• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

The organized Islamic campaign to silence criticism of Islam

Jan 17, 2015 11:39 am By Robert Spencer

behead-insult-islam-mohammedThis article summarizes the Islamic jihad against the freedom of speech that I have spoken and written about for years — you can get a great deal of information about the OIC’s war against free speech in my 2008 book Stealth Jihad and my 2013 book Arab Winter Comes to America.

It is remarkable that the Washington Post, which usually aids and abets this campaign to smear and defame foes of jihad terror, would publish this. They did so because the author is a Muslim with (from the looks of this article) an apparent breezy confidence in an imminent massive reformation of Islam. Thus the Post editors can publish this piece without fear of appearing “Islamophobic” themselves.

Unfortunately, that reform not on the horizon, and there is no mention in this piece of an even bigger elephant in the room: the fact that those who try to silence (either with violence or by destroying their reputations) those who speak negatively about jihad terror can point to passages of the Qur’an and Sunnah to support their actions. Muhammad had people who criticized him murdered in cold blood; why shouldn’t Hamas-linked CAIR and the “Islamophobia” mongers try to ruin the careers and lives of critics of jihad? That’s comparably moderate.

Aside from those issues, however, Asra Q. Nomani is to be applauded for daring to speak out against this fascist enterprise. How many other Muslims are doing so? If the mainstream narrative were true, there would be thousands. But instead, there is just one.

“Meet the honor brigade, an organized campaign to silence debate on Islam,” by Asra Q. Nomani, Washington Post, January 16, 2015:

“You have shamed the community,” a fellow Muslim in Morgantown, W.Va., said to me as we sat in a Panera Bread in 2004. “Stop writing.”

Then 38, I had just written an essay for The Washington Post’s Outlook section arguing that women should be allowed to pray in the main halls of mosques, rather than in segregated spaces, as most mosques in America are arranged. An American Muslim born in India, I grew up in a tolerant but conservative family. In my hometown mosque, I had disobeyed the rules and prayed in the men’s area, about 20 feet behind the men gathered for Ramadan prayers.

Later, an all-male tribunal tried to ban me. An elder suggested having men surround me at the mosque so that I would be “scared off.” Now the man across the table was telling me to shut up.

“I won’t stop writing,” I said.

It was the first time a fellow Muslim had pressed me to refrain from criticizing the way our faith was practiced. But in the past decade, such attempts at censorship have become more common. This is largely because of the rising power and influence of the “ghairat brigade,” an honor corps that tries to silence debate on extremist ideology in order to protect the image of Islam. It meets even sound critiques with hideous, disproportionate responses.

The campaign began, at least in its modern form, 10 years ago in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, when the Organization of Islamic Cooperation — a mini-United Nations comprising the world’s 56 countries with large Muslim populations, plus the Palestinian Authority — tasked then-Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu with combating Islamophobia and projecting the “true values of Islam.” During the past decade, a loose honor brigade has sprung up, in part funded and supported by the OIC through annual conferences, reports and communiques. It’s made up of politicians, diplomats, writers, academics, bloggers and activists.

In 2007, as part of this playbook, the OIC launched the Islamophobia Observatory, a watchdog group based in Jiddah, Saudi Arabia, with the goal of documenting slights against the faith. Its first report, released the following year, complained that the artists and publishers of controversial Danish cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad were defiling “sacred symbols of Islam . . . in an insulting, offensive and contemptuous manner.” The honor brigade began calling out academics, writers and others, including former New York police commissioner Ray Kelly and administrators at a Catholic school in Britain that turned away a mother who wouldn’t remove her face veil.

“The OIC invented the anti-‘Islamophobia’ movement,” says Zuhdi Jasser, president of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy and a frequent target of the honor brigade. “These countries . . . think they own the Muslim community and all interpretations of Islam.”

Alongside the honor brigade’s official channel, a community of self-styled blasphemy police — from anonymous blogs such as LoonWatch.com and Ikhras.com to a large and disparate cast of social-media activists — arose and began trying to control the debate on Islam. This wider corps throws the label of “Islamophobe” on pundits, journalists and others who dare to talk about extremist ideology in the religion. Their targets are as large as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and as small as me.

The official and unofficial channels work in tandem, harassing, threatening and battling introspective Muslims and non-Muslims everywhere. They bank on an important truth: Islam, as practiced from Malaysia to Morocco, is a shame-based, patriarchal culture that values honor and face-saving from the family to the public square. Which is why the bullying often works to silence critics of Islamic extremism….

In an e-mail exchange, the OIC’s ambassador to the United Nations denied that the organization tries to silence discussion of problems in Muslim communities.

The attacks are everywhere. Soon after the Islamophobia Observatory took shape, Sheik Sabah Ahmed al-Sabah, the emir of Kuwait, grumbled about “defamatory caricatures of our Master and Prophet Muhammad” and films that smear Islam, according to the OIC’s first Islamophobia report.

The OIC helped give birth to a culture of victimization. In speeches, blogs, articles and interviews widely broadcast in the Muslim press, its honor brigade has targeted pundits, political leaders and writers — from TV host Bill Maher to atheist author Richard Dawkins — for insulting Islam. Writer Glenn Greenwald has supported the campaign to brand writers and thinkers, such as neuroscientist and atheist Sam Harris, as having “anti-Muslim animus” just for criticizing Islam.

“These fellow travelers have made it increasingly unpleasant — and even dangerous — to discuss the link between Muslim violence and specific religious ideas, like jihad, martyrdom and blasphemy,” Harris tells me.

Noticing the beginnings of this trend in December 2007, a U.S. diplomat in Istanbul dispatched a cable to the National Security Council, the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency and various State Department offices. The cable said the OIC’s chief called supporters of the Danish cartoons of Muhammad “extremists of freedom of expression” and equated them with al-Qaeda.

Most of the criticism takes place online, with anonymous bloggers targeting supposed Islamophobes. Not long after the cable, a network of bloggers launched LoonWatch, which goes after Christians, Jews, Hindus, atheists and other Muslims. The bloggers have labeled Somali author Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a born Muslim but now an atheist opponent of Islamic extremism, an “anti-Muslim crusader.” Robert Spencer, a critic of extremist Islam, has been called a “vicious hate preacher” and an “Internet sociopath.” The insults may look similar to Internet trolling and vitriolic comments you can find on any blog or news site. But they’re more coordinated, frightening and persistent.

One prominent target of the honor brigade’s attacks was Charlie Hebdo, the French newspaper where several staffers were recently killed by Islamic extremists. According to some accounts, as the killers massacred cartoonists, they shouted: “We have avenged the prophet Muhammad.” The OIC denounced the killings, but in a 2012 report, it also condemned the magazine’s “Islamophobic satires.” Its then-secretary general, Ihsanoglu, said the magazine’s “history of attacking Muslim sentiments” was “an outrageous act of incitement and hatred and abuse of freedom of expression.”

Charlie Hebdo is not the only evidence that, to self-appointed defenders of the faith, a call to kill the message can very easily become a plan to kill the messenger. In January 2011, a security officer for the governor of Pakistan’s Punjab province, Salman Taseer, assassinated him after Taseer defended a Christian woman accused of blasphemy. In court, supporters laid flowers on the shoulders of the assassin in approval…..

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, free speech, journalistic bias, Organization of Islamic Cooperation Tagged With: Asra Q. Nomani


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. cs says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 11:49 am

    Behead, draw the blood, we were offended, just blood will calm down, just blood.

    BARBARISM.

    • mortimer says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 1:03 pm

      -K.11.173 “Believers, RETALIATION is decreed for you in BLOODSHED.”

      -K.58:5 “Those who oppose (verbally) Allah and His Messenger will be laid low”…with violence.

      -K.9:11-12 “But if they violate their oaths after their covenant, and TAUNT YOU for your Faith, – FIGHT (and KILL) ye the chiefs of Unfaith, for their oaths are nothing to them, that thus they may be restrained” …(from criticizing Islam).

      Every Muslim is authorized to murder non-Muslim blasphemers.

      • Aardvark says

        Jan 18, 2015 at 5:37 am

        “for their oaths are nothing to them,”

        Classic Pot calling the Kettle black!

  2. thomas pellow says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 11:50 am

    Doesn’t this confirm that Islam as an ideology is a political continuum from OIC to IS?

    • mortimer says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 1:05 pm

      Yes (in answer to your question). OIC and ISIS are consistent expressions of Islamic supremacism…often called ‘Islamism’ or ‘political Islam’.

      Their mutual goals are world domination through political and military means.

  3. Jet Jaguar says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 11:59 am

    They are our masters whom we dare not criticize.

    • mortimer says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 1:06 pm

      They are not YET our masters, but they are our EXTORTIONISTS.

  4. Oh Shiite says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 12:05 pm

    IM OFFENDED!!!!!

    Those placard wavers have made spelling errors, this cannot be tolerated, they’ve maligned the English language. Off with their heads it’s the only retribution for poor spelling.

    Just highlighting how silly all this huffing and puffing about a few innocuous cartoons is, there’s a whole group of people hell bent on murdering in the name of some made up text. Religion of peace, you must be kidding, anyone who tries to peddle that lie should never be trusted and instead be feared, that’s the MSM and most leaders in the West.

    Humans, they’ll believe any old crap.

    • Champ says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 4:22 pm

      Religion of peace, you must be kidding, anyone who tries to peddle that lie should never be trusted and instead be feared …

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

      Bravo, Oh Shiite!! …hear, hear

      • Rezali Mehil says

        Jan 17, 2015 at 5:50 pm

        be honest champ…

        You would be bored without Islam …wouldn’t you….

        You are the one peddling the nonsense… you wafer thin wannabe christian.

        More Later…

        Rezali

        • Jay Boo says

          Jan 17, 2015 at 7:29 pm

          Hello Rezali, the wanabe human being stuck in the muck of Islam.
          It is a shame you have invested (wasted) so much time and effort trying to please and impress a spiteful Allah. Some Muslims even flog themselves to appease Allah.
          This is so very disturbing. Even you must agree that Allah of Islam would have to be a beast to be pleased by such groveling submission.

          The Good News: The imams around here have been dumping Islam.
          I think I hear one calling to prayer.
          Leaning on the Everlasting Arms(New Grace-Bluegrass Gospel)

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 17, 2015 at 8:04 pm

          The vile Rezali Mehil wrote, replying to Champ:

          be honest champ…

          You would be bored without Islam …wouldn’t you….
          ………………………………

          I’m sure we’d *all* prefer to be something else—but ignoring Islam is just going to embolden Rezali Mehil’s violent, oppressive coreligionists.

          Notice that she has *no* problem with Islam’s efforts to shut Infidels up. And why would she? She is trying to do the same.

          More:

          You are the one peddling the nonsense… you wafer thin wannabe christian.
          ………………………………

          What she means by this is that Champ dares to oppose Jihad and Shari’ah. Rezali Mehil would have us believe that if Christians do anything other than roll over for Islamic savagery, including laying their throats on the sword, then they are not “real Christians”.

          Of course, she would be happy if all Christians simply surrendered to their Muslim overlords.

          Not going to happen…

        • Champ says

          Jan 17, 2015 at 11:01 pm

          Great comeback, Graven!! ..hear, hear

        • Champ says

          Jan 17, 2015 at 11:02 pm

          Exactly right, Jay Boo!

        • Joginder Singh says

          Jan 18, 2015 at 4:53 am

          rezali mehil please crawl back to the 7th century and take your pedophile muhammad and your cult of islam and the rest of its mindless followers with you as the rest of us who have seem islam for the violent racist cult it is prefer life in the 21st century. We are on our way to Mars while muslims and islam have yet to leave the 7th century and never will

        • Rezali Mehil says

          Jan 18, 2015 at 12:14 pm

          Jayboo says….

          Some Muslims even flog themselves to appease Allah.This is so very disturbing.
          Even you must agree that Allah of Islam would have to be a beast to be pleased by such groveling submission.

          Jay – IMHO there is little wrong in flogging yourself – (you are not hurting anybody else). You are being honest to yourself and try to establish a direct connection to your God through pain and submission. Chaining, whipping, self beating – it’s all goodness – each sharp scream gets you closer – you must ask God why you were not there be beside Imam Hussain (RA) – why be born so many years later.

          Being a woman, I kind of restrict myself to chest and breast beating and yes sex with my husband touching me afterwards is difficult for days – but he is very understanding and gives healing time – such are the blessings from Allah SWT.

          It just amuses me how kuffar run to A&E (accident and emergency) for the tiniest cut – bear it and live with pain a little – it is better for you in the long run.

          Joginder – good to hear from you – jousting to come no doubt.

          More Later …..

          Rezali

        • Mirren10 says

          Jan 18, 2015 at 3:33 pm

          I see rezali the repulsive is back again, to try some more ham-fisted ( 🙂 ) dawah.

          ”Jay – IMHO there is little wrong in flogging yourself – (you are not hurting anybody else). You are being honest to yourself and try to establish a direct connection to your God through pain and submission. Chaining, whipping, self beating – it’s all goodness – each sharp scream gets you closer”

          **Very** illustrative of the revolting, cruel, and masochistic mohammedan mindset.

          ”A direct connection to God through pain and submission ?” Blech.

          ”chaining, whipping, self beating … each sharp scream gets you closer”. Even more blech !

          Poor old rezali must think the Memoirs of the Marquis de Sade are a ‘direct connection to God’ !!! 🙂

          In fact, his post reads like the Masochists Manual !

          ”Being a woman, I kind of restrict myself to chest and breast beating and yes sex with my husband touching me afterwards is difficult for days – but he is very understanding and gives healing time … ”

          I’d say this was too much information, except of course, rezali is actually a man – perhaps he’s confiding to us his position of being *on top* with his bachi bazi boy ?

          More later, chumbawumba !

  5. Lesley says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 12:41 pm

    Islamists rally, scheme, and massacre to bend us to their will. If they spent more time trying to bring their backwards ideology into the 21st century (and learning to spell, duh), then we wouldn’t have the problems the world is having. Even the name ‘Boko Haram’ is in itself an edict against modern, Western education.

    Doubtless, there are smart Muslims, but they are more functional people who are able to make decisions for themselves, instead of blindly following the commands of a 7th century barbarian. Bow to Islam and this is what we will get. Attack of the dum dums… more folks who approve of shooting that poor, brave girl, Malala in the head for daring to be an advocate for education, and themselves can’t even spell.

    • Ross says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 7:20 pm

      Boko Haram is literally translated to “Books bad”. Sounds like something Tarzan might say. It’s obvious that they think little of books. What idiots.

      • Sam Hawkins says

        Jan 17, 2015 at 7:44 pm

        Or, as Robert Spencer memorably translated once:

        BOOK, HE BAD!

      • bernie says

        Jan 17, 2015 at 10:33 pm

        Tarzan can at least express intelligent thoughts in pidgin English however. “Me Tarzan, you Jane” isn’t nonsensical in and of itself, while “Books bad” is an idiotic statement. If one said “Books good” or “Books be good” that would make sense.

        • pumbar says

          Jan 17, 2015 at 11:30 pm

          Have you read “Twilight”?

        • Joginder Singh says

          Jan 18, 2015 at 4:56 am

          I trust that in saying “Books Bad” you are referring only to that foul tome the quran

      • Aardvark says

        Jan 18, 2015 at 5:44 am

        “Boko Haram is literally translated to “Books bad”. Sounds like something Tarzan might say.”

        Only in the films, which were rubbish. In the books Tarzan teaches himself to read, using the children’s picture books left by his dead parents.

  6. London Jim says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 12:59 pm

    Interesting times, as our bastion friend Wellington is wont saying. . . How strange it is to find ourselves, here in the Age of Science, deliberating knowledge of the difference beween right ‘n wrong. Seems to me that writers and custodians of the Genesis story understood something fundamental in the core of this ‘life’ thingumygig. . However, that is not allowed in Islamic doctrine, kinda showing that doctrine to be nullvoid.

  7. Spot On says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 1:01 pm

    They believe more in the blood and guts of the 7th century. Our Intelligencia prefers to bow down to their riligeon.

  8. RCCA says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 1:06 pm

    “How many other Muslims are doing so? If the mainstream narrative were true, there would be thousands. But instead, there is just one.”

    There are Jasser and his group American Islamic Forum for Democracy (https://www.facebook.com/AmericanIslamicForumForDemocracy) as was mentioned, the Muslims for Progressive Values (https://www.facebook.com/mpvusa), Universalist Muslims (https://www.facebook.com/universalistmuslims) — there are literally thousands of likes for these groups.

    That’s not really a huge number but it’s a start.

    • RCCA says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 1:22 pm

      PS That said, I think what is happening to the website pamelageller.com and the campaign to shut her down is hideous. I don’t know the process of carrying out a denial of service attack and how many people/computers are involved but it’s probably a lot and demonstrates the need to continue the fight against the so called “moderate” Muslim world. It’s quite shocking her site is still down after all this time.

  9. boakai ngombu says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 1:12 pm

    Robert is right on and others are aware:

    “The United States also needs to check and defeat what is arguably the single most important instrument of political warfare now being wielded against us by our shariah-adherent enemies: the Organization of Islamic Cooperation….”

    (p9/10) of http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Secure_Freedom_Strategy_01-16-15.pdf

  10. saturnine says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 1:16 pm

    Posted this as a comment on the WaPo article, but it has disappeared:

    I commend the author on her courage and determination. However, I am quite sure her efforts will not succeed, for what she is planning to do to Islam is precisely what Islam condemns Jews and Christians for doing to their religions (e.g., the Fatiha).

    You see, Mohammed positioned his religion as the same as that of the prior prophets (Jesus, Moses, and others) whose followers either ignored the teachings (the Jews) or corrupted them (the Christians). Not wanting his teachings to suffer the same fate, Mohammed inoculated Islam with a very powerful immune system to protect it from change (bid`ah). Anything that threatens to alter the scriptures or the established interpretation of them, or lead believers astray or to doubt is countered by Muslim antibodies acting under color of scripture — with violence if necessary — to suppress or eliminate the infection. Muslims are proud of this aspect of Islam, which they believe has kept it pure, as it was during the time of Mohammed, unweathered by time or human hands.

    Unfortunately for everyone, this means Islamic intimidation, coercion, and violence can only be put into remission. It can never be cured.

  11. Walter Sieruk says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 1:27 pm

    What a weak religion .It can’t stand up to criticism.

    • mortimer says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 1:35 pm

      Islam is a political system that includes a state religion. Much more than ‘religion’ as the word ‘deen’ is usually translated.

      ‘Deen’ is related to the Hebrew word ‘din’ which means ‘law’. ‘Deen’ is better translated to English as ‘governance’, ‘legal system’, ‘establishment’, ‘corporation’, ‘political philosphy’ or even ‘constitution’ to express its inclusiveness.

      In other words, Islam is a divine system of governance.

  12. mortimer says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 1:27 pm

    When they burn books, they will soon burn people.

    OIC wants to burn the books, journals and newspapers and crush the freedom of the Internet.

    This is wonderful quote: ““These fellow travelers have made it increasingly unpleasant — and even dangerous — to discuss the link between Muslim violence and specific religious ideas, like jihad, martyrdom and blasphemy,” Harris tells me.”

    Yes…jihad, martyrdom and blasphemy have NOTHING TO DO WITH ISLAM!

  13. james says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 1:33 pm

    I hope this comment goes on and you allow me to put my point as well. Islam does not silence anyone or Muslims but everywhere rules need to be set out. Freedom of Speech is a good thing but no one can insult you or your religion!!! A line needs to be drawn!! we do our job to teach Muslims what real jihad is http://www.jihad.info and you teach yours to respect all religion!!! How about this??

    • Jen says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 2:48 pm

      For something to be worthy of respect it needs to be respectable. The key figure in Islam is Muhammad and Muhammad, your prophet, was a pedophile. Deal with it.

      • Roderick MacUalraig says

        Jan 18, 2015 at 1:30 am

        Perfect response.

      • Joginder Singh says

        Jan 18, 2015 at 5:01 am

        And dont forget about the rest of the pedophile muhammad package ie the war criminal, the slave owner and trader, the racist, the gangster, the con-man, anti-semite, anti gay, anti-woman, the protection racketeer, the thug, the cult leader and anything else I have forgotten

    • Know Thy Enemy says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 6:39 pm

      “we do our job to teach Muslims what real jihad is……and you teach yours to respect all religion!!! How about this??”

      And if we refuse to teach ours to respect Islam, then what? Then you will start teaching Muslims about some unreal form of jihad??

      OK….. go ahead and do that! But we are only going to be bashing that fiend that you call “messenger of Allah”

    • duh_swami says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 7:47 pm

      James…We have no need of thee, your evil religion or your deranged ‘prophet’. I am going to insult and slander Allah and Mahound any time I feel like it…I hope that’s OK with you…

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 8:35 pm

      james—I wonder what his Muslim name is?—wrote:

      I hope this comment goes on and you allow me to put my point as well. Islam does not silence anyone or Muslims but everywhere rules need to be set out.
      ………………………………..

      Muslims “does not silence anyone”, but they will murder you if you dare criticize Islam.

      And “rules need to be set out”—in other words, Muslims have the right to crush freedom of speech. In the article on freedom of speech at his appalling site, he blames the victims if they are murdered by his vicious coreligonists:

      “The world is a gift to human kind and we are all equally responsible to save it from falling into the hands of terrorists and those who provoke these terrorists by their misunderstanding of freedom.”

      Daring to say that Islam is violent is a “misunderstanding of freedom”, and if you say so, you are “provoking” Muslims.

      More:

      Freedom of Speech is a good thing but no one can insult you or your religion!!! A line needs to be drawn!!
      ………………………………..

      Muslims consider *any* criticism or even questioning of Islam to be an “insult”—hence, you can’t say anything critical of Jihad slaughter, Muslim supremacy, the horror of brutal Shari’ah law, the stoning of rape victims, or the rape of nine-year-old girls.

      More:

      we do our job to teach Muslims what real jihad is http://www.jihad.info and you teach yours to respect all religion!!! How about this??
      ………………………………..

      By “all religion”, of course, “james” means Islam.

      In his link, he implies that the focus on Jihad as violent is the fault of the “media”—not the fault of his homicidal coreligonists murdering cartoonists and other innocent people.

      He notes that violent Jihad is only acceptable (in the absence of a Caliph, which he doesn’t mention) if Infidels begin ‘fighting against Islam’.

      What he won’t tell you is that if Infidels say *anything* negative about Islam—even noting that it is frequently violent—then this is taken as fighting against Islam, and makes any savagery against us perfectly Halal.

      He “made his point”, all right—all too well. *Ugh*.

    • bernie says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 10:38 pm

      Many Muslims consider it an insult to Islam simply if one believes in a Triune God (Christianity), or doesn’t generally view Muhammad as a prophet (Judaism), or believes in a plurality of Gods (polytheistic faiths) or doesn’t believe in any god or gods (atheism). Or, even if one is a monotheist who doesn’t agree with the Muslim concept of Allah (such as Sikhism).

    • RonaldB says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 11:15 pm

      “Islam does not silence anyone or Muslims but everywhere rules need to be set out.”

      James,

      By claiming Islam doesn’t silence anyone, what you’re doing it putting lipstick on a pig and calling it Miss America. But the pig is still a pig, and Islam is Islam.

      Am I insulting you by comparing Islam to a pig, and do you wish to kill me? Does my insulting Islam make your job of teaching Muslims not to kill wantonly more difficult? Or, perhaps your peaceful teachings don’t extend to those who insult Islam, and so your counter-jihad “teachings” have no relevance to someone who really insults Islam, since they are subject to death anyway?

      So many questions, James. I can sympathize with how you wish for all criticism of Islam to stop, so your job of trying to get Muslims to not follow their natural inclinations to kill blasphemers becomes so much easier.

  14. IQ al Rassooli says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 1:40 pm

    Calling Islam a Religion and or Peaceful rank as two of the most egregious lies that have ever been insinuated into the human conciousness

    No matter how much Muslims try their worst to PERVERT History, Theology & Reality, they cannot ever change the FACT that their god called Allah is most assuredly NOT the same as the God of the Bible

    Since Allah is NOT the same as the God of Jesus Moses & Abraham, then no god called Allah and no angel called Gabriel ever revealed the verses of the Quran to Muhammad because every letter, word, verse and chapter in the Quran are the sole product of Muhammad’s imagination; the secretions of his WARPED mind but cleverly projected into the unsuspecting mouths of Allah & Gabriel to give them the aura of sanctity and divinity

    For those brain dead who still think the Islam & Muslims are peaceful, just look at the following:

    Fear of Muslims is RATIONAL http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJnW8HRHLLw

    IQ al Rassooli
    Kafir & Proud!

    • Jen says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 2:54 pm

      Thanks for the link. I’m downloading all educational videos on my computer, just in case Youtube continues to remove them, while leaving pro-Islam videos up.
      If anyone wants to save youtube videos on their computer they can use this link http://en.savefrom.net/ and copy/paste the URL that they want to download from.

    • terry says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 6:24 pm

      Thanks a lot IQ, well done!

      Straight to the point, precise, effective and efficient, are some of the qualities that this video has. It takes very obvious facts about Islam’s reality in the world today, puts them in point form and then they are presented intelligently!

      I wish you all success in this important work, you’re doing

  15. AlanCrusader says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 1:49 pm

    Hey OIC Apartheid, Supremacist, Jihadist Muslims who read this fantastic truth about Islam site…At Casablanca in 1942, even the leftist US president has this to say on the topic of finishing world war two with only the UNCONDITIONAL surrender of Nazis (Islam is the same) : “Roosevelt…”it does mean the destruction of PHILOSOPHIES in these countries which are based on conquest and subjugation of other people”. Casablanca 1942…, Islam’s JIHAD and SHARIA Ideology must be defeated as it subjugates non Muslims! Unconditional surrender is the standard to go by when destroying Islam’s terror!

  16. marx says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 2:02 pm

    I got into heated conversation with an English tourist from UK about Islam and European Muslims ,He was a leftist but we agreed on some issues . during the conversation , I was telling him about THE NO GO ZONES in Europe ,he denied it and told me I’ve been reading from right wing websites who tends to exaggerate it . Can anyone who lives inside UK or France confirm it and give some some website I can read from ,I live in middle east and I’ve never been to Europe.

    • Michael Copeland says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 5:39 pm

      http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2006/11/the-751-no-go-zones-of-france

      An internet search of “no-go zones” will yield more information.

    • pumbar says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 11:40 pm

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2541635/Murders-rapes-going-unreported-no-zones-police-minority-communities-launch-justice-systems.html

  17. james says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 2:52 pm

    using profanity is your asset not Muslims!!!
    Having lack of knowledge about religion is what makes most people ignorant like you!!!

    Here is from your own one used to be though!!

    • Jen says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 2:57 pm

      Islam itself is the definition of profanity. There is no way that the world should trust anyone who thinks Islam should be respected. Muhammad was a pedophile. Deal with it.

    • terry says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 6:01 pm

      “Having lack of knowledge about religion is what makes most people ignorant like you!!!”

      Who is lacking in knowledge about religion, here? Are you serious?

      People like you, think that they are rational, their cerebral cortex is at the helm, directing all their behaviour and thinking while in reality it’s their amygdala that is doing the whole job.

      N.B. If you don’t know what I am talking about, google it.

    • Know Thy Enemy says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 6:53 pm

      The word “Muslim” is itself a profanity. Don’t believe me? Ok…go out and tell someone that you are a Muslim, and just see how hard the person tries to control his revulsion and disgust! Even Obama will kick you out of WH in no time if he realizes that there is nothing to gain from you!

      So tell me james, what have you done that you think you deserve to inflict your own self with such profanity? Have some self respect, will ya?

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 9:04 pm

      Here’s the appalling “james”—I wonder what his Muslim name is?—posting a sickening segment from the “Deen Show” on the rape of little Aisha.

      The nasty Yusuf Estes assures us that there was no “oppression” in the “Prophet” marrying a child, and that a child of nine is a “woman”.

      He also points to the fact that poor Aisha—who was widowed when she was just 18 years old (the age at which most young girls are just starting to *think about* marriage)—never remarried. He cites this as supposed proof that she loved the pedophilic rapist Muhammed.

      But the fact was that Muhammed’s wives were *prevented* from remarrying—so this girl lived a sad, inverted life—raped as a young girl, then forced into celibacy when she was just old enough to take an actual interest in boys.

      Why do Muslim apologists like “james” believe that sick things like this make Islam look better?

      Because they are so steeped in the horrors of Islam that they cannot imagine why any decent person would have any problem with pedophilia, caravan-raiding, raping captives, slaving, or mass murder.

      After all, the “Prophet” engaged in all of these atrocities, and all Muslims regard this sociopath as the “perfect man”. *Ugh*.

  18. Champ says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 3:01 pm

    What they call an insult is really the Truth …muhammad was probably the worst criminal known to man, and that’s putting it mildly.

    There are many notorious criminals throughout history, and muhammad was definitely one of them. I don’t know, perhaps he belongs at the top of the list, but for sure he’s *on* the list ..and muslims just can’t deal with this fact.

  19. Jay Boo says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 3:02 pm

    A message from Allah.

    Hey those cartoons were funny as hell.
    I hate that little shit Muhammad.
    Do you have any idea what it is like being trapped inside his evil twister brain as he roasts in hell?
    Man is it hot in here.

    “Fight them until they say no god but Allah”
    Huh! What kind of crap is that for someone claiming to be a prophet to say.
    Might as well admit to the whole world that Allah has no real power of his own without Muslim dumb asses.
    Hey Muhammad can you hear me?
    Go ahead Muhammad and have a temper tantrum and threaten to throw yourself off of a cliff.
    You create me Muhammad and now you will have to listen as I mock you forever in hell.
    72 pubescent virgins?
    You sick disgusting perv.
    Muhammad your whole life is a sordid cartoon.
    What a buffoon. Go ahead and jump off that cliff and split your head open and let your Allah genie escape this humiliation of being trapped inside your vile head rather than a simple corked bottle like the other genies and jinns.

  20. somehistory says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 3:28 pm

    The writer, as a muslim, knows all of this and remains muslim? Incredible.
    She wrote:
    ” a shame-based, patriarchal culture that values honor and face-saving from the family to the public square. Which is why the bullying often works…”
    *****************************************************************
    It only works if the person is too afraid to stand up for truth. If one speaks and acts on truth, there is nothing for which to be ashamed…no one can “shame” them at home in the family or in the public square. Terrify maybe. But being afraid doesn’t mean they should be ashamed.
    Is the writer afraid to leave islam? She seems to know the truth of it…at least to a degree.
    ************************************************************************************************************
    She write: “…
    silence debate on extremist ideology in order to protect the image of Islam.”
    ***************************************************************************************************
    The “image” is described in Revelation 13. Not worth any protection and soon to be no more.

  21. Bamaguje says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 5:29 pm

    Are we sure this Asra Nomani babe is a Muslima?
    She sounds too broad minded and intelligent to subscribe to that intolerant devilish cult.

    “Writer Glenn Greenwald has supported the campaign to brand writers and thinkers, such as neuroscientist and atheist Sam Harris, as having “anti-Muslim animus” just for criticizing Islam” – Asra Nomani.

    Would that be the same Glenn Greenwald who conspired with Edward Snowden to leak NSA surveillance secrets?
    Mr Greenwald has his priorities absurdly wrong. Islam is a far more dangerous threat to our freedoms and liberties than NSA.

    • RonaldB says

      Jan 17, 2015 at 11:49 pm

      “Are we sure this Asra Nomani babe is a Muslima?”

      Yes. There are prominent Muslims, Zudhi Jasser, Irshad Manji, and Asra Normani among others (but not too many others, apparently), who oppose the efforts of Muslims to follow the teachings of Islam, and yet continue to call themselves Muslim.

      To be a Muslim means to consider Muhammad the perfect man. This is the same Muhammad who systematically robbed peaceful caravans, murdered opponents and critics, beheaded 900 Jewish men in the marketplace, sold the women and pre-adolescents into slavery, married the woman whose husband he had just murdered, and systematically assassinated his critics once he reconquered Mecca.

      These Muslims worship with the words of Muhammad.

      How in the world can any decent person even think about Muhammad without skin-crawling revulsion, let alone worship with his words?

      I don’t understand these Muslim “reformers”. I don’t understand how they can continue to idolize Muhammad, while presenting themselves as decent human beings.

      In the case of Irshad Manji, I have read her book several times. I think there’s a strong narcissistic element in her thinking. She thinks that simply because she has a perspective, and that she is a Muslim, that she can pull Islam from being a violent, misogynistic world view to a benign, liberal religion. Why doesn’t she leave Islam? Mainly, I think, that she would no longer get the same attention. She would go from being a brave Muslim reformer to just another Muslim apostate who deals in rational arguments and not in paradoxes.

      Similarly, Muslims like Asra Nomani grew up in a liberal environment, dressed in normal clothes, avoids Muslim garb like the plague, and figures because they can express themselves while Muslim, so can everyone. The Jihadis, who pressure her, intimidate her, and threaten her, are simply nuisances. To her, her life is an illustration of Islam, and not the accurate Koran and Hadith quotations given by real Jihadis and over a thousand years of Jihadist interpretation of Islam by the most preeminent Islamic scholars.

      • Bamaguje says

        Jan 18, 2015 at 7:58 am

        “Why doesn’t she (Irshad Manji) leave Islam? Mainly, I think, that she would no longer get the same attention. She would go from being a brave Muslim reformer to just another Muslim apostate who deals in rational arguments and not in paradoxes” – RonaldB.

        I think you hit the nail right on the head. These pseudo-Muslims (Irshad Manji, Asra Nomani etc) keep pretending they are Muslims because they hope to help change Islam from within. Muslims and the quisling lamestream media are unlikley to listen to them if they were outright apostates.
        Washington Post would not have published Asra Nomani’s article if she were an ex-Muslim attacking Islam.

  22. Michael Copeland says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 5:37 pm

    “Islam is a religion of power, fighting, jihad, beheading and bloodshed.”
    Imam Hussein Bin Mahmoud, prominent writer

  23. Michael Copeland says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 6:41 pm

    The cartoonist of the cover picture explained that he is depicting Mohammed as a compassionate caring leader, weeping at the actions of the misguided few who have misunderstood their peaceful religion. How badly mistaken he is, though David Cameron would back him. Those who bother to find out about Islam will know this is a myth, dishonestly propagated by Islam’s “taqiyya” artists. Mohammed was a ruthless warlord who had critics, like Asma bint Marwan, murdered.

  24. Richie says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 8:05 pm

    So let me get this straight- Muslims demand we not insult a religion that promotes violence, because if we do, they will threaten us with violence

  25. David says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 8:36 pm

    Is it not blasphemy to abbreviate the name of moHAMmed?

  26. gravenimage says

    Jan 17, 2015 at 9:20 pm

    It’s difficult to know how to regard Asra Nomani. She has indeed said some things against Jihad—including condemning the beheading of Danny Pearl—but her focus is far more on Muslim women taking a more equal role in the Mosque, which is not necessarily good news for Infidels, since many Muslimahs just regard this as a way to be more directly involved in violent Jihad.

    And she will not actually say anything critical of the oppressive “Prophet”, pretending instead that he was perfectly egalitarian.

    And while she may hope to be a genuine reformer of Islam—in some limited way, at least—she also gives false hope to a lot of Infidels, who assume that there are many Muslims like her, which is anything but the case.

    • RonaldB says

      Jan 18, 2015 at 12:10 am

      Gravenimage,

      I appreciate the care with which you researched and demolished the references that James gave us to prove….who knows what? I couldn’t sit through the whole horrible video so I appreciate that you did.

      The question is, are “reformers” like Asra speaking primarily to Muslims, or are they speaking to non-Muslims? Do they serve the function of genuinely moderating Islam, or do they convince Westerners that Islam, properly observed, can be benign?

      Or, perhaps they serve to open the debate that Western societies, and the US in particular, so desperately need, by making it fashionable to actually debate the merits of Islam, rather than to simply claim it was misinterpreted.

    • Demsci says

      Jan 18, 2015 at 9:19 am

      Gravenimage, I do read your incisive, informative responses to Muslims, here and also the other day to ShabeerHassan. And they serve to inspire me. Information that you, and others, here gave me I did use. in conversations with both political correct ignorant Westerners + Muslims. In my experience both are very impatient, illogical, resistent. But from more independent people I get support and even appreciation for it.

      My position still is that of Daniel Pipes and also of Ryan Mauro, he seems to be the leader of Clarion Project. So I am not on my own. It seems there are counter-jihadists in a broad spectrum.
      Yes, the reformists among the Muslims are few and far between. But they are who Pipes and Mauro point to.

      Asra Nomani mentioned Sam Harris as sort of ally. She also supported Rupert Murdoch in that she too wanted to hold Muslims responsible. Presumably for the cancer in their midst.

      We already had discussions about Al-Sisi and mayor Aboutaleb.

      Many of you think that Islam is hopeless and my logic and experience tells me the same. But we should, with the help of the likes of Nomani, Aboutaleb, Al Sisi, try to challenge the Muslims.

      Nomani talks about Ijtihad-movement. We know how important the belief that they are trying to obey Allah and Mohammed is to all Muslims. But we can also try the paradigm that Quran-Hadiths-Sira are multi-interpretable. This is what both Pipes, Maura and the likes of Nomani, Aboutaleb are implying.

      The battlefield as I see it is among the damn often good hearted ignorant western voters, who were shocked by the Charlie Hebdo massacre. They still in large numbers refuse to believe the paradigm: “Islam is all bad, and only about supremacism and violent jihad”. But they might accept “multi-interpretability of Islam, which enables the radical Muslims to act in the name of Islam”.

      They might change if we take Nomani and Aboutaleb at their word and call their bluff if you like. We could, for argument’s sake, tell the Muslims and Political Corrects that the fault of Islam lies in the multi-interpretability and in the fact that Islam has no conditions on membership. So that it cannot throw out it’s rotten appels, even if they run into the millions and make all Muslims positively untrustworthy.

      Ijtihad, “new Islam”, “Democratic Islam” can aim to let Muslims keep obeying Allah and Mohammed, but through a different interpretation. It can formulate and publish conditions upon membership of it. It could be the “positive deviation” among Muslims, whereas nowadays Obama, Cameron, political corrects and Muslims ad nauseam try to defend Islam’s innocence by calling radical Islam a negative deviation.

      But if a positive deviation were in existence; think of the possibilities, instead of only the risks (of deceiving the Westerners); In due time we could demand from immigrating and even Resident Muslims that they are MEMBER of Ijtihad, “New Islam” or “democratic Islam”.

      Membership of it then is conditional, on conditions we negotiate. We might in future differentiate between members of “Democratic Islam” and all the rest of the Muslims. And sell this logically to our good hearted, confused, as yet ignorant fellow Westerners.

      And if you and JW are vehemently opposed to this, you still will not nearly be as opposed to it as the majority of Muslims everywhere will be. When we differ between “democratic Muslims” and “ordinary Muslims” they will SCREAM DISCRIMINATION. But we will only be doing what Nomani, Aboutaleb and Al Sisi urged us to do; holding them, or their leaders, accountable for their choice of religion! By giving them or demanding from them, the choice of “democratic Islam” while still obeying Allah and Mohammed.

  27. duh_swami says

    Jan 18, 2015 at 7:35 am

    If a reformer continues to believe Allah is god, then they are not a reformer, they are a faker. Never trust anyone who believes Allah is god…

  28. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Jan 18, 2015 at 10:07 am

    … (WaPo) did so because the author is a Muslim with (from the looks of this article) an apparent breezy confidence in an imminent massive reformation of Islam.

    From one fantasy to another. They ain’t this or that, this didn’t cause those, and even if these things were real, we can reform it like others did. This is a fictive reality bubble that is a small sphere hanging off the side of the big Islam bubble.

    I’m surprised that the WaPo didn’t insist that to be publishable the piece must account for certain commands in the Holy Ko-Ran. But they didn’t. Maybe Krauthammer can write a biting column criticizing this massive error.

  29. Bazza says

    Jan 18, 2015 at 11:56 am

    I still remain absolutely amazed, regarding the ‘Solidarity rally of world leaders and peoples’ held in Paris, post ‘Charlie Hebdo and the Kosher supermarket’ slaughter of innocents!
    Among the World leaders to attend, was the democratically-elected PM of Israel, Benjamin Netanyau, along with the leader of the terrorist group, the Palestine Liberation Organization, Mahmoud Abbas.
    Amazingly, Netanyau, who was clearly, and correctly present, to represent the slaughtered Jews and other innocents, was asked not to attend, and when he did, was further asked to leave by President Hollande!
    Mahmoud Abbas on the other hand, who could only have been present to represent, and show solidarity with, the three Muslim terrorists involved, was welcomed with open arms, by the same, President Hollande!
    I’m no ‘fanatic’ by any stretch of the imagination, but, does anyone else feel as utterly sickened as I am, with this action by the French?

  30. Sam says

    Jan 18, 2015 at 11:57 am

    Evil can only be defeated by FORCE. So let’s arm ourselves with knowledge of Islam and GUNS.

  31. Ron R says

    Jan 18, 2015 at 3:00 pm

    First of all I would like to thank Robert and all those who are exposing the political underpinnings of Islam.

    I would dearly love to see western leaders exclude Islam from freedom of religion laws, since beneath the thin covering of religious observances and ceremonies lies an Arab supremacist ideology with legal, economic and political components which far outweigh the religious ones.

    As for claims that critics of Islam are “racists”, nothing could be further from the truth. Islam is an ideology, not a race of people. It is that ideology of total world domination that is being criticized, and if the people who follow it are offended,then so be it.

    Not since the height of the Cold War has any one group of followers been so dangerous to world peace. During that time, it was Communist cells which were scattered all over the world. Now it is Muslim cells scattered throughout the world.

    With each new attack against the west, I have noticed a distinct pattern that it is generally Muslim women who post videos in an attempt to deflect the blame for terrorism away from the Muslim community. These apologists are well-rehearsed in what they have to say and call out anyone who criticizes Islam as “Islamophobic”.

    Darn right we are “Islamophobic”. We fear the emergence of an all-Muslim planet, with all that sharia law represents, which is total conformity and subjugation or death to those who will not conform. We fear that expecting Muslims to eventually become terrorists will become the “new normal”, somthins which I dread.

    I do not want to see that happen. Toward that end, I applaud all those people like Robert Spencer who are trying to educate the world about the truth behind Islam and Muslim’s bogus claims that it is a “religion of peace”. It is not a religion, nor does it want peace.

    Thank you again, Robert, for your efforts in what may soon be a winning war. Mainstream media outlets are only now beginning to see patterns of Islamic violence and tactics which you saw long ago.

    • Know Thy Enemy says

      Jan 18, 2015 at 5:02 pm

      “Darn right we are “Islamophobic”.”

      Ron, we are not “Islamophobic”. We are Islamorealists! It is unwise to play into the enemy’s hand by using their phrases and terms, phrases and terms that they deliberately created that way to fool people into supporting them!

      IslamoREALIST on the other hand is not a propaganda term. It accurately reflects who we are!

    • gordon miller says

      Jan 19, 2015 at 12:40 pm

      Yes, Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller deserve our utmost praise. Just look at what happened to Pamela’s website this weekend. We Americans have got to stand with them now more than ever.

  32. Jerry says

    Jan 19, 2015 at 12:14 pm

    They should have beheaded the paedophile who “married” Aisha when she was six, probably, at least, tried having sex with before she was nine, how many times only God knows, and then regularly “consummated the marriage” to the extent that made here unable to bear children.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Michael Copeland on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • Dude on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.