• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Islamic State executes women for refusing temporary marriage

Jan 25, 2015 8:51 am By Robert Spencer

Temporary marriage is an established Shi’ite concept. Shi’ites justify temporary marriage, mutah, by their reading of Qur’an 4:24:

And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. Lawful unto you are all beyond those mentioned, so that ye seek them with your wealth in honest wedlock, not debauchery. And those of whom ye seek content (by marrying them), give unto them their portions as a duty. And there is no sin for you in what ye do by mutual agreement after the duty (hath been done). Lo! Allah is ever Knower, Wise.

They see in this marriage as something contracted by means of payment (“give them their portions”) for a specified time by mutual agreement.

However, it is also found among Sunnis. We have seen it in Egypt, and it has been reported as also rising among Saudis.

“IS Executes Women in Mosul For Refusing Temporary Marriage,” Basnews, January 25, 2015 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

The Islamic State (IS) militants have executed seven women in Mosul for refusing temporary marriage, or ‘nikah’.

Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) official from Mosul Saed Mamuzini told BasNews that IS are demanding women accept nikah with insurgents. Nikah is a temporary marriage which permits the participants to have sex.

“Many women refuse to have sex with IS militants, in which cases they are arrested. The militants often kill them,” said Mamuzini.

“Today [Saturday] seven women from Mosul were killed at the IS base of Ghazlan,” he added.

Mamuzini claimed that these women had refused to enter in nikah with IS insurgents.

IS tell women that if they have sex with IS insurgents within the contract of nikah, it will be considered jihad for women.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, Daesh), women's rights in Islam Tagged With: nikah, temporary marriage


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Angemon says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 9:31 am

    Prostitution is illegal and they kill women who refuse to have sex for money.

    The islamic state shouldn’t be bombed back to the stone age, it should be nuked of the gene pool.

    • cs says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 9:34 am

      They are already in the stone age man, with some odd technology surrounding them, but mentally, they are already there.

      • Porky The Crusader says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 9:55 am

        It’s an insult to the stone age cavemen because i believe they were far more advanced than the korananimals of today. Anyway i understand your drift.

    • voegelinian says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 1:53 pm

      That would be like eliminating a recent, visible outbreak of termites, and only the visible outbreak, while leaving the larger source of that problem unaddressed.

      • Angemon says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 3:42 pm

        voegelinian posted:

        “That would be like eliminating a recent, visible outbreak of termites, and only the visible outbreak, while leaving the larger source of that problem unaddressed.”

        Hi voeg. I’m surprised to hear from you. I though you weren’t bothering to read my posts:

        http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/01/saudi-king-abdullah-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-1185295

        “voegelinian says

        January 23, 2015 at 6:35 pm

        I hope Angemon isn’t under the impression that I bother to read his posts anymore…”

        In any case, what would the source of the problem be? I’m asking this because last time I checked you ignored islam and choose to focus on muslims alone, while sneering at counter-jihadis who actively targeted islam.

        • Peggy says

          Jan 25, 2015 at 9:45 pm

          There are only Muslims in Islam so how can you separate Muslims from Islam then?
          Islam IS MUSLIMS.

        • Angemon says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 5:21 am

          Peggy posted:

          “There are only Muslims in Islam so how can you separate Muslims from Islam then?
          Islam IS MUSLIMS.
          ”

          No, islam is an ideology, muslims are people who claim to follow that ideology.

        • Angemon says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 5:59 am

          Martin Infidel posted:

          “Peggy using the word “claim” is incorrect because the koran is different to the bible and the torah”

          Peggy didn’t use the word “claim”. I did. No ideology can ensure that those who profess to follow it will always abide by its tenets. The quran mentions “hypocrites”, people who claim to be muslims but willingly ignore its tenets for personal gain.

        • Demsci says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 1:23 am

          We can see Islam as the “sin” and Muslims as the “sinners”. We can then practice; “Hate the sin, love the sinner”. Or at least, we can try to distinquish between sinners.

          Islam is an ideology. But Muslims are humans.

          In our (Dutch) jurisprudence Geert Wilders was exonerated on the basis that he attacked a religion, Islam, and that he did not attack Muslims. Under our law religions are NOT protected, but humans are.

          Such a position does have advantages. I know it is a long shot, but the idea is that Islam does have competitors, both in religions and in lifestyles. And we are in a fight for the adherence to competing religions/ lifestyles of future generations. Even if the current Muslims tenaciously cling to Islam, we can still try to compete for the allegiance of future generations with our ideologies agaist theirs. instead of just trying to stop theirs, being only reactive, without pro-active offering muslims and potential converts PATI; Positive Alternatives To Islam.

        • Angemon says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 5:41 am

          Demsci posted:

          “Islam is an ideology. But Muslims are humans.

          In our (Dutch) jurisprudence Geert Wilders was exonerated on the basis that he attacked a religion, Islam, and that he did not attack Muslims. Under our law religions are NOT protected, but humans are.

          Such a position does have advantages. I know it is a long shot, but the idea is that Islam does have competitors, both in religions and in lifestyles.”

          True that, Demsci. IMO, a big chunk of the problem is that most people are ignorant of what islam teaches and bought hook,line and sinker the idea that organizations like al-qaeda or the islamic state have “hijacked” islam. If the average guy on the street knew what islam states about being superior to other religions then they wouldn’t take any “special accommodations”for muslims anywhere – no prayer breaks, no halal food, no permission to wear a burqa, nothing. And they would certainly think twice before allowing a mosque to be build in their area. Not to mention, if public awareness grew big enough to politicians and lawmakers to ignore, then islam status as a “religion” would be up for revision.

        • Demsci says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 11:47 am

          Martin Infidel, by all means, I don’t want to derail any counter-jihad-initiatives. I propose a two-way-strategy. Islam is so strong. Can’t we fight it in more ways than one?

          What IS the devilish attraction of Islam? I like something to compete with it. Something they worry about, something that comes at them like a truck or an avalanche!

          Is it perhaps to be found in Silicon Valley, with Google and Apple? What is it that we counterjihadists can be enthousiastic about so much that it effects and attracts young Muslims? Let the Mullahs and the Imams worry for a change!!!

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 5:51 pm

      Demsci wrote:

      What IS the devilish attraction of Islam? I like something to compete with it. Something they worry about, something that comes at them like a truck or an avalanche!
      …………………………..

      There are *lots* of attractive alternatives to Islam, Demsci—including civilized Western society.

      But if what someone finds attractive is a creed that is bloodily violent, supremacist, oppressive, and irrational, then no decent culture is going to present an attractive alternative.

      For such people, the only exciting things to come out of Silicon Valley are devices that can be used to set off explosives or to watch beheading videos on, or networks to connect and plot with other Jihadists.

      Certainly, they aren’t going to be attracted to a non-violent sub-culture that admires innovation, imagination, higher learning, and hard work.

      • Demsci says

        Jan 27, 2015 at 1:06 am

        You are quite right in what you wrote, Gravenimage.

        But as I see it: There are some cores of Islam, some rotten-to-the-core Muslims, and these you describe. Totally supremacist, hostile, completely hopeless. A big bunch of them are in Iran, but also in Turkey, Gaza, Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia.

        But there are also many tepid, uninteresested Muslims, I hope.

        Now I like to see us Westerners as. A. the normal, neutral people.
        B. The people with a positive religion/ lifestyle that is attractive to many, including young Muslims.

        And from what I heard about SOME people in Silicon Valley; they have amazing, thrilling ideas and lifestyles, that will transform life as we know it. Their technology makes them so much stronger, certainly than those backward Muslims, clinging to the 7th century, they are in a way already “transhumans”; humans enhanced by computers.

        But what really matters about them is how they give their lives meaning! To me this could give us a Positive alternative to Islam, that is meaningful.

        And if we will have a really good positive alternative to Islam, then people like me will ask; How about all these “ignorant, neutral, political correct” Westerners, many of whom goodheartedly but traitorously block counterjihadists every step of the way, shielding Muslims against us?

        I haven’t found a really thrilling good democratic and meaningful positive alternative to Islam yet, but when I do, I can see the adherents of it as positive people, making progress in a sea of BOTH Muslims AND these DAMNED ignorant, often downright traitorous “neutrals”!

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 27, 2015 at 2:23 pm

          Demsci, I live right in the Bay Area—Oakland is a high-tech center in and of itself—and I worked in Silicon Valley itself when I was just out of university, at a company that among other things made labels for high-tech firms.

          This technology *is* exciting—but this does not in and of itself create a new philosophy. Most techies are—broadly speaking—Western democrats in their philosophical ideals.

          Many of them, also, are sadly just as clueless about the threat of Islam as any other Westerners—perhaps more so, in some cases.

          And, as I noted, Silicon Valley high-tech—like *any* technology—can be used for good or ill, and by those who love freedom or those who want to destroy it.

          Many Muslims in the West have adopted aspects of Western culture. And why not? Western culture can be very comfortable.

          But when you scratch the surface, you find that most Muslims haven’t actually embraced core Western values like freedom, equality, tolerance, and respect for others. Instead, even in the West, large percentages of Muslims want to see the imposition of oppressive Shari’ah law, and believe that violent Jihad is legitimate to achieve this goal.

          In future, I see them taking just the same path when it comes to high-tech—just using what is useful in this aim, but nothing more.

          As is so often the case, I would love to be wrong. If large numbers of ravening Jihadists became productive, non-violent tech nerds, no one would be happier than myself.

  2. Joy says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 9:43 am

    OT: Why can’t I comment on Robert Spencer’s posts in Facebook? Thanks for the replies!

  3. Mac-101 says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 10:03 am

    Ya can’t make this stuff up. Whenever you think Islam can’t git lower and more disgustin, then they Jump da Shark again and again.
    .
    The whole temporary marriage thing EMBRACED by Religion and blessed by their religious leaders is disgustin, but forcing girls to join partake in temporary marriages NOT out of their own free will, at the treat of murder is inconceivable in the 21st century.
    .
    With dat bein said, I assume ALL the girls are Christian or ethic groups that are despised by the Sunni. If they are, why didn’t they just make em sex slaves. Gotta HATE “Islamic” reasonin!
    .
    It disgusts me that the USSA is supportin these Satanic Scum!
    .
    Stop ALL Islamic Immigration NOW and deport ALL and every one of them that supports the idea of a Global Caliphate and establishin Sharia Law to the Islamic Paradise of their choice!

    • BC says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 10:14 am

      Note It starts by saying that it is a Shia practice, but the Sunnis do not mind using the practice of the despised Shia when it suits them!

    • cranky.white.woman says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 2:43 pm

      I believe the women are Muslim because if they were infidel women, they would just use them as sex slaves because they would be considered captives or spoils of war, and they can do anything they want with them. But the fact that they’re trying to get them to enter into temporary marriage contracts would seem to indicate they are Muslimas.

      • Bettina says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 5:03 pm

        Very perceptive, Cranky 🙂

      • Greyhound Fancier says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 6:37 pm

        Temporary marriage would be with Muslimas. The sex slaves would not have a contract, because they have no rights.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 7:08 pm

        Quite right, cranky white woman.

  4. Bruce Hachey says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 10:10 am

    Hmmmm, I have no words to say regarding this outrageous atrocity. God forgive them. They will face Jesus some day and not allah. gonna be a big surprise for them no virgins, no wine, but hellfire forever.
    So sad .

    • voegelinian says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 1:54 pm

      “They will face Jesus some day”

      In the meantime, we need to stop them from killing us.

  5. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 10:12 am

    This episode puts the New Caliph mujahidin up a notch in my book. Instead of just grabbing her and taking her away for a couple of days of repeated rape, he asked for a Whore Marriage, a tradition in Islam much like Thighing or Taqiyya. He gave her respect, and he demanded the same.

    I’m troubled, though, by the leadership of A.B. al-Baghdadi. Shouldn’t these men have been instructed to not offer their kidnapped bishes even so much as a Whore Marriage? But, to be fair to the Caliph, maybe this clown disobeyed his orders.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 2:31 pm

      Alarmed Pig Farmer wrote:

      I’m troubled, though, by the leadership of A.B. al-Baghdadi. Shouldn’t these men have been instructed to not offer their kidnapped bishes even so much as a Whore Marriage?
      ………………………………………….

      APF, since these pious Muslims are claiming this is “Jihad for women”, I strongly suspect that the victims in this case are Sunni Muslim women, whom these Jihadists claim to “respect”. If they were Christians, Yazidis, or “heretic” Shia, they would just treat them as sex slaves—as, indeed, they have been.

      • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 2:35 pm

        Oh. This is the subtle nuance of the Holy Islam that keeps throwing me for a loop. Thx for the insight. You can’t win for losing with Moslems.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 6:00 pm

          Your comment about Islam having “subtle nuance” is grimly hilarious, APF.

      • Myxlplik says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 3:07 pm

        What I was wondering is how do the pious Muslim Islamic Mujahideen capture these women since they are not allowed outside unaccompanied.

        I imagine, the pious Muslim Islamic Mujahideen must be stalking neighborhoods, looking for prey, then accosting them in front of their fathers or brothers when they are out, or sacking the houses of known unwed girls. I assume this is the mechanism.

        … wonder how that suses out regarding Sharia.

  6. Ayatrollah says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 10:15 am

    The largest Sunni country, indoneisa does temporary marriage legally. Also islam has very easy divorce for the man so all marriage is really temporary.

    When ever a muslkm says “only Shia do temporary marriage” trying to push the shame away simply say “indoneisa”.

    • Lookmann says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 10:32 am

      LOL!

  7. BC says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 10:16 am

    The Shias use this in jail so they can rape the women before they are executed. These are the people Obama wants to allow to have nuclear weapons capability.

    • Salah says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 12:06 pm

      @ BC

      “The Shias use this in jail so they can rape the women before they are executed.”

      You’re right. Here’s what Ayatollah Yazdi had to say about the subject:

      “Can an interrogator rape a prisoner in order to obtain a confession?”
      He replied: “The neccessary precaution is for the interrogator to perform a ritual washing first and say prayers while raping the prisoner.”

      Ayatollah Yazdi was speaking about the raping of prisoners … BOTH MALES AND FEMALES: Rape, but wash first!

      http://crossmuslims.blogspot.ca/2010/04/rape-and-torture-viol-et-torture.html

      • Bettina says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 12:18 am

        BC, Salah, this is beyond the pale! I’ll never get over it.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 2:54 pm

      This is true, BC. It is considered un-Islamic to execute a virgin, and it is also believed that virgins will not go to hell.

      So if a virgin is sentenced to death—as has happened many times in Iran, especially in the wake of the Islamic Revolution there, in the following liquidation of the Communist Tudeh Party, and more recently after the protests in 2009—they just “marry” her to one of the guards who then rapes her on the night before her execution.

      Her grieving family is then presented with her “dowry”, which is often nothing more than a half-eaten piece of candy. This is to further taunt the family with the knowledge that their daughter was both raped and is now—as the regime, at least, believes—in hell for opposing the Ayatollahs.

      God, I hate Islam.

      • Champ says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 3:19 pm

        God, I hate Islam.

        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

        Same here, Graven! …and the tenets of islam sure are evil; in fact I hate all things evil:

        “Love must be sincere. Hate what is evil; cling to what is good.” — Romans 12:9

        …and I love to cling to the Good Shepherd: Jesus Christ! ✞

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 25, 2015 at 7:15 pm

          Agreed, Champ. And it is unbelievable that some Christians actually believe that Islam stands for family values. Nothing could be further from the truth.

        • EYESOPEN says

          Jan 25, 2015 at 8:57 pm

          Amen Champ!

        • Bettina says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 12:24 am

          “Hate what is evil” sounds all right to me — even though I discovered in some spiritual readings that the more one hates evil creatures, the more strength those entities derive from the moral person’s hatred.
          But in the case of evil islam and evil muslims, I simply can’t help myself.

  8. jihad3tracker says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 10:34 am

    OFF TOPIC — FORGIVE ME . WRITTEN AS “MEET THE PRESS” BEGINS —10:30 Eastern.

    CATCH THIS SHOW LIVE OR LATER …… Noted Muslim expert Kareem Abdul Jabbar (basketball great) will reveal whether violence is really a part of Islam . . . This should be interesting.

    • voegelinian says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 1:48 pm

      I can top that:

      Breaking News: “Tiger Woods will reveal whether he likes to play golf or not…”

      • jihad3tracker says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 4:34 pm

        A vid of Kareem’s appearance on M.T.P. is not hard to find with a web search.

        It is worth a look. Not for the taqiyya he ejects from his mouth, but rather for an expression on his face which is halfway between “deer in the headlights” and “uh — reality does not compute” . . .

        Some talented person here reading the comments ought to do a GIF with whirling pinwheels in place of Kareem’s eyeballs, equivalent to that poor schlub’s state of mind.

    • terry says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 7:39 pm

      This is how ISIS fighters can have some fun before martyrdom! “Nikah” Arabic word for the act of f**king.

      What a fun filled prospect for Jihadists. Even though their lives may end up being very very short on this planet, they are guaranteed to have a lot f**king and wait, it gets even better after martyrdom, as 72 very beautiful naked virgins are waiting for each one of them in paradise, after they have accomplished their mission of Jihad on this planet, by beheading or blowing up some infidels!

      I wonder, why the west is still scratching its head about why many young men, in the prime of their youth, when free testosterone circulating in their blood is literally at its highest, join ISIS, Jabhat al Nusra, Al Shabab, Boko Haram……?

      The prospect of abundance of “Nikah” explains, at least, some of the motivation provided to these young men.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 5:06 pm

        terry wrote:

        I wonder, why the west is still scratching its head about why many young men, in the prime of their youth, when free testosterone circulating in their blood is literally at its highest, join ISIS, Jabhat al Nusra, Al Shabab, Boko Haram……?

        The prospect of abundance of “Nikah” explains, at least, some of the motivation provided to these young men.
        ………………………………..

        Sure—young men everywhere are horny. But most Westerners—including very young men—would balk at the idea that they get lots of sex, but would get it in large part from sex slaves and women who are forced into temporary “marriage” on threat of death.

        Most Westerners are too decent to want this. Psychologically healthy men actually want sex to be consensual.

        Young Western men do convert to Islam—but these are largely losers and violent criminals.

  9. Alan says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 11:06 am

    So this Islam thing is supposed to be called a religion? It is nothing short of disgusting!

    • EYESOPEN says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 8:59 pm

      True Alan. It’s like that old quip: “The muzlims are revolting!” The reply: “You said it. They stink on ice!”

  10. ahsan says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 11:06 am

    The Islamic State (IS) militants are depicting islam negatively, May Allah firm our Iman; (http://allaboutislam.net/knowledge/iman-belief/

    • duyh_swami says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 1:53 pm

      Sorry Abu…The people posting here have already done their homework…No need for taqiyya…I only have one thing to add…’God damn Allah’…

      • terry says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 7:12 pm

        Ahsan,

        When are you gonna wake up, Mr. Kafir?

        Islam is depicting Islam negatively!

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 4:13 pm

      Taqiyya artist ahsan wrote:

      The Islamic State (IS) militants are depicting islam negatively, May Allah firm our Iman; (http://allaboutislam.net/knowledge/iman-belief/
      ……………………………….

      Notice that ahsan says *nothing* about these poor women—nor anything about the other victims of ISIS, including Christians and Yazidi women and girls forced into sex slavery, about the genocide of their communities, about their lining the streets of Mosul with severed heads, about their stoning women to death, about their beheading journalists and aid workers.

      And why would he? He only cares that this is “depicting Islam negatively”.

      Of course, where Islam is in full ascendancy, pious Muslims like ahsan don’t concern themselves with this—they only care when such “bad press” might lead to resistance from the “filthy Kuffar”. If they are as weak as non-Muslims in the Islamic State, the best the victims can hope for is to flee.

      And the page on the site he links to about “Iman” (Islamic belief”), does not in any way disavow any of the horrors that ISIS and other pious Jihadists like Boko Haram are committing in the name of Islam.

      And why should it? This appears to be a Sufi site, and despite the fact that so many in the West would like to believe otherwise, Sufism supports violent Jihad:

      http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2005/05/sufi_jihad.html

      The fact is that Sufism doesn’t oppose any of these horrors.

      As for marriage, it also allows temporary “marriage”, polygamy, and the murder of any women suspected of “Zina”.

      “ahsan” means “beautiful and radiant”, but this just sounds like more of the same Islamic savagery to me, lightly leavened with Taqiyya and Kitman.

      • somehistory says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 4:54 pm

        May ahsan get cookies made with hog lard on his computer for coming here to the site and posting such stuff as he said. May he not get an anti-virus to remove the cookies made with hog lard from his computer and may the hog lard spread over all his files and smell of bacon and ham hocks.

        • Bettina says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 2:17 pm

          Hear, hear!

      • Bettina says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 12:45 am

        Graven, thanks for the new word ‘Kitman’. I had to look it up in Wikipedia, where I found this 19th Century quote:

        “Ketman fills the man who practices it with pride. Thanks to it, a believer raises himself to a permanent state of superiority over the man he deceives, be he a minister of state or a powerful king; to him who uses Ketman, the other is a miserable blind man whom one shuts off from the true path whose existence he [the other] does not suspect, [while] … your eyes are filled with light, you walk in brightness before your enemies. It is an un-intelligent being that you make sport of; it is a dangerous beast that you disarm. What a wealth of pleasures!”

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 7:50 pm

          Thanks, Bettina, but I owe knowledge of this to the erudite Hugh Fitzgerald, who was a regular contributor to Jihad Watch not so long ago. You can find many articles and posts from him in the archives, most of which are very enlightening.

          He is now a contributor over at the New English Review. This is not a dedicated Anti-Jihad site like JW, but it does cover a lot of news about Jihad and Shari’ah.

          And thanks for that gloating, supremacist quote—very telling.

          I can think of no other creed besides Islam that so loves and even sacralizes lying and obfuscation. Besides Taqiyya and Kitman, there is also Maruna and Darura. All ways to fool the Kuffar through words or actions or careful ommission, and lull him into a false sense of security until Muslims are ready to strike. *Ugh*.

  11. Myxlplik says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 11:34 am

    OT

    More from Bill Maher, on Islam, and correcting Howard Dhimmi

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/01/24/maher_trumps_howard_dean_in_argument_over_radical_islam_youre_just_denying_the_facts.html

  12. Katnis says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 11:40 am

    I’m surprised there are any women left, with all the executions.

    Also, I can’t blame them for choosing death over temporary marriage.

    • Bettina says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 2:24 pm

      Yeah, I’d certainly choose death, myself — in lieu of temporary marriage to anyone in the horde of ugly, stenchy cowardly apes in isis, believe me.
      Yeah, monkeys, I hope you choke on all the poisonous testosterone you inject into your victims.
      THE DAY WILL COME when you’ll pay a hundred-fold for your evil deeds!

  13. Kenny says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 11:41 am

    Perversion! Religion of perversion that finds excuses to justify its immoral acts through its ‘holy book’, and has also got some ‘robotics’ who refuse to think but are following blindly to the pit of hell! I pray someday God opens their eyes to the truth!

    • Bettina says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 2:27 pm

      Kenny, why on earth would you pray that God will open the eyes of satan??

      • Jen says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 5:19 pm

        Likely a Protestant, Bettina. Unfortunately, other Christians like Catholics and Orthodox get lumped in with them under the label of ‘Christian’; but the weirdo, over the top holier-than-thou behaviour associated with Christianity today; is often only the behavior of Protestants. Not other Christians. Common sense still prevails among the followers of Jesus Christ generally speaking. It’s the behaviour of all too many Protestants which causes people to think Christianity is for loons and the feeble minded.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 8:38 pm

        Bettina and Jen, I think what Kenny means is that he would like to see Muslims become apostates and leave Islam. Surely not such a bad thing.

        Some of our stanchest allies are Muslim apostates.

  14. Renee says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 12:06 pm

    Do not understand since they are Sunni’s? Anyway, anything goes when men are “deprived”. Then Allah must compromise his standards to the animal behaviour of humans. Of course, all at the expense of secondary creatures such as women.

    • cranky.white.woman says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 2:46 pm

      I think you meant to say “anything goes when men are depraved.” There, fixed it for you 😉

      • Bettina says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 2:29 pm

        Fine point, Cranky.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 4:17 pm

      Temporary “marriage” is *not* just a Shia concept, Renee. It was also condoned by the baleful “Prophet” Muhammed.

      • Angemon says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 4:26 pm

        gravenimage posted.

        “Temporary “marriage” is *not* just a Shia concept, Renee. It was also condoned by the baleful “Prophet” Muhammed.”

        True, GI. Sunnis believe muhammad abolished it, shias don’t. But then we have islamic orthodoxy, the example of muhammad and context – necessity makes forbidden things permissible.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 25, 2015 at 7:29 pm

          Angemon wrote:

          True, GI. Sunnis believe muhammad abolished it, shias don’t. But then we have islamic orthodoxy, the example of muhammad and context – necessity makes forbidden things permissible.
          ……………………………

          Very true, Angemon. And as you know, “necessity” doesn’t necessarily mean “I’m literally starving to death, and all that’s available are pork sausages”—it can also mean, “I’m on Jihad, and I’m damn horny”.

          Have I mentioned how much I hate Islam?

        • dlbrand says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 2:31 am

          “Very true, Angemon. And as you know, “necessity” doesn’t necessarily mean “I’m literally starving to death, and all that’s available are pork sausages”—it can also mean, “I’m on Jihad, and I’m damn horny”.

          Precisely. As the following ahadith speak to:

          Zaid bin Khalid Al-Juhani nattated that the Messenger of Allah said, “Whoever prepares a fighter in Allah’s cause, he has participated in a military expedition, and whoever watches after the family of a fighter, he has participated in a military expedition.

          Footnotes thereat read as follows:

          Helping a Mujahid with money and material is an act of such great virtue that it is considered as good as one’s physical participation in Jihad. Similarly, taking care of the family of the Mujahid in his absence and helping them with their daily needs and necessities is also considered as good as one’s physical participation in Jihad.

          (Jami At-Tirmidhi, Compiled by: Imam Hafiz Abu ‘Eisa Mohammad Ibn ‘Eisa At-Tirmidhi, Translated by: Abu Khaliyl (USA), Ahadith edited and referenced by” Hafiz Abu Tahir Zubair ‘Ali Za’i, Final Review by: Islamic Research Section, Darussalam, First Edition, 2007; Vol. 3, The Chapter of the Virtues of Jihad, P. 386, #1631, Footnotes respectively.)

          What’s more, given all able-bodied Muslim men are obligated to participate in jihad, one therefore clearly deduces from the following hadith, that that the so-called prophet of Islam, the one his Qur’an calls, the exemplary example to follow, from his perspective, counted amongst the needs for the mujahid:

          Abdullah bin ‘Abdur-Rahman bin Abu Husain narrated that the Messenger of Allah said: “Indeed, Allah will surely admit three into Paradise by a single arrow. Its maker who seeks good by his making it, the one who shoots it, and the one who holds arrows for him.”

          And he said: “Practice archery and practice riding, and that you should practice archery is more beloved to me than you should ride.

          All idle pastimes that the Muslims man engages in are falsehood, except for his shooting of his bow, his training of his horse, and his playing with his wife, for they are from truth. (Sahih)

          (Ibid, P. 391, #1637.)

          Hard to play with ones wife if one has no wife, therefore, the proposal.

          And the following, clearly, guidance and admonition for the prospective temporary brides who were the recipients of the said proposal:

          ‘Uqbah bin ‘Amir narrated: “I said: ‘O Messenger of Allall! We come across a people and they do not host us, and they do not give us our rights, and we do not take anything from them. So the Messenger of Allah said: ‘If they refuse such that you can only take by force, then take.’” (Sahih.)

          FN: This Hadith only means that they would go out for battles and they would pass a people among whom they would not find any food to buy for a price. So the Prophet told them: If they refuse to sell to you, such that you have to take it forcefully, then take it. This is how the explanation has been related in some of the Ahadith. And it has been related that ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab, may Allah be pleased with him, would order similarly.

          (Ibid, The Chapters of Military Expeditions, P. 356, # 1589, + FN.)

          Clearly, therein, the precedent set for freedom of the Muslims to fulfill their needs by force, if need be.

          Therefore, given that precedent was establish, sunna set, reliable Tafsir provides, hadith narrative of an example of punishment due one, who disregards the alleged prophet’s command, or his opinion, or his judgment on a matter. Serious penalties for such, as in capital punishment, to be brief.

        • Bettina says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 2:35 pm

          I enjoy your erudition, Angemon, Graven, DLBrand — keeps me in the learning mode any time I read you.

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 10:09 pm

          Very important points, dlbrand.

          And when this pious thug says that sexually servicing ‘Mujahideens’ is “Jihad for women” then refusing it is *refusing to wage Jihad*. That makes these women”hypocrites”, and hence they deserve to be killed.

          In fact, waging Jihad against “hypocrites” is also obligatory for pious Muslims.

          Here’s Islam Q & A, which is the most widely read Muslim website:

          “Jihad Against the Hypocrites”

          “Undoubtedly waging jihad against these people and carrying out the hadd punishments against them is one of the greatest acts of obedience and most important obligatory actions. It is better than waging jihad against those mushrikeen and people of the Book who do not fight the Muslims, for waging jihad against these comes under the same heading as waging jihad against the apostates…

          “Moreover the harm that these people (hypocrites) cause to the Muslims is greater than that caused by others (kaafirs), indeed their harm is like that caused by the mushrikeen and people of the Book who fight the Muslims. The damage that they do to the religious commitment of many people is worse than the damage done by those mushrikeen and people of the Book who wage war on us. Every Muslim must do as much as he can of his duty…

          “O Prophet (Muhammad)! Strive hard against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be harsh against them”

          [al-Tawbah 9:73]

          http://islamqa.info/en/42534

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 10:15 pm

          I agree, Bettina—I have learned almost as much from knowledgeable posters here at Jihad Watch as I have from any other source.

      • Bettina says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 2:32 pm

        Found clarification for ‘baleful’: menacing, threatening, hostile, antagonistic, evil, evil-intentioned, vindictive, wicked, nasty, bitter, acrimonious, malevolent, malicious, malignant, sinister; harmful, injurious, dangerous, destructive, noxious, pernicious, deadly, venomous, poisonous, vitriolic…

        Good word, Graven 🙂

        • Bettina says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 2:42 pm

          DL, you rightly said “Clearly, therein, the precedent set for freedom of the Muslims to fulfill their needs by force, if need be.”

          Any indication where these muslim monsters get their narcissism and entitlement from?
          It’s in the holy scripture, so rally ’round, ugly sociopaths, this one’s for you!

        • dlbrand says

          Jan 27, 2015 at 2:09 am

          Indeed, GI, Bettina.

          And thank you all.

          dl

  15. ecosse1314 says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 12:25 pm

    Of course …there is no compulsion in religion……except kaffirs and females.

  16. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 12:33 pm

    Temporary marriage echoes Moslem peace: temporary. The former is derived from the latter.

  17. zulu says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 12:44 pm

    UK – It should NOT be a crime to join ISIS, says Green party leader who does not want to punish people for what they think

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2925596/It-NOT-crime-join-ISIS-says-Green-party-leader-does-not-want-punish-people-think.html#ixzz3Pr9Qqiw8

    • zulu says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 12:49 pm

      It Should NOT be a Crime to Join ISIS, says Green Party Leader Natalie Bennett

      • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 12:59 pm

        Environmentalists are every bit as deluded and sanctimonious as Moslems. Propped up by fake science to solve a problem that doesn’t exist, except in their fevered minds.

        G.S.E.R.S. = Globo-Socialist Environmentalist Racist Sexist. The Geezers are wheezers blowing their hot sour breath all over us. Centralize gubmint to eliminate freedom to solve problems that don’t exist so as to empower controlling elites. These people are the natural cousins of Moslems.

        • Bettina says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 2:46 pm

          APF, I’m an islam-hating environmentalist — go figure 🙂

        • Bettina says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 2:48 pm

          I’m also one of those animal-rights aficioñados smartly aligned against islam — go figure 🙂

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 4:32 pm

        Talk about unclear on the concept! Joining ISIS is not a thought, but an *action*.

        This is additionally absurd, because many of the Greens and other far-leftists very much agree with punishing “thought crimes”.

        Thanks for posting that, zulu.

  18. Mattt-ن says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 1:21 pm

    This type of marriage is practiced in North America too .. When I started school English as second langouge back in 1998 this Muslim guy hands me this print out that contain the temporary marriage vows telling
    Me that I might need it .. I told no thanx I am christain .. Then few months later I met few Muslims at the bar drinking doing all these “sins” and then asking girls out and after the bar I went to coffe shop near by and this guy is exchanging vows with a blond girl and she was drunk and cool with it .. So ya it’s common here too just to let you know..

    • voegelinian says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 2:02 pm

      Thanks to Mattt, we see a glimpse into what we should reasonably suppose, given the mountains of data and oceans of dots we already have — namely, that all Muslims are down with all of the worst we know of Islam.

      Yes, JW Softies; I said all.

      • Angemon says

        Jan 25, 2015 at 3:53 pm

        voegelinian posted:

        “Thanks to Mattt, we see a glimpse into what we should reasonably suppose, given the mountains of data and oceans of dots we already have — namely, that all Muslims are down with all of the worst we know of Islam.”

        Huh, voeg? Unless Mattt-ن: knows ALL muslims (and what he posted was “his type of marriage is practiced in North America too “) then you’re making a sweeping generalization for which you can’t possibly provide evidence for.

        “Yes, JW Softies; I said all.”

        Did you ever said otherwise? I certainly don’t recall you ever saying that only some muslims did this or that.

      • dlbrand says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 12:10 pm

        Indeed, as I have stated many times, wherever Islam is practiced, Islam will be practiced.

    • katnis says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 4:34 pm

      What? This type of arrangement – common in North America? I don’t think so. Maybe I missed the handout? 😉

      • Bettina says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 3:06 pm

        Kat, you hit it on the nail about considering one or two instances as sufficient to be common. Glad you mentioned it.
        Still, I appreciate Mattt-ن ‘s empirical contribution(s)…

  19. Champ says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 1:33 pm

    “What? ..you won’t let me rape you? ..off with your head!”

    They may justify this evil by calling it “temporary marriage”, nevertheless it’s rape, plain and simple. Wow what evil savages courtesy the death cult from hell: islam.

    • EYESOPEN says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 9:05 pm

      Well said Champ! A BULLS-EYE!

    • Bettina says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 3:10 pm

      Yeah, it’s rape — or easy taqyyia on a drunken woman; take your pick. Please refer to the Wikipedia quote I found on Kitman, THE centerpiece of Islamic duplicity.

  20. voegelinian says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 1:50 pm

    “Temporary marriage is an established Shi’ite concept.”

    And since ISIS is Sunni, we have yet another piece of evidence (to add to the mountains we already have) that all information about Islam that seems to exonerate it or any part of it (“temporary marriage is only a Shia practice” or “taqiyya is only a Shia practice” or “clitorectomy is only a cultural practice” et fucking cetera) are so many hillocks of camelshit steaming under the desert sun.

    • Angemon says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 3:46 pm

      voegelinian posted:

      “we have yet another piece of evidence (to add to the mountains we already have)”

      Do those “mountains of evidence” include the treatment given to apostates in islamic countries? I’m asking because last time someone brought that issue up you said that there was “no way of verifying it — and certainly no way to verify specifics about it“.

    • dlbrand says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 12:12 pm

      “Vogie” stated: ….(in short, of Islam, it is): “many hillocks of camelshit steaming under the desert sun.”

      Indeed, indeed, well stated, tough to top that.

      • Bettina says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 3:27 pm

        Loved the highly stinky image 🙂
        So much so that it, alone, helps to exonerate Voegel of a previously held miss-thought about lethal apostasy in muslim-infested countries — doesn’t it?

        Still, Voegel, why do you think Salman Rushdie and so many others from those ‘cultures’ run like hell from the perennial threat of death at the hands of all those devout muslims, and under their fatwas?

        • Angemon says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 3:58 pm

          Bettina posted:

          “So much so that it, alone, helps to exonerate Voegel of a previously held miss-thought about lethal apostasy in muslim-infested countries — doesn’t it?”

          Exoneration occurs when someone accused of a crime is proved to be innocent, which is not the case here.

        • Jen says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 5:45 pm

          Angemon, ‘exonerate’ isn’t a word used only in a legal context. And I’m sure Bettina was just bantering. Prostitution is also not ‘illegal’ everywhere despite what you might have thought; including places which would often be considered part of ‘the west.’

        • Angemon says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 6:05 pm

          Jen posted:

          “Angemon, ‘exonerate’ isn’t a word used only in a legal context. And I’m sure Bettina was just bantering.”

          Voeg saw fit to lie about something easily verifiable because the truth is damaging to his narrative – that’s typical leftist-fascist tactics, nothing new to him. Such behaviour is damaging to the Counter-Jihad movement overall, and nothing good comes from condoning or excusing it. For all intents and purposes, saying that there’s no way to verify what happens to apostates in muslim countries is not much different from saying that Hirsi Ali or Ibn Warraq are liars.

          Would you look Hirsi Ali in the eyes when she’s talking about what happens to apostates in islamic countries and tell her that there’s no way to verify what she’s saying, and that if what she ways is true then it’s a human rights tragedy, but you have your own agenda to push and therefore what she says is not worth discussing?

        • Jen says

          Jan 26, 2015 at 8:34 pm

          Give it a rest Angemon, ya yawn inducer you. I was referring to your over the top, nit picking; nothing else. It was obviously banter but you couldn’t refrain yourself again. I know it’s hard Angemon…I know it’s hard…. Nit picker tics can be very hard to control….
          My agenda is genuinely helping counter-jihad by approaching churches, people willing to sponsor this movement, trying to find anyone in politics at all who might be able to help my country and who will agree to put these issues on the table, giving talks, sending information to people, handing it out to strangers and so on and so forth. Not largely sitting on my bum bum, like some and taking myself so seriously.

        • Angemon says

          Jan 27, 2015 at 5:34 am

          Jen posted:

          “Give it a rest Angemon, ya yawn inducer you. I was referring to your over the top, nit picking; nothing else. It was obviously banter but you couldn’t refrain yourself again. I know it’s hard Angemon…I know it’s hard…. Nit picker tics can be very hard to control….”

          I called you out and now you’re slithering away. Good riddance.

          “My agenda is genuinely helping counter-jihad”

          By excusing people who undermine the counter-jihad movement?

          “by approaching churches, people willing to sponsor this movement, trying to find anyone in politics at all who might be able to help my country and who will agree to put these issues on the table, giving talks, sending information to people, handing it out to strangers and so on and so forth. Not largely sitting on my bum bum, like some and taking myself so seriously.”

          You don’t know me and you have no idea what I do outside of jihad watch. But feel free to keep telling yourself that you do more than the rest, if it helps you to sleep better at night.

        • Champ says

          Jan 27, 2015 at 3:41 pm

          Angemon is NOT a “Nit-picker”, nor is he boring. Hardly! He is a smart guy with an unique ability to zero in on the garbage put forth by many that post on this forum. Angemon is an asset to JW, and I greatly appreciate his contributions and clear-cut analysis!

        • Champ says

          Jan 27, 2015 at 3:47 pm

          PJ wrote:

          How about you give it a rest, instead?

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Wise words and a fitting response to the one who’s fast becoming the “Jerk” around here …and who’s ironically the Nit-picker, as well. Wow get a mirror.

        • Jen says

          Jan 29, 2015 at 4:44 am

          Haha…Just saw this. Syrupy “Champ” “xoxoxo!” “You’re the *BEST*! xoxox” *vomits*

  21. duh_swami says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 2:16 pm

    I have been given the gift of the longest concepts with the shortest meanings…
    One of them is just ‘three little words’…’God damn Allah’…Hows that for short?

    • Champ says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 2:29 pm

      LOL!!! ..good one, Swami, you’re so funny! 🙂 xo

  22. Jay Boo says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 2:25 pm

    Muslims this is your religion.

    Muhammad could not control his sexual desires.
    Muhammad had wild vengeful fits of rage and then he would even threaten to throw himself off a cliff.
    He expected others to take pity on his suicidal wishes.
    He admitted that he did no know if he would be forgiven for his many sins.
    He OWNED sex slaves.

    Muhammad called himself a prophet

    Martin and others focus too mush on the symptoms of Islam rather than uncovering the disease.

  23. Jay Boo says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 2:33 pm

    Imam-inized
    Fatwa-dized
    Satanic verse butcher knife slave-trade pimping of Islam.

    Just like Muhammad did.

  24. Myxlplik says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 2:42 pm

    Huh, so I guess that means they ran out of Halal Yazidi sex slaves?

  25. somehistory says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 2:46 pm

    Death instead of “marriage” or….with the prevalence of disease…HIV/AIDS included…death afterward” .Maybe pregnancy too and then what? We all know…or can reasonably suspect.

    No barbarism, no atrocity, no demonic thought or practice too low or degrading for islam…the beast straight from satan.

    Death with dignity is so much better than any other offer from satan and his minions.
    And death awaits all who worship the beast of or beastly satan
    (rev. 13; 17;19;20;21)

    • cranky.white.woman says

      Jan 25, 2015 at 2:55 pm

      If their Allah really was God and really did issue all of the perverse and vile commands found in the Quran, I’d take my chances in Hell…I would not worship such a god.

      Happily, I worship the one true living God, Jesus, who loves us all, saints and sinners alike, and would never command men to rape or kill women and girls. And I didn’t have to do any vile, disgusting acts against my fellow humans to find salvation. I only had to receive the gift of Grace He offers. I love him <3

  26. gravenimage says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 3:15 pm

    Islamic State executes women for refusing temporary marriage
    …………………………………..

    Of all the ludicrous Taqiyya regarding Islam—that it is a “religion of peace”, that it stands for “social justice”, even that it is “green” (in the environmental sense), one of the most grotesque is that it upholds “family values”.

    Even a great many conservatives who might criticize violent Jihad believe this absurd crap.

    The fact is that Islam could not be *less* family-friendly—it condones child “marriage”, forced marriage, polygamy, wife beating, summary divorce of wives, sex slaves on the side, “temporary marriage” which is nothing more than legalized prostitution, and the “Honor Killing” of wives and children who are deemed “disobedient”—including those who might resist forced marriage as here.

    It is only ignorance—or willful ignorance—of the above that could lead any decent Infidel to swallow the idea that Islam upholds family values.

    For pious Muslims, of course, such horrors *are* family values.

    Muslims use words—”peace”, “innocents”, “justice”, “terrorism”, and, yes, “family values”—differently than we do.

    • Bettina says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 3:43 pm

      A good narration of the purulent mess that is islam, Graven.
      And this feeds into the fact that our media and politicians, who should be blinded by reality, still persist in saying that these Allahu Akhbaring terrorists really have nothing to do with the ‘religion of peace,’ which they misunderstand and misrepresent by way of direct koranic quotations.

      One consoling fact in our self-imposed darkness:
      Seeing Hannity ram his way thru Obama et al who still refuse to juxtapose “Terrorism” and “Islamic,” and “Jihadism” with all the murderous chaos on our planet.

      • Bettina says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 3:46 pm

        “intrinsic to all the murderous chaos,” not “with.”

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 10:41 pm

        Sean Hannity still has his blind spots—but he is one of the few mainstream figures on the news who actually does speak out forcefully against Jihad.

    • dlbrand says

      Jan 27, 2015 at 2:23 am

      gravenimage says: ” It is only ignorance—or willful ignorance—of the above that could lead any decent Infidel to swallow the idea that Islam upholds family values.

      For pious Muslims, of course, such horrors *are* family values.”

      Indeed. Well stated, GI. Well stated.

  27. Bettina says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 4:49 pm

    I like the way you think, Martin 🙂

  28. John says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 5:11 pm

    “temporary marriage”
    🙂

  29. Zimriel says

    Jan 25, 2015 at 6:20 pm

    Specifically the practice is ‘Abbasid. ‘Ali himself didn’t approve; Ibn ‘Abbas was the big proponent of it up to the 60s / 680s. Later as we all know, the ‘Abbasids won and the various Shi’at ‘Ali went into hiding.

    Keep in mind that among the Shi’a the Zaydis (they’re in the news now as Houthis) and the Ismailis (Assassins) REJECT muta. It’s the 12ers in Iraq and Iran who’ve dragged this stinking corpse from its well-deserved grave. . .

    With ISIS you can bet that where Islam offers two options, a humanistic option and an inhuman option, ISIS will go with the inhuman option. It shows the strength of their loyalty and instills fear in the others.

  30. Denis MacEoin says

    Jan 26, 2015 at 6:29 am

    ‘Nikah’ is NOT temporary marriage. It is regular marriage in both Sunnism and Shi’ism. The correct term for temporary marriage is either mut’a (lit. ‘pleasure’) or, in Persian, sigheh. What is growing in Saudi Arabia (and the Gulf) is misyar marriage, a Sunni version of nikah designed for men who travel and require a wife in another town. This entire article seems to me to be badly informed and misleading. Given that Islamic State uses concubinage, were these seven women being forced into nikah or were they slaves who refused sex to their purchasers?

    • mortimer says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 10:21 am

      Perhaps it’s referring to ‘serial nikah’…which is a way of legally contracting a valid marriage with repeated divorces occurring every few days. This is a way to get around the scruples of the wise with the blessing of the mufti of the caliph. Everyone knows exactly what it actually is: forced prostitution of slaves. That is supposed to be illegal in Islam! Ha!

      Sin is highly dependent on the intention. The intention of these criminal scoundrels is to use women and then execute them when the rapists are done with them.

      • Alex says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 7:46 pm

        Nikah actually mean “fuck” This the accurate meaning of the word and that what the Quran uses in describing a relation between a man and a woman. The Quran uses “Nekah” for a noun and “Enkah for a verb and the ordinary Arabic speaking person totally understand that. Some polite women in these countries refuse to utter these words.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 4:15 pm

      The disgusting Denis MacEoin wrote:

      ‘Nikah’ is NOT temporary marriage. It is regular marriage in both Sunnism and Shi’ism.
      …………………………………

      My God, what crap. “Nikah” is the lawful right to have intercourse in Islam—this can refer to *any* marriage in Islam, *including* temporary marriage.

      Even Islamic apologists acknowledge this:

      http://www.answering-christianity.com/bassam_zawadi/meaning_of_nikah.htm

      More:

      The correct term for temporary marriage is either mut’a (lit. ‘pleasure’) or, in Persian, sigheh. What is growing in Saudi Arabia (and the Gulf) is misyar marriage, a Sunni version of nikah designed for men who travel and require a wife in another town.
      …………………………………

      Even Denis MacEoin is here acknowledging that Misyar marriage is a form of Nikah—as indeed it is. Any “marriage” that involves lawful sexual intercourse is a form of Nikah, be it long-term or temporary.

      And note more of his repulsive apologia—the idea that a man “requires’ a “wife” in another town. Despite his weasel words, this is more proof that “temporary marriages” are nothing more than sacralized prostitution.

      More:

      This entire article seems to me to be badly informed and misleading. Given that Islamic State uses concubinage, were these seven women being forced into nikah or were they slaves who refused sex to their purchasers?
      ……………………………

      Only a vile Muslim apologist would try to whitewash execution for refusing forced temporary marriage by referring to Muslims raping their sex slaves.

      This involves a depth of depravity that is just breathtaking.

      It is also, of course, utter bullsh*t.

      From the article:

      “IS tell women that if they have sex with IS insurgents within the contract of nikah, it will be considered jihad for women.”

      In other words, these are *Muslim* women—certainly orthodox Sunni, since ISIS has been treating Shia women as “heretics” regarded as non-Muslims.

      So ISIS is *both* using non-Muslim and minority-sect Muslim sex slaves *and* executing Sunni women who refuse to sexually service Jihadists.

      There is, in fact, nothing “badly informed” or “misleading” about the above article. It simply chronicles yet another Muslim atrocity in the Caliphate. **Ugh**.

    • Champ says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 4:42 pm

      Dastardly “Denise” makes NO mention of the seven women that were executed! All he gets *angry* over are other issues of lesser importance. And don’t you dare come back and speak for these women now, because it’s too late for that–you’ve already defined what’s important to YOU “Denise”.

      • Champ says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 4:43 pm

        o0ps: I meant “Denis”, not Denise …

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 27, 2015 at 1:50 pm

        Agreed, Champ. This is a common tactic with Muslim trolls—ignoring the main issue, which is usually something horrific, and instead focusing on some insignificant point that the article has supposedly gotten wrong.

        They hope that this will somehow lead to doubts about the veracity of the story as a whole—or even to any criticism of Islam.

        But here he is wrong—or outright lying—in any case, since there are no mistakes in the above story.

        • Champ says

          Jan 27, 2015 at 5:14 pm

          But here he is wrong—or outright lying—in any case, since there are no mistakes in the above story.

          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

          Precisely, Graven! ..thank you for catching that 🙂

  31. BARRY says

    Jan 26, 2015 at 8:58 am

    Assuming that this article is correct, I see savage men with guns, arrogant in their power over helpless, but brave and moral, women, justifying their bestial lusts and crimes, by means of written words, which permits them to do what they wanted to do anyway.

    Irregardless of what the Qur’an says, it is a crime done by criminals.

    • ben haggai says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 9:14 am

      How about writing “regardless”, rather than irregardless? Or you may perhaps want to say “irrespective”, as irregardless, doesn’t exist in the English language. But I agree with you: to force a woman into a “commercial temporary marriage” (which is called prostitution, in Western countries) is a crime, done by criminals. These “marriages” can last one hour, or half an hour only, depending on what the parts agree upon. What would you call that, other than prostitution?

      • somehistory says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 10:42 am

        It does exist (the word appeared in print as early as 1795)., although some dictionaries say it shouldn’t be used.

        ir·re·gard·less
        ˌiriˈɡärdlis/
        adjective & adverb
        informal
        adjective: irregardless; adverb: irregardless

        from Google and wickipedia says that about the usage from the 1700’s, Oxforddictionaries.com also say it is a word.

        regardless.

      • dlbrand says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 12:22 pm

        ben haggai says: “… What would you call that, other than prostitution?”

        From the Islamic perspective, given, it would helping the mujihid, equipping him (testosterone–use or lose it), meeting his needs, therefore, jihad, therefore worship to Muhammad and his puppet Allah.

    • dlbrand says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 1:46 pm

      Barry,

      You said, in the above article, “I see savage men with guns, arrogant in their power over helpless, but brave and moral, women, justifying their bestial lusts and crimes, by means of written words, which permits them to do what they wanted to do anyway.”

      Indeed. You added, “Irregardless of what the Qur’an says, it is a crime done by criminals.”

      Indeed, as are many actions the believer is obligated to execute.

      As the following clearly speaks to:

      Al-Bukhari also stated the Hibban related to him, quoting “Abd Allah b. Sayfi, from Abu Ma ‘bad, the freed man of ibn Abbas, from Ibn Abbas, who said, “ The Messenger of God (SAAS) said to Mu ‘adh b. Jabal, when he dispatched him to Yemen, ‘You are going to people who have a scripture. When you reach them, invite them to testify that there is no god but God and that Muhammad is the Messenger of God. If they obey you in that, then tell them God has enjoined upon them five prayers each day and night. If they obey you in that, then tell them that God obligates them to ….If they obey you in that, then refrain from taking their best properties….”

      (The Life of the Prophet Muhammad, Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya, Ibn Kathir, Translated by Professor Trevor Le Gassick, Reviewed by Dr. Muneer Fareed, Garnet Publishing, 1998, Reprinted 2002,2004,2006, Lebanon. Vol. IV. P. 136.)

      Therefrom we deduce, the action that the self-claimed “Messenger of God” ordered Mu ‘adh b. Jabal to take if the people of Yemen refused to testify as noted, refused to obey as instructed to.

      And that action is, should they refuse to embrace Islam, refuse to submit to its rule, live by its ordinances, etc., then, Mu ‘adh b. Jabal was thus commanded to then take from them, precisely what the so-called prophet instructed him to take, that being, “their best properties.”

      With that in mind, what better, what higher valued “property” does one possess beyond that which houses one’s soul, mind, heart, spirit?

      Therefore, if the girls spoken of in the above article, featuring, one more instance of the absence of regard for the sanctity-of-life in the fruits of Muhammad’s Islam; if they rejected the ordinances of Islam, then the taking of their choice property, by the hands of the believers, is clearly both a Muhammad-sanctioned-act, as well as, an Allah-obeying act.

    • Bettina says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 3:51 pm

      Oh, the Islamic duplicity!

      • dlbrand says

        Jan 26, 2015 at 9:02 pm

        Bettina says: “Oh, the Islamic duplicity!”

        Indeed.

  32. Isabellathecrusader says

    Jan 26, 2015 at 2:31 pm

    You wouldn’t let us rape you so we’re going to kill you.

    • EYESOPEN says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 4:28 pm

      In a word, yes.

    • dlbrand says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 9:05 pm

      And in disallowing the jihadists their desired pleasure of the moments or hours, in that, the girls clearly rejected the decision of the so-called prophet, therefore, the “punishment” they received.

      Basic Islam.

  33. Jeff says

    Jan 26, 2015 at 3:48 pm

    This has nothing to do with Islam, even though it does. Move along, nothing to see here. Islam is a religion of peace, even though it isn’t. Next. Anyone saying anything against Islam is a racist bigot, even though they probably aren’t. Stop speaking the truth about Islam, terrorism, and jihad it just means you’re an Islamophobe.

    • dlbrand says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 9:07 pm

      Indeed, Jeff, as you stated, “This has nothing,” except for everything, ” to do with Islam.”

  34. Uncle Vladdi says

    Jan 26, 2015 at 4:37 pm

    THE RELIGION OF RAPE: “Women are made deficient in intelligence, as beasts of burden for men’s sexual pleasure, as fertile fields to be plowed at will by men. So if your women refuse to give you sex whenever you want it, beat them and lock them up without food (starve them to death) until they repent and Submit to your desires and demands. Might makes right!!!”

    • dlbrand says

      Jan 26, 2015 at 9:08 pm

      You got it, Uncle V.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Michael Copeland on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • Dude on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.