Nick Lowles, stand up and take a bow. You too, Fiyaz Mughal. It was far-Left organizations such as Tell Mama and Hope Not Hate that stigmatized people who called attention to the Muslim rape gangs as “racists” and “bigots.” They made it impossible (and still do) for Britain to have an honest public discussion of Islamic supremacism and the permissibility of using Infidel women as sex slaves (cf. Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50).
Political correctness has been the ruin of modern Britain. The only thing lying ahead for the U.K. now is chaos and bloodshed.
“British Girls Raped by Muslim Gangs on ‘Industrial Scale,'” by Soeren Kern, Gatestone Institute, March 17, 2015:
Nearly 400 British girls as young as eleven are believed to have been sexually exploited by Muslim rape gangs in Oxfordshire over the past 15 years, according to a chilling new report. It charges local officials with repeatedly ignoring the abuse due to a “culture of denial.”
The scale of the abuse in Oxfordshire, a county in southeast England, mirrors similarly shocking accounts of the sexual exploitation of white British girls by Muslim gangs in Bristol, Derby, Rochdale, Rotherham and Telford, and implies that the problem is not isolated, but endemic.
The 133-page Serious Case Review (SCR) was published on March 3, the same day that British Prime Minister David Cameron convened the so-called Downing Street Abuse Summit, during which he unveiled a raft of new measures aimed at bringing more offenders to justice.
The report — which reveals that there are “grounds for believing” that 373 girls have been sexually exploited by gangs in Oxfordshire since 2004 — focuses on the accounts of six girls and their contact with the authorities. The girls were the victims in the “Operation Bullfinch” trial, in which seven Muslims were found guilty, in May 2013, of trafficking and raping the girls between 2004 and 2012.
According to the SCR, between 2005 and 2010, the six girls were reported missing 500 times — half of those when they were in the care of official child protection agencies — but authorities never bothered to investigate.
In Section 2, the report includes extracts of the Prosecution’s opening speech at the trial in order to “focus the mind” on the suffering endured by the girls. The men would “ply the girls with alcohol and introduce them to drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, ‘crack’ and sometimes heroin. The girls became addicted to certain of the drugs and felt unable to live without them. This made them even more dependent on the men.”
It continues:
“Sometimes the men would also exercise extreme physical and sexual violence on the girls and threaten them that should they ever seek to free themselves from the grasp of the group they and/or their families would suffer serious harm.
“The defendants took the girls to other places, usually hotels/guest houses or empty private dwellings, for other men to have sex with them, again often in groups and often in return for money which was paid to the men and not the girls.
“Most of the men engaged in the sexual abuse of the young girls did so over many years. Each was much older than any of the girls and of an age to know precisely what he was doing; the harm he was inflicting on the girls; the fact of their suffering and that their activity was illegal and in many instances depraved. In short, their conduct was intentional and persistent. Many of the sexual acts committed on the girls were extreme in their depravity. The girls were usually given so many drugs that they were barely aware of what was going on. Indeed, they say that it was the only way they could cope with what was going on.
“The sexual abuse included vaginal, anal and oral rape and also involved the use of a variety of objects such as knives, meat cleavers, baseball bats… sex toys…. It was often accompanied by humiliating and degrading conduct such as biting, scratching, acts of urinating, being… suffocated, tied up. They were also beaten and burnt. This sexual activity was often carried out by groups of men; sometimes it would go on for days on end.
“The places to which the girls were taken were often private houses and guest houses in Oxford. Some of the private houses appeared to be empty and used solely for the purposes of the abuse. The men who came to pay to have sex with the girls were not always from Oxford; many travelled from far afield, places such as Bradford, Leeds, London and Slough. It seems they came specifically to sexually abuse young girl, often by appointment with the men in Oxford who had dominated the girls.
“Between acts of abuse sometimes stretching over a number of days, the Oxford men ensured girls were guarded so that they could not escape. In addition to being abused in various locations in Oxford, some of the girls were taken to other towns and cities such as London and Bournemouth for the same purpose.”
Section 3 of the SCR shows how local authorities could have stopped the abuse as early as 2005, but failed to do so because they refused to take the girls’ complaints seriously. The report includes dozens of comments the girls made during interviews, including:
“I turned up at the police station at 2/3am, blood all over me, soaked through my trousers to the crotch. They dismissed it as me being naughty, a nuisance.”
“Why would a 13-year-old make it up?”
“The social worker just wanted to hear what [the worker] wanted to hear so there was no need to do anything….”
“The Police never asked me why — they just took me home.”
“I thought if I told the Police what was really happening they would not believe me, and they would not arrest them and then… they did not do anything and that made me think that nothing could be done.”
“I made a complaint about a man who trafficked me from a children’s home. He was arrested, released and trafficked me again.”
“Oxford and another council argued about me to try and avoid doing anything. It wasn’t my fault I was abused.”
“Social services washed their hands — ‘it’s your choice’ I was told.”
“A WPC [woman police constable] found me drunk with men. I said I was ok and she went away and left me with them. I was abused that night.”
The SCR also shows that parents were exasperated at the lack of concern displayed by police and social workers, who often blamed the girls for the situation they were facing. Parental comments include:
“Police wouldn’t pursue anyone unless they had a cast iron case.”
“No one thought about us — what it would be like if it was their daughter.”
“Police wouldn’t tell us addresses so we could go and bring her home.”
“She was a minor but we were told it wasn’t our business.”
“I tried to tell social services about the evidence — but they weren’t interested. It was obvious it was something sexual.”
“A big chunk of her life has been taken away — when she should have been at the youth club or skating or the school prom — all that went missing because of them: the perpetrators and the police/social services for not stopping it when they knew.”
“It’s in my mind all the time — what happened to my ‘baby’ and what I did because I didn’t understand what was happening to me. They knew what was happening to her and didn’t tell me.”
“Why did they let it go on during the long investigation?”
“No one spoke to us about dealing with the people responsible.”
“The police said she didn’t appear in danger, they said she was happy to be there, and refused to tell me where she was.”
“Giving her a cuddle and taking her to MacDonald’s was the [social worker’s] solution.”
“One manager said [before the exploitation was understood] ‘She’s streetwise, and loves it.'”
“[After a theft was investigated where a girl was with older men] The issue for the police was the burglary, not a 13-year-old with older men.”
“At interagency meetings attended no one kept any records/minutes, and there were never agendas.”
“The Children’s Home didn’t tell me when she went missing.”
“I despaired of ever getting an appropriate response that stood alongside us and didn’t try to blame and shame us.”
And yet the report holds no one responsible or accountable. It blames the failure to act on a “lack of knowledge” and “organizational failings.” The report concludes:
“The Serious Case Review (SCR) has seen no evidence of willful professional neglect or misconduct by organizations, but there was at times a worrying lack of curiosity and follow through, and much work should have been considerably different and better. There is little evidence that the local understanding of child sexual exploitation (CSE), or how to tackle it once identified, was significantly different from many parts of the country.
“On the surface, many of the illustrations described in the report can seem like professional ineptitude, unconcern, or inaction. They become more understandable when put in the context of the knowledge and processes at the time, practical difficulties around evidence, and a professional mind-set which could not grasp that the victims’ ability to say ‘no’ had been totally eroded.
“The overall problem was not grasping the nature of the abuse—the grooming, the pull from home, the erosion of consent, the inability to escape and the sheer horror of what the girls were going through—but of seeing it as something done more voluntarily. Something that the girls did as opposed to something done to them.”
According to the Telegraph, local authorities across Britain are expending “considerable intellectual effort” into finding reasons not to conduct mandatory public investigations into child sexual abuse out of a fear of “negative publicity.”
An investigation cited by the paper found more than 30 instances where local authorities refused to conduct a Serious Case Review, which is required by law whenever a child is seriously harmed as a result of abuse. When investigations were conducted, in many cases the reports failed to examine how “fear, overwork, timidity, willful blindness and over-optimism” had led social workers to make bad decisions.
Speaking at a summit on child exploitation on March 3, Prime Minister Cameron said British social workers are in need of “a massive dose of common sense.” Reading a quote from the report, he said:
“One does not need training in child sexual exploitation to know that a 12-year-old sleeping with a 25-year-old is not right, or that you don’t come home drunk, bruised, half-naked and bleeding from seeing your ‘friends’.”
Cameron added:
“I think it’s very important we take a step back and just recognize the horrific nature of what has happened in our country. Young girls — and they are young girls — being abused over and over again on an industrial scale, being raped, being passed from one bunch of perpetrators to another bunch of perpetrators. And all the while this has happened with too many organizations and too many people walking on by. And we have got to really resolve that this stops here, it doesn’t happen again and we recognize abuse for what it is.”
Under new plans announced at the summit, the government will seek to extend the crime of “willful neglect” that was recently introduced to protect the elderly in nursing homes to protect children from sexual predators. This would require teachers, social workers, police and elected officials to act on suspicions of child sexual abuse or face up to five years in prison. The new law would apply to all levels of the bureaucracy, from low- and mid-level employees to the most senior managers and directors.
Some observers are skeptical about the effectiveness of Cameron’s plan. In an interview with Sky News, Conservative Party MP Tim Loughton, a former parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Children and Families, had this to say about the Oxfordshire report:
“A ‘worrying lack of curiosity’ is a very charitable way of saying ‘clear incompetence and neglect’ that went on in various agencies within the children’s services department, within the social services and within the police in Oxfordshire.”
Loughton added that under the new law, “willful neglect” will be a high bar to prove. Prosecutors would need to show that authorities were “proactively obstructing people coming forward with allegations” and that there was “a conspiracy of cover-up or silence.”
British commentator Simon Kent is equally pessimistic. He writes:
“It is a fact teachers, councilors, police, NHS [National Health Service] staff and social workers in England and Wales have categorically failed to protect young children from sexual predators for a generation.
“Systemic failures have been condoned with silence, serial bunglers rewarded with promotion and whistle blowers shunned. Why is anything going to change now, after the event(s)?
“It will be years before David Cameron’s intentions are fully acted upon. All the while the abuse will continue, to the eternal shame of those who have the power but not the ideological or intestinal fortitude to stop it.”
Kent concludes: “Too little, too late. That’s just not good enough.”
Linde Barrera says
This article shows the creepy, disgusting, vile side of Islam AND the apathy of the government. I am not a litigious person, nor do i know about laws in the UK, but can these girls or their parents bring lawsuits against their attackers and their government? I hope they win, and that a lot of people go to jail.
Michael Warden says
Yes they can. It is being done in other areas but just what the result will be is anyone’s guess. No amount of money extracted from these individuals and organisations would be quite as effective as a short surgical operation with a blunt knife and a length of rope.
jayell says
What I’d like explained is why those in authority have just stood by and allowed these muslims to go around like hordes of uncouth medieval foreign invaders, raping and pillaging as if they’ve just conquered the place. It seems like those who should be in control of these have just assumed this ‘defeat’ mentality like quisling collaborators. I wonder if something similar would have happened if the Nazis had invaded in 1940?
Eli says
Oh gosh, one cannot simply upset one’s muslims. They are sacrosanct and a protected species. So, abuse of children and others, particularly Jews, will continue. It will only get worse.
jayell says
‘Protected species’ are they indeed?? Why? Because they’re in danger of extinction? Funny, I was hoping for just that!
Brian Hoff says
Well the Nazie did occuprate apart of the UK in WWII they occuprate the Channel Islands the Germany soilders where well beahavior as the native where consider apart of the Master race. The Mason builting where wrech as the Nazie didnot like Mason than evil secret societly.
gravenimage says
“Brian Hoff” (really, “DefenderofIslam”) wrote:
Well the Nazie did occuprate apart of the UK in WWII they occuprate the Channel Islands the Germany soilders where well beahavior as the native where consider apart of the Master race. The Mason builting where wrech as the Nazie didnot like Mason than evil secret societly.
……………………………
Why is the vile “Brian Hoff” ranting approvingly about the Nazis here? The idea that they were “well beahavior” in the Channel Islands is utter rot, unless he considers rounding up and shipping off Jews to death camps “well beahavior”…oh, wait a minute—he’s a Muslim, *of course* he would consider murdering Jews good behavior.
And, one may wonder, what does any of this have to do with Muslim rape gangs? I don’t know, unless it is that he is trying to convince us that being ruled by Muslims would be every bit as benign as being occupied by the Nazis, and—God help us—he is probably quite right about that…
Marty says
I agree 100%.
What still shocks me is that thousands of young girls in the UK are annually subject to the crime of
Female Genital Mutilation.
This is the crime of Grievous Bodily Harm under Common Law, as well as being made illegal by Labour, whose government has caused such massive damage at home and abroad.
The one and only prosecution so far was against a doctor who tried to patch up mutilations caused by savages.
Naturally it failed.
Every girl should be warned of this from whenever they can understand English, and small children should be examined by nurses on a monthly basis to ensure savages have not attempted to violate
them.
gravenimage says
And Marty, there has not been a *single* prosecution in Britain for FGM. This is utterly shameful.
voegelinian says
Sure; however, what the Mainstream West (and even many in the Counter-Jihad still) don’t seem to grasp is that this is not merely a crime wave, it is also a (para-)military maneuver, utilizing a special form of Jihad, to supplement the jihad bil saif (jihad of the sword), jihad bil qalam (jihad of the pen), jihad bil lisan (jihad of the tongue — i.e., taqiyya & propaganda) — here, the jihad bil malakat aymanukum (jihad of the right hand possessions; cf., Koran 4:24) (i.e., sex slaves taken from among the Harbi during war (and for the Mohammedan, it is always war, all of history before the End Times is war.)
Criminality is merely one mode of warfare for Islam, under the more general category of the Violent Jihad jihad bil saif (jihad of the sword); other modes are civil unrest and terrorism (which, in turn, has several different flavors), which is the Bad Cop complemented by the Good Cop of the Stealth Jihad (whose two major modes are the jihad bil lisan (jihad of the tongue — i.e., taqiyya & propaganda, including false assimilation and the false moderate), along with the jihad bil hijra (jihad of immigration).
I.e., a protracted military invasion is occurring, and has been occurring for decades. The longer the West waits to deport all Muslims, the costlier, messier, and bloodier will be the logical eventuality of deportation. Silly me, but I’d like my West to minimize as much money, trouble, and blood as we possibly can. Many (if not most) in the Counter-Jihad, for some baffling reason (well, not really — PC MC is just that psychologically and culturally powerful in its ability to enculturate in subtle ways and in its effects on the heart & mind) continue to disagree with me.
Kevin Walker says
You got a strong point over here, and I agree with you. I’ve been saying the same now for several years and many though quite versed with the islamic issue are unable to realize the gravity of situation & the most viable solution to avoid unnecessary bloodshed & the huge cost to the society. They know there’s a problem but instead of fixing the problem with the most simple & effective solution they are in fact aggravating it by importing more of these mohammedans, as we’ve seen in Canada the muslim population has almost tripled in last 10 years and the current government is actually boasting this fact as to show how multicultural & open minded the Canadians are.
Darren says
So the muslim population has tripled in 10 years in Canada that is very alarming. Canada is very weak against jihad of the womb and immigration jihad, besides the usual stealth jihadist tactics that the west has no defense or counter against. I’ve been worried that they would take advantage of a glaring weakness Canada has, and has no defense against, well they do have a defense, but sadly your leftist 5th column will go along with their would be colonists.
Due to your low population spread out over a large geo graphic area, it would not be hard to gain a large foot hold in Canada rather quickly, then if you top that off with the other stealth jihadist strategies like infiltrating and subverting institutions using money to buy silence or support, think of Saudi money going into universities and what not, you have a very potent recipe for conquest.
Settle into an area make it muslim friendly, ally yourself with the left who will encourage the immigration flood gates to be opened, while simply out breeding the native population, and what’s worse the infidel nation will pay for your 10 children in the form of welfare. After you establish a power center by simply making up the majority of an area, you also get your own people into positions of power, both at the local and state/federal level.
After your people are elected you can further subvert the country’s political process not to mention various institutions that much easier. Rinse repeat and sooner rather than later you have carved out a state within a state. Due to the low population Canada has this wouldn’t take much time in the grand scheme of things. I feel Australia also suffers from this glaring weakness. We have the wrong mindset, we need to recognize we are in a war of civilizations and start thinking in those terms, the enemy does as evidenced by this.
http://counterjihadreport.com/tag/holy-land-foundation-trial/
The Muslim Brotherhood’s Strategic Plan For America – Court Document
http://www.clarionproject.org/Muslim_Brotherhood_Explanatory_Memorandum#
Page 4:
“Enablement of Islam in North America, meaning: establishing an effective and a stable Islamic Movement led by the Muslim Brotherhood which adopts Muslims’ causes domestically and globally, and which works to expand the observant Muslim base, aims at unifying and directing Muslims’ efforts, presents Islam as a civilization alternative, and supports the global Islamic State wherever it is.”
Page 5:
“…the Movement must plan and struggle to obtain “the keys” and the tools of this process in carry out [sic] this grand mission as a ‘Civilization Jihadist’ responsibility.”
Page 7:
“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers…”
“[W]e must possess a mastery of the art of ‘coalitions’, the art of ‘absorption’ and the principles of ‘cooperation.’”
Page 18:
“A list of our organizations and the organizations of our friends” – This is where the Muslim Brotherhood listed its front groups in the U.S.. Note that prominent organizations like CAIR, ISNA, ICNA and others are named here.
Demsci says
Voegelinian, you impress me (often) with your insight in enemy-strategy and deep logic. Also I see you function as a good watchdog. I was also impressed by your post on the other thread yesterday and thinking about it the whole day off and on.
Let us see 3 parties: The Muslims, they know what they are FOR, taking the initiative; sort of PROtagonists. If we look into their minds, we see many primitive thoughts, BUT what they want is still monumental; the WHOLE world. Question; What if they win a few parts here and there, and then run up to even more ruthless enemies; the Chinese and Russians???
But also the remnants of the West, this time very hostile, as intelligent, well armed and well organised as in WWII? Isn’t the quest of the Muslims essentially hopeless? Let us make them see this.
Question; Is it wise for the Muslim supremacists, be they in Teheran or Racca or elsewhere to be so patient, is there perhaps SOMETHING growing in the West that eventually makes Islam irrelevant, like Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, 2 billion smartphones, a new smarter generation of freedom loving people????
THEY, the Islam-supremacists, should be warned that their “window of opportunity to conquer the world” might well be closing soon.
Second group; Counterjihadists, the Antagonists in this drama. Motley disparate crew. But alert, growing, thinking, developing, promising?
Third group; the majority, “neutrals” for all intents and purposes. Your “epiphany” seemed to be that THEY are the real problem for the Antagonists; they are sleeping, pampering and defending Muslims against it’s antagonists, accepting more and more of them in numbers and concessions.AND installing keeping the PCMC Media and Politicians in power and business.
And now I read you talking about your “beloved West” and “minimizing costs” for it?
I am still raw in my thinking about this and it may still sound impractical, but here comes:
That “neutral majority” and that territory of Europe, well, why save that “dead horse” at all costs??? Against the will of this majority? Why, it is not even democratic! They bring whatever misery the Muslims inflict on them really on themselves in a way.
And…. can’t a part of us, in future, not become PROTAGONISTS? Meaning that we organise well OUR MIG-texts? Most Important Guidelines. Pro Democracy, Enlightenment and various inspirational themes, under some common Umbrella?
Then we at first would be a minority, and our antagonists would be Muslims. The majority would still be neutral, but now in a position to choose sides between 2 kinds of PROTAGONISTS; with 2 MIG-texts. True loyal democratic people and Muslims; Constitution-Enlightenment-etc against Quran-Sunnah (really no contest in quality, but then again; Islam is like a virus isn’t it?).
The situation now; the counterjihadists, including you, seem only ANTAGONISTS, intent of going back to normal should the Islamic threat subside (through a meteor perhaps). But this threat could be used as catalyst for a minority to finally realise again what it is FOR, in the 21st century. If need be only on a PART of current Western territory.
If the by now probable showdown comes; Let us not feel responsible anymore for the whole society of the West, only for it’s positive essence, not for it’s whole territory at all costs, but for territories with MAJORITIES of true loyal Democratic Citizens.
Wishing you all the best, Demsci.
voegelinian says
Demsci,
I don’t see the problem of Islam as a threat of conquest; but rather of the danger of their attempts to conquer — which, even if they fail (which is likely), they will manage to mass-murder hundreds of thousands (if not a few million) of us. My main concern is to minimize this as much as possible. The best way is to deport Muslims.
Joe Shmo says
“But also the remnants of the West, this time very hostile, as intelligent, well armed and well organised as in WWII? Isn’t the quest of the Muslims essentially hopeless? Let us make them see this.
“THEY, the Islam-supremacists, should be warned that their “window of opportunity to conquer the world” might well be closing soon.”
These are good points, and it might be worth advising them, assuming that the Muslim supremacists, religious fanatics that they are, are rational and can be reasoned with. But I don’t think they are or can be.
Demsci says
Thanks Voegelinian and Joe Shmo, for responding and so informative too.
Voegelinian, I know it sounds terrible, but …… If they are likely to FAIL conquering us, for me that’s it! Great. Democratic nations no longer fight each other, but these primitive totalitarians will “clubber” is, but we, civilized mankind, will, probably, win in the end, perhaps being in better shape than we were.
Oh, don’t take the weight of protection too serious on your shoulder I am inclined to say. The Muslims and Policors bring the destruction of Millions about, and on themselves, not you. You did your duty, but there was only so much you were/ are allowed to do. Who knows, the probably coming carnage will be good for something.
Joe Shmo, I see your point about irrational Muslims, but maybe we will have a difficult time and then, game over for them. And to relativate; Mexican Drugscartels, mafia’s are also menacing, dreadful.
I just was concerned about total annihilation and subjugation, not about some war, some bloodshed, this sounds strange, but that happens in all of history and statistics show that it is DIMINISHING PER CAPITA. We only can’t make it DISAPPEAR yet.
Thanks again.
gravenimage says
Demsci wrote:
If the by now probable showdown comes; Let us not feel responsible anymore for the whole society of the West, only for it’s positive essence, not for it’s whole territory at all costs, but for territories with MAJORITIES of true loyal Democratic Citizens.
……………………………..
Dear Demsci, I don’t want to cede *any* part of the West to these savage barbarians—and for several reasons. For one thing, I don’t want to see any more Infidels suffer under Islam, and I think that having any part of the West under Muslim control (or even heavy Muslim influence) is bound to make the whole of the West much less safe overall. And their securing *any* of our territory will only embolden them to try to take more.
Of course, if things get bad enough, we may not have a say one way or another.
But personally, I’m not ready to write off even the most dhimmified parts of the West, which—whatever their other problems—are generally civilized places, and essentially cede them to the savages—even if many of their own people are suicidally enabling just that.
I also believe, bad as things are, that it is too early for such defeatism—the most heavily Muslim part of the West is still under 10%.
Damn the barbarians. We should not give them an inch—not without a fight, and without urging good people to stand up for their own values.
voegelinian says
Demsci, yes, I think it’s reasonable to assume that the West will win (where “win” doesn’t mean something so chimerical and fantasy-based as “eliminating Islam” but rather managing the problem, through deportation and global quarantine of Muslims); however, that isn’t so rosy as you make it out. We will still have to worry about minimizing the death toll and destruction of infrastructure on our side — surely, a high, if not the highest, priority in this regard.
voegelinian says
And I should add to my March 18, 2015 at 4:30 pm post that the main (if not the only) impediment to the goal I outlined — of minimizing the death toll and destruction of infrastructure by Muslims against our socieities (and the general trauma of the sidération which the protracted stillicide of Islamic terror will continue to wreak on us) — is, on our side, psychological. We have the physical ability, we have the legal justification; we only lack the resolve which snaps into place as a mass epiphany consequent upon an intelligent connection of the dots.
voegelinian says
And, in addition, I should add to my March 18, 2015 at 4:35 pm postscript by noting that one major barometer demonstrating just how formidable is this psychological impediment of PC MC may be dismayingly gleaned by the static flack and inertia (if not at times outright hostility) even from within the Counter-Jihad which I have encountered (not only here from among the community of Jihad Watch commenters, but also in various other venues throughout the Worldwide Web, oftentimes from Conservatives) when proposing my analysis and diagnosis of the actual nature & dimensions of the problem and, from there, the logic of what must be our optimal response to that problem and the systemic and metastasizing dangers it poses to our societies.
gravenimage says
Drakken wrote:
…You really think that we in the west at some point are going to deport these bloody savages? Not bloody likely, There is no nice civilized way to deal with the muslim problem and their leftist enablers, we will go back to our roots and our DNA will come out to play with a vengeance not seen in 70 years…
………………………………..
Drakken, the Spanish deported most of the Mohammedan invaders, and they did it in a time generally considered less civilized than our own.
As for what happened 70 years ago, one would get the impression from your comments that we killed every last Nazi. Of course, this was not the case at all—we fought their aggression until they surrendered.
I know you have mentioned many times that you eagerly await the return of dark ages savagery, which you consider more in line with our “DNA”.
For most of us here, though,I believe the reason we oppose Islam is *because* we oppose such savagery,
If we are resolute—as those dealing with these Muslim rape gangs certainly *have not been*—then we can counter this Muslim barbarism. We don’t have to discard our values to do so, any more than we did when defeating Fascism.
Spot On says
These people are the scum of Islam and that is as low as it goes.
gravenimage says
I don’t believe they are the scum of Islam, Spot On. It is worse than that—this is just how Muslims behave when they are sufficiently emboldened.
And what could embolden them more than this apathy and worse from those who are supposed to protect their victims?
Charli Main says
” but can these girls or their parents bring lawsuits against their attackers”
There would be no point in these girls suing these Muslim vermin. The only asserts most of this filth have, are their British taxpayer provided benefits cheques.
FREE money is one off the major reasons all these Muslim scum head for Britain.
Unlike most other immigrant communities, Muslims don´t come to Britain to work–they come for their Jizya
Joe Shmo says
A trial would have huge publicity. That would be a good thing in the long run. And hopefully, there would be justice eventually .
Brian Hoff says
BF and EDL are saying that muslim worker from oversea are takeing job in the UK from native UK citizens.
gravenimage says
What is your point? Do you condemn your foul coreligionists using non-Muslim children as sex slaves or do you not? (Not that I expect “DefenderofIslam” to actually answer this question, of course).
Gray says
I understand that the magnificent Gavin Boby’s Law and Freedom Foundation has taken up the cause of the raped and groomed British girls, and, in the process, also done a lot of detailed research on this issue. Please God he perseveres in his legal actions, and makes all those criminally negligent creatures pay for their ‘worrying lack of curiosity.’ BTW do the happy, flag waving throngs still sing about ‘Britons never, never, never shall be slaves’ at the last night of the Proms at the Royal Albert Hall?
PRODOS says
Gray wrote: “…. the magnificent Gavin Boby’s Law and Freedom Foundation has taken up the cause of the raped and groomed British girls …”
Thanks for mentioning that.
Here’s the link:
http://lawandfreedomfoundation.org/
Best Wishes,
PRODOS
Melbourne, Australia
Kepha says
This shows a creepy, disgusting side of post-modern governance, “progressive” thinking, and “evolving” standards. Apparently, abuse of the young is fine as long as it’s done on the sly by one of the Left’s client groups.
Jay Boo says
Just as shocking.
Muslims call the Qur’an a holy book.
KrazyKafir says
This is the same quisling environment that will ensure when the tide finally does turn in the UK to save itself, it will be bloody serious.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
I’ve always said that at its foundation Islam is all about sex, the whole belief system is built around sex. Rape on an industrial scale in a stable society must be programmatic. The program comes from group beliefs impelled by the Holy Ko-Ran and the Sunnah. It is no coincidence that the one thing linking this large group of industrial rapists are all Moslems, it is the cause of it. Except in the public discourse on what happened, and there’s precious little of that. But what there is attributes the industrial rape to coincidence and/or personal Marxian circumstances.
mortimer says
PF wrote: “whole belief system is built around sex”
Indeed. The reward for being Muslim is eternal sex with slaves in the luxurious heavenly pub/brothel.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Yeah, the Holy Prophet knew that motivating people was key to his program’s success, and boy did it succeed. Freud documented what everybody already knew with his theory of Id, the world is made to spin by the urge for the happy slappy. Lotsa success gets a guy lotsa sex. That is the rocket engine propelling Islam.
Bezelel says
The part of it all, IMHO, is equating rape and brutality with sex. If ever there was a hate crime that is more truthfully the nature of the attacks. They only have close relationships with their fellow abusers. islam is still capable of sinking lower, hard to imagine but stay tuned.
gravenimage says
Yes—Islam is the religion of rape.
mortimer says
The REAL BIGOTS are the Muslim rapists.
Jay Boo says
Islam is not all that mysterious.
Islam is not even a force of evil.
Let us not give it more credit and power than it actually has.
Islam itself is not even “The Evil”
Islam is just the KEY to the Pandora’s box of evil.
Islam is a Muslim’s EXCUSE for evil but not the evil itself.
A Muslim is just a human being and no more or less.
I do not wish to minimize the extremely vile nature of this ideology or draw up any false equivalence but Islam is not as unique as it first seems and therefore not as powerful either.
There is of course the obvious comparisons with Nazism.
The way to defeat Islam is to reveal it for what it is by unveiling its pretense.
On a simpler scale I will use Penn State University scandal as an example. The Football program did not directly cause the sexual abuse but it did enable a culture that allowed the administrators to make excuses and a community to look the other way or even turn against the victims for their own selfish reasons knowing full well they would get away with the evil sham if they banded together in an unholy alliance except the scandal grew too big that even the usual cover up tactics could not contain it.
Time has past but has the culture of Penn State truly changed.
Not so much it seems.
Penn State fraternity suspended over nude photos of sleeping women
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/penn-state-fraternity-suspended-over-nude-photos-of-sleeping-women/ar-AA9T33w
The same is true with Islam. Islam promotes a culture.
Islam is not THE EVIL but Islam is the EXCUSE to promote a culture of evil by preying on human weakness.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
A Muslim is just a human being and no more or less.
One with the Pandora’s box open and emitting the vapors of evil into his brain, so definitely less.
Islam is not even a force of evil.
It’s a force of evil, but not the only one. Just the best one, the most successful force for evil. Ever.
Anna says
@ alarmed…yes, true. Even the Byzantines, Persians, and Crusaders were not prepared for these satanic monsters, up until Islam war was nasty but more civil, yes even then, Islam was deceptive sneaky and evil. As Robert says just a war machine ! Giving incentives of enrichment here and hereafter, win-win for these beasts to maim, torture, rape, loot and kill.
gravenimage says
Jay Boo, if I were to make any comparison here with the Penn State football program, it would be with the British police, not Islam.
The two former institutions are not doing enough to stand against evil, and are sometimes even enabling it.
Islam, though, is actually teaching rape and sex slavery and these other atrocities as part of its tenets.
jayell says
“Islam is not THE EVIL but Islam is the EXCUSE to promote a culture of evil by preying on human weakness.”….. Surely if Islam can be an effective factor in promoting a culture of evil by whatever means, and as often as it seems to, then the ‘evil’ must ipso facto be in islam itself???
mortimer says
“Police wouldn’t pursue anyone unless they had a cast iron case.”
Translation: “Police wouldn’t pursue MUSLIMS unless they had a cast iron case against a PAKISTANI MUSLIM.”
Ephesian says
Of course,you all realise don’t you,that this has nothing whatsoever to do with islam,in fact,islam has nothing whatsoever to do with islam…(sarcasm well and truly off).How our so called “leaders” sleep at night is beyond me.Shame on them,shame on them,craven full blown cowards.
Anna says
Yep
watling says
Compare the state’s apparent disinterest in thousands of white girls being sexually abused by Muslim men with the state’s obsession with the three Muslima jihadists from East London who have voluntarily gone off to join the barbaric, bloodthirsty death cult that is Islamic State.
cheesecake says
Muslim child rape gangs when caught get 4 or 5 years in prison.but if you are accused of a racist insult you may get 8 months. When upsetting somebody’s feelings gets more news cover than mass rape you know you country is in trouble.
jay says
Once you start willingly pimping out your women and children to foreign invaders, your culture and society is over.
Darren says
I agree I consider the U.K conquered muslim territory already in this global war of civilizations. The fact the British public aren’t using soccer thug tactics and/or putting on their Punisher T shirts and taking revenge is telling. One of the most heinous kinds of crimes done on a mass scale, and by muslims because of their views on infidels, and infidel women in general, and I don’t even see one mass protest, but if a Jew builds a house in their own land you will see mass protests and calls for boycotts in dhimmi slave state of the Ummah known as the U.K. I wonder what the muslims will rename the U.K once it’s official they have conquered the place.
cs says
They should get together and make a film out of it, a docudrama, showing all the willings and dealings of the whole thing, in order to show the world, the way it is, is really bad, horrible I think.
duh_swami says
If I was one of those girls father, I would open a can of ‘whoop azz’, you know, a little ball bat therapy…But I guess the UK is short of ‘whoop azz’, ball bats, and the will to use them…
gravenimage says
The most appalling thing is that it is not just that the police and social services did not discover this industrial-scale rape—it is that they blew off these girls *when they came to them for help*.
Generally, “at risk” girls—really, teenagers in general—are not all that apt to approach the police. That they did so and were ignored, insulted, and humiliated is *utterly disgusting*.
And while it *might* be understandable is there were one or two reports that police or social services neglected to take seriously, that there were hundreds of reports, all corroborating each other, from many different parts of England and Wales *over the course of years*, is flabbergasting.
And while most of these girls were largely unprotected—runaways, kids in foster or group homes—some of them were not. It seems police were likely to ignore reports from parents and caregivers just as they were from the girls themselves.
Ultimately, this is organized, willful ignoring of these cases.
And when a few officers actually took these reports seriously, they were told to stand down by higher-ups, and focus on issues—I am not kidding—like car crimes:
“UK: police told not to investigate Muslim rape gangs”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/03/uk-police-told-not-to-investigate-muslim-rape-gangs
Ernie says
How many police- officers , politicians , doctors , dentists , businessmen , and other ‘ pillars of the community ‘ were ‘clients ‘ of these girls ? Maybe that’s the most important reason for willfully looking the other way .
gravenimage says
Ernie, I have never read any organized report of who the “clients” were, but in every individual case I’m familiar with the clients—really, rapists—were all Muslims, from the “groomers” to the “customers”.
If anyone here has more information on this, I’d like to hear it.
PRODOS says
gravenimage writes: “… when a few officers actually took these reports seriously, they were told to stand down by higher-ups, and focus on issues—I am not kidding—like car crimes:”
I find this perplexing and staggering.
I’d really like to understand what the decision-making process of the “higher-ups” was.
How did they justify to themselves placing “car crimes” above child abuse?
Was it because “child abuse” was supposed to be handled by some other agency or department?
I’m reluctant to blame the cops as I see them as decent people.
But I really don’t get it. There seem to be a lot of missing pieces in all this. A lot of things that don’t add up.
Best Wishes,
PRODOS
Melbourne, Australia
Joe Shmo says
It’s part of multicultural nation-breaking. It’s the only way I can really explain it.
gravenimage says
PRODOS wrote:
I’m reluctant to blame the cops as I see them as decent people.
…………………………..
I certainly see the rank and file as decent people. And my own grandfather was a police superintendent in the West Midlands.
I’m not sure who was giving the ultimate orders on policy here.
I cannot see how these organized, violent rape gangs *wouldn’t* be a police issue, though, even if the cases were coordinated by social services.
I agree that there still seem to be a lot of unanswered questions. And clearly, the scope is so huge that this was not just a handful of negligent departments. I’m not talking conspiracy—it just seems that there is a nationwide problem here.
I hope they don’t just sack a few low-level functionaries and sweep the problem under the rug.
I also wonder, given how incredibly widespread these grooming gangs have turned out to be, it these crimes are not *still ongoing*.
Kepha says
GraveN:
You mention your grandfather–I suspect he belonged to a Britain of another age, that is rapidly becoming as remote as that of the Duke of Wellington.
As with teachers, no policeman can give what he hasn’t got to begin with. Too many of us were raised to be “men without chests” (to steal a line from C.S. Lewis), and for many, the habit has stuck. My guess is that the nice, post-modern UK likes its officers to be thorough moral relativists solicitous for the clients of whoever yells loudest in the political forum.
gravenimage says
Kepha wrote:
GraveN:
You mention your grandfather–I suspect he belonged to a Britain of another age, that is rapidly becoming as remote as that of the Duke of Wellington.
……………………….
This is very true, Kepha. Also, my grandfather had children late, so this is quite long ago at this point.
More:
As with teachers, no policeman can give what he hasn’t got to begin with. Too many of us were raised to be “men without chests”
……………………….
This is also true—still, I doubt many American police officers would wink at this, and I hope the British rank and file are not dissimilar.
Still, there is clearly something *very* ugly and evasive going on in British society, and it goes well beyond even the absurd “political correctness” and denial you so often find here.
And before anyone jumps on this, I am *not* anti-British in the least—just concerned over what is gong on. I know many patriotic Britons feel just the same.
voegelinian says
There’s nothing baffling here; the higher-ups were just protecting “diversity” which according to the PC MC worldview (dominant and mainstream throughout the West, affecting the hearts and minds of millions, including ordinary people as well as “Elites”) is a higher priority than anything, including murder. Remember what the Chief of Staff of the U.S. MIlitary (General Casey) said after the Fort Hood massacre: “As horrible as this was, it would be worse if we sacrificed diversity.”
This is the single most important reason why the entire West continues to cultivate myopia about the problem of Islam: a phobia of “racism” (not actual racism, but an Orwellian racism laced and saturated with irrationally excessive White Guilt). Once we realize this, we will cease to be baffled.
abad says
Like I just got through saying on another post – why are Muslim men so ugly? I mean, look at the mug shots of the rapists. No wonder they resort to raping little white British girls – I think these monsters know that no women will ever be attracted to them – yes, even their OWN Muslim women.
Know what? The UK is a lost cause right now, I’ve been on a UK boycott now for close to a year. I am very busy with my full time job and I have plenty of other interests to keep me busy…sorry UK try me again five years from now. If you still exist, that is.
PRODOS says
abad writes: “Know what? The UK is a lost cause right now …”
I disagree with this and have no intention of EVER giving up on the Brits.
The British need our help and it’s WRONG to turn our backs on them no matter how bad things look.
Best Wishes,
PRODOS
Melbourne, Australia
Linda Rivera says
PRODOS, Your comment means so much to me. Thank you, thank you, thank you. So good to know that other people care. I’m English. As of yet, I have not been able to return to England. Homes and rent now cost a huge amount of money because of massive numbers of Muslim immigrants taking the homes. Muslims get free homes and benefits for the rest of their lives without ever having to work.
Many times people say horrible things about the British because of the satanic Muslim Rape War. Every day for years, my heart is breaking. Every day I have great anger and great grief over the satanic sex slaver Muslim monsters gang raping, horribly satanically torturing and forcing into prostitution and sex slavery Britain’s indigenous little girls. And great anger and great grief over British authorities who have ALLOWED this evil for decades. They are complicit. They APPROVE it. British authorities are monsters along with the evil Muslims.
I made a comment on the Gatestone Institute article on this but I see they have still not posted my comment. Maybe they never will.
God bless you, PRODOS.
gravenimage says
I stand with patriotic Britons like you as well, Linda.
katnis says
I haven’t been to this site in a few weeks and returned to see this story. It’s so upsetting and disgusting. It goes on and on. Why can’t they be stopped?
RICHTHOFEN says
This outrage continues unabated up and down the UK. Muslim grooming, rape and murder gangs roam our streets with impunity. The media never mention muslims, doing their best to convince us that the victims are the culprits, not the perpetrators
. The police are in fear of even questioning muslims, under orders from government.
Meanwhile, immigrants continue to stream into UK with no restriction, swamping us with freeloaders, rapists, murderers, the detritus that the EUSSR does not want. Britain is the dustbin, the trash can, for Europe and muslim countries.
Phoney inquiries are called for, etc., but, in reality, nothing changes – our so-called ‘government’ stick blindly to their orders from marxist EUSSR, dancing like puppets to Fuehrerin-Komrade Merkel’s orders. We are being sleepwalked to oblivion by marxist, pc-mesmerised Quislings, appeasers, capitulators, effete perverts able only to introduce reviled so-called queer ‘marriage’ and child adoption abuse measures on the orders of Merkel – genocide of the British race and nation, by any other name.
eric says
Is there concrete evidence these cretins are using Jihad or Koranic passages to justify sexual abuse of the girls? Or, are these just thugs with a passion to rape young girls? I am sure there are both groups represented among the gangs in question. I may be wrong but I don’t think the Koran gives license to pass an unbeliever girl for other men to rape. It is ok to capture the slave and use her sexually for oneself. These crimes seem to be more like you may find in the world but not justified by the words of Allah or Mohammed.
What is most disturbing to me is that law enforcement officers, social workers and politicians are reported to shy away from investigating potential crimes because of the perps’ religion and or race. THAT seems to me to be criminal complicity and absolutely deserving of prosecution. If one can “indict a ham sandwich” here in the USA, surely the Brits can, with a semi parallel justice system, call the public sevants to court to face charges. And as for the perps themselves, any who are not British citizens should be imprisoned and then deported. Any British citizens should be imprisoned for their natural life.
gravenimage says
eric wrote:
Is there concrete evidence these cretins are using Jihad or Koranic passages to justify sexual abuse of the girls? Or, are these just thugs with a passion to rape young girls? I am sure there are both groups represented among the gangs in question.
……………………………….
Eric, I believe this is a distinction without much of a difference. Even those Muslims who are not specifically quoting Qur’an passages have been brought up in most cases having utter contempt for Infidel girls, and believing them to be fair game for rape and abuse.
More:
I may be wrong but I don’t think the Koran gives license to pass an unbeliever girl for other men to rape. It is ok to capture the slave and use her sexually for oneself. These crimes seem to be more like you may find in the world but not justified by the words of Allah or Mohammed.
……………………………….
Really? You might ask why it is that all these grooming gangs are Muslim, then.
And your idea that the Qur’an and Hadith forbid gang rape is mistaken. Here is one Hadith:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Muslim 3371)
…
This does not specifically posit gang rape, but it certainly suggests it.
More importantly than even this, though, is that this is clearly *how Muslims interpret this*. We see Muslims gang raping Infidel women and girls in the Islamic State, in northern Nigeria, and in Sudan.
As well, of course, as in Dar-al-Harb—most notably in Scandinavia, but also in France with the “Tournante”—literally, “pass around”, and here, in Britain.
Here are ten stories—including this one—of Muslims gang raping their Western victims.
http://mrconservative.com/2013/03/6673-ten-horrifying-stories-of-muslims-gang-raping-white-woman/
The last mentioned sexual assault—that of journalist Lara Logan in Cairo—took place on camera and involved *dozens* of Muslims. They certainly were not hiding it.
And here’s a Muslim gang rapist affirming that this is perfectly Islamic:
One of those convicted for abusing multiple victims told the court at his trial that sharing girls for sex “was part of Somali culture” and “a religious requirement”….
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/11/uk-muslim-rape-gang-member-says-raping-girls-a-religious-requirement
I believe the stricture only refers to captives taken back to Dar-al-Islam, where they are either distributed by the Caliph or sold as sex slaves. And then, this stricture only holds because if a Muslim man raped a victim other than specifically “what his right hand possessed”, then he would be using *another Muslim’s sex slave*—this would, essentially, be a “property crime”.
No such strictures if a Muslim is raping Infidel girls in Dar-al-Harb.
rana says
ITS ALL RIGHT TO HAVE A SLAVE GIRL FOR PERSONAL ABUSE EVEN IF ITS PERMITTED BY KORAN ?? PRACTISING TAQIYA RETARD ??
eric says
Why is it we start to have productive discourse and some guy just has to toss around the word ‘retard’. Don’t you get weary of spitting out catch phrases and want to think about your answer before giving it thoughtlessly?
gravenimage says
Eric is an Anti-Jihadist, Rana—he is not condoning this Muslim behavior.
Piggl8 says
Agree
Why didnt the police do anything? The answer is plain and simple: they were too scared they’d be accused of racism.
Thats this countries problem, noone will do anything for fear of being called a racist. We cant even sing bar bar black sheep ‘cos somehow thats racist!?
Apparently one of the dads did go to get his daughter away from these people having also called the police, but they arrested the DAD, leaving the girl there to be gang raped again. Didnt want to be accused of racism so did nothing. Not even take the girl away just in case.
The government and the police and the laws are not doing their jobs. And the public cant do anything – when we live in a country where YOU would go to prison for harming (defending yourself against) someone who has broken into YOUR house and THREATENED YOUR FAMILY!!
Steve says
Where are the true land owners of England? Why are the english letting this happen?
DamnMaineYankee says
Oh come on! It’s just a part of Islamic culture! You should be more accepting of other people’s culture. Don’t make make me send y’all to Cultural Sensitivity Training!
steve says
This report is so distressing I couldn’t force myself to read all of it. The girls were abused and enslaved. the police and social workers didn’t do their job and didn’t give a damn. If I were the parents I’d get an automatic weapon and put it to good use doing what the courts and police refused to do, in timely fashion and at economical cost. Even if I died for my efforts it would be worth losing my life to wake the authorities up. They must do their job or …. or die with the rest of the criminals. The police and social workers were complicit in the crimes and deserve similar punishment. I read about “no-go zones.” Is everyone going to lie down and let a bunch of thugs take over the country? What happened to rights and courage? What happened to your image of what a real man does to protect his home, liberty and family? Islam will take over so long as you let it. It will die in its tracks when you kill it.
More Ham Ed says
eric says “It is ok to capture the slave and use her sexually for oneself.”
The unholy quran.
Thanks for proving the point of 95% of those here on JW.
Who’s going to define “capture” or “slave” – YOU?
YOU need to be shipped directly to the surface of the MOON w/o life support.
gravenimage says
I don’t believe eric is condoning this evil.
eric says
My point is that if these thugs were using the girls in accordance to the Koran, they could not be gang raping them. The motivation seems to me to be more just primitive thug, salacious lust for young non-muslim girls. I appreciate the line of support. Sometimes on these discussions, there is only an occasional sane discussion while most comments are ugly and – well – ignorant.
gravenimage says
Eric, while I understand that you were not condoning this evil, I believe you are quite mistaken in your belief that Islam prevents gang rape.
Nothing, in fact, could be further from the truth.
The fact is that pious Muslims engage in gang rape on a regular basis, and very much on the model of the vile “Prophet”.
eric says
More Ham Ed,
I was explaining that the Koran sets the rules for taking slaves, having sex with them, etc. If you bothered to read what I wrote you would probably have avoided making an ass out of yourself. Too late now.
St. Patrick says
They all look like extras on Walking Dead..and they should be dead..
Rebecca says
First, it was the blatant paedophilic activities of Jimmy Saville that were given police protection, and stories that he was a friend of Margaret Thatcher AND the royal family.
Next there was a story about MP’s who were trying to legalise sex with children. And when a journalist of a local rag tried to report the story he was threatened by Cyril Smith THEN arrested.
Furthermore, we’ve heard that a member of Margaret Thatchers cabinet has been accused of rape and murdering at least 2 children. And that this disgusting child abuse has been rampant amongst members of parliament. Sex parties at Dolphin square were common knowledge.
And, there’s the accusations made against Prince Andrew and the unbelievable way the British media has largely ignored the story.
In relation to the Muslim rape gangs we need to consider the following…..Over 90% of homeless children in Pakistan are victims of rape. There’s no punishment it is “normal” behaviour, to the point of men speaking openly, without shame about it. Then, we have been fed the lie about Islam being a religion of peace. The prophet Mohammed, the one they regard as good and great…..he married a 6yo, then had sex with her at 9yo. I find it hard to believe that those in power were not aware of these facts before mass immigration took place.
Plus, I find it very hard to imagine that all the police forces and all the social services throughout the UK were afraid of being called racist. It seems more plausible that the police and child services had orders from those high up to ignore these reports of abuse.
I believe there is far more to this than we will ever know, I suspect that the Muslim rape gangs could of been predicted and that they probably were.