• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Video: Robert Spencer on Hannity, January 8, 2015 on Muslim areas in France and the Charlie Hebdo jihadists

Jan 9, 2015 12:51 pm By Robert Spencer

Last night on Fox.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, France, Islamic supremacism, Robert Spencer, Sharia Tagged With: Charlie Hebdo, No-Go Zones


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. katnis says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 1:13 pm

    Congratulations on your appearance on Fox. This is a great discussion and is worth sharing. 751 enclaves, or “neighborhoods,” in France! 751 enclaves that do not abide by french law, but have been given the right to vote.

    Today France is burdened by 4.7M muslims, 7.5% of the french population. What will happen when the population hits 10%?

    This is a recipe for disaster!

    Is the US going to take a hint? I see an ugly future creeping up on our national security.

    • Beagle says

      Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 pm

      The US is letting in thousands more “refugees” from Syria. So no. No it’s not taking a hint. The Somali experiment is going so well. We can’t self immolate and Balkanize soon enough for our political leaders.

      • john spielman says

        Jan 9, 2015 at 4:07 pm

        the ONLY refugees fro Syria Iraq etc that should be allowed into the WEST is the Christians and atheists. Sunni can go to Saudi Arabia and Shia to Iran

        • SpiritOf1683 says

          Jan 9, 2015 at 5:02 pm

          And the few remaining Jews there. Of course, for them, Europe is a no-go area, so North America, Australia, New Zealand or Israel it is for them.

        • JOHN SPIELMAN says

          Jan 9, 2015 at 5:18 pm

          Spirirtof1683; absolutely- God bless ISRAEL!

    • Ann Harris says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 9:13 pm

      France has only itself to blame for the influx of far too many Muslims. That’s what a Country gets with a Liberal government.
      Don’t expect Obama to do anything. He’s pro Islam. He’s pro Communism. U.S. needs to hope they can ride out the next 2 yrs with as little damage as possible.

  2. Salah says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 1:42 pm

    Breaking News:

    Hostage situation in a jewellery store in Montpellier, France – reports

    http://rt.com/news/221255-montpellier-jewelery-hostage-france/

  3. Carl Arasi says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 1:47 pm

    No go zone? Really! How do these European countries allow these misfits of humanity to come into their country, and allow them to confiscate the sovereignty of their soil, and keep out that country’s sovereignty and law? These countries like France, England and Sweden, should bring in their military’s and. Lite these people up like a Christmas tree! Let these Muslim scum try that no go zone in the US, and I know they will eventually, but that will be the end of them in this country! No country on this planet. Other than Muslim countries should allow this disease to enter!

    • Beagle says

      Jan 9, 2015 at 2:01 pm

      How?

      Search: “Eurabia and Bat Ye’or” for a detailed history. JW archives is a good place to start.

      • voegelinian says

        Jan 9, 2015 at 5:32 pm

        A good summary:

        http://www.meforum.org/1288/eurabia-the-euro-arab-axis

    • Libyan Jihad says

      Jan 9, 2015 at 2:22 pm

      “No country on this planet. Other than Muslim countries should allow this disease to enter!”

      They try so hard to keep us out, but we always manage to find a way through with the help of Allah, the French thought they stopped Islam at the battle of Tours, a little more than a 1000 years later we are swarming their country.

      • Salah says

        Jan 9, 2015 at 3:04 pm

        It doesn’t really matter, we are striking at the heart of Islam, we are destroying it by destroying the character of its founder: Muhammad, the lowest of the low.
        And we are winning. There is NOTHING you can do about it except murdering a few unarmed men and women here and there. Muslims are leaving Islam in the millions because of this…

        http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/12/perfect-man-of-islam.html

        • kajestro says

          Jan 9, 2015 at 5:27 pm

          Not correct sir.
          You are not destroying Mohammeds charackter
          as Mohammeds charackter was destroyed by himself.

          You are simply exposing mohammeds charackter.

          Destruction is usually a violent thing= no good.

          Truth is a good thing and you are simply telling the truth.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 9, 2015 at 11:28 pm

        The repulsive Libyan Jihad wrote:

        They try so hard to keep us out, but we always manage to find a way through with the help of Allah, the French thought they stopped Islam at the battle of Tours, a little more than a 1000 years later we are swarming their country.
        ………………………………

        The other day the vile Libyan Jihad was crowing over his coreligionists slaughtering American diplomats in Benghazi, and claiming that if the West tried to send any more diplomats to any part of Dar-al-Islam that they would be similarly butchered.

        Now he is crowing over violent Muslim invasion of the free West.

        But this is, of course, all of a piece—he objects to Western diplomats because they are to be treated as *equals*—and no Muslim considers the “filthy Kuffar” to be fit for anything other than their slaves.

        And that is exactly what pious Muslims are trying to do in France—butchering any who dare point out the threat of Islam and warn their fellow Infidels, like the staff of Charlie Hebdo; and any police or security who might protect Infidels; and any Jews, because Muslims have always been homicidally antisemitic.

        This is utterly appalling—but is a very instructive glimpse into the mindset of a Jihadist.

      • Champ says

        Jan 9, 2015 at 11:51 pm

        “Libyan Jihad” is proud of being so evil ..typical mohammedan slave.

      • greyhoundfancier says

        Jan 9, 2015 at 11:59 pm

        You, Islam, so proud of your connection with destruction. Your God is a God of death, Baal come back. You throw your children into the furnace gladly.

        God (the real God) is Love. The creative force in the universe is love. Islam is division, hatred, and death.

        Islam is of the Deceiver, the Enemy of all that is good and decent. Christians, you may face some critical and heartbreaking decisions because of the Islamic death cult. Let’s pray for strength to know and do what is right to oppose the forces of death.

    • Frank Castle says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 5:04 am

      What about Dearborn, Michigan?

      You have mozlems festering within the USA, protected by the whitehouse socialist ‘0’.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 9:51 pm

        You’re right—there isn’t a nation in the West that is free from violent, “restive” Muslim infiltration. We are all headed down this same suicidal path—but some countries are much further along than others. France is now approaching a 10% Muslim population, with the mushrooming Muslim violence to prove it.

      • Ann Harris says

        Jan 11, 2015 at 6:58 pm

        The Islamist goal is to establish a ‘caliphate’ which is what ISIS is doing. They intend to do this world wide. They have spread there followers in pretty much every country on earth. Like cockroaches, they infiltrate and breed like rabbits. I doubt they have heard of birth control.
        The leader of ISIS is the ‘Caliph’. The only hope the west has of pushing them back is the leaders of the western nations. Unfortunately, so far, our leaders have welcomed them en masse to our countries and then expected us, the citizens of the western nations, to welcome them with open arms. We are also expected to be excessively tolerant or we are labelled racist or Islamophobic. Being kind and decent people, we allowed our leaders to sell us a bill of goods in the interest of multiculturalism. Because of Muslims, multiculturalism is a huge failure. Until this despicable race came to western countries, all previous immigrants, over the years, have caused no or minimal problems with assimilation. Italians, Chinese, Japanese, Russians, Spanish, Mexicans and on and on.
        We need to ask why it is that Muslims create havoc wherever they go. It’s not their intention to assimilate to their new country. On the contrary, they have every intention to have us assimilate to their religion. Bit by bit they chip away at our way of life trying to have our laws reflect their beliefs such as the segregation of men and women, taking advantage of our human rights tribunals.
        In England, the British leaders have allowed Sharia law to be used by Muslims for divorces, probation of wills, most family laws. What comes next?
        Along with France, Sweden have ‘no go’ zones where the communities are solely inhabited by Muslims. Police, Ambulance, fire and all services will not go into those areas out of fear. What kind of leaders do we have that would allow this?
        One of the biggest issues we have in dealing with Muslims is the belief that so-called ‘moderate’ Muslims don’t follow the evil doings of the terrorists. However, all Muslims live by the Quran. Completely and totally. They are fanatically loyal to their religion. So, if westerners continue to think it’s only a few radicals we need to deal with, that is the biggest danger. In the Quran, it is said that Muslims must be honest, however it is also said that a Muslim can lie and deceive in the interest of protecting the faith. That is why we should NEVER believe any Muslim and especially Imams, leaders of the mosques. They will and do brazenly lie when questioned about their faith and teachings. Any non Muslim who claims to have Muslim friends who are great, wonderful people should remember that every Muslim considers you to be an infidel, an apostate, a kaffir, all of which are beneath Muslims. They may not join in the behaviours of radical Muslims but they DO stand with them.

  4. Beagle says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 1:58 pm

    Hard to focus with all the jihadi trolls here today. Very well done last night, RS. I luckily stumbled into Hannity last night.

    You and Mark Steyn made that the best Hannity I have seen. I like Walid Phares as well.

  5. Dracula says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 1:58 pm

    The residents of these enclaves do not suffer from a lack of opportunity or resources to assimilate. They exhibit a deliberate hostility towards integration and take great pains to shun the customs and values of their new neighbors. These are the actions not of immigrants, but occupiers.

    • voegelinian says

      Jan 9, 2015 at 5:35 pm

      Yes; anticipatory occupiers. And they are assisted by two wings of their co-religionists — the violent front-line soldiers; and the seemingly harmless stealth jihadists who pretend to assimilate (and who fool the Western mainstream, including even many in the Counter-Jihad).

  6. Don McKellar says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 2:19 pm

    Every time Robert Spencer appears on TV, finally getting to make at least a few soundbytes of truth based on facts with regards to Islam, the world’s future gets a little tiny bit brighter.

  7. wildjew says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 2:26 pm

    I heard Hannity invoke Spencer on his radio program yesterday afternoon — I cannot remember what it was in reference to, maybe these “no-go zones.” I am glad he had him on his television program again. Spencer should be a regular on Fox. Many / most of their experts on Islam are disappointing.

  8. Ross says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 2:27 pm

    Considering that the French government knew one or more of these pigs was trained by Al Qaeda, I hope the survivors sue the shit out of the French government for allowing them to exist in their country.

    We will have to do the same in the US because they are here, they have acreages with training facilities and their dead are buried within the compound rather than a coroner being allowed in. This was reported by one of the media such as Frontline or 60 Minutes. (Sorry, I don’t remember the source.)

    The French need to go in and clean out the no-go areas and they should imprison anyone coming back from Jihad in other countries. Anyone they find in their country who has declared themselves to be at war with the West should be given a helicopter ride out over the ocean.

    It is time to clean up the mess that the PC politicians have allowed to matastacize.

    • greyhoundfancier says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 12:02 am

      Could Devil’s Island be re-opened?

      • Western Canadian says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 1:03 pm

        Actually, it relocated and expanded to most of the middle east…… and is currently being run my muslims….

  9. Bezelel says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 2:36 pm

    The no go zones explain the automatic weapons. Where guns are outlawed only the outlaws have guns. The muslims living in no go zones are actually out-laws. Now you have a defenseless native population hosting 4 million armed outlaws. We have just seen how many police it took to handle 4 individuals. I don’t relish the thought of the citizens walking around packing firearms but then, even I know if you are going to invite hostiles to among you, there will be trouble. Unarmed police? Unarmed civilians? Heavily armed muslims? How hard is it to see the future?

    • Bezelel says

      Jan 9, 2015 at 2:38 pm

      (edit) Live among you

    • Oliver says

      Jan 9, 2015 at 8:07 pm

      I am very worried about what’s going on in France, but please don’t exaggerate – there are not “4 million armed outlaws”. Many Muslims in France go about their lives perfectly peacefully and have moderate views. And I don’t know what Robert means by 751 “no-go areas”, I’d like to see a link to the source he refers to. It’s true there are some Muslim-majority suburbs of cities with a reputation for not being very safe, but they aren’t literally known as “no-go areas” and there are no official sharia courts there as far as I know – perhaps they might set up informal ones – and certainly even in those areas I highly doubt anything more than a small percentage have guns, and of those a smaller percentage would be fanatics willing to use them on people . Gun ownership is not a big thing at all in France.

      • gravenimage says

        Jan 9, 2015 at 11:56 pm

        Oliver wrote:

        Many Muslims in France go about their lives perfectly peacefully and have moderate views.
        ……………………………

        I’m sorry, but are you serious? 42% of young Muslims in France openly say that suicide bombings are justified.

        78% of Muslims in neighboring Britain believe that the Danish MoToon cartoonists should be punished. 40% of Muslims there want to see Shari’ah law.

        So how many is “many”? Sounds like a large percentage of Muslims in Europe support just this sort of savagery.

        More:

        And I don’t know what Robert means by 751 “no-go areas”, I’d like to see a link to the source he refers to.
        ……………………………

        This has been determined by French authorities themselves, who designate them as “Zones Urbaines Sensibles” (Sensitive Urban Zones):

        http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3305/france-no-go-zones

        • Olive says

          Jan 10, 2015 at 5:38 am

          Zones urbaines sensibles just refers to urban areas recognised as having social problems, it doesn’t automatically translate as ‘Radical Muslim ghetto run under sharia and where non-Muslims can’t go’

        • gravenimage says

          Jan 10, 2015 at 10:16 pm

          The ZUS are *heavily* Muslim, and this is where most of their problems stem from; just because French authorities use euphemisms does not mean that we have to.

          http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2006/11/the-751-no-go-zones-of-france

          While Muslims make up about 8% of the French population, they account for an astonishing 60-70% of felons in French prisons, including many of the most violent offenders.

      • Bezelel says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 10:34 am

        @Oliver,The US has virtual no go zones as well. Entire apartment complexes where cartel have lookouts with cell phones at all entrances and tenants who are complicit or to afraid to complain about the drugs and weapons. The police know about it but until a problem gets big enough, they do nothing. What better way for the muslims to smuggle in an arsenal than no-go zones? Look at what is going on in Gaza. Yes there is a comparison.

  10. PRCS says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 2:40 pm

    The problem with people like Hannity is his failure to listen and comprehend.

    If all three of those guests had appeared with signs that stated “It’s Orthodox Islam, NOT radical Islam” he would continue to parrot idiotic phrases like ‘radical Islamic jihadists’.

    Nonetheless, his viewers WERE exposed to the Qur’an’s written supremacism (i.e. Muslims=best of people; unbelievers=vilest of created beings).

    I hope at least a few took notice.

    • voegelinian says

      Jan 9, 2015 at 5:37 pm

      Indeed; Hannity’s asymptotic reflexes are highly annoying and offensive.

  11. wildjew says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 2:50 pm

    Please scroll to approx. 4 minutes 20 seconds into this video when Hannity asks (Fox News preeminent expert on Islam) Walid Phares: “Do we need to examine the values of these people and ascertain those values before they come here…..”

    I cannot say Phares gave Hannity of his viewers a satisfactory answer.

    • Beagle says

      Jan 9, 2015 at 3:15 pm

      There is no vetting. It’s a joke. The US lets in jihadis who claim religious persecution in Muslim countries. Saudi Arabia, a font of jihad, does better counterterrorism than the US.

      The US has outsourced most vetting of refugees to the UN.

      Even trying to do worse might not be possible.

      • wildjew says

        Jan 9, 2015 at 4:43 pm

        Fox News does not have good experts on Islam. Walid Phares and others leave me with an empty feeling. Andrew McCarthy is a great lawyer but he isn’t an expert on Islam. It’s too bad Spencer isn’t a regular on Fox. Maybe Fox viewers would learn something about Islam if he were.

        • voegelinian says

          Jan 9, 2015 at 5:43 pm

          Sometimes (if not most of the time) it takes an ordinary civilian in the Counter-Jihad to spit out the painfully reasonable common sense that our illustrious leaders keep eggshell-tiptoeing around.

          I don’t know who the Jihad Watch reader “out of context” was or is (I don’t recall seeing them lately), but they hit the nail on the head when commenting on a round-table with four Illustrious Counter-Jihad Spokesmen (Robert Spencer, the glaringly asymptotic Andrew McCarthy, as well as Bosch Fastwin and Baroness Cox) who continue to seem to be afflicted with Can’t-Condemn-Islam-and-Muslim-without-Hemming-and-Hawing Syndrome

          http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/11/spencer-mccarthy-fawstin-at-restoration-weekend-2011-what-about-moderate-muslims/comment-page-0#comment-837795

        • voegelinian says

          Jan 9, 2015 at 5:47 pm

          P.S.: Supplemented by another fine Jihad Watch commenter (who also, unfortunately, has been rather scarce of late), Infidel Pride:

          http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/11/spencer-mccarthy-fawstin-at-restoration-weekend-2011-what-about-moderate-muslims/comment-page-0#comment-838073

        • gea says

          Jan 10, 2015 at 8:39 am

          Read an abbreviated summary of Koran and Hadith and the history of Islam and Mohamed (www.cspipbllishing.com/pdfs/ATwoHourKoran.pdf). Unlike other religions, Islam ITSELF is not compatible with the US Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and has no place in any country that respects liberty, justice and human rights of INDIVIDUALS. Islam DEMANDS SUBMISSION to the hateful to all nopn-Muslims teachings of Mohamed, who was a pedophile, polygamist, rapist, misogynist, looter and mass murderer who in any decent and sane society would be convicted for his crimes against humanity and not emulated by 1,640 millions of Muslims worldwide as “the most perfect human being who ever lived, and their “beloved prophet”

          Such a criminal role model results in criminal followers such as those terrorists in France and all over Western countries which had allowed this scourge of Islam into its midst because of the politically correct cultural relativism. Unlike other major religions, Islam ITSELF is not compatible with US and EC constitutions and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and Muslims and their apologists have to completely REFORM it by tossing out 65% of hateful verses of Koran and also tossing out the criminal Mohamed, whom NOBODY should emulate.

  12. Walter Sieruk says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 3:10 pm

    As for the murderous Islamic terrorists who committed those heinous jihad shooting in Paris, France there are some people who might ask “How could the terrorists be so very brutal,vicious, ruthless to go into that building and murder all those unarmed and helpless people ?” The answer to this question is found in the Bible. For the Bible teaches that there are some people who a malice-filled, heartless,deadly and of such a low and terrible character because have had “their conscience seared with a hot iron.” First Timothy 4:2. [K.J.V.] The “hot iron” is this case is Islam.

  13. jewdog says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 7:03 pm

    Robert made the clearest distinction of all the respondants questioned, because he got straight to the point: Islamic Law demands the death penalty for blasphemers who insult the Prophet. I should add as an aside that that penalty, once guilt is established, can be carried out by any Muslim.
    Let’s not overcomplicate the issue. The motivation for the crime is simple. I just wish our leaders had the understanding and the courage to say it.

    • jewdog says

      Jan 9, 2015 at 9:06 pm

      I just want to add that the only other interviewee who approached Robert in clarity was Anjem Choudary, an imam who is an unabashed proponent of the same Islamic tenets that he and Robert describe.

  14. Tommo says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 7:13 pm

    The BBC have gone into overdrive today trying to separate Islam from the killings in France. It would seem that a policy decision was taken today by BBC News after the appalling facts were beginning to show strong Islamic association with terrorism. On every news programme a steady stream of Muslims from both France and the UK have appeared on TV to repeat the lie about Islam’s peacefulness and how they are against killing others and say their religion has been hi-jacked by mad people who are not Muslims. The BBC news machine has been relentless in its damage limitation propaganda protecting the very source of terror – Islam itself. It’s sickening to watch it.

    • Oliver says

      Jan 9, 2015 at 7:57 pm

      I’m in France, and have not followed what the BBC has said all that much, but I can well believe it. It seems this is the standard line of a lot of western media these days. I don’t know how long people can go on putting their heads in the sand over this. It was just the same back in the days of 9./11 – moderate Muslims were quoted saying it’s a religion of peace that has been distorted by fanatics etc. These days when we are all on the net and can easily research Islam, it seems dishonest. I guess they are desperate to avoid any reprisals against moderate integrated Muslims or people who just happen to look North African or Middle Eastern etc, and I can see where they’re coming from, but it’s still not honest or helpful, it seems to me, because it means there’s an elephant in the room about the fact that the Islamic texts contain plenty that would incite towards this kind of thing. I don’t know what the answer to that problem is, but it’s not going to come from just ignoring it.

      • Frank Castle says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 5:34 am

        It is easy to distinguish between the less dangerous (stealth Moslem) and the wannabe martyr.

        Look at how they dress!!
        the wannabe sports a beard and his whores cover themselves in garbage bags. DON’T FORGET the zabiba, ‘the mark of the beast’.

        Start with the imamis, and the wannabe; the cowardice of the rest will encourage better behaviour, but don’t be fooled(less dangerous is still a problem).

  15. Oliver says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 7:51 pm

    I am a British person living in France. I felt irritated in the last few days as I noticed a lot of people posting on social media to say the Charlie Hebdo attacks had “nothing to do with religion/Islam”, and then when this was repeated again by President Hollande. I posted on Facebook to point out that Sharia calls for death of people who insult the prophet, and while insult may not have been intended as such by Charlie Hebdo (which makes fun of all faiths and leaders in a robust and cheeky way), you could see how fanatics without a sense of humour might have taken it that way. I linked to Islamqa.com on which a salafi scholar details in depth how insulters must be killed, and I was shocked to find on Alexa it is the world’s most visited site on the Islamic faith, which seemed to me evidence that an extremist interpretation of Islam may be more widespread than I thought. I am glad to hear Robert also stating that on this news show.

    Having said that, Robert’s comments seemed to me to overplay the situation in France. I know that there are parts of the suburbs of large cities where the population comprises a large amount of Muslims and which can have a bad reputation for security, but I don’t know where this “751” comes from and furthermore I am pretty sure I never heard of the French Republic, which prides itself on secularism, allowing Sharia courts. I guess Robert means that informal ones are set up in some of these communities, operating in a clandestine way. Also, he does not acknowledge the fact that it is far from true that all Muslims in France live segregated in Muslim dominated areas, and it seems to me that there are also plenty of French Muslims who are well integrated in French society and who profess to hate violence and respect the values of the Republic. He seems to imply they are all fanatical, which surely can’t be true.

    I’d add, that an ex-Muslim friend – but Iranian-American, not French – who was formerly very religious, tells me that in his opinion most Muslims are just ignorant of the more unpleasant aspects of the faith, due to not reading the Koran – or at least reciting bits of it in Arabic, which 90% of the world’s Muslims don’t speak, and not even properly understanding the prayers they say, also in Arabic. Nor do they read the Hadiths and Sira or commentaries – basically they don’t know well all the violent things Mohammed did and said. And he said that of those more seriously religious Muslims who do know the faith well, some are good people, attracted to the more genuinely spiritual and beautiful aspects of the faith and who ignore the other aspects – and then some are varying degrees of fanatic, but may hide this from non-Muslims. So, it seems to me a little scare-mongering to imply that all of the 4.5 million French Mulsims are radicals calling for Sharia in France. I don’t think it is useful to exaggerate; what is needed in these times when there is a lot of ignorance and also a lot of denial of reality – is just objective facts.

    • Mirren10 says

      Jan 9, 2015 at 11:01 pm

      *What * ‘genuinely spiritual and beautiful aspects of the faith’ ?

      Do give some examples …

      • greyhoundfancier says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 12:14 am

        The non-violent parts of Islam contain awkwardly worded mishmashes of confused exegesis of parts of the Old Testament, mixing up well-known Biblical figures, e.g. Mariam and Mary, some pretty serious heresy, e.g. Jesus’ “death” was staged and He didn’t die when crucified.No beauty or spirituality there – just a mess.

        What need for a “prophet” after the resurrection of the Christ? Why would anyone who knows Jesus find Mohammad attractive in the least?

        • Oliver says

          Jan 11, 2015 at 6:55 am

          I don’t “know” Jesus, I’m agnostic (having spent many years as a Christian, becoming disillusioned with it and then exploring other faiths), and I regret the fact that this site, while doing good work in pointing out real dangers of Islamic extremism, also seems to have an agenda of wanting to bring back more dominance of Christianity (and possibly Judaism). What we need is secular societies where no religions are favoured by the laws or state, and religion is considered something for someone’s private beliefs and conscience, not more religion. That just causes divisions. The Charlie Hebdo cartoonists were mostly very secular and made fun of all religions which make claims to having THE truth and being more moral than other people, when their practioners often spectactuarly fail at the latter and sometimes (especially the more fundementalist people) hold back new discoveries because their minds are too closed. I’m not opposed to religion as such, but I strongly feel that we have the right to criticise all religions if we want, like any other ideology, philosophy, political viewpoint etc.

        • Mirren10 says

          Jan 11, 2015 at 7:41 am

          ”I regret the fact that this site, while doing good work in pointing out real dangers of Islamic extremism, also seems to have an agenda of wanting to bring back more dominance of Christianity (and possibly Judaism).

          Crap. There is no agenda here, except that of reporting on jihad, both stealth and violent. Many, many atheists, agnostics, and gays post here, and I myself am agnostic.

          You are trying to dilute the importance and popularity of Jihad Watch, by imputing it has a Christian ‘possibly Judaism’ agenda, and that is *not* the case.

          . ”What we need is secular societies where no religions are favoured by the laws or state, and religion is considered something for someone’s private beliefs and conscience, not more religion.”

          And that is exactly what we have in the West. However, in mohammedan majority countries, it is **sharia** which is the law of the land, and sharia dictates that islam is the state.

          ” The Charlie Hebdo cartoonists were mostly very secular and made fun of all religions which make claims to having THE truth and being more moral than other people, when their practioners often spectactuarly fail at the latter and sometimes (especially the more fundementalist people) hold back new discoveries because their minds are too closed. ”

          This is just incoherent drivel. Are you attempting to imply that Christianity, or Judaism, or any other religion, is no different from islam ?

          How strange, then, that the **only** religion to murder, torture, rape and destroy, is islam. The Islamic murderers of the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists, were mohammedans, who shrieked ‘allahu akbar’, and said they did it to ”avenge mohammed”.

          In my opinion, you’re either a leftard useful idiot, or a malignant troll. Piss off.

        • Oliver says

          Jan 11, 2015 at 8:11 am

          If I was a “leftard” I wouldn’t visit Jihad Watch or say positive things about it. The “Je suis Charlie” campaign is about free speech and now you seem to want me censor me saying a few mildly critical things about my impression of this site. I was implying Christianity or Judaism are just as bad, just saying I don’t think the answer to Islamic extremism is some kind of Crusade where we try to hold up Christianity (or Judaism) as the answer. People can be good without god.

        • Mirren10 says

          Jan 11, 2015 at 8:44 am

          ”The “Je suis Charlie” campaign is about free speech and now you seem to want me censor me saying a few mildly critical things about my impression of this site”

          More leftard claptrap. No-one is ‘censoring’ you, you are free to spew whatever incoherent drivel you wish. However, when you do so, people will take issue with your nonsense, and point out your logic fallacies, and your attempts to lie about what has been said, what is in the Old Testament, etc. That isn’t censoring, it is argument.

      • Oliver says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 9:04 am

        Well you can look at the “Good stuff” section of skeptics annotated Koran, for some of the positive things Mo said, though unfortunately most of the time when he said to do something good he meant do it for other Muslims.

        Also, if you pare it to its basics and you believe in one god and that Mohammed was his prophet and you just pray and give alms and visit Mecca etc, I can see if you are that way inclined it can give spiritual solace to people like other religions can. I’m told also that there are aspects, like Sufism, that are satisfying to people interested in the more mystical aspects of religion (feeling of closeness to God etc).

        • Mirren10 says

          Jan 11, 2015 at 7:17 am

          “Good stuff” section of skeptics annotated Koran, for some of the positive things Mo said, though unfortunately most of the time when he said to do something good he meant do it for other Muslims”

          Not ‘most of the time’, **all** of the time. There is no Golden Rule in islam.

          ”Also, if you pare it to its basics and you believe in one god and that Mohammed was his prophet and you just pray and give alms and visit Mecca etc, I can see if you are that way inclined it can give spiritual solace to people like other religions can”

          ‘Other religions’ don’t pray for the destruction and death of those who disbelieve.

          ”I’m told also that there are aspects, like Sufism, that are satisfying to people interested in the more mystical aspects of religion (feeling of closeness to God etc”

          Told by whom ? muslims ? ‘Sufism’ is no different from shiite, sunni, or any other sect of islam. **All** want to see islam triumphant, and all non-muslims either submit to islam, pay the jizya, or die. Ahamadiyas also want this, the only difference is they are not prepared to advance the sharia by force.

      • Oliver says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 9:06 am

        A local Muslim, objecting to a facebook comment I made, has also just told me I should go and listen to the preaching at the local mosque, which she said is beautiful and would impress me, and that I would be welcome to go despite not being Muslim

        • Mirren10 says

          Jan 11, 2015 at 7:18 am

          ”I should go and listen to the preaching at the local mosque, which she said is beautiful and would impress me, and that I would be welcome to go despite not being Muslim”

          Well, they’re waiting for you …

      • Olliver says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 9:08 am

        She also insisted that French Muslims think it is part of their religion to respect the laws of the country you live in. Now, I’m sure that doesn’t apply to all of them, but I have no particular reason to assume she’s not sincere in saying that

        • Mirren10 says

          Jan 11, 2015 at 7:28 am

          ”She also insisted that French Muslims think it is part of their religion to respect the laws of the country you live in.”

          If you really believe this, does it ever occur to you to wonder why there are so many mohammedan enclaves in France, where sharia is practiced, in defiance of French law ?

          Does it occur to you to wonder why, **every year**, mohammedans in the banlieus come out rioting and burning cars, and police and fire services are stoned and attacked ? Does it occur to you to wonder why, when it is **against French law**, so many mohammedan women continue to wear the face mask, in **defiance** of that law ?

          You are either dangerously naïve and gullible, or you are trolling. If it’s the first, I suggest, instead of listening to some taqqiya spewing muslims, you actually read the koran. Reading Islam 101, at the top of this page, and Blogging the Koran, are good places to start.

      • Bezelel says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 10:38 am

        @Mirren, Even mein kamph has some very lovely ideals in it. Very lovely IF you’re a nazi.

        • Darren says

          Jan 10, 2015 at 1:49 pm

          ab·ro·gate
          verb \ˈa-brə-ˌgāt\

          : To end or cancel (something) in a formal and official way.

          Abrogation makes null and void any supposed peaceful verses.

        • Mirren10 says

          Jan 11, 2015 at 7:08 am

          ”Even mein kamph has some very lovely ideals in it. Very lovely IF you’re a nazi”

          Exactly, Bezelel !

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 11:00 pm

      Oliver wrote:

      …most Muslims are just ignorant of the more unpleasant aspects of the faith…basically they don’t know well all the violent things Mohammed did and said…
      …………………….

      Oh, good grief. I suppose this explains the burgeoning Jihad being waged all over the world—24,826 violent Jihad attacks just since 9/11.

      And then you have pedophilia, “Honor Killings”, and murder of “blasphemers” and apostates.

      It seems that *all too many* Muslims know *just* what their vicious creed teaches.

      More:

      And he said that of those more seriously religious Muslims who do know the faith well, some are good people, attracted to the more genuinely spiritual and beautiful aspects of the faith…
      …………………….

      Glad to see you regard this vicious, oppressive, and genocidal creed as having “spiritual and beautiful” aspects. I’m sure Fascism is lovely in parts as well…sarc/off

      More:

      So, it seems to me a little scare-mongering to imply that all of the 4.5 million French Mulsims are radicals calling for Sharia in France. I don’t think it is useful to exaggerate; what is needed in these times when there is a lot of ignorance and also a lot of denial of reality – is just objective facts.
      …………………….

      There are no polls for France, and France does no collect statistics by religious affiliation. But in neighboring Britain *40%* of Muslims there want to see Shari’ah law. 46% of Muslims in neighboring Germany want to see it become a Muslim country in the near future.

      There is no reason to believe that the situation in France is much better—indeed, with a larger percentage of Muslims in France, it may be worse.

      So are you sanguine about between a third and a half of Muslims in France holding these views? And if not, then why would you consider it “scare mongering” to mention it?

      Here’s more on the disturbing Islamization of France:

      http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4120/islamization-france

      • Oliver says

        Jan 11, 2015 at 6:45 am

        Even if 40% of French Muslims wanted Sharia it’s likely only a tiny percentage of those would be willing to pick up a gun and kill someone over it. So to suggest att 4.5 million are potential Charlie Hebdo killers, presumbly including the small children, is over the top. And even if there were a lot of extremists, that doesn’t mean that well-meaning Muslims who follow it as their culture and say their prayers etc without hating the west – or even who don’t say prayers at all and are purely “cultural Muslims” – don’t exist as well. So there’s no point demonising all Muslims. And I don’t see how we, who are not from that culture, can know if it can involved genuinely beautiful and spiritually uplifting experiences. I expect if you belong to a mosque led by someone who does preach love and is not fundamentalist, it can be, or, even just in chanting prayers (in a language you may not even know), some people find that a peaceful and calming activity. And apparently Sufi practices enable some people to have satisfying feelings of oneness with God. I’m just trying to see the big picture and not be an anti-Muslim “extremist”. At the same time I totally agree with this site’s efforts to point out the real dangers of Islamic fundamentalists and the reality of some of the stuff that is taught in the texts. Having said which, have you looked at the Old Testament recently? It’s worse than Sharia, but Christians and Jews rejected the worst aspects some 2000 years ago, so maybe Islam can also evolve to admit those verses are there but that they’re no longer going to follow them or consider them relevant today. It seems to me from talking to moderate Muslims that many of them already do that; what’s needed is for more actual leaders/scholars to come up with some framework for that. The big problems are the idea of Mohammed being perfect, and the Koran being infallible. But maybe that can change, I know it won’t be simple, but maybe. Again, Jews revere Moses, who did things just as bad as Mohammed, but they don’t aim to copy them today.

        • Mirren10 says

          Jan 11, 2015 at 8:34 am

          ”Even if 40% of French Muslims wanted Sharia it’s likely only a tiny percentage of those would be willing to pick up a gun and kill someone over it.”

          Violent jihad is only one aspect of advancing islam. Stealth jihad, by which muslims infiltrate into government, law enforcement, and the armed forces, and push sharia compliance, is another. Lawfare jihad attempts to give muslims special privileges which other people do not have, and to bend the law in favour of muslims. For both violent, and stealth jihad, the desired end result is the same; the subjugation of everyone under islam.

          I take it you’re willing to risk your life, and that of your loved ones, over ‘only a tiny percentage’ ? You must be one of those multiculti PC idiots who believes it’s better to be murdered than ‘damage diversity’ ?

          So to suggest att 4.5 million are potential Charlie Hebdo killers, presumbly including the small children, is over the top.”

          Nobody has suggested any such thing. This is a typical leftard tactic, introducing a strawman argument. You should be aware that the majority of commenters here are very islamo-savvy, leftard savvy, and well versed in debating techniques, and can spot logic fallacies a mile off. You’re out of your league.

          ”And even if there were a lot of extremists, that doesn’t mean that well-meaning Muslims who follow it as their culture and say their prayers etc without hating the west – or even who don’t say prayers at all and are purely “cultural Muslims” – don’t exist as well. So there’s no point demonising all Muslims”

          These ‘well meaning muslims’ you speak of, are well meaning in defiance of their religion, not because of it. And if they’re so well meaning, why aren’t they out, in their **thousands**, marching in protest against those who murder and justify it by quoting the koran ?

          ”So there’s no point demonising all Muslims”

          Again, a strawman.

          Mr Spencer certainly doesn’t do so, nor do many on this forum. However, any muslim has the potential to become more pious, and therefore murderous. There have been many instances of so-called ‘moderate’ muslims suddenly becoming more ‘religious’, and consequently deciding to murder some infidels.

          Funnily enough, back sliding Christians, Sikhs, Hindus, Buddhists who decide to follow their religions more closely, don’t interpret that as murdering those who disbelieve, neither do they infest the institutions of the society in which they live, and attempt to make everyone subscribe to their religion’s tenets.

          Do you think that might be because there is a **fundamental difference** between the tenets of islam, and thise of any other faith ? And what, do you think, is the **fundamental difference** ? No, forget that, you’re clearly a stranger to logical thought.

          .”And I don’t see how we, who are not from that culture, can know if it can involved genuinely beautiful and spiritually uplifting experiences. I expect if you belong to a mosque led by someone who does preach love and is not fundamentalist, it can be, or, even just in chanting prayers (in a language you may not even know), some people find that a peaceful and calming activity. And apparently Sufi practices enable some people to have satisfying feelings of oneness with God. ”

          This is just PC/MC claptrap. One doesn’t have to be ‘from that culture’ in order to read the koran, hadith, and sira, and know that islam is violent, cruel, and teaches that non-muslims are the ”worst of people”, and that women are nothing more than commodities. Neither does one have to be ‘from that culture’, to know that in any majority mohammedan country that practices sharia, it is *everywhere* the same. Death for apostasy, stoning, lashing, amputations, imprisonment and death for ‘blasphemy’.

          ”At the same time I totally agree with this site’s efforts to point out the real dangers of Islamic fundamentalists and the reality of some of the stuff that is taught in the texts. Having said which, have you looked at the Old Testament recently? It’s worse than Sharia, but Christians and Jews rejected the worst aspects some 2000 years ago, so maybe Islam can also evolve to admit those verses are there but that they’re no longer going to follow them or consider them relevant today.”

          You are either totally naïve and ignorant, or you think we are. ”Having said which, have you looked at the Old Testament recently? It’s worse than Sharia, ” This is typical leftard, muslim apologist fare, and another logic fallacy, in this case, tu quoque. I’m surprised you are stupid enough to bring it up. You need to go back to dawa school.

          The Old Testament is primarily historical, and contains no open ended instructions for either Jews or Christians, to carry out its tenets. The New Testament enjoins the Golden Rule, for *all** people.

          On the other hand, the koran, if one is a pious muslim, is, quite literally, the actual word of ‘allah’, for **all time**, and cannot be either changed or ignored. To do so would be blasphemy, punishable by death. And the actual word of ‘allah’, is to hate and kill the unbelievers, murder those who apostasise, etc. Which is why there are so few muslim ‘reformers’, and those who have attempted to suggest ignoring, or changing the commands of the koran have been threatened with murder, murdered, imprisoned, and subjected to harassment, at its mildest.

          ” … maybe Islam can also evolve to admit those verses are there but that they’re no longer going to follow them or consider them relevant today. It seems to me from talking to moderate Muslims that many of them already do that; what’s needed is for more actual leaders/scholars to come up with some framework for that”

          See my above paragraph…

          ”The big problems are the idea of Mohammed being perfect, and the Koran being infallible. But maybe that can change, I know it won’t be simple, but maybe.”

          It hasn’t changed in 1400 years, and there are very few muslims, of any standing, who wish to change it. Those who do, have, as I’ve already pointed out, been murdered, imprisoned, threatened, and shunned.

          ”Again, Jews revere Moses, who did things just as bad as Mohammed, but they don’t aim to copy them today”

          Because the Old Testament doesn’t order them to do so.

    • Oliver says

      Jan 11, 2015 at 8:29 am

      If we no longer have inquisitions or laws that call for death for working on the sabbath, etc, it’s not due to a lack of the right religion, it’s due to religions having less power than they used to do, and Enlightenment values.

      • Mirren10 says

        Jan 11, 2015 at 9:00 am

        ”If we no longer have inquisitions or laws that call for death for working on the sabbath, etc, it’s not due to a lack of the right religion … ”

        No-one said it was.

        ” it’s due to religions having less power than they used to do, and Enlightenment values.”

        If muslims get their way, islam and sharia will have total power, which will include the murder of those who refuse to submit to it, or dhimmification and the payment of the jizya.

        ”Enlightenment values” are not values admired by the ummah.

  16. dumbledoresarmy says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 9:15 pm

    Perhaps the one thing that all of us jihadwatchers can do is this: we can put the names “Asma Bint Marwan” and “Abu Afak” and “Kab Bin Ashraf” out there via social media and in conversation with our peers as the topic of “Charlie Hebdo” comes up. We can check and have to hand, ready to quote or cut-and-paste, the relevant source references in the canonical texts of Islam; then we state that according to orthodox common-or-garden Islam *everything* Mohammed did, commanded or approved is deemed permanently worthy of emulation and the ultimate guide to Muslim conduct; and we then invite people to put two and two together.

    • OLiver says

      Jan 9, 2015 at 10:15 pm

      Yes, and one of the episodes that also comes to mind, bearing in mind the tragic happenings, is that Ibn Ishaq’s life of Mohammed, the Sirat Rasul Allah explains how one of the things he did after conquering Mecca was to order the deaths of two “singing girls” for having sung satirical songs about him.. So far from being “nothing to do with Islam”, Mohammed would probably have approved of what the killers did.

      • eduardo odraude says

        Jan 11, 2015 at 5:05 am

        Muhammad says there is to be no punishment for murdering someone who insults him
        For example, in Sunan Abu-Dawud, a canonical hadith collection:

        LINK: Book 38, Number 4348:

        Narrated Abdullah Ibn Abbas [a companion of Muhammad]:

        A blind man had a slave-mother [a slave who bore children for him] who used to abuse the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and disparage him. He [the blind man] forbade her but she did not stop. He rebuked her but she did not give up her habit. One night she began to slander the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and abuse him. So he [the blind man] took a dagger, placed it on her belly, pressed it, and killed her. A child who came between her legs was smeared with the blood that was there. When the morning came, the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) was informed about it.

        He assembled the people and said: I adjure by Allah the man who has done this action and I adjure him by my right to him that he should stand up. Jumping over the necks of the people and trembling the man stood up.

        He sat before the Prophet (peace be upon him) and said: Apostle of Allah! I am her master; she used to abuse you and disparage you. I forbade her, but she did not stop, and I rebuked her, but she did not abandon her habit. I have two sons like pearls from her, and she was my companion. Last night she began to abuse and disparage you. So I took a dagger, put it on her belly and pressed it till I killed her.

        Thereupon the Prophet (peace be upon him) said: Oh be witness, no retaliation is payable for her blood.

        Another canonical hadith:

        LINK: Sunan Abu-Dawud, Book 38, Number 4349:

        Narrated Ali ibn AbuTalib [the fourth caliph, and the son-in-law of Muhammad]:

        A Jewess used to abuse the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and disparage him. A man strangled her till she died. The Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) declared that no recompense was payable for her blood.

    • dlbrand says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 12:12 am

      Indeed, Here’s for starters: al-Rasooli on Mohammad and the Media.

      • dlbrand says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 12:43 am

        And yet another, fitting for the hour, Al-Rasooli, with “Muhammad the Coward.”

        • dlbrand says

          Jan 10, 2015 at 12:48 am

          And another: Muhammad’s Compassion and Mercy:

    • Oliver says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 9:10 am

      They should also google “singing girls” and “Farhana”

      • Oliver says

        Jan 10, 2015 at 9:27 am

        Also, Abdullah Khatal, who was the master of the singing girls

    • voegelinian says

      Jan 11, 2015 at 7:35 pm

      “Perhaps the one thing that all of us jihadwatchers can do is this: we can put the names “Asma Bint Marwan” and “Abu Afak” and “Kab Bin Ashraf” out there via social media and in conversation with our peers as the topic of “Charlie Hebdo” comes up.”

      From a recent op-ed in the Daily Mail by famous journalist Piers Morgan (who is angry about the Charlie Hebdo attack, partly because his wife was “born and raised in Paris”), but whose anger gets funneled away from reason to try to find a way to de-Islamize the terrorists. Thus he writes of the terrorists:

      “…their excuse for all this mayhem is predicated entirely on a pack of lies; the Prophet Mohammad never advocated killing people who blasphemed him. Nor does the Qur’an tell anyone to do that, or even mention blasphemy.

      Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2903930/PIERS-MORGAN-accept-Paris-murderers-aren-t-real-Muslims-won-t-MUSLIM-world-say-too.html#ixzz3OYwzs1BD

  17. dlbrand says

    Jan 9, 2015 at 11:21 pm

    Yes, indeed, that is the root problem here: lack of assimilation. Then again, perhaps it is poverty, or an identity crisis issue.

    Here we go again, foolishly asserting and arguing, the actions of the followers of Muhammad are often problematic and murderous for numerous reasons, but, never simply because they are simply just that: followers, emulators of Muhammad.

    The reasons for these killings come straight out of the Book of Allah and the sunnah of his prophet.

    Muhammad was the explainer of the words and meanings in his Allah’s Qur’an; his life, that which we find delineated in the pages and volumes of ahadith and sira, explain Allah’s Book.

    His life thus put action, sinew, blood, and motion into the meaning of “Those who harm Allah and His Messenger, Allah has cursed them in this world and the Next World. He has prepared a humiliating punishment for them. (33:57.)

    And the aforementioned sources make clear, that painful punishment was/is death.
    Death by slaughter, by crucifixion, by torture, by beheading, by strangulation, by impaling via treachery, by just about any effective way one can bring death to the conjectures of Islam and its so-called prophet.

    And just who are those conjectures?

    Tafsir tells us clearly who they are, stating, they are those “(Who are careless) oblivious to believing in Muhammad (pbuh) and the Qur’an….” (Tafsir ibn Abbas, Surah 51:10,11. P.702, [Qur’anic text in parenthesis, exegesis on the text following it, outside parenthesis.])

    Regarded and reliable Islamic sources make crystal clear, it harms their prophet for one to find in him and his din imperfection. It harms him for one to call wrong what the prophet called right. It harms him for one to call right what he called wrong.

    It harms him for anyone to reject his teaching, his guidance, his examples, his instructions; thus it harms him for anyone to reject his sunnah. It harms him for anyone to “rob” him of the “Praiseworthy Station”– and the corresponding regard and deference to the one in that station–that he asserts Allah has given him.

    What’s more, when he is harmed, it is the duty of every Muslim to defend their beloved prophet from and against that harm. Do so, as did the Companions of the prophet, whom, if and when need be, used, to the best of their ability, their lives and their beings shielding him from exposure to a continuance of or opportunity for further “harm. ”

    And for those who do harm to him, Islam promises Allah’s painful punishment is due them, and that punishment delivered, oftentimes, by the hands of the believers.

    This is just basis 21st century Islam in practice, as the Soldiers of Muhammad’s ummah practice the war-tenets of that ummah.

  18. Anon says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 3:53 am

    At 5:03 Walid Phares says “like any ethnic enclave” and “who is indoctrinating” – no Islam is not like any other “ethnic enclave” ChinaTown is not like ShariaTown or Dearborn MI, and it’s not “who is indoctrinating” it’s what BOOK is indoctrinating from birth and teaching youth.

    • dlbrand says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 3:57 am

      Indeed. Absolutely.

  19. sheik yer'mami says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 5:20 am

    Good to see you get some airtime, Mr Spencer.

    This gives me a little hope for the future!

    2015 is going to make a big difference to the counterjihad. A belated Happy New Year to you and your loved ones!

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 11:55 pm

      And a Happy New Year to you and yours as well, Sheik Yer’Mami.

      I hope it is a better year than it seems in these terrible first days.

      I always appreciate your excellent site, Winds of Jihad, which I keep in regular rotation.

  20. Tony says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 7:09 am

    Everyone is missing the point. Western elites are using Islam as their storm troopers to bring in dictatorial controls, that would not normally get done in times of peace. So, fear has to be generated by Islam for people to cry out to their governments to “take care of them” and this “care” is a dictatorship pure and simple. This is the NWO in the making!

    • Darren says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 1:55 pm

      I don’t know how much truth their is to the whole NWO thing, I doubt there is a monolithic organization, it’s more likely a bunch of rich and powerful people and factions who have similar interests and goals if such a thing exists. Though I agree governments are using the whole islam thing as a pretext to gain more power and control. 9/11 proved that. We need to maintain our freedom and not go Orwellian, while finding a solution to this problem.

    • gravenimage says

      Jan 11, 2015 at 12:04 am

      The idea that the threat of Islam is some sort of canard, and that this is all being manipulated by some sort of authoritarian elite is just rot.

      Certainly, some of “Eurabia” had been planned, but on the mistaken “Kumbaya” idea that this would make Europe more colorfully “multicultural”, not on the basis of bringing in some sort of unnamed totalitarian regime.

      This also distracts from the genuine threat of Islam, which is completely out of control by any Infidel authority.

  21. King Dave says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 9:17 am

    Robert Spencer telling it like it is.
    Great Interview.
    Thank you Mr. Spencer

  22. adriana says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 10:09 am

    Is so obvious that the force behind Islam is Satan…SO OBVIOUS! Look at what they do in the name of their god!!! When so you see them happy, helping, forgiving. serving giving hope to people.
    When are they happy? when they kill.
    PLEASE READ THIS i TOOK FROM FACEBOOK

    L. Patrick McCurrin A German’s View on Islam – well worth reading.
    This is one of the best explanations of the Muslim terrorist situation I have ever read. His references to past history are accurate and clear. Not long, easy to u Hard to argue with this:
    nderstand, and well worth the read. The author of this email is Dr. Emanuel Tanya, a well-known and well-respected psychiatrist. A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism.

    ‘Very few people were true Nazis,’ he said, ‘but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come.’

    ‘My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.’

    ‘We are told again and again by ‘experts’ and ‘talking heads’ that Islam is a religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the spectre of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam.’

    ‘The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honour-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers.’

    ‘The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the ‘silent majority,’ is cowed and extraneous. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China’s huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people.’

    ‘The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery? Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were ‘peace loving’?

    ‘History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don’t speak up, because like my friend from Germany , they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun.’

    ‘Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.’

    ‘Now Islamic prayers have been introduced in Toronto and other public schools in Ontario , and, yes, in Ottawa , too, while the Lord’s Prayer was removed (due to being so offensive?). The Islamic way may be peaceful for the time being in our country until the fanatics move in.’

    ‘In Australia , and indeed in many countries around the world, many of the most commonly consumed food items have the halal emblem on them. Just look at the back of some of the most popular chocolate bars, and at other food items in your local supermarket. Food on aircraft have the halal emblem just to appease the privileged minority who are now rapidly expanding within the nation’s shores.’

    ‘In the U.K, the Muslim communities refuse to integrate and there are now dozens of “no-go” zones within major cities across the country that the police force dare not intrude upon. Sharia law prevails there, because the Muslim community in those areas refuse to acknowledge British law.’

    ‘As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts – the fanatics who threaten our way of life.’

    Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious and just deletes this email without sending it on, is contributing to the passiveness that allows the problems to expand.

    Extend yourself a bit and send this on. Let us hope that thousands world-wide read this, think about it, and send it on before it’s too late, and we are silenced because we were silent!!!
    When Japan attacked America we rounded up the Japanese in America, so we would be safe from the inside. Find the known terrorist and lock them up, then we will see if there are any peaceful Muslims.

    • Ron says

      Jan 10, 2015 at 6:57 pm

      Now, if they wanted really “No Go Zones,” we could saturate the zones with Plutonium-239

  23. OldVeteran says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 12:23 pm

    Thank God we have Robert Spencer and Jihadwatch.com for the truth. I’ve read his books. Also read the latest bio on the barbarian prophet Moham: By F.W. Burleigh, “It’s All About Mohammed; the World’s Most Notorious Prophet.” USING ISLAMIC sources, learn how the psychopathic Moham murdered his way thru peaceful Arabs, caravans were taken and the people murdered for their belongings, then the Jews and Christians because they refused to believe Moham’s SELF PROCLAMATION that he was both the Jewish foretold Messiah and the Christian Advocate i.e. Holy Spirit. SO MOham – in his FAKE ALLAH VOICE – abrogated the so-called Make Nice versus and began his raging murderous assault against the peaceful Arabs, non-believers, Jews and Christians. So he turned against all who refused his brand of so-called religion and social system. Youths, with nothing better to do, joined him when promised booty from killing off Arabs in their peaceful trade caravans to get their stuff, then the attacks on property owners to get land. So it goes. Read and learn, and it is very obvious that many readers KNOW the koran and what Moham has in store for us thru the barbarism of islam. As long as the koran contained this mindset of Moham’s psychopathic and murderous hatred and rage carried thru the centuries by his followers, then we sit as islamic targets. Thank God and COUNTRY we have the Second Amendment. I think I will be doing my concealed carry from now on!

  24. Ron says

    Jan 10, 2015 at 6:47 pm

    I think France should establish its own “No Go Zones” surrounding all of the Muslim’s “No Go Zones” thereby granting the Muslim’s wish to not assimilate with French culture, French people and French society.

    I think that France should immediately end welfare to Muslims since taking it would be hypocritical of their inent not to assimilate.

  25. gravenimage says

    Jan 11, 2015 at 12:11 am

    Bravo, Robert Spencer. Good to see that Sean Hannity has had you on his show.

  26. eduardo odraude says

    Jan 11, 2015 at 5:17 am

    Robert is just outstanding. A relief to hear him on Hannity, even when the news is terrible. At least Spencer tells the truth when just about everyone else is lying, hiding, cowering, deluding.

  27. laoch says

    Jan 11, 2015 at 3:19 pm

    We need to stop all emigration for all Muslim countries.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Michael Copeland on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • Dude on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.