad in prisons, Stealth Jihad Tagged With: Malak Kazan


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. AnneM says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 6:11 pm

    Good grief, more MUSLIM demands!

    • particolor says

      Jan 24, 2015 at 4:15 am

      Yes Its Bullshit ! And getting Worse !!

  2. cs says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 6:14 pm

    Or she uncovers, or you can change the name of the state to Detroitstan.
    Actually Dearborn is becoming Dearbornistan really fast.

    • katnis says

      Jan 23, 2015 at 6:38 pm

      It’s awful, isn’t it? Go to YouTube and check out what happens if you are a non-muslim and try to enter one of their festivals. You’d be taking your life in your hands. It’s an American version of the no-go zone.

      • cs says

        Jan 23, 2015 at 8:19 pm

        I have seen it. PEACEFUL MUSLIMS, THOSE CANDID CREATURES, throwing all sort of rubbish on some Christians.

        • Galen Muhammad says

          Jan 23, 2015 at 10:20 pm

          And you omitted the fact that the so-called Christians were harassing the festival attendees with there bullhorns, anti-Islamic propaganda and pig heads on spites! The imbeciles don’t even realize that Jews hate swine as much as Muslims do!!

        • Angemon says

          Jan 24, 2015 at 6:06 am

          Galen Muhammad posted:

          “The imbeciles don’t even realize that Jews hate swine as much as Muslims do!!”

          False equivalence. Jews don’t eat pork while muslims go out of their way to feel offended by anything pork-related:

          http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/08/vermont-restaurant-ad-for-bacon-removed-after-muslim-claimed-it-offended-her

        • Galen Muhammad says

          Jan 24, 2015 at 3:26 pm

          You view it such if you’d like.

          Quote reliable sources if you’re trying to make a point in truth….not a lie-filled source which only promotes lies and half-truths.

          Jews despise swine as much as Muslims despise swine! They have their kosher standards just like Muslims have our halal standards. We BOTH “go out of our way” to avoid eating filthy and forbidden swine! And stop lying against the Jews.

        • Angemon says

          Jan 24, 2015 at 3:50 pm

          Galen Muhammad posted:

          “Quote reliable sources if you’re trying to make a point in truth….not a lie-filled source which only promotes lies and half-truths.”

          RS posts the source of the news he comments on. Perhaps you should click the link in that article ans see for yourself? Also, lies and half-truths are the currency os islamic apologists, not JW’s – you could try to prove me wrong by trying to prove that JW promotes lies and half-truths.

          “Jews despise swine as much as Muslims despise swine! They have their kosher standards just like Muslims have our halal standards.”

          Jews don’t go out of their way to feel offended at any mention of pork, like muslims do.

          “We BOTH “go out of our way” to avoid eating filthy and forbidden swine!”

          The difference is that Jews don’t try to force their dietary restrictions on others – when was the last time a Jew tried to sue a school for serving jelly?

          “And stop lying against the Jews.”

          Oh really? “Lying against the Jews”? I said that Jews don’t eat pork. That’s not a lie, dumbass.

    • Lynn says

      Jan 23, 2015 at 8:29 pm

      Parts of Dearborn are sort of a no go zone too by the videos I’ve seen. Real flag waving Americans there…NOT!!!

      • Galen Muhammad says

        Jan 23, 2015 at 10:22 pm

        We’re left to assume you haven’t seen your favorite propaganda outlet, Fox “News” retract its lies about “no-go zones”…..

        • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

          Jan 24, 2015 at 12:43 am

          Hey there Moo-Ham. You haven’t watched the footage of the arrests made at your ‘Festival’ apparently. Do yourself a favor-take a gander: Acts 17 v. City of Dearborn.

          As for Fox’s retraction, that was a real mistake. No-not that they ‘wrongly reported’ the no-go zones. But that they APOLOGIZED.

          There are lots of no-go zones all over Europe, anywhere any concentration of you wonderful folks show up. That’s because the Europeans ain’t Americans.

          So you keep on pushing the envelope. We’re pretty dumb and PC just now Moo-Ham. But I tell you what: You really, REALLY don’t want to push your luck. ‘Cause we are, after all, AMERICANS.

          Now isn’t it time for you to beat one of your [clitoridectomized] wives? Or hoist your smelly rear in the air to pray to your pedophile prophet?

          You go along now. We’ll be fine. Just fine.

        • katnis says

          Jan 24, 2015 at 2:12 am

          Hey Moo-Ham. This is the perfect opportunity for you to defend your *faith*, rather than mudsling and accuse the rest of us. Jews and Christians get along pretty well in this country. Jews and Christians have a problem with YOU.

          Don’t you understand? YOU ARE NOT WELCOME IN THE UNITED STATES. Everyone on this site knows it. The rest of the country will figure it out eventually, and it won’t be because of Robert Spencer or anyone else. It will be because muslims will continue to murder, protest, burn flags, burn cars, raid villages, bomb buildings, kill cops, rape children, and bully and intimated and make ridiculous demands and so on and so on. YOU DO IT TO YOURSEVLES.

        • Angemon says

          Jan 24, 2015 at 6:08 am

          Galen Muhammad posted:

          “We’re left to assume you haven’t seen your favorite propaganda outlet, Fox “News” retract its lies about “no-go zones””

          That’s not what happened, although muslim apologists are spinning it that way.

  3. Angemon says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 6:22 pm

    While being booked, Kazan was asked to remove her hijab, which the tenets of Islam require

    Is that so? Where? Not that it matters, as far as I know the USA are a secular nation and if the law of the land says perps must remove the headgear they remove the headgear, whether they like it or not, regardless of what the little hate book of their death cult says.

    Dearborn Heights is close to Dearborn, Michigan, right? What a surprise…

    The main issue here is that my client’s constitutional rights, her religious liberties, can’t be stripped at the jailhouse door.

    Yes, how dare the police to strip criminals of their liberties at the jailhouse?

    We also hope to get some further diversity training for officers in the city.

    “Diversity training”? Well, I guess it’s shorter than “you can’t touch muslims, you filthy kuffar”.

    Dubin added: “In my opinion, this lawsuit could have been avoided if the police brought in a female officer to book Ms. Kazan, which then would have permitted her to remove the hijab without violating her religious beliefs.

    “In that way, the police would have afforded Ms. Kazan her constitutional rights while accomplishing the legitimate police work that needed to be done. Ultimately, a federal judge will decide how to balance these conflicting rights.”

    Huh? If all it took was a female officer there’s no need to get a federal judge to “balance” anything. Because all it takes is to have a female officer to strip muslimas of their headgear. Sounds like one of those “you don’t get halal because there’s a vegetarian option” cases…

    • Angemon says

      Jan 23, 2015 at 6:25 pm

      Also, what happens if they need to process someone in a burqa? Do they take the perp to a room alone with a female agent, not knowing if the person under the burqa is a women and is unarmed?

      • katnis says

        Jan 23, 2015 at 6:52 pm

        EXACTLY. We’re walking a fine line here. You know the burka will be next.

      • particolor says

        Jan 24, 2015 at 4:26 am

        Exactly ! There could be Closet Hate Preacher under that Burqua ??

  4. noellsq says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 6:23 pm

    CAIR an organization that should be outlawed in the US. They are anti american and they steal and cheat people.

  5. somehistory says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 6:25 pm

    From the article, she felt:..”. humiliation …”
    Sure, sure, she looks like that’s what she feels. No, she looks something more akin to proud of herself.

    Generally when people feel humiliated, they wish to go someplace and be alone, or with those whom they can feel close enough to talk it out and get over it, not go before a court full of strangers and *relive* the humiliating experience.

    Cause the police to tip-toe and walk on glass when dealing with muslims and make a little money on the side. It’s too bad a woman officer wasn’t brought in, but the muslim would have cried foul anyway. Break the law and then get paid for it.’This the nature of the beast.

  6. starwish246 says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 6:37 pm

    As long as it is the same rule for ALL, it is FAIR! NO discrimination involved. People can strangle other people using large head scarfs.

  7. Salah says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 6:38 pm

    There should be absolutely no special treatment for Muslims. NONE.
    After all, there is no mention in Islam’s “holy” books that Muhammad suffered any “severe discomfort, humiliation and emotional distress” every time he walked around COMPLETELY NAKED. On the contrary, he seemed to enjoy it!

    http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/03/muhammad-and-nudity-mahomet-et-la.html

  8. AnneM says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 6:43 pm

    Allah = Satan.

    • particolor says

      Jan 24, 2015 at 4:33 am

      Islam = Western Bucks.

  9. Xero_G says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 6:46 pm

    We’re often told the benefit to Muslimas for “covering up” is for their own “protection”. Apparently, since Muslim men cannot control their impulses (i.e. anger sparked by a perceived insult can easily lead to rioting), the women must conceal their hair because If exposed, a Muslim man, lacking self control, will have no choice but to try to rape her (and she will deserve it because her exposed hair provoked it).

    Malak Kazan is simply trying to protect the (male) police from urges to rape her if her super-sexy hair is revealed. This is why some are saying the whole incident could have been avoided if female police were instead involved with her identification.

  10. katnis says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 6:49 pm

    I hope that this does not go through as a law, setting another precedent that is a win for muslims and a loss for those who are trying to protect their communities.

    —-> And the clown said: I need to keep my clown makeup on for my mugshot. I never go in public without my clown makeup. I get PTSD without it.

    —-> And the rock star said: I need my headscarf on for my mugshot. If the rest of the world sees my receding hair line, it will damage my brand and I will lose trillions.

    You break the law, you get a mugshot without a stupid scarf on your head. Welcome to America.

  11. gerard says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 7:11 pm

    It always amazes me how Muslims. especially the women, seem not to be in the slightest bit bothered by all the horrors committed by Muslims around the world. You would think they wouldn’t want to show their faces anywhere in public!…Ah now I get it! Now I understand the burkha, hijab and niqab!
    But seriously, as they say, wouldn’t you expect them to be just a little bit embarrassed by the daily slaughter of non-muslims by muslims!? Au contraire! What you get every time is this smug, arrogant expression and demanding attitude!

  12. Canadian Patriot says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 7:50 pm

    Very observant of you! And you are quite right.

    I worked with a colleague in the past who was a “devout” Muslima, prayed during the workday sever times a day on company time, went on yearly trips to Mecca etc. etc. She was so “modest” and “pious” and yet wore full make-up (and it must be said that she was a very attractive woman), stilettos, and pants that accentuated her long legs. She also worked out religiously (pun intended). Can we say a complete hypocrite?!

  13. Kathy Brown, Esq.K says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 8:00 pm

    I went on their ‘Dearborn Community’ facebook page and engaged the [idiot] Muslim ‘law-yuh’ there.

    He is really, really dumb. They have neither the law, nor the facts, on their side. So it’s lucky they’re mu-slimes because, given the legal landscape in Dearbornistan, the only chance this ugly muzrat has is to constantly whine, ‘But I’m a Muslim!’.

    There, that counts for something. Too bad.

    For a good look at how the ‘Slimes operate when they have a larger population, google Acts 17 v. City of Dearborn. They’re disgusting. But WE WIN.

  14. Anon says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 8:22 pm

    “He pointed out that since hijabs have been allowed in some military IDs, passport photos and state driver’s licenses” … “wearing a head covering during a booking photo doesn’t impede in identification purposes”

    Translation, others get it wrong, so we are more likely to get our way.

    • Galen Muhammad says

      Jan 24, 2015 at 3:31 pm

      Translation: (NONE NEEDED. WE UNDERSTOOD PERFECTLY WELL WITHOUT YOUR MISINTERPRETATION)

  15. Ren says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 8:45 pm

    Won’t muslims ever understand when there are conflicting rights, it is the laws of the land that prevail? Are muslims playing stupid or what?

    • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

      Jan 23, 2015 at 9:31 pm

      Ren: No, they’ll not understand that.

      And no, they’re not ‘playing stupid’. They really ARE that stupid.

      If by ‘stupid’ we mean, moving to a country which touts its separation of church and state, then rampaging around in a frenzy demanding to change that.

      I’d call that stupid. Also obnoxious. And nuts.

      • Mirren10 says

        Jan 24, 2015 at 5:40 pm

        Hi, Kathy.

        I have to disagree with you here.

        ”And no, they’re not ‘playing stupid’. They really ARE that stupid.”

        No, they are not being stupid. This is deliberate.

        Part of the mohammedan MO is to challenge, whenever possible, and safe to do so, the laws and mores of the country they are infiltrating and infesting.

        By doing this, they are not only sticking two fingers up at kufr laws, they are also asserting that, as mohammedans, and therefore superior, **they, by virtue of their superiority to the kufr do not have to conform to the law**. She is also testing how strongly we will insist on *our* laws being obeyed, rather than meekly bowing to her wretched demands, because we are afraid of being perceived as ‘islamophobic. bigoted. and racist’.

        If the Dearborn police cave into her demands, or apologise for being ‘racist and islamophobic’, it will be chalked up as a victory, and will encourage others to do the same.

        I don’t know how long you’ve been a reader at JW, but if you search the archives for similar stories, you will see the MO is pretty much the same.

        It’s all about Islamic **supremacism**.

  16. E. Alexandra Pierce says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 9:14 pm

    It’s about time! I wonder if CAIR will help bring a lawsuit against my own local police department. When I was arrested, the cops at the jail told me to take off my shaggy headdress made entirely of spaghetti noodles. I explained that, as a devout Pastafarian and member of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, it would violate my religious sensibilities to have the removal done without the assistance of a specially trained chef. Imagine the sense of violation I experienced when they didn’t pay any attention to me and I was forced to suffer the humiliation of being de-pastad right in front of them!

    Ibrahim Hooper, help me!

    • particolor says

      Jan 24, 2015 at 4:47 am

      Your lucky ! Our branch of the Spaghetti Heads has to walk 7 times around a Cauldron of Boiling Hot Pasta Sauce before removing the Spags !!

  17. Bezelel says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 10:37 pm

    One very important thing to remember. No body is supposed to like jail.

  18. kevin says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 11:23 pm

    What makes these muslims think they are “holier than thou” by just wearing a piece of cloth on the head?, what if she were concealing narcotics? also if the law went in her favor then couldn’t all drug dealers wear hijabs to conceal their drugs without the risk of a frisk? if these people don’t understand how free socities need to work then they have no right to live amnogst the civilized

  19. mortimer says

    Jan 23, 2015 at 11:44 pm

    Don’t like jail? Don’t do the crime, dolly.

    A scarf can be used to strangle or hang someone. The Islamic veil is a signal to the jihadists so she will not be raped by them.

  20. Foolster41 says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 12:33 am

    Galen Mohammad: “And you omitted the fact that the so-called Christians were harassing the festival attendees with there bullhorns, anti-Islamic propaganda and pig heads on spites! The imbeciles don’t even realize that Jews hate swine as much as Muslims do!!”

    If you mean Acts 17, that is a lie. They did none of those things and they were wrongfully arrested. There was another group doing those things. Last time checked though, being obnoxious was not a criminal offence.

    http://www.answeringmuslims.com/p/dearborn.html

    Fox News retracted, sure, but that doesn’t make it untrue. Did Newsweek, The New Republic of the New York Times retract?

    http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/01/european-no-go-zones-fact-or-fiction

    Nice try at trying to convince people no go zones don’t exist.

  21. Arthur says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 1:34 am

    Perhaps an Arab native speaker can help with understanding what Islamic texts actually say about the covering of women’s bodies.

    Hunting around the web I find:
    Quran An-Noor 24:31 > …women … not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent, and to draw their veils all over Juyoobihinna and not to reveal their adornment except to ….

    So, the first question is what “Juyoobihinna” (or Juyubihinna) means. Apparently it originates from Jiim-Ya-Ba which means to cut out a collar of a shirt, or the opening and bosom of a shirt, and thus comes to mean neck and/or chest. Since, historically, women of the era walked around topless, it would seem clear that the Quran is only asking for the chest and neck to be covered. The extension to the head seems based more on hadith saying that Mohammed pointed to hands and face and said those were the only parts that should show.

    I believe there are also written exceptions for not adhering to Islamic law when forced to do otherwise (does someone have the reference?). So it would seem the argument about having to wear a hijab is actually not so literal and is based more on a conservative interpretation of what is written, and what a woman wants to do.

    Bottom line: a person in police custody for breaking the law (driving on a suspended license), may not have things go the way that person *wants* them to. This woman isn’t going to burst into flames for taking off her hijab, and it’s unclear whether she actually faces any religious consequence of doing so.

    Anyone could claim their interpretation of their religion (however nutty) calls for Champagne Wishes and Caviar Dreams, but in police custody you just don’t always get what you want.

    • Mirren10 says

      Jan 24, 2015 at 6:11 pm

      ”Perhaps an Arab native speaker can help with understanding what Islamic texts actually say about the covering of women’s bodies.

      Hunting around the web I find:
      Quran An-Noor 24:31 > …women … not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent, and to draw their veils all over Juyoobihinna and not to reveal their adornment except to ….”

      I would suggest that this is not an original Islamic injunction (insofar as *any* of the Islamic texts can be considered to be original), but merely a plagiarism of the Old Testament recommendations for women to cover their heads when in the synagogue.

      islam, of course, has twisted and perverted this original recommendation into a suggestion that any woman who **doesn’t** cover her head is a dirty slut, ungodly, and not really a proper mohammedan, and conversely, all women who adopt the hijab (or are forced into wearing it) are proper, godly muslimahs.

      I have googled, and searched in various books, but I have yet to find an example of an Orthodox Jewish woman, who has used this ‘covering the hair’ mandate, to a) subvert the law, or b) to suggest that because her religion mandates she should cover her hair, she is therefore in a privileged position, and that the laws of the land should not apply to her. If anyone here can find such an example, I would be glad if they would post it. (Oh, and any supremacist Amish women as well, with their sweet little caps. 🙂 )

      As I said before, this is straightforward **Islamic supremacism**.

  22. particolor says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 4:29 am

    I wonder what His cut of the Loot will be ??

  23. Lia Wissing says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 5:16 am

    Make 1 law for all, everywhere in the USA: no ID, passport or any identification photographs that hide peoples’ faces, by headscarf, balaclava, motorcycle helmet or anything else at all.

  24. DrJohn says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 6:03 am

    Actually, Katnis, these ignorant dark age bastards are not welcome anywhere in the civilised world, apart from being welcomed by our stupid, ignorant, appeasing, politically correct politicians who have never studied the Qur’an and the Hadith.

  25. arunn says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 6:30 am

    LOL
    anyway what was she doing driving a car!!!
    verrry UN Islamic:))

    • Jimbo says

      Jan 24, 2015 at 9:22 am

      @Arunn….lol.hilariuos!!!!! This should be thrown back at those filthy deceptive liars CAIR. We why is it she was driving a car!

      If its because it’s legal in the USA, then do CAIR want that rule changed so it’s in one with Saudi Arabia ,a very nice little sharia country, NOT!!!!

  26. elizabeth says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 7:09 am

    When will someone just explain to the muslims that it was the devil, not the angel Gabriel, that appeared to Mohammed, and even he knew it, but was persuaded by others to believe that it was from God.

    Satan is rubbing his hands with glee.Not only has he got muslims hating the west and non believers, but now has Christians hating as well.

  27. Nanook8 says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 8:38 am

    Why do we keep letting them immigrate in the millions to this country, when they are so incompatible with other societies? We need a better screening process.

  28. WCM says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 8:48 am

    Dearborn (Dearbornistan) is this close [ ] to becoming a No-Go Zone and is so, during the above-mentioned “festival.” It is not surprising that the Dearborn Heights cops did what they did and apparently did so well enough to get past this CAIR-initiated nuisance (Aren’t they all?) suit. I sincerely hope Dearborn Heights does not cave, because the Muslim cancer (Satan’s cult and sin) is spreading quickly.

  29. FarmerMike says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 9:24 am

    Hey, how about a class action suit against the Koran for using “hate speech.” Certainly, the multiple directives within the Koran which urge Muslims to kill us unbellievers, us kaffirs, qualifies as hate speech that “generates a feeling of inferiority as to …[our] status in the community that may affect … [our] hearts & minds in a way unlikely to EVER to be undone” if we’re dead, to use the words of the 1954 Supreme Court decision of Brown v. Bd of Ed. [Emphasis added.]
    I’m ready to sign on, if someone knowledgeable about filing such a suit can take the lead.
    Anyone else want to join me? We can make this a REAL class action suit. The mass media will HAVE to take notice, dontcha think?
    –FarmerMike
    Reply

  30. Angry says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 9:49 am

    Another muslima not respecting the law of the land. The law is the law for all, there should be NO two-tier system that treats the ever demanding muslims with favouritism, and treats non-muslims like second-class citizens.

    So the message to muslims, women especially, if you want to wear the bag, don’t commit a crime.

    Lastly, what makes her think that a non-muslim male would find her attractive if she showed her hair, ears etc..? There’s 100% chance of her being raped by one of her own, considering muslima’s only stick with muslim males due to their bigoted nature towards non-muslim males.,

  31. CJ says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 10:22 am

    Driving on a suspended license – halal
    Uncovering your head in front of an infidel – haram

    BTW — if she’s so devout, what’s she doing driving anyway?

  32. Doreva says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 10:27 am

    More evidence to prove my thesis that, because of the emphasis on the prurient aspect of a woman NOT covering her hair, head and shoulders, that the wearing of the hijab is equivalent to wearing your underpants on your head!

    • Galen Muhammad says

      Jan 24, 2015 at 2:57 pm

      Doreva:

      In other words, you’re verfying that your so-called thesis is nonsensical.

      Thanks for the heads-up!

    • Mirren10 says

      Jan 24, 2015 at 6:40 pm

      ”In other words, you’re verfying that your so-called thesis is nonsensical.”

      Actually, no. *You* are simply verifying that islam has rotted your brain, to the extent that you are incapable of understanding, or reasoning, from A to B.

      Doreva in fact, made a good point. If the sight of head hair is so incredibly erotic ( and note, also, that Orthodox Jews who recommend the covering of head hair, do so, not on the basis it is erotic, but it is merely respectful in the synagogue (not that I agree with them on this), then, what, in the name of God, would such as you consider to be **actually** erotic ? The mind boggles …

      Pubic hair. Well, you don’t seem to have nearly as much animus against *that*, as you do on someone’s head ! Surely, pubic hair should be far more erotic than whether one’s sliced in fringe is visible ? Pubic hair, after all, covers most human beings genitalia.

      There are various photographs available on the internet, which show numerous doe eyed and
      hijabetted lasses, whilst wearing G strings, makeup, et al. Really, how ridiculous you are !

      • Galen Muhammad says

        Jan 24, 2015 at 8:23 pm

        Sounds like the person promoting their awfully flawed thesis is the only one with “issues”….

        Seems to me that anyone comparing the hijab with underwear us the one with the rotted brain. And the same applies to all who agree with such a person !

        • Angemon says

          Jan 24, 2015 at 8:30 pm

          Galen Muhammad posted:

          “Seems to me that anyone comparing the hijab with underwear us the one with the rotted brain. And the same applies to all who agree with such a person !”

          Then again, it seemed to you I lied about the Jews when I said Jews don’t eat pork. I believe Doreva wrote “the wearing of the hijab is equivalent to wearing your underpants on your head“. Comparing the wearing of the hijab to the wearing of underwear is not the same as comparing the hijab to underwear, is it?

    • BlackCatsRUS says

      Jan 24, 2015 at 7:14 pm

      hahahaha! Great call! Totally ridiculous as people are given the orange jumpsuites to wear. Wearing that black gag bag on her head? Foolishness – Mohammed only wanted his wives and CAPTIVE slave women covered as his men were looking at them – which angered Mohamm the Pedophile-Raper. Hence he ordered the women covered. What 7th Centruy barbarism! We can’t have this crap going on in jails and prisons. If this woman actually thinks men are drooling over her to rape her anytime soon, she is as delusional as the mohammadans and their idiot founder.
      For new and exciting bio on Mohamm from islamic sources go to amazon for F.W. Burleigh’s new book of the psychopathic Mohammed: “It’s All About Mohammed, the World’s Mot Notorious Prophet.”

  33. Ross says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 11:34 am

    If your religion is in conflict with the laws we all must obey, you should practice your religion elsewhere.

    My religion says I should keep an M-16 (not an AR-15) with me at all times, because people of “The Religion of Cowardice” want to stab me in the back.

    These people will never assimilate, have declared war on us, and should not be allowed in The West. Send them all back where they can enjoy each other’s company.

    • Bukkdem Jizheads says

      Jan 24, 2015 at 3:37 pm

      It could be she was having a bad hair day.

      • Galen Muhammad says

        Jan 24, 2015 at 9:01 pm

        And if it’s NOT in conflict with the country’s laws…??

  34. Dave J says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 2:04 pm

    “Freedom go to Hell”

    “Democracy go to Hell”

    “Equality go to Hell”

    No special rights or treatment for Muslims. Islam go to Hell.

  35. Robbi says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 4:58 pm

    When Muslims first started buying homes in Dearborn, there was no conflict and no publicity. Now that the Muslim population has substantially grown, the Muslims are very active at chipping away the “America” part of the city and turning it into another Muslim dominated enclave. This same process is at work in Western countries around the world, where Muslims immigrate for “freedom and prosperity” and then use the host country’s tolerance laws against the host county and its population. The Qur’an teaches that world domination is the ultimate objective and that the process of jihad against non-believers is a religious obligation (not all jihadist wear masks and carry physical guns!). Makes a person wonder why, if Islam is so wonderful, that Muslims keep coming to the West for “freedom and prosperity”.

  36. Semeru says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 5:30 pm

    Looking at the picture of her here, she would of tasted the whip in any Sharia compliant land

    She fails on three points

    1. The hijab (covering) must conceal the entire body except the face and the hands.

    2. It should not be translucent or tight. Tight clothes, even if they conceal the colour of the skin, still describe the size and shape of the body or part of it, and create vivid images.

    3. It should not attract the attention of the opposite gender; thus it should not be extravagant or excessively opulent. Nor should jewellery and makeup be on display.

    4. It should not be a garment worn because of vanity or to gain popularity or fame. The female companions were known to wear black and other dark colours but other colours are permissible; a woman must not however wear colourful clothes because of vanity.

    5. It should not be perfumed. This prohibition applies to both the body and the clothes.

    6. It should not resemble the clothing worn by men.

    7. It should not resemble the clothing that is specific to the non-Muslims.

    • CogitoErgoSum says

      Jan 24, 2015 at 6:00 pm

      In other words, do not try to look or act like the human being God made you but rather like the colorless, odorless, tasteless, formless blob of insignificant nothingness Muhammad wished you to be so as to make himself feel more important than everyone else.

      • Galen Muhammad says

        Jan 24, 2015 at 8:30 pm

        In the meantime, the world applauds the “Lady Godiva” wannabes…..showing all that God’s given her or what she paid to enhance.

        Both are human, mind you. I prefer my female family members to respect themselves.

        • MKG says

          Jan 25, 2015 at 2:45 am

          I know a few female nudists who have a lot of self respect and dignity. They are plain Jane and have fully accepted their bodies as God had made them. The scars of life are in clear view and they are not afraid to look you in the eye. There is nothing sexual about it.

        • CogitoErgoSum says

          Jan 25, 2015 at 12:12 pm

          If the sight of a certain thing offends you, avoid looking at it but do not blame your hurt feelings on someone else. Your feelings come from within yourself and that is where your main concern about the cause of your feelings should be. Likewise, don’t blame your own carnal desires on someone else. God gave you eyes to see both good and bad and He let’s you make the choice as to where your gaze lingers. Pluck your eyes out if you think you are too weak to withstand the test but you will be the loser.

        • Galen Muhammad says

          Jan 25, 2015 at 11:47 pm

          Your ranting, babbling reply stated nothing nor did they refute the truth that I stated.

        • Galen Muhammad says

          Jan 25, 2015 at 11:52 pm

          You’re either no student of Biblical scripture or you wronglyassumed I’m not.

          My left eye does not offend me and I have no desire to pluck it out.

          Try your deception on someone else, imp of Shaytan!

  37. cs says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 6:11 pm

    For those of you who never saw, I recommend it.

  38. eweturn says

    Jan 24, 2015 at 7:15 pm

    http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/clip/11061525/let-it-rip-pt-1-muslim-woman-sues-dearborn-heights-police

    the lady’s attorney , a director of Arab American anti discrimination association, and others, discuss this suit, and police procedure.
    The was arrested for driving on suspended license. She had 4 contacts with police, traffic misdemeanors, resulting in bench warrant, with second warrant issued for failure to appear.
    Her attorney argues that she was humiliated and embarrassed. The civil rights director opines the Arab American and M/E communities are not represented in Dearborn, and said she is tired of the “public safety” card and dehumanizations of Muslims.
    As the video progresses, viewer live tweets scroll across the bottom. I did not note any in support of special hijab exception.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Michael Copeland on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • Dude on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.