• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Boston Marathon jihad murderer jury questionnaire: “Do you believe the ‘war on terror’ unfairly targets Muslims?”

Mar 21, 2015 1:14 pm By Robert Spencer

TsarnaevDzhokharA“’Do you believe the United States government acts unfairly towards Muslims in this country or in other parts of the world?’ asks No. 60. ‘Do you believe the ‘war on terror’ unfairly targets Muslims?’ reads No. 61. ‘Do you believe the ‘war on terror’ is overblown or exaggerated?’ asks No. 62.” Apparently if you answer “Yes” to all three of these questions, the defense wants you on the Tsarnaev jury.

“Tsarnaev Jury Questionnaire Dug Into Siblings, Islamophobia,” by Eric Levenson, Boston Globe, March 18, 2015:

Among the 101 questions that potential jurors in the Boston Marathon bombing trial were asked are queries on sibling relationships, feelings toward Islam, and social media proficiency.

Those 101 questions, released to the public on Wednesday, are decided upon ahead of time by both the defense and prosecutors. As such, they provide hints as to the main thrusts of the arguments made by both sides.

About 1,350 prospective jurors filled out the 28-page questionnaire. The judge, prosecution, and defense teams then used those answers to eliminate most jurors from the pool. Of those that passed that first round, dozens were called back in for further questioning in person. The final pool of 18 jurors was chosen after another round of eliminations.

Let’s run down each of those categories within the jury questionnaire and compare it to the line of arguments in the trial so far.

Sibling relationships:

“Have any of your siblings tried to influence your direction in life or your major life decisions?” asks jury question No. 17. “Do you feel that any of your siblings has had a major positive or negative influence on you?” reads No. 19. “Do you believe most teenagers are easily influenced by older siblings?” asks No. 20.

Tsarnaev’s defense team has argued that Dzhokhar was under the thumb of his older brother Tamerlan, who they say was the mastermind of the bombings.

‘‘The evidence will not establish and we will not argue that Tamerlan put a gun to Dzhokhar’s head or that he forced him to join in the plan,’’ defense attorney Judith Clarke said in opening statements, ‘‘but you will hear evidence about the kind of influence that this older brother had.’’

Feelings toward Islam:

“Do you believe the United States government acts unfairly towards Muslims in this country or in other parts of the world?” asks No. 60. “Do you believe the ‘war on terror’ unfairly targets Muslims?” reads No. 61. “Do you believe the ‘war on terror’ is overblown or exaggerated?” asks No. 62.

That focus on Islam has come up repeatedly so far in the trial. Prosecutor William Weinreb argued that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev acted out of a belief that “he was a soldier in a holy war against Americans.” There was also the message Tsarnaev wrote while inside the boat where he was ultimately captured.

“We Muslims are one body, you hurt one you hurt us all,” the message reads.

In addition, FBI agent Steve Kimball testified that Tsarnaev ran a Twitter account @Al_firdausiA, which tweeted Islamic-focused messages. Finally, jurors were shown a photo of Tsarnaev in front of a Black Standard flag, a symbol of Islam that has in recent years been associated with jihadis….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: claiming victim status, courtroom jihad, Featured, United States Tagged With: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. gravenimage says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 1:39 pm

    Boston Marathon jihad murderer jury questionnaire: “Do you believe the ‘war on terror’ unfairly targets Muslims?”
    …………………………….

    So if you answer questions 60 – 62 in the negative, you are deemed “an Islamophobe”?

    It looks as though the defense wants a jury of dhimmis not only in deep denial, but also ones who have so little spine that they have let themselves be manipulated by their siblings all their lives. Scary.

    This is what our justice system has come to…

    • RonaldB says

      Mar 21, 2015 at 3:11 pm

      Hi Gravenimages,

      You actually shouldn’t judge the system by the partisan attorneys. Of course, the attorneys want to win and will go to all legal lengths for their clients. That’s their job.

      There are two ways to eliminate a juror. for cause, and a peremptory challenge. A “for cause” reason would be “I already read the newspaper accounts, and I’ve already decided on the guilt of the defendant.” This person is unable to evaluate the evidence presented in the trial. If a person says “I’ve read about the case, but I intend to keep an open mind, and decide based only on the evidence presented in the trial.” … it’s about the best you can do in a widely-publicized case, and should not be a cause for arbitrary dismissal.

      A peremptory challenge is at the discretion of the attorneys involved, but the attorneys have a limited number of such challenges. So, an attorney can eliminate a potential juror if the juror doesn’t feel that the influence of a big brother should excuse murder, but after the number of peremptory challenges runs out, you can still have people on the jury who feel that an individual is responsible for his own actions.

      So, the defense questions can be outrageous, but it doesn’t mean the system is broken, as long as the checks and balances are observed properly.

      What we want is to go by the old adage: “We’ll give him a fair trial, and then we’ll hang him.” We want both parts of those to be true.

    • Fr. Basil` says

      Mar 21, 2015 at 4:50 pm

      As everyone knows, what passes for mahometan terror is actually committed by a coalition of Buddhists and Two-Seed in the Spirit Double Predestination Seventh-Day Baptists.

      • Joseph says

        Mar 21, 2015 at 6:01 pm

        You forgot about the Alaskan Inuit.
        I heard that they are MAJOR players in this game too.

        I am kidding of course, I find that the Eskimos are a very interesting culture

    • Shane says

      Mar 22, 2015 at 9:51 am

      There should be many dhimmis in liberal Boston. How about closing that mosque that encouraged the Tsarnaev brothers to wage jihad against America?

  2. Dan says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 2:13 pm

    So did the prosecution get to pad their own question list?

    Have you had a military relative killed or injured by a Muslim?

    Do you think Islam is a legitimate religion?

    Should anybody involved in a terrorist act that results in death, automatically get the death penalty if found guilty?

    Are you Jewish and has a Muslim ever insulted you?

    Do you have family in Israel?

    Has a Muslim ever said anything that’s scared you, or made you wonder if you should call the police?

    Should anybody be harmed or killed because they drew a picture of Mohammad?

    Are you now, or have you ever been, a Muslim?

    The list is endless.

  3. Alarmed Pig Farmer says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 2:33 pm

    Do you believe the ‘war on terror’ is overblown or exaggerated?

    Hmm, this is a tough question, maybe even a trick question. Not to be Bill Clintonesque, we need to define “war” here. The word invokes visions of WWII, with guys in uniforms carrying guns and fighting over land territory. Jihad differs from war in that it frequently is not about land, at least not until the end. And there are no uniforms, except for being hairy and wearing funny hats and robes. Did the good guys in WWII important tens of millions of the enemy and put them on welfare to curry their votes?

    No, this is a trick question. “Jihad” should be substituted for “war” in all 101 questions.

    In reality, Moslems present the face of Janus, not to guard but to inflict. But in the media, Moslems present the single face of a Unicorn, a good hearted, colorful but misunderstood beast that can stampede if pissed off.

    • voegelinian says

      Mar 22, 2015 at 2:29 pm

      “And there are no uniforms, except for being hairy and wearing funny hats and robes.”

      You forgot about the Stealth Jihad, whose soldiers wear no uniforms, but try to blend in completely.

  4. Jay Boo says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 2:43 pm

    Why did they include any questions about Islam?
    Have his defense lawyers no shame?

    After all supposedly, Dzhokhar was zombified into total submission while under the controlling influence of his brother’s invisible nothing to do with Islam mind control ray. His brother in turn had become SELF-radicalized and fallen under the spell of a mysterious quasi-religious cult known by the generic name of radicalization
    Luckily, for Dzhokhar’s his brother’s dead body will serve as a surrogate in his place of himself and Islam while the defense pushes the ultimate root cause blame onto unknowable mysterious forces.

    • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

      Mar 21, 2015 at 7:43 pm

      Jay: it’s not a question of Joker’s lawyers ‘having no shame’. They are to be zealous. And in a trial like this, with a dead-to-rights guilty slimeball defendant like this? Trust me: This is the only way they can go.

      If you’re going to represent a client you have to be zealous. Now I-and attorneys who feel as I do (New Yorkers, members of SIOA, etc.) would not represent such a client. We can’t be zealous. But someone has to, because if not, the State gets to roll over everyone with their superior $, time and resources, OK?

      And as I already wrote, this is the best system in the world. With all its flaws!

      We will only find perfect justice in Heaven. In the meantime-if you’re going to stand trial, better be here.

      • Jay Boo says

        Mar 21, 2015 at 9:16 pm

        Kathy
        Yes you make good points about the lawyers being zealous but in a fully sane society their PC nothing to do with Islam defense would be laughed out of the courtroom and smacked down by the media.
        Sadly, The lawyers are able to ask questions about Islam while simultaneously claiming the old nothing to do with Islam defense.

        • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

          Mar 21, 2015 at 11:29 pm

          No Jay: You mean ‘in a perfect society’, which IS ‘a fully sane society’.

          We’re not going to have ‘fully sane’ in this world my friend-how can we? We are all fallen; there is original sin, and our natures are subject to vice.

          But I will say: If I HAD to defend this criminal I’d stick to the his-brother-made-him-do-it thing. But I don’t expect any defense to be effective; he’s too guilty. Meaning there’s too much evidence-all of which got in-which shows his overwhelming guilt, which the jury will know when deliberating.

      • voegelinian says

        Mar 22, 2015 at 2:40 pm

        Yes Kathy is correct about the law in the West (American law different in form but not in spirit from other Western countries). However, what’s wrong about any trial of a Muslim terrorist is the presumption that they are not enemy combatants in a war caught on the battlefield killing us. Imagine if in 1944 two German Nazi soldiers had somehow landed in New York harbor and proceeded to mass murder Americans. Would we try to arrest them in order to give them a fair trial? Not only is the situation we face today with Muslim terrorists equivalent, it is positively more deleterious and disastrous for our society.

        • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

          Mar 22, 2015 at 3:26 pm

          You are quite right Voeg. And this is a .point which should not be forgotten.

          The pertinent fact is, we are at war. Were we not-and was Joker not a member of the enemy force-this would be a case for Federal Court.

          But as all here know Zero the Pretender prefers his inner fantasy world to the ugly world of reality. Ditto his demented henchman Holder. So here we are: In Federal Court.

          And feature this: The Obama [‘it’s-got-nothing-to-do-with-islam-and-we’re-not-at-war-with-islam’] carried to its logical end would have only an ‘army’ of FBI agents swarming around the Middle East, arresting-not killling-the muslime menace.

        • voegelinian says

          Mar 23, 2015 at 5:59 pm

          And as Diana West has reminded us many times:

          “…the Leavenworth 10 sit in prison: Michael Behenna, Corey Clagett, John Hatley, William Hunsaker, Larry Hutchins, Michael Leahy, Joseph Mayo, Michael Williams, Evan Vela. Newcomer Derrick Miller has joined them. Miller last year drew a life sentence after unsuccessfully claiming self-defense in the killing of a suspected Afghan insurgent who had penetrated his defensive perimeter.”

          West amplified further, in the case of Evan (the one charged by his own country, America, with murder):

          In Evan’s case, the leader of his elite sniper squad chose the other path. It was May 2007, in insurgent-controlled Iskandariyah, Iraq. When an unarmed Iraqi man compromised the team’s “hide” and refused to cooperate quietly, the team leader chose not to risk drawing local insurgents to their position, but instead ordered Evan to kill the man. As a result of this decision, all of our soldiers came home that day.

          Meanwhile, as West adds:

          Meanwhile, literally thousands of incarcerated terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan have been granted clemency or otherwise found their freedom. Recently, Ali Musa Daqduq, a Hezbollah mastermind who confessed to kidnapping, torturing and killing five American soldiers in 2007, walked free in Iraq. In December 2011, President Obama turned over Daqduq to an Iraqi court, which released him this month. According to the most basic moral calculus, this is neither fair nor right. As Republican Rep. Allen West of Florida recently wrote to President Obama, it’s an “utter betrayal.”

          Full article:

          http://dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/2127/Leavenworth-Ten-Are-These-Soldiers-Really-Murderers.aspx

          And more were that came from:

          http://dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/2127/Leavenworth-Ten-Are-These-Soldiers-Really-Murderers.aspx

  5. Don McKellar says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 3:15 pm

    IT SOUNDS TO ME LIKE THE “DEFENCE” IS MAKING THIS TRIAL ALL ABOUT ISLAM AND NOT ABOUT THE CRIME. This is backfiring big time for the leftists and their Islamic supremacist masters. By making Islam the focus before the trial even begins, they have now put Islam on trial. THANK YOU.

    • Joe Shmo says

      Mar 21, 2015 at 7:36 pm

      That’s a great point. The fact that a Jihadist is on trial will mean that all the Islamic motivations will come out when he’s put on the stand. He’ll probably try to hide them (or be instructed too) but in the end he’ll speak of it.

      • voegelinian says

        Mar 22, 2015 at 2:42 pm

        No, it’s not a “great point”. It misses the point of PC MC. These jury questions are trying to weed out people who think terrorism is related to Islam, a connection which the Higher Court of PC MC (with more psycho-cultural power than the Supreme Court) has ruled impermissible. These questions are obviously assuming that enough people from the jury pool exist who make such a connection, and it’s apparently just making sure to winnow them out.

  6. duh_swami says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 3:32 pm

    I really miss Judge Roy Bean…

    • Joseph says

      Mar 21, 2015 at 8:24 pm

      Do you miss him or his unabashed use of the rope?
      I miss both.

  7. jewdog says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 4:09 pm

    I hope he gets off, or gets a very light sentence. Maybe then, people will become sufficiently outraged to start questioning the wisdom of using civilian courts against foreign enemy combatants.

    • Bezelel says

      Mar 21, 2015 at 4:35 pm

      jewdog, That would be the proper venue. I saw a cartoon years ago of a cowboy sheriff with a hanging rope in his hand talking to his condemned prisoner and he said ” I realize that society is to blame but I’ve only got one rope”

    • Brian Hoff says

      Mar 21, 2015 at 6:06 pm

      They are in the correct court of law. The crime happen in america so our civilian courts can handle it. The military trimute Bush and Cheny set up is illegal court.

      • gravenimage says

        Mar 22, 2015 at 1:11 am

        More words of wisdom from old “defenderofIslam”…sarc/off

      • Ernie says

        Mar 22, 2015 at 7:48 am

        OUR civilian courts ‘Brian’ ????? Since when are you an American citizen ?

        • gravenimage says

          Mar 22, 2015 at 1:20 pm

          Ernie, Brian Hoff claims to be a “revert” to Islam, and a native-born American from Texas. Whether this is actually the case is anyone’s guess.

    • Don McKellar says

      Mar 21, 2015 at 7:29 pm

      He is a US citizen who murdered a bunch of innocents based on the teachings of the dangerous religious cult he belongs to. This is the correct court for this trial. NOBODY — NO — BO –DY would question that fact if he were to get off lightly. They would question — AND RIGHTFULLY SO — the garbage system which the US legal system has degenerated to, starting with the first O.J. Simpson trial.

    • voegelinian says

      Mar 22, 2015 at 2:43 pm

      Indeed.

  8. Sam says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 4:12 pm

    What a f**** joke this trial is. We can not win against Islam when the courts, congress, military, police, whitehouse and all the public services are run by liberal idiots. We are doomed.

  9. jay says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 4:24 pm

    Hopefully some smart people answered what they wanted to hear and they didn’t actually get an entire pool of libtards. Please God. I hope the prosecutor is good.

  10. Mirren10 says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 5:11 pm

    ”About 1,350 prospective jurors filled out the 28-page questionnaire. The judge, prosecution, and defense teams then used those answers to eliminate most jurors from the pool. Of those that passed that first round, dozens were called back in for further questioning in person. The final pool of 18 jurors was chosen after another round of eliminations”

    What clearer indication can there be, that the ‘judicial’ process has absolutely nothing to do with justice ?

    This is not justice. Justice is, that the perpretator is judged according to the **evidence**.

    In fact, in civilised countries, **now**, there is no justice.. It comes down to whatever venal, morally compromised solicitor/barrister one can afford. Filth, all.

    • mortimer says

      Mar 21, 2015 at 5:37 pm

      Samuel Langhorne Clemens (aka ‘Mark Twain’) was the son of a judge. His father had no use for the jury system even back in the 1850s! He saw juries even then that sympathized with heartless killers and horrid thieves and refused to punish them ‘according to the evidence’ and ‘according to the law’.

      The present jury selection ‘science’ zeroes in on people who have a predisposition to sympathize with the accused and even turn a blind eye to evidence.

  11. Champ says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 5:33 pm

    Man! how do defense attorney’s sleep at night! …especially those defending the vilest of criminals like this perp. Really! How does one defend the undefensible? ..I just COULDN’T do it. You couldn’t pay me enough to defend this evil creep, no way. I value a good night’s sleep and a clean conscience way more than $$.

    And speaking of defending vile criminals …how do mohammedans sleep at night, as well? They defend and follow probably the most evil criminal that ever lived: muhammad (perdition be upon him), so here we have another head-scrather that I will *never, ever* understand.

    • Champ says

      Mar 21, 2015 at 5:36 pm

      😀 “head-scratcher”

    • mortimer says

      Mar 21, 2015 at 5:44 pm

      Muslims love Mohammed if they a) know almost nothing about Mohammed b) have read a fanciful, airbrushed biography of Mohammed or c) if they are psychopathic and read the Sira and approved of it.

      It can be seen then, that Muslims who fall into the above categories are a) lazy b) lacking independent curiosity or c) mentally ill.

      Jihadism is a kind of mental illness similar to the Stockholm syndrome. Most Muslims have to be seen as ‘patients’ suffering under a strong, sadistic, sociopathic and narcissistic delusion.

      Muslims need to be deprogrammed.

      • Champ says

        Mar 21, 2015 at 5:49 pm

        Muslims need to be deprogrammed.

        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

        Methinks many need an exorcism …

    • Wellington says

      Mar 21, 2015 at 7:11 pm

      To address your understandable query, Champ, about how defense attorneys can sleep at night, I will here provide a very personal example in this regard. My sister, who is also an attorney (a damn good one and definitely better than me) and who has her own law firm, was, before she became independently established, a Public Defender (PD). She had to defend some of the vilest creatures who pass as human beings and who have ever walked the earth. It was her job and she had to provide, per the law, the best defense possible.

      Anyway, she got a case about thirty years ago in which a stepfather was charged with raping his four-year old step-daughter. Yes, FOUR YEARS OLD (even beats Mohammed here, no?). The child had her vagina so ripped apart that it probably destroyed her capacity for normal sex for the rest of her life. Still, this monster asserted to my sister, who was obligated under the law to defend him, that he had not done the wicked deed he was charged with. My sister, being the eminently correct attorney that she is, advised her wretched client that if he pleaded guility he would get some 15-20 years in jail. However, if he did not take her advice and insisted on his innocence and was found guilty at trial, he would be given a life sentence. The man continued to insist on his innocence against all evidence and he was thereafter found guilty and given a life sentence. My sister afterwards told me she was never so happy to lose a case. I think many PDs function in this mode though high-priced private criminal defense attorneys more often than not do not.

      So, just thought I would convey this to you. Hope you and yours are well, Champ. Take good care, my friend.

      • Champ says

        Mar 21, 2015 at 10:35 pm

        Hi, Wellington! ..thank you for sharing your sister’s story, my friend.

      • gravenimage says

        Mar 22, 2015 at 1:22 am

        Thanks for sharing that story, Wellington—your sister sounds like a very decent person. And as in the case you cite, I actually think the jury system works very well most of the time.

  12. Vijay says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 5:40 pm

    Why is this guy still alive today? I am not particularly a fan of the death sentence but in extreme cases like him, killing innocent civilians in the name of a cult do not deserve to be kept alive. He is a waste of sperm and the poor civilians would have been alive today if that sperm had been flushed out.

    • jewdog says

      Mar 21, 2015 at 6:33 pm

      He should have his citizenship revoked and be executed by a military firing squad.

      • voegelinian says

        Mar 22, 2015 at 2:50 pm

        Indeed. Only I would add that we (not only America, but the entire West), needs to become aware — socially, psychologically, culturally, philosophically, and legally aware — that Muslims qua Muslims are inherently by definition incapable of acquiring citizenship of any polity that is not Islamic — though of course they are capable of the pretense of acquiring such citizenship, in order by stealth to further their violent jihad against us.

        I.e., the West needs to become aware (per the above) that Muslims are not citizens because they cannot be; and that therefore, there is nothing to revoke. I.e., the process that needs to happen is not the extra-ordinary legal process of a stripping of citizenship; but the even more extraordinary process of the deconstruction of our own PC MC paradigm by which we as a society persist in refusing to comprehend the full nature, and the full horror, of the unique case of Islam.

    • Paul says

      Mar 21, 2015 at 10:00 pm

      The prick gets to die a ‘martyr’s’ death, the Bostonians get to see
      justice done, and others are happy in the knowledge that he’ll be
      with ‘Allah’ (the Biblical Baal). Also, Muhammadans across the world
      can take a break from beating up their wives to indulge in fake
      righteous indignation by rioting at the ‘injustice’ of this subhuman’s
      execution. I don’t see what the problem is, everybody gets what they
      want.

  13. pdxnag says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 5:53 pm

    Did you know that Koran 47: 4 reads as follows: []

  14. Bezelel says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 8:39 pm

    I’m hoping he’s the first death row inmate to have his picture on the cover of Rolling Stone mag.

  15. Jay Boo says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 9:20 pm

    Muslims will probably stir up a few more Ferguson’s in order to distract attention.

  16. Linde Barrera says

    Mar 21, 2015 at 11:59 pm

    This question is for all the attorneys. Why cannot a convicted murder be sentenced to death by a 4 person firing squad in the US? In my humble opinion, this is the fastest way for the convict to die and keeps the punishment as humane as possible. Getting several bullets to the heart or brain causes death within 60 seconds. Lethal injection can take 40 minutes. The Boston Marathon bombings hit home for me in this way: My childhood friend was celebrating her 62 birthday during the beginning of May, 2013. I called to give my best wishes. She told me that her community was very sad because one of her neighbors came home minus a leg that had been blown off because of being near the finish line at the Boston Marathon.

  17. Linde Barrera says

    Mar 22, 2015 at 12:00 am

    Correction: convicted murderer

  18. Kathy Brown, Esq. says

    Mar 22, 2015 at 1:29 am

    Actually Linda your question is prescient. As we speak Utah is considering using firing squads for their executions in the near future.

    That’s because they can’t get the drugs for the lethal injections. So they’ve had to come up with an alternative. As you know, they used to use firing squads there.

    • Bezelel says

      Mar 22, 2015 at 12:16 pm

      Kathy, To be efficient and humane it doesn’t require an entire ceremonial firing squad. The slaughter houses for livestock (not the halal type) have a tried and true system. Of course halal execution would be poetic justice, I doubt he will be put in a cage and burned alive.

      • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

        Mar 22, 2015 at 9:08 pm

        That’s true Bez: Actually a simple rope and a gallows would suffice.

  19. shabeer_hassan says

    Mar 22, 2015 at 2:34 am

    It seems that the Israeli Mossad terrorists of the Boston Bombings are now almost clearly identified by the face and person. 3 female Israeli agents included.

    strong evidences for the Boston LIE:

    1- The Israeli FBI took a college professor’s mobile phone, and deleted all of the pictures he took. You’ll see the professor describing what the images were in the video.

    2- Clear PICTURES (plural) of three Israeli female agents placed one trash bag and two personal bags that latter exploded!

    3- The Boston police removed the tree where the blast happened. The tree would’ve shown which DIRECTION THE EXPLOSION CAME FROM!
    answering-christianity.com/boston_lies_fbi_videos_trash_bags_tree
    The Boston Bombings were another 9/11! They were an inside government job! See proofs of the older brother getting captured ALIVE and taken away. He wasn’t killed and found dead as they claimed. The two brothers were framed. They used to work for the FBI, and they got framed:

    The Tsarnaev brothers, Tamerlan (older) and Dzhokhar (younger) Tsarnaev used to work for the FBI, and they were framed.
    Boston Unanswered Questions:

    The following are yet-to-be-answered questions by the FBI and the zionist US government – the real enemy of the USA:

    1- Where are the guns the Tsarnaev brothers used in the shootouts?

    2- Where are the bombs the Tsarnaev brothers threw at police during the chase?

    3- Where is the bomb vest the older suspect wore?

    4- Where are the bomb making materials (not firecrackers) and tools the Tsarnaev brothers used to construct the bombs?

    5- Where is the surveillance footage of the Tsarnaev brothers placing the bombs?

    6- What’s amazing and not very credible is that the younger brother was able to jump into an SUV and drive away from a shootout with Boston Police, FBI, DHS, ATF and SWAT, is he Chuck Norris or what??

    7- Where are the dash cam and helicopter videos of the high speed chase and bloody fight that took place between the two Tsarnaev brothers and the Boston Police, FBI, DHS, ATF and SWAT agencies?

    • Vostro says

      Mar 22, 2015 at 11:12 am

      #8 What mosque did they “worship” at?

    • gravenimage says

      Mar 22, 2015 at 2:04 pm

      The repulsive shabeer_hassan wrote:

      It seems that the Israeli Mossad terrorists of the Boston Bombings are now almost clearly identified by the face and person. 3 female Israeli agents included…
      …………………………….

      More grotesque “Truther” crap. These Taqiyya-spewing morons who claim that 9/11 and the Boston Marathon Jihad terror bombing were “inside jobs”, never quite say whether they are claiming that all *25,000+* Jihad terror attacks were actually pulled off by Mossad, or poor old George Bush, or whoever, to “make Islam look bad”—including those perpetrated deep in Dar-al-Islam?

      For instance, was the woman beaten to death and burned in Kabul for allegedly burning a Qur’an actually done away with by “Zionists”? sarc/off

      In addition, none of this explains, if this were so, why so many pious Muslims celebrate these Jihad terror attacks with dancing in the streets and handing out sweets. If these were the acts of “perfidious Jooooos”, then why would Muslims celebrate them?

      But shabeer hassan knows this is bullsh*t, since he has condoned Muslim conquest and enslavement her many times. He just hopes we “filthy Infidels” are bone stupid.

      More:

      strong evidences for the Boston LIE:

      1- The Israeli FBI took a college professor’s mobile phone…
      …………………………….

      There is no “Israeli FBI”. What does shabeer hassan even mean here? Is he instead referring to Mossad? Is he referring to a Jewish FBI agent? Does he mean that the FBI agent was also with Mossad?

      In any case, he may believe, per the Hadith, that “rocks and trees” will call out Jews in hiding, but how would he identify these supposed figures as Jewish? I doubt he will ever answer that question—Muslims are not long on logic.

      More:

      The Boston Bombings were another 9/11! They were an inside government job! See proofs of the older brother getting captured ALIVE and taken away. He wasn’t killed and found dead as they claimed. The two brothers were framed. They used to work for the FBI, and they got framed:
      …………………………….

      First claim I’ve seen that the Tsarnaev brothers worked for the FBI. Why would the FBI be interested in hiring a pair of under-employed, drug dealing Jihadi losers? Why would it be necessary for the brothers to have worked for the FBI at all in order to be “framed”? shabeer hassan is just throwing sh*t at the wall here, hoping something will stick.

      And once again, this creep claims that 9/11 was an “inside government job”. Of course, this actually contradicts what he said earlier in this same post, where he claimed the conspirators were “Israeli”. As I noted, Muslims are *not* long on logic, nor do they care about being rationally consistent.

      More:

      Boston Unanswered Questions:

      5- Where is the surveillance footage of the Tsarnaev brothers placing the bombs?
      …………………………….

      None of these are mysteries, as shabeer hassan pretends. Just taking this one point, most of us likely have seen the video of the Tsarnaev’s placing one of the bombs near the two little children. The 8-year-old boy was killed in the blast, and his 6-year-old sister lost a leg.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqaGJ50Cz7o

      Is shabeer hassan going to claim that this was not Tsarnaev at all, but a female “Israeli FBI” agent in disguise?

      The fact is that the evidence against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is so overwhelming that he is not even bothering to claim that he did not do the bombings.

      This is why, in fact, the defense is stooping to trying to manipulate the jury pool, hoping they can find enough people who can be manipulated into feeling sorry for the kind of killer who would mass murder civilians—including children—at a peaceful foot race.

    • Beagle says

      Mar 22, 2015 at 2:14 pm

      The Islamic Random Conspiracy Generator Bot 3000 is now operational!

      Thanks for showing how insane Trutherism is.

    • Champ says

      Mar 22, 2015 at 2:46 pm

      The Boston Bombings were another 9/11! They were an inside government job!

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

      Uh-huh, sure it was, shabeer …and muhammad was a true prophet from God, as well.

    • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

      Mar 22, 2015 at 9:00 pm

      Alas Shabeer! Off your meds again!

      I thought you were warned last time-if you don’t remain compliant the officers will come again and put you into that nice comfy straitjacket.

      Now try to behave.

  20. Aton says

    Mar 22, 2015 at 4:39 am

    If justice is blind (ie: blind to who the person is) then the jury should be blind too (ie: blind to who the juror is.) I had no idea that the courts could be so selective.

    Does this mean that in a race trial, they can select people of one race?
    Does this mean that in a a bitter divorce case, they can select all women?
    Does this mean that in a bank robbery case, they can select only anti-capitalist protestors?

    The possibilities for fraudulently ‘loading’ the jury are endless, if you can ask such questions.

    Aton

    • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

      Mar 22, 2015 at 8:55 pm

      The possibilities would be ‘endless’ Aton, but for the fact that both sides have exactly the same amount/type of challenges.

      Now it’s certainly true, tho’, that if you’re very wealthy and can hire a great defense team, you’re advantaged. The State/Gov’t. always has the $/resources-the defense, not so much.

  21. Peggy says

    Mar 22, 2015 at 7:22 am

    Forget 101 question. They should only ask one. Are you a Muslim?
    If you answer yes then you’re in.
    Why waste time with anything else. We all know that they want Muslim friendly jurors.

    • Vostro says

      Mar 22, 2015 at 11:24 am

      Where are the prosecutors in all of this? Don’t they have input as to what questions are asked of potential jurors? And…of course the the defense would love to select all muslims to the jury, BUT the prosecutors again can reject jurors hopefully leading to a fair selection. Theoretically there are “checks and balances.” Maybe Kathy Brown or Wellington could shed some light on this.

      • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

        Mar 22, 2015 at 9:07 pm

        The prosecutors are all there, Vostro. They’re giving as good as they get; usually better, given the advantages the state has.

        But all the defense has to do, really, is find one juror. Just one. Who holds out, who won’t convict. Then you’ve got a hung jury and a mistrial. No doubt you saw the recent example of Jodie Arias, in the death-penalty phase of the trial? She didn’t get death, all because just one juror wouldn’t give it to her.

        It’s really hard to re-try a case [successfully] ; the defense knows from the first trial, what the prosecutor’s have, and their strategy. But the prosecution will surely re-try this one if-God forbid-there’s a hung jury.

    • voegelinian says

      Mar 22, 2015 at 2:56 pm

      Dhimmis are just as good — quite faithful to their Muslim Masters. The West has tens of millions of citizens evolving in enthusiastic (albeit witless) anticipation of this higher state of being, more compassionate, more appreciative of “diversity”, more gravely mindful of their own Western guilt at mistreating the Other.

  22. Beagle says

    Mar 22, 2015 at 2:06 pm

    The defense team is focusing all its energy on the ultimate penalty phase which will be a mini trial determining whether Joker gets the death penalty. The defense team already conceded Joker was one of the terrorists who attacked the Boston Marathon. This entire trial is basically about life in prison or death.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Hoi Polloi on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • OLD GUY on Why so many Muslims can’t wait for Biden to get inaugurated
  • gravenimage on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • OLD GUY on Biden vows to surrender to Iran, then negotiate
  • Peter Clemerson on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.