Will the purveyors of the “Islamophobia” myth and the promoters of the ongoing spurious and self-defeating “dialogue” take Hajj Saeed to task? Will the Leftists who celebrated the defacing of our AFDI ads calling attention to Islamic antisemitism now acknowledge we had a point? Of course not — but this kind of things shows who is telling the truth and who isn’t. And remember: the day after this sermon, a Muslim went to a synagogue and killed a Jew.
“Copenhagen Imam on Eve of Terror Attack: The Prophet Engaged in War, Not Dialogue, with the Jews,” MEMRI, February 13, 2015 (thanks to Pamela Geller):
Hajj Saeed, Imam of the Al-Faruq Mosque in Copenhagen, Denmark, rejected interfaith dialogue in a Friday sermon delivered on February 13, one day before the Copenhagen terror attacks. Imam Saeed explained that the Prophet Muhammad waged war against his Jewish neighbors in Al-Madina rather than engage in dialogue with them. The sermon was posted on the Internet by the Scandinavian chapter of Hizb ut-Tahrir.
Following are excerpts:
Hajj Saeed: Today, I will discuss the old-new topic of interfaith dialogue. The people responsible for interfaith dialogue want to make all religion equal. They want to equate Truth and Falsehood, between heresy and deception [sic], between the religion of the Prophet Muhammad and man-made laws, legislated by these criminals in order to rule the world.
[…]
Do we Muslims want the United Nations to create charity projects for us? The United Nations and its predecessor, the League of Nations, were established in order to fight Islam, to destroy the State of Islam, and to draw the Muslims away from their religion.
The notion of interfaith dialogue is nothing new. This is a malignant idea of which we must be aware, in order to avoid falling into the traps of Satan and his followers, who advocate such dialogue.
[…]
Our Prophet Muhammad had Jewish neighbors in Al-Madina. Did he call for closer relations, harmony, and dialogue with them, in the manner of the UN and of those who call to reconciliation Truth and Falsehood? Or did he call upon them to worship Allah? When they violated their pledge and did not accept this call – well, you know what he did to them. It appears in his Sira. He waged war against the Jews.
[…]
Do you know what interfaith dialogue means? Simply put, it is the creation of a new religion and of new concepts that will be shared by religions considered to be monotheistic. The purpose is to draw the Muslims away from their true religion.
[…]
All people are called to convert to Islam, and anyone who refrains from doing so, after having been presented with evidence, is an infidel, without a doubt.
[…]
Allah has made laws that regulate our relations with them, if we live in their countries. The so-called interfaith dialogue is not part of these laws. Things are entirely different. There should be an ideological conflict to refute their argument of Falsehood, and to present Islam as alternative to their bogus culture, which has hurled them into the abyss of depravity and corruption, and which has reduced them from humanity to the level of beasts.
Angemon says
And just today I said this to someone who claimed that “all the battles of Muhammad were as a result of continually being pursued and attacked“:
“And what constitutes an “hostility”? Would refusal to acknowledge islam be considered an aggressive action? Because islamic orthodoxy is clear about starting a war. Only the caliph can call for offensive jihad (apparently, muslims weren’t told that the quran only allows fighting in self-defense- go figure…), and he must start by giving his target 3 choices: convert, pay the jizya or fight. The refusal to converting to islam and paying the jizya are, apparently, “aggression” or “hostility”.”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/02/michigan-muslim-asks-people-if-theyre-muslim-stabs-those-who-say-no/comment-page-1#comment-1198998
Been There Got the Tee Shirt says
No no no, they need a jobs program.
katnis says
Ha! Good one
Legion says
It’s time to meet their razzia with a reconquista.
Joseph says
Basically, IT IS EVERYBODY ELSE’S FAULT BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT A MUSLIM.
Neil Jennison says
Main stream Islam.
mortimer says
Living in Denmark, hates Denmark, hates Jews. Calls for warfare against Jews and Danes!
Mordechai Kedar was right: All mullahs should have to submit their sermons to the national police a day in advance.
This guy is clearly preaching sedition and should be kick out of the country.
Been There Got the Tee Shirt says
They could submit a whitewashed version, but the hate would find its way to the surface during the preaching. And I personally don’t want the government involved in any of this, as once politics is involved, we know what would happen.
Like a “Neighborhood Watch” program, how about a volunteer group to attend the Friday “prayers” with a discrete video camera? Target the mosques where the haters are, get the actual videos, and post them?
If these European countries are so eager to restrict speech and punish hate crimes, then use videos for evidence, and yes, get these non-citizen hate mongers kicked out of the country. What to do with the citizen haters is more problematic, but they could be given a choice: face jail time or have a free one-way airline ticket to the islamic country of their choice. Somalia would probably take them for a nominal sum. With no return possible for, say, 30 years.
al says
These so-called religious sermons are nothing but repeating the Koran, the sayings of the Prophet, and recording his deeds. These sermons only high-light the hatred filled mentality of a tribal society. It will not end until the West recognizes the religion of Islam as portrayed by the Mecca period, and understanding that the Medina passages suggesting a more moderate Islam has been abrogated. Anyone quoting passages from the Medina period in order to portray Islam as peaceful is merely practicing Takiyya, and that would include the pres of the U.S.A. Islam does not mean peace-salam- rather, it means surrender to Allah. Having MB members in the White House for tea would be like inviting Nazis into the W.H., to discuss ways of defeating Hitler.
gravenimage says
A minor point, al—it is the Meccan verses that are somewhat more peaceful, and the Medinan verses that enjoin full on Jihad against the Unbelievers.
cs says
So what will happen to this goat fucker?
gravenimage says
Copenhagen imam day before jihad murder at synagogue: Muhammad didn’t dialogue with Jews, he fought them
…………………………………..
And by “fight them” he means, of course, mass-murder them and enslave their women and children. Ensure that any children conceived with sex slaves are raised Muslim. It is no accident that there is not a single Jew left in Arabia.
In fact, one of the last utterances attributed to the “Prophet” was that there should be no Jews or Christians left alive in Arabia.
More:
And remember: the day after this sermon, a Muslim went to a synagogue and killed a Jew.
…………………………………..
This is hardly surprising—Friday after prayers is often the most dangerous time for Infidels in Dar-al-Islam, since so many Kutbahs (Muslim “sermons”) preach violence against the Kuffar.
More:
Hajj Saeed, Imam of the Al-Faruq Mosque in Copenhagen, Denmark, rejected interfaith dialogue in a Friday sermon delivered on February 13, one day before the Copenhagen terror attacks. Imam Saeed explained that the Prophet Muhammad waged war against his Jewish neighbors in Al-Madina rather than engage in dialogue with them. The sermon was posted on the Internet by the Scandinavian chapter of Hizb ut-Tahrir.
…………………………………..
This gives the lie to the apologist trope that Medina *itself* represented some sort of “interfaith dialogue”, where Jews and pagans all accepted the mediation of the “Prophet” in their disputes—that, in fact, they invited the Muslims to emigrate there for this very purpose.
More:
Hajj Saeed: Today, I will discuss the old-new topic of interfaith dialogue. The people responsible for interfaith dialogue want to make all religion equal. They want to equate Truth and Falsehood, between heresy and deception [sic], between the religion of the Prophet Muhammad and man-made laws, legislated by these criminals in order to rule the world.
…………………………………..
Of course, this is crap. While genuine interfaith dialogue looks for common ground—as, say, between Jews and Christians, or between different denominations of Christianity—it *does not* insist that anyone participating give up or compromise their beliefs. Only supremacist Muslims would believe that this is so.
And the reference to “man-made laws”, of course, refers to anything that is not barbaric Shari’ah.
More:
Do we Muslims want the United Nations to create charity projects for us? The United Nations and its predecessor, the League of Nations, were established in order to fight Islam, to destroy the State of Islam, and to draw the Muslims away from their religion.
…………………………………..
What rot. These bodies were created when Islam was well below the radar for most Westerners. But now, in fact, at this point the UN has become dominated by the OIC—Muslim nations. But this represents the “slow Jihad”, and this pious Mohammdan obviously has something faster in mind. And it is only because Muslims feel so emboldened with Western appeasement and weak resistance to Muslim violence that this is so.
More:
The notion of interfaith dialogue is nothing new. This is a malignant idea of which we must be aware, in order to avoid falling into the traps of Satan and his followers, who advocate such dialogue.
…………………………………..
Of course, most Muslims who participate in “interfaith dialogue” do so in order to spread Taqiyya and lure Infidels into a false sense of security—but again, “fast Jihadists” believe that the time for this is past, and that it is time for them to begin their final, bloody push from dominance in the West.
As dangerous as Taqiyya is, it is a back-handed acknowledgment of Infidel dominance. Pious Muslims like this Imam no longer respect or even credit such Kuffar power.
More:
Our Prophet Muhammad had Jewish neighbors in Al-Madina. Did he call for closer relations, harmony, and dialogue with them, in the manner of the UN and of those who call to reconciliation Truth and Falsehood? Or did he call upon them to worship Allah? When they violated their pledge and did not accept this call – well, you know what he did to them. It appears in his Sira. He waged war against the Jews.
…………………………………..
When Muslims feel powerful, the mask comes off.
Before that, you find bullsh*t characterizations like the idea that the Charter of Medina enshrined “interfaith harmony”. This tripe is, actually, very common.
More:
All people are called to convert to Islam, and anyone who refrains from doing so, after having been presented with evidence, is an infidel, without a doubt.
Allah has made laws that regulate our relations with them, if we live in their countries. The so-called interfaith dialogue is not part of these laws. Things are entirely different. There should be an ideological conflict to refute their argument of Falsehood, and to present Islam as alternative to their bogus culture, which has hurled them into the abyss of depravity and corruption, and which has reduced them from humanity to the level of beasts.
…………………………………..
In other words, any Muslim who lives in an Infidel nation should be waging violent Jihad. Certainly, this pious murderer who shot up the cafe and synagogue in Copenhagen took this very much to heart.
Bonasi says
Just kick out that imam.
Lesley says
Relax, everyone… All the jihadis need is a job fair and some free stuff, and they’ll settle down.
Jihadi approaches a booth at the job fair. “What is your prior work experience?” asks the worker at the booth.
“Hm,” the jihadi thinks as he twirls his fingers in his overgrown hate beard. “Well, in my last position, I was in charge of smuggling weapons, unless the executioner had a cold. In that case, I had to stand in and cut the heads. I also made change for customers at the sex slave market.”
“We can put that down on your resume as logistics and retail experience,” the worker says with an understanding smile.”
bill says
Reminds me of the day, when I thought about committing suicide.
Before doing so, I called a suicide hotline, and was connected to someone inn Pakistan, who was manning the hotline.
When I told him about my wanting to commit suicide, he asked me “If I could fly a plane”
katnis says
If you read the words in the above article, you may understand why islam is so effed up. The imam spouts lies, calls for violence, and urges his people not to engage in adult conversation. Why is this speech not terrorism in itself?
Rob Crawford says
Clearly he misunderstands Islam. No doubt he was fired before the week was over.
/sarc
Maronite Warrior says
This is the most truthful moslem on the globe
He is criti8sing the UN
I would like him to go and preach the truth to a congregation Of Western Leaders
mortimer says
Your comment is perceptive! He’s as truthful as Anjem Choudary who exposes Islamic doctrines so clearly they sound like he and Robert Spencer are reading from the same book! (Which they are…the Islamic Trilogy).
Bezelel says
(All people are called to convert to Islam, and anyone who refrains from doing so, after having been presented with evidence, is an infidel, without a doubt.)
So say’s the supremacist hate monger. obola should invite him to a beer summit and explain to him that he misunderstands islam.
PAthena says
“All people are called to convert to Islam, and anyone who refrains from doing so, after having been presented with evidence, is an infidel, without a doubt.” What evidence?
Salah says
“..and which has reduced them from humanity to the level of beasts.”
The Islamic level of beasts…
“There is no punishment for having intercourse with a dead woman or with an animal because, of course, their vaginas are not desirable.”
(Nawawi, 1/316)
http://crossmuslims.blogspot.com/2010/03/necrophilia-in-islam-necrophilie-en.html
Baucent says
This is very interesting as it exposes the contempt that many muslims have for this very “Western humanistic” notion of “interfaith dialogue”. As if muslims must lower themselves to come to the table as equals to Christians, Buddhists and Hindus. When their religion teaches them that only Islam is true, so all others are corrupt, false and Satanic.
The leaders of Christian churches need to wise up fast, they cannot reason with the unreasonable. They cannot be brothers with those who regard them as dogs.
mortimer says
“Mohammed didn’t dialogue…he made war on the Jews.”
1) Why dialogue when you want to increase the hatred of the ‘other’ in order to militarily attack him and his family?
2) Muslims call atrocities (the beheading of 800 disarmed men) ‘making war’.
Conclusion: the mullah is preaching jihad and motivation for jihad. Their is no dialogue needed when the goal is warfare, atrocities, enslavement, genocide and ethnic cleansing.
mortimer says
RF wrote: “Will the purveyors of the “Islamophobia” myth and the promoters of the ongoing spurious and self-defeating “dialogue” take Hajj Saeed to task?”
Answer: No. They are IDEOLOGICALLY disarming the West and preventing knowledge about the JIHAD DOCTRINE which is the prime directive of Islam. No jihad: no Islam.
The Islamic doctrine is actually very simple under it’s subterfuges. The goal of Islam is world conquest by every means. Deception and ideological disinformation are PRIMARY methods of prosecuting jihad.
CAIR and other professional disinformation purveyors are prosecuting jihad IDEOLOGICALLY.
Thor says
The Muslim world is full of creatures like this. They are all over the internet and their rhetoric is very similar to the speeches of Hitler.