• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Muslim cleric: “We shall chop off the head of France, with a sword that bears the words: ‘There is no god but Allah.'”

Jan 16, 2015 1:29 pm By Robert Spencer

Zarouq also said: “All Muslims must kiss the head and hands of those who killed the journalists.” This is because, he explained, “According to the sacred texts, and by consensus of the Islamic scholars, those who curse the Prophet Muhammad should be killed, regardless of whether or not they repent. Those who curse the Prophet should be killed.” Will one of the legion of mainstream media Islamic apologists — Reza Aslan? Qasim Rashid? — kindly explain how this Muslim cleric is misunderstanding Islam? I didn’t think so.

“ISIS Sermon: Muslims Should Kiss the Heads and Hands of Paris Attackers,” MEMRI, January 13, 2015:

Following are excerpts from a sermon delivered by Tunisian Cleric Kamal Zarouq in ISIS-controlled Al-Raqqah, Syria. The sermon was posted on the Internet on January 13, 2015:

Kamal Zarouq: All Muslims must kiss the head and hands of those who killed the journalists. All monotheists should kiss their hands. Those who condemn them are apostates, who renounced Islam and sold it out for a cheap price. Those who curse the Prophet Muhammad… As the Islamic State, it is a duty incumbent upon us to mobilize against the infidels and to avoid misdeeds and sin. It is a duty incumbent upon all our supporters who are able to bear arms to defend Islam and the Islamic nation.

[…]

Some people curse the Prophet Muhammad, yet there are people who do not want the Islamic nation to and kill them. According to the sacred texts, and by consensus of the Islamic scholars, those who curse the Prophet Muhammad should be killed, regardless of whether or not they repent. Those who curse the Prophet should be killed.

Let the entire world hear: Those who curse the Prophet Muhammad – If we do not kill them this year, we shall kill them next year. If we do not kill them next year, our sons, these young men, will kill them.

[…]

I bring you the glad tidings that France will be conquered, Allah willing. We will not boycott French products, as some wretched people have proposed. Allah willing, we shall chop off the head of France, with a sword that bears the words: “There is no god but Allah.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: blasphemy, France, Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, Daesh) Tagged With: Kamal Zarouq


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 1:34 pm

    Fight until there is no God but Allah. As Dr. Howard Dean, M.D. famously said, “Yeeeeahhhh!”

  2. katnis says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 1:47 pm

    “If we do not kill them this year, we shall kill them next year. If we do not kill them next year, our sons, these young men, will kill them.”

    In place of deportation, I vote for mandatory sterilization and lobotomies. Maybe we could create a new band of workers to do manual labor? Might as well put them to use somehow.

    • mortimer says

      Jan 16, 2015 at 2:05 pm

      Expand Guantanamo.

      • profitsbeard says

        Jan 16, 2015 at 3:31 pm

        The Traitor-In-Chief, meanwhile, quietly releases more terrorists from Gitmo so that they can return to the War.

        How he remains uncharged and unimpeached by Congress demonstrates that they bow in complicity to this treachery.

        As the old poem put it:

        Treason doth never prosper
        What’s the reason?
        For if it doth prosper
        None dare call it treason.

      • Betty says

        Jan 17, 2015 at 9:53 am

        and make sure that muslim in the white house leads the pack going in to gitmo.

    • Ross says

      Jan 16, 2015 at 2:26 pm

      It’s time to break out the Napalm.

      • Papa Whiskey says

        Jan 16, 2015 at 4:09 pm

        That’s old-school. Think thermobaric fuel-air) munitions, such as the AGM-114N metal augmented charge (MAC) warhead on the Hellfire missile.

        • jihad3tracker says

          Jan 16, 2015 at 4:57 pm

          On weekend evenings, when unwinding after another day full of jihad’s wonderful results, I crack open an adult beverage or five, and then dive into my stash of videos from Liveleak & Funker530.

          Check those puppies out — I guarantee smiles of satisfaction as Apache gunships use Hellfires and Barretts to send Allah’s advocates on to their virgins . . .

          * * * * * BTW, to Papa Whiskey and commenters here who enjoy tasty brews, PLEEEEZE try New Belgium’s Portage porter.

          Dark but not heavy, redolent with roasted coffee, chocolate, almonds. ABV of 6%, so it won’t demolish nice people, or lead to embarrassing episodes of incarceration. * * * * *

          CHEERS ! ! !

    • Alissa says

      Jan 16, 2015 at 11:04 pm

      What a great idea!! Rid the world of vermin and increase productivity at the same time. Very practical!

  3. mortimer says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 1:53 pm

    This mullah said, “According to the sacred texts, and by consensus of the Islamic scholars, those who curse the Prophet Muhammad should be killed…”

    Where did he get such UN-ISLAMIC IDEAS FROM?

    From Islamic Commentaries:
    -“Insulting the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is one of the worst of forbidden actions… whether done seriously or in jest. The one who does that is to be EXECUTED even if he repents and whether he is a Muslim or a kaafir.” – Al-Saarim al-Maslool, 2/438
    -as-Suyuti writes: “(If they break their oaths…) This ayah (K. 9:11-12) is used as a proof by those who say that if a dhimmi attacks Islam or the Qur’an or mentions the Prophet in a bad manner, HE IS KILLED, whether he has broken a treaty or not. Those who say that his repentance is accepted use as a proof, “hopefully they will stop.”” …(after being killed)
    -“(And if they) the people of Mecca (break their pledges) which are between you and them (after their treaty (has been made with you) and assail your religion) and DEFAME the Religion of Islam, (then FIGHT the heads of disbelief) FIGHT (q-t-l) the leaders of disbelief: Abu Sufyan and his host. (Lo! they have no binding oaths in order that they may desist) from breaking their pledges.” -Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs
    -“It is related that a man forged lies against the Prophet and he sent ‘Ali and az-Zubayr to kill him. Ibn Qani’ related that a man came to the Prophet and said, “Messenger of Allah, I heard my father say something ugly about you, so I killed him,” and that did not distress the Prophet. – Hadith
    Koranic Verses Censoring Criticism of Islam:
    -K.2:193. “And FIGHT (q-t-l) them until there is no more Fitnah” (disagreeing with Mohammed), i.e. fight and kill disbelievers until no one expresses disagreement with Mohammed.
    -K.9:11-12 “But if they violate their oaths after their covenant, and TAUNT YOU for your Faith, – FIGHT ye the chiefs of Unfaith, for their oaths are nothing to them, that thus they may be restrained.”
    -K.11.173 “Believers, retaliation is decreed for you in BLOODSHED.”
    -K.58:5 “Those who oppose Allah and His Messenger will be laid low”…with violence.
    Approval of Vigilantism by Top Islamic Religious Authorities
    In 1993, top Sunni religious authorities from Al Azhar University confirmed that vigilantes may commit murder in the enforcement of Sharia law if the state does not do it. This means every single Muslim has implicit authorization from Islam’s top authorities to commit vigilante killing to defend Islam.
    From Sharia law manual Reliance of the Traveller:
    Sharia permits the murder of anyone who verbally opposes Islam, since they are at war with Islam:
    “There is no indemnity obligatory for killing a non-Muslim (harbi) at war with Muslims.” -Reliance of the Traveller, o4.17, p.593

    From the top authority in Islam, Al Azhar University:

    In 1992, Islamist militants gunned down Egyptian secularist and sharia law opponent Farag Foda. Before his death he had been declared an apostate and foe of Islam by ulama at Al Azhar. During the trial of the murderers, Al-Azhar scholar Mohammed al-Ghazali testified that when the state fails to punish apostates, somebody else has to do it. Al Azhar’s Grand Imam is the highest authority in Islam.

    • jihad3tracker says

      Jan 16, 2015 at 2:23 pm

      Hello again, Mortimer — Your abundant scholarship is always appreciated by me, and I am certain, hundreds of other visitors here to JW. Thanks for my first chuckle of the soon-coming weekend — that Guantanamo remark.

      Sheesh — even the imams in Allah’s Army must have gotten into an amphetamine stash or revved up the espresso machine . . . They are in overdrive, but don’t realize how transparently their references to Paris connect Islamic violence to the commentaries.

      Looks like the stealthy sneaky gradual encroachment to a caliphate got tossed out of a nearby window, along with an “F” in competent strategy. Of course, when one channels Muhammed, as they do, subtlety fades pretty fast..

    • Holy Prophet APF says

      Jan 16, 2015 at 3:19 pm

      “Insulting the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is one of the worst of forbidden actions… whether done seriously or in jest. The one who does that is to be EXECUTED even if he repents and whether he is a Muslim or a kaafir.” – Al-Saarim al-Maslool, 2/438

      Erdogan just gave a speech declaring that Moslems are paying the price for the Hebdo mass murder. He said that Moslems never supported that action, or any terrorism.

      Analysis of Erdogan’s speech: Murder in retribution for insulting the Holy Prophet Mohammed is in the scriptures. After being lampooned by Abu Afak, he had him gutted. After lampooning by Asma Marwan, he had her gutted. Either Prime Minister Erdogan is lying or he is unfamiliar with Islamic scripture. Either way, he is our NATO ally.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 19, 2015 at 1:07 pm

      Another fine post, Mortimer.

  4. Champ says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 2:00 pm

    Obama’s claim that “we are not at war with islam” sure ring hollow, don’t they? Well, islam and company are at war with *everyone*, really.

    • Champ says

      Jan 16, 2015 at 2:04 pm

      o0ps: obama’s “words”, not claim.

  5. Ashley says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 2:10 pm

    OT: This just in:

    President Obama: Parts of Europe need to better integrate Muslim communities in the wake of Paris attacks; ‘it’s important for Europe not to simply respond with a hammer and law enforcement and military approaches to these problems’ – @AFP
    _______________________

    Wow. Just wow.

    • Champ says

      Jan 16, 2015 at 2:20 pm

      Imam obama …

      http://rightwingart.com/artuploads/image1/d93aa852-b045-49d2-9660-021770636435.png

    • Ross says

      Jan 16, 2015 at 2:27 pm

      Sorry, Muslims have proven that they don’t play well with others.

      • Angemon says

        Jan 16, 2015 at 4:40 pm

        They don’t even play well with one another…

    • Bezelel says

      Jan 16, 2015 at 3:31 pm

      Cleobama the queen of denial.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 19, 2015 at 1:17 pm

      I heard that egregious crap from Obama as well, Ashley.

      The fact is that the only reason the Jihad is not as bad in the US as it is in places like France is that France has a Muslim population approaching 10%, and the US has a Muslim population of under 1%.

      If—God forbid!—we ever have as many ravening Mohammedans here, I think Obama and others will find that they aren’t so “well integrated” after all.

      Even with this level of supposed “integration”, of course, we have still had such atrocitis as the Ft. Hood Massacre and the Boston Marathon Bombing, along with thousands of foiled Jihad plots.

      It doesn’t look as though it’s going to get any better…

  6. profitsbeard says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 3:17 pm

    Those who call for the deaths of people who criticize their violent dogmas should be expunged from the planet.

    There is no room in Civilization from proselytizing homicidal maniacs.

    ISLAM DELENDA EST.

    • Greyhound Fancier says

      Jan 16, 2015 at 10:48 pm

      What a shame if Muslims did take over France…think anyone would come for tourism? What would happen to the Louvre, the Musee d’Orsay, Versailles, Chartres and the other cathedrals?

      It wouldn’t take long before La Belle France was turned into just another Islamic hellhole. What a pity!

      I think the whole Islamic system such as it is stops working when too many people become Muslim. When they lose the Christians and Jews, who does the skilled work, and who does the work period? If the Muslims in Europe are any representative sample, Muslim men, most of them, don’t set the world on fire with their work ethic.

      If the Christians and Jews don’t continue working and creating, the conquered area sooner or later assumes the appearance, poverty, ignorance, and dysfunction of, say, the Ottoman Empire. The Muslim world can’t limp along without non-Muslims to pay the jizya, do the work, keep systems functioning, and generally picking up the trash. When the non-Muslims are gone, you have, e.g. Pakistan. What kind of world would we have if it was mostly or totally Muslim. Unthinkable!

      Wake up, world! An age of horror will commence if we don’t smarter up.

      • Dan Franzmann says

        Jan 17, 2015 at 5:51 am

        ‘What kind of world would we have if it was mostly or totally Muslim?’

        This kind.

        And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard, as it were the noise of thunder, one of the four beasts saying, Come and see.

        And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.

        And when he had opened the second seal, I heard the second beast say, Come and see.

        And there went out another horse that was red: and power was given to him that sat thereon to take peace from the earth, and that they should kill one another: and there was given unto him a great sword.

        And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the third beast say, Come and see. And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand.

        And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

        The first three stages of Islam. White horse(innocence) deceives with diplomacy. Upon gaining power, the other two follow(violence and financial ruin). Death, of course is the end result.

        And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.

        Christianity is the only weapon against Islam. With it being completely fragmented, our priority should be restoring it. Question the Trinity. Question Evolution. Expose Islam.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 19, 2015 at 1:25 pm

        Good point about what happens when a society becomes mostly Muslim.

        We can see *exactly* what this looks like—places like Afghanistan, Yemen, and Somalia. These are the most violent, illiterate, chaotic and stagnant Islamic hell holes, where there are no Infidels to do the work or offer any counter—no matter how suppressed—to the arid and oppressive hell of Islam.

  7. Bezelel says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 3:39 pm

    How do you curse a curse? moHAMed is a curse a scourge a phony a all round POS who’s body rotted in the ground. The only good thing moHAMed did was to die. His soul went straight to hell to be a concubine for satan. All muslims need to leave islam while there is still time.

    • Andrewp says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 2:46 pm

      What happened to the 72 virgins then? Funny how these people from the stone age religion insist on women being covered from head to toe yet can’t wait to meet 72 virgins!! Let’s hope they all look like Germaine Greer………

  8. Nunop says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 4:05 pm

    1. Having watched this video I have the impression that their God is not Allah but Muhammad…Why they do not see that? It is a very week and vulnerable god… they must defend it. What a pity…
    2. But, what am I saying….this video has nothing to do with islam 😉

  9. The renegade says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 5:42 pm

    “those who curse the Prophet Muhammad should be killed, regardless of whether or not they repent”

    But Muhammad can curse and hate every one he wants and who questions his lie – that he spoke with Gabriel or what ever hallucinations or mirages he saw in the hot deserts of arabia….. and dusty mountains where he wandered and got his message..

    almost sounds similar to story of Moses when he disappeared into the mountain and get God’s 10 commandments……

    there is nothing original about Islam, its all borrowed stuff

    – Mecca was an ancient temple that worshipped local diety and still is. Muslims bow and pray towards the stone tablets, they circumambulate around the square – Hinduism

    – Moon is back bone symbol and sign used for marking beginning of various festivals, used as a religious symbol atop moques etc. in Indian tradition moon sighting mark a lot of festivals – hinduism

    – in order to link with existing beliefs and to give it legitimacy, Muhammad said he spoke with Angel Gabriel and said he was last prophet and wove stories recognizing Jesus as prophet to put himself as final messenger;

    – muslims wash their feet before saying prayers – Hinduism
    – muslims were those dresses in mecca when performing haj similar to the sages , monks – hinduism
    – muslims shave head clean when they perform haj – this is very common practice when Hindus go on pilgrimage
    – muslims grow long beards to show piousness, hindus do this when they grow detached and leave materialistic life (Sanyas)
    – prostration pose for prayer – this is Vrajasana (yoga) pose – hinduism for high meditation
    – muslims count their prayers on beeds – Hindu sages use the beeds for concetration during meditation
    – in hindu philosphy in Vedas there is concept God being matter and also matterless/ formless;
    – prayer time 5 times a day was borrowed from Zorastrianism (Iranian religion before Islam)

    I can go on and on. Hindu history was present and stretched from Indonesian, Indo China and far away till Arabia and the reflection of similarities in uncanny….

    ISLAM IS A LIE!!!! WAS WAS BUILT ON SCRAPS COLLECTED FROM EVERY OTHER RELIGION re bottled as a NEW CONCEPT AND HAS NOTHING ORIGINAL ABOUT IT EXCEPT CONCEPTS LIKE HATING PEOPLE THAT DONT BELIEVE, JIHAD, OPPRESSIVE SHARIA, SLAVERY OF WOMEN ETC. THAT WAS SUITABLE FOR MUHAMMAD TO JUSTIFY HIS BARBARISM, BLOOD THIRST AND MAKE HIS WILDEST FANTASIES INTO REALITY….

    CURSE ISLAM AND MUHAMMAD!!!! HOPE HE IS ROTTING IN HELL.. 250 + MILLION HUMAN LIVES OVER 1400 YEARS AND STILL GOING ON LIKE A DURACEL BATTERY – ALL FOR A A LIE!!!!!

    QUIT ISLAM!!!!
    QUIT ISLAM.

  10. dumbledoresarmy says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 9:03 pm

    The French need to remember how *this* guy responded to Jihad.

    Charles de Martel, “The Hammer”.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tours#mediaviewer/File:Steuben_-_Bataille_de_Poitiers.png

    And *this* guy, in 1565.

    Jean Parisot de Valette.

    http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09047a.htm

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=466818&in_page_id=1770

    THE KNIGHTS OF ST JOHN OF MALTA
    History’s bloodiest siege used human heads as cannonballs
    By JAMES JACKSON

  11. gp says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 9:07 pm

    Every mosque is a “potential” jihadist recruiting center. Political correctness and multiculturalism has allowed the fox into the hen house.

    When you drive by a mosque do you see a Trojan Horse?

    Specifically, how is a mosque a threat to the community within which it is built?
    Every single mosque in the world, by definition, is modeled on the mosque of Muhammad in Medina in accordance with the Sunnah. The Sunnah interprets the Qur’an by reporting exhaustively on everything that Muhammad said, did, or consented to. Therefore, his Medina mosque, the first mosque, was a place where he gave judgments, where he decided who would be executed, where he instituted policy—domestic and military— where Jihad war strategies were designed. Consequently, it was a storage place for arms, a military training base, and was where troops were blessed and dispatched. Literally they were sent to conquer – first the whole of Arabia, and then the rest of the known world. Therefore if the present-day mosque is modeled as per the Sunnah of Muhammad then there should be very serious concern. As is well-known, Muslims are required to follow the example (Sunnah) of Muhammad—and according to Sura 33:36 it is not an option or a matter of opinion: “It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error.” This explains and establishes beyond doubt why arms have been found in mosques in various countries, and in different capital cities.
    In addition to the undisputed significance of the Medina mosque as the role model for all Mosques, there is also the Islamic policy of establishing strategic Mosques as beachheads with interconnected networks. Taken together, these two policies do constitute a clear and present danger—and a need for concern.
    For example, when Abu Hamza[1] was the Imam of the Finsbury Park mosque in the United Kingdom, he trained people, he sent out terrorists and British authorities found arms stored there. He was well within his Islamic mandate as these activities were sanctioned by Islam. He didn’t find it wrong because it is in the Islamic manuals. Another prime example of a mosque being found to have engaged in high-level political, military and intelligence activities is the Munich Mosque, which is now considered by Islamists to be on a par with some of highest-ranked Mosques in Muslim countries.
    Sam Solomon-former professor of Sharia Law

    • Betty says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 11:13 am

      from what I have heard they are building the largest mosque in the US in Florida and I think it will be in Tampa. tell me some thing how is it they have to have welfare to live in AMERICA and free schooling and medical and any thing else they can come up with. but they have the money to build these huge mosque in every state? I WILL say from the oil fields. and not the ones in AMERICA ETHER.

  12. Dracula says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 10:26 pm

    Yeesh, Suleiman and Saladin these folks ain’t.

  13. Joe Shmo says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 10:31 pm

    These guys never stop turning my stomach.

  14. Myxlplik says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 11:06 pm

    I’m not sure if Islam has anything to do with this, but this is the dumbest thing I’ve ever seen… maybe the Saudis should make it illegal for men to drive as well.

    http://youtu.be/ctMivHqJ5vg

  15. Matthieu Baudin says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 12:26 am

    Dear Cleric Kamal Zarouq, please watch out that your sword doesn’t cut through the electrical cable holding the light bulb – it could seriously endanger your safety.

  16. dlbrand says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 2:15 am

    Some people curse the Prophet Muhammad, yet there are people who do not want the Islamic nation to and kill them. According to the sacred texts, and by consensus of the Islamic scholars, those who curse the Prophet Muhammad should be killed, regardless of whether or not they repent. Those who curse the Prophet should be killed.

    Well of course.

    Part Four

    The judgements concerning those who think
    the Prophet imperfect or curse him

    Section One

    The Judgement of the Shari’a regarding someone
    who curses or disparages the Prophet

    Know that all who curse Muhammad, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, or blame him or attribute imperfection to him in his person, his lineage, his deen or any of his qualities, or alludes to that or its like by any means whatsoever, whether in the form of a curse or contempt or belittling him or detracting from him or finding fault with him or maligning him, the judgement regarding such a person is the same as the judgement against anyone who curses him. He is killed as we shall make clear. This judgement extends to anything which amounts to a curse or disparagement. We have no hesitation concerning this matter, be it a clear statement or allusion.

    The same applies to anyone who curses him, invokes against him, desires to harm him, ascribes to him what does not befit his position or jokes about his mighty affair with foolish talk, satire, disliked words or jies, or reviles him because of any affliction or trial which happened to him or disparages him, because of any of the permissible and well-known human events which happened to him. All of this is the consensus of the ‘ularna’ and the imams of fatwa from the time of the Companions until today.

    …………………..

    Ibn al-Qasim said in the ‘Utibiyya, “Anyone who curses him, reviles him, finds fault with him or disparages him is killed. The community say that he should be killed just like the dualist. Allah made it obligatory to respect the Prophet and be dutiful to him.”

    In the Mabsut from ‘Uthman ibn Kinana we find, “Any Muslim who reviles the Prophet is killed or crucified without being asked to repent. The Imam can choose between crucifying him or killing him.” In the variant of Abu’l-Mus’ab and Ibn Abi Uways, they heard Malik say, “Anyone who curses the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, reviles him, finds fault with him or disparages him is killed, be he Muslim or unbeliever, without being asked to repent.”

    Asbagh said, “He is killed in every case, whether he conceals it or makes it public, without being asked to repent because his repentance is not recognised.” ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abdu’l-Hakam said that and at-Tabari related something similar from Malik Ibn Wahb related that Malik said, “Anyone who says that the Prophet’s cloak (or button) was dirty, thereby intending to find fault with him, should be killed.”
    ……………….

    http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/misc/alshifa/pt4ch1sec1.htm

  17. tgusa says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 2:49 am

    All you do talk talk.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hHnOBlwU3A.
    Well, that and ambush murder the weak and defenseless among us.
    Molon Labe.

  18. Salah says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 3:19 am

    “We shall chop off the head of France, with a sword that bears the words: ‘There is no god but Allah.’”

    This guy is shouting and yelling like a rabid dog for a reason, he KNOWS that this sword he’s talking about, this once-mighty sword of Islam, is getting shorter by the day.
    They are still able to kill a cartoonist or a writer every now and then, but look at the millions and millions of articles criticizing Muhammad all over the net. There’s no way they can silence all of us, and they know it, and they are enraged.
    It surely hurts when the sword of Islam strikes. It will always manage to strike someone, somewhere. Nevertheless, it is getting shorter and shorter by the day.
    Islam is fading away, it’s only a matter of time before it ceases to be a great power among men.

    http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/05/dying-islam-lislam-mourant.html

    • Matthieu Baudin says

      Jan 18, 2015 at 6:21 am

      And may you and Ali Sina live to see the day [when Islam] ” ceases to be a great power among men.”

  19. John says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 4:03 am

    I have just watched a video that demonstrates the evil that the world faces from resurgent, violent Islam. It shows, at length, a group of angry Islamic militia in Libya systematically desecrating, defacing and destroying the graves of Allied soldiers (from different non-Islamic faiths) who died there on operations in WW2. These soldiers were fighting for all that is good about Western democratic values and the freedom of the those territories from Nazi oppression and gave their lives.

    I have been quite neutral and objective in the debate over Islam. But such hypocrisy and evil shows that Islam cares not for reasonable debate or peaceful co-existence. They are driven by violent ideology that wishes to humiliate and dominate the West. And so many nations have graciously opened their borders to these people!

  20. duh_swami says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 4:54 am

    ‘The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam’.

    And all those super smart scholars agree. It’s really not that hard to understand, Rasool Obama understands it perfectly, and so does Hillary by the way.
    They know they can’t kill you for slander, so instead they will ‘redefine’ your free speech rights and put you in jail if you violate them.
    To them I give the middle finger salute…I don’t know them, and I don’t want to know them…

  21. Alan Webb says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 5:10 am

    As things stand at the moment, the mere mention of the words Muslim or Islam immediately results in some reaction that “offends” the people of Islam.

    So, in our Western society, why do we all never again even mention the words of Islam or Muslim? In any writing, legal documents, texts, receipts, birth, death, warrants, passports, media you name it. Deny the very existence of those that are easily offended.

    Why do we not call them Mad-Mullahs, instead.

  22. Lawrence Cross says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 5:49 am

    Be careful where you put the comma. OK, ‘there is no God but Allah’ because Allah is the Demon of the Ka’ba, not the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, or of Jesus their descendant..

  23. shabeer_hassan says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 11:09 am

    3: 159. And by the Mercy of Allâh, you dealt with them gently. And had you been severe and harsh¬hearted, they would have broken away from about you; so pass over (their faults), and ask (Allâh’s) Forgiveness for them; and consult them in the affairs. Then when you have taken a decision, put your trust in Allâh, certainly, Allâh loves those who put their trust (in Him).

    MUHAMMED(S) PROPHET OF MERCY,PROMOTING KINDNESS,PEACE & MERCY TO ALL

    Bukhari :: Book 9 :: Volume 84 :: Hadith 63
    Narrated ‘Abdullah:

    As if I am looking at the Prophet while he was speaking about one of the prophets whose people have beaten and wounded him, and he was wiping the blood off his face and saying, “O Lord! Forgive my, people as they do not know.”
    Bukhari :: Book 8 :: Volume 73 :: Hadith 80
    Narrated ‘Aisha:
    A man asked permission to enter upon Allah’s Apostle. The Prophet said, “Admit him. What an evil brother of his people or a son of his people.” But when the man entered, the Prophet spoke to him in a very polite manner. (And when that person left) I said, “O Allah’s Apostle! You had said what you had said, yet you spoke to him in a very polite manner?” The Prophet said, “O ‘Aisha! The worst people are those whom the people desert or leave in order to save themselves from their dirty language or from their transgression.”
    Bukhari :: Book 8 :: Volume 75 :: Hadith 398
    Narrated Anas:
    The most frequent invocation of The Prophet was: “O Allah! Give to us in the world that which is good and in the Hereafter that which is good, and save us from the torment of the Fire.” (2.201)

    21: 107. And We have sent you (O Muhammad SAW) not but as a mercy for the ‘Alamîn (mankind, jinns and all that exists).

    Prophet pray for his society even they hurt him:

    Bukhari :: Book 3 :: Volume 38 :: Hadith 512
    Bukhari :: Book 2 :: Volume 13 :: Hadith 55
    Muslim :: Book 35 : Hadith 6540 [mocking person]
    Muslim :: Book 1 : Hadith 392

    • dlbrand says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 4:57 pm

      Prophet pray for his society even they hurt him:
      Bukhari :: Book 3 :: Volume 38 :: Hadith 512
      Bukhari :: Book 2 :: Volume 13 :: Hadith 55
      Muslim :: Book 35 : Hadith 6540 [mocking person]
      Muslim :: Book 1 : Hadith 392

      Yes indeed he did–at first, when he was aiming to follow in the footsteps of Jesus, thus, practice, when reviled, turning the other cheek.

      But turning the other cheek is tough to do on one’s own absent the Spirit of Christ inside one, enabling one to do so. And that Muhammad lacked.

      For such reasons, the basis and accounts I will post below, found in the book of which it is said, “so highly [is it] admired throughout the Muslim world,” it has earned a sanctity of its own. Referring once more here to none other than, Ash-Shifa of Qadi Iyad.

      As I expect you know, shabeer_hassan, your scholars assert, so pleased and in agreement is Allah with the content of this book, it is said of it, “If Ash-Shifa is found in a house, this house will not suffer any harm,… when a sick person reads it or it is recited to him, Allah s.w.t. will restore his health.” (Hard cover Back cover.)

      On the author’s qualifications: Qadi Iyad was “Imam of his time in hadith and its science.” Known for being “tenacious in truth.” Multiple times, he was awarded, by his peers—the leading shaykhs, scholar, instructors of the din–the award of ijaz, which is, in brief, the award certifying one is qualified to teach others, in this case, teach Islam. (Biographical Note on the Author of the Shifa, P 510.)

      Therefore, on, as you say, examples of “MUHAMMED(S) PROPHET OF MERCY,PROMOTING KINDNESS,PEACE & MERCY TO ALL,” examples, of course, which then became sunnah–sunnah all Muslims must following and stubbornly cling to; I yield again to the record of such, as well as the Qur’an and Sunnah basis for such, provided in Ash-Shifa:

      Part Four

      The judgements concerning those who think
      the Prophet imperfect or curse him

      Section Two

      The proof of the necessity of killing anyone who
      curses the Prophet or finds fault with him

      The Qur’an says that Allah curses the one who harms the Prophet in this world and He connected harm of Himself to harm of the Prophet. There is no dispute that anyone who curses Allah is killed and that his curse demands that he be categorised as an unbeliever. The judgement of the unbeliever is that he is killed.

      Allah says, “Those who harm Allah and His Messenger, Allah has cursed them in this world and in the Next, and has prepared for them a humiliating punishment.” (33:57). He said something similar about those who kill the believers. Part of the curse on them in this world is that they are killed. Allah says, “Cursed they will be. Wherever they are found, they are seized and all slain.” (33: 61) He mentions the punishment of those who fight, “That is humiliation in this world for them.” (5:45) “Killing” (qatl) can have the meaning of “curse”.[6] Allah says, “May the conjecturers be killed!” (51:11) and “May Allah fight them! How they are perverted!” (9:30) i.e. may Allah curse them.

      This is because there is a difference between their harming Allah and His Messenger and harming the believers. Injuring the believers, short of murder, incurs beating and exemplary punishment. The judgement against those who harm Allah and His Prophet is more severe – the death penalty.

      Allah says, “No, by your Lord, they will not believe until they have you judge between them in what they disagree about.” (4:65) He removes the badge of belief from those who find an impediment in themselves against accepting the Prophet’s judgement and do not submit to him. Anyone who disparages him is opposing his judgement.

      Allah says, “O you who believe, do not raise your voices above the voice of the Prophet and be not loud in your speech to him as you are loud to one another lest your actions fail.” (49:3). Such an action only comes about through disbelief and the unbeliever is killed.

      Allah says, “When they come to you, they greet you with a greeting which Allah never greeted you with.” Then He says, “Jahannam is enough for them, an evil homecoming.” (58:9)

      Allah says, “Among them are those who harm the Prophet and say that he is all ear,” (9:61) and, “Those who harm the Messenger of Allah have a painful punishment.” (9:63)

      Allah says, “If you ask them, they will say, ‘We were only plunging and playing.’ Say, ‘What, were you then mocking Allah, His signs and His Messenger? Make no excuses. You have disbelieved after your belief.”‘ (9:67-68) The commentators say, “You have disbelieved” refers to what they have said about the Messenger of Allah.

      We have already mentioned the consensus. As for the traditions, al-Husayn ibn ‘Ali related from his father that the Messenger of Allah said in respect of this matter, “Whoever curses a Prophet, kill him. Whoever curses my Companions, beat him.”[7]

      In a sound hadith the Prophet commanded that Ka’b ibn al-Ashraf be killed. He asked, “Who will deal with Ka’b ibn al-Ashraf? He has harmed Allah and His Messenger.” He sent someone to assassinate him without calling him to Islam, in distinction to other idol-worshippers. The cause of that lay in his causing harm to the Prophet. That indicates that the Prophet had him killed for something other than idol-worship. It was for causing harm. Abu Rafi,’ who used to harm the Messenger of Allah and work against him, was also killed.

      Similarly on the Day of the Conquest, he ordered the killing of Ibn Khatal and his two slavegirls who used to sing his curses on the Prophet.

      In another hadith about a man who used to curse the Prophet, the Prophet said, “Who will save me from my enemy?” Khalid said, “I will,” so the Prophet sent him out and he killed him.

      Similarly the Prophet commanded that a group of unbelievers who used to injure and curse him, like an-Nadr ibn al-Harith and ‘Uqba ibn Abi Mu’ayt, be killed. He promised that a group of them would be killed before and after the conquest. They were all killed except for those who hurried to become Muslim before they were overpowered. Al-Bazzar related from Ibn ‘Abbas that ‘Uqba ibn Abi Mu’ayt cried out, “O company of Quraysh, why is it that I alone among you am to be killed without war?” The Prophet said, “For your disbelief and your forging lies against the Messenger of Allah.”

      ‘Abdu’r-Razzaq mentioned that a man cursed the Prophet, causing the Prophet to say, “Who will save me from my enemy?” Az-Zubayr said, “I will.” He sent az-Zubayr and he killed him.

      It is related that a woman used to curse the Prophet and he said, “Who will save me from my enemy?” Khalid ibn al-Walid went out and killed her.

      It is related that a man forged lies against the Prophet and he sent ‘Ali and az-Zubayr to kill him.
      Ibn Qani’ related that a man came to the Prophet and said, “Messenger of Allah, I heard my father say something ugly about you, so I killed him,” and that did not distress the Prophet.

      Al-Mujahir ibn Abi Umayya, the Amir of Yemen, reported to Abu Bakr that a woman there in the time of the Ridda[8]chanted curses against the Prophet, so he cut off her hand and pulled out her front teeth. When Abu Bakr heard that, he said to him, “If you had not done what you already did, I would have commanded you to kill her because the hadd regarding the Prophet is not like the hadd regarding others.”

      Ibn ‘Abbas said that a woman from Khatma[9] satirised the Prophet and the Prophet said, “Who will deal with her for me?” A man from her people said, “I will, Messenger of Allah.” The man got up and went and killed her. He told the Prophet who said, “Two goats will not lock horns over her.”[10]

      Ibn ‘Abbas said that a blind man had an umm walad who used to curse the Prophet. He scolded her and restrained her, but she would not be restrained. That night she began to attack and revile the Prophet, so he killed her. He told the Prophet about that and he said he had shed her blood with impunity.[11]

      In the hadith of Abu Barza as-Aslami it says, “One day I was sitting with Abu Bakr as-Siddiq and he became angry at one of the Muslim men.” Qadi Isma’il and other Imams said that the man had cursed Abu Bakr. An-Nasa’i related it as, “I came to Abu Bakr and a man had been rude and answered him back. I said, ‘Khalif of Allah, let me strike off his head!’ He said, ‘Sit down. That is not for anyone except the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace.’

      Qadi Abu Muhammad ibn Nasr said, “No one disagreed with him.” So the Imams take this, as a proof that anyone who does anything that might anger, harm or curse the Prophet in any way should be killed.

      There is also the letter of ‘Umar ibn ‘Abdu’l-‘Aziz to his governor in Kufa. He had asked his advice about killing a man who had cursed ‘Umar. ‘Umar wrote back to him, “It is not lawful to kill a Muslim for cursing anyone except the Messenger of Allah. Whoever curses him, his blood is lawful.”

      Harun ar-Rashid asked Malik about a man who had reviled the Prophet and he mentioned to him that the fuqaha’ of Iraq had given a fatwa that he be flogged. Malik became angry and said, “Amir al-Mu’minin! There is no continuation for a community after it curses its Prophet! Whoever curses the Companions of the Prophet is to be flogged.”

      I do not know which of those Iraqi fuqaha’ gave Harun ar-Rashid that fatwa. We have already mentioned that the school of the people of Iraq[12] is that he be killed. Perhaps they were among those who were not known for knowledge or those whose fatwas were unreliable or idiosyncratic, or it is possible that what the man said was not taken to be a curse and there was a dispute as to whether or not it was a curse or he had retracted it and repented of it. None of these things were mentioned to Malik at all. However, the consensus is that anyone who curses him is to be killed as we have already stated.

      That he is to be killed can be deduced by reflection and consideration. Anyone who curses or disparages the Prophet has shown clear symptoms of the sickness of his heart and proof of his real convictions and belief. That is why most of the ‘ulama’judge him to be an apostate. This is what is transmitted by the people of Syria from Malik, al-Awza’i, ath-Thawri, Abu Hanifa and the people of Kufa.

      The other position is that it is not a proof of disbelief, and so the person in question is killed by the hadd-punishment but he is not adjudged to be an unbeliever unless he persists in his words, not denying them nor refraining from them. To be judged an unbeliever, his statement must either be a clear statement of disbelief, like calling the Prophet a liar, or originate from mocking words and censure. His open avowal of what he said and lack of repentance for it is an indication that he finds it lawful and this constitutes disbelief, so there is no disagreement that he is an unbeliever. Allah says about people like this, “They swear by Allah that they did not speak. They said the words of disbelief. They disbelieved after their Islam.” (9:76)

      The commentators said that this refers to the statement, “If what is said by Muhammad is true,[13] we are worse than monkeys.”

      It is said that it refers to what one of them[14] said, “Our likeness with respect to that of Muhammad is only as the words of the one who says, ‘Feed your dog and it will devour you.’ When we return to Madina, the mighty will drive out the weaker.”

      It is said that even if the one who says this conceals it, the same judgement applies to him as to the heretic and he is killed because he has changed his deen.The Prophet said, “Strike off the heads of all who change their deen.”

      Because upholding the Prophet’s honour is an obligation owed by his entire community and anyone who curses a free man of his community is given a hadd-punishment, the punishment of someone who curses the Prophet is that he is to be is killed because of the immensity of the worth of the Prophet and his elevation over others.

      http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/misc/alshifa/pt4ch1sec2.htm

      (Muhammad Messenger of Allah, Ash-Shifa of Qadi ‘Iyad Ibn Musa al-Yasubi, , Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley translation, Medinah Press, Cape Town, South Africa, Seventh print, 2008, 1429H, pp. 376 – 380.)

      And now, a few examples of his followers obeying his command, “Take your practices from me”:

      Muhammad ibn Sahnun said that the ‘ulama’ agree that anyone who reviles the Prophet and disparages him is an unbeliever and the threat of Allah’s punishment is on him. The community’s judgement on him is that he be killed. Anyone who has any doubts about such a person’s disbelief and punishment is also an unbeliever. For a proof of this, Ibrahim ibn Husayn ibn Khalid, the faqih, uses the instance of Khalid ibn al-Walid killing Malik ibn Nuwayra for referring to the Prophet as “your companion.”‘[3]

      Abu Sulayman al-Khattabi said, “I do not know of any Muslim who disagrees about the necessity of killing such a person if he is a Muslim.”

      Ibn al-Qasim reports from Malik in the book of Ibn Sahnun, the Mabsut, and the’Utibiyya and Ibn Mutarrif relates the same from Malik in the book of Ibn Habib, “Any Muslim who curses the Prophet is killed without being asked to repent.”

      Ibn al-Qasim said in the ‘Utibiyya, “Anyone who curses him, reviles him, finds fault with him or disparages him is killed. The community say that he should be killed just like the dualist. Allah made it obligatory to respect the Prophet and be dutiful to him.”

      In the Mabsut from ‘Uthman ibn Kinana we find, “Any Muslim who reviles the Prophet is killed or crucified without being asked to repent. The Imam can choose between crucifying him or killing him.” In the variant of Abu’l-Mus’ab and Ibn Abi Uways, they heard Malik say, “Anyone who curses the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, reviles him, finds fault with him or disparages him is killed, be he Muslim or unbeliever, without being asked to repent.”

      Asbagh said, “He is killed in every case, whether he conceals it or makes it public, without being asked to repent because his repentance is not recognised.” ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Abdu’l-Hakam said that and at-Tabari related something similar from Malik Ibn Wahb related that Malik said, “Anyone who says that the Prophet’s cloak (or button) was dirty, thereby intending to find fault with him, should be killed.”
      One of our ‘ulama says that people agree that anyone who curses any of the Prophets using the expression “Woe to him” or anything disliked is to be killed without being asked to repent.

      Abu’l-Hasan al-Qabisi gave a fatwa that a man who called the Prophet “the porter, the orphan of Abu Talib” should be killed.

      Abu Muhammad ibn Abi Zayd gave a fatwa to kill a man who was listening to some people discussing what the Prophet looked like. When a man with an ugly face and beard walked by, he said to them, “You want to know what he looked like? He looked like this passer-by in physique and beard.” Abu Muhammad said, “His repentance is not accepted. He lied, may Allah curse him. That could not come out of a heart with sound belief.”

      Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, the companion of Sahnun, said, “Anyone who says that the Prophet was black should be killed.”

      He was told about a man to whom someone said, “No, by the right of the Messenger of Allah,” and he replied, “Allah did such a thing to the Messenger of Allah,” mentioning some ugly words. People said to him, “What are you saying, enemy of Allah?” Then he said some even harsher things and added, “I wish for a scorpion for the Messenger of Allah.” When someone asked him for fatwa about this man, lbn Abi Sulayman said, “Testify against him and I will be your partner,” i.e. in killing him and getting the reward.

      Habib ibn ar-Rabi’ said that is because trying to explain away the literal expression is not accepted because it is clear contempt and lack of respect for the Messenger of Allah. His blood is permitted.

      Abu ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Attab gave a fatwa about a tax-collector who said to a man, “Pay and complain to the Prophet. If I ask or am ignorant, the Prophet was ignorant and asked,” to the effect that he be killed.

      The fuqaha’ of Andalusia gave a fatwa that Ibn Ha tim, the scholar of Toledo, be killed and crucified because there was testimony that he made light of what is due to the Prophet. In the course of a debate, he called him “the orphan” and the in-law of the lion (i.e. ‘Ali),” and claimed that his doing-without (zuhd) las not intentional. He alleged that if he had been able to have good things, he would have eaten them. He said other similar things.

      The fuqaha’ of the Qayrawan[4] and the companions of Sahnun gave a fatwa forthe killing of Ibrahim al-Ghazari, a poet and master of many sciences. He was one of those who attended the assembly of Qadi Abu’l-‘Abbas ibn Talib for debate. He was accused of objectionable things like mocking Allah, His Prophets and our Prophet. Qadi Yahya ibn ‘Umar and other fuqaha’ summoned him and commanded that he be killed and crucified. He was stabbed and crucified upside down. Then he was brought down and burned. One of the historians related that when the post to which he was tied was lifted up, the body turned around away from qibja. It was a sign to all and the people said, “Allah is greater!” Then a dog came and licked his blood. Yahya ibn ‘Umar said, “The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, spoke the truth,” and he mentioned a hadith in which the Prophet said, “A dog will not lick a Muslim’s blood.”[5]

      Qadi Abu ‘Abdullah ibn al-Murabit said, “Whoever says that the Prophet was defeated is asked to repent. If he repents, it is all right. If not, he is killed because it detracts from the Prophet. Such a disparaging remark could not be said about the Prophet by anyone with understanding of his affair and certainty about his inviolability.”

      Habib ibn Rabi’ al-Qarawi said that the school of Malik and his companions is that anyone who says anything disparaging about the Prophet is killed without being asked to repent.

      Ibn ‘Attab said that the Book and Sunna require that someone who intends to even slightly harm or disparage the Prophet, either by allusion or clear statement, must be killed.

      Anything like this which is something that the ‘ulama’ consider to be a curse or disparagement necessitates that the one who says it be killed. Neither the early or later people disagree about that, but they disagree about the basis for killing him as we have indicated. We will make this clear later.

      This is also my position regarding the judgment of anyone who belittles him or insults him about having been a shepherd, oversight, forgetfulness, sorcery, any wound he received, the defeat of one of his armies, injury by an enemy, the intensity of his illness or his being attracted to his wives. The judgement of all this is that the one who intends to disparage him by it is killed. The position of the’ulama’ is as we have already stated and it will be proved by what follows.

      http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/misc/alshifa/pt4ch1sec1.htm

      (Hard copy, Ash-Shifa, Ibid, pp. 375, 376.)

    • Angemon says

      Jan 18, 2015 at 4:39 pm

      shabeer_hassan posted:

      “MUHAMMED(S) PROPHET OF MERCY,PROMOTING KINDNESS,PEACE & MERCY TO ALL”

      Narrated Ibn ‘Umar:

      Allah’s Apostle said: “I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform a that, then they save their lives an property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 2, Number 24)

      Narrated Anas bin Malik:

      Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387)

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 19, 2015 at 2:35 pm

      More spam from the meretricious shabeer hassan:

      3: 159. And by the Mercy of Allâh, you dealt with them gently.
      ………………………………….

      This is, of course, an abrogated verse, as shabeer hassan well knows. Muslims don’t “deal gently” with Infidels wherever the gain sufficient numbers.

      More:

      MUHAMMED(S) PROPHET OF MERCY,PROMOTING KINDNESS,PEACE & MERCY TO ALL
      ………………………………….

      Again, this was only early on. Once the baleful “Prophet” had enough followers, he regularly had his critics, such as the poet and nursing mother Asma bint Marwan, assassinated:

      “SARIYYAH OF `UMAYR IBN `ADI
      Then (occurred) the sariyyah of `Umayr ibn `Adi Ibn Kharashah al-Khatmi against `Asma’ Bint Marwan, of Banu Umayyah Ibn Zayd, when five nights had remained from the month of Ramadan, in the beginning of the nineteenth month from the hijrah of the apostle of Allah. `Asma’ was the wife of Yazid Ibn Zayd Ibn Hisn al-Khatmi. She used to revile Islam, offend the prophet and instigate the (people) against him. She composed verses. Umayr Ibn Adi came to her in the night and entered her house. Her children were sleeping around her. There was one whom she was suckling. He searched her with his hand because he was blind, and separated the child from her. He thrust his sword in her chest till it pierced up to her back. Then he offered the morning prayers with the prophet at al-Medina. The apostle of Allah said to him: “Have you slain the daughter of Marwan?” He said: “Yes. Is there something more for me to do?” He [Muhammad] said: “No. Two goats will butt together about her. This was the word that was first heard from the apostle of Allah. The apostle of Allah called him `Umayr, “basir” (the seeing).”

      Her “crime” was criticizing Mohammed’s assassination of another victim, Abu Afak. He was an elderly Jewish poet who refused to convert to Islam and wrote poems critical of it. This set a pattern early on—that if anyone dared to criticize the violence of Islam, they were apt to fall prey to it, as well.

      She was hardly the only victim of Muhammed and his murderous thugs.

      More:

      As if I am looking at the Prophet while he was speaking about one of the prophets whose people have beaten and wounded him, and he was wiping the blood off his face and saying, “O Lord! Forgive my, people as they do not know.”
      ………………………………….

      This last line, of course, is a direct theft from the words of Jesus Christ. Later, of course, Muhammed would no longer take Jesus as his model—even as a pose—but other homicidal warlords such as Attila the Hun.

      More:

      The most frequent invocation of The Prophet was: “O Allah! Give to us in the world that which is good and in the Hereafter that which is good, and save us from the torment of the Fire.” (2.201)

      21: 107. And We have sent you (O Muhammad SAW) not but as a mercy for the ‘Alamîn (mankind, jinns and all that exists).
      ………………………………….

      The above Qur’anic verses are not about Muslims treating anyone mercifully—they regard *anything* that spreads Islam to be a “mercy”. Islam need not be spread mercifully—and, indeed, in most cases is not.

      And what is “good” in Islam? Anything the “Prophet” did, including raping a little girl, stoning women, assassinating poets, enslaving victims, and committing genocide.

      More:

      Prophet pray for his society even they hurt him…
      ………………………………….

      Even if the “Prophet” hadn’t had all of his critics assassinated, and was truly the Christ-like fellow shabeer hassan insists he was—never mind that the texts and tenets of his own faith clearly give the lie to this—the question remains: why isn’t shabeer hassan trying to convince Muslims like Kamal Zarouq, who believe that anyone who dares criticize the “prophet” must be murdered, that they are getting things so very, very wrong?

      This is, of course, because this false whitewash of Islam is not intended for Muslims at all—instead, it is aimed at the “filthy Kuffar”.

      shabeer hassan hopes that if he can—against all evidence—convince Infidels that Islam is indeed the “religion of peace”, that they will do nothing to defend themselves from his ravening coreligonists until it is too late.

      • Angemon says

        Jan 19, 2015 at 3:53 pm

        Splendid post, GI.

  24. Rafael-Olivier Somma says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 8:46 pm

    I can insult their fucking prophet because I don’t give a shit about that pedophile and also because I’m not a muslim.

  25. DianaS says

    Jan 18, 2015 at 2:40 am

    Diana S 8 hours ago
    4

  26. DianaS says

    Jan 18, 2015 at 2:43 am

    Leviticus 26: 3 If ye walk in my statutes, and keep my commandments, and do them; [4] Then I will give you rain in due season, and the land shall yield her increase, and the trees of the field shall yield their fruit. [5] And your threshing shall reach unto the vintage, and the vintage shall reach unto the sowing time: and ye shall eat your bread to the full, and dwell in your land safely.
    [6] And I will give peace in the land, and ye shall lie down, and none shall make you afraid: and I will rid evil beasts out of the land, neither shall the sword go through your land. [7] And ye shall chase your enemies, and they shall fall before you by the sword.

    [14] But if ye will not hearken unto me, and will not do all these commandments; [15] And if ye shall despise my statutes, or if your soul abhor my judgments,…[16] I also will do this unto you;I will even appoint over you terror, consumption, and the burning ague, that shall consume the eyes, and cause sorrow of heart: and ye shall sow your seed in vain, for your enemies shall eat it.
    [17] And I will set my face against you, and ye shall be slain before your enemies: they that hate you shall reign over you; and ye shall flee when none pursueth you. [19] And I will break the pride of your power; and I will make your heaven as iron, and your earth as brass:
    [25] And I will bring a sword upon you, that shall avenge the quarrel of my covenant: and when ye are gathered together within your cities, I will send the pestilence among you; and ye shall be delivered into the hand of the enemy.

  27. michael says

    Jan 18, 2015 at 4:05 am

    Islam is from the devil

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Michael Copeland on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • Dude on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.