“Our swords will soon, God willing, reach the Nuseiries and their allies like Bashar and his party.” If they do, will Obama congratulate the Islamic State for taking out the despised Assad?
“Islamic State Group Beheads 8 Shiites in Syria’s Hama,” Associated Press, March 29, 2015:
BEIRUT — A new video released by the Islamic State group on Sunday shows its fighters cutting off the heads of eight men said to be Shiite Muslims. The video posted on social media said the men were beheaded in the central Syrian province of Hama.
The video could not be immediately independently verified, but it appeared genuine and corresponded to other AP reporting of the events. The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights also said that the video was authentic.
IS has beheaded scores of people since capturing large parts of Iraq and Syria last year in a self-declared caliphate.
In the video, the men, wearing orange uniforms with their hands tied behind their backs, were led forward in a field by teenage boys. They were then handed over to a group of IS fighters. A boy wearing a black uniform hands out knives to the fighters, who then behead the hostages.
An Islamic State fighter speaks in the video, using a derogatory term for Shiites and calling them “impure infidels.” The IS fighter said in the video that the current military campaign against IS will only make the militant group stronger.
“Our swords will soon, God willing, reach the Nuseiries and their allies like Bashar and his party,” the man said referring to Syrian President Bashar Assad and Lebanon’s militant Hezbollah group that is fighting on his side. The word Nuseiry is a derogatory term to refer to Assad’s Alawite sect, an offshoot of Shiite Islam….
JamesonRocks says
“In the video, the men, wearing orange uniforms with their hands tied behind their backs, were led forward in a field by teenage boys. They were then handed over to a group of IS fighters. A boy wearing a black uniform hands out knives to the fighters, who then behead the hostages.”
So… The “teenage boys” would be moderate moozies and the “IS fighters” would be radical moozies. Yes, that’s it… Hmmm…
Mirren10 says
rezali, rezali, paging rezali !
But of course, that is nonsense. rezali. no more than will ‘David’ the baihai apologist for all the bloody atrocities committed by mohammedans, will never actually ever admit and acknowledge that the sole grounding for all this blood lust and evil, is in the character and personality of the vile mohammed., and those evil fools who choose to follow such a monster .
Wellington says
Agreed, Mirren. The rot in Islam and whatever has branched off from Islam begins with Mohammed. He is the anti-Jesus, the anti-Buddha, the anti-Lao-Tzu, the anti-Confucius and so on. No one with a character like Mohammed’s has any business founding a major religion or ethical system. The fact that such a character like Mohammed did is a sterling example, perhaps the best one of them all, of how evil can on occasion slip through the cracks of time and man’s consciousness and pose quite effectively as something benevolent.
Hope you and yours are doing well, Mirren. Always a pleasure to read your posts. Take care.
Jerry says
Suggestion:
The expression “the rot in Islam”
should rather be read:
“the rot is Islam”
Mac-101 says
Has anyone detected an American Policy which favors Shite or Sunni over the one or other? I used to think that it was Sunni. But wasn’t sure when Obola deep dat VERY deep bow to the Saudi King. Was it real? Was Obola payin homage to the “Guardian of the Holy Sites”, or was mockin him?.
Ed says
It seems to me that Mr. Barrak Hussain favors Shia or is from Shia descent, hence the railroading the path to Iran Nuke bombs.
John says
Believe it or not, this atrocity will be cited as “proof” by Islamic apologists that the extremists have nothing to do with Islam, since they are killing other muslims. But the truth is, the killers are convinced their victims are NOT true muslims, which is why they feel justified in killing them.
Ed says
The muslims can only allow one caliphate, shia or sunni, the prevailing one will kill the other sect.
RG says
Isn’t it incredible how that muslims actually believe that the simple recitation of the muslim creed, the “shahada”, somehow exonerates a man from all evil acts. It’s like a ‘get-out-of-jail-free’ card. Of course, the same does not apply for women, which can be ‘honor killed’ for any perceived offense – real or imaginary. So naturally, all muslim men are unabashed prima donnas! They’re the untouchables – accountable to no man, not even God, because he, allah, (in their warped theology), has declared their every act as “pure”! In other words, ANYTHING GOES – murder, rape, stealing, beheading, cursing, lying, torturing – IT’S ALL PERMISSIBLE AND CONSIDERED RIGHTEOUS once a muslim man declares himself a “believer” in allah and he recites the muslim creed (shahada)! WOW! HOW EVIL IS THAT!?!?
PRCS says
“Isn’t it incredible how that muslims actually believe that the simple recitation of the muslim creed, the “shahada”, somehow exonerates a man from all evil acts.”
And with the exception of this 1400 year old squabble about who SHOULD have succeeded Muhammad upon his death (if this Muhammad dude actually did exist), they all think alike. They all read the same ‘version’ of the Qur’an (though RS notes–as I recall–that the Shi’a–despite their denials–have two extra chapters). They each hate the other. Everything “revealed” by “Allah” applies to every Muslim “man”. The barbarities are the same (if the situation were reversed, the Shi’a would happily behead Sunni Muslims (and they’d probably both work together in order to murder Ahmadiyya Muslisms. It’s a violent, totalitarian system that no rational personal with the means and ability to escape from would want to live under (well, no rational woman, at least).
Ed says
“WOW! HOW EVIL IS THAT!?!?”
Their religion is purely demonic. What they call “allah” is the real satan, ‘the great deceiver.’
Joseph says
What I can’t understand is those that are to be executed sit there passively and wait for it.
If I was them I would be kicking and screaming my head off(no pun intended) Also if these people know what happens to the captives why don’t they fight to the death. If I were to live over there I would have a sidearm on me at ALL times. It is not like there is a shortage of weapons over there.
I was about to eat lunch; looks like I am going to wait awhile. These barbarians make me sick to my stomach, they don’t deserve to be called human beings. How can the world sit back, watch this happen and then have the audacity to import this crap into their own country putting the indigenous people at risk.
I will not trust any Muslim anytime anywhere, I like my head right where it is.
Peggy says
The reason they sit calmly could be that they are broken, know that if they buck they will be beaten and still killed but maybe a far worse method will be used.
They could even be given drugs to keep them quiet. God knows what they do to those poor people.
Now if those same Muslims killed non Muslims before they were captured, I am sure they didn’t go about it in a humane way too.
Joseph says
Thanks Peggy & Mac-101
Sure getting gut shot is not the best way to go but it beats beheading by a mile. There is also the dignity and honor side of it. To die like an animal? BY AN ANIMAL?
I really can’ judge though for I don’t know the FULL story.
These are awful bipedal creatures; there is no getting around that fact.
Lee Hicks says
Remember, the divisions that we see in Islam are derived from the divisions in the Arab mindset as well. God told Hagar that Ishmael would be a wild man, with his hand against every man and theirs against him. The Arab peoples are descendants of Ishmael, and live up to that division definition to a tee. In fact, the word used for divided when describing the divided feet of the statue of kingdoms was literally the word “arab”.
To show how unreasonably prone to violence and rebellion Allah and his followers are, there is a fairly minor difference between Sunni and Shia Muslims, and it basically derives from the disagreement as to where Muslim leadership should come from, descendants of Mohammad or descendants of his associates. That is the main reason that Muslims are killing Muslims, as in the article.
This is one of the reasons that the Mahdi/Antichrist will not be the absolute world dictator that many expect him to be. He will be fighting wars for the entire seven years, not only with other nations, but with Muslims as well, due to the divided nature of the Arab mindset. It will be chaotic seven years, not only due to the massive natural disasters and judgments that the world will face, but also due to the fact that even the Caliphate of the Antichrist will be quarreling with and killing one another, right up to the battle of Armageddon.
In the type of violence that we see here and daily in the news from militant Islamist factions, we see Satan using the same violent influence through Allah that he did with Alla from Babylon.
Not only will there be no real peace possible between Islam and non-Islamic peoples, but there will be no peace even among competing Islamic factions and groups.
Jay Boo says
“Impure”???
They all follow Muhammad and the child sex slave religion.
Go figure.
PRCS says
Note: “impure infidels” as opposed to pure infidels.
Amazing, ain’t it.
Westman says
How long before the Iranians start bringing their tech weapons to test them under real conditions against the ISIS beheaders?
Reading accounts of the Vietnam War, there was the precedence of testing post WWII developed weapons in the early days of US involvement.
This fight in Syria must be very tempting to Iran for the testing of post 8-years-war developed weaponry. It could change the balance of the Syrian war and leave Assad in power.
The Ayatollah stated very plainly to Iran’s citizens that they would only negotiate on nuclear issues and not on any regional interests. He might as well have said they will be expanding the reach of Iran.