• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

White House: Obama will fight media to stop anti-jihad articles

Jan 13, 2015 4:39 pm By Robert Spencer

ObamaMore self-censorship and voluntary acceptance of Sharia blasphemy laws. The President of the United States is now (again) signaling that terrorism works: he is saying he will act to curtail Americans’ freedom of expression because Muslims are committing mass murder in response of the freedom of expression. He could have said that he would defend those who say things that jihadis dislike from violent attacks, but no. He was as consistent as ever. And the freedom of speech will suffer for it. How long before he shuts down Jihad Watch, to appease our jihadi brethren?

“White House: Obama Will Fight Media To Stop Anti-Jihad Articles,” by Neil Munro, Daily Caller, January 13, 2015:

President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defenses forces, the White House’s press secretary said Jan. 12.

“The president … will not now be shy about expressing a view or taking the steps that are necessary to try to advocate for the safety and security of our men and women in uniform” whenever journalists’ work may provoke jihadist attacks, spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at the White House’s daily briefing.

The unprecedented reversal of Americans’ civil-military relations, and of the president’s duty to protect the First Amendment, was pushed by Earnest as he tried to excuse the administration’s opposition in 2012 to the publication of anti-jihadi cartoons by the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo.

The White House voiced its objections in 2012 after the magazine’s office were burned by jihadis, followings its publication of anti-jihadi cartoons.

Earnest’s defense of tho 2012 objections came just five days after the magazine’s office was attacked by additional jihadis. Eight journalists, two policeman and a visitor were murdered by two French-born Muslims who objected to the magazine’s criticism of Islam’s final prophet.

In 2012, “there was a genuine concern that the publication of some of those materials could put Americans abroad at risk, including American soldiers at risk,” Earnest said.

“That is something that the commander in chief takes very seriously,” he added, before saying that “the president and his spokesman was not then and will not now be shy about expressing a view or taking the steps that are necessary to try to advocate for the safety and security of our men and women in uniform.”

In December, Congress approved and the president signed a $585 billion defense budget to train and equip soldiers, marines, sailors and airmen to defend Americans — including journalists — from foreign threats. The nation’s media industry does not have a defense budget to protect soldiers.

Earnest tried to rationalize the president’s opposition to the publication of anti-jihadist materials as a moral duty.

Whenever journalists consider publishing materials disliked by jihadis, “I think there are a couple of absolutes,” he told the reporters.

The first is “that the publication of any kind of material in no way justifies any act of violence, let alone an act of violence that we saw on the scale in Paris,” he said.

The second absolute is the president’s duty to lobby editors and reporters against publishing anti-jihadi information, he said. ”And there is — this president, as the commander in chief, believes strongly in the responsibility that he has to advocate for our men and women in uniform, particularly if it’s going to make them safer,” Earnest said.

He repeated the two-fisted formulation a moment later. ”What won’t change is our view that that freedom of expression in no way justifies an act of violence against the person who expressed a view. And the president considers the safety and security of our men and women in uniform to be something worth fighting for,” he said.

Throughout the press conference, Earnest repeatedly said the media would be able to decide on its own whether to publish pictures, articles or facts that could prompt another murderous jihad attack by Muslim against journalists.

But he did not say that his government has a constitutional and moral duty to use the nation’s huge military to protect journalists from armed jihadis, but instead hinted strongly that journalists should submit to jihadi threats.

“I think that there are any number of reasons that [U.S.] media organizations have made a decision not to reprint the cartoons” after the January attack, he said. “In some cases, maybe they were concerned about their physical safety. In other cases, they were exercising some judgment in a different way. So we certainly would leave it to media organizations to make a decision like this.”

“What I’m saying is that individual news organizations have to assess that risk for themselves,” he said. “I think the point in the mind of the president and certainly everybody here at the White House is that that is a question that should be answered by journalists.”

“I’m confident in saying that for the vast majority of media organizations, that [fear is] not the only factor. But I would readily concede that it is one in the minds of many of those news executives. But again, that is a decision for all of them to make,” he said….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Barack Obama, dhimmitude, Featured, free speech, Islamic supremacism, United States, Useful idiots Tagged With: Charlie Hebdo


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Marty says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 4:42 pm

    The Chinese are dominated by a totalitarian regime, but it is a regime that is doing something right: it is killing jihadists who attack Chinese citizens.

  2. albert says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 4:48 pm

    “F**K CHARLIE HEBDO …..JE SUIS BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA !!!!!!! “

    • mortimer says

      Jan 13, 2015 at 6:10 pm

      Obama has betrayed the freedom of the world. The terrorists have won.

      Military personnel need to know what they’re fighting for…FREEDOM!

      • eduardo odraude says

        Jan 13, 2015 at 7:05 pm

        Good point.

  3. Richie says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 4:49 pm

    I fear the day may come when Obama will have brave people like Robert Spencer and Pamela Gellar arrested for speaking the truth about Islam

    • jihad3tracker says

      Jan 13, 2015 at 5:55 pm

      HOW MUCH CLEARER COULD THE INTENT BE — JOSH EARNEST IS TELLING YOU . . .

      OUR PREZ IS IN FULL EMOTIONAL MELTDOWN PRIVATELY — THIS IS HOW HE PLANS TO GET REVENGE FOR THOSE WHO EXPOSE HIM

      ROBERT SPENCER IS CORRECT : JIHADWATCH IS ON THE “ELIMINATE” LIST — RIGHT AT THE TOP.

      CAIR HAS WORKED 24/7 ON THIS FOR MONTHS — LOOKS LIKE THEY SCORED BIG TIME.

      TO POSTERS HERE — FAIR WARNING : EXPECT THE MOST DILIGENT OF US TO BE TARGETED TOO . . . SERIOUSLY, I AM SORRY TO SAY.

      • AnneM says

        Jan 13, 2015 at 8:46 pm

        “TO POSTERS HERE — FAIR WARNING : EXPECT THE MOST DILIGENT OF US TO BE TARGETED TOO . . . SERIOUSLY, I AM SORRY TO SAY.”

        If you do not use your real name, you are safe.

        • John C. Barile says

          Jan 14, 2015 at 8:21 am

          Well, it’s off to the FEMA-run ReEducation And Correct Thinking camp for me, li’l ol’ Lackluster Nebbish!

  4. Ross says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 4:53 pm

    I can’t say it enough. Our country is being attacked from within by a Muslim in sheep’s clothing and his numerous Muslim advisors.

    He quacks and walks like a duck and yet the idiots on the left who elected him are oblivious because they are invested in him. They voted for him to prove to their friends that they aren’t racists. Now they refuse to see what they have done.

  5. Blurb1000 says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 4:57 pm

    You show no respect to this man with this article. His name is Barack HUSSEIN Obama.
    So, go to sleep now. Don’t worry. Everything will be ok.

    • Blurb1000 says

      Jan 13, 2015 at 5:03 pm

      Sorry, i forget PBUH after the Hussein thing…

  6. Bezelel says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:01 pm

    IF that is IF the numb nuts, lop eared, double gay, muslim sympathizing, enemy of freedom, imposter POS POTUS, cared anything about our troops, he would NOT embolden jihadis by rewarding their terrorism.

    • St. Croix says

      Jan 13, 2015 at 7:19 pm

      Yep. It’s a new illustration for the psychology textbooks, a good example of negative reinforcement: Just like the whining fussing child manipulates the parent by stopping the noise when he gets what he wants, the angry muslims kill those who freely express themselves and threaten to keep it up, so the cowed leader gives in and does anything they want to “make them stop”–such as striving to take away freedom of expression.

      Of course, they won’t really stop. They will keep on beating the infidel down.

      Another thing strikes me about this. The way those who dare to stand up and defy Islam are just cut adrift by the very forces which are in place to protect them. And in America especially, this is an enshrined law that should be upheld. Those who express themselves in the face of threats and murder should not be abandoned but given whatever is needed to protect them. I’m an independent comic artist as well, but because I don’t have the funds to create a “panic room” or hire a bodyguard, I have to think about how I can say what I would like to and yet not be driven into an underground warren like a rabbit. Or caught in a snare. I’m not ready to die yet!

      It really does look like I will have to publish things anonymously.

      • Bezelel says

        Jan 13, 2015 at 8:21 pm

        @St Croix, I have been in the art biz since around 84, Cartooning has not been on my resume but current events have had me thinking about it a lot too. Anonymity might be more advisable as a defense from obola than jihadi’s.Where there’s a will there’s a way.

        • St. Croix says

          Jan 13, 2015 at 9:54 pm

          @Bezelel So much good material, don’t you think? Any one of these articles on JW supplies a wealth of ideas to work from. Yes, there has to be some way to do it and not catch the obola.

        • Bezelel says

          Jan 13, 2015 at 10:11 pm

          Fertile ground for sure. Check this out:
          http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/05/drawing-muhammad-dessiner-mahomet.html

    • Bezelel says

      Jan 13, 2015 at 7:50 pm

      @GW,No need to take offense unless your name is obama. I guess more info is in order though.
      http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/08/08/fox-news-email-chains.html

  7. Ren says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:02 pm

    How much time does the man have left for presidency? Let’s pray for that day… it’ll come!

    • mariam rove says

      Jan 13, 2015 at 5:10 pm

      Too much,.way too much.m

  8. Undaunted says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:06 pm

    If he was really interested in protecting the troops, he would not have put in place such restrictive rules or engagement for combat operations. He’d have loosed the dogs of war and let our warriors kill all the bad-guys and break all their stuff.

  9. Ashley says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:09 pm

    “President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defenses forces, the White House’s press secretary said Jan. 12.”
    ___________________________

    OMG! Why not say this:

    “President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s meat processing industry when it is planning to trot out pork products that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defenses forces, the White House’s press secretary said Jan. 12.”

    • Bezelel says

      Jan 13, 2015 at 5:17 pm

      @Ashley, They are probably planning that just around the bend.
      http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/08/08/fox-news-email-chains.html
      An interesting insight about the prez.

      • pumbar says

        Jan 13, 2015 at 9:45 pm

        I noticed that information on Reggie Love shows that he was a “wide receiver”.

        That conjured up some bizarre images…

  10. Undaunted says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:10 pm

    rules OF engagement…

    Geez.

  11. Dave J says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:11 pm

    The future must not belong to those who would lecture or intimidate a free press from using their civil and freedom of speech rights.

  12. Dave J says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:14 pm

    How dare he talk about “moral responsibility” as he caves to the jihadist tactics?

    • Ashley says

      Jan 13, 2015 at 5:16 pm

      Bravo, Dave!

  13. Angemon says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:35 pm

    President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defenses forces, the White House’s press secretary said Jan. 12.

    This is not bad news, this is terrible news. Who gets to decide what might constitute a spark for a jihad attack and what doesn’t? Obama and his MB buddies? Jihadis don’t need a news article or a satirical cartoon to attack US forces, like the jihadi massacre of Fort Hood proves. This is just the turd of enforcing sharia with a different name and claiming it’s what’s best for us.

    You know who knew what was best for everyone? Every single totalitarian ideology and/or regime ever.

  14. zebo says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:36 pm

    Well my christian friends.
    Can anyone explain me how it is possible that a “christian” like Obama isn’t having a christian name.
    His first name “bara(c)k” is used by muslims and jews,depending how it is written
    his second name is a 100% muslim name.

    How can you be a christian without a christian name??

    • Lesley says

      Jan 13, 2015 at 5:44 pm

      @zebo: Anyone can be a Christian. Your name doesn’t matter to Jesus. I’m not a religious person, but if I have to pick a team, I’ll be on the Judeo-Christian side…

      • zebo says

        Jan 14, 2015 at 8:17 am

        Obama belonged to a church
        therefore he should have been baptised?
        or am i wrong?

        • rev g says

          Jan 14, 2015 at 8:27 am

          Good questjon. His church did bappen to be very islam friendly. They bestowed some honor upon imam Farrakhan of Nation of islam, for example. Anything is possible.

    • pumbar says

      Jan 13, 2015 at 9:47 pm

      Jesus was a Christian and he had a Jewish name?

      • zebo says

        Jan 14, 2015 at 8:20 am

        1() Jesus was the first christian,therefore there were no existing christian names to choose from
        2) i have never heard of a jew having the name Jesus

  15. Renee says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:37 pm

    My anti-jihad speech while I still can:
    I am anti the prophet of islam who instructed people that they need to die and slaughter as many other people as possible in order to go to paradise.

    I am pro Christ who died for us so we could live and Who wants us to tell others so they may also live.

    Religions are NOT the same. The difference is between live and death.

  16. mortimer says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:40 pm

    Surrenderism. Chamberlain.

  17. Lesley says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:41 pm

    I can’t believe this is happening to the United States. I mean, President Obama is a parent– this is one of the most important concepts of parenting… you reward the behavior you want to encourage, not the negative behavior. Our President is giving in to the demands of jihadis?

    • Ernie says

      Jan 14, 2015 at 12:22 am

      Certainly Obama is rewarding the negative behaviour , very encouraging for islamic terrorrists . Islamic terrorism works !

    • Judi says

      Jan 14, 2015 at 10:57 am

      Lesley – yes, but don’t forget he’s said he hopes his daughters turn out like the daughters of his best friend Recep Erogan of Turkey!

  18. Wellington says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:43 pm

    Just more evidence that there is not design in Obama (those averring such give this mediocrity too much credit). Rather, only confusion of mind, a dearth of knowledge and a woeful understanding of both the American Constitution and America properly characterizes this pathetic man.

    Really, folks, the key to understanding this extraordinarily underwhelming human being is to never, EVER, overestimate him. He’s a nothing who slipped through the cracks of history much as Islam did. Go from there and the truth of things will follow. After all, shit sometimes happens. Islam is proof of this. So is Obama.

  19. islamisdeath says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:47 pm

    Really, really, really scarey. The imam in the White House who did not go to France is emboldened by the success of his brethren in France who attacked the press in a lethal manner.

  20. Ashley says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:55 pm

    Slightly OT…

    I have a ton of respect and admiration for those willing to carry the much anticipated Charlie Hebdo magazine post-massacre. I’m sure it wasn’t an easy decision to make.

    Here’s hoping it sells more copies than the vile depiction of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on the cover of Rolling Stone.

    • Ashley says

      Jan 13, 2015 at 6:38 pm

      …and speaking of that little prick Tsarnaev…

      http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ff18010ecda447a2b2fe4cc5bfdbe95c/paris-attacks-could-prompt-new-bid-delay-tsarnaev-trial

  21. josepxicot says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:58 pm

    Obama is against the free press,America is going down,on liberties,but in a lot of places in the schools
    the study of religion,when it is about the islam,the teacher ask for a dress above all the young girls like
    they where living in a muslim country,and the parents who ask for it they are into islamofobic level for
    the teachers which are into politically correct and now with O,bama the situation is drammatical for the
    parents.very bad times for freedom

  22. Beth says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 5:58 pm

    “President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defenses forces”

    I believe Josh Earnest is lying – and that he knows he is lying – but has a lot of faith in the “Stupid Americans” (not my words).

    It is the silence of the truth that is causing so many attacks. Josh Earnest has it backwards (but, I believe he knows this).

    This administration is as corrupt as it gets. Since when did it become a Righteous thing to do, – to stay silent about vicious evil teachings? Are not the teachings of beheadings evil? (Yes. Yes, they are – and this is what earnest is defending – and protecting – and he knows it).

  23. Georg says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 6:13 pm

    Obama does not do this to protect iir soldiers. He has a reflexive, irrepresible reaction to obfuscate/deny regarding Islamism, and more cringingly and unforgivably, jihadism (smh), due to a neurosis whereby he feels these critiques are aimed at his father, and more distantly, non-whites in general. He writes a book “Dreams of my Father”… Well, what about “Dreams of my Mother”– you know– the woman who actually stuck it through and went through the trouble of raising him properly? What about her? Why no book? I can’t imagine what it could be… Now I wonder whether my previous e-mail for this account was hacked by terrorists or the government. I had assumed terrorists, but I’m not so sure anymore. Man.. We’re getting it from every difection these days. My friend, who can code, found the IP address of who was accessing my account. What a surprise the only obvious hacking I’ve experienced involves this subject. Be careful, all, and don’t be in a position to be surprised by anything. Good luck, Robert, we’re here for you as you are and have been for us.

    • Green Infidel says

      Jan 14, 2015 at 2:26 am

      Interesting. What did the IP address reveal? And how did you come to suspect that you were being hacked?

      Agree it’s something we should all bear in mind.

      • Georg says

        Jan 14, 2015 at 12:32 pm

        Hi Green Infidel,

        The IP address revealed location (I would rather not say where/be too specific). The hacking came to my attention via the e-mail service. They mentioned potentially suspicious activity and I confirmed with them it was not me logging in. Again, I’d rather not be too specific. I would caution everyone to be very careful with having personal information available through email (real name, address, financial info., etc.). I think we just need to be cautious, but not frightened.

        • Georg says

          Jan 14, 2015 at 3:10 pm

          There is actually a bit more information we were able to get, which I don’t want to be specific about. To be clear, though, if anything criminal ever comes of it I/we have enough information to go to authorities and likely locate the household the hacking originated from. I’m only being vague because I don’t want to do the hackers any favors. This is obviously a war of many fronts.

  24. Dracula says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 6:19 pm

    The cynical manipulation at play here is contemptible. President Obama knows that the majority of Americans are sentimental about the military, so he thinks that spinning the betrayal of the same Constitution it demands an oath to protect as protecting soldiers will handily sway the proles.

    It’s glaring with condescension and resentment towards his own countrymen.

  25. Jaladhi says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 6:26 pm

    Elections have consequences – it was said by a certain Prez. Now we are seeing the dictators spirit coming out in open!!!

  26. Green Infidel says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 6:43 pm

    For anyone interested in the full conference transcript (from the White House website):

    http://m.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/01/12/press-briefing-press-secretary-josh-earnest-1122015

    Nothing about the need to uphold the constitution. Just talk about “responsibilities” to go with freedom of speech, that it’s opinions that “endanger” soldiers, not Jihadis, and that media organisations which fear violence should “make their own judgment”. With no statement saying that no American should ever feel threatened for expressing their opinion.

    To be honest, the full conference seems worse still than the Daily Caller article. Would one ever guess that this was the spokesman of the president of the USA, a country with the First Amendment?

  27. eduardo odraude says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 7:10 pm

    Obama’s spokesman is saying the media will be able to decide on its own what to publish? Gee, thanks! Like we don’t have freedom of speech unless Obama gives the go ahead!

    Journalists don’t need some would-be dictator president to tell them what they can and can’t publish.

  28. profitsbeard says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 7:12 pm

    Obama is the top Quisling of Western Civilization.

    Spineless and treasonous.

    Enabling The Jihad every grotesque and gutless way he can.

  29. rayra says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 7:15 pm

    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

    That’s the oath this deconstructionist Marxist POS took when he assumed office.

    The First Amendment:
    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

    —

    I presume then that this phony ‘constitutional scholar’ has decided that it doesn’t say the President can’t suppress free speech.

    • eib says

      Jan 13, 2015 at 9:21 pm

      If he betrays the 1st amendment to Islam, impeach, impeach, impeach, impeach. Make no treaty w/oic. Damn the Istanbul process to hell.

      • Juanita says

        Jan 14, 2015 at 3:18 pm

        I wish he would be impeached. He has violated so many Constitutional Laws it makes me sick thinking about it. His overreach of power is mind blowing….I am only one person I cannot storm the hill without millions of Americans with me. Why is it that I always read “impeach” however; no one does anything about it?? Actions speak louder than words!!!!!!!!!! It’s crazy what this man no coward is getting away with. I am sad my beautiful country is looking more and more like the USSR. 🙁

        • Martin Vink says

          Jan 14, 2015 at 7:28 pm

          There appear to be sufficient acts that are each sufficient to impeach Hussein Obama. It may be tough to impeach him on the basis of treason but, I submit, that it is treason to support the Muslim brotherhood and Hamas.

    • Mrs. Sherringham says

      Jan 14, 2015 at 9:35 am

      A traitor foul and dangerous.

  30. Papa Whiskey says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 7:15 pm

    “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

    — John F. Kennedy, Address on the first Anniversary of the Alliance for Progress.
    March 13, 1962

    The same principle applies to resistance, a point Barry Hussein and his legion of leftist lickspittles had best mark well.

    http://gatesofvienna.net/2015/01/i-am-not-charlie-ill-shoot-back/

    • AnneM says

      Jan 13, 2015 at 8:42 pm

      Safe to say, stuff like this will plant the seeds for a future violent revolt a reality.

  31. Omi-san says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 7:27 pm

    Way too many politicians, columnists and journalists are “Faux-charlie”. They are against terrorism…BUT.

  32. rev g says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 7:44 pm

    As a veteran I am appalled that the potus would try and justify his attacks on constitutional rights by trying to justify it on the backs of our military. Our military exists to protect our rights, not as a reason to attempt to negate them.

  33. Daniel says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 8:09 pm

    It’s just shocking. After all the crap I’ve come to expect from this ‘man’ this is still shocking.
    How do Americans tolerate this filth as their leader?

  34. Anti-Dhimmification says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 8:26 pm

    Hey, where’s the land of the free and home of the brave off to?
    “for we must not offend those, that want our heads” even if we don’t offend them?, oops…

    The PC/libtard collusion with sunni extremists practicing taqquiya to establish dar-ul-islam, seems to be succeeding so well all across the countries that believe in “freedom of speech” , and specially in the US (only place with complete freedom of speech) but staying on our knees about facts that are not only simple but which are a global cause for worry for this ” one religion for the world” , oh and also “the last religion” etc etc .. but in any case, In India there was a show in Hindi on jihad craziness going all around the world.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=aDAekiuAe7Y

    I wonder when the so-called free-speechy folks will dare to even discuss the scriptural authority on tv specially in “developed countries” which are strategic allies of countries that keep the transnational terrorist making pot boiling.(like the country they found the osama fellow in)

    Oh and nowadays liberal seems to mean, free speech = bad, however taqquiya= great (perhaps liberals can learn better taqquiya from President Obama)

  35. Nicu says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 8:39 pm

    Germany is ruled by the US – so this says all : how can we win ? 🙁

  36. Joe Shmo says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 10:41 pm

    “Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.” Benjamin Franklin

    • Richie says

      Jan 13, 2015 at 11:37 pm

      ‘and will lose both’

  37. jay says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 10:56 pm

    Yeah, because god forbid we actually use our soldiers to defend our citizens exercising their rights rather than sending them overseas to be jihadi fodder. Imagine that.

  38. Richie says

    Jan 13, 2015 at 11:35 pm

    Obama isn’t even bothering to hide his loyalties anymore.

    He sides with Islam

    He didn’t participate in the rally in paris because he sides with Islam

    He will try and push for legislation to criminalize any criticism and discussion of violent Jihad because he sides with islam

  39. Champ says

    Jan 14, 2015 at 12:27 am

    American’s wanted ‘Change’ …

    http://rightwingart.com/artuploads/image1/d93aa852-b045-49d2-9660-021770636435.png

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    …hey I didn’t vote for this devil posing as our president!

    • John C. Barile says

      Jan 14, 2015 at 8:05 am

      Champ,

      My six-year-old girl wouldn’t vote for him in 2008 either–in her classroom’s straw poll. Quite vociferous about it she was, too.

      [Hint: I showed her that photoshopped picture, sans any comments.}

      • John C. Barile says

        Jan 14, 2015 at 8:09 am

        I also showed her a cartoon in which Piglet and Miss Piggy demonstrated for free speech, waving Motoon placards, to the rage and terror of Muslim onlookers.

  40. Tommy Guns says

    Jan 14, 2015 at 1:03 am

    What’s it going to take to remove the first president in American history, for treason????? If Bill Clinton was almost impeached for getting a hand job, what should Obama receive?? If he doesn’t get tried for treason, he should at least be impeached!!
    IMPEACH! IMPEACH! IMPEACH! IMPEACH! IMPEACH! IMPEACH!, IMPEACH! IMPEACH! IMPEACH!

    • cathy says

      Jan 14, 2015 at 3:12 pm

      Your funny…..thanks, very strange times.cl

  41. andy says

    Jan 14, 2015 at 4:12 am

    Now, Obama will fight aganst his own people with the Jihadist. Welcome to the jihadist Club, berry. Dont forget to redeem your 72 angels.

    • John C. Barile says

      Jan 14, 2015 at 8:13 am

      72 houris. Unless he opts for boys white as glistening pearls.

  42. duh_swami says

    Jan 14, 2015 at 6:10 am

    Rasulullah Obama is a stealth jihadist using the WH as a mosque from which to launch various attacks on the American public. He has already attacked free speech, and so has Hillary, by the way. Impeachment is too good for him, a trial for treason would be more appropriate, but I don’t expect the spineless to do much of anything…

    • John C. Barile says

      Jan 14, 2015 at 8:16 am

      Now we know why he chose not to show support for the Paris solidarity march. He just isn’t one with us, really.

  43. pongidae rex says

    Jan 14, 2015 at 8:11 am

    Obama stood in front of the UN General Assembly and gave a treasonous speech in which he declared that it should be a crime to ‘slander the prophet mohammad’. This is a totall abrogation of the First Article of the Billl of RIghts to the US Constitution, that he is sworn to uphold.

    It it truely unbelievable the free pass this man has received because of his race. If white, he would have been impeached for the UN speech alone.

    If US troops are threatened, they should annihilate the threat. If they cannot, there is something seriously wrong with our military leadership and the rules of engagement.

  44. Truth says

    Jan 14, 2015 at 8:44 am

    As soon as Obama tries to censor someones speech, take him to court on violating the US Constitution.

  45. Gráinne O'Malley says

    Jan 14, 2015 at 8:55 am

    How do you Americans stick this President? He has is own agenda…. so politically correct and sympathetic to Islam and all things islamic to the detriment of other religions and western values. Thanks Robert for enabling me to read Jihad Watch. Vive la liberté!

  46. Judi says

    Jan 14, 2015 at 10:49 am

    America – stand up to this monster masquerading as a president whilst you still can. If 30 million Egyptians could rise up against Morsi and get him to resign, surely 300 million Americans can do the same!!

  47. Lioness says

    Jan 14, 2015 at 12:25 pm

    Obama, like other “moderate” Muslims, supports Jihad by silence. It is no surprise, therefore, that he is against free speech and the criticism of Islam. He has no problem with antisemitism or the fact that Christians are murdered by the thousands. He is only concerned with Muslims’ sensitivities.

  48. Robin Wigginton says

    Jan 14, 2015 at 4:49 pm

    I bet he won’t suggest “Inspire” the jihad instruction/promotion magazine be taken out to protect the public. That would only be logical.

    Nor will he user force to eliminate those that are in the 22 No-Go jihad trainin camps that are in 9 states.

    He’s wanting us to be like lambs to the slaughter……quiet, uninformed & helpless. It’s getting to be more like Nazi Germany every day.

  49. c matt says

    Jan 14, 2015 at 6:32 pm

    I don’t get it – we are over in the middle east at war with muslims, and somehow he thinks a few stateside articles on Mo’s cult in the press are going to “endanger” military lives?!?! Dude, they are already in a WAR ZONE!!!

  50. Mirren10 says

    Jan 14, 2015 at 7:23 pm

    It seems to me your president obama is determined to do as much damage as he can, before he leaves office. A spiteful, little, *little* man. But it is such as he who often carry out the most destruction..

  51. PatnCats says

    Jan 14, 2015 at 10:59 pm

    So how do we enmass – run, walk, drive, fly, or catch the train to D.C. and begin waving signs at him from the sidewalks around the White House?
    ISLAMIC TRAITOR!
    F**K the PROPHET!
    SEDITIONIST!
    FREE SPEECH = FREE AMERICANS!
    Such like that?
    I’ll CURSE MOHAMMAND THE PSYCHOPATHIC PROPHET of islam to the DAY I go to the VA CEMETERY!

  52. Solange says

    Jan 15, 2015 at 12:12 am

    Seems more like an excuse to take away our rights.

  53. roger says

    Jan 15, 2015 at 6:37 am

    Here comes internet censorship.

  54. PJG says

    Jan 16, 2015 at 7:17 pm

    He has moved on from condemning “slander” of “the Prophet”. Now it is “anti-jihad” writing, which basically means “anti-Islam”..
    Using the safety of the US defence forces is a good excuse to shut up critics of Islam.
    How many more years does he have?

  55. William Lucas HarveyJr. says

    Mar 3, 2015 at 7:43 am

    A Reader’s Personal Opinion/Coment:

    Well, Good Luck with that, Mr. Islam Sympathizing, Jihadist Defending, “Imperial” President.

    In exercising my Constitutional and Legal Rights Personally, I WILL CONTINUE, as I HAVE been doing, making my Internet Website Posts, News Media Posts, and Internet Social Media Posts – Opinions, and Comments, all which I have Docuumented for my Legal Protection.

    And in exercising my Constitutional and Legal Rights Personally, I WILL CONTINHUE, as I HAVE been doing, sending them to the White House, the DOJ, the State Department, Law Enforcement, plus the State and Federal Politicians, all which I have Docuumented for my Legal Protection.

    ALL, as I Personally, HAVE been doing, with Detailed Informative Links, and Links to other Articles and Coments.

    However, our “Impetial” Leader, could probably just Invalidate and Abolish the Three Branches of Government (Executive, Legislative, Judicial, which are ALREADY almost only ONE “Branch” – Obama) , as well as “Abolishing” the U.S. Constitution, Civil Rights, Habeus Corpus, et. al. , with one of his Doubtfully Lawful “Executive Decrees”.

    Then on the other hand, “Lawful: would have NO meaning anyway, because he would “Invalidate” Existing Laws, and “Re-Write” them, through another “Executive Degree”.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Michael Copeland on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • Dude on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.