Our long national nightmare is over: after the worst DDoS attack I have ever seen, knocking her site offline for two weeks, freedom fighter Pamela Geller’s website at pamelageller.com is back. Bookmark it, and visit often.
Tech experts faced an attack of a ferocity that was far beyond anything any of them had ever dealt with before — a vivid demonstration of how much the forces of jihad oppression hate and fear Pamela Geller for the light of truth that she shines on them.
Heartfelt thanks to all who contributed to the prohibitive costs involved in getting the site back online. You helped deny the pro-jihad thugs a victory. Pamela Geller is one of the foremost defenders of freedom today. What happened to her website is an unconscionable assault on the freedom of speech and efforts to tell truth about jihad. We should all be deeply grateful for her stand for freedom. And if you were not yet able to contribute, it isn’t too late. The costs of this attack have been astronomical — please contribute to the fund to pay for all this tech work here.
Pamela Geller says
Robert, Thank you for all your help. You are a magnificent friend and colleague.
And thank you to all of your readers who supported me through this IT nightmare.
Freedom!
Mo says
Glad you’re back, Pamela! We love you!
Champ says
Glad you’re back, Pamela! We love you!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Second that! ❤
dlbrand says
Hey, Pamela.
Congratulations.
cathy says
Hurray!……..Strange thing is your e-mails still came showed up so the information never stopped.
shrugger says
YAY!!
Pamela Geller says
Shrugger! Love the nic 🙂
Angemon says
Good to know 😀
Bill says
Missed you Pam. However I hope that you get more funding from the great and the good.
You and Robert do such a great job.
jihad3tracker says
The courageous tireless 24/7 counter-jihadist Super-Duper Pam should consider all the effort required to take down her website as the highest compliment Mohammed’s minions could possibly award.
The little fish are ignored — only the biggest threats to Truth have time and energy devoted to them . . .And let us remember that this recovery will only make her stronger and wiser.
HEY MUSLIMES — NICE TRY — BUT ULTIMATELY IT WAS A BIG F*CKIN’ FAILURE !
Lookmann says
Still in the works , it seems . Clicking on the last post in the first page shows ‘page not found’.
Pamela Geller says
Where exactly? Last night’s import on new posts didn’t work so that might be the dead link. Where exactly is the link you are referring to, L?
Mirren10 says
I’d love to contribute, but when I click on the link Mr Spencer provided, the below comes up.
Sorry — your last action could not be completed
wildjew says
Great!
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Where are the prosecutions? Are there any serious investigations?
It is telling that, for all the thousands of hacks and DOS attacks reported over the years, I’m not sure I’ve heard of a single arrest and prosecution of a cyber criminal. I’ve been in the computer business for three decades and am the author of a book on the Internet’s technical infrastructure, and tell you that the reason for this is that the Internet relies on open protocols to keep things open. The base protocol TCP/IP can never be got rid of, and it shouldn’t. But that can’t be said for HTTP, the primary culprit in the endless abuse of the Web.
I say all this because of a striking parallel: Infidel society has its own HTTP that leaves it open and defenseless to attack. Substitute tolerance for HTTP, and substitute Moslems for hacker intrusions and DOS attacks, and you’ve got the situation in which we teeter today.
We’ve got FBI agents designed to fight Cold War communist aggression and old fashioned scams instead of cybercrime. We’ve got state of the art jet fighters that fly by mujahidin at 3,000 MPH, unable to stem their tide.
Either way, we pass noisily by and they march forward with purposeful aggression.
AnneM says
Also it would not be surprising if such stuff take place overseas as well so that is why it is hard to track down and throw the book at.
Bezelel says
John 3: 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. [3] 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
I have NO doubt that supporting you Pamela is the right thing to do.
duh_swami says
‘You are so beautiful to me’…’Your everything I dream of, everything I need, you are so beautiful to me’…
A little mushy but totally deserving…The enemies of freedom tried to destroy
beauty, and they failed…again…If I put my ear to the ground, I can hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth coming from CAIR corporate offices…
Walter Sieruk says
Pamela Geller is right . . Not only in her cause but also to get back on line to keep getting the truth out to the public. As Thomas Jefferson had stated “Fortitude…teaches us to meet and surmount difficulties; not to fly from them.”
Tim says
Nope, its not. I still get the site offline.
Champ says
This is such great news!!! …and I clicked on pamelageller.com and it works just fine.
In the end, freedom and truth lovers always win!! …so take note islam & company.
Semeru says
Did take her long to start the bullshit
Here she reports an article
19-year-old Zac Evans was hacked to death with a machete outside a pub in Gloucester early Saturday morning in an attack that left another two men with serious injuries.
Details are yet to emerge but suspicions are that Zac may have been beheaded by an Islamic extremist.
This attack bares obvious similarities to the attack in Finland recently by a Somali immigrant who attacked three men outside a pub with a machete.
British press have as usual not given any clue as to the perpetrators identity which usually means the attacker is an immigrant, possibly Muslim.
Is this the start of a wave of machete Jihad attacks on European people outside pubs?
A pub car park may seem like an ideal location for Jihadists to, as the Quran commands, “lie in wait and ambush disbelievers”:
Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war. Qur’an: 9:5
Sahih International: So when you meet those who disbelieve, smite their necks until you have inflicted slaughter upon them.
Gloucester has a large Muslim population so it is reasonable to suspect that this attack was carried out by Muslims.
The murderer turns out to be
Ewen Anthony Reynolds, 44, of Foley Close, Tuffley, will appear before magistrates in Cheltenham tomorrow charged with Zac’s murder and attempted murder in relation to an assault on a second man during the same incident.
http://www.gloucestercitizen.co.uk/Gloucester-man-44-charged-murder-Zac-Evans/story-25924844-detail/story.html
Angemon says
semeu, is there any point to your comment or are you just randomly quoting from a news article and accusing PG of “starting bullshit”?
Semeru says
Not randomly quoting from news article, just quoting what Geller published on her site
Angemon says
Semeru posted:
“Not randomly quoting from news article, just quoting what Geller published on her site”
Well, I see quote and a link in your post, and it’s not from Geller’s site:
“Ewen Anthony Reynolds, 44, of Foley Close, Tuffley, will appear before magistrates in Cheltenham tomorrow charged with Zac’s murder and attempted murder in relation to an assault on a second man during the same incident.
http://www.gloucestercitizen.co.uk/Gloucester-man-44-charged-murder-Zac-Evans/story-25924844-detail/story.html”
Could you prove you quoted that from Geller’s site? And if you’re just quoting from her site then you’re just randomly insulting her when you claim that she’s “starting bullshit”.
Mo says
@ Angemon
She did have the story on her site:
http://pamelageller.com/2015/01/machete-jihad-19-year-old-non-muslim-hacked-to-death-outside-pub-in-uk.html/
But from what I can see, she got the information from this story, which did identify it as a jihad attack:
https://dailyeuropa.wordpress.com/2015/01/24/machete-jihad-19-year-old-hacked-to-death-outside-pub-in-gloucester/
But now there’s the other story, which says it may be another situation entirely:
http://www.gloucestercitizen.co.uk/Gloucester-man-44-charged-murder-Zac-Evans/story-25924844-detail/story.html
I don’t know what the right account is yet. But if that last story is accurate, then it could be just a simple error. It happens.
But of course Muslims like Semeru are going to use any errors against all anti-jihad efforts, forevermore.
Angemon says
Mo posted:
“But of course Muslims like Semeru are going to use any errors against all anti-jihad efforts, forevermore.”
Where I was getting at is that semeru was hoping to pass a big, fat, lie. He’d have us believe that Pamela stated that a muslim was the culprit, which she didn’t. There’s no other way or context in that his original post makes sense. And he’s assuring us that the culprit is not a muslim when nothing in the other article says that.
Basically, what he did was no different in nature of what he accused Mrs. Geller of.
Mo says
@ Angemon
“And he’s assuring us that the culprit is not a muslim when nothing in the other article says that.”
Ah, yes. I suppose he still could be a Muslim even though the last article doesn’t say so. (Silly me, I still suffer from the assumption that journalists always post the full story.) It could still have been a jihad attack. Or it could not be.
My main point was that Pamela was not deliberately posting stories she knew to be false, which was Semeru’s accusation. I also wanted to put all three stories out there so everyone could quickly have them in one spot.
In any event, Semeru is just starting up trouble, as per usual.
Angemon says
Mo posted:
“My main point was that Pamela was not deliberately posting stories she knew to be false, which was Semeru’s accusation.”
Yup. It’s something he does usually here (especially ion Dr. Sennels’ posts), so much so that another JWer (don vito, IIRC) has stated, on more than one occasion, something along the lines of “this story has passed the semeru test, therefore it’s 100% true”.
Mo says
@ Angemon
“so much so that another JWer (don vito, IIRC) has stated, on more than one occasion, something along the lines of “this story has passed the semeru test, therefore it’s 100% true”.
Ha!
Champ says
Bravo, Mo! …excellent comment.
Semeru says
What a pair of jokers
Mo writes I don’t know what the right account is yet. But if that last story is accurate, then it could be just a simple error. It happens.,/I>
A simple error, no no Geller took the article from a rather dubious and obscure site, rather than take from more creditable site which was reporting the crime
Geller has now put up a disclaimer, but the original article still remains
Mo posted
“My main point was that Pamela was not deliberately posting stories she knew to be false, which was Semeru’s accusation.”
Ah she has a nasty habit of deliberately posting stories that are not true
Mo says
@ Semeru
“Ah she has a nasty habit of deliberately posting stories that are not true”
No, that would be YOU, making false accusations.
Be gone, troll.
Angemon says
Semeru posted:
“Ah she has a nasty habit of deliberately posting stories that are not true”
And, in typical semeresque fashion, semeru has no evidence to back his assertion. Nothing out of the ordinary to him – he tosses lies, smears and false accusations around like a monkey with his feces.
Semeru says
A few years ago Geller posted an article called Islamic Jihad in Indonesia, and she used !0 photos to sensationalize the arcticle
Weller wrote
The price for being a Christian…. in Indonesia…and soon to be Malaysia (allegedly reported in the local daily news yesterday and today.)
Death for abandoning (lapsing) Muslims and for Christians who preach in Malay.
Indonesia. An Islamic democracy. Is Islam compatible with democracy? These pictures were forwarded to me from a friend who knows a Christian in Indonesia……I cannot reveal too much or I will jeopardize the lives of those that smuggled these pics out. I am running them beneath the fold as they are too graphic to run on the main page. I am running them so the world will know and see that Indonesians are NOT the friend of anyone who is not Muslim.
Geller makes a point that whoever sent the image would be in great danger, poppycock, as the pictures had been circulating the net for several years. The was even a poster here called Shiva who linked to his blog showing the images.
Many of the images have beeb around since the Sampit Conflict in 2001 where Dayaks ran amok and slaughter Madurese (moslem)
Angemon says
Semeru posted:
“A few years ago Geller posted an article called Islamic Jihad in Indonesia, and she used !0 photos to sensationalize the arcticle”
0 photos?
“Geller makes a point that whoever sent the image would be in great danger, poppycock, as the pictures had been circulating the net for several years.”
Here we have typical semeru-esque obfuscation: sugesting that whoever sent the pictures wouldn’t be in danger because the pictures have been around for years. The amount of time that the pictures have been around tells us nothing about the safety of their author(s). And, of course, given how he proved to be seriously chronologically challenged, when he says “the pictures have been circulating around the net for years” he doesn’t mean that the pictures were circulating for years before Pamela used them: he literally means that the pictures have been circulating around the net for years after Pamela used them.
And, of course, semeru’s rant about the pictures tells us nothing about the validity of what Pamela wrote about jihad in indonesia. This is semeru’s MO, which I’ve witnessed first-hand on JW: coming in, making a mountain out of a speck of sand and using said mountain to doubt the accuracy of JW articles.
Semeru says
Ho ho Using picture that have nothing to to with christians being murdered, is in Agrononsenses eyes making a mountain out of a speck of sand.
The images Geller used are highly graphic, and can generate a lot of bad feeling and hate towards the perpetrators. The photos found at this link are mostly of Madurese (moslems) who where decapitated by Dayaks.
Now Agrononense tries and twist the facts the pictures have been circulating around the net for years” he doesn’t mean that the pictures were circulating for years before Pamela used them: he literally means that the pictures have been circulating around the net for years after Pamela used them.
So let us take a look
http://pamelageller.com/2006/11/islamic_jihad_i-2.html/
The photos #9 #10 have been around on the net since 1999, several years before Geller started blogging,
http://www.fica.org/hr/Sanggauledo.html
There was even a decapitatoin image on the cover of Time Magazine.
Pictures #4, #6 #7 #8 #9 and ten are from the Dayak/ Madurese confict in Borneo. And the decapittated heads are of moslem victims.
I speculate that Agrononse will question how I know that the perpetrators are not moslem and are dayaks,that is quite easy, in photo #9 #10 the perps are wearing red head band, a sign of loyalty to the Dayak cause. A small detail grossly overlooked by Geller.
Photo #3 is from the Banuwangi (Shaman) riots in 1999, A witchhunt in Banyuwangi against alleged sorcerers spiraled into widepsread riots and violence. In addition to alleged sorcerers, Islamic clerics were also targeted and killed, Nahdlatul Ulama members were murdered by rioters. Again long before Geller started blogging
http://www.fica.org/hr/Banyuwangi.html
In the link there is another photo of the motorcyclists dragging the headless corspe, the other photo depicts moslems displaying the head of a suspected “black ninja”
The other decapitation photos are from Sampit Massacre 2001 Just check the URL of photos #6 #7 #8, see that the photos are labeled Sampit 1,01 2,01 3,1
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“Ho ho Using picture that have nothing to to with christians being murdered, is in Agrononsenses eyes making a mountain out of a speck of sand.”
You have yet to provide any credible evidence to prove that Pamela knew the photos weren’t of christians being murdered.
“The images Geller used are highly graphic, and can generate a lot of bad feeling and hate towards the perpetrators.”
And you have yet to prove that was Pamela’s goal.
“Now Agrononense tries and twist the facts the pictures have been circulating around the net for years” he doesn’t mean that the pictures were circulating for years before Pamela used them: he literally means that the pictures have been circulating around the net for years after Pamela used them.”
Nope. I pointed out that since you’re chronologically challenged you said that “the pictures had been circulating the net for several years”.
The rest of your post is clutter caused by my appeal to your google skills, and it does nothing to prove that Pamela knew that the photos weren’t of christians. Really, I stressed that point on a previous post, so Im just going to copy/paste from there:
“And, of course, even if you can prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that the photos Pamela used in a what?10-year-old article? have been in fact circling around the web for longer than that, you can’t prove that Pamela knew that, or that the photos disprove what she wrote in the article.“
Semeru says
Agrononse
Quite a few photos have been around since 1999 long before teller started blogging
http://www.fica.org/hr/Sanggauledo.html
http://www.fica.org/hr/Banyuwangi.html
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“Agrononse
Quite a few photos have been around since 1999 long before teller started blogging
http://www.fica.org/hr/Sanggauledo.html
http://www.fica.org/hr/Banyuwangi.html”
“Quite a few”, eh? That tells us nothing about the photos that Pamela posted on the article you mention. It’s weird because you have, in the past, used your google skills to precisely poinpoint the origin of a specific photo:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/11/angola-reportedly-bans-islam-destroys-mosques/comment-page-0#comment-986732
Why are you stuttering now?
And, of course, even if you can prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that the photos Pamela used in a what?10-year-old article? have been in fact circling around the web for longer than that, you can’t prove that Pamela knew that, or that the photos disprove what she wrote in the article. Not that facts will stop you from trying to whitewash islam and defaming crictics of islam – not long ago you acted like you knew better than Obama what school he went to and what he studied there.
Semeru says
OOps Not Teller but Geller
Champ says
o0ps Not Semeru but Senseless
Semeru says
In the following links
http://www.fica.org/hr/Sanggauledo.html
http://www.fica.org/hr/Banyuwangi.html”
At the bottom of the page you will notice
This Human Rights section ( http://www.fica.org/hr ) is still under active construction.
Information is still being added everyday. Please come back again to see more updated content.
Prepared by Fica-Net, http://www.fica.org, Last updated: 04/09/99
So here is one site that was published several of the photos dated 04/09/99
Agrononse postedAnd, of course, even if you can prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that the photos Pamela used in a what?10-year-old article? have been in fact circling around the web for longer than that, you can’t prove that Pamela knew that, or that the photos disprove what she wrote in the article.
This is interesting point what Geller wrote had nothing to do with the images, in fact show wrote sweet FA, She gave no explaination about the photos. But she put the into an article dealing with decapitaion.
Also If Geller did not know that the photos where of moslems that where beheaded by Dayaks, then it was very dishonest of teller to publish the photos without any explaination, leaving the public to come to the conclusion that moslems where the perpetuators.
At least six of the Photos, moslems are the victims. Ho Ho you can not prove other wise, so you resort to name calling.
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“This is interesting point what Geller wrote had nothing to do with the images, in fact show wrote sweet FA, She gave no explaination about the photos.”
And now you’re lying again. This is the reason why you didn’t give us the link to Pamela’s post, so you can lie and lie. Here’s the article:
http://pamelageller.com/2006/11/islamic_jihad_i-2.html/
Here’s what’s written there:
“These pictures were forwarded to me from a friend who knows a Christian in Indonesia……I cannot reveal too much or I will jeopardize the lives of those that smuggled these pics out.”
Now, can you prove that the above sentences are false?
“Also If Geller did not know that the photos where of moslems that where beheaded by Dayaks, then it was very dishonest of teller to publish the photos without any explaination”
See? More lies that require the recipient not to know what’s in the article.
“Ho Ho you can not prove other wise, so you resort to name calling”
Actually, burden of evidence is upon you – you have yet to prove that Pamela knew the origin of the photos and lied about it. And when it comes to this alleged name calling, anyone cans see you threw the first stone, so good luck playing the victim.
Also, what’s with the all the “Ho Ho”? You’re a mohammedan so that excludes anything related to Santa Claus. Are you you trying to sound like an owl or an anime villainess?
Mirren10 says
The dailyeuropa has just posted an update on the perpetrator:
”Reynolds appears to be either Asian or black – which explains why a description of him was not given earlier.
He may be a Muslim convert but the state are referring to him by his birth name, not a Muslim name, if he has one.
Another clue is that Zac was believed to be trying to protect a group of young girls from this individual when he and two friends were attacked.”
The photograph shows the back of Reynold’s head, and he appears to be black.
This doesn’t mean, of course, that he *is* a muslim convert, he could be a Jamaican yardie , who have perpetrated equally violent attacks. Or he could just be a nutter.
Ah, the wondrous benefits of PC/MC immigration …
Semeru says
Well well well Mirren10 Quoting from an anti-jewish anti-Isreal, pro Zundel rag I see
https://dailyeuropa.wordpress.com/2014/12/19/auschwitz-why-the-gas-chambers-are-a-hoax/
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“Well well well Mirren10 Quoting from an anti-jewish anti-Isreal, pro Zundel rag I see”
According to whom, and what does that tell us about the identity of the perpetrator featured in Mirren’s post? Nothing, of course. Had they identified the criminal as an Israeli or a Jew, you might have had a point there.
Semeru says
AgrononoseAccording to whom, and what does that tell us about the identity of the perpetrator featured in Mirren’s post? Nothing, of course. Had they identified the criminal as an Israeli or a Jew, you might have had a point there.
#1 According to what is written in Daily Europe
#2 as Mirren 10 comment comes from a Anti Jewish and Racist rag, then the description has a racist slant
#3 Agrononse you, despite all your fine words are not much more than a pathetic prick, the europe dail doesn’t not have to identitify the criminal as being Israeli or a Jew.
But it does go as far as to
Daily Europe Jan 03
I’m sure others have noticed but it’s very clear from this image that the attackers were white. Even though they are wearing ski masks, you can still see around the eyes and wrist they are both “white” – possibly light skinned Syrian or Israeli.
Witnesses also say they spoke with perfect French accents.
Aside from looking too professional for your average Jihadis this could well be a “False Flag” attack masquerading as an Islamic terrorist attack. For various reasons.
Charlie Hebdo didn’t only take the piss out of Muslims, these cartoons criticised Jews too
Here are more rants from the disgusting rag, I do not give likes here as R Spencer does not approve linkink to White Power sites
Jan 28
I suppose it depends on ones own definition of ‘attack’. The truth is the majority of these ‘attacks’ are nothing more than criticisms of Israel and/or Jewish people on social media, Twitter and Facebook – which is hardly the same as actual attacks, involving violence or damage to property.
AND
Jewish people do tend to play the victim card a lot when in truth they are the most protected community in the UK, and throughout Europe, and the least likely to be the victims of any crime.
Jan 27
Theres No Business Like Shoah Business
Here is a collection of video documentaries, interviews and material relating to internment camps in Germany and Poland during WWII.
I believe this material provides proof that atrocities and the figures for the number of dead at these camps, commonly touted as 6,000,000, are grossly inflated by unscrupulous individuals.
This was done for financial gain but also to garner sympathy and immunise themselves against criticism.
As we saw in France recently when Paris was attacked by persons claiming to represent ISIS and Al Qaeda, Jews changed the focus of these attacks to seem like their main aim was to target Jews.
Jan 18
Incredibly Jews have turned the Paris attacks into a propaganda drive against criticising Jews, meaning more silencing of the public on issues relating to Jewish foul play, more security (and funding) for Jews, more freedom for Jews to accuse anybody of “anti-semitism”, more sympathy for Jews in their conflict with Palestine.
The extent to which Jews benefit from terrorism would lead any right thinking person to suspect their direct involvement in terrorism itself.
Dec 19
It’s holocaust remembrance day, so remember folks, it’s a hoax. For information on the REAL (and forgotten) holocaust see:
Dec 17
I don’t agree with Paul Weston’s support of Israel, as both Islam and Judaism are two sides of the same coin in my opinion
Nov i9
Unemployment is a Jewish invention
It’s always the white working classes who suffer as of a result of unemployment but the truth is that unemployment itself is a complete lie and everybody would have a job in a fair and Nationalist society.
Nov 22
This video explores the Jewish hand behind the undermining and demoralization of American culture and the European heritage of the people.
Narrated by David Duke
Edited by Ares
So are you going to be a good nazi creep and defend Daily Europe
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“#1 According to what is written in Daily Europe”
Where does it say that they’re anti-Jewish? Not that it matters, like I said, since they’re not naming the attacker as a Jew.
“#2 as Mirren 10 comment comes from a Anti Jewish and Racist rag, then the description has a racist slant”
Nope. Nothing racist in saying that the attacker might have been a muslim. By your “logic” (and I’m using the word logic on a very, very, very loose sense here) then if dailyeuropa said that the Boston bombers or the Fort Hood shooter were muslims – which they were – then it would be racist – which it isn’t.
What races are islam and muslims?
“#3 Agrononse you, despite all your fine words are not much more than a pathetic prick”
What did you wrote? Oh, yeah:
“Ho Ho you can not prove other wise, so you resort to name calling”
“the europe dail doesn’t not have to identitify the criminal as being Israeli or a Jew.”
There’s not much point in shouting “anti-semitism” if no one is talking about jews. As it stands, it seems you’re just flaying your arms wildly and hoping to draw attention away from the fact that the attacker might very well have been a muslim.
“But it does go as far as to
Daily Europe Jan 03”
And the rest isn’t connected to the article Mirren mentioned, so let’s skip the fluff, ok?
“So are you going to be a good nazi creep and defend Daily Europe”
Ah, yes, more insults. Since the dunce can’t use facts to counter-argue what Mirren posted (well, he can’t use facts in general), his only choice is to throw insults around, and he expects to silence me by calling me a “nazi”, which is sheer nonsense – anyone can peruse the site and see I’m a staunch defender of Israel and Jews. Did I defend dailyeeuropa? No, I asked the dunce why he called it anti-semites and what was the relevance of the alleged anti-semitism to what Mirren reported since it didn’t involve jews. But, in typical nazi brownshirt fashion, the dunce thinks that hurling words with such a negative connotation as “nazi” he can silence his critics. You see, he is a mohammedan,, and he has a history of defending mohammedans and islam. This is why he has this kind of knee-jerk reactions to anything that portrays islam in a bad light.
Got any other strawman, dunce? Or are you willing to admit you got nothing on Mirren?
Semeru says
The Daily Europe is loaded with anti jewish and holocaust denial articles, that belong in sites like Stormfront, So why are Geller and Mirren10 quoting from such dubious source
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“The Daily Europe is loaded with anti jewish and holocaust denial articles, that belong in sites like Stormfront, So why are Geller and Mirren10 quoting from such dubious source”
“herp derp, I say that site is anti-jewish therefore you can’t trust it when it says that the author of an attack could very well have been a muslim, because that contradicts what I was saying. How dare Pamela and Mirren accuse muslims of decapitating someone? That’s unheard of!”
Semeru says
I have tried to post the following comment several times, but it is not being accepted, I suspect it is because it contains to many links
So I send it in two parts
Part 2
In the next link is the complete collection as they appeared in Shiva blog
http://dhuwix.tripod.com/gallery/tragedi/sampit/index_sampit.htm
Geller was only playing drama queen, as there was no need to smuggle these images out of Indonesia as they where already in circulation
Another salient point, Shiva was located in Indonesia.
unfortunatly he blog was blocked by google,
I would like to point out that Geller is not the only bullshitter in the CJM. If you do a ggogle image search of image #7 http://dhuwix.tripod.com/gallery/tragedi/sampit/sampit-41.jpg you will get 274 hits, mostly claiming she was decapitated in south Thailand, or by Uighurs in China.
If you open image #11 you will see the young girl is in the very center, now do a google image search, then the results are correct, most of the hits mention Sampit.
On Gellers page there are over 174 comments, and at 1/3 least point that the images are wrong, yet she still lets them stand.
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“Geller was only playing drama queen, as there was no need to smuggle these images out of Indonesia as they where already in circulation”
Boy, you’re really thick in the head, aren’t you? I already told you: unless you can prove that Pamela knew of the existence of those images before she wrote her post in 2006 you have nothing to stand on.
Also, is your whole idea that we can’t trust Pamela based on one single post of the thousands, if not tens of thousands, she wrote since she started her blog?
Semeru says
It seems that by splitting the post into two parts things work
Here is Part I
Agrononsense quotes Geller. “These pictures were forwarded to me from a friend who knows a Christian in Indonesia……I cannot reveal too much or I will jeopardize the lives of those that smuggled these pics out.”
What a load of porkies.
There was no need to smuggle the images out of Malaysia or Indonesia, as they where already in circulation.
Pictures #9 #10 are from the Sanggau Ledo incident which happened in 1997. I would like to point out that Sanggau is in Inland Kalimantan where the majority are Christian
These images have been available to view since 1999 at FICA Org
One more very salient point is that when then mouse is positioned over the Images, a caption appears, tin these Image the captions are Sanggauledo 1_1 and 2-1. So teller can not claim ignorance, in her hurry to to blame moslems for the crimes she did not do a simple google for the truth
http://www.fica.org/hr/Sanggauledo.html
Images #6 #7 #8
These Images are from the Sampit massacre 2001, The images where until recently on site which mirrored a page fro Singapore’s Straits Times. If you care to look in the JW archive from Febuary 2006 you will find a commentator named Shiva who linked to a gallery containing the images #6 #7 #8 on his blog called Illustrated PIG to Islam, it also contained 8 other related images.
These image appeared 9 months later on Geller blog, also the same with these images, a caption appears, this time Sampit 01_1, 02_1, 03_1
So all Geller had to do was google Sampit beheading, and she would have gotten the truth.
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“What a load of porkies.
There was no need to smuggle the images out of Malaysia or Indonesia, as they where already in circulation.
(…)
So all Geller had to do was google Sampit beheading, and she would have gotten the truth.”
Boy, you’re really thick in the head, aren’t you? I already told you: unless you can prove that Pamela knew of the existence of those images before she wrote her post in 2006 you have nothing to stand on.
Also, is your whole idea that we can’t trust Pamela based on one single post of the thousands, if not tens of thousands, she wrote since she started her blog?
Semeru says
So Agrononse, you and several others such as Jerkoffski accuse me of being a mohammedan and white wash islam
So let us take a look, where in the following item do I white wash
http://pamelageller.com/2006/11/islamic_jihad_i-2.html/
Geller opens the article that she has received some very graphic photos, she says she will update with more imformatoin later.
She then proceeds to write about the Catholic school girls that where beheaded, and then a link to ” Indonesian Catholics were put to death by firing squad, followed by, Habib Rizieq of the Islam Defenders’ Front says it is religiously permissible
to murder George Bush.
If you notice I did not try and white wash any of these three items as they are indeed true
Also I you notice Geller did not give an update as promised
So before Geller displays the images, she shows three legitimate articles, so leading people to assume that the images are also Moslem on Christian violence. She manages to dupe most people, but not all, as can be seen by the comments. What is almost impossible to prove is that she delered many comments that contained links, including several comments of mine.
I have not criticized the items that are true, such as the three girls in Poso or the Bushes blood is halal
I have criticized the use of the photos which have absolutely nothing to do with moslem on Christian violence, in fact two of the photos could very well be the opposite, Christian on moslem violence, because the majority of Dayaks in inner Borneo are catholic. All the decapitated heads are from moslem.
Even Time magazine gets it right
http://content.time.com/time/covers/asia/0,16641,20010312,00.html
There is mountains of evidence to prove that the images are not of christians, but are of moslems.
There has not been a single report of a whole christian village being wiped out and beheaded in Indonesia, if there are reports of three catholic girls being beheaded, then it will definitely be reported by one of the many christian newspapers or human rights organization.
There is no way that I am white washing islam when pointing out the facts of the photos
If you will notice, I only criticize articles that are dubious or false, and can link to a reliable source.
Not every thing Spencer/Geller say are true
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“So Agrononse, you and several others such as Jerkoffski accuse me of being a mohammedan and white wash islam”
We just call it as we see it.
“ She manages to dupe most people”
Once again, dumbass: where’s the evidence to show that Pamela willingly tried to dupe anyone?
“but not all, as can be seen by the comments. What is almost impossible to prove is that she delered many comments that contained links, including several comments of mine.”
So according to you, she deleted comments that “proved” her wrong, but not all of them? Is that what you’re trying to swindle us into believing?
“If you will notice, I only criticize articles that are dubious or false, and can link to a reliable source.”
Liar. From the top of my head, I remember when you tried to get us to believe that the muslim population of Malmö was around the 15% mark. You didn’t gave us any source for your numbers and you tried to swindle us by pretending only immingrants in Malmö were muslims, like I dissected here:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/08/sweden-rabbi-attacked-in-malmo-after-synagogue-vandalized/comment-page-1#comment-1098401
You even lied about the numbers in Wikipedia, like I dissected here:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/08/sweden-rabbi-attacked-in-malmo-after-synagogue-vandalized/comment-page-1#comment-1099482
Semeru says
Agrononse saysBoy, you’re really thick in the head, aren’t you? I already told you: unless you can prove that Pamela knew of the existence of those images before she wrote her post in 2006 you have nothing to stand on.
It is not so much about the existence, but about the the content, she is using the photos to support her claim moslem on christian violence, despite all the evidence that that the images have nothing to do with persecution of christians, she still lets the falsehood remain.
Agrononse says Also, is your whole idea that we can’t trust Pamela based on one single post of the thousands, if not tens of thousands, she wrote since she started her blog?
No doubt that to look more carefully at Gellers blog, quite a lot of lies and untruths would be uncovered.
Remember that lies and untruths are the same as hate speech, no doubt the home office has more time than me, and found enough lies and untruths (hate speech) to warrant banning her from the UK
Why I pick on the Borneo photos, is because she tried to do a Paliwood, but she failed, she could at least used photos that did not have have captions
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“It is not so much about the existence”
Not about the existence? So it doesn’t matter of the photos exist or not? Let me repet myself, dumbass, since apparently you were too dumb to figure things out the first two times I told you:
Where’s your evidence that Pamela knew that the photos were circling the net for years and willingly lied about it?
“she is using the photos to support her claim moslem on christian violence”
“Her claim”? Boy, don’t go there. There’s evidence of muslim violence against christians going back to the invention of islam.
“No doubt that to look more carefully at Gellers blog, quite a lot of lies and untruths would be uncovered.”
Why don’t you start a blog dedicated to “uncover” those alleged “lies and untruths”?
“Remember that lies and untruths are the same as hate speech”
Oh really? Then what you did now is hate speech. And the quran is hate speech since it claims Christians worship Mary as part of the Trinity, and that Jews consider Ezra to be the son of God, and it uses those allegations to justify violence against Jews and Christians.
“no doubt the home office has more time than me, and found enough lies and untruths (hate speech) to warrant banning her from the UK”
Nope. Robert and Pamela were banned from the UK because they speak the truth about islam and the UK government was afraid of violence from muslims. And Robert’s pro-Israel stance didn’t help either. And since you lied about it, you, according to your own logic, are guilty of hate speech.
“Why I pick on the Borneo photos, is because she tried to do a Paliwood, but she failed, she could at least used photos that did not have have captions”
Once again, dumbass, where’s your evidence that Pamela deliberately used photos to try to fool anyone?
Semeru says
The images are still up today, thus making her as much a liar to-day as it did when she first posted them
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“The images are still up today, thus making her as much a liar to-day as it did when she first posted them”
Once again, dumbass: where’s your evidence to show that she knew the origin of the images? If you don’t have then you’re lying and, by your logic, that’s hate speech.
Semeru says
So much for her credibility for posting such tragic images if she didn’t not know the source of the photos,
So much for her credentials as a journalist for not controlling the photos, especially due to their graphic nature, before publishing them
She did exactly the same thing when she in another article showed a gruesome photo as evidence of Muslim violence against Christians in Nigeria, when in reality it was victims of a tanker explosion in the Congo, she even boasted she was the first to report it (anther lie as it was first reported in a christian blog)
She did remove The Muslim violence against Christians in Nigeria, when the lie was exposed, she still has the Borneo images on her site, even though she has been informed that of the nature of the images.
Pam geller is a evil liar. It is disgusting making the people killed in the borneo conflict a part of her lie.
Its a toss up whos the bigger piece of crap, you or Geller
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“So much for her credibility for posting such tragic images if she didn’t not know the source of the photos,”
But she did knew. She stated that the photos were sent by a Christian in Indonesia.
“So much for her credentials as a journalist for not controlling the photos, especially due to their graphic nature, before publishing them”
So she’s a bad journalist because she didn’t censor anything and gave the unfiltered news? Lol, what a joke you are, dunce.
“She did exactly the same thing when she in another article showed a gruesome photo as evidence of Muslim violence against Christians in Nigeria, when in reality it was victims of a tanker explosion in the Congo, she even boasted she was the first to report it (anther lie as it was first reported in a christian blog)”
So where’s your evidence that she knew that other blog had reported those news?
“Pam geller is a evil liar. It is disgusting making the people killed in the borneo conflict a part of her lie.”
Once again, you have yet to provide any evidence to back your assertions that Pamela lied.
“Its a toss up whos the bigger piece of crap, you or Geller”
The answer to that is “You are”, since you’re the one who is constantly defending a violent, misogynistic ideology that mandates warfare against and subjugation of non-believers, treats non-believers as third-class semi-slaves and allows for sex with children, and you keep attacking, denigrating and insulting those who are against such a vile, disgusting, putrid ideology. Now go drink camel piss, something that you once tried to argue in favour of.
Semeru says
The photos are still on her blog, there she is lying
Angemon says
The dunce posted
“The photos are still on her blog, there she is lying”
Once again: where’s your evidence that she knew the origin of the photos and lied about it?
Seriously, that was one of the first things I asked you. I can’t make it any simpler than this. I told you what you had to do to prove your point and yet you keep flayling around, calling Pamela “evil” and “liar” without actually doing what would prove your point.
All you do is whitewash islam and attack the people who take a stance against such a despicable ideology. And the funniest part is that you try to make it seem as you’re legit – you claimed that you only attack “falsehoods” when you have “reliable sources” when anyone who knows your behaviour can attest otherwise.
You have your head so far up your all that not only you can see the light in the other side but all you can smell is crap. Your crap, and you claim that the smell comes from everyone else.
So dunce, where’s your evidence that the attacker mentioned in Pamela’s post was not a muslim? You know, the point you were trying to make before you tried to sidetrack us?
Semeru says
Agornonse Once again: where’s your evidence that she knew the origin of the photos and lied about it?
It is very clear she did not have a clue as to the origin of the the images or that they where photos of decapitated heads of moslem men, women and children. She still went ahead and published them alluding that they where moslem on christian violence.
That is the same as lying
If Geller was honest she would have done a check up on the images, especially due to their graphic nature.
Another point should be made, If you have bothered to look in the comments you should have noticed that Geller gives iinksto about ten Moslem on christian violence images from FICA, the same site that has several of the offending images are. Which is a good indicator, that she had opened a link to the offending images and the explored the site.The descriptions of the images give no indication to the religions in the imges, they only say Dayak and Madurese.
Over one third of the commentators point out that the images are from the Dayak(Animists/christian)/Madurese(moslem) sothis fact alone warrants a fact check by Gellar.
The fact remaims, the images are still on her site, despite over 1/3 of the commetators pointed to her error
As long as the image remain up with out an explaination, she is perpetuating a very serious lie
So labeling images as moslem on Christian violence without knowing the source beforehand as Geller has done make her a liar, and is further proof that she a “muslim hater”
AgononseSo dunce, where’s your evidence that the attacker mentioned in Pamela’s post was not a muslim? You know, the point you were trying to make before you tried to sidetrack us?
I have no evidence he was not a moslem, the same as Geller and Mirren 10 have no evidence that he was.Their only source is a rather disgusting white power blog Interesting to see Gellers/Mirrens source,
So dunce, where’s your evidence that the attacker mentioned in Pamela’s post was not a muslim? You know, the point you were trying to make before you tried to sidetrack us?
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“It is very clear she did not have a clue as to the origin of the the images or that they where photos of decapitated heads of moslem men, women and children. She still went ahead and published them alluding that they where moslem on christian violence.”
We’ve been through this before. Pamela believe that they were taken by a christian in Indonesia. Either bring forth evidence to prove otherwise or shove it.
“That is the same as lying”
Nope. Go see the definition of “lie”, you’ll see that “intentionality” is a core requirement.
“If Geller was honest she would have done a check up on the images, especially due to their graphic nature.”
Once again: if she believed that the images came from a christian in Indonesia why would she need to check them?
“The fact remaims, the images are still on her site, despite over 1/3 of the commetators pointed to her error”
And so are the comments pointing her error. Your point being?
“As long as the image remain up with out an explaination, she is perpetuating a very serious lie”
You mean, the explanation that, according to you, is in over 1/3 of the comments?
“So labeling images as moslem on Christian violence without knowing the source beforehand as Geller has done make her a liar”
Once again: definition of lie. Intentionality. You need to prove that Pamela knew what those images refereed to BEFORE she made her post. That was exactly what I told you early on, and you’re still flopping around without understanding the core concept.
“I have no evidence he was not a moslem, the same as Geller and Mirren 10 have no evidence that he was”
And yet, you tried to argue that Mirren was wrong.
Semeru says
OOPS hit the POET COMMENT a bit prematurely
So here we go
Their only source is a rather disgusting white power blog Interesting to see Gellers/Mirrens source,
https://dailyeuropa.wordpress.com/2015/01/29/the-truth-behind-the-liberation-of-auschwitz/
Well, I notice that Spencer took down the article shortly after I posted a link to the perps name, so Spencer does not seem to think the he was a muslim
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“Their only source is a rather disgusting white power blog Interesting to see Gellers/Mirrens source,
https://dailyeuropa.wordpress.com/2015/01/29/the-truth-behind-the-liberation-of-auschwitz/”
Huh, that link tells us nothing about the criminal. Like I said, flopping around.
Semeu says
Ho Ho
I did not claim that the link had anything to do with the murderer, it is to show what type of blog it came from. Not very reliable
It is very surprising that Gellar would quote from such a source
I notice you do not criticize Spencer, for disapearing the article, or question Spencer as to how he knew the perp was first a moslem then later not
Angemon says
The dunce semeu (an alternate account of semeru/semereu)posted:
“Ho Ho”
Again, what’s with the “Ho Ho”? Are you an owl or something?
“I did not claim that the link had anything to do with the murderer, it is to show what type of blog it came from. Not very reliable”
Huh, so your angle is that the article saying that the murderer was not a muslim because of an opinion piece about the holocaust. Good luck with that.
“It is very surprising that Gellar would quote from such a source”
Once again: do you have any evidence that the murderer was not a muslim?
“I notice you do not criticize Spencer, for disapearing the article, or question Spencer as to how he knew the perp was first a moslem then later not”
What “disapearing the article” are you talking about?
Champ says
BACKWARDS ALERT!!! …it didn’t take “Senseless” long to start his bullshit!
Champ says
“Senseless” is a lost cause serving an evil cause: islam.
Infidel Task Force says
Welcome Back Pamela!! We know what its like to be shut down. But we persevere.
mortimer says
Pamela,
You are the hero of everyone who loves freedom.
Mac-101 says
For the multitude of those who do not like my posts on this site; I tried to post a couple times on Atlas Shrugs, STILL BLOCKED! LOL!
Paul says
Clicking on the link l still get ‘pageok’ and blank page. Anyone got suggestions?
Jay Boo says
@Paul
Personally, I would not click on any blank links without description
especially by Relic
Relic never leaves a comment only a link
Peggy says
I am still using XP and can’t get the new site.
Anyone else just gets pageok and nothing else?
Darrius says
y’know, in a roundabout way,this is just another win for the forces of truth, humanity and civilization. – oh, Pam…when are you coming “down under” again?:
Jae M says
Excellent news! Glad Pamela is back online.
Michael Warden says
I was hoping that, your site being down, you might come over to the UK (wear a burka, no-one will know it’s you !! ) and sort out Theresa May’s mess for us ?
Gary says
You are a great fighter. Happy to have you back.
AnneM says
WELCOME BACK Pamela!
Peter D Relyea says
Keep up the good work Pamela! You’re the Unsinkable Molly Brown! Amour, Pete
Semeru says
Here is further evidence that the photos where around before Geller put the up, also this link debunks Geller claim that they needed to be smuggled to of Indonesia
This is an Indonesia blog and the images where posted 05-11-2005, 11:53 AM nearly 1 1/2 years before Geller put them up
http://www.forumbebas.com/thread-878.html
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“Here is further evidence that the photos where around before Geller put the up, also this link debunks Geller claim that they needed to be smuggled to of Indonesia”
We’ve already been through this before. A lie requires intentionality. So once gain, dumbass: where’s your evidence that Pamela knew the origin of the photos and willingly lied about it? Where’s your evidence that she didn’t get them from someone posing as a christian in Indonesia?
Semeru says
She may not of known the origin of the pjotos, but if the images where sent to her why do the captions show up when the mouse is drawn over the images,
The captions indicate that at least six of the photos come from the Dayaks/Madurese conflict.
If you read the comments, you will see that she has opened the site that contain some of the images.
So she may have been unaware of the origin of the images at the time of posting, But she is aware of the origin now. The photos remain, even though she has been presented with evidence that they have nothing to do with moslem on christian violence.
She lied at the time because she did not know the origin of the photos, but intentionally posted them as moslem on christian violence, it has been proven to her that the photos are of moslems murdered by animist/christian dayaks, so even today she is still perpetrating a heinous lie
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“She lied at the time because she did not know the origin of the photos, but intentionally posted them as moslem on christian violence”
The contradiction isn’t apparent to the dunce. Oh well, he’ll get there, eventually.
Once again, dunce, where’s your evidence that Pamela knew the origin of the photos and intentionally lied about it? Where’s your evidence that she didn’t got them by email from someone posing as an Indonesian Christian?
Semeru says
Here is further evidence that the photos where around before Geller put the up, also this link debunks Geller claim that they needed to be smuggled to of Indonesia
This is an Indonesia blog and the images where posted 05-11-2005, 11:53 AM nearly 1 1/2 years before Geller put them up
http://www.forumbebas.com/thread-878.html
N
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“Here is further evidence that the photos where around before Geller put the up, also this link debunks Geller claim that they needed to be smuggled to of Indonesia”
We’ve already been through this before. A lie requires intentionality. So once gain, dumbass: where’s your evidence that Pamela knew the origin of the photos and willingly lied about it? Where’s your evidence that she didn’t get them from someone posing as a christian in Indonesia?
Semeru says
And here they are again, this time from Thailand, which has a rigid censorship of graphic images.
The date on these images are in Thai, Thai year showing on the post is counted from the death of the Buddha in 545 BC. The article was posted 6 ต.ค. 47 (6 oct 2004)
http://topicstock.pantip.com/chalermthai/topicstock/A3050773/A3050773.html
More
http://www.artsmen.net/content/show.php?Category=mythboard&No=1333
Again in Thai. The date is 3 ต.ค. 2547 (3 Oct 2004)
Angemon says
We’ve already been through this before. A lie requires intentionality. So once gain, dumbass: where’s your evidence that Pamela knew the origin of the photos and willingly lied about it? Where’s your evidence that she didn’t get them from someone posing as a christian in Indonesia?
Semeru says
Looks like it is a problem to post too many linkx
And here they are again, this time from Thailand, which has a rigid censorship of graphic images.
The date on these images are in Thai, Thai year showing on the post is counted from the death of the Buddha in 545 BC. The article was posted 6 ต.ค. 47 (6 oct 2004)
http://topicstock.pantip.com/chalermthai/topicstock/A3050773/A3050773.html
Angemon says
We’ve already been through this before. A lie requires intentionality. So once gain, dumbass: where’s your evidence that Pamela knew the origin of the photos and willingly lied about it? Where’s your evidence that she didn’t get them from someone posing as a christian in Indonesia?
Semeru says
Her is More
http://www.artsmen.net/content/show.php?Category=mythboard&No=1333
Again in Thai. The date is 3 ต.ค. 2547 (3 Oct 2004)
Angemon says
We’ve already been through this before. A lie requires intentionality. So once gain, dumbass: where’s your evidence that Pamela knew the origin of the photos and willingly lied about it? Where’s your evidence that she didn’t get them from someone posing as a christian in Indonesia?
Semeru says
Testing
She may not of known the origin of the pjotos, but if the images where sent to her why do the captions show up when the mouse is drawn over the images,
The captions indicate that at least six of the photos come from the Dayaks/Madurese conflict.
If you read the comments, you will see that she has opened the site that contain some of the images.
So she may have been unaware of the origin of the images at the time of posting, But she is aware of the origin now. The photos remain, even though she has been presented with evidence that they have nothing to do with moslem on christian violence.
She lied at the time because she did not know the origin of the photos, but intentionally posted them as moslem on christian violence, it has been proven to her that the photos are of moslems murdered by animist/christian dayaks, so even today she is still perpetrating a heinous lie
Angemon says
The dunce posted:
“She lied at the time because she did not know the origin of the photos, but intentionally posted them as moslem on christian violence”
The contradiction isn’t apparent to the dunce. Oh well, he’ll get there, eventually.
Once again, dunce, where’s your evidence that Pamela knew the origin of the photos and intentionally lied about it? Where’s your evidence that she didn’t got them by email from someone posing as an Indonesian Christian?