This won’t stop the mainstream media/Islamic supremacist/Obama myth-making, but here is yet more evidence that the psychopath who murdered three Muslims in cold blood in Chapel Hill, North Carolina last Tuesday was not motivated by “Islamophobia,” much as the jihad enablers wish that he had been — because hate crimes against Muslims are so very useful to them.
“Everything We Know So Far About The Alleged Chapel Hill Shooter,” by David Mack, Buzzfeed, February 12, 2-15 (thanks to Pamela Geller):
…In a post on Aug. 19, 2010, debating the so-called “Ground Zero mosque” on XDtalk.com, an account that appeared to belong to Hicks posted that he had known “several dozen Muslims” and believed “that they aren’t what most think of them.”
When a user took a poll of the forum, the account that appeared to belong to Hicks voted in favor of a response reading, “I am indifferent about the project itself — I can see the arguments both for it and against it. But this is a free country, and the developers certainly have a right to express themselves.”
The full post reads as follows:
I voted #2 for several reasons.
The first amendment to our constitution guarantees freedom of religion, which takes precedence over any other “feeling” that any of us as Americans may have.
Beyond that though after being in D.C. for a decade and knowing several dozen Muslims for most of that time I can say that they aren’t what most think of them. In fact, I’d prefer them to most Christians as I was never coerced in any way by the Muslims to follow their religion, which I cannot say about many Christians.
While the terrorists who did the 9/11 attacks were Muslims, they were extremists in that faith which isn’t common. I know of many Christian extremists personally, much less the ones we have heard about on the news. People of this country don’t seem to hold that against Christianity though(probably because they’re a majority in this country).
While it may cause problems with those that don’t want it there with vandalizing and such, what if that excuse stopped our forefathers from starting a new nation. Civil rights, suffrage, heck even our own gun rights have been “fought” for at times. On that matter, the vast majority of our own ancestors in this country had to fight for their rights as Americans as most of the ethnic groups in this country were looked down on at some point(some still are).
This country was founded on freedoms, and many forget that one of the biggest freedoms that was fought for was freedom of religion. Then after all was said and done, Americans pushed west and took the lands of the Native Americans, put them on reservations(land that has no use), and stuffed religion down their throat. Their children were often taken from them to be taught Christianity(brainwashed might be a better word). They were not allowed to have their ancestral hair or garments, not allowed to use their given names but had to use the Christian ones assigned to them, and not allowed to speak their native tongue among other things. Funny how during World War 2, the same government that violated the Native Americans 1st amendment rights in the previous century were called upon because of their ancestral language.
With all that being said, I don’t see how anyone who calls themselves American can claim that a Mosque shouldn’t be TWO BLOCKS AWAY from what is known as ground zero.

gravenimage says
Chapel Hill murderer: “Knowing several dozen Muslims…I’d prefer them to most Christians”
………………………………..
And he was, in fact, a supporter of the Ground Zero Mosque.
That won’t stop CAIR from screaming that these murders were all about “Islamophobia”, though.
Angemon says
Precisely, GI. I don’t see this going any other way than the path of the Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown affairs – the narrative is set and will be hammered on and on, regardless of facts, until we’re sick of hearing it. And, after all is said and done, most people won’t know of the murderer’s stance on religion and politics, or that he said he preferred muslims to Christians – all they’ll remember is that he killed muslims and it was a hate-crime, otherwise the media wouldn’t have said so over and over ad nauseum.
Jay Boo says
CAIR is so full of deceit and supremacist loathing against non-Muslims that it is only natural that they view the world with suspicion and out of control paranoia.
They project and assume everyone else is obsessed with hating Muslims.
ronyvo says
Folks: Very briefly:
1- To comment about Islam one MUST know the history of Mohammad and his invented ISLAM.
There are 2 completely different teachings in the short time of Mohammad’s effort to establish a new ‘ religion’.
a) in Mecca b) in Median
In Mecca he started with friendly message by borrowing from the Bible. He was harassed and mocked. So, he fled (Muslims call this movement migration).
In Medina he went on a revenge spree. All those friendly surahs have been abrogated and replaced with those extremely hateful and violent surahs, which we are familiar with now.
2- Must know the principal off the Islamic takkyya, which means deception. This is a tool Mohammad had left for the Muslims to use to spread his evil and Satanic system.
3- To those who mocks Christianity basing on the atrocities committed by the so called Christians, should read the extreme peaceful and loving teachings of our Lord Jesus the Christ.
4- Again, in short:
If a Muslim kills and commit any kind of violence act, is doing that with the blessings of his Allah and Mohammad.
I feel very sorry for Muslims, they are VICTIMS of Islam like every one else.
If a Christian commit any kind of hateful act is a sin, which is punishable ONLY BY OUR LORD JESUS.
5- Islam makes any Muslim a judge (who is infidel) and an executor (kill him/her)!!!!
Robert says
Yes, unfortunately Mohammed was deceived by satan appearing as an angel of light. Which he is able to do and is specifcally mentioned in the Bible. Now satan has a control of the followers of this poor deluded man and of course all those that have followed his teachings, many of which come from the Old Testament and Jewish folklore, and of course additional pieces from various other sources. As we are in end times the Bible also teaches about the dangerous times we are in. So best put on the Armour of God. And hopefully, the love of God will encompass all religions before it is too late.
jihad3tracker says
HERE IS A LINK TO OPINIONS AND WRITINGS OF THE FATHER OF A FEMALE SHOOTING VICTIM :
http://gotnews.com/breaking-read-controversial-op-ed-written-chapelhillshooting-victimss-father-islam-marriage/
READ ALL OF HIS POSTINGS. NOT SURPRISING THAT WHEN WE LOOK INTO THE WEEDS, WITH THE BACKSTORY, ISLAM’S TRUE CHARACTER COMES OUT.
jihad3tracker says
MUSLIM CONGRESSPERSON KEITH ELLISON IS “CONFIDENT” ! ! !
About — guess — that the shootings were about more than a parking space dispute . . .
http://cairflorida.org/blog/keith_ellison_confident_shooting_of_chapel_hill_muslims_wasnt_just_about_a_parking_space.html
HELLO MR. ELLISON AND HELLO NIHAD AWAD. You both follow every post here at Jihadwatch — admit that fact. Is it really so difficult ?
Then perhaps you will grow some balls and actually be able to smile — honesty is an asset.
But, unfortunately, the victim-narrative seems to be evaporating as posts emerge from North Carolina Islam’s demonizers & conspiricists.
This progression of supremacist declarations followed by discoveries of hidden Muslim hatred is why I honestly wonder whether declaring the Shahada is a reliable indicator of IQ.
Steffen Larsen says
I have no idea whether Gotnews can be trusted, but they dug up some strange things on social media
http://gotnews.com/breaking-one-chapelhillshooting-victims-hate-white-people/
Bezelel says
Dr. Abu Salha’s views on Islamic marriage are controversial especially given his role as a MD specializing in general psychiatry.
islamic psychiatrist has to be the oxymoron of the new century. I noticed he that access to guns was the problem at Ft Hood. nidal hassan (another muslim psychiatrist) was basically a victim of the second amendment!!!! WOW it’s all clear now.
Bezelel says
typo: I noticed he (said) that access to guns was the problem at Ft Hood.
M S case says
It would not matter to CAIR, or any other such group ,if the three students had silt their own throats and cut their wrist and bled out…..It still would be muslim hatred by non believers’ That is just the way the wind blows and the blood flows. That is an absolute shame that is the way things work here in this mixed up world of islam today..
Champ says
Chapel Hill murderer: “Knowing several dozen Muslims…I’d prefer them to most Christians”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Criminals are drawn to evil and hate to be exposed …
“Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed.” — John 3:20
sound awake says
there seems to be some kind of love connection between the modern democrat party and islam…aww…
Ed says
I hope Hicks claims self defense.
Liberal gun totting. GZ mosque supporter. Atheist who prefers muslims. BHO taking sides.
Let the show begin.
Jay Boo says
— An atheist who prefers Muslims to Christians
Maybe this guy will make the cover of ROLLING STONE after all.
Wellington says
That’s funny, Jay Boo.
Wellington says
Islam, Agent of Liberty, is both a religion (though an evil one, the only evil one among the major faiths of the world) AND a political ideology. As for your statement that “Our Constitution does not allow for other political ideology…..”, to this I say you are clearly wrong. Both Marxism and fascism are political ideologies that are directly contrary to many of the principles, rights and ideas in the American Constitution but yet they are perfectly legal here in the US. Even during WWII the American Nazi Party (composed of total losers to be sure) was not illegal and even during the Cold War the American Communist Party (led, it seems perpetually, by Gus Hall) was also not illegal.
I do wish folks like yourself, well intentioned though you are, would desist from making statements which are 1) wrong and 2) hurt the anti-jihad cause. Islam is definitely a religion per the First Amendment to the American Constitution. I don’t believe there is a single American judge, at either the federal or state level, who would rule otherwise.
The key to dealing with Islam in America is not to try to outlaw it—–this is a fool’s errand, but rather to describe it properly, like Marxism and Nazism, to wit, a heinous ideology which is inimical to what America stands for at her best. If this occurs, I assure you that Islam will no more need to be made illegal or unprotected by the Constitution than Marxism and Nazism.
Yes, I do wish folks like yourself would read more about basic American law before opining. After all, opining badly, opining wrongly, about Islam in America can only aid, not harm, the worst religion ever developed by man. Reconsider. Learn more.
Arthur says
Wellington,
Although I agree with your assessment of the current legality and classification of Islam, I do not know of any democracy which has survived the assault of Islam without declaring it an ‘enemy of the state’. Do you?
I think your statement, “The key to dealing with Islam in America is not to try to outlaw it…” lacks any compelling rationale or logic. I would agree that the only manner of outlawing Islam in the US legal system would be a constitutional amendment–a difficult hurdle no doubt.
What other ideology has a comparable doctrine calling for some percentage of its community to engage in self-initiated, suicidal, chaotic attack for spiritual reward? I don’t think Nazism nor Communism achieved the afterlife motivation inherent in Islam. So to say that what has worked for Nazism and Communism will work for Islam may be presumptive.
TheBuffster says
Wellington, I agree with you.
What we need to do is fight tooth and nail to maintain full freedom of speech and press and to keep hammering away with the truth. The better we are at telling that truth with intelligence and clarity, well-armed with the facts, the more success we’ll have.
We need to bring the fluffy Muslims to the point where they have to come to grips with the truth, explain just exactly why they think IS and other supremacist groups aren’t really “Islamic”, and create an atmosphere where there’s nothing left to do but grapple with the facts and make a clear and open choice.
I also think we should push for greater protections for those Muslims who want to leave Islam.
Make it as easy as possible for people to apostasize, while making it harder to rationalize away unpleasant facts.
Fighting to raise appreciation for our liberties and to keep them whole, while continuing to improve our knowledge and writing and speaking, and taking every opportunity to speak out is the thing.
Bezelel says
He has been laying the groundwork for a section 8 since August 19 2010. Maybe longer but that’s the date on his declaration of insanity. Personally, I’m not a psychiatrist with diagnostic capabilities. All I can do is generalize and say he’s nuts. Standard issue obola supporter and even that wont help him since he messed with obola’s favorite cause. IT DIDN”T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH islam. That has to have obola scratching his head.
Dave J says
People kill other people everyday, and often over extremely minor and petty disputes, unfortunately.
Just because the victim (s) were religious (of any kind) does not automatically make it a hate crime, unless you can prove that was the primary motivation.
This one sounds so far like another petty dispute/instance of urban insanity. But it will and is being marketed as Islamophobia by people who don’t have the decency or patience to withhold their judgement until the facts are known. The term “hotheads” applies.
David says
It’s hard to know what is true anymore. There’s just so much hate and distrust between East and west that they will both be trying to blame each other and the truth will remain hidden.
Hicks could well have been influenced by recent front page news of burnings, beheadings and the like. We may never know the real truth.
Regardless, in all schools all over the world the oneness and equality of all mankind needs to be taught so that people see each other as members of one human family and treat all life as sacred.
Angemon says
David posted:
“It’s hard to know what is true anymore.”
Not that long ago, you seemed pretty convinced that this was a hate crime.
“There’s just so much hate and distrust between East and west that they will both be trying to blame each other and the truth will remain hidden.”
Yes, Japan and India clearly distrust EU and the US, and the feeling is clearly mutual… sarc. off/
“Hicks could well have been influenced by recent front page news of burnings, beheadings and the like. We may never know the real truth.”
By which you mean that the narrative that you’re trying to sell (that this was a hate crimed triggered by the religion of the victims) has no legs to stand on.
“Regardless, in all schools all over the world the oneness and equality of all mankind needs to be taught so that people see each other as members of one human family and treat all life as sacred.”
Have it start in the madrassas ASAP. The rest of the non-islamic world had been preaching that for a long time, so it’s not us who need to change.
katnis says
@David –
I love your thoughts on being taught about oneness and love for humanity. I wish you were right. I was given this message when I was growing up. It has been a blessing to look at the world with an open mind.
However, as an adult, I see that this is not quite reality. Jews, Christians, Atheists, Agnostics, Pagans, Buddhists, Hindus, etc. can coexist. We can live in the same community and get along. It simply is not possible to throw islam into the mix. It doesn’t work. We see this again and again and again. islam is not compatible with a free society. We have thousands of years of proof. IT DOESN”T WORK. IT NEVER HAS and I DON’T THINK IT EVER WILL.
Demsci says
//”Just because the victim (s) were religious (of any kind) does not automatically make it a hate crime, unless you can prove that was the primary motivation.”//
I completely agree with you Dave J. The first principle in law is “innocent until proven guilty”. Of course HICKS is guilty. But nothing else, not some atheist, or democratic ideology.
Killing Muslims, just because of hate, dislike what their co-religionists do, revenge maybe, or out of some kind of fear? It makes no sense, it is crazy and very counter-productive. If it should exist, which I don’t think it does, it should be dealt with very harshly.
But to equate these killings with some Muslims killing Christians is also wrong. Because the Islamic killers very often clearly do so with Islamic motivation, as pointed out on JW. Mr. Hicks never pointed to any ideology in whose name he carried out the act of killing.
If it was a hate-crime Hicks acted against Islam. But Muslim killers often act FOR Islam. It is to me a crucial difference whether people act against or for something.
Demsci says
Agent of Liberty, I agree fully with Wellington, so outlawing Islam is not quite what I would support.
But, I do think Islam is totalitarian and (therefore) intolerant (and by now the burden of proof is on the Muslims to prove otherwise IMO). And I remember Karl Popper’s dictum; Tolerant people should be intolerant to intolerants. Because the intolerants mean to and could eventually succeed in killing most tolerant laws and customs, in a person’s country. I do believe that modern Germans for that reason are prohibiting a new Nazi party. We can also remind ourselves that: “Our constitution is not a suicide-manifest”.
I remember reading about the attitude of protestants towards catholics in Elizabethan, Stewart, Cromwell, William of Orange, Queen Anne’s and Hanoverian times. The protestants considered the Catholics dangerous because of their preference of the power of the pope over the power of the state. And the protestants suffered the catholics to live and practice I suppose, but also severely limited their civic and political rights, for being Catholic.
I think we now also have the right to ask Muslims if they do or do not “place the Constitution above the Quran”. and let their choice have consequences.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Prez Barack Hussein and Eric The Red are moving in for a federal investigation of this. The prez said, “Nobody should be targeted for how they look, or how they dress, or how they practice religion.” It doesn’t matter what the murderer says, he should shut up and let this be handled by The Narrative as droned by the news entertainment industry.
David says
The truth is none of us really know. And we may never know now because it’s become a political issue. Was Hicks influenced by recent events overseas?
To me he’s either mad or it was a hate crime because he saw all 3 persons as ‘the enemy’ in his mind. What created that frame of mind? If he’s a known psychopath or diagnosed as one that’s different. But if he’s not?
Outwardly it looks a lot like a hate crime. But we might never know now it’s been made political. Politically it’s been judged to have been a hate crime against Muslims.
The President is pushing for this view to be accepted. Either way Muslims in America will be maybe seeking revenge. This could cause problems between black and white if race attacks race over this issue.
America is ready to implode.
Angemon says
David posted:
“The truth is none of us really know.”
Nah, the truth seems to be obvious – it was a feud over a parking space. And I know of this because CAIR is trying to label it as a hate-crime.
“And we may never know now because it’s become a political issue.”
And who tried to make a political issue out of it?
“Was Hicks influenced by recent events overseas?”
Unlikely. He stated his preference for muslims over christians based on those he knew, and he bought the “religion of peace hijacked by extremists” meme hook, line and sink.
“To me he’s either mad or it was a hate crime because he saw all 3 persons as ‘the enemy’ in his mind.”
That’s a big leap in logic. Why couldn’t he be trying to kill the owner of the parking space over the dispute, with the two other victims simply being in the wrong place at the wrong time?
“What created that frame of mind? If he’s a known psychopath or diagnosed as one that’s different. But if he’s not?”
Huh, you don’t need to be a psychopath to murder people.
“Outwardly it looks a lot like a hate crime.”
Only if one focuses on the religion of the victims and ignore what the murderer said about the religion of the victims – he preferred muslims over christians andbelieved the “religion of peace hijacked by extremists” myth.
“But we might never know now it’s been made political. Politically it’s been judged to have been a hate crime against Muslims.”
And it was done so by people trying to further their “in America muslims are being persecuted for being muslims so let’s not look into islamic terrorism” agenda.
“The President is pushing for this view to be accepted.”
True, and given Obama’s record with such actions, it’s more evidence against the hate crime hypothesis.
“Either way Muslims in America will be maybe seeking revenge.”
Nah, they’re too cowardly to do so. But let them try. Let the police capture muslims plotting terror attacks, and let those muslims justify their actions with revenge, and quote form islamic sources to do so.
“This could cause problems between black and white if race attacks race over this issue.”
Race != religion. Any self-respecting black who despises white people because of their alleged racism would despise muslims at least twice as much for the same reason.
“America is ready to implode.”
http://suptg.thisisnotatrueending.com/archive/18577870/images/1333592940055.jpg
Demsci says
David: //’America is ready to implode.”// perhaps you wish!
I am reading a book of Peter Zeihan. Accidental Superpower. He is a specialist in geopolitics. He asserts that due to Shale Oil & Gas revolution, and the fall of Oil prices, and demographic and other reasons, America has a very bright future. For one thing, it might consider to withdraw rather soon from the alliances with Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, not needing them anymore. I believe the Saudi’s too already fear this.
Any way, predictors of doom and downfall have so often proven wrong. Predictors of prosperity and peace also of course, but I think they were more often right. I think that because of all this progress mankind already made in history. Why would it not continue? OK, it might not, but what is more likely? Downfall or bright future? I think the latter, based on history.
As I suspect that Muslims and leftist sympathizers indeed desire, nay try to contribute to, America’s downfall, I suggest they get used to a strong America for a long time to come.
don vito says
These murders have nothing to do with islam.
Baucent says
This senseless murder is a gift to the CAIR and “regain the victim narrative crowd”. Their only regret is that Hicks isn’t a fundamentalist Christian.
Richie says
The leftist media is painting the killer as a ‘right winger’- typical lies of the left.
Richie says
What exactly is a ‘Hate Crime’? I could never figure that one out- One would think all acts of violence are hate crimes, but apparently some lives are worth more than others? Thats the way the left makes it sound . Hate Crime legislation was a product of the left, so the logic behind it eludes me
ApolloSpeaks says
CHRIS HAYES OF MSNBC
completely nailed it: “The Chapel Hill murders were the Trayvon Martin/ Michael Brown moment for the American Moslem community. Indeed, like the killing of Martin and Brown Chapel Hill wasn’t a hate crime.
Also it makes perfectly good sense that an anti-war leftsist nut was inspired by a rightwing Christian pro-war sniper to kill three Moslems point blank with a handgun. /sarc
http://www.apollospeaks.com
http://www.apollospeaks.com
Lesley says
Given the data available (the writings of the shooter, and of the victim and father of victim), it is entirely possible that this was a form of stealth jihad in that they may have purposefully targeted the shooter with egregious behavior in hopes that he would lash out. That sounds far fetched, but their treatment may not have been specific to the shooter, and they may have just been operating with the inconsideration that a supremacist and separatist attitude would naturally produce, and spreading it around to all the kaffir.
If they achieve one-up on the kaffir throughout their daily routine, then their feelings of supremacy seem justified. If they are called out and attacked for their inconsiderate behavior, then it’s a good excuse to play victim and further the political track of the Islamist cause.
Or they may just be terrible neighbors. A neighbor of my in-laws killed another neighbor after years of noise complaints went unresolved. Then the neighbor who killed the noisy neighbor hung himself in a tree in his own yard. Neighbor disputes can get crazy in America.
CAIR and others whining about persecution of Muslims that isn’t supported by data is exhausting. If it’s so bad here, then why aren’t Muslims fleeing in droves to Sharia controlled states? I don’t buy that it’s a hate crime.
JamesonRocks says
I find it no surprise that Hicks prefers moozies over Christians as he certainly seems to prefer violence.
duh_swami says
‘Hate crime/speech laws are insane. Someone wants to punish you for what you think and say. Since Hicks is obviously guilty, what is the point of hate crime or civil rights investigations, except to intimidate the rest of us not to have any impure thoughts and if we express them we can be persecuted.
CAIR and the gang are desperate for authentic Mahoundian victims. Hicks could give that to them, but he apparent;y isn’t going to do it. Without a confession of Islamophobia, there is no hate crime or civil rights violation to consider. it’s all a show for the folks.
ApolloSpeaks says
I’M SHOCKED! SHOCKED! SHOCKED I TELL YOU!
A radical leftist loon preferring Moslems to Christians?
http://www.apollospeaks.com
somehistory says
In this upside down world, the truth is whatever the beast and its supporters wish it to be when it comes to the media and the *authorities* and sometimes, the courts.
The guy was angry about his parking spot being taken…many of us have been there….but he allowed the anger to control his actions and he killed….most of us do not go that far. Most of us just make the best of a bad situation and hope the *neighbor* moves away.
But his actions, because the latest parking spot offenders happened to be muslims, suddenly become an act of hate…not just *hate that someone takes the spot*…of the people personally because they are muslim.
In a world where the beast didn’t have such a large voice, this would be handled as murders of this kind usually are….arrest and trial and probably not mentioned except locally. If he had killed three atheists, three Christians, or people whose religions…if any…were unknown, that wouldn’t be a big issue.
It is truly amazing that…the murderers who belong to islam, as in is, boko h, al q, all say the reason is islam…the reason is, they are muslims, but those who *know all* say, nay, not islam. And those who commit a crime and the victims just happen to be seen hijabing or go mosqueing, the perp can scream from the highest hill that he *likes*…at least, doesn’t hate as much…muslims more than he likes Christians…although in the ramblings attributed to him about the founding and growth of the U.S., he kind of acknowledges that Christianity had a hand in the freedoms sought and preserved…those in the *know* say he did the crime because he hates muslims.
And the reason is: the beast of satan wants it to be that way because it furthers the agenda….force all people to bend the knees to islam and its image, thereby, worshipping satan himself.
Such a twisted world….(Ecc.1:15)…”cannot be made straight”
Dave J says
We should all wait for the facts, anything else is speculation. Talking about you, Obama.
Here’s my speculation: It is possible that the belief of Muslims that they are a “better people” may have contributed to a belief that they also deserve a better parking spot. The arrogance and insolence built into Islam is one of it’s least charming attributes.
When a killer has mental problems it is unwise to hypothesize on their motives.
CarolinaSistah says
This hate crime legislation is ludicrous in my opinion. This man murdered 3 young people in cold-blood. How much more hateful can one get than to take someone’s life!
M S case says
Correct. “Agent of Liberty.. Ihave spouted this over and over to no avail….islam is not and never will be a religion TO ME IT IS JUST A MURDERING CULT the freedoms of which we have been granted are being used by muslims as a license for murder which should be outlawed by our governments.
We are notd authorized by our constitution to commit murder as their constitution (THE KORAN) allows/ So then the Koran should be banned as “THE FINL SOLUTION” outlaw and ban the Koran and islam itself. Lock the doors to the mosques post gards at them and inform any muslim that wishes to stay in our countries to either abide by our laws , leave, or go to prison. BUT DOES ANYONE IN HIS OR HER RIGHT MIND BELIEVE THAT OUR POLITICIANS WOULD PASS ANY LAWS TO ABIDE BY “THE FINAL SOLUTION”. of course not and this solution may be a little harsh. There just might be some moderate muslims out there that just want to live and be left alone but I doubt it because I don’t find them out in the streets and street corners protesting and demanding that rasical islam is not the way they want to live and then do everything within their power to put a stop to it. Neither do I see these muslim countries banding together to fight ISIS and all other radical islamist groups so that makes me doubt the “good muslim” theory. and something else that bothers me also…I don’t see the western countries banding together in a mass coalition to wipe out this hoard either.
The rest of the story is….we just sit back and ……….you know the rest of the story.
voegelinian says
“Just follow linda sarsour on twitter and cair’s pos to ngs on facebook.”
Readers may recall Linda Sarsour from previous Jihad Watch reports:
https://www.google.ca/search?as_q=&as_epq=linda+sarsour&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&lr=&cr=&as_qdr=all&as_sitesearch=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jihadwatch.org%2F&as_occt=any&safe=images&tbs=&as_filetype=&as_rights=&gws_rd=ssl
Not only is Linda Sarsour, by Tweeting and Facebooking, performing that special jihad (to supplement the tried and true Jihad of the Sword, Jihad of the Mouth and Jihad of the Pen) we could call Jihad of the Mouse, she is rolling up her hijab sleeves and taking the camel by the horns (so to speak). According to a New York Times article today:
“Everybody in both families… believs wholeheartedly that this is a hate crime…” said Linda Sarsour, who has acted as a spokeswoman for the families. [emphasis added]
And the article adds that Sarsour went on to say, contributing another presto-log to the fire:
“We’re in a pretty critical juncture when it comes to Americans and Islam.”