It is painfully obvious that all too many Muslims in the United Kingdom believe that Islam has nothing to do with “British identity.” They have no interest in “British identity.” They consider themselves part of the umma, the worldwide Muslim community, and that is the only earthly entity to which they owe allegiance. This has led to hundreds, maybe even over a thousand, Muslims from Britain traveling to Iraq and Syria to wage jihad for the Islamic State, and some Muslims in Britain to declare that they would eventually conquer and Islamize the Sceptered Isle as well.
In an effort to stop all this, the clueless and abject Cameron government begged imams to reinforce the sense of British identity among Muslims in Britain. But instead of cooperating, as one would expect from loyal British subjects who were just as appalled as David Cameron is at how their peaceful religion was being twisted and hijacked, “Muslim groups said the letter unfairly singled them out.”
Oh really? Well, when a thousand British Anglicans or Jews or Hindus travel overseas to join a terror group, or start calling for the conquest and subjugation of Britain, then these Muslim groups might have a point. Until then, this is just more of what we see so often from Islamic supremacists: claims that any and all counter-terror measures are “Islamophobic.” Tahla Ahmad of the Muslim Council of Britain declared: “The letter has all the hallmarks of very poor judgment which feeds into an Islamophobic narrative, which feeds into a narrative of us and them.” If all the “Islamophobic” counter-terror measures were removed, the jihad could advance unimpeded and unopposed. And that’s the objective. But Cameron, as ridiculous as ever, doesn’t see that.
Muslim groups accused the British government of copying the language of the far right on Monday and of stoking Islamophobia after ministers wrote to imams asking them to explain to Muslims how Islam is compatible with being British.
In a letter to over 1,000 imams last Friday, Eric Pickles, the minister for local government and communities, asked them to explain to Muslims how Islam can be “part of British identity”, arguing they had a duty to do more to fight extremism and root out anyone preaching hatred. Muslim groups said the letter unfairly singled them out.
“The letter has all the hallmarks of very poor judgment which feeds into an Islamophobic narrative, which feeds into a narrative of us and them,” Tahla Ahmad of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) told Sky News.
The row, which underscores tensions between the government and Muslims, comes as security forces warn an attack on Britain by Islamist militants is highly likely. Jews and Muslims say they are fearful, for different reasons, after the Charlie Hebdo shootings in Paris. Harun Khan, deputy secretary general of the MCB, said his organisation would be writing to the government to complain.
“Is Mr Pickles seriously suggesting, as do members of the far right, that Muslims and Islam are inherently apart from British society?,” said Khan. Mohammed Shafiq, chief executive of the Ramadhan Foundation, said the letter was patronising, factually incorrect, and “typical of the Government only looking at Muslims through the prism of terrorism and security.”
Britain’s 2.8 million Muslims have been mostly praised by politicians for peacefully condemning the Paris shootings, though Sajid Javid, the most senior Muslim in government, has said Muslims have “a special burden” to track down extremists.
In the letter, Pickles said imams needed to help the government do something it couldn’t achieve on its own. “You have a precious opportunity, and an important responsibility: in explaining and demonstrating how faith in Islam can be part of British identity,” the letter read.
“We must show our young people, who may be targeted, that extremists have nothing to offer them … show them these men of hate have no place in our mosques or any place of worship.” Prime Minister David Cameron defended the letter, saying he agreed with its message. “Anyone frankly reading this letter who has a problem with it, I think really has a problem,” he said. “I think it’s the most reasonable, sensible, moderate letter that Eric could possibly have written.”