• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK: Muslims threaten female army cadets with beheading

Feb 7, 2015 10:07 pm By Robert Spencer

Threatened cadets with beheadingAt the rate Britain is going, soon David Cameron will be ringing up these two gentlemen, apologizing for inconveniencing them, and presenting these two girls for beheading.

“Girl cadets threatened with BEHEADING by two men as they left an Army Reserve Centre,” by Hannah Parry, Mailonline, February 6, 2015 (thanks to John):

Police have mounted uniformed patrols around an Army Reserve after two girl cadets were threatened with beheading as they left the centre.

Two men had shouted the violent threats as they drove past the teenage cadets, who weren’t in uniform at the time.

The pair, driving in a Vauxhall Zafira, were said to have asked the girls if they were in the army before threatening them with beheading.

Police have traced the car, which is left-hand drive and appears to have foreign plates, and were trying to establish the identity of the occupants.

The driver was described as black or Asian, in his 40s, and of plump or muscular build with a black bushy beard and wearing dark clothes.

Clearly a Presbyterian.

The passenger was also said to be black or Asian, in his 30s, and had short black hair and stubble.

It comes weeks after British police forces warned officers not to wear uniforms on the way to work after an ISIS-style plot to kidnap and behead an officer….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: death threats, Featured, Jihadist intimidation and thuggery, United Kingdom Tagged With: Army Reserve Centre, Vauxhall Zafira


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Kathy Brown, Esq. says

    Feb 7, 2015 at 10:17 pm

    Well there you go! They were warned and still they had the barefaced gall to be in the Army!

    I must disagree with Robert here tho’. It wouldn’t be enough-not nearly enough-for Cameron to ‘deliver the two girls for beheading’. That’s just a piecemeal solution. No: To show sufficient diversity, the UK must utterly disband their Armed Forces and convert, en masse, to the religion of ‘bushy-bearded Asians’.

    • Georg says

      Feb 7, 2015 at 11:58 pm

      Get off your high horse.

      -POTUS

    • paul says

      Feb 8, 2015 at 12:12 pm

      i used to do the Amy Cadet Force AFC run most weeks for my girlfriends son and his friends,,on cold dark nights i would encourage them to..keep going..they all turned out fine young me..my ‘girl friends’ son was made platoon Sargeant..6ft lad..he was walking alone one day a gang set on him and beat him unconscious ..it was just before 9/11..there were a mix of enthnic lads involved..he wasn;t the same after..
      he tryed to join the Army..but it did something to his brain…he was;t fit..he such an intelligent lad before..they get called all shorts by jellous people
      their troop won the best national troop.award one yr ..they go out competing with other troop commands nationaly where team work counts for 2 days in all weathers..doing night manovers…just thought i would share this..bitter sweet..

      • ECAW says

        Feb 8, 2015 at 12:31 pm

        Very sad.

        Read this and weep. What would Montgomery have thought of all this?

        http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11398967/Huge-crowd-of-Muslim-protesters-picket-Downing-Street-to-protest-at-Charlie-Hebdo-cartoons.html

        • jayell says

          Feb 8, 2015 at 2:46 pm

          I’ve looked at this and it’s PATHETIC. What is the point of making a damned nuisance of yourself like this over an event in France?. I note the content of a leaflet they were distributing…

          “Such actions are deliberating insulting and provoking to Muslims worldwide as British citizens, we believe that these publications will continue to ‘sow the seeds of hatred’ and damage community relations.”

          Right, so let’s get this straight.
          1. These bigoted idiots really do believe that they have some ‘Allah-given’ right not to be criticized or even ‘insulted’ ( as they seem to see criticism) in a free society? Or they want to control the whole show, more like? That’s NEVER the way it has been in the UK, if these cretins had bothered to notice. If they feel aggrieved, the correct course is through the courts.
          2. British citizens have until now long had a reputation for being calm, restrained and civilised, not given to the sort of brainless hysteria we see here. How dare theses numbskulls call themselves ‘British Citizens’ when they do not in any way reflect the character and values of REAL British citizens. I completely disown them and in no way whatever support them.
          3. “We believe that these publications will continue to ‘sow the seeds of hatred’ and damage community relations.” Right, so I suppose gratuitously abusing thousands of our vulnerable girls around the country, causing death and destruction in our capital as well as wasting money and our police and security forces’ time in foiling other such outrages, decapitating our soldiers on OUR streets, abusing our soldiers recuperating in hospitals and verbally abusing our cadets in public, being verbally extremely offensive in public demonstrations, introducing barbaric practices into our country and expecting us tolerate it, assuming un-British modes of dress in public that they KNOW is offensive, demanding special treatment that they no way deserve, and generally doing all they can to be a pain in the rear, then insulting our intelligence by claiming that all these obscenities ‘are not Islam’ when we all know full that THEY ARE, all this is somehow NOT “sowing the seeds of hatred’ and damage community relations.”? I’ve never heard such arrogant, bigoted hypocrisy in all my life before.

          ‘Community Relations’ between Muslims in the UK and the rest of British Civilised Society effectively do NOT exist, so these idiots need not concern themselves about damaging what they have already destroyed.

        • ECAW says

          Feb 8, 2015 at 2:56 pm

          Did you notice the not very veiled threat?

          “Be careful with Muhammad”

        • ECAW says

          Feb 8, 2015 at 3:10 pm

          We need to open a book on what finally causes the British to snap and respond appropriately (if they ever do):

          Free speech curbs 5 to 1

          Atrocities 4 to 1

          Rapes 7 to 1

          No go zones 10 to 1

          Insults to our traditions 5 to 1

          Economic drain 6 to 1

          Subversion of schools 10 to 1

          Traitorous politicians 8 to 1

          What have I missed?

    • M S case says

      Feb 8, 2015 at 5:54 pm

      Kathy.. that looks like what’s on the way the all the west if going………

      • M S case says

        Feb 8, 2015 at 6:03 pm

        Kathy Try that again…It looks like all the western world is going that way

        • Bettina says

          Feb 9, 2015 at 11:55 pm

          Yeah, MS, you had me wondering there, for a minute…

  2. Georg says

    Feb 7, 2015 at 11:54 pm

    Now, now. White people, America and Christianity are just as or more eviler, too.

    -POTUS

    • Joseph says

      Feb 8, 2015 at 1:56 pm

      Yes George we Christians are a nasty bunch. I will help you when you are in trouble, feed you when you are hungry and comfort you when you have sorrow. I will also show you how you can have eternal life with JESUS CHRIST in heaven. If you want to follow him that is your choice(shame on me). I won’t harm or kill you for it.

      In this world good is evil and evil is good, so in reality, so far as “world-speak” goes; YOU ARE CORRECT.

    • torino390 says

      Feb 9, 2015 at 8:43 am

      what’s the matter with you? what are you talking about? so, if everyone is evil, they somehow cancel each other out and everything becomes ok? what kind of logic is that? please explain as I sure as hell don’t understand your point.

  3. Fred says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 2:35 am

    It is a dutch car. You can find the data about the car in the automated system https://ovi.rdw.nl/

    The data about the owners aren’t there, because of privacy laws. Privacy laws are a strange phenomenon in Holland. Names and adresses of victims are all over in newpapers but agressors are only shown with their initials. Privacy laws nowadays protect the rights of criminals in the Netherlands.
    This is mainly because of once left wing social-democratic parties like PVDA and Groenlinks.

    Nowadays these parties are strongholds for many militant muslims and they want to “renew” the state, press laws through parlement boycotting Israel and say we have to accept “multiculture”, which practically means islamitic monoculture.
    Anybody criticising these fanatics are called “Nazi’s”, “racists”, fascists” and “mindless scum”.
    What happens in England is also happening in the Netherlands, France and Germany.

    On important aspect is the recession that continues after 2008. A lot of money to subsidize the endless amount of “left wing” hobbies is finished. Society will pay the bill now. Last week government ended basic sholarship for poor university student because of a lack of money. Medical care is also deteriorating for many old folks under new “DIY” laws.
    Logically, because the security bills are rising sky high. For instance, one IS returnee uses an absurdistic amount of security people for 24/7 surveillance. IS murderers are labelled “confused young men” in Holland. One has to be carefull how to address these “freedom fighters”.

    Anyway, left wing parties with their left wing hobby’s will cause an enormous divide between poor and rich, ironically, and strangely seem the ones that support fascist mindless idiots.

    (Sorry for my bad english).

    • gungadin says

      Feb 8, 2015 at 6:27 am

      @ Fred
      Much of what you describe is going on here in America today and has been going on for quite a long while. Disagree with the POTUS and you are labeled a racist; ditto if you have a different opinion contrary to a black or an asian.

      A crucifix submerged in a jar of urine is considered “art” and freedom of expression. Be critical of the Koran and you are set upon by those who follow the madness in it.

      It’s pretty pitifull…I was raised at a time when you could poke fun at any manner of race, religion or ethnicity…….remember when “Blonde” jokes were popular? It was all in gun fun….. People laughed at those types of things and laughed at themselves. Now we have all become SUPER SENSITIVE…..

      We are becoming a world of WUSSIES…..

      Political Correctness in all its forms will be the death of many nations unless they stop the madness wise up and turn things around.

      • Bettina says

        Feb 8, 2015 at 4:12 pm

        You want to talk about madness, Gugadin? Try this one on for size.

        A CNN interviewer today hosted Zuhdi Jasser, a notable Muslim-American proponent of Islamic reform, a former Jordanian government official, and a so-called ambassador of some sort of good works, a black American woman.
        The Jordanian and the ‘ambassador’ pushed ‘plurality’ and ‘integration’ to explain and justify muslim bitterness and resentment in the West. They kept ramming that message at us, harking back to it endlessly. How utterly disgusting is that?

        Of course, CNN never pointed to the thousands of muslims who, though well integrated into their native countries, nonetheless blow one another up at will and random.

        Of course, CNN never mentioned that muslims themselves cause their separation by forming fifth columns in the West — complete with no-go zones, mega-mosques, hijabs, niqabs, and burqas in public, endless attacks on free speech, vitriolic sermons from their pulpits, and their perennial efforts to push every aspect of shariya law they can upon the democracies where they live as social but entitled parasites.
        That would all be too hard to imagine, wouldn’t it, CNN?
        Dr. Jasser tried but failed at instilling a sense of balance and truth to the interview, outnumbered as he was.

        And CNN? Well, it just provided one more international forum for muslim supremacists to keep blaming the West and white privilege for their jihadism.

        God I’m starting to HATE CNN!

        • M S case says

          Feb 8, 2015 at 6:01 pm

          @Bettina Starting to dislike CNN????? You should never watch CNN, ABC CBC NBC MSNBC or even your local stations FOX is the only news that is News and sometimes even they get it wrong

        • Bettina says

          Feb 8, 2015 at 7:10 pm

          Dear M S Case, comment below mine. Guess I must like ingesting mind poison, dear friend.
          I’ve been watching Fox News ever since I enrolled in the school that is JW, thanks to everyone here. This has been a fantastic education!

          Only FOX dares, again and again, to call out our Catatonic in Chief and his mouthpieces on his dutiful avoidance of the terms Jihadism, Islamic Terrorism, Islamic Extremism, and other such truthful labels.

          The only thing I can fault FOX with is their blindness to the political totality of the Koran, with its 162 or 164(?) imperatives to Jihad, and commands to the ummah to support jihad however they can.
          Also, FOX is blind to the irrevocability of a Koran rooted in antiquity, which it is forbidden to reform. The only religion on earth that will not evolve with civilization.

          So FOX concentrates challenging our government’s cowardliness in naming the beast, sort of — still, a world ahead of the leftist media I’ve finally grown to despise.
          (Sort of = Islamic extremism, but not the entirety of that filthy death and torture cult that it actually is.)

        • voegelinian says

          Feb 9, 2015 at 5:59 pm

          Ah yes, Zuhdi Jasser, the Better Cop who fools most inside the Counter-Jihad that Islamic reform is possible. He hasn’t fooled Andrew Bostom, at least.

    • pumbar says

      Feb 8, 2015 at 8:07 am

      Bad English? What you said there my friend would shame any monoglot English speaker. Good on you.

      • pumbar says

        Feb 8, 2015 at 12:03 pm

        That’s why I congratulated Fred on his post. You’re not getting into the whole paranoid conspiracy post thing are you?

      • Joseph says

        Feb 8, 2015 at 2:09 pm

        Martin, In one of your posts you said that you are having a hard time convincing others of the truth. You are not alone. Here in the U.S.A. I am also banging my head against a brick wall. I found that if you can talk to people one on one you will get a much better response. when you eliminate that group mentality you start to break down barriers and start to get results.

        I hope this helps. Sorry for the slang, when I was in Europe I got some puzzled looks when I used American slang. Made for interesting conversations though, and more friends. Yes over a couple pints of beer.

      • Joseph says

        Feb 8, 2015 at 3:03 pm

        Yes I did get those links and they are now bookmarked. I really appreciate them because I did look at them and they MOST CERTAINLY will help me personally and to help me help others to see what is really going on.

        I still get bewildered and confused as to why people can’t or don’t want to see what is going on; then I remember of the way I thought before I saw the truth. The indoctrination starts at childhood(pro-Muslim) and now I am teaching my kids to look for the truth(real) and decide for themselves. They also come to the same conclusion(WOW dad is right).

        We also must teach our children to dig for the truth and not what the news media or politicians tell them.

  4. ECAW says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 2:46 am

    I saw this in the papers a couple of days ago and assumed they were almost certainly Muslims and when I saw the headline here I thought “Good, they must have traced them”. But no, RS is just stating as fact what is only an assumption. Doesn’t really help the cause does it?

    • martinR says

      Feb 8, 2015 at 4:52 am

      You are right, definitely Catholics or maybe atheist as they are rampant beheaders and rapists of girls in the UK.

      I wonder why they don’t just go ask the Pope for their names, then the girls could go and apologize for inconveniencing these pious Christian ‘Brothers’ !

      • ECAW says

        Feb 8, 2015 at 5:08 am

        You misrepresent me, as I am sure you are aware. I am not saying these two are not Muslims or even that it’s not a reasonable assumption. But it’s not a fact – yet.

        JW doesn’t like it when attacks on mosques are assumed to be by non-Muslims, only for it later to be found out that it was by Muslims with some devious agenda.

        Apart from the question of sticking to the facts, which is something I admire JW for generally, they are going to look pretty silly if they turn out to be anti-Muslims (yes, some are brown) trying to stir it for Muslims or just idiots having what they think is a laugh.

        • Mirren10 says

          Feb 8, 2015 at 12:19 pm

          ECAW says:

          ”Apart from the question of sticking to the facts, which is something I admire JW for generally, they are going to look pretty silly if they turn out to be anti-Muslims (yes, some are brown) trying to stir it for Muslims or just idiots having what they think is a laugh.”

          I think your premise is *highly* unlikely.

        • voegelinian says

          Feb 9, 2015 at 6:01 pm

          Interesting that PJ never answered ECAW’s question — “Well, I think it unreasonable to assume that Islam can ever coexist with civilization, don’t you?”

        • Angemon says

          Feb 10, 2015 at 5:14 pm

          voegelinian posted:

          “Interesting that PJ never answered ECAW’s question”

          You’re one to talk…

      • voegelinian says

        Feb 11, 2015 at 3:44 pm

        Angemon’s question to me is the Tu Quoque fallacy. Also, I’m not talking about a question of mine, but a question from someone else (ECAW). Thirdly, Phillip Jihadski was evidently involved in a repeated exchange with ECAW (as evidenced above), and yet suddenly fell silent at that most crucial, apposite question.

        • Angemon says

          Feb 11, 2015 at 4:13 pm

          voegelinian posted:

          “Angemon’s question to me is the Tu Quoque fallacy.”

          That doesn’t answer any of the questions I asked you and to which you refused to answer. Besides, I’m not debating with you in any way – had PJ said so you might have had a point there.

          However, it proves that you’re a hypocrite – someone who says one thing and does the opposite. Remember when you said?

          http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/01/saudi-king-abdullah-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-1185295

          “voegelinian says

          January 23, 2015 at 6:35 pm

          I hope Angemon isn’t under the impression that I bother to read his posts anymore…”

          More from voeg:

          “Also, I’m not talking about a question of mine, but a question from someone else (ECAW).”

          At best, that’s irrelevant. At worse, it’s none of your beeswax – shouldn’t it be ECAW making that remark? And besides, you’ve ran away several times after I’ve asked you questions regarding things you said to other users – once again, you’re further cementing your reputation as a hypocrite.

          “Thirdly, Phillip Jihadski was evidently involved in a repeated exchange with ECAW (as evidenced above), and yet suddenly fell silent at that most crucial, apposite question.”

          Much like you did on several occasions. In any way, I haven’t seen PJ posting recently, so chances are that he didn’t reply to ECAW because he’s not around to see the post.

          So voeg, are you willing to answer my questions now or do you prefer to keep playing the “oh no, look at that, PJ is a terrible person because in this case he’s apparently doing exactly what I do all the time!” game?

  5. Ephesian says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 3:22 am

    Apparently this “incident happened two weeks ago….now it has only just been made public.Of course,we have yet to see our Dave speaking on tv” this has absolutely nothing to do with islam and we,the British people apologise unreservedly for any distress caused to the muslim community”…….

  6. VictorMc says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 4:08 am

    That is a Dutch number plate presumably stolen.

    • tilda says

      Feb 8, 2015 at 6:17 am

      The link provided by Fred (above) to access data for the vehicle in the automated Dutch system suggests that the vehicle is not stolen.

      Link as provided by Fred is https://ovi.rdw.nl/

  7. Lee says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 4:45 am

    “David Cameron will be ringing up these two gentlemen, apologizing for inconveniencing them, and presenting these two girls for beheading.” – well said. Anyone who doesn’t offer themselves for beheading is clearly intolerant, and dare we say it…racist. And phobic into the bargain. And any other ridiculous manipulation Islam’s collaborators can think of to cow the public.

    Tolerance only goes one way regarding Islam, the most *intolerant* death-cult in history. Muslims threaten to behead all non-Muslims for thinking Muhammad lied when claiming to speak for Allah, or for drawing cartoons, etc etc, and in return we must tolerate it. But anyone who genuinely cared about “tolerance” would ban Islam as quickly as they would make gay-bashing a crime. Tolerating INtolerance *necessarily* makes an intolerant society.

    But the politicians who have shoved this murderous filth down our throats won’t have the last laugh. They’ll be remembered by history as traitors, and as the worst scum of the earth.

    • FarmerMike says

      Feb 8, 2015 at 9:15 am

      Quite right, Lee: “… anyone who genuinely cared about ‘tolerance’ would ban Islam as quickly as they would make gay-bashing a crime.”
      That’s why I propose that some of file a class action, anti “Hate Speech” suit against the Koran, Mosques, Madrassas, & Imams from coast to coast. This strategy should lead to the ending of “The Silence of the Media Lambs” for one thing. And Maybe it will lead to a a banning of the Koran, etc., just as “Huckleberry Finn” was once banned from the New York Public Library for including “hate speech.”
      Note that this is basically a First Amendment strategy. If it fails, we always have the Second Amendment to fall back upon.
      But let’s make use of the First Amendment strategy first, okay?
      –FarmerMike

      • Bettina says

        Feb 9, 2015 at 11:58 pm

        Love your ban-the-Koran move in libraries! But, a team of very dedicated top lawyers would be needed to fight the 1st Amendment in that arena…

      • Lee says

        Feb 24, 2015 at 2:36 am

        @FarmerMike, apologies for the late reply. I think your ideas are great – the law should certainly be used against Islam, and we need to get active. Islamic teaching clearly contravenes matters like hate-speech and criminal incitement. Also for the future, Islamic countries are trying to have a law against “blasphemy” introduced by the UN, which Islam also manifestly contravenes.

        Being an Aussie I’m not sure about US law, and my focus here for the moment is on Treason Law, because I want to especially target our NON-Muslim politicians who facilitate Jihadis gaining access to our citizens. Under section 80.1 of our Criminal Code, a person commits treason if he or she (among other things):
        “intentionally assists, by any means whatsoever, an enemy, at war with the
        Commonwealth”

        Since Muslims who adhere to the notion of Jihad and Islamic dominance are by definition at war with us, and several of our politicians (and journalists) have intentionally assisted them in several ways, including in them gaining access to our country and people, I believe a case exists for prosecution.

        The word “intentionally” of course implies knowledge. And since 9/11 there have been many instances where a reasonable person in charge of immigration could be assumed to have knowledge of the ideology and practice of Islamic Jihad – including after Aussies were targeted for bombing in Bali in 2002. Bin Laden said at the time the bombings were in retaliation for support of the US war on terror and Australia’s role in the liberation of East Timor. His message to Australians continued:
        “You will be killed just as you kill, and will be bombed just as you bomb”, “Expect more that will further distress you.”

        Since then the stream of Jihadis imported into our country has continued unabated. Now if politicians deliberately let a bunch of Nazis into Australia during WW2, at some point they couldn’t legitimately claim they didn’t know what the Nazis stood for.

        I note US Treason Law states:
        “Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or *adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere*, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

        Maybe this could be an avenue worth pursuing in the US as well your other ideas? Sorry for the long post.

        • FarmerMike says

          Feb 25, 2015 at 7:19 pm

          To all JW Bloggers: Isn’t NOW, THIS WEEK, a particularly good time to send “Impeach Obama” emails to our Representatives & Senators? Citing his “Muslim Brotherhood” connections.

          Particularly because Netanyahu will be talking to a joint session of Congress. And he is a clear thinker & speaker. And he’ll be speaking from the front of the room.

          Meanwhile, If we JW Bloggers sound much the same note, via emails–from the “back of the room,” so to speak–we have more of a chance of breaking through to at least some of the more awake and courageous CongressCritters, dontcha think? We’ll be sending our Congress a “double-teamed” wake up call.

          I’ve sent in emails. I even snail-mailed in a 10 item packet of print-outs from Spencer’s & others’ writings.

          Anyone else interested?

        • Bettina says

          Feb 26, 2015 at 1:21 am

          To Farmer Mike, below:
          This is certainly a very good idea! You’re a great activist, Mike!

          I’ll jump on your bandwagon and address my congress people. I was thinking about a nuclear Iran, but impeaching the bozo sounds equally good, on the grounds of offering comfort and solace to that brotherhood and all jihadis in the world.
          I’ll be polite and articulate, of course.

    • Bettina says

      Feb 24, 2015 at 4:43 pm

      Lee, I loved your nugget, “Tolerating INtolerance *necessarily* makes an intolerant society.”
      Just like the submissive, cowering millions in Germany did vis-à-vis Nazism, isn’t it?
      Quite simply, tolerating the intolerable! Thereby acquiescing to the sub-human.
      I’ll read the rest of your ideas on this page in a moment. But had to send you my compliment.

      • Lee says

        Feb 25, 2015 at 6:16 am

        Thanks Bettina. You know I’d love to see a demonstration on TV of why tolerating intolerance creates intolerance. You could have a glass pitcher of a refreshing fruit drink, labelled ‘Tolerance’, and a glass pitcher of raw sewerage labelled ‘Intolerance’.

        The presenter could pour some of the ‘Intolerance’ sewerage into the ‘Tolerance’ fruit juice, while saying: “When we tolerate the adding of ‘Intolerance’ to ‘Tolerance’, we create just another jug of ‘Intolerance’ – turning our formerly attractive drink into poisonous sewerage”

        It just annoys me how the craziest ideas – like adding Islamofascism to civilized societies – take so long to die.

        On treason, here in Australia with the case I want to bring I intend to cite not only Islamist terror groups declaring war on us in 2002, but to also quote the Grand Mufti of Australia, who in 2004 praised the 9/11 mass-murder of 3,000 random, innocent people: “September 11 is God’s work against oppressors” (see http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/28/1077677014393.html ).

        My hope is that with the Grand Mufti publicly praising mass-murder of random people, we have solid evidence that the cult he represents is one at war with civilization – and so any follower of such a cult should have been prevented entering Australia at least from that point in time! (Yet our most recently arrested Muslim terrorists were formally allowed to enter Australia after 2009.)

        • Bettina says

          Feb 25, 2015 at 5:07 pm

          Your imagery is stinkingly rich there, Lee!
          Quite unfortunately, the pitcher of poisonous intolerance would no doubt provide fodder for those liberal fools in their march for the love of islam. And here again, we’re beaten before we start!

          To your point about treasonous invitations to muslims, our Obozo, our Traitor-in-Chief, has just begun the process of offering asylum to thousands of Syrians, right? Who in their right mind?!!!

          More to the point, we would need genius lawyers to ferret out irrefutable evidence of treason, a loophole being having no clear precedent addressing the fact of offering solace to agents of a mere ideology. Here, we’d need a battalion of brainiacs to file a class-action suit against our various depts. and politicians.
          Where, oh where can we get that help??

          I’m certain David Hershowitz, Robert, Pamela, Brigitte, et al have mulled this over for years and come up with nothing. Just saying…

      • Lee says

        Feb 25, 2015 at 7:00 am

        I meant to add that when the Grand Mufti of Australia praised 9/11, he also spoke of conquering the USA (our ally), and the requirement of Muslim war against *all* infidels – e.g. “Brothers of Islam, there is a war of infidels taking place that *requires real men and strong positions that prove our manhood towards God, his prophet and his religion.*”

        And later in the same speech “Sons of Islam, there is a war of infidels taking place EVERYWHERE” [my caps – “everywhere” includes Australia]

        The Grand Mufti of Australia’s full speech (quite long) is at http://www.abc.net.au/religion/stories/s1058934.htm – and after re-reading it, I’m pretty confident treason trials will be able to take place here.

        • Bettina says

          Feb 25, 2015 at 5:11 pm

          About that grand mufti psycho, Lee, I’m so sick at the thought of plowing thru his vicious rant that I don’t have the heart to go there.
          Maybe others here will have the stamina…

  8. Angemon says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 5:30 am

    The driver was described as black or Asian

    Must have been one of them chinese…

    sarc. off

    • Kenny says

      Feb 8, 2015 at 8:45 am

      No, they must be Jews. After all, it must be their fault, even if there were no Jews within 100 miles. Stands to reason, doesn’t it?

  9. Es says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 5:37 am

    I’ll bet my balls all soldiers in the UK are un-armed and they will respond to this by guarding bases with private security tools! Guys come on the west minster system is obsolete and too inefficient to deal with this threat. Strong leaders are needed who will take heavy handed draconian measures. The sooner, the better.

  10. Es says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 5:38 am

    Why not arm the reservists you neurotic bureaucrats! Marxist thieves! Are we that stupid? Watch demolition man with Stallone, thats the kind of society we have become.

  11. Andrew GB says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 6:20 am

    Dont you just love multiculturalism, if they are black and Asian then it would appear the Chinese or Koreans are getting in on the act too!

  12. Jaladhi says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 7:16 am

    Brits may call them Blacks or Asians but the fact is these are all Muslims, likely Pakistani Muslims. But the toothless British lion has no guts to tell the truth. It will lead to the demise of Britain. Invite the murderers to your home and this is what will happen to you!!

    • jayell says

      Feb 8, 2015 at 12:04 pm

      I think you’ll find that our marvellous Prince Charles has just told the truth in a well-publicised speech out in the middle east somewhere. Wonder how long it will last?

      • jayell says

        Feb 8, 2015 at 1:54 pm

        I can’t give you a link, but it’s either the UK Sunday Times, Sunday telegraph or Mail On Sunday. Try the ‘mail online’.

      • Bettina says

        Feb 8, 2015 at 5:08 pm

        Well at least the good prince didn’t blame white privilege and the lack of plurality, did he?
        I just read a little bit from Jayell’s reference above.

  13. thomas pellow says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 7:34 am

    “Police release CCTV images after army cadets were ‘threatened with beheading.'”

    http://www.itv.com/news/tyne-tees/update/2015-02-06/police-release-cctv-images-after-army-cadets-were-threatened-with-beheading/?

  14. Andy says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 10:26 am

    FYI, Army Cadets is the UK equivalent of JROTC. This would have been high school girls between the ages of 14 and 17 who do this as an after school club.

    The lack of action by the Police just confirms the UK is lost and may well be past the point of no return.

  15. David Schwep says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 10:53 am

    Once upon a time the British were renown for posting the heads of their enemies hung upon posts on her bridges — Now they are handing their own heads over to the enemy they have given haven to within her own borders.

  16. Kevin Walker says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 12:47 pm

    Britain has launched a special drive to recruit hordes of mohammedans in their Army.
    Police & other govt. departments are already infected with them now it’s British Army which will be contaminated, taking away any chance of native resistance.

    • jayell says

      Feb 8, 2015 at 1:51 pm

      The Rotherham debacle has shown up the effects of having muslims in the police. I believe that three ‘officers’ are under investigation, no doubt for complicity in the abuse of the girls, and a fourth, one PC Ali, was strangely recently killed in a car accident whilst under investigation and with huge question marks hanging over his reputation. Then there was the infamous Ali Desai who was clearly grossly over-promoted (deliberately?) in the Met, indulged himself in corruption and utterly thuggish near-criminal behaviour and brought the force into serious disrepute. And they’re the ones that I know about, without any inside knowledge. And don’t forget the stories of muslim personel in the American armed forces turning on their colleagues. They can’t be trusted. End of.

  17. Katnis says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 12:48 pm

    Black or Asian? Thats not how I would describe those muslims. Thanks for watering things down, media.

  18. L S Mphela says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 1:12 pm

    After being exposed to the fundamental teachings of Islam through the works of Robert Spencer, David Wood, Tom Holland and many more. As a South African, I find it strange that European countries and North America allow mosques to be built. Children growing up in Europe and North America should only know mosques through photos of mosques taken in Asia.

  19. FarmerMike says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 1:18 pm

    Hello? Is there anyone on this blog who can comment on this strategy?
    File a class action, anti-‘Hate Speech” suit, against all publishers of the Koran, Mosques, Imams & Madrassas. Maybe the courts will entertain the suit.
    Morre important, tho, the mass media might take notice, and begin to end the “Silence of the Media Lambs” re the menace of the Islamic “Stealth Jihad” currently strolling un-molested across America.
    This is basically a First Amendment strategy.
    If it doesn’t work, we can always fall back to the Second Amendment.
    But let’s arouse some sleeping potential allies first, okay?
    –FarmerMike

    • Bettina says

      Feb 8, 2015 at 6:26 pm

      Mike, no attorney firm will file a class action without first studying any and all precedents that might have overcome the monolith barrier of our first amendment — a blessing and a curse.
      Your fascination with hate speech echoes my own, believe me.
      It could be, however, that our contempt for hate speech is doomed to lock horns with our right to free speech for an eternity.

      And remember — those muzzie retards will inevitably file charges that saying the truth about islam = hating islam = hate speech. In effect, muzzling our freedom to tell the truth.

      • FarmerMike says

        Feb 8, 2015 at 6:43 pm

        Bettina, yes, I have regularly thought my comments were being blocked. But, they usually show up.
        I’ve never filed any kind of suit. Seems to me, tho, with so many people suing for relatively frivolous purposes, some rather intelligent lawyer wishing to protect this country, would be willing to take this case on. I realize all persons publicly connected to such a case could become jihad targets. But we are anyway. Right now, jihadists are strolling across America, herding us like sheep into or out of “sharia” zones. This is the “Stealth Jihad” way. Google on it.
        JihadWatch is doing most excellent work!! But Robert can’t do it alone.
        As I see it, we must exercise our First Amendment rights as loudly as we can. And I see this class action suit method as a pretty good megaphone way to do it.
        Otherwise, we are left with just the option of exercising our Second Amendment rights.
        What do you think?
        FarmerMike

        • Bettina says

          Feb 9, 2015 at 11:32 pm

          Hi Mike – I hope you return to this page to continue our thread.
          I’m sure you realize that our predicament in trying to balance everyone’s right to free speech — and attacking the free speech we find hateful — is a thorny and possibly lowing proposition.

          These duplicitous muslims would immediately turn our rights on their head, i.e:

          We sue them for hate speech.
          They counter-sue on the grounds of free speech: they’re allowed to say and write anything they want in OUR country. Neo-nazis enjoy that right, so what’s the problem?
          (I’ve seen the filth they write about Jews and Blacks myself here in Seattle.)

          In that moment, we’re locked into a constitutional battle, the muslims using OUR OWN RIGHT to say and publish our opinions by turning it on its head to protect their right to death-dealing propaganda.

          Then, the muzzie cockroaches will file suits against US for islamophobic speech, thus returning the favor of our own suit against their hate speech. See?

          To yours about the 2nd Amendment, I’ve been slowly revising my liberal views on gun control, because of the demonic parasites we are all harboring, and the real threat they pose to everyone in the West.

        • Bettina says

          Feb 9, 2015 at 11:50 pm

          Mike, using our 2nd Amendment right should be always done in self-defense, not in going and killing every Abdul, Aziz and Ahmed that crosses our path.

          The only way to effectively fight stealth jihad by creating strong initiatives or referendums. I think we need 200,000 signatures to begin grinding thru our state legislatures.

          I’m sure that Robert, Pamela, Brigitte and their allies are hard at work trying to find legal answers to Islamic hate speech and poisonous propaganda, and how to encourage our states to fight the idea of sharia tooth and nail by legal pre-emptive measures.

          Sound correct to you, Mike?

  20. Jae M says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 2:33 pm

    Oh come now, how hard can it be to track them down with a license clearly on the vehicle? What country doesn’t stand up for its own military? These two COWARDS again picking non-armed, teenage GIRLS to threaten…let’s see them do that to two armed men pointing weapons right back at them. They are weak and pathetic.

    • FarmerMike says

      Feb 10, 2015 at 12:24 am

      @Bettina: Some thoughts:
      1) On-line info on “hate speech” court cases –one of the first being a 1941 case involving a Jehovah’s Witness toungue-lashing of a police officer–indicate that a court case based on ‘threatening speech’ has a chance to be heard.
      2) Did you know that “Huckleberry Finn” was banned from the NYPublic Library back in the 1960s or thereabouts, because it included some racist terms?
      3) I’m pretty sure that speech that is directly threatening is disallowed. Examples are the 109 “open-ended” violence-commanding verses in the Koran.
      4) The courts are not the only route. Public speaking is another. We can use our First Amendment rights to directly send letters to mosques, newspapers, colleges, universities, churches–proposing a panel discussion of the 109 Koran verses.
      Surely this activity is bound to attract SOME attention. We are likely to get a nibble of response somewhere along the line. It’s like fishing: Put out enough lines, you’re bound to get a strike somewhere. I think it is wise to make sure that the media is alerted to what we are doing, to maximize publicity.
      Do we run the risk of being targeted by zealous jihadist Muslims? Absolutely! But as it stands now, we are already being targeted, or “herded,” by strolling shari’a jihadists, who bamboozle us into timidity by invoking polite multicultural values. We are being quietly “hung on our own petards!” Herded to the “shambles.”
      5) Yesterday on this blog, I commented on the petition that 100,000-plus UK Muslims signed and handed in at #10 Downing St., London. This petition demanded “civil discourse, debate, & dialogue…” Well, there you go! We’re being invited, at least in England, to confront them in dialog & discourse & debate! We have the list of 109 violent, “open-ended” verses from the Koran, thanks to Robert Spencer. So, what are we waiting for?
      6) I am already sending out letters to my Congress Critters, local FM radio, & newspapers. Am planning on adding mosques, colleges, universities, & churches.
      7) If we stand back in fear, we are simply joining the “Silence of the Media Lambs,” & quietly awaiting our own slaughter. So, to invoke the question of the ancient Hebrew prophet: if not us, who? If not now, when?
      –FarmerMike

      • FarmerMike says

        Feb 10, 2015 at 12:45 am

        @Bettina, in fact, the 109 open-ended violence verses against unbelievers, should be metaphorically “Nailed on the door of every mosque in America,” –Martin Luther-style. And duplicate copies of these “nailings” or “MAILINGS”, should be sent to ALL of the local press!! Nota bene!This should be a “public shaming” of the Koran.
        BTW, I came across an article online about how lots of Muslims–intellectuals aw well as regular folk–are LEAVING Islam, becoming apostates, once they discover a taste of Western freedom. I guess it’s an “Internet Effect.”
        –FarmerMike.

      • Bettina says

        Feb 10, 2015 at 12:39 pm

        Glad to see you Mike — please come back later as I must run to an appointment. We’ll resume our dialogue.

      • Bettina says

        Feb 11, 2015 at 12:54 pm

        Good to hear from you, Mike. To your points:

        1- On-line info on “hate speech” court cases – Do you have a link to post for us here? Even if we file suits left and right, being defeated by our 1st Amendment would hand sweet victory over to these animals. So, is the publicity worth the eventual risks?

        2- Libraries: a worthwhile outlet to research precedent book bans in some depth, state by state. Submitting results to Robert, David Horowitz and others, a possible strategy.

        3- These bloody koranic commands are matched by biblical imperatives to wipe out certain tribes to achieve divine predestination. Three winning arguments here: (a) civilization has abandoned this madness (except for perennial anti-Semitism); (b) those ancient tribes, not humanity at large, were designated for slaughter; and (c) the Koran is eternal, and the irrevocability of that filth promises eternal bloodshed.

        4, 5- Panel discussions to challenge those koranic verses sounds good, one which Robert et al are discussing in any media with every breath they take. What is your vision there? Who would be involved? How to be protected?

        6- Kudos to you for your dedication in sending all these letters!! I’d enjoy reading a short synopsis of a letter to Congress and one to a mosque.

        • FarmerMike says

          Feb 11, 2015 at 5:35 pm

          @Bettina, 1a, Well, I think we should research such cases. I don’t see how we can lose, because the threats are so many & so blatant. I’m surprised someone hasn’t sued them already. By doing nothing, we definitely lose. We have to take a stand. If not us, ho” If not now, when?

          2a. I will contact my local library probably tomorrow. Also, I have an app’t to see the Catholic priest tomorrow a.m. I’m not Cathholic, but he is, and he should be taking the measure of this threat probably even more than myself. I’ve knocked on the doors of 3 other, Protestant, churches, & nobody home. I think we all need to read Robert’s excellent books, esp. his “Stealth Sharia” book. Strategies are bound to emerge. We need to get beyond this “locker-room” or “football huddle” talk many of us have been engaging in on this blog, bragging about what we will do, and be up and doing. I don’t mean gun-play. I mean awakening folks with words, information, examples, such as we see w/ Pamela in Texas, and Weston in UK. Time’s a-wasting. Got to be up & about.

          3a. Not quite. It may be true we are living out some karma due to those early wipe-outs. But, most of the verses we find in the Bible are talking about history. They are “descriptions,” not “open-ended directives.” The Old Testament writes history. The Koran gives orders. Nevertheless, re-visiting Old Testament verses is relevant, because: A) Mostly, they pointedly illustrate what civilized people have OUTGROWN! & B) Furthermore, these verses can help us to raise philosophical questions about what further evolution we wish to make in our civil conduct.

          4a & 5a. I think if we copy out some of the material already available online, & read Robert’s book on “Stealth Sharia,” and do some practicing, we can walk into a college or a university and offer to debate the local Muslims. The worst that can happen is that some Muslim takes offense & kills us. Which they are intending to do, anyway. Better to go down swinging. And notify the media & the police ahead of time, of what we are intending to do. We want witnesses. I don’t think we should PICK a fight, but we should not be surprised if there is violence from them. You see how they can’t take a joke or any criticism. They are babies & bullies.
          –FarmerMike

  21. Jae M says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 3:07 pm

    My first comment disappeared, so I will try again. First off, how hard can it be for police to track down a vehicle with the licence number right on it? Second, what Country does not defend its own military and cadets? Cadets should feel secure there.
    Again, we see these COWARDS threatening unarmed GIRLS that have no weapons to defend themselves. Notice they pick the easiest targets. What would they do if they had two grown men soldiers with guns pointed at them in defense? I doubt they would threaten them. They pick defenseless citizens . They are weak and it shows by who they target to threaten death with. .

    • Jae M says

      Feb 8, 2015 at 3:57 pm

      Whoops…I guess my first comment is there now.

  22. FABRIZIO says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 3:40 pm

    Indeed a dutch car, like already pointed out!!!!

  23. Bettina says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 6:30 pm

    I’m having trouble finding my comments once I’ve submitted. I can eventually see it, when I return to the page to find out. This is new, and disconcerting.
    Does this happen with you too?

  24. Bettina says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 6:32 pm

    Now below Leave A Reply, I see that I’m logged in as M S case? My handle is Bettina!

    • pumbar says

      Feb 8, 2015 at 11:55 pm

      That’s probably your WordPress login name.

  25. MKG says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 7:50 pm

    This whole thing is disgusting on many levels. The politically correct horse has been beated but refuses to die. What gets me is how some one can refer themselves as a soldier, cadet or not, who is responsible for the defense of a country and it’s people, and be a victim to this kind of crap. It may come as a surprise to some of you that many of our soldiers are resistant to learning even fundamental hand to hand combat training. Even when that is all you have at your disposal when you take your leave of the base, and those who take their oath seriously consider themselves on duty 24/7. How can one expect to protect their nation when they can not even protect themselves?

    Politicians are definitely responsible for the wussification of their armed forces. I say less sexual harassment training and more combat training. Enable and empower those in uniform so the next time this happens, instead of whining about it they can say, “pull your blade and go to work shit-head. I’m curious as to how far you will get.” But that is not likely to happen. The armed services have become a work program where metro-sexuals and libtards have an equal opportunity to earn a government paycheck. So they are just as responsible.

    “You don’t win wars by dying for your country. You win by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his.”
    Gen. Patton
    (From the movie anyways)

  26. Jim Moriarty says

    Feb 8, 2015 at 10:00 pm

    The U.K has a problem Gun Control !!! If they had a 2nd Amendment like the USA the people could protect themselves. Until them they are just easy pickings for the Islamists. Nuf’ said.

  27. FarmerMike says

    Feb 9, 2015 at 8:31 am

    JW Friends, I see that a petition has been delivered to #10 Downing St. in London, signed by over 100,000 British Muslims, calling for “civility in any form of expression, dialogue, discourse & debate.” [I could not navigate the comment section on that site, so I post here.] The petition further claims the Charlie Hebdo massacre was a “violation of Islamic law.”
    Oh, really? Then how do you over 100,000 British Muslims & your Imam handlers explain the more than 109 verses in the Koran that call Muslims to war with us nonbelievers, so that Muslims can impose Islamic rule? There is nothing civil about such discourse. What do you say, you 100,000-odd Muslims & Imam handlers? C’mon. Let’s get it on! Let’s have that “civil discourse, dialogue & debate.” Are you ready? Can you “man up” to it?
    JW Friends, should we not write and send letters, couched in such terms as the above, to all the mosques & media outlets & churches, & colleges & universities, in our part of the world, challenging Muslims to step forward in the clear light of day and engage is a some “civil discourse” on the meaning of these multiple threats to our peaceful way of life? Should a civilized society allow such writings or such speech?
    True, we run the risk of murder by jihad.
    But that is a risk we are already taking, presently by stealth jihad, later by violent jihad. We gardeners & farmers learned as children that it is better to pull up weeds when they are small, rather than to let them grow into a 6-foot weeds or trees.
    I invite others to improve upon what I have written above.
    And to improve upon the strategy I have outlined.
    I prefer this First Amendment approach, first.
    FarmerMike

    .

  28. voegelinian says

    Feb 9, 2015 at 6:04 pm

    Interesting that Phillip Jihadski didn’t answer ECAW’s question: “Well, I think it unreasonable to assume that Islam can ever coexist with civilization, don’t you?”

    • Angemon says

      Feb 10, 2015 at 5:16 pm

      voegelinian posted:

      “Interesting that PJ never answered ECAW’s question”

      You’re one to talk…

      Do you want me to list ALL the questions I asked you and you never answered?

      • voegelinian says

        Feb 11, 2015 at 3:42 pm

        Tu quoque fallacy.

        • Angemon says

          Feb 11, 2015 at 4:11 pm

          voegelinian posted:

          “Tu quoque fallacy.”

          That doesn’t answer any of the questions I asked you and to which you refused to answer. Besides, I’m not debating with you in any way – had PJ said so you might have had a point there.

          However, it proves that you’re a hypocrite – someone who says one thing and does the opposite. Remember when you said?

          http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/01/saudi-king-abdullah-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-1185295

          “voegelinian says

          January 23, 2015 at 6:35 pm

          I hope Angemon isn’t under the impression that I bother to read his posts anymore…”

          So voeg, are you willing to answer my questions now or do you prefer to keep playing the “oh no, look at that, PJ is a terrible person because in this case he’s apparently doing exactly what I do all the time!” game?

          (BTW voeg, I haven’t seen PJ in JW recently, so chances are that he didn’t reply to ECAW because he’s not around to see the post).

    • jayell says

      Feb 12, 2015 at 5:34 am

      “The only way islam can coexist with the rest of humanity….. is to put it in a CAGE !!!” Sounds like you’re talking about some kind of apartheid here (yes, the dreaded ‘A’ word!). The answer is that you only need to read the newspapers to see that Islam has PROVED worldwide that it can’t coexist with the rest of humanity because of its bigoted supremacism, total lack of respect for those who don’t belong to it or don’t agree with, and the strong streak of amoral criminality and savagery that runs through it (just look at the catalogue of outrages that they’ve committed in the UK alone since they started arriving!). So perhaps, in the interests of everyone’s safety and well-being they should be separated out and not allowed to mix with the rest of society, rather like they’re now having to segregate cemeteries because muslims apparently can’t bear to be buried next to dirty infidels. And this is exactly what they themselves seem to want with their insolent and quite illegal claiming of ‘sharia’ no-go areas of our cities – their own territories. The only difference with official separation would be that the rest of the ‘non-sharia’ country would be no-go to THEM, and we’d all return to the safe and civilised existence that we hade before. Hardly very PC, but you must admit it’s logical.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Michael Copeland on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • Dude on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.