Absolutely there are no go zones in the UK, only someone who has no choice would live in a muslim area, at nights there are muslim patrols ordering women to cover up, ordering couples not to hold hands, harassing gays, look on youtube simply put muslim patrol in the search box, Cameron may say there is no such thing but it is there for all to see.
Alarmed Pig Farmersays
Extremist Islamophobe
Shouldn’t that be just Islamophobe? Islamophobe as in having a straight ahead case of the irrational fear and hating of Moslems. I’m not an Islamophobe, I’m an Islamograsp, cuz I read the Holy Ko-Ran, the Hah-Death, and a lot more. The Holy Ko-Ran was commented by a member of the Ulema, a reliable authority on the book’s contents.
***
There is more of the Islam on the TV than anytime since 9/11. Thousands of air time hours are being expended about our gubmint’s reluctance to link the mass murder to the Islam. Whoa, so the best we can do is use the misleading adjectives “extreme” or “radical” to the religion, which ain’t exactly a religion but is one the world’s great faiths, one of the three Abrahamic faiths.
So, the country is presenting itself with a choice between denial of the problem to a false definition of the problem. The adjectives are false because no explanation is given of how exactly the mass murder is extreme and radical from what. To find out what what is, one must go to the scriptures of Islam. How is shooting a dozen people to death more extreme or more radical than Fight until there is no God but Allah and Kill them wherever you find them? How?
Violent extremism or radical Islam or… Islam.
Bob Spinstersays
Oh, well, Robert, you’re a sounding gong, a clashing cymbal. Tiresome, even though you do hit on a couople facts now and then.
The Infidelsays
Oh, well, Bob, you’re a sounding gong, a clashing cymbal. Tiresome, even though you cannot point out anything he has said that is incorrect, non factual, false or defamatory.
Put up your facts or shut up.
Have yourself a great day.
Mirren10says
What a stupid, and irrelevant post.
As The Infidel says, instead of making pointless remarks (I’m sure you think you’re being frightfully witty, but you just come across as thick as a plank), just point out to us where Mr Spencer’s remarks are ”incorrect, non factual, false or defamatory.”
But you can’t, so you resort to petty name calling. Very lefttard, and very Islamic ! 🙂
mortimersays
‘Islamophobia’ is seven fallacies in one: 1) ad hominem 2) red herring 3) poisoned well 4) loaded words 5) exclusion of evidence 6) holy cow fallacy 7) overgeneralization
Calling critics of Islam ‘insane’ is beside the point. What are the facts? The threat of Islamic terrorism is real. The character or sanity of the critic is independent from the truth of a criticism. Thus, the ad hominem fallacy is irrelevant. Facts remain true regardless of the messenger.
Just like ‘Islam is peace’, the ‘Islamophobia’ campaign will run aground when people discover they are being misled with seven fallacies of thought. This complex fallacy is hard to debate, because it is basically name-calling.
‘Islamophobia’ is predominantly a ‘loaded word’ fallacy, but it is also a form of the ‘ad hominem’ fallacy.
‘Islamophobia’ is a slur invented to silence non-Muslims who question Islam and who demand equality of the sexes, free speech and pluralism. It is basically the exclusion of any evidence that will be damaging to the credibility of Islam or Muslims.
Muslims believe they have a special human right not afforded to ‘others’…the right of Muslims never to hear criticism of Islam or Mohammed. They feel ‘hurt’ whenever Muslims commit crimes against humanity, but ‘hurt feelings’ are independent of verifiable facts and cogent reasoning. If facts ‘hurt’ someone’s feelings, too bad.
Georgsays
I don’t get tired of telling Robert how great his appearances are… So, Great appearance, Robert! It’s woeful we have to remind the broader public that it’s not popular speech the forefathers were concerned with defending, but if we must- we must. The simple fact is Islam and every other religion and ideology is perfectly acceptable material for critical analysis and criticism within popular, academic, and whatever other discourse we choose to examine it under. Go Robert!!!
katnissays
Thanks Robert, for your appearances on Fox. Your words are making a difference in educating others on the truth about islam. Keep it up!
CAIR needs to quit whining. The First Amendment forever!
Spot Onsays
I saw Robert on Steve Malzberg’s show. CAIR is part of the phoney propaganda machine of radical Islam. Robert is the real expert on real Islam.
laochsays
I think that every major city in Europe now has no go zone that are Muslim dominated. I fact that no one or very few in the media are talking about . Why would a French Muslim terrorist leave the country so easy if she did not have help for other Muslims.
Kaseysays
Forget about being accused of being an Islamophobe…….far more practical and true is being an “Islamorealist” in all areas concerning Islam.
albert says
Absolutely there are no go zones in the UK, only someone who has no choice would live in a muslim area, at nights there are muslim patrols ordering women to cover up, ordering couples not to hold hands, harassing gays, look on youtube simply put muslim patrol in the search box, Cameron may say there is no such thing but it is there for all to see.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Extremist Islamophobe
Shouldn’t that be just Islamophobe? Islamophobe as in having a straight ahead case of the irrational fear and hating of Moslems. I’m not an Islamophobe, I’m an Islamograsp, cuz I read the Holy Ko-Ran, the Hah-Death, and a lot more. The Holy Ko-Ran was commented by a member of the Ulema, a reliable authority on the book’s contents.
***
There is more of the Islam on the TV than anytime since 9/11. Thousands of air time hours are being expended about our gubmint’s reluctance to link the mass murder to the Islam. Whoa, so the best we can do is use the misleading adjectives “extreme” or “radical” to the religion, which ain’t exactly a religion but is one the world’s great faiths, one of the three Abrahamic faiths.
So, the country is presenting itself with a choice between denial of the problem to a false definition of the problem. The adjectives are false because no explanation is given of how exactly the mass murder is extreme and radical from what. To find out what what is, one must go to the scriptures of Islam. How is shooting a dozen people to death more extreme or more radical than Fight until there is no God but Allah and Kill them wherever you find them? How?
Violent extremism or radical Islam or… Islam.
Bob Spinster says
Oh, well, Robert, you’re a sounding gong, a clashing cymbal. Tiresome, even though you do hit on a couople facts now and then.
The Infidel says
Oh, well, Bob, you’re a sounding gong, a clashing cymbal. Tiresome, even though you cannot point out anything he has said that is incorrect, non factual, false or defamatory.
Put up your facts or shut up.
Have yourself a great day.
Mirren10 says
What a stupid, and irrelevant post.
As The Infidel says, instead of making pointless remarks (I’m sure you think you’re being frightfully witty, but you just come across as thick as a plank), just point out to us where Mr Spencer’s remarks are ”incorrect, non factual, false or defamatory.”
But you can’t, so you resort to petty name calling. Very lefttard, and very Islamic ! 🙂
mortimer says
‘Islamophobia’ is seven fallacies in one: 1) ad hominem 2) red herring 3) poisoned well 4) loaded words 5) exclusion of evidence 6) holy cow fallacy 7) overgeneralization
Calling critics of Islam ‘insane’ is beside the point. What are the facts? The threat of Islamic terrorism is real. The character or sanity of the critic is independent from the truth of a criticism. Thus, the ad hominem fallacy is irrelevant. Facts remain true regardless of the messenger.
Just like ‘Islam is peace’, the ‘Islamophobia’ campaign will run aground when people discover they are being misled with seven fallacies of thought. This complex fallacy is hard to debate, because it is basically name-calling.
‘Islamophobia’ is predominantly a ‘loaded word’ fallacy, but it is also a form of the ‘ad hominem’ fallacy.
‘Islamophobia’ is a slur invented to silence non-Muslims who question Islam and who demand equality of the sexes, free speech and pluralism. It is basically the exclusion of any evidence that will be damaging to the credibility of Islam or Muslims.
Muslims believe they have a special human right not afforded to ‘others’…the right of Muslims never to hear criticism of Islam or Mohammed. They feel ‘hurt’ whenever Muslims commit crimes against humanity, but ‘hurt feelings’ are independent of verifiable facts and cogent reasoning. If facts ‘hurt’ someone’s feelings, too bad.
Georg says
I don’t get tired of telling Robert how great his appearances are… So, Great appearance, Robert! It’s woeful we have to remind the broader public that it’s not popular speech the forefathers were concerned with defending, but if we must- we must. The simple fact is Islam and every other religion and ideology is perfectly acceptable material for critical analysis and criticism within popular, academic, and whatever other discourse we choose to examine it under. Go Robert!!!
katnis says
Thanks Robert, for your appearances on Fox. Your words are making a difference in educating others on the truth about islam. Keep it up!
CAIR needs to quit whining. The First Amendment forever!
Spot On says
I saw Robert on Steve Malzberg’s show. CAIR is part of the phoney propaganda machine of radical Islam. Robert is the real expert on real Islam.
laoch says
I think that every major city in Europe now has no go zone that are Muslim dominated. I fact that no one or very few in the media are talking about . Why would a French Muslim terrorist leave the country so easy if she did not have help for other Muslims.
Kasey says
Forget about being accused of being an Islamophobe…….far more practical and true is being an “Islamorealist” in all areas concerning Islam.