• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Al-Azhar Sheikh: Killers of pilot should be “crucified or…have their limbs amputated”

Feb 4, 2015 9:21 am By Robert Spencer

Sheikh-Ahmed-al-TayebThe clerics do not mention this story from Muhammad’s conquest of Khaybar: “Kinana b. al-Rabi`, who had the custody of the treasure of B. al-Nadir, was brought to the apostle who asked him about it. He denied that he knew where it was. A Jew came (T. was brought) to the apostle and said that he had seen Kinana going round a certain ruin every morning early. When the apostle said to Kinana, ‘Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?’ he said Yes. The apostle gave orders that the ruin was to be excavated and some of the treasure was found. When he asked him about the rest he refused to produce it, so the apostle gave orders to al-Zubayr b. al-Awwam, ‘Torture him until you extract what he has,’ so he kindled a fire with flint and steel on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then the apostle delivered him to Muhammad b. Maslama and he struck off his head, in revenge for his brother Mahmud.” (Ibn Ishaq 515).

“Clerics denounce burning alive of pilot as un-Islamic,” by Sami Aboudi and Suleiman Al-Khalidi, Reuters, February 4, 2015:

DUBAI/AMMAN: Muslim clerics widely condemned the burning to death of a Jordanian pilot by Islamic State, saying such a form of killing was considered despicable by Islam, no matter the context.
Islamic State militants released a video on Tuesday appearing to show captured pilot Mouath Al-Kasaesbeh being burnt alive in a cage. Jordan, which has participated in a US-led military campaign to bomb Islamic State positions, responded overnight by executing two Al-Qaeda convicts on death row.

Egypt’s top Muslim authority, the 1,000 year old Al-Azhar university revered by Sunni Muslims around the world, issued a statement expressing “deep anger over the lowly terrorist act” by what it called a “Satanic, terrorist” group.

The Grand Sheikh of Al-Azhar, Ahmed Al-Tayeb, said the killers themselves deserved to be “killed, crucified or to have their limbs amputated.”

These are Qur’anic punishments: “Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment.” (Qur’an 5:33)

Saudi cleric Salman Al-Odah wrote on his Twitter account: “Burning is an abominable crime rejected by Islamic law regardless of its causes.”

“It is rejected whether it falls on an individual or a group or a people. Only God tortures by fire,” he added.

There is a hadith to this effect: “Narrated ‘Ikrima: Some Zanadiqa (atheists) were brought to ‘Ali and he burnt them. The news of this event, reached Ibn ‘Abbas who said, ‘If I had been in his place, I would not have burnt them, as Allah’s Apostle forbade it, saying, “Do not punish anybody with Allah’s punishment (fire).” I would have killed them according to the statement of Allah’s Apostle, “Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.”‘” (Bukhari 9.84.57)

But as is so often the case with hadith, there is also a contradictory one — supporting the view that these sayings were fabricated by competing factions among Muslims, and have no historical value. Muhammad is depicted as saying that those who don’t answer the call to prayer should be set on fire, along with their houses: “Certainly I decided to order the Mu’adh-dhin (call-maker) to pronounce Iqama and order a man to lead the prayer and then take a fire flame to burn all those who had not left their houses so far for the prayer along with their houses.” (Bukhari 1.11.626)

The Islamic State posted a religious edict on Twitter, which ruled that it is permissible in Islam to burn an infidel to death.

Shocking

But even clerics sympathetic to the jihadist cause said the act of burning a man alive and filming the killing would damage Islamic State, an Al-Qaeda offshoot which controls wide territory in Syria and Iraq, and is also known as ISIL or ISIS.

“This weakens the popularity of Islamic State because we look at Islam as a religion of mercy and tolerance. Even in the heat of battle, a prisoner of war is given good treatment,” said Abu Sayaf, a Jordanian Salafist cleric also known as Mohamed Al-Shalabi who spent almost ten years in Jordanian prisons for militant activity including a plot to attack US troops.

“Even if the Islamic State says Muath had bombed, and burnt and killed us and we punished him in the way he did to us, we say, OK but why film the video in this shocking way?” he told Reuters. “This method has turned society against them.”

Notice that al-Shalabi is saying the burning is “OK” — and yet he is probably familiar with the hadith that seems to forbid it. But al-Shalabi is saying it is acceptable to punish someone “in the way he did to us,” which is based on the Qur’an: “So whoever has assaulted you, then assault him in the same way that he has assaulted you.” (Qur’an 2:194)

So if the Jordanian pilot was considered to have dropped incendiary material on the Islamic State, then they could consider burning him justifiable on Islamic grounds.

SITE, a US-based monitoring service, quoted Abdullah bin Muhammad Al-Muhaysini, whom it described as a Saudi jihadi, as saying on Twitter it would have been better if Kasaesbeh’s captors had swapped him for “Muslim captives.” His killing would make ordinary people sympathetic to Kasaesbeh, he said.

The idea of swapping him comes from this passage: “So when you meet those who disbelieve, strike necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either favor afterwards or ransom until the war lays down its burdens.” (Qur’an 47:4)

Still, some admirers of Islamic State cheered the killing. In a Twitter message, a user called Suhaib said: “To any pilot participating in the crusader coalition against the holy warriors — know that your plane might fall in the next mission. Sleep well!“

The killing was denounced in the Arab press. The pan-Arab Al-Hayat newspaper published the report on its front page under the headline “Barbarity.”

Saudi Arabia’s Arabic daily Al-Riyadh newspaper wrote that the Islamic state had “deepened its savagery and its bloody approach” by burning Kasaesbeh.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, Daesh), Jihad doctrine Tagged With: Ahmed al-Tayeb, Al Azhar


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Angemon says

    Feb 4, 2015 at 9:32 am

    “It is rejected whether it falls on an individual or a group or a people. Only God tortures by fire,” he added.

    What’s implied here is that if the islamic state had killed the pilot in any other fashion, or crucified him, or chopped his hands and feet on opposite sides, the sheik would nod approvingly. Fire is haram, murder is halal.

    • shabeer_hassan says

      Feb 4, 2015 at 11:23 am

      Death punishment for killers: Qisas (i.e. equality in punishment)
      2: 178. O you who believe! Al-Qisâs (the Law of Equality in punishment) is prescribed for you in case of murder: the free for the free, the slave for the slave, and the female for the female. But if the killer is forgiven by the brother (or the relatives, etc.) of the killed against blood money, then adhering to it with fairness and payment of the blood money, to the heir should be made in fairness. This is an alleviation and a mercy from your Lord. So after this whoever transgresses the limits (i.e. kills the killer after taking the blood money), he shall have a painful torment.
      179. And there is (a saving of) life for you in Al-Qisâs (the Law of Equality in punishment), O men of understanding, that you may become Al-Muttaqûn
      17:33. and do not kill anyone which Allah has forbidden, except for a just cause. And whoever is killed (intentionally with hostility and oppression and not by mistake), we have given his heir the authority [(to demand Qisâs, Law of Equality in punishment or to forgive, or to take Diya (blood money)]. But let him not exceed limits in the matter of taking life (i.e he should not kill except the killer only). Verily, he is helped (by the Islâmic law).
      Dawud :: Book 39 : Hadith 4479
      Narrated Abdullah Ibn Abbas:
      Qurayzah and Nadir (were two Jewish tribes). An-Nadir were nobler than Qurayzah. When a man of Qurayzah killed a man of an-Nadir, he would be killed. But if a man of an-Nadir killed a man of Qurayzah, a hundred wasq of dates would be paid as blood-money. When Prophethood was bestowed upon the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him), a man of an-Nadir killed a man of Qurayzah.
      They said: Give him to us, we shall kill him. They replied: We have the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) between you and us. So they came to him.
      Thereupon the following verse was revealed: “If thou judge, judge in equity between them.” “In equity” means life for a life.
      The following verse was then revealed: “Do they seek of a judgment of (the days) ignorance?”
      Bukhari: Book 6: Volume 60: Hadith 25
      Muslim: Book 16: Hadith 4138, 4140, 4142

      • Angemon says

        Feb 4, 2015 at 11:55 am

        shabeer_hassan posted

        “Death punishment for killers”

        Was muhammad killed for murdering the men of the Banu Qurayza tribe?

      • john spielman says

        Feb 4, 2015 at 12:48 pm

        Did you know that according to muhammed ‘s own word, he is in hell fire right now? Vol1, book12 no770 by Abu Huraira. according to the Bible those who are in the fire of sheol will arise on the Day of Judgement ONLY TO BE CAST INTO THE HELL OF FIRE BY JESUS

        • Western Canadian says

          Feb 4, 2015 at 11:02 pm

          fire of sheol??

      • Jay Boo says

        Feb 4, 2015 at 4:13 pm

        @shabeer_hassan

        The reason that Islam is so full of vindictiveness is because it is a bottomless pit of emptiness.

    • Spot On says

      Feb 4, 2015 at 12:11 pm

      Move on, there is nothing here…
      B.O. won’t mention them by name and G.W.B. said Islam is a religion of peace. Clinton openly collected huge fees from them after his reign. i.e. B.O. doesn’t want to be called stupid, G.W.B. doesn’t mind being called stupid, and Clinton just goes for the gold (and the women of course). Truth is that all have serious financial interests with Islamic barbarians so move on, there is nothing here.

    • jule says

      Apr 25, 2015 at 10:16 pm

      I find it more than disappointing that al Tayib/al Azhar calls for either crucifixion or chopping off limbs. This is supposed to be the man In Charge of Reform of the way Islam is Taught! This is supposed to be the one we look to for great change in Wrong Interpretation. It looks HOPELESS.

  2. Don McKellar says

    Feb 4, 2015 at 9:41 am

    Why yes, of course! Islamic logic!

    Okay, that there moslem was burned alive for fighting against other moslems who want to be in charge of us. Therefore, those moslems should be crucified and their limbe amputated. That is the right thing to do.

    Thanks, Santa!

  3. jihad3tracker says

    Feb 4, 2015 at 10:01 am

    Hello to my friends at Jihadwatch — the regulars and the newbies. Some thoughts here, which I hope you will take the time to read :

    For me, IS’s murder of the Jordanian pilot by live-immolation was a personal change point, as the expression goes. Even the beheadings — although I was deeply revulsed by them — did not really do to my ancient brain what seeing a still photograph of that human’s impending death did.

    Perhaps you feel the same way. Until yesterday, I spent perhaps 30 minutes a day, divided into segments of a few minutes each, thinking about Islamic supremacism and its manifestation through jihad.

    Now, and I think evermore in the future, reflections upon jihad will be like a “mental video” always playing quietly just below my conscious mind.

    So here is a suggestion : we know that CAIR and its network of allies read every post here, and they will be in top gear trying to scrub away any connection of IS’s fully-faithful actions on behalf of Allah.

    CAIR will contact media, elected officials, regional TV stations, and who knows what other entities — plus pulling up the usual taqiyya bullcrap liars. Reza Aslan will be a very busy guy.

    My request ? During this weekend, when many more visitors off from our jobs, visit Jihadwatch, and post YOUR recommendations for counter-jihad efforts WHICH ARE FEASIBLE FOR US TO ENGAGE IN.

    Such realistically achievable acts would probably EXCLUDE, for example, standing on a high platform in the middle of your city’s park, speaking loudly on The Religion of Peace. But there are many other ways to help in the cause of counter-jihad. I will comment with two of my own ideas.

    Perhaps we can settle on Sunday as the day to send along those recommendations. Placing them in any post by Robert is OK, I guess, but an obscure one would not be the best choice.

    Thanks for your cooperation on this, and if readers here want to improve the details of my plan, please chime in with your specifics . . .

    • dlp6666 says

      Feb 5, 2015 at 9:22 am

      How about signing this moderately-worded and carefully constructed petition?

      https://www.change.org/p/president-barack-obama-examine-whether-islam-is-antithetical-to-human-rights

      • RonaldB says

        Feb 5, 2015 at 10:41 am

        I’m sorry, Dlp6666,

        I wouldn’t sign that petition if my life depended on it.

        Your heart is in the right place, but the petition is actually a manifestation of what will kill us. That is, a recognition of the right of governments to ban the expression of thought, the supremacy of the European Court of Human Rights, and the validity of UN law over the laws of individual countries.

        Let me explain. It is the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights, and the decrees of the European Union, that makes it illegal for individual countries to close their borders to non-nationals. It is only by withdrawing, or defying, such international bodies, that countries will be able to maintain their own borders and their indigenous culture and people.

        The biggest voting bloc, by far, in the UN is the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, which lobbies assiduously to make criticism of Islam illegal. Signing this petition validates the supremacy of UN laws and rulings. By signing the petition that the UN, and individual governments, have the right to ban an ideology (rather than exclude a class of people from their borders), there is no philosophical or legal defense whatsoever to the exclusion of Islamic criticism from legally protected speech.

        In other words, should the philosophy of this petition become accepted, all that Islamic organizations such as the OIC or the Muslim Brotherhood would have to do would be to complete their co-option of governments, and then declare criticism of Islam to be harmful and malevolent.

        In point of fact, what needs to be done is for individual governments to pull out of organizations like the European Union, the International Court of Human Rights, and the United Nations, and ally themselves in ad hoc alliances to oppose external coercion, such as the NATO invasion of Serbia and Bosnia to prevent the victory of the Bosnian Serbs over the Muslim fighters.

  4. AnneM says

    Feb 4, 2015 at 10:28 am

    Yet was it not Mohammed that allowed for burning one’s enemies in the Koran?

    • shabeer_hassan says

      Feb 4, 2015 at 11:25 am

      Dawud :: Book 14 : Hadith 2667
      Narrated Hamzah al-Aslami:

      The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) appointed him commander over a detachment. He said: I went out along with it. He (the Prophet) said: If you find so-and-so, burn him with the fire. I then turned away, and he called me. So I returned to him, and he said: If you find so-and-so, kill him, and do not burn him, for no one punishes with fire except the Lord of the fire.

      • Alicia says

        Feb 4, 2015 at 11:56 am

        “And then there is this story from Muhammad’s conquest of Khaybar: “Kinana b. al-Rabi`, who had the custody of the treasure of B. al-Nadir, was brought to the apostle who asked him about it. He denied that he knew where it was. A Jew came (T. was brought) to the apostle and said that he had seen Kinana going round a certain ruin every morning early. When the apostle said to Kinana, ‘Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?’ he said Yes. The apostle gave orders that the ruin was to be excavated and some of the treasure was found. When he asked him about the rest he refused to produce it, so the apostle gave orders to al-Zubayr b. al-Awwam, ‘Torture him until you extract what he has,’ so he kindled a fire with flint and steel on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then the apostle delivered him to Muhammad b. Maslama and he struck off his head, in revenge for his brother Mahmud.” (Ibn Ishaq 515)”

      • pumbar says

        Feb 4, 2015 at 10:08 pm

        In the name of Allan, most petulant, most childish, the greatest of decievers.

        Lo! Oh muslims. I (Allan) have brought you the gift of SPAM, both the tinned meat (grill, bake or fry) kind and yet also the copy and paste kind. Thou wilt find SPAM much to thy liking, for verily, it is a gift from Allan and Allan is all knowing, all wise.

        Al-Cohol Baconi 42.345

  5. jihad3tracker says

    Feb 4, 2015 at 11:15 am

    A superb & deeply knowledgeable scholar of Islam — David Wood — currently ( Wed 2/4 ) has a post on ten Qur’anic passages, ones which ISIS bases its conduct on.

    Link to get there : http://www.answeringmuslims.com. The video is just over 8 minutes — he specifies chapters and verses for each quote.

    That video will be a part of two suggestions for personal counter-jihad efforts by Jihadwatch reads — in our discussion on Sunday ( see my earlier post above ).

  6. shabeer_hassan says

    Feb 4, 2015 at 11:33 am

    #, some admirers of Islamic State cheered the killing.

    Fight declares only the people, who come to fight with Muslim:
    Muslim :: Book 1 : Hadith 259
    Jihad declares: polytheists have rebelled [terrorism] against Muslim:
    Muslim :: Book 19 : Hadith 4441 ,4443,
    Muslim :: Book 31 : Hadith 6176
    Jihad ordered who fought and imprisoned others
    Muslim :: Book 19 : Hadith 42
    Jihad declare only the people who broken the agreement/mischief land/terrorism/injustice
    22:39. Permission to fight is given to those (i.e. believers against disbelievers), who are fighting them, (and) because they (believers) have been wronged, and surely, Allâh is Able to give them (believers) victory
    8: 56. They are those with whom you made a covenant, but they break their covenant every time and they do not fear Allâh.
    57. So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.
    58. If you (O Muhammad SAW) fear treachery from any people throw back (their covenant) to them (so as to be) on equal terms (that there will be no more covenant between you and them). Certainly Allâh likes not the treacherous.
    59. And let not those who disbelieve think that they can outstrip (escape from the punishment). Verily, they will never be able to save themselves (from Allâh’s Punishment).
    60: 9. It is only as regards those who fought against you on account of religion, and have driven you out of your homes, and helped to drive you out, that Allah forbids you to befriend them. And whosoever will befriend them, then such are the Zâlimûn (wrong-doers those who disobey Allah).
    42: 42. The way (of blame) is only against those who oppress men and wrongly rebel in the earth, for such there will be a painful torment.
    9: 12. But if they violate their oaths after their covenant, and attack your religion with disapproval and criticism then fight (you) the leaders of disbelief (chiefs of Quraish – pagans of Makah) – for surely their oaths are nothing to them – so that they may stop (evil actions).
    9:13. Will you not fight a people who have violated their oaths (pagans of Makah) and intended to expel the Messenger, while they did attack you first? Do you fear them? Allah has more right that you should fear Him, if you are believers.
    4: 75. And what is wrong with you that you fight not in the Cause of Allah, and for those weak, ill-treated and oppressed among men, women, and children, whose cry is: “Our Lord! Rescue us from this town whose people are oppressors; and rise for us from You one who will protect, and rise for us from You one who will help.”
    5: 33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.
    42: 39. And those who, when tyranny strikes them, they defend
    themselves.[ avenge themselves in a just manner, restoring their rights and not
    3: 111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.
    112. Indignity is put over them wherever they may be, except when under a covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is put over them. This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s disobedience, crimes and sins).
    Dawud :: Book 38 : Hadith 4357
    ……”The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Apostle and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is execution or crucifixion.”
    Bukhari :: Book 7 :: Volume 63 :: Hadith 210
    Narrated Ibn ‘Abbas:
    The pagans were of two kinds as regards their relationship to the Prophet and the Believers. Some of them were those with whom the Prophet was at war and used to fight against, and they used to fight him; the others were those with whom the Prophet made a treaty, and neither did the Prophet fight them, nor did they fight him…….

    • RonaldB says

      Feb 4, 2015 at 4:20 pm

      shabeer,

      Do you have any words of your own, or is the verbal part of your brain fried by reading tthe pointless, self-contradictory ramblings of a babbling, sociopath idiot prophet Muhammad?

      • Jay Boo says

        Feb 4, 2015 at 4:48 pm

        shabeer said
        “……”The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Apostle and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is execution or crucifixion.””
        —————————————————————–

        Which proves just how disgustingly vile is Islam.
        Went you take away the vengeful sociopathic indignation of Muslims trying to earn paradise all that is left is a vanity display. Muslim men lacking the slightest bit of true faith in anything but arrogant bowing displays will always prance about wearing their man-dresses and Kufi Hats while their woman folk tuck themselves in their modesty flaunting hijabs and both are willing to resort to violence if we don’t gush over them in pandering admiration of their pretentious piety.

    • Jay Boo says

      Feb 4, 2015 at 4:45 pm

      shabeer said
      “……”The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Apostle and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is execution or crucifixion.””
      —————————————————————–

      Which proves just how disgustingly vile is Islam.
      Went you take away the vengeful sociopathic indignation of Muslims trying to earn paradise all that is left is a vanity display. Muslim men lacking the slightest bit of true faith in anything but arrogant bowing displays will always prance about wearing their man-dresses and Kufi Hats while their woman folk tuck themselves in their modesty flaunting hijabs and both are willing to resort to violence if we don’t gush over them in pandering admiration of their pretentious piety.

      On a happier note:
      I can absolutely guarantee that Muslims will not understand a word of this song.
      Mahalia Jackson – Oh Happy Day

    • Jay Boo says

      Feb 4, 2015 at 4:47 pm

      shabeer said
      “……”The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Apostle and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is execution or crucifixion.””
      —————————————————————–

      Which proves just how disgustingly vile is Islam.
      Went you take away the vengeful sociopathic indignation of Muslims trying to earn paradise all that is left is a vanity display. Muslim men lacking the slightest bit of true faith in anything but arrogant bowing displays will always prance about wearing their man-dresses and Kufi Hats while their woman folk tuck themselves in their modesty flaunting hijabs and both are willing to resort to violence if we don’t gush over them in pandering admiration of their pretentious piety.

      On a happier note:
      I can absolutely guarantee that Muslims will not understand a word to this song.
      Mahalia Jackson – Oh Happy Day

  7. Alicia says

    Feb 4, 2015 at 12:00 pm

    To those that were not yet certain of Islam’s barbarity, here is Al-Azhar’s top man telling the world that crucifixion is a just form of punishment in Islam.

    • mariam rove says

      Feb 4, 2015 at 1:28 pm

      I am certain os Islam and its barbarity. I was born and raised one. M

    • Spot On says

      Feb 4, 2015 at 3:16 pm

      Nothing new here except TV, I’m sure. This is not unlike their burning of churches, schools, and synagogues with adults, children, and babies blocked inside. They are not that much unlike the cannibals of bygone days, except that cannibals killed their prey first.

      • Bezelel says

        Feb 4, 2015 at 4:34 pm

        It is not unlike burning a that school and purposing trapping the children inside over a dress code. I wish I could find the link to post it.

        • Angemon says

          Feb 4, 2015 at 4:44 pm

          Here you go:

          http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1874471.stm

        • Bezelel says

          Feb 4, 2015 at 6:45 pm

          Angemon, Thanks and here is some more muslim pyromaniacs.
          http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/17/more-muslim-animal-abuse-setting-a-donkey-on-fire-for-fun/
          Pretty damning evidence it seems. Muslim is as muslim does or monkey see monkey do.

        • Angemon says

          Feb 4, 2015 at 6:51 pm

          Bezelel posted:

          “Muslim is as muslim does or monkey see monkey do.”

          IMO, it’s more like “monkey do, muslim see, muslim do”:

          Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 188:

          “Narrated ‘Amr bin Maimun:

          During the pre-lslamic period of ignorance I saw a she-monkey surrounded by a number of monkeys. They were all stoning it, because it had committed illegal sexual intercourse. I too, stoned it along with them.“

        • Bezelel says

          Feb 4, 2015 at 8:45 pm

          Angemon, I had no idea that was a prophetic statement!!! Pre islamic ignorance may have something to do with Post islamic ignorance. Progression does progress either positive or negative depending on how one applies ones self. It does leave more questions about this youtube containing audio of obola relating to a monkey god. Could this be a revelation?

        • Bezelel says

          Feb 4, 2015 at 8:48 pm

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoWWO80AqJc
          obola’s demon fighting monkey god.

      • Spot On says

        Feb 5, 2015 at 7:53 am

        Angemon’s mention of the “Pre-Islamic period” of monkey stoning brings up an interesting subject. Big Mo built his religion within the confines of an already existent ancient barbaric evil culture. Much of this culture is integral with Islam. This pre-Islamic evil culture is acknowledged in various ancient writings. This connection is not often made but Big Mo heralded this evil culture. It is part of Islam.

        Now I learn that he also copied monkeys. (Learning something new every day.) So Islam teaches their kids that Jewish people are monkeys? That figures coming from a bunch of goat molesters.

        • Angemon says

          Feb 5, 2015 at 6:12 pm

          Spot On posted:

          “Big Mo built his religion within the confines of an already existent ancient barbaric evil culture. Much of this culture is integral with Islam. This pre-Islamic evil culture is acknowledged in various ancient writings. This connection is not often made but Big Mo heralded this evil culture. It is part of Islam.”

          Exactly – several islamic practices were done by the pagan arabs. All muhammad did was pretty much say “when they do this it’s pagan idolatry, but when we do it’s sacred and pleases allah” – pilgrimage to Mecca and kissing the black stone, anyone?

        • Bezelel says

          Feb 5, 2015 at 8:28 pm

          I’m having trouble understanding how the man knew what the monkeys were stoning for. Dr Doolittle of the arab world perhaps.

  8. Jay Boo says

    Feb 4, 2015 at 4:49 pm

    test

  9. Mirren10 says

    Feb 4, 2015 at 5:42 pm

    “Even if the Islamic State says Muath had bombed, and burnt and killed us and we punished him in the way he did to us, we say, OK but why film the video in this shocking way?” he told Reuters. “This method has turned society against them”

    This is simply mohammedans being cross because because the IS has , by publishing the video, **made islam look bad**. Otherwise, they couldn’t give a damn.

    if, God forbid, the hideous sunnah of mohammed ever holds sway over the whole world, atrocities such as this will be commonplace, and they won’t even bother to talk about the filming of the video as ‘shocking’.

  10. Salah says

    Feb 4, 2015 at 11:12 pm

    Al Azhar is rapidly losing its prestige and its authority. Egyptian intellectuals are openly and publicly challenging its teachings.

    Here’s a video clip aired on Egyptian TV. There are a LOT of them.

    http://crossmuslims.blogspot.ca/2014/08/cannibalism-in-islam-taught-at-al-azhar.html

  11. gravenimage says

    Feb 4, 2015 at 11:52 pm

    Al-Azhar Sheikh: Killers of pilot should be “crucified or…have their limbs amputated”
    ……………………

    These *are* Qur’anic punishments, and are only to be done against either Infidels or those deemed, though the doctrine of Takfir, to be virtual non-Muslims due to their un-Islamic behavior.

    More:

    The Islamic State posted a religious edict on Twitter, which ruled that it is permissible in Islam to burn an infidel to death.
    ……………………

    “An Infidel”—in other words, these pious Muslims declared the pilot a virtual Infidel for opposing the Islamic State.

    So what we have here is Jihadists declaring *each other* to be insufficiently Islamic, and hence fair game to treat like Infidels—and that means with the most barbaric savagery.

    God, I hate Islam.

  12. BC says

    Feb 5, 2015 at 4:54 am

    I expect the leaders should they ever be captured and tried for their atrocities will try to get captured by Western forces sot hey will get tried by our bleeding heart, namby pamby judicial systems and spend their lives in a comfortable jail cell. No risk of a death sentence. Oh and by the way is not Islam supposed to be so peaceful and loving so how do we get these remarks from somebody who knows Islam intimately

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • job on Gingrich: 2020 Election is the ‘Biggest Theft Since 1824’ – But It’s Even Worse Than That
  • Mauricio on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • sidney penny on India: Police make first arrest for ‘love jihad’ under new law
  • gravenimage on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • gravenimage on Turkey plucked to pieces by Pompeo at NATO conference

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.