Earlier today I was on Sun TV’s Straight Talk with Pat Bolland, discussing the new demands the Islamic State had made regarding its Jordanian and Japanese hostages, and jihad murderer Sajida al-Rishawi.
Earlier today I was on Sun TV’s Straight Talk with Pat Bolland, discussing the new demands the Islamic State had made regarding its Jordanian and Japanese hostages, and jihad murderer Sajida al-Rishawi.
Ayatrollah says
Does anyone outside of the islamaphobs mention that the islamic state has the right under Islamic law to ask for ransom for prisoners?
tilda says
OT:
Gunman (Tarik Zahzah) storms Dutch TV station demanding to be put on air.
Allegedly claimed to be not on his own, and that 8 high explosives with radioactive material had been planted.
He is “not believed to be linked to Islamic extremism”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2932056/Gunman-arrested-storming-studios-Dutch-national-broadcaster-demanding-air.html
Ed says
It must not be true because nowhere anyone said he is a muslim or islamic. /sarcasm
cs says
They are saying he is part of a hacker group, it may be so. Looks nerdy too me.
Mirren10 says
From the Daily Mail article tilde posted:
”It reported that he appeared to be a student who had recently lost both parents. It also said he did not figure on security services’ lists of suspected Islamist militants”
If he is a mohammedan, and going by the name he would appear to be, we have yet another ‘moderate’ mohammedan exhibiting sudden jihad syndrome.
And if he *is*, the comment, ”recently lost both parents” gives the msm and security/police their favourite excuse; he was crazed with grief, or mentally unstable, not a jihadist at all.
JOSEPH says
I believe there should be an exchange. 100 tons of bombs dropped for every pound of hostage that they hold. Muslims only understand violence, so talk to them in the language they understand.
Roger says
For every head cut off give them one nuke
Matthieu Baudin says
What a fine speaker we have in Robert Spencer, putting out a detailed message clearly and concisely.
He must travel to Europe more often to help rally the citizenry. We need the promise of hope that the New World conveys through leaders like Mr Spencer.
Richie says
Um,,,look at 7:22, notice that creature in a hijab looks EXACTLY like Obama?
Mattt-ن says
Chek this out .. A terrorist group buying properties in canada … WTF
http://m.torontosun.com/2015/01/29/muslim-group-linked-to-terror-organization-buying-buildings-across-canada
Jere Joiner says
Sooner or later, the evil of Islam with have to be confronted. There are only two ways to confront it and they must be simultaneous: 1) on the ground with military force; 2) in schools where jihad is being taught. The Islamist soldiers and sympathizers in mosques must be wiped out. Muslim children must be educated to believe jihad is uncivilized. Both Islam and the Christian/Jewish Bible preach violence, but only Islam takes it seriously and thus remains uncivilized. We can argue forever about the tenants of the two faiths, but violence must be set aside forever.
Mirren10 says
” Both Islam and the Christian/Jewish Bible preach violence”.
No, they don’t. The koran is the only one that does. It is, for mohammedans, the true word of ‘allah’, and it’s commands are prescriptive, and for all time.
There is *no* call to violence in the New Testament, and in the Old Testament, violence is descriptive, not prescriptive.
Blitz2b says
@Mirren “There is *no* call to violence in the New Testament, and in the Old Testament, violence is descriptive, not prescriptive.”
Precisely Mirren, I am so sick and tired of leftards and their ilk spouting nonsense like this, without actually doing some of their own thinking.
Where have the times gone when critical thinking was an essential element to being an called an intellectual?
Nowadays even in the universities, no one dare say or think anything negative if it concerns Islam. All the criticisms can be directed towards Christianity and Jesus, the Bible and all the prophets and the historical warfare within those pages.
When it comes to Islam, even learned professors and scholars in almost every university, in the west, will willingly put on blinders and not only will they refuse to discuss the Koran, the Hadiths and the Sira of Mohammad, but in order to whitewash all the Islamic violence happening in every corner of the globe, they throw in Judeo-Christianity in the mix, to justify violence in the name of religion and to somehow soften the impact.
With them politicians of every stripe, and even religious leaders, like the Dali-Lama and Pope of Rome go out of their way to exonerate Islam every time an atrocity is committed by Muslims in the name of Islam. Somehow these “wise kafirun” think they know more about Islam than the actual believers.
The more I hear of celebrities, politicians and even religious leaders holding water for Islam the more I believe some kind of diabolical mind control is at play here.
Christ warned us of these times…
Read:
Matthew 24: For there shall arise false christs and false prophets and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch that, if it were possible, THEY SHALL DECEIVE THE VERY ELECT.
Alicia says
Americans and non-Muslims in general have been taught that Shariah covers the parting of a will, stoning and other barbaric ‘hudud’ laws. The aspect on wills is fine and mostly accepted by everyone as being benign. Stoning and other ‘hudud’ laws including punishment for apostasy is seen as inconsequential to those living in non-Muslim dominant countries.
Hence, if all you’re going to talk about are these two areas then you are doing the Muslims a huge favor!!! Your message essentially says that Shariah can be compatible with Western value since ‘hudud’ laws aren’t going to happen.
What you should cover are the dhimmi and ‘diyya’ areas of Shariah which clearly state that non-Muslims are seen as being lower than Muslims. This is a crucial message you want to get across.
There are clear writing on ‘diyya’ even if they differ from country to country – the difference can be used to highlight the man-made aspect of Shariah which clearly contradicts Muslims’ assertion that Shariah is a legal doctrine from their god.
Coverage of dhimmis or dhimmitude whill make it clear that Shariah, wherever it has been applied for the past 1400 years, is an apartheid system that subjugates non-Muslims to horrific treatment under Muslims. There is ample evidence of this historically as well as current.
Jiyza is another area that can be covered. Muslims have applied jiyza to non-Muslims by using government coffers to upkeep and promote Islam disproportionately at the expense of other religions.
gravenimage says
Alicia wrote:
Americans and non-Muslims in general have been taught that Shariah covers the parting of a will, stoning and other barbaric ‘hudud’ laws. The aspect on wills is fine and mostly accepted by everyone as being benign…
………………………….
I’m afraid even wills and family law are not exactly benign in Islam—girls may only inherit half of what males receive, and Infidels may not inherit at all.
You are quite right, though, that it is the Hudud laws—flogging, amputation, and stoning—that are most frightening.
Islofob IS-1 says
Well, Jordan has stepped forward with a new direction , Think about every country following this idea , it is a forced option, perhaps the only way to end islam’s terror…
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/01/jordan-threatens-isis-kill-our-pilot-well-execute-all-your-prisoners/