• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

“If someone offends the prophet then there is no problem, we can kill him”

Jan 10, 2015 10:12 am By Robert Spencer

cherif kouachi“Whoever curses a Prophet, kill him. Whoever curses my Companions, beat him.” — Muhammad

Muhammad asked: “Who is willing to kill Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?” One of the Muslims, Muhammad bin Maslama, answered, “O Allah’s Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?” When Muhammad said that he would, Muhammad bin Maslama said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab).” Muhammad responded: “You may say it.” Muhammad bin Maslama duly lied to Ka’b, luring him into his trap, and murdered him. (Bukhari 5.59.369)

“A Jewess used to abuse the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and disparage him. A man strangled her till she died. The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) declared that no recompense was payable for her blood.” (Sunan Abu-Dawud 38.4349)

“Paris Killer Cherif Kouachi Gave Interview to TV Channel Before He Died,” by Emmanuelle Saliba, NBC News, January 10, 2015 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Holed up inside a printing factory outside Paris, Cherif Kouachi spoke by phone to a French television network during a seven-hour standoff on Friday with French security forces.

Kouachi and his brother, Said, were later killed in a raid. One hostage inside the plant was freed.

Here is a partial transcript of the interview between Kouachi and Igor Sahiri, a journalist for France’s BFMTV, as translated by NBC News:

Kouachi: We’re telling you that we are the prophet’s defenders peace and blessings be upon him, and that I, Cherif Kouachi, was sent by Yemen’s Al-Qaeda. OK?

Interviewer: OK, OK.

Kouachi: I went there and it was Anwar Al-Awlaki who financed me.

Interviewer: And how long ago was this?

Kouachi: It was before he was killed.

Interviewer: ok, so you came back to France not long ago ?

Kouachi: No, a long time ago…I know the secret service, don’t worry about it. I know very well how I was able to do things well.

Interviewer: Ok, and now there’s only you and your brother?

Kouachi: That’s not your problem.

Interviewer: But do you have people behind you, or not?

Kouachi: That’s not your problem.

Interviewer: Ok, but do you plan to kill again in the name of Allah or not?

Kouachi: Kill who?

Interviewer: I don’t know, I’m asking you the question.

Kouachi: Did we kill civilians during the two days you’ve been looking for us?

Interviewer: You killed journalists.

Kouachi: But did we kill civilians? Civilians or people during the two days that you looked for us? Or people during the two days you’ve been looking for us?

Interviewer: Wait, wait Cherif, Cherif, did you kill this morning?

Kouachi: We are not killers. We are defenders of the prophet, we don’t kill women. We kill no one. We defend the prophet. If someone offends the prophet then there is no problem, we can kill him. We don’t kill women. We are not like you. You are the ones killing women and children in Syria ,Iraq and Afghanistan. This isn’t us. We have an honor code in Islam.

Interviewer: But you just sought revenge here, you killed 12 people.

Kouachi: Yes, because we sought revenge. You just said it well. You said it yourself, we sought revenge….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: blasphemy, Featured, France, free speech Tagged With: Charlie Hebdo, Cherif Kouachi, muhammad


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Ashley says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 10:34 am

    OT: Bill Maher last night:

    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/maher-salman-rushdie-on-islam-when-theres-this-many-bad-apples-orchards-rotten/

    • Jay Boo says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 1:14 pm

      Thanks
      Good one!

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 1:25 pm

      Thanks for posting that link, Ashley.

      Generally excellent stuff from Bill Maher and Salman Rushdie on Maher’s show last night. Maher is one of the very few liberals who actually covers the Jihad in a sane manner. He is also willing to get angry about Jihad—an even greater rarity.

      Moreover, he is willing to defend freedom of speech *without caveats*, and he roundly slammed the insistent calls from so many for self-censorship—either out of cowardice or, even worse, out of a misplaced desire to avoid “offending” touchy Muslims.

    • Mirren10 says

      Jan 11, 2015 at 2:13 pm

      “When there’s this many bad apples, there’s something wrong with the orchard.”

      I just love that.

  2. Sam says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 10:47 am

    I can see clearly from this interview that these killings have nothing to do with ISLAM. We need to find the “REAL” cause of these BRUTAL KILLINGS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE. What do you think?

    • mach37 says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 2:11 pm

      Wrong, Sam. These killings are entirely caused by Islam because the killers believe their acts are in accordance with The Prophet, approved by him; directed by him.

  3. weavo2 says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 10:54 am

    President Bush: Islam is a religion of peace!

    President Obama: Islam is a religion of peace!

    Paris Muslim jihad terrorist thugs: “If someone offends the prophet then there is no problem, we can kill him.”

    Now don’t forget….Islam is a religion of peace!

    • mortimer says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 12:36 pm

      “Revenge”…he said…”the religion of REVENGE”.

    • AnneM says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 4:29 pm

      Rather religion of “pieces.”

  4. Angemon says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 10:56 am

    Kouachi: We are not killers. We are defenders of the prophet, we don’t kill women. We kill no one. We defend the prophet. If someone offends the prophet then there is no problem, we can kill him.

    But, but, but, our religious experts like Obama, Cameron, Hollande or Merkel assured us that this kind of behaviour has noting to do with islam! In fact, we don’t even know the reason for this attack!

    sarc/off

  5. jewdog says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 11:01 am

    Hmmm….Sounds like this may have something to do with Islam. An interesting distinction here: people who insult the prophet are not innocent civilians. They are people who must die. Yup, that’s Sharia. It rhymes with diarrhea.

    • Ashley says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 11:13 am

      LOL!

  6. Danigher says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 11:03 am

    This guy has been spreading hate all over G+… He is a Leb who hates Canada and hates being here; he makes bombs and posts videos of beheadings. He also tells me he has Lebs relatives in police force and he is becoming a pilot to take the west down within their own system.

    He is in South London Ontario sleeper cell (lat 42°56’22.45″N, lon 81°14’45.75″W)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Xf86HmSUAI

    https://plus.google.com/u/0/117706623338716146173/posts

    goes by hussein abbas the Muslim on G+

    • Angemon says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 11:16 am

      Maybe he could get a position in Justin Trudeau’s staff.

      Why not report him to the police?

      • Danigher says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 11:23 am

        are you new? yes lets sit in our homes and call other people to help us because we are too afraid to help ourselves…

        you call the cops, see how far you get 😉

        • Angemon says

          Jan 10, 2015 at 11:42 am

          Danigher posted:

          “yes lets sit in our homes and call other people to help us because we are too afraid to help ourselves…”

          Huh, isn’t that what you’re trying to do? If not, what’s the advantage of expressing your concerns on JihadWatch rather than to the proper authorities?

          “you call the cops, see how far you get 😉”

          If you’re afraid that the police will overlook or dismiss your concerns, try the media. Sun TV usually doesn’t abide by political correctness.

      • Danigher says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 11:55 am

        where are you?

        • Angemon says

          Jan 10, 2015 at 12:11 pm

          Danigher posted:

          “where are you?”

          Not in Canada. Europe.

  7. Charli Main says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 11:05 am

    Its impossible to argue or reason with the criminally insane and that’s what these Muslim Jihadists are. Just put them down like the mad dogs they are and be done with it.

  8. Salah says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 11:10 am

    Kouachi: “We don’t kill women. We are not like you.”

    What does he mean by that? does he mean that those who kill women are…the lowest of the low???

    As Robert mentioned in this article, Muhammad DID indeed kill women.
    Hmmm, so what Kouachi, the lowest of the low, is basically saying is that Muhammad (who killed women) is actually LOWER than the lowest of the low!!!

    Muhammad the Assassin
    http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2012/03/assassin-english.html

    • Ashley says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 1:54 pm

      Kouachi: “We don’t kill women. We are not like you.”
      ________________________________

      Really, Koulachi? You don’t kill women?

      I beg to differ…

      http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2015/01/09/erin-intv-bramly-cousin-paris-terror-victim.cnn

  9. weavo2 says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 11:19 am

    “We have an honor code in Islam.”

    🙂

    • Jay Boo says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 1:12 pm

      In the West, little kindergarten girls get a gold star if they perform the best.

      In Islam they get a marriage proposal from the perv prophet lusting for sex.

  10. duh_swami says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 11:22 am

    You insult the ‘prophet’ and you’re toast…The future must not belong to you, and your slander…Anyone who believes in Allah and his Messenger can put you down for your transgressions…
    The best thing to do then, is never trust anyone who believes in Allah and his messenger, and stay as far away from them as you can get. If they come to you, arm yourself, and don’t make any sudden moves.

    • mortimer says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 1:20 pm

      Obama unknowingly endorsed vigilante killing of blasphemers. Clueless.

      • Mirren10 says

        Jan 11, 2015 at 2:16 pm

        I seriously doubt it was *unknowingly*.

  11. CDN highlander says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 11:22 am

    Telling interview from a mental dwarf who follows the teachings of Mohammed PBUH (pork be upon him), a 6th century barbarian pedophile criminal who wrote a story book. Nice!

  12. duh_swami says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 11:47 am

    The Prophet must die…again…Since he is bullet proof he has to be killed by ridicule, insult, disparagement, castigation, naked cartoon…all in good fun of course. Once he becomes the object of general scorn, he will die. No one will believe in him anymore.

    • mortimer says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 1:21 pm

      The smug gangsta culture of the young jihadists is the problem.

  13. katnis says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 11:59 am

    The transcript doesn’t make sense. It’s not logical. Very fitting for the ‘religion of peace.’

    • St. Croix says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 1:16 pm

      It is difficult to think like them! However, I think when he says he didn’t and doesn’t kill anyone, he could be getting that from the Qu’ran:

      From my limited understanding of their writings, he (they) are not seeing themselves as killers…i.e. “they” are not doing it. ALLAH is the one who “kills for them” when they put themselves forward as his tools–they are the hands and bodies just being used by Allah. Doesn’t the Koran say as much in this verse?

      surah 8:17: And you did not kill them, but it was Allah who killed them. And you threw not, [O Muhammad], when you threw, but it was Allah who threw that He might test the believers with a good test. Indeed, Allah is Hearing and Knowing.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 2:55 pm

        Very true, St. Croix. That is exactly the Islamic “thought” process.

    • mortimer says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 1:22 pm

      Kouachi is speaking in shorthand as he quotes a series of complicated and contradictory Islamic doctrines.

  14. Dave J says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 12:01 pm

    Its National Draw a Picture of the Prophet Day!

    Mine would be a male version of the multi-armed Hindu God Kali, with each arm brandishing a different weapon (AK-47, sword, errant vehicle, etc.). With a scruffy beard, dead eyes and wearing a “Religion of Peace” T-shirt.

    • St. Croix says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 1:17 pm

      Give it a go!

      • mortimer says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 1:33 pm

        Or pay an artist to draw it.

    • Cicero says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 3:53 pm

      Now why would you want to do that ? I.e. Draw a cartoon of the god-dess Kali? Are you not afraid of the billion Hindus worldwide who would immediately start. Killing artists and cartoonists for insulting their goddess.

      Have there not been hundreds ( if not thousands ) of terrorist atracks by Hindus against non- Hindus who insult their goddess Kali?

      Now there is a thought!

    • Know Thy Enemy says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 3:54 pm

      Draw a picture all you want, but I will really appreciate if you refrain from insulting Hindu gods/goddesses by associating them in any way with that evil pedophile!

  15. Jimbo says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 12:03 pm

    i dont get it folks !!!

    we still dont know what their cause or intentions were.?? what was the real reason for their attacks.

    it cant have anything to do with Islam. none of this stuff ever does. anyway islam is the religion of peace, so how could it have anything to do with these barbaric murders of innocent people going about thier lives ?? so its not islam. could be buddhist inspired… i just dont know. maybe those nasty jews again or naughty hindus ( with all that yoga and deep breathing and all )

    how do i know????? well Barack tells me none of this has anything to do with islam. so it must be true. And so does Mr Cameron, Angie baby Merkel, Frenchie Holland and just about any other snivelling conniving political leader out there. all of them have no gut or balls. past leaders of their respective countries will be turning in their grave.

    think Abe Lincoln, Winston Churchill , Napoleon Bonaparte etc.

  16. Walter Sieruk says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 12:15 pm

    The words of the statement in the title of the above article shows the this jihad minded Muslim had be thoroughly brainwashed. Brainwashed and dangerous. That he must had really believed in that Islamic ,anti-Western junk should be enough to expose the total falseness of the saying “It doesn’t matter what you believe as long as your sincere.” What nonsense !

  17. zulu says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 12:28 pm

    OT

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVwfoAl7GSM
    Ezra Levant – Eric Brazau jailed 1 year for hating Islam

  18. Ashley says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 12:33 pm

    Whoa….

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/hamyd-mourad-released-without-charge-after-being-named-as-suspect-in-charlie-hebdo-attack-9969843.html

    Weren’t there THREE attackers? Where the hell is the third one?????

  19. Jay Boo says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 1:06 pm

    GUILT
    Muhammad was afraid to have anyone curse his name.

    Muhammad never knew true peace and was always full of fear.
    He was afraid of the righteous voices of angels that condemned his evil ways and told him repeatedly to — repent, repent, repent.
    He feared that he would never be allowed into Paradise and would be tormented in his grave.
    He was also afraid of his guilty conscience that cursed him nightly before he slept.

  20. mortimer says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 1:11 pm

    Kouachi: “We are not killers. We are defenders ”

    Of course! An executioner is not a killer…only in a technical sense. Yes, they were vigilante executioners for Allah sent by Al Qaeda.

    And Islam has nothing to do with Islam. However, the cat’s out of the bag! President Sisi of Egypt asked, ‘Why are we antagonizing the world…do we want to kill 7 billion people?’

  21. Truth says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 1:25 pm

    The Muslim prophet Mohammad was an evil child molester ( he married a 6 year old little girl), and is an evil supporter of slavery. Nobody should follow him anywhere.

  22. Jay Boo says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 1:32 pm

    Poetic Justice

    Were they shot be female police?
    Were the bullets pork laced and bought from Jihawg Ammo?

    http://www.ammoland.com/2013/06/peace-through-pork-jihawg-defensive-ammunition/#axzz3ORcXNLv8

  23. bobm says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 1:38 pm

    oh yes … in ONE instance ; this man was indeed a prophet… he prophesied his own death at the hand of an offended Jewess… try the lamb she said… he… thinking this whole thing was about him… died in agony for days… try the real Good LAMB muslim… and be saved ..your prophet has his reward.

  24. Arjay says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 1:51 pm

    One thing I have been disgusted by in the PC and leftist response to the multiple attacks in France (the magazine office, the Kosher Grocery, the execution of the black policewoman from Martinique)… is the numerous excuses that justified the slaughter committed by (what else) Muslims.

    One idiot on twitter mentioned that this was payback for the French trying to keep their colony of Haiti after the slave revolt began (which would result in an independent Haiti). France tried to keep Haitian slaves over 200 years ago… so now in the present 21st century it is what???? Okay for Muslims to slaughter French citizens and residents who NEVER OWNED A SLAVE. Including a BLACK WOMAN FROM MARTINIQUE.

    Oh, and the historical event the moron was referring too… wasn’t just “keep the slaves” it was also an attempt to rescue the French AND THE BI-RACIAL COLONIALS AND FULL-BLOOD AFRICAN BLACKS WHO WERE “FREE PEOPLE OF COLOR.” All three groups included members who were slave holders… and many who were not.

    Thousands of white French (including elderly, children, pregnant women and infants) were slaughtered in the uprising. So, any French participating in colonial life that was pre-independence Haiti lost their “white privilege” over two centuries ago.

    No need for modern day French to “pay for those actions.”

    And to show how ignorant this moron was… guess what he left out about Haiti. The oldest “Black ruled nation” in the Western Hemisphere… STILL HAS SLAVERY. This was exposed in the aftermath of the earthquake a few years back.

    Slavery NEVER LEFT HAITI. Blacks owned other blacks in Colonial Era Haiti. And in the 200 plus years since thousands of white French and bi-racial French were slaughtered and many more fled… Blacks continue to own blacks as slaves in Haiti.

    Then there is the whining that France was a big bad colonial power in North Africa. And therefore… France SHOULD LET MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS ENTER FRANCE AND LIVE ON WELFARE.

    WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP.

    i myself am an American Indian with Hispanic and Irish bloodlines as well. All three heritages have experienced “colonialism.” This may shock the Leftist PC worshipers but not all colonial experiences are the same.

    Some were brutal… others saved the indigenous cultures from extinction (such as what was going on with Easter Island)… oh, and at times whites were victims of colonialism- sometimes by other whites and sometimes by other groups of non-whites. And sometimes whites were victims of…

    piracy, rape, arson, murder and slave traders.

    This was what was going on with the European nations with coastlines along the Mediterranean. The Barbary states (Muslims) had for generations raided and raped and pillaged white European peoples; even getting as far as Ireland where the Muslims destroyed robbed and burned. Thousands of white Europeans were taken into slavery by the Muslims.

    Not only were white women raped… but so were men. Many European men and boys were forced to do menial tasks during the day on Muslim pirate ships and at night experienced sodomy.

    This all stopped when Europeans COLONIZED NORTH AFRICA. When colonialism happened… IT SAVED LIVES… IT PREVENTED RAPE… IT PREVENTED MURDER… IT PREVENTED SLAVERY.

    COLONIALISM SAVED LIVES. Now, as an American Indian saying this… please watch leftists heads explode.

    Now were the Europeans VENGEFUL? NO THEY WERE NOT. Instead of seeking vengeance… the Europeans developed their North African colonies… providing an infrastructure, building hospitals, schools and roads…. developing natural resources and water supplies…. protecting women and did their best to bring North Africa into the modern world.

    Oh, and notice how the leftists who blame “European racism and colonialism” as an excuse for North African Muslims to act like barbaric savages in Europe.

    Well, why do these leftists FORGET one of the most brutal and evil forced expulsions in the history of humanity. After the creation of Israel… the expulsion of North African Jews. At least those who could be expelled. Remember many North Africans Jews were beaten, raped and murdered and never did flee to Israel. Hard to do that when your a corpse.

    With the North African Muslims having such a vile legacy of Jew hatred… the Europeans should have never let ANY OF THEM (Muslims) into Europe.

    So… Muslim violence in France is justified because of Haitian slavery over 200 years ago… and Muslim violence in France is justified because of North African colonialism.

    Both excuses are being promoted by dhimmi leftist apologists for Islamic terror. Both excuses are lies and as you read above… are absolutely a FALSE NARRATIVE.

    • Sam Hawkins says

      Jan 11, 2015 at 12:31 am

      Thank you for this heart-felt and thought-provoking comment.

  25. profitsbeard says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 2:11 pm

    Those traitorous homicidal maniacs who claim an ‘extra-legal’ right to kill people who offend their ideology SHOULD BE SHOT ON SIGHT.

    They are openly declaring themselves as traitorous murderous lunatics. KILL THEM.

    Or am I being too rational?

  26. mach37 says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 2:17 pm

    Muddled logic, illogical reasoning: first they say they are not killers, then immediately they say that they killed in revenge for insulting the prophet. They then tell how Muhammed approved of revenge killing. Revenge promotes peace, eh.

    • Arthur says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 11:41 pm

      Allow me to speculate on the “active” Muslim mindset and how they might be viewing the world.

      People who offend Islam are not people anymore–they are lower than animals, like disease, parasites, insect pests, or mold growing in your refrigerator (kafir). There is no consideration for them, only the need to clean the earth of them, like pollution in a river or garbage in the ditch. Those who act in jihad consider themselves to be a conduit of Allah’s will, and do not consider their actions as coming from themselves at all. They have no responsibility for their actions, it is all very clearly the will of Allah, which is clearly articulated in the Koran. Just like if you were on a prisoner chain gang cleaning the garbage out of a ditch in Louisiana–you are told what to do and you would be punished for doing anything else, it is not your will. “Killing” refers to killing of other Muslims due to personal arguments (Abdul poisoned my well, so I’m going to go kill him). I don’t think they consider clearing the earth of infidels as killing at all–to them it would have the connotation of “cleaning” or “purifying”.

      It seems illogical to us mainly because we are not using the same dictionary as these people. Basic words have different meanings for them. We are very different societies and they do not wish to become like us or to think like us. They make no effort to understand our point of view–it would be like a devout person afraid to learn pagan beliefs in the fear that they would lose their way.

      I think if people could realize these fundamental differences, then they could understand how a Muslim view of ‘Peace’ is nothing at all like a non-Muslim’s conception of peace. “Discourse” is useless when the language is misunderstood. It’s ‘Lost in Translation’.

      Bottom line, I don’t think we’re going to rationally negotiate this problem away like some happy ending fiction. Physical action may be the only language we have in common.

  27. somehistory says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 2:17 pm

    Reading over his speech to the reporter, one can see just what happens in the mosques, the madrassas, the homes of devout muslims:”
    “Little ahmed, one and one is thirteen, one and one is thirteen. if a lying infidel tells you one and one is two, do not listen, but kill the infidel for insulting the prophet…(pineapples become umbrella handles)…one and one is thirteen, one and one is thirteen. Kill the infidel who insults the prophet with the lie that one and one is two.’
    “yes, father. one and one is thirteen. I will kill infidels who lie and tell me one and one is two.”
    ***************************************************************************************************************************
    Who they kill and when they kill all depends on their twisted definitions of words and their lack of any truth in their hearts or minds or souls. Their minds have been abused with constant lies and they refuse to be disabused of those lies.

  28. abad says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 2:39 pm

    Considering the fact there is no concrete evidence that Muhammad exists outside the Quran (and chances are in pagan Arabia, Muhammad was a common name) in other books nor archaeological proof – killing in the name of a probably non-existent individual is well a sign of

    MENTAL ILLNESS

  29. Danigher says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 2:46 pm

    This is example of what we are dealing with in Southwestern Ontario Canada….Law abiding video game players by day, little jihads by night…

    hussein abbas the Muslim on G+:

    heres hussein abbas the Muslim @ 1:14-1:30

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Le_2OS-VVrA

    Know by TheBajanCanadian on YouTube

    Check him out doing the IBC, what a conscientious little jihad

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3XyjcAkPCRY

    ref:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Xf86HmSUAI

  30. Paul G says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 2:51 pm

    http://www.dailytimes.com.ng/article/child-suicide-bomber-kills-least-16-nigeria

  31. Bezelel says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 3:24 pm

    Telling the truth about the character moHAMed is an insult. They just want us all to shut up and let them do whatever they want. islam is an insult to humanity. A little righteous indignation is well over due. Tolerance for the intolerant is not the way to go.

    • AnneM says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 4:27 pm

      In the age of the internet, that being told to “shut up”, will, let’s just say NOT WORK. On the internet things have a way of going viral.

      • Bezelel says

        Jan 11, 2015 at 1:25 pm

        The march in France looks virulent, I’m hoping they don’t let up.

  32. Champ says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 3:38 pm

    “If someone offends the prophet then there is no problem, we can kill him”

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    muslims have been fed this lie all of their lives, and the evil truth about muhammad is far from their minds–resulting in heartless, soulless slaves for allah.

    And allah is NOT the God of the Bible:

    http://kingmessiahproject.com/is_allah_not_God.html

    • forrest says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 4:16 pm

      And by that logic, if they offend us, we may kill them? Awesome! I’m offended every time they open their mouths with this garbage.

      • occupant 9 says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 5:45 pm

        That would be my take as well, but that would be also denying that Muslims are “the best of people” too.

        I’m offended that Islam considers me worthy of death JUST for being free; I don’t even have to do anything special.

        So, since I don’t have to do anything special to be a target for Muslims, I might as well say the truth that the pedophile prophet Mohammad contributed nothing that was good to the world, except his own death.

    • mortimer says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 6:26 pm

      Sharia law authorizes EVERY Muslim (i.e. over one billion) to commit vigilante murders of blasphemers.

      For that reason, Kouachi and his cohorts are Islamic heroes.

      Any Muslims who says he doesn’t admire their courage is lying to you…taqiyya.

      …or else that person is no longer a real Muslim.

  33. Paul says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 3:51 pm

    Perhaps it was not Muhammad who was the first Islamic “extremist” but Muhammad al-Bukhari.

  34. ipfreely says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 3:56 pm

    islam is not a religion of peace,it’s a religion of submission..submission is what islam is..
    muhammad was a pedophile,necrophilia,Zoophilia, homosexual,rapist,and killer..

  35. dlbrand says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 4:20 pm

    Excellent. Good work, Guys, (Robert , marc…),

    You all found online available portions of Qadi Iyad’s invaluable Ash-Shifa.

    (Last time I searched for such, all I found was an abridged rendition of the book, which lacked both Sections Three and Four.)

    Thank you all for both finding and posting the link to, at least, an available online rendition of Section Four.

    For those unfamiliar with this Handbook on the so-called prophet of Islam, his claimed qualities and the honor claimed due to the man, this book (Qadi Iyad’s Ash-Shifa) is (as provided in the Biographical Note section of Reliance of the Traveler, p. 1089), “universally acknowledged as one of the finest works ever written on the Prophet.”

    Because, as stated on the hard-copy’s back-cover, “As-Shifa gathers together all that is necessary to acquaint the reader with the true stature of the Prophet.” With that done, Qadi Iyad then declares “the esteem and respect which is due to him [the prophet].” And with the done, step by step he spells out clearly “the verdict regarding anyone who does not fulfil [sic] what his stature demands or who attempts to denigrate his supreme status–even by as much as a nail pairing.” (Ash-Shifa, BackCover.) And Iyad even provides narratives of examples of those verdicts deliverer.

    What’s more, as likewise asserted on the hard-copy’s back-cover of this work, it is so “highly admired throughout the Muslim world,” it has earned a sanctity of its own.

    Thus, it is said of it, “If Ash-Shifa is found in a house, this house will not suffer any harm,… when a sick person reads it or it is recited (yes, the Handbook, like Muhammad’s Qur’an, is also memorized and recited by believers) to him, Allah s.w.t. will restore his health.” (Ibid.)

    On the author’s qualifications: Qadi Iyad was “Imam of his time in hadith and its science.” Known for being “tenacious in truth.” Multiple times, he was awarded, by his peers—the leading shaykhs, scholar, instructors of the din–the award of ijaz, which is, in brief, the award certifying one is qualified to teach others, in this case, teach Islam. (Biographical Note on the Author of the Shifa, P 510.)

    Because Iyad got it, understood it, had Islam down pat, we could say.

    Therefore, worth all taking note when Iyad asserts as follows:

    The rights of the Prophet and the devotion, respect, esteem and honour [sic] that are owed to him are made clear in the Book and the Sunnah and the consensus of the community. In His Book, Allah has made it haram to harm him. The community agree that anyone among the Muslims who disparages him or curses him is to be killed.

    (Muhammad Messenger of Allah, Ash-Shifa [Kitab Ash-shifa ta ‘rif huquq al-Mustafa, (Healing by the recognition of the Rights of the Chosen One)], of Qadi ‘Iyad Ibn Musa al-Yasubi; Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley translation, Medinah Press, Cape Town, South Africa, Seventh print, 2008, 1429H, P. 371.)

    What in this world is Iyad saying…..????? For once, I wish he would just speak clearly …

    • occupant 9 says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 5:54 pm

      Surely we could find a prominent Leftist to translate the above into “butterflies, pancakes and ponies” so we could avoid the crux of the matter?

      Maybe “striking at their necks” actually is code for haircut, not too long in the back, except that the tools used take this from barbering to barbarism? An honest mistake, no?

      • Scott Allen says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 8:32 pm

        Nice! Very funny! I’ll ask my barber for that next time….good thing he’s Italian and not a Muzzie.

      • dlbrand says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 8:57 pm

        “Surely we could find a prominent Leftist to translate the above into ‘butterflies, pancakes and ponies’ so we could avoid the crux of the matter?

        “Maybe ‘striking at their necks’ actually is code for haircut, not too long in the back, except that the tools used take this from barbering to barbarism? An honest mistake, no?”

        Indeed.

        And the following is code for “When people find fault with our prophet and his din; have them over for lunch, organize interfaith meetings; and you Muslims yourselves, point out and condemn the murderous history, practice, and pattern of our prophet and his companions”:

        “Know that all who curse Muhammad, may Allah bless and grant him peace, or blame him or attribute imperfection to him in his person, his linage, his deen or any of his qualities, or alludes to that or its like by any means whatsoever, whether in the form of a curse or contempt or belittling him or detracting from him or finding fault with him or maligning him, the judgment regarding such a person is the same as the judgement [sic] against anyone who curses him. He is killed as we shall make clear. This judgement [sic] extends to anything which amounts to a curse or disparagement. We have no hesitation concerning this matter, be it a clear statement or allusion.

        The same applies to anyone who curses him, invokes against him, desires to harm him, ascribes to him what does not befit his position or jokes about his mighty affairs with foolish talk, satire, disliked words or lies, or reviles him….All of this is the consensus of the ulama and the imams of fatwa from the time of the Companions until today.” (Ash-Shifa, Qadi Iyad, P. 373.)

  36. Rich Smith says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 4:21 pm

    Why do Muslims lie when the truth is self evident from their scriptures?

    Third World mentality of a third World religion!

    • occupant 9 says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 5:56 pm

      We’re not supposed to know what’s in their “holy” books. We’re just supposed to be on the receiving end and be grateful for the humiliation.

  37. gravenimage says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 4:26 pm

    Kouachi: Did we kill civilians during the two days you’ve been looking for us?

    Interviewer: You killed journalists.

    Kouachi: But did we kill civilians? Civilians or people during the two days that you looked for us? Or people during the two days you’ve been looking for us?
    ……………………………………

    I’d previously heard the claim made by these Jihadists that they had not killed any civilians.

    This just shows how meaningless this is—any Infidel would consider cartoonists, writers, and journalists to be civilians, as well as the Jewish employees and shoppers at the Kosher supermarket who they would go on to kill. Most would characterize the non-military police officers killed as civilians, as well.

    But not for pious Muslims. Anyone who dares “insult the ‘Prophet'”—or, really, criticize Islam in any way—is not considered a civilian. Anyone—like these police officers—whose job it is in part to protect Infidels from violent Jihad are not considered civilians. And, of course, any Jew is as a matter of course considered a special ‘enemy of Islam’.

    More:

    Interviewer: Wait, wait Cherif, Cherif, did you kill this morning?

    Kouachi: We are not killers. We are defenders of the prophet, we don’t kill women. We kill no one. We defend the prophet. If someone offends the prophet then there is no problem, we can kill him. We don’t kill women. We are not like you. You are the ones killing women and children in Syria ,Iraq and Afghanistan. This isn’t us. We have an honor code in Islam.
    ……………………………………

    This is, in part, the idea noted by several posters above, that it is Allah who kills, and that he is simply using pious Muslims like the Kouachi brothers as his tools.

    It is also the idea that they can use any means to “defend the ‘Prophet'”, and that the killing is somehow incidental.

    Also, they say they don’t kill women, but they murdered a police woman—I’m not sure if women were among the victims at Charlie Hebdo or among those at the Kosher market, but it is likely.

    But they probably don’t consider these women to be women, since they were—in the minds of Jihadists, anyway—avowed ‘enemies’ of Islam.

    So note that their “honor code” allows the butchering of virtually any Infidel—as well, of course, of any Muslim deemed “heretical” or “apostate”.

    And the idea, of course, that civilized Infidels target women and children is an utter lie. Instead, Muslims regularly use women and children as human shields.

    More:

    Interviewer: But you just sought revenge here, you killed 12 people.

    Kouachi: Yes, because we sought revenge. You just said it well. You said it yourself, we sought revenge….
    ……………………………………

    And what elicits Muslim “revenge”? “Insulting the ‘Prophet'”, of course, or daring to point out how violent Islam is, or defending other Infidels against violent Jihad, or being Jewish, or openly asserting that one is a Christian or other non-Muslim…the list goes on and on, and in full blush, can include virtually anyone any given Jihadist has decided is a legitimate target.

    A disturbing—but very instructive—glimpse into the ‘mind’ of a murderous Jihadist.

    • occupant 9 says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 6:02 pm

      He’s effectively saying our safety relies on his ilk’s self-restraint or tardy revenge. Either way and every way, Muslim immigration on any level is one helluva risk for a free society to take.

    • Ashley says

      Jan 11, 2015 at 10:35 am

      Yes, Graven. Elsa Cayat was killed at the magazine. She was the only female victim, and there is speculation she was singled out because she was Jewish:

      http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2015/01/09/erin-intv-bramly-cousin-paris-terror-victim.cnn

  38. Angry says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 6:45 pm

    It appears that muslims, in France especially, fear a backlash from the infidel; or kufar; and rightly so!.

    Now they they’re getting to know what its like for the minority Christians (inc. Copts), Jews. in what the muslim will call their land; where only islam dominates and controls

    Isn’t ‘karma’ great, keep it up.

    • Oliver says

      Jan 11, 2015 at 7:35 am

      No, surely we in the west can be better than that? We should support those Muslims who genuinely love the western countries where they live and practice a peaceful version of the religion.

      • Angemon says

        Jan 11, 2015 at 9:22 am

        Oliver posted:

        “a peaceful version of the religion.”

        Just a small remark: there’s no peaceful version of the religion. I think the ahmadi forsake offensive jihad and are allowed to live in non-muslim majority lands and abide by the law of the land if it doesn’t interfere with their religious freedom, but that’s as close as it gets.

    • Oliver says

      Jan 11, 2015 at 7:37 am

      For example, one of the cops who died was Muslim – he died shooting at the killers to try to stop them. They shot hit back injuring him and then came up and shot him dead point blank. His bosses said he was a good policeman, very committed to his job.

  39. John says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 7:00 pm

    I have a suggestion. It will have some pushback. The Bill of Rights, namely the First Amendment, guarantees freedom of religion. I do not consider Islam a religion. It is a form of government that hides behind the mask of religion. It preaches the murder of infidels – those who are not Muslim. It also preaches the subjugation of others, especially women. This sounds more like Nazism. The people of the United States should push for an amendment to the Constitution of the United States that defines religion in general. All fifty states should do the same in their state constitutions. As I have stated, it would have opposition, but I believe it is possible. Such an amendment would not only put Islam on a leash, but I would curb some the other crazy cults that use the term “religion” and claim they can break the law “in the name of God”.

    • Arthur says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 10:59 pm

      Honestly, I think we should go for a constitutional amendment which outlaws the practice of Islam as an “ideology” which has irreconcilably declared itself an enemy of our (US) constitutional government. The punishment would be loss of freedom (and lifelong separation of men from women and children). Islam needs singling out–this is the adaptive capability that our government has which Islam cannot circumvent. Enforcement could proceed at discretion, but it would completely unfetter the government to stop Muslim immigration and round up the rock-throwing hordes. 3/4 of state legislatures would need to vote in support of the amendment. No federal body (congress, supreme court, president) would be able to block it under our constitution once approved by the states.

  40. Foxtrap says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 7:05 pm

    If this offends anyone, tough. But the truth is, is that Islam’s “prophet” is a disciple of Satan. Pure and simple. No other religious document espouses as much evil as the Koran. And that is the truth, no matter how you slice it.

    • John says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 8:31 pm

      I totally agree. If you look at the history of Islam, it is a “fill the void religion”. The Arabs didn’t have a religion of their own. They didn’t like Christianity and they hated the Jews, so they created their own, like the Frankenstein Monster. Although I have stated in a previous post that Islam is more of a government than a religion, it does have the characteristics of a perverted men’s club – selling women, multiple wives, etc. (subjugation). As a matter of fact the so-called prophet was a known pervert and pedophile.

  41. Ramon says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 7:36 pm

    :just read THE PROPHET OF DOOM LAST NIGHT, AVAILABLE ONLINE….fascinating read…it is brilliant…helps a great deal to understand the lunacy that is Islam…

    I am sooo fed up with this defending the prophet stuff…oh, pleeeaaase!

    • Paul says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 7:42 pm

      And I’m fed up with the news media (like CNN) referring to him as “The Prophet Muhammad,” as though we all acknowledge he is a prophet. If they want to be polite, why don’t they just say the Islamic prophet Muhammad?

      • pumbar says

        Jan 11, 2015 at 12:42 am

        That really annoys me too.

        • foxtrapper says

          Jan 11, 2015 at 8:53 am

          or, perhaps, the Satanic disciple Mohammad….which he is/was.

      • Kepha says

        Jan 11, 2015 at 9:17 pm

        Ditto, Paul. As a Christian who takes seriously the last several verses in Revelation (oops, sorry to some of our sophisticated militant godless out there–I forgot that, being a fundamentalist, I’m supposed to call it Revyoolashuns) seriously, I don’t see Muhammad as a prophet, but as a dreadful deceiver. Further, I’m sick of the PeeCee types who expect us all to recognize the appellation “THE prophet” as referring to Old Mo.

  42. Younus says

    Jan 11, 2015 at 4:10 am

    The hypocrisy of “If someone offends the prophet then there is no problem, we can kill him” is the fact that the prophet himself was going around insulting people when he began his preaching:
    “When the apostle openly displayed Islam as God ordered him his people did not withdraw or turn against him, so far as I have heard, until he spoke disparagingly of their gods. When he did that they took great offence and resolved unanimously to treat him as an enemy… They said, ‘O Abu Talib, your nephew has cursed our gods, insulted our religion, mocked our way of life and accused our forefathers of error; either you must stop him or you must let us get at him.”
    From: THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD. A TRANSLATION OF ISHAQ’S SIRAT RASUL ALLAH WITH INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY A. GUILLAUME

  43. Real says

    Jan 11, 2015 at 12:36 pm

    Islam is a political system that includes a bit of religion (theocracy).
    Political systems are defined by their laws.
    Sharia is the political law defining islam.
    Some say sharia punishments are harsh, but that is debateable.

    The REAL issue is what sharia defines as crime, and thus what is punished harshly:
    1) getting raped: If you dont have 4 muslim male witness willing to testify you are charged with adultery and punished harshly.
    2) being non-muslim and refusing to pay jizya: if you do not want to be a slave (and that’s the intent of jizya…to extract all wealth above subsitance level, same as any slave owner does). If you don’t pay, or don’t convert to islam, you are punished with death.
    3) leaving islam: someone born to a muslim who excersizes free thought and concludes islam is false is punished with death…it is required under sharia.
    4) saying anything a muslim does not like: if a muslim does not like you or something you say, they shout blasphemy and you are to be executed under sharia.

    Listing 100 more ridiculous sharia-crimes the are punished harshly in islam will be no problem, but I would like any muslim to explain the justice in these 4 first.

    If you can not, yet to persist in following islam then you are either stupid, evil, or a coward.
    You will have proven that…

    sharia is:

    Slavery
    Hatred
    Inequality
    Terrorism

    • Know Thy Enemy says

      Jan 11, 2015 at 1:13 pm

      “…..but I would like any muslim to explain the justice in these 4 first.”

      I have asked Muslims many times, to show me the justice in pretty much the same points that you wrote here, and their response almost always is- Since this system is made/prepared by Allah himself, it can only be justice! Of course they don’t say this outright, but after all the lies, obfuscations, and circus-logics, this is what it boils down to!

      Here is one man who explicitly states this (link below). Watch the 4 min video and see how many normal, everyday Muslims disagree with him-

  44. Al says

    Jan 12, 2015 at 7:13 pm

    Wow, could this freak be any uglier?

  45. OUL says

    Jan 19, 2015 at 4:08 pm

    WE MUSLIM IN THE WORLD,

    WE MUST KEEP THE WORLD IN PEACE. WE CANNOT KILL IN THE NAME OF NOBODY. LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL. WE LIVE ONCE AND WE MUST BE HAPPY IN THIS
    LIFE.
    FORGIVE THE ONES WHO DOES NOT FOLLOW YOUR IDEAS.
    MAKE PEACE TO EVERYBODY.
    THANK YOU I LOVE YOU !!!!

  46. OUL says

    Jan 19, 2015 at 4:12 pm

    LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL WE JUST LIVE ONCE AND WE NEED TO BE HAPPY AND POSITIVE IN THIS WORLD. MAKE PEACE.

    DO NOT PAY ATTENTION TO THOSE WHO OFFENDED YOU. LIFE IS SIMPLE.

    MAKE PEACE THANK YOU I LOVE YOU

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Michael Copeland on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • Dude on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.