When this murder initially happened, I received this Tweet from a certain Jawad Rasul. It said:
Thank You @pamelageller and @jihadwatchRS, If you have any humanity, you might ponder over this! nyp.st/phBJuX via @newyorkpost
The link went to a story about a murder in New Jersey. Why were Pamela Geller and I being blamed for a murder when we obviously had nothing to do with it or any other murder? The answer was obvious: Islamic supremacists never miss a chance to position Muslims as victims so as to deflect attention away from jihad terror and try to place Islam and the Muslim community beyond reasonable scrutiny. Not only did I receive Jawad Rasul’s Tweet, but also a well-placed source told me that Ibrahim Hooper, Honest Ibe himself, of Hamas-linked CAIR was “salivating and waiting to jump all over” the murder story. “They are waiting to blame you for everything.”
In CAIR’s world, as I noted here, my work exposing the activities of Islamic jihadists and the ways in which they use Islamic texts and teachings to justify violence and supremacism constitutes “hate” and “incitement to violence.” The goal of Hamas-linked CAIR and other Islamic supremacists is to demonize us and thereby shut us up, so that the jihad can proceed unchallenged. The unscrupulousness and mendacity of such charges only indict those who make them.
Anyway, in the New Jersey case, the Muslim who initially blamed the murder of his wife on “Islamophobia” has just been found guilty of that murder.
“Husband who tried to claim racist gunmen killed his wife in front of their son while yelling ‘terrorist’ is guilty – after cops found his MISTRESS was the gunman,” Daily Mail, February 26, 2015:
A New York City man was convicted Thursday of setting up the fatal shooting of his wife while the couple was on a walk with one of their young sons in New Jersey.
A jury deliberated for four hours before convicting Kashif Parvaiz of scheming with his girlfriend to kill his wife and make it look like a random attack.
The August 2011 shooting occurred while Parvaiz and his wife, 27-year-old Nazish Noorani, walked with their son near her family’s home in Boonton, a New Jersey suburb about 30 miles from New York that is home to a large Pakistani-American population.
Noorani was killed, Parvaiz was wounded and the boy was unharmed. The couple’s other son was with family members in the house.
‘Nothing will ever restore Nazish to her family. As her two young children grow up, they will never have their mother by their side. Her family, and most especially her siblings, will never see her again,’ Morris County Prosecutor Fredric Knapp said in a statement. ‘This verdict, however, demonstrates to all of her loved ones that justice has been served.’
Antoinette Stephen pleaded guilty to murder and other offenses and testified against Parvaiz. The Billerica, Massachusetts, resident was having an affair with Parvaiz and admitted firing the fatal shots.
Parvaiz first told police that his family had been attacked by a group of men who called them terrorists and suggested that it was a bias crime, prosecutors said. Noorani was originally from Karachi, Pakistan.
Stephen and Parvaiz exchanged text messages in the days leading up to the shooting, according to an arrest affidavit released by the Morris County Prosecutor’s Office.
‘You hang in there. Freedom is just around ur corner,’ read one text sent from a phone listed to Stephen’s father to Parvaiz, according to the affidavit.
Subsequent texts from Stephen’s number describe driving around the neighborhood to see how far away the nearest police station was, according to the affidavit. The exchange of texts continued up until 2 p.m. on the day of the shooting, authorities said.
According to Morris County Prosecutor Robert Bianchi, Parvaiz’s accounts of the attack were inconsistent and immediately raised suspicions.
Parvaiz told investigators the couple was attacked by a different combination of black and white males who shouted ethnic slurs, authorities said. In his initial story, the group shouted something about the family being ‘terrorists,’ authorities said.
Bianchi said investigators were deeply concerned when Parvaiz suggested it was a bias crime, but within hours ‘it was obvious to investigators that this was sadly the alleged handy work of the victim’s husband who allegedly did the unthinkable and plotted to murder his wife.’
Nazish Noorani lived in fear of her abusive husband as their marriage crumbled and chillingly foretold of her fate to her brother.
In a text to him she wrote: ‘I dont no wht to do. Cant talk to him cuz he abuse me than … he doesnt wanna live with me … i dont no kids get scared of him sometimes … im so tired of this … i dont no Im scared …someday u will find me dead because its cuz of kaski … he wants to kill me.’ …


Beagle says
I still remember the Democrat attack dogs blaming Benghazi on a video and then blaming you and Pamela for the video.
The Muslim Brotherhood front groups and the White House, but I repeat myself, are very unhappy about truth seeping out.
What percentage of initially reported hate crimes turn out to be fake? I would guess over 50% and over 80% on college campuses.
The Doctor says
I know the idea of a “hate crime” is not popular, but please read this post before judging me…
A “hate crime” or “bias crime” is something that is abhorrent to any decent human being – to commit a crime simply because of some specific non-violent characteristic of a person (often beyond the person’s control such as race) is seen as being about as low as one can sink (other than paedophilia). Just like blasphemy in a religious society, a hate crime in a secular society is seen as one of the basest of evils, an affront to civilisation itself. Therefore, laws criminilising such things become weapons and cover. People lie about hate crimes often. I suspect that more “hate crimes” are fabricated than are real. Similarly, “blasphemy”, in countries with blasphemy laws, is a charge used as a weapon more often than a legitimate charge (ignoring for the moment that no-one is actually harmed by blasphemy and thus it should not even be a crime).
In a civilised society that seeks to bring aid and succor to victims, and that desire to aid is often proportional to the baseness of the crime, fabricating a story of something truly horrendous such as rape or a “hate crime” is a clever way to bias people in your favour when making accusations.
Rape is a SERIOUS and horrible crime, and I firmly believe that it should be punished with extreme prejudice, but it is another charge that is often bandied about falsely with malicious intent to destroy a person’s reputation. While charges are often brought to public light in the media, how often is the exoneration of the accused proclaimed with the same fervour?
Our culture has a few bugs in it for sure and is in need of some repair, but I assure you that Shari’a, which codifies and blesses rape, sexual slavery, misogyny, and severe discrimination on the basis of religion is _not_ the answer. The only people who think it is the answer are Muslims who stand to gain from it – free access to steal non-believers’ possessions, wives, children, etc., while living in an “Islamic paradise” where only non-Muslims do any productive work.
Think about it – an Islamic society would collapse without non-Muslims. They _need_ infidels way more than we need them.
Beagle says
I do not have a problem with sentence enhancements for bias crimes which are actually crimes.
I have a huge problem with charging ‘racism’ (examples: quoting Winston Churchill or noting Islam has a doctrine of warfare against kuffar) as a stand alone thought crime.
It should be noted frequently that in cases of first degree murder it is legally impossible to enhance the sentence unless we get creative with prison conditions and means of execution. So in this case a hate crime law would not have made any difference.
And yes, canonical Islam relies on non-Muslims for slaves, jizya, and war booty among other things.
And yes, Islam demeans critical honest work. Muhammad is quoted saying he came for jihad and not farming, paraphrasing. If he is the uswah hasanah and Islam triumphs, in theory a perfect Islamic world starves to death or reverts to hunter-gatherer existence.
The Doctor says
It would be interesting to watch a truly Islamic society try to survive without the civilised world.
Actually, if it were not for the human suffering of innocents (e.g. those born into the crumbling society with no way to escape), it would be down-right entertaining to watch.
And on that depressing note, I bring even worse news. Leonard Nimoy, famous actor and Jew, died today. He is survived by two children (Adam and Julie) and his wife (Susan Bay). He lived “long”. May he now prosper in the afterlife.
Wellington says
Respectfully, Beagle, I do have a probem with sentence enhancements for bias crimes. Doing so punishes motive, which should not be punished, rather only the act should.
If you have sentence enhancements for so-called bias cirmes this creates an inequality in the law for victims of non-bias crimes. If Person A is beaten to a pulp by three thugs who don’t like his race or his sexual preference and Person B is beaten to a pulp by three other thugs who want his money, how does it protect Person B’s equal rights under the law if the thugs who beat him to a pulp are each sentenced to 5 years imprisonment but the the thugs who beat Person A to a pulp are each sentenced to 8 years imprisonment?
My strong conviction is that motive should never be punished, only the act. Another dismal result of pushishing motive is that it gets the government even more involved by having to have government decide what constitututes a bias crime and what doesn’t. Just more social engineering which isn’t needed. Nor is it wise. Motive is important for investigative purposes of course, but it should be irrelevant where punishment is concerned.
Hope you and yours are doing well. Take care.
RonaldB says
Right on, Wellington. The purpose of laws is to provide a certain security protection for the individual and to provide an imperfect, but consistent, justice for victims. Indeed, if an individual is physically injured, what is the justice if the attackers receive punishments based on their supposed motive, rather than the injury done to the victim?
The chance of being caught, and the punishments involved, should serve to deter potential criminals. They don’t, of course, but they should bring crime down to a tolerable level. If, however, you devote extraordinary resources to prosecuting the “hate” crime, you lower the probability of catching and convicting the “non-hate” offender.
So, having hate crimes actually increases the amount of injustice: it makes different penalties for the same degree of injury, and it shifts police resources away from a victim who isn’t lucky enough to be targeted for purposes of race. And, it also implies that if the laws aren’t stringent enough to discourage injury, period, the penalties are not strong enough in general. In other words, adding a “hate crime” component may cover up the fact that the penalties for a particular crime are not sufficient.
And we’re not even talking about the potential for suppression of free speech. Someone espousing an unpopular opinion is subjected to enhanced penalties at the discretion of authorities, for any violation in the book.
Beagle says
Good points, Wellington. I do not disagree.
Sentencing for particular offenses is already unequal due to a host of factors from criminal history (reasonable) and prosecutorial discretion (less) to the mood of the judge (not).
I have seen the book thrown at a teenager for a joint in a car ashtray. In the same county a judge gave undeserved leniency to a young couple trafficking a pound of marijuana. I suspect bringing their baby to court made the difference.
I would argue a bias crime suggests a dangerous animus which presages likely recidivism and possibly escalation. But most serious criminals reoffend anyway.
Much more clear is that authoritarian punishment of speech and thought crimes creates an Orwellian police state. That was my emphasis. I should have at least noted each particular crime victim is similarly violated whatever the mental state of the defendant.
Enhanced sentencing creates an incentive for victims and prosecuters to claim bias whether it exists or not. Like any legal tool in the kit, attorneys will try to use it even when inappropriate.
Beagle says
I hope this link works because the Ibn Kathir quote showing jihad comes before farming is one (of many) great example(s) of Islam being destroyed if it manages to actually win and subjugate the world.
https://books.google.com/books?id=-pvZmoOtrpsC&pg=PA52&lpg=PA52&dq=Ibn+Kathir+jihad.farming&source=bl&ots=18ZCWGIl30&sig=kmfNxE0iplEuO2wS–3H_ECQrhE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3bvwVNvHBdCqyASM8IHYCA&ved=0CDIQ6AEwBg
jihad3tracker says
Hello again Beagle —
Your remarks are a good opportunity to mention an “Ah ha !!!” moment of lucidity that my ancient brain had recently . . .
Perhaps this has already occurred to you and many others reading Jihad Watch, but I’ve overlooked the posting :
EVERY ONE OF THE 22,000 VERIFIED ACTS OF REPRESSION AND VIOLENCE IN THE NAME OF ALLAH WHICH MUSLIMS AROUND THE WORLD HAVE COMMITTED ********** ARE HATE CRIMES ************
Let’s keep that in mind when CAIR and slime bucket taqiyya frat boys rev up their whining. When one goes beyond those nice Five Pillars into the realm of jihad, Islam is the Grand Champion of Hate.
Beagle says
Not to mention the hate speech in the Quran. Being last in time, and full of bigotry against non-Muslims, only the Quran can and does express hate for Jews and Christians.
Clearly the Torah and NT never reference future Muslims in any way.
One could say Islam is the Religion of Hate.
Ricky Black says
thank God the truth will come out. thank God there are still people in USA that want to know the truth.
mariam rove says
Don’t worry. Wait until sentencing. he is looking at 50 to 70 years in prison. Once sentenced I am sure CAIR and the rest of are going to cry foul as has sentenced to harsh because he is a muslim.m
Don McKellar says
Gee, maybe Jawad Rasul needs to be tweeted by a few people about this story so he might shut the hell up next time? Or has he run off to join ISIS already?
Bezelel says
It seems that Noorani was phobic although for just cause. We shall all wait for an apology from from Mr Hooper’s false accusations.
Timothy 2:This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. 2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers,(false accusers), incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
Jay Boo says
He will have much time to reflect upon such things.
—————————
ISLAMIC PRAYER TIME
In the quiet moments and in the gentle solitude of a late evening Muslim prayer, it returns yet again at those times when no other is near, when neither a cricket nor even the whisper of a peaceful breeze dare disturb the recurring terror that lurks in the cruel night of a Muslim’s darkness, as if unaware.
It is the ever present reminder of the painful futility that comes from living within Islam’s disgrace, while bowing to willful ignorance and shamelessly flaunting submission to fear.
Bezelel says
JB, By the end of the day they will have swept so much under the rug that they pray on that it will spill out and who knows when.Their biggest fear would be to meet themselves.
Angemon says
The leftist narrative will probably go like this:
“It doesn’t matter how or why this woman died. What matters is that there are thousands and thousands of women being killed, or in risk of being killed, like this. We must combat islamophobia wherever it exists”.
Jay Boo says
Angemon
Sadly true, that leftist narrative you mentioned has a way too familiar ring.
In spite of that though, this (carpet-kissing) killer husband has pulled out the rug just a bit from the Islamophobia vultures.
Heather says
Should read ‘We must combat Islam wherever it exists’ seeing as Islamophobia is a nonsense.
Georg says
“…Honest Ibe himself…”
Priceless. I’m assuming JAWAD RASUL, the simpleton bigot, has apologized.
somehistory says
OT
On FOX last night, The Factor host was talking about the Christians being killed by is and Franklin Graham was guest. He said the mb (if I am remembering correctly, he indicated muslims with ties to terror) were “in the halls” of the government and O’Reilly said he hadn’t heard that, wanted names, etc. Graham said he didn’t know any names, but would get them. He should ask Mr. Spencer or one of the others ( McCarthy, Emerson ) who have the lists of such individuals.
Some people just don’t pay enough attention to what is going on, so they ask the same questions, make the same wrong statements as *fact,” etc and have a popular forum for such.
Judi says
O’Reilly didn’t know the names? I live in the UK and off the top of my head, I could roll out a few names!
Charli Main says
He could claim to be a ” born again ” Muslim and walk out of court a free man.
Oopps—- that defence only works in British courts—–so far.
vlparker says
I wonder how long it will be before Obama arrogates the power to pardon state crimes and pardons this guy. After all, the Islamophobia of Mr. Spencer probably drove the poor guy insane.
mortimer says
Spencer wrote: “The unscrupulousness and mendacity of such charges only indict those who make them.”
TAQIYYA…verbal jihad to repress the free speech of kafirs and then exploit their consequent unpreparedness and gullibility. TAQIYYA is the main job of CAIR…a jihadist PR firm.
CAIR is a play on the Arabic word ‘khair’ (a good thing=Islam). This is a sly quote of a hadith: “Whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day let him speak good (khair) or remain silent.”
CAIR was set up to promote censorship and offer one-sided message that promote Islamic supremacism and suppress information and facts about the world-conquest philosophy of Islam called ‘jihad’.
Champ says
Why were Pamela Geller and I being blamed for a murder when we obviously had nothing to do with it or any other murder?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The mohammedan-mindset is oftentimes twisted and evil and an impossible chore to unravel and effectively address; so suffice it to say, Pamela and Robert are convenient targets, and they got caught in this mohammedans convoluted web of lies and Craaazy-thinking!
No Fear says
And Robert waits for an apology tweet ……{crickets chirping} …..
Sam says
Robert. don’t worry all those muslims and their supportes will apologize to you when they see their errors of judgement about Islam. I am talking about afterlife ofcourse.
On a serious note, has any muslim ever apologized to you admitting that his/her view of Islam was wrong?
I am gonna bet a “NO”
gravenimage says
New Jersey Muslim guilty of murder that was initially blamed on “Islamophobia”
…………………………..
This is *not* the first time this has happened. Remember this appalling case from California, where an Iraqi Muslim got tired of his child bride after she grew up and developed a modicum of self respect and considered leaving him? He murdered her and blamed it on “Islamophobes”:
“California: Muslim husband to stand trial for murder of wife initially blamed on ‘Islamophobia’”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/07/california-muslim-husband-to-stand-trial-for-murder-of-wife-initially-blamed-on-islamophobia
Nor is this the first time that fake victim-mongering Taqiyya artists like Jawad Rasul have tried to blame the murder on Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller—Raza Aslan did exactly the same thing in the Shaima Alawadi case. This would be grotesque enough in any case—neither of these two decent people have ever advocated any kind of violence. And then, this turned to be another case of murderous *Muslim* violence.
Needless to say, no apologies will be forthcoming…
duh_Swami says
Murder seems like a hard way to get a divorce when all he had to do was say ‘talaq’ 3 times and throw the ungrateful woman into the streets, and move his girl fried in.
Legion says
If this wasn’t so pathetic it would be hilarious.
BC says
If these abused wives go to a sharia court for justice they are told to go home and try to be a better wife