• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Gitmo detainee swapped for Bergdahl returns to jihad

Jan 30, 2015 9:34 am By Robert Spencer

Gitmo detainees swapped for BergdahlWe warned that this would happen. But everyone knew it was “Islamophobic” to think such a thing. Anyway, now we have a man who is probably going to be tried for desertion in exchange for at least one jihadist who will try to kill more Americans. And the other four will probably also rejoin the jihad as well.

“Officials: Detainee swapped for Bergdahl suspected of militant activities,” by Barbara Starr, CNN, January 30, 2015 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

The U.S. military and intelligence community now suspect that one of the five Taliban detainees released from Guantanamo Bay in return for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl in May of last year has attempted to return to militant activity from his current location in Qatar by making contact with suspected Taliban associates in Afghanistan, multiple officials tell CNN.

The development has led to an ongoing debate inside the administration about whether there is a new threat from this man, and potentially the other four.

This is the first known suggestion that any of the detainees involved in the exchange may be trying to engage again in militant activity. It comes at a politically sensitive time as the administration has quickened the pace of prisoner release in an effort to encourage the closure of the Guantanamo, and the Army must decide in the coming weeks whether and how to punish Bergdahl for leaving his post.

Several U.S. officials across different agencies and branches of the U.S. government have confirmed key details to CNN. The White House referred CNN to the Pentagon.

The officials would not say which of the five men is suspected. But an ongoing U.S. intelligence program to secretly intercept and monitor all of their communications in Qatar turned up evidence in recent months that one of them has “reached out” to try to encourage militant activity, one official said. The official would offer no further details.

Under current law, this act placed the man in the category of being “suspected” of re-engaging in terrorist or insurgent activities. However, several officials say there is now a debate inside the administration that the intelligence may be stronger than the “suspected” classification. Some elements of the intelligence community believe the information is strong enough to classify the man as “confirmed” for returning to illegal activities. All five men are having their communications even more closely monitored right now, but the belief is there is no current threat, one official told CNN….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Guantanamo Tagged With: Bowe Bergdahl


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Jaladhi says

    Jan 30, 2015 at 9:50 am

    To wage jihad is every Muslims duty. What does anybody think these “pious” Muslims are going to do – give up jihad and then burn in hell in afterlife. Now our Sherlock administration is going to say these people are not Muslims for returning to jihad!! Problem solved – poor Muslims can’t do anything wrong even when they murder somebody right in front of your eyes!!

    • Don McKellar says

      Jan 30, 2015 at 10:46 am

      Exactly. Either the administration is completely clueless about the basics of Islam, substituting wishful thinking instead of education, and therefore dangerous and incompetent when it comes to foreign affairs, or it is under the command of a moslem in disguise, who is working to advance Islam at every turn. It can only be one or the other.

      • Jaladhi says

        Jan 30, 2015 at 11:16 am

        I think the administration is totally lying in compliance with the PC regimen which has engulfed it or somebody is just trying to advance Islam all over the world including this country. It is that obvious!!

  2. BC says

    Jan 30, 2015 at 9:54 am

    “The U.S. military and intelligence community now suspect
    This is the first known suggestion that any of the detainees involved in the exchange”
    Sorry RS but are you not jumping the gun a bit here. Is it not better to hold off until we have some actual evidence?
    I agree that the swap for Berdahl was wrong in many ways and I know you like to have a swing at Obama whenever possible. However I think you lose some credibility whenever you go off half cock on this kind of thing.

    • Mirren10 says

      Jan 30, 2015 at 10:15 am

      ” However I think you lose some credibility whenever you go off half cock on this kind of thing.”

      *I* think you need to hone your reading skills a bit.

      The quotes you’ve copied are from the *CNN* article, not Robert’s comments.

      • Semeru says

        Jan 30, 2015 at 11:37 pm

        CNN; Officials: Detainee swapped for Bergdahl suspected of militant activities

        After a spot of Spencer,s truthbending, the title of CNN,s becomes Gitmo detainee swapped for Bergdahl returns to jihad

        Nowhere in the article does it state that the former detainee has returned to Jihad

        • Jay Boo says

          Jan 30, 2015 at 11:49 pm

          jihad defined as violence

          Aha!
          so you admit that jihad is not just a peaceful internal self-reflection.

        • BC says

          Jan 31, 2015 at 12:41 am

          Thanks

        • Angemon says

          Jan 31, 2015 at 5:59 am

          semeru posted:

          “Nowhere in the article does it state that the former detainee has returned to Jihad”

          Some elements of the intelligence community believe the information is strong enough to classify the man as “confirmed” for returning to illegal activities.

        • Mirren10 says

          Jan 31, 2015 at 12:24 pm

          Semeru says:

          ”Nowhere in the article does it state that the former detainee has returned to Jihad.”

          So, what do you reckon he’s up to by contacting the Taliban ? Just catching up with his bros ?

          You’re such a tosser.

        • Semeru says

          Jan 31, 2015 at 2:01 pm

          Some elements of the intelligence community believe the information is strong enough to classify the man as “confirmed” for returning to illegal activities.

          That does not mean that he has returned to illegal activities, it is the opinion of some elements of the intelligence community

        • Mirren10 says

          Jan 31, 2015 at 4:31 pm

          So, what do you reckon he’s up to by contacting the Taliban ? Just catching up with his bros ?

          Answer the question.

      • BC says

        Jan 31, 2015 at 12:40 am

        So you think that explains it? Well he may be quoting but he is supporting his quotes as though they are facts. His opening sentence is:
        “We warned that this would happen”. Has it happened? No it is all supposition. there is nothing wrong with my reading skills but I cannot say the same about yours

        • Mirren10 says

          Jan 31, 2015 at 12:30 pm

          “We warned that this would happen”. Has it happened? No it is all supposition.”

          Here’s what the article says:

          ”However, several officials say there is now a debate inside the administration that the intelligence may be stronger than the “suspected” classification. Some elements of the intelligence community believe the information is strong enough to classify the man as “confirmed” for returning to illegal activities.”

          So, you think you know better than the ”intelligence community” ?

          ”there is nothing wrong with my reading skills”

          If you say so …

        • Semeru says

          Jan 31, 2015 at 4:14 pm

          Mirren10/agrononse

          I suggest you read the full article

          Congress receives a report every six months on the status of detainees transferred out of Gitmo. The latest report in September 2014, showed about 17% of detainees transferred out of Guantanamo Bay are confirmed by the U.S. to have returned to militant activity. About 12% are in the suspected category.

          Regardles that some elements of the intelligence community believe the information is strong enough to classify the man as “confirmed” for returning to illegal activities, the former detainee has been placed in the suspected category, so Spencer/Geller are truth bending

        • Angemon says

          Jan 31, 2015 at 5:30 pm

          The dunce posted:

          “I suggest you read the full article”

          I did, and I suggest YOU do the same, You see, I quoted a bit form the end. Unless, of course, you’re insinuating that by some sort of magical art I just happened to jump to that particular bit.

          “Regardles that some elements of the intelligence community believe the information is strong enough to classify the man as “confirmed” for returning to illegal activities, the former detainee has been placed in the suspected category, so Spencer/Geller are truth bending”

          Translation: “If you ignore the evidence supporting Spencer and Geller then they’re ‘truth bending'”.

          How can it be “truth bending” when members of the intelligence says it’s “confirmed”?

  3. mortimer says

    Jan 30, 2015 at 10:00 am

    “Moderate Muslims are only moderately Muslim.” In other words, they are uninformed about jihad (as in the previous post by Jiladhi).

    In other words, you can make a ‘moderate Muslim’ into a jihadist, but you can’t make a jihadist into a ‘moderate Muslim’.

    Why? Because you can’t ‘unlearn’ real knowledge. The jihadists cannot forget the authentic, canonical hadiths and rulings about jihad in Sharia law.

    The only approach that will effectively destroy jihad is to destroy belief in Islam entirely.

  4. mortimer says

    Jan 30, 2015 at 10:06 am

    “A moderate Muslim is only moderately Muslim.’

    Jaladhi is right that jihad is a central duty of Islam for all Muslims, but ‘moderate Muslims’ don’t know that yet.

    In other words, you can turn a ‘moderate Muslim’ into a jihadist. But how can you get a jihadist to forget real knowledge about Islam? How can you make the jihadist forget all he’s learn from authentic hadiths and authoritative rulings about the necessity of jihad?

    Answer: you can’t. You cannot turn a jihadist into a ‘moderate Muslim’, you can only destroy the faith of a jihadist by exposing him to incontrovertible proof that Islam has no provenance and that all the facts point to Islam being fabricated by the caliphs between AD 700 and 750.

    • Don McKellar says

      Jan 30, 2015 at 11:00 am

      Since when has an intensely pious and devout religious fanaticof any stripe been “turned” by being presented with facts and a logical argument? Human nature doesn’t work that way.

      To destroy the faith of a jihadist, you must make moves in accord with his faith. You must speak his language. What language does Islam speak? The language of violence and force. When presented with overehelming force and no chance of victory, moslems are commanded to retreat and stop fighting in Islam. So how do you get them all across the world to retreat and stop fighting at the same time? How do you make them accept that Islam at its heart has been destroyed by force? Forever? Force them to remember it five times a day, until most of them simple quit the religion. There is a way. And it’s fast, efficient, and its all in place to happen at the push of a button, and there only has to be, and should only be, one target.

    • Ima Freeman says

      Jan 30, 2015 at 11:21 am

      What about Walid Shoebat, former “Palestinian” terrorist convert to Christianity? He now fights on the side of good. Only 1,499,999,999 to go!

      Ima

      • Semeru says

        Jan 31, 2015 at 12:03 am

        This is from wiki

        Lack of evidence supporting autobiographical account

        Shoebat claimed that he threw a bomb at Bank Leumi, an Israeli bank, in Bethlehem. A 2008 Jerusalem Post article raised questions regarding the authenticity of Shoebat’s account, and reported that Bank Leumi had no record of an attack on its Bethlehem branch between 1977 and 1979. In addition, Shoebat’s uncle also denied that such an attack took place. Such an incident was also not reported by Israeli news outlets according to Omar Sacirbey’s 2010 Washington Post article. The Jerusalem Post article reported a contradiction in Shoebat’s response to the question whether word of the bombing made the news at the time. He replied, “I don’t know. I didn’t read the papers because I was in hiding for the next three days.” However, according the same article, he had told Britain’s Sunday Telegraph in 2004 that “I was terribly relieved when I heard on the news later that evening that no one had been hurt or killed by my bomb.” During his telephone interview, Shoebat was unable to recall the date or time of year of the attack. He told the Sunday Telegraph in 2004 that he was pressured by teachers to adopt an extreme Islamic philosophy. His uncle, who still lives in Beit Sahour, said religion did not play a major role in Walid’s education, which he described as ideologically mild, and that there was no attack on Bank Leumi.[1]

        On April 9, 2008, Shoebat responded to the earlier Jerusalem Post’s report on that paper’s op-ed page. He wrote that the Jerusalem Post had been duped. According to him, the sources who disputed his own account of his upbringing (including his relatives) were themselves involved in terrorism. He claimed they want to see him discredited, probably because of his conversion to Christianity. He also claims that reputable witnesses who could confirm the bombing operation of Bank Leumi were not interviewed.[7] He also posted a response on his website.

        On July 13, 2011, CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360° reported an investigative piece into Walid Shoebat’s claim to authority based on being a former terrorist. The report found that according to Israeli government officials, the bank that Walid Shoebat claimed to have attacked, and his own relatives, no record of his supposed terrorist history existed. Another of Shoebat’s claims, that of a two-week term in an Israeli jail, was also unsubstantiated, with Israel having no record he was ever jailed. His cousin, interviewed in the report, stated that he had never known Shoebat to have ties to any movement, and that his claims of being a former terrorist were “for his own personal reasons”. According to CNN, their reporters in the United States, Israel and the Palestinian territories found no evidence to support Shoebat’s claims and “neither Shoebat nor his business partner provided any proof of Shoebat’s involvement in terrorism”.[2]

        Regarding CNN’s inability to confirm his jail time, Shoebat wrote “Even if Mr. Griffin did check prison records, he was searching the wrong name. Had CNN examined our records that were offered to them, it will prove beyond doubt that Mr. Griffin made an error. When Mr. Shoebat was arrested he turned in his U.S. passport and not his birth certificate or I.D. card. His U.S. passport had a different last name.”

        Omar Sacirbey’s 2010 Washington Post article reports that Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American–Islamic Relations, has questioned Shoebat’s motives, saying that “[Ergun] Caner, Shoebat, [Kamal] Saleem along with others like them, belong to an ‘industry’ that is often perpetuated by fundamentalist Christians” and that people are doing this “to make money or get converts or to get some personal benefit”. The article also reports that skeptics have questioned how Shoebat and others have been able to retain US citizenship if their stories of terrorist activities are true.

        Charitable organization status

        The Jerusalem Post also stated that Shoebat has profited from his story that he was formerly a Muslim terrorist who has rejected Islam for Christianity. When the Post asked Shoebat whether the Walid Shoebat Foundation is a registered charity, he said that it was registered in Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Charitable Trusts and Organizations Section said it had no record of such a charity. When asked again, Shoebat claimed it was registered under a different name, but that he was not aware of the Foundation’s registered name, nor any other details, which were known only to his manager. Dr. Joel Fishman of the Allegheny County Law Library in Pennsylvania expressed doubts about Walid Shoebat Foundation’s donation process. He noted that if the money was being given to a registered charity, the charity would have to make annual reports to the state and federal government.

        • Angemon says

          Jan 31, 2015 at 5:57 am

          semeru posted:

          “This is from wiki”

          You? Quoting from wikipedia? OMG, WHAT A SHOCKER!!!

          “Lack of evidence supporting autobiographical account”

          http://shoebat.com/shoebat-foundation/evidence-of-my-credentials/

  5. Angemon says

    Jan 30, 2015 at 10:13 am

    This is the first known suggestion that any of the detainees involved in the exchange may be trying to engage again in militant activity.

    And I doubt it will be the last…

    • Salah says

      Jan 30, 2015 at 10:47 am

      @ Angemon

      “And I doubt it will be the last…”

      …as long as we have a jihadist in the WH, that is.

      Jihadists are terrorists. Terrorists can be crushed and annihilated by the free peoples unless the free peoples themselves are actually ruled by them.
      The enemy *is* in the Oval Office.

    • Spot On says

      Jan 30, 2015 at 12:10 pm

      When our government acts this stupid it is creepy. Follow the money, no one is that stupid. Now hundreds or thousands more will die by this terrorist’s hand. Any two year old could predict this.

  6. pumbar says

    Jan 30, 2015 at 1:41 pm

    Well, if ever there was a story that needed the words “craven, dhimmi, coward” in it, it must be this one surely? Hmmm…

  7. Sam says

    Jan 30, 2015 at 1:50 pm

    WHAT A SURPRISE!! Liberals will still protect our blatant traitor president Obama. So nothing will change. Also so what if terrorists kill few more innocent people as long as our beloved president can play golf and visit Saudis and invite his Muslim Brotherhood friends to white house to fight of terrorism.

    This is unreal. Also shame on all Americans who support this Obama!

  8. Walter Sieruk says

    Jan 30, 2015 at 2:09 pm

    It’s only a matter of time before all the those jihadist thugs of al Qaeda who were released from Gitmo will return to the murderous actions of their jihad for Islam. The psychologists who were sent to Gitmo could in not,in any way, help them or straighten them out and cause them to turn away from the wicked and murderous ways of the jihad. As the ancient poet ,Aristophanes, wrote “The wisest of the wise will never make a crab walk straight.” To explain this in another way, the Bible teaches “That which is crooked cannot be made straight…” Ecclesiastes 1:15. [K.J.V.]

  9. MKG says

    Jan 30, 2015 at 3:54 pm

    This really comes as no surprise to anyone. Many of you may disagree, but we shouldn’t be overly concerned about it for two reasons.
    First, if they do return to jihad, they are fair game. Meaning our forces can kill them in the field. They no longer have the protection as a prisoner.
    Second, if they try to return to jihad they will endure far more scrutiny than our deserter. You don’t just walk up to your old terrorist cell and say, “hi guys, I’m back. Did I miss anything?” The cells trust will have been compromised base upon how much information was gleened from the former detainee at GTMO. If they do return to jihad their role will be less than insignificant. If anything they could be used as propeganda to exemplify there treatment received at GTMO or killed as a trator. It is quite possible we released those particular ones because they have already told us everything, and there is nothing more we can get from them. After that there is no point in keeping them unless you are going to have them shot. But why do that when the active terrorists might do that for you? By releasing them we may have indeed signed their death warrents.

  10. Bezelel says

    Jan 30, 2015 at 5:13 pm

    I tried to post earlier and got 405 error codes repeatedly, I don’t see it out here so I’ll try again.
    I said, I would have released those guys after, After surgically implanting a tracking device with a remote control detonator. If that were done to the remaining prisoners we could release them all.

  11. Elisha says

    Jan 30, 2015 at 6:33 pm

    If the world was NOT falling apart, then God of the Bible would be a liar, which He is not. Jesus Christ clearly exhorts the righteous AND the wicked to keep going:

    “He who is unjust, let him be unjust still; he who is filthy, let him be filthy still; he who is righteous, let him be righteous still; he who is holy, let him be holy still.”- Revelation 22:11

    Everyone, have faith and trust in the Lord:

    “Behold, I have created the blacksmith
    Who blows the coals in the fire,
    Who brings forth an instrument for his work;
    And I have created the spoiler to destroy.
    No weapon formed against you shall prosper,
    And every tongue which rises against you in judgment
    You shall condemn.
    This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord,
    And their righteousness is from Me,”
    Says the Lord. – Isiah 54:16-17

    Behold, You have made my days as handbreadths, And my lifetime as nothing in Your sight; Surely every man at his best is a mere breath. Selah. – Psalm 39:5

    And God will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying. There shall be no more pain, for the former things have passed away. – Revelation 21:4

    Blessed is a man who perseveres under trial; for once he has been approved, he will receive the crown of life which the Lord has promised to those who love Him. – James 1:12

    Amen.

  12. duh_swami says

    Jan 31, 2015 at 6:27 am

    The propagandists were out early telling us these 5 were no threat…it’s even a stupid question…of course they are a threat. They didn’t turn into cupcakes at Gitmo. Being locked up did not lift the obligation to jihad as a duty to Allah.
    And the whole idea that we can trust Qatar to monitor them is a joke.

  13. Vatandas says

    Jan 31, 2015 at 10:26 am

    Why not? I sure that Gitmo didn’t change their Jihadist philosophy, The naivete of some of our “leaders” is dumbfounding.

  14. ninetyninepct says

    Jan 31, 2015 at 11:14 am

    Just an opinion, but it seems to me that if obama was macho enough to grow a beard that he would fit right in with the line up of monkeys in the picture. All they need is trees.

  15. Draki says

    Feb 3, 2015 at 11:17 am

    This was probably planned by DOD and the CIA that the returned detainees would return to Jihad. The trade probably got us some good intel and these guys might have even turned into double agents for us. Returning prisoners to the other side has advantages. Many insurgencies/counter-insurgencies have successfully done this too.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Michael Copeland on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • Dude on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.