• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK police told not to investigate Muslim rape gangs

Mar 15, 2015 8:13 pm By Robert Spencer

Muslimrapegang1,400 British non-Muslim children were gang-raped and brutalized by Muslims in one city alone, and “several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”

And here we see police bosses telling officers not to pursue investigations of these rape gangs. The Muslim rape gangs went unreported, unprosecuted, and in general unstopped because of far-Left organizations like Hope Not Hate, Faith Matters, and Tell Mama, which waged relentless war against anyone and everyone who spoke out about these issue. They demonized as “Islamophobic,” “hateful” and “bigoted” anyone who said that there were Muslim rape gangs at all, and that they had to be stopped. They led the campaign to ban Pamela Geller and me from entering the country, when one of the events we had discussed going to was a rally against the rape gangs.Search for “grooming” (these gangs are usually called “grooming gangs” in the British media) at Hope Not Hate’s site, and you will see that the vast majority of the articles mentioning this practice are attacking those who are calling attention to it and protesting against it.

Who is responsible for the religion-based mass gang-rape of British girls? The British Left — in particular the “anti-hate” crusaders Nick Lowles of Hope Not Hate, Fiyaz Mughal of Faith Matters and Tell Mama, and their friends, supporters, and allies.

The lives of countless thousands of girls in Britain are ruined today because of these men. If Britain were even close to being a sane society today, these people would be being subjected to scorching criticism, and there would be a thorough public reevaluation of how much the Left’s alliance with Islamic supremacism and smear campaign against foes of jihad terror has harmed the nation and its people. But Britain is not a sane society today, and these sinister individuals — Lowles, Mughal, and the rest of them — will continue to wield their considerable power and influence in British society.

“Sheffield officers investigating child grooming ‘told to wind necks in’ by bosses,” by Chris Burn, The Star, March 14, 2015 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

Police officers investigating child sexual exploitation in Sheffield were told to ‘wind your necks in’ by bosses after warning about the scale of the problem, a retired detective has claimed.

A BBC investigation has alleged that senior officers thought car crime, burglary and robbery were bigger priorities than child sexual exploitation, despite detectives in the city warning it was a major problem.

Retired detective Tony Brookes, who spent 30 years with the force, worked on inquiries in 2007 which led to six abusers being convicted, and he wanted to build on the case as he recognised the size of the problem.

He said the issue of child sexual exploitation in Sheffield was ‘massive’ and bigger than in neighbouring Rotherham, where at least 1,400 children were abused over a 16-year-period.

Mr Brookes said his team was told by a senior officer to ‘wind your necks in’.

He said: “I don’t think the force wanted to pay. The priorities are robbery, burglary and car crime.

“They are the ones the Government said we want you to tackle, and the resources were spent on that.”

The allegations from Mr Brookes have prompted Police and Crime Commissioner Alan Billings to call for a wide-ranging inspection of the force….

The force isn’t the problem. The culture is the problem — the culture that stigmatizes as “racism” and “bigotry” even the slightest opposition to jihad terror and Islamic supremacism.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, United Kingdom, Useful idiots, willful ignorance Tagged With: Sheffield


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Jay Boo says

    Mar 15, 2015 at 8:27 pm

    What we in the West call interfaith dialog produces this.

    In Islam majority countries interfaith dialog meant submission to Islam.
    Let us send all of the indignant interfaith crowd on a fact finding trip for a true up close and personal interfaith awareness seminar where they can learn first hand what it all really means from a true Muslim perspective.

    • Michael Copeland says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 6:13 pm

      Islam’s sex slaves: a muslim man’s legal right.
      http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/news-libertygb/5919-islam-s-sex-slaves-in-britain

      • Michael Copeland says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 6:34 pm

        There is a sinister training programme, called “Common Purpose”, by which many Local Government and police personnel have been conditioned, to “lead beyond authority”. Hear Pat Condell on it:
        The real enemy within – YouTube
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwAhrU_wTdA

  2. Saleem Smith says

    Mar 15, 2015 at 8:29 pm

    UK officials may not want to acknowledge it, but Islamic theology does indeed permit slavery, sex slavery, and pedophilia. We ex-Muslims loathe the words and legacy of Muhammad.

    THE QURANIC SANCTION OF SLAVERY

    The institution of slavery in Islam was formalized in the following Quranic verse, in which Allah distinguishes free human beings or masters, who exercise justice and righteousness, from the dumb, useless and burdensome ones, the slaves:

    Quran 16:76 Allah sets forth (another) Parable of two men: one of them dumb, with no power of any sort; a wearisome burden is he to his master; whichever way he directs him, he brings no good: is such a man equal with one who commands Justice, and is on a Straight Way?

    Allah warns the believers against taking the slaves as equal partner in status and in sharing their wealth, lest they have to fear them as anyone else:

    Quran 30:28…do ye have partners among those whom your right hands possess (i.e., slaves, captives) to share as equals in the wealth We have bestowed on you? Do ye fear them as ye fear each other?

    Allah recognizes some human beings, namely the masters, as more blessed by Himself than the less favored slaves as part of His divine plan. He warns Muslims against sharing His gifts to them equally with their slaves. Those who would take slaves as equal, warns Allah, would deny Him:

    Quran 16:71 Allah has bestowed His gifts of sustenance more freely on some of you than on others: those more favoured are not going to throw back their gifts to those whom their right hands possess, so as to be equal in that respect. Will they then deny the favours of Allah?

    Allah does not only sanction the institution of slavery, He also gave divine blessing to masters (Muslim men only can own slaves) to have sex with the female slaves:

    Quran 70:29–30 And those who guard their private parts, Except in the case of their wives or those whom their right hands possess—for these surely are not to be blamed

    Quran 23:5–6 And who guard their private parts, except before their mates or those whom their right hands possess, for they surely are not blameable

    Therefore, if there are women amongst the captives or slaves, Muslims are divinely sanctioned to have sex with them as they do with their wives. This verdict of Allah founded the institution of sex-slavery or slave-concubinage in Islam, which was widespread in the pre-colonial Muslim world and continued well into the mid-twentieth century. As far as legal marriage is concerned, there is a limitation of four wives for a man at one time [Quran 4:3], but no such limitation on the number of sex-slaves.

    Allah also gave a divine sanction to Muslims for acquiring female slaves for sexual engagement by waging wars against the infidels:

    Quran 33:50 O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war…

    Muslims can engage in sex with the captured slave women even if they are married, but not with the married free Muslim women:

    Quran 4:24 Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess…

    There are other verses in the Quran that talks approvingly of slaves and capturing them in wars. Thus, according to the divine commands of the Islamic God as enshrined in the holy Quran, Muslims are allowed to keep slaves. They can amass slaves by waging wars, have sex with the female slaves, and of course, use them as they wish. For Muslims, having sex with female slaves is as legal as having sex with their married wives. Slavery appears to be one of the most desired divine privileges in Islam, since Allah took the pain of reminding Muslims about this divine right time and again in so many verses.

    Qur’an, 33:21
    There is a good example in God’s apostle for those of you who look to God and the Last Day and remember God always.

    Hadith, Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 7, Book 62, No. 88:
    Narrated Ursa:
    The prophet wrote the [marriage contract] with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e.’ til his death).

    • Linda Rivera says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 11:05 am

      The Quran is the complete opposite of the Bible. The Muslim Blood Cult god is the complete opposite of the HOLY ONE, our Awesome, Precious Almighty God, our Magnificent Glorious Creator. Thousands of years before Mohammed’s Islam started, God gave His Ten Commandments and other Laws to His faithful Hebrew Jewish servant, Moses. Islam calls for the massive breaking of God’s Holy, Eternal Laws. God’s Holy Laws given to Jewish Moses are intensely HATED by Islam’s god and Muslims.

      The THIEF HAS COME TO STEAL, TO KILL AND TO DESTROY.

      The sacred marriage vows given before Almighty God by non-Muslims are regarded with utter contempt by Muslims. Islam is all about violence, viciously hurting non-Muslims to the maximum, destroying non-Muslim lives and destroying non-Muslim marriages.

      By breaking God’s Holy Laws, by perpetrating satanic atrocities, beheadings, forced conversions, kidnappings, rapes, gang rapes, tortures and barbaric mass murders and huge genocides of non-Muslims and capturing non-Muslim females for sex slaves, Muslims believe their god will reward them with the best food and 72 virgins for eternal sex in Islamic heaven.

      The Holy One and His Holy Laws are rejected and hated by Muslims.

      Jesus said in the Bible, What shall it profit a man if he shall gain the whole world and lose his own soul.

    • gravenimage says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 4:57 pm

      Very true, Saleem. This “grooming” of underaged British girls is based *exactly* on the sanction for Muslims taking Infidel sex slaves.

    • Shane says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 5:26 pm

      Yes, the British are gutless cowards who deserve to be enslaved by Muslim fanatics. The Left has allied with Islamic supremacists to take over Britain.

    • Rob Porter says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 7:18 pm

      Saleem, what I find incomprehensible is the cowardice in confronting criminal Muslims and the appalling lack of concern for the lives of those girls. How do men not get angry when they discover that their girls have been so appalling used and abused by human filth who add nothing of value to any society?

  3. Burt says

    Mar 15, 2015 at 8:31 pm

    “…others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”

    These managers must be named, shamed, sacked and eventually sued by victims!

    Britain is insane Mr Spencer, it’s insanity is spreading and affecting the west including USA too. Keep fighting insanity with your truth I hope it reaches more and more minds before it’s too late.

    • Peggy says

      Mar 15, 2015 at 9:00 pm

      Actually what the police bosses did was criminal. It’s called conspiracy. Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and aiding the criminal. Sheltering the criminal is also an offense so why haven’t any of these bosses ever been charged with any of this?
      The police minister himself must be charged with obstructing justice because the order must’ve come from the top.
      It is not islamophobia if you want to bring a criminal to justice no matter what religion that criminal is.

      • Charli Main says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 3:15 am

        But—but—-but Peggy the police and these Muslim rapists will tell you that they were just good Muslims practicing their religion.
        Why, everyone has the right to practice their religion don´t they ???’ Its a pillar of Western Democracy—–
        Do you know what will happen if the police try to stop these Muslims following the example of their child rapist ” prophet” ????
        Why, the Muslims will become angry–very, very angry and might stop making all those ” enormous contributions” that they make to Britain.
        We don´t want that do we ???’ What ever would all Britain´s non Muslim communities do, if the Muslims stopped enriching our society with their presence ?????

      • Marty says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 11:20 am

        Unquestionably the police acted illegally in this matter, and appropriate measures must be taken against those guilty.
        It is, rightly, said that these children were not defended down to political correctness, and the most powerful political organisation in the UK, the BBC, still refers to the perpetrators as “asians”, which is an offence to all asians who are not muslims.
        Another factor, rarely mentioned, is that some senior police officers were in cahoots with the muslims, or at least, scared of any trouble on the issue, because, they themselves were pedophiles or of a similar perverted outlook.
        There’s no doubt that Cyril Smith’s bizarre influence in Rochdale let muslim predators off the hook.
        Similar other cases, unsolved or stopped halfway through, could involve senior police,politicians etc and coincidentally shelter muslim criminals.

      • Michael Copeland says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 6:21 pm

        The police are probably not so much “insane” as compromised and corrupt. Remember how a Rotherham rape victim’s clothing, brought in as evidence, was “lost”? It is convenient to blame fear of racism: it distracts attention away from other causes.

    • particolor says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 4:18 am

      Ill bet if they were Irish or English Gangs they would be doing 20 Years Gaol now !! 🙁

  4. Gary says

    Mar 15, 2015 at 8:36 pm

    Despite the lack of “resources” or misplaced “priorities” these Muslim Monsters will have their day in court……..

    ‘Nothing in all creation is hidden from God’s sight. Everything is uncovered and laid bare before the eyes of him to whom we must give account.’

    Hebrews 4:13

    ‘And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.

    And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.’

    Revelation 20:11-12

  5. PGuud says

    Mar 15, 2015 at 8:55 pm

    In a sane world, that “one city” would have been cleansed long ago of its Muslim vermin. In a sane world, fathers and sons themselves would have taken up arms long ago and rid their homeland of the Muslim infestation. In a sane world, a corrupt and perfidious government would have been toppled long ago by its citizens.

    In a sane world, Islam would be nonexistent.

    Islam: where freedom ends and slavery begins.

    • TheBuffster says

      Mar 15, 2015 at 10:31 pm

      PGuud – “In a sane world, that “one city” would have been cleansed long ago of its Muslim vermin. In a sane world, fathers and sons themselves would have taken up arms long ago and rid their homeland of the Muslim infestation. In a sane world, a corrupt and perfidious government would have been toppled long ago by its citizens.”

      Whoa-whoa-whoa! I understand the outraged emotion behind this statement, but ethnic cleansing of all Muslims isn’t a just and moral solution to the problem. I would just add another layer of evil in answer to evil.

      The problem in Britain and elsewhere in the free world is a failure to uphold reason and individual rights from the ground up, without compromise. The problem is the creeping political correctness of “multiculturalism” that has damned everything western while claiming that no culture is less moral in its practices than any other, and that to impose our ways on other cultures – including those who have moved into free countries, is to be “imperialist” and “racist” and “bigoted” and “hateful”.

      It’s an irrational political philosophy that has turned social policies inside out, and that’s what has to be fought by people speaking out loud and clear and *rationally*, demanding that all people be expected to abide by the laws that defend the individual right to one’s life, liberty, and property. No one is exempt from this, regardless of religion, race, gender, etc. – all have the same right to be free from the initiation of force and all are required to refrain from the initiation of force.

      No special favors. No exemptions for irrational, rights-violating religious customs. No submitting to fears of being called “racist” for simply following evidence where it leads. No assumptions that if a particular group has more people in prison for a particular kind of crime (or more people in prison, period) that that *must* mean that the police are picking on that group – as if no group can actually have a higher percentage of a given crime or crime in general than any other.

      The idea that groups can’t just naturally give rise to more, say, musicians or math prodigies or football players or psychotics or killers is absurd. Life doesn’t hand out all varieties of traits and interests in equal proportions to all human groups. Assuming disparities in proportions is a result of bigotry in society at large is itself injustice to those assumed to be the bigots.

      What we need is respect for objectivity, sheared of moral fads aimed at demonizing objective minds.

      Freedom lovers have to take back their freedom in the public arena – and you do that loudly and insistently, with sound, principled, rational argument and by creating a culture – in movies, TV, radio, novels, songs, etc. – that brings a love for liberty and objectivity back to people’s minds. Those of us who understand the importance of these principles have to insist upon them, unrelentingly.

      If we stand our ground morally and publicly and never give up, we can win this. But we have to keep the high ground and not let emotion trump the principles that we should be upholding with all our intelligence and courage. Saying that “In a sane world, fathers and sons themselves would have taken up arms long ago and rid their homeland of the Muslim infestation” is to say “lets go in for mob rule, take up arms and drive out or wipe out every person calling themselves “Muslim”, regardless of what they believe as individuals and what they actually *do* as individuals.

      That actually would be bigotry and injustice. It’s just as bigoted and unjust as considering a man’s religion or race before deciding whether to prosecute his crimes.

      If we want to bring sanity back to the world, we have to bring back a respect for – if not a love for – objectivity and individual rights. There hasn’t been enough people taking the gradual loss of those values seriously and fighting intelligently to bring them back to our culture.

      If we fight effectively in the cultural and political realm for those principles, the supremacist Muslims won’t be welcome in our countries, they won’t be able to get anywhere with the law, won’t be able to get Shariah concessions, won’t be able to get away with rape or honor killing or any of the other rot that counters anyone’s rights, and they will stop coming or leave.

      The West has blindly opened its doors to the barbarians and accommodated their anti-individualist, anti-liberty customs and beliefs. It has crippled itself so that it can’t stand up to those who challenge our foundational principles, because it has traded those principles for multicultural frippery. A free country can accept all kinds of cultural differences and a huge variety of beliefs, but it cannot allow actions that violate the very principles the laws of a free society should protect. People who aim to shoot those principles down should not be treated as friends. Because they aren’t.

      • Western Canadian says

        Mar 15, 2015 at 10:51 pm

        “but ethnic cleansing of all Muslims isn’t a just and moral solution to the problem.”

        There is a considerable difference between ‘ethnic cleansing’ and repelling and expelling invaders…..

        And yes, the incarceration of Japanese ethnics who were loyal Canadians and Americans during
        the second world war or of eastern Europeans during the first, were both crimes against humanity… The difference being, loyal citizens vs hostile invaders….

        • TheBuffster says

          Mar 15, 2015 at 11:58 pm

          Western Canadian, I took PGuud’s statement: “In a sane world, that “one city” would have been cleansed long ago of its Muslim vermin. In a sane world, fathers and sons themselves would have taken up arms long ago and rid their homeland of the Muslim infestation.” to mean something more sinister than repelling and expelling invaders. That sounds to me like a call to mob violence, making no distinction between the supremacist Muslims and those who are not keen themselves to live under Shariah and are glad to be away from those who practice full-fledged Islam.

          Fathers and sons taking up arms “to rid their homeland of the Muslim infestation” is unlikely to distinguish between the guilty and the innocent.

          My way of fighting this fight will actually preserve our rights – and do so in a deeper way, getting people to protect ourselves against ALL types of incursions against our liberties, not just the Islamist threat.

          But it may be the threat of Islamic Supremicism that makes enough people ripe for that project that weren’t ready before. What we don’t want is people striking out blindly against any ol’ Muslim, going all mob-mentality. We can do better than that.

          Morally, we have to.

      • PRODOS says

        Mar 15, 2015 at 11:08 pm

        I agree 100% with TheBuffster.

        However, I do understand where PGuud is coming from (as I’m sure TheBuffster does too).

        PGuud writes: “In a sane world, Islam would be nonexistent … Islam: where freedom ends and slavery begins.”

        Yes. Slavery and oppression is within the DNA of Islam. It’s almost the definition of Islam.

        Isn’t it true, however, that the Islam Problem is, in many ways, an effect, a consequence, of other causes?

        Islam is not the only anti-freedom ideology on earth. Whether it’s even the worst such ideology is arguable.

        Directing our fighting spirit to making our governments liberate and PROTECT free speech would be helpful. And if existing politicians don’t want to do that, nothing stops us from becoming politicians ourselves.

        TheBuffster writes: “If we want to bring sanity back to the world, we have to bring back a respect for – if not a love for – objectivity and individual rights.”

        Right. Try and find such a love and respect at today’s Universities.

        It’s not Islam that made those institutions such intellectual and cultural sewers.

        But tyrants of a feather flock together.

        • TheBuffster says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 12:11 am

          PRODOS said: “Right. Try and find such a love and respect at today’s Universities.

          “It’s not Islam that made those institutions such intellectual and cultural sewers.

          “But tyrants of a feather flock together.”

          I agree 100%.

          Which is partly what I meant by: “The West has blindly opened its doors to the barbarians and accommodated their anti-individualist, anti-liberty customs and beliefs.”

          The West has opened the doors, at root, *by undermining the philosophical underpinnings of liberty* at the universities, the high schools, the grade schools, and hence in the cultural manifestations of the philosophy that people learn in their schools. People create their works of art and entertainment from their philosophical premises, and they get their premises from the culture around them, including what is taught to them in school (unless they are extraordinarily independent of mind). The art and entertainment reinforces and spreads those premises far and wide.

          You can’t fix that by any other means than spreading better premises. Fundamentally, you have to convince people of better premises. Any shortcut to that will lead you where you don’t want to go.

        • roger woodhouse says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 5:53 am

          Yes . While ‘the left ‘ control the narrative here via the MSM/ BBC etc nothing can change; Only by electing people who have a like mind to effect real change can we begin to reverse the downward drift and dead end of multi culturalism, The Buffster makes excellent points that would if implemented improve our situation but we lack the ‘leadership’.The British people are supine and ignorant but could ,with the right type of leader be made aware of just what is at stake within their homeland . I fear though that it is going to need another few hundred more killed on our streets before that can happen . Remember, the British do not do ‘pro active’. Churchill was hated by the establishment ‘in the 30s for speaking out against the threat from Germany. How many Brits died as a result of Britis government procrastination?

      • Horace Yo says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 12:17 am

        Well thought out and reasonable, Buffster, but naive and overly optimistic, failing to understand the enemy and to correctly assess the current status of things. All your reasonable solutions were tried early on, but failed due to the rapidity of the massive influx of Muslims and their use of al taquiyya-lies about the peaceful nature of Islam. If you look around you will find that all the Muslims are supporters of Sharia law(if not willingly then under duress). They were lying when they told you Islam was very tolerant and peaceful. It has already reached a critical point of no return in the UK where none of your reasonable solutions can even be implemented any more. OK, if they could be implemented they would certainly help. It is unfortunately too late for non violent solutions as the Muslims now control the battlefield, and through threats and bribery control most of the media and the corrupt and cowardly politicians and bureaucracy, and are aggressively consolidating their gains and have absolutely no intention of your solutions being permitted. What is left is either surrender to the jihadis or take the gloves off, become very aggressive, and politically and verbally try to fight back and roll it back to where your solutions could be implemented. Since that’s not going to happen , get ready to be killed and your wife and children to be taken as slaves. Otherwise you are going to have to flee or to arm yourself, train and be ready to shoot the jihadis and their collaborators when they come for you and your family and neighbors.

        • TheBuffster says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 3:52 am

          Hi, Horace.

          I don’t doubt that in those places where Muslims have gained the political upper hand beyond reversal, it *will* come down to violence eventually.

          The UK – from all that I’ve read – has certainly gone appallingly far down the road and I don’t doubt that violent confrontation is coming. But if it has to happen, I hope by that time a large portion of the population will also be armed with a firm understanding of the principles of liberty, what they are fighting for, and that they’ll be *aiming at those who are aiming at them*, not going after Muslims indiscriminately.

          If the cultural/intellectual/moral tide isn’t turned from PC bulls**t to the principles of individual liberty and a solid understanding and appreciation of those values, I’m afraid any violence that might occur won’t lead to anything but death and destruction for everybody.

          If not enough people understand what the fight is about, you’ll just end up with a bloody mess.

        • TheBuffster says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 3:53 am

          Or you might wind up with an authoritarian dictatorship not of your choosing.

        • Cicero says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 2:06 pm

          Horace I agree with all that you have said. They are safely entrenched within all aspects of British society . They therefore hold pole position and nothing can take place in any of Britain’s affairs without our leaders consulting the followers of the Religionof peace.

    • cs says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 2:20 pm

      In a sane world the whole Britain (Muzzies included), would raise against this attitude of complacency and acceptance of this take over. The take over is about Muslim attitudes and sharia wanting to overlay the whole society. In other times just to mention would raise the concern of everyone in the whole world. So there is obviously a major infiltration in the intellectual apparatus of the western civilization who is pushing on this evil agenda.
      What for is anyone’s guess, surely it is not in the interest of the sane majority, it is really a shame and I believe it will backfire in a few years, you cannot carry on lying forever.

      • cs says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 2:23 pm

        Just to compliment, in a sane world, British muslim community should awe those things and distance itself from it, but guess what? They don’t, they never do much effort to distance themselves from all the rubbish they promote, quite the opposite, and they justify it in the most obnoxious manner and they want us to buy their crap, and guess what? Some parties are eagerly consuming this rubbish. So why they would change their strategy??

  6. vlparker says

    Mar 15, 2015 at 9:34 pm

    1,400 British non-Muslim children were gang-raped and brutalized by Muslims in one city alone, and “several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”

    This is just beyond comprehension.

    • Mo says

      Mar 15, 2015 at 10:35 pm

      @ vlparker

      “This is just beyond comprehension.”

      I was just going to say the exact same thing.

      Have people gone totally mad?

      • Michael Warden says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 6:31 am

        Where were the fathers, brother and uncles of these girls ? Why were not a good few muslims found and “spoken to ” to explain their actions were not civilized ? Why were not the A&E departments in hospitals full of muslims with broken bones and suffering from minor surgical procedures ?

        • Mo says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 9:09 am

          @ Michael Warden

          “Where were the fathers, brother and uncles of these girls ? Why were not a good few muslims found and “spoken to ” to explain their actions were not civilized ? Why were not the A&E departments in hospitals full of muslims with broken bones and suffering from minor surgical procedures ?”

          Beating up random Muslisms is not the answer, nor is it anything I support. So don’t you dare pretend like we have some common ground here. I didn’t say that, nor will I ever say it.

          Take your trash elsewhere.

        • Rob Crawford says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 12:10 pm

          In modern Britain, if someone breaks into your home in the middle of the night, threatens to rape and murder you, and then suffers ANY physical harm, YOU are the one facing charges and prison time. They’ve made self-defense an obscene concept, and enforced that idea.

          Committing violence in the defense of another would be treated WORSE.

          The Bits need to expel the leftists, first, and reclaim their culture. Then they can deal with the colonists.

        • TheBuffster says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 11:42 pm

          Yes, the underlying problem is a philosophical one. When the guiding philosophy of those in charge is wrong, you get branches and branches of wrongness throughout the whole system. One thing after another will go wrong. And the fixes that people come up with will be wrong and lead to more trouble, and on and on.

          The society can only fix itself by going back to the fundamental principles of liberty, of individual rights. Not an easy task to get politicians and bureaucrats to think in principled terms, I know. But maybe as the problems grow more obvious and impinging more people will be ready to listen at last.

          I hope so.

        • Darren says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 1:33 pm

          We will be headed down the same path in the future Rob, of course due to the U.S being such a big place there will be enslaves of sanity, but as the immigrant numbers grow, so will our loss of freedom and our descent into the leftist utopia they all envision. Granted most of our immigrants are Hispanic, but look no further than the basket case that is most of South America, that is where we are headed, at this point due to demographics and unchecked immigration is this most likely a certainty at this point.

          They are conservative on family issues, but on pretty much every other issue they are liberal, maybe not the middle class wealthy Hispanics so much, but most of the immigrants we are taking in are dependent upon government or poor and uneducated. The powers that be want to replace or dilute the native populace of America so we are easier to control, and so they can gain more power ruling over us like Feudal lords and ladies,just like in Europe, Europe get’s screwed even further due to the elite picking the worst of all immigrants muslims, who want to colonize the infidel lands.

        • gravenimage says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 6:08 pm

          Michael Warden wrote:

          Where were the fathers, brother and uncles of these girls ?
          ……………………….

          Michael, in most cases these Mohammedan rapists deliberately targeted what in the States are called “at risk” youth—kids from broken homes and negligent homes, runaways, kids in foster homes and group homes—in other words, kids who were less likely to have *any* adult looking out for them.

          Muslims always victimize the most vulnerable.

    • TheBuffster says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 12:59 am

      And yet, I think I do comprehend it.

      It’s where a society goes when a significant portion of its leadership has been steeped in a false set of premises for so long that they have lost their grip on their reasoning faculties, when emotionalistic views have taken over from objective, reasoned ones, and when those who still have respect for reason are shouted down and “shamed” by emotionalistic twits among the intelligentsia who believe that objectivity is impossible and that emotionalistic arguments and shaming is a legitimate mode of getting one’s way.

      And then you have the cowards who have decided to go along to get along, cutting off their own ability to look ahead at what will happen if somebody doesn’t stand up for reason and rights and objectivity, even if they get smeared for it.

      It all works to the advantage of the short-range, vague-minded, emotionalistic fools. And it’s only the long-range, clear-minded, objective thinkers who can have the conviction, founded on facts and sound reasoning, that will give them the courage to stand up to smears and whatever other ugly stuff that will come their way.

      Bad things come from soft and fuzzy minds, even if the soft and fuzzy minds have “good” intentions.

      Take enough twists and turns with a soft and fuzzy mind, and you wind up letting gang rapists get away with it because they’re part of an “oppressed” minority, and being accused of “racism” could ruin your career, and you don’t have the convictions and the guts to risk that for the more valuable prize of your own moral self respect.

      • Mirren10 says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 8:27 am

        ”Take enough twists and turns with a soft and fuzzy mind, and you wind up letting gang rapists get away with it because they’re part of an “oppressed” minority, and being accused of “racism” could ruin your career, and you don’t have the convictions and the guts to risk that for the more valuable prize of your own moral self respect”

        Very true, Buffster.

        And I agree with you; when it finally does come down to bloody civil war, we must remember **what we are fighting for**, as we did in the Second World War.

        
        ”All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing ” Edmund Burke.

        • Demsci says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 2:09 pm

          Having Read the excellent analysis of the Buffster, and then your remark
          //”when it finally does come down to bloody civil war, we must remember **what we are fighting for**, as we did in the Second World War.”//

          Something stirred in me. Great. Yes! But in WWII the British were with their backs against the wall and the Americans were provoked by Pearl Harbor, before they finally, IN MAJORITY, decided on “righteous’ war.

          To me “Wisdom of the Masses” still counts for much. And a nation get’s the leaders it votes for and deserves and so the majority eventually get’s the fate it deserves” in my view. And I think we should focus on that ignorant, stubborn majority, which on the other hand may still have it right.

          Either somehow the peace is kept, and Islam’s window of opportunity to conquer the world closes in the near future or

          much more violence, civil war will come, but THEN, when, yes, we lose lives and territory, finally in SOME countries/ cities

          a majority of the remaining people and territories will know what it is FOR, then these will be protagonists, not neutrals anymore, and that will make the difference, and fight back. And very effectively I suggest, what with great technology and refugees fleeing toward the last strongholds of Democracy.

          In the second scenario I am inclined to leave stubborn naive, ignorant, political correct neutral majorities and their politicians and media to their own devices, along with their territory, while ALL of you seem to want to save that “stubborn neutral majority” at all cost, if need be against their own will. But THAT is not democratic.

          If they don’t want to join one pack of wolves (us) I say let them (and their children!) be pray for the opposing pack (Muslims). In a time of war it can be very lethal to want to be independent and alone (Lee Harris wrote this in “Suicide of Reason”) as these neutrals always seem to want to be.

          I am so tired of us trying to convince all those “neutrals”.

      • voegelinian says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 2:50 pm

        This is mostly true, but rather vague. The mindset described here also (and likely more importantly) has a sociocultural dimension, in terms of paradigm shift and worldview — which in turn has historical depth.Without a fuller appreciation of these broader and deeper dimensions, the analysis resembles more a complaint about some amorphous gas in the air.

        • voegelinian says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 2:52 pm

          — or (as we see with ominous intimations in other commenters above (e.g., “Prodos”), some major whiffs of a nefarious conspiracy theory.

        • PRODOS says

          Mar 17, 2015 at 7:04 am

          voegelinian writes: “or (as we see with ominous intimations in other commenters above (e.g., “Prodos”), some major whiffs of a nefarious conspiracy theory.”

          I tend not to believe in or follow “conspiracy theories” of any sort.

          So tell us all where, in any of my comments, YOU have sniffed between the lines of what I’ve actually said and uncovered these dark, hidden nefarious “whiffs”?

          Expose me! Before the Lizard People do it for you!

  7. Richie says

    Mar 15, 2015 at 9:50 pm

    Cowards!!!

  8. Richie says

    Mar 15, 2015 at 9:51 pm

    I think if Muslims decided to have a raping spree in the US, lets say in Texas, they would be eating lead

    • pumbar says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 12:13 am

      You don’t believe it’s happening there? Because it is.

    • voegelinian says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 2:53 pm

      Nah; Texas has been PC-ified for decades now. There’s not a place on God’s green Earth that hasn’t been transformed by PC MC.

  9. RonaldB says

    Mar 15, 2015 at 10:06 pm

    I personally think the “fix” was more than indirect. In other words, I don’t think it was only a “fear” of being called racist, but a concrete connection between politicians either beholden to Muslims or Muslims themselves, and the police officials who ordered the cover-up.

    Le’s be clear on what we’re doing. We’re importing millions of aggressive Muslims, who are driven by narrow imams, who except for the Koran and Islam, are the most ignorant, uneducated people on earth. It is unlikely most imams would be able to land a job as janitor, if it weren’t for their religious status. So, they had damn well better show their influence, if they want to keep their house and car.

    Against this hungry hoard of aggressive believers, we have an unmotivated corps of overpaid, civil-service time-servers, who long ago lost the ability to actually do anything useful and whose main fear is not being able to retire with as large a pension as they had planned. So, naturally, they are not going to do anything to oppose someone who can actually cause them some grief. I should note that if anyone had stood up in the process and actually asserted his manhood (I’m speaking symbolically, so this includes ladies as well: keep the series “Prime Suspect” in mind), I think they would have had a good (not guaranteed) chance of coming out on top.

    • TheBuffster says

      Mar 15, 2015 at 10:48 pm

      I think you’re probably right, Ronald, about “a concrete connection between politicians either beholden to Muslims or Muslims themselves, and the police officials who ordered the cover-up.”

      What we need are as many politically active citizens as possible speaking reason to power, and to each other, tearing down the mind-bending “multicultural” dogma, exposing it for what it is, and making public officials feel the shame of having given in to that pile of manure where only injustice and perversity can grow.

      We need to make our case clearly, right down to the principled foundations, in a way that even the simplest mind can grasp it. We need to do it relentlessly. And we need to do it so well, so intelligently and fearlessly that those more timid souls in society will gain the courage to join in.

      We need to take the anger that’s building against Islam, Muslims, and public officials, and channel it in a constructive direction, away from emotional, outraged, knee-jerk reactions, and into a reasoned understanding of the principles we need to uphold, and how our societies have gotten so far away from those principles. Then we have to build our solution on those principles, be consistent with the principles that we aim to live by.

      • TheBuffster says

        Mar 15, 2015 at 10:53 pm

        And, of course, we have to rally against any politicians and other officials – the ones giving the orders against justice – and make them accountable for undermining the law and sacrificing the innocent to criminals. If they are beholden to Imams or foreign governments, that should be made crystal clear. And if the news media aren’t giving it to us straight, we need to shame them, too.

        • roger woodhouse says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 6:06 am

          We here in Britain have one last chance to begin to address any of your excellent points by electing the ‘only voice’ the people have at the next Election in May .Only by voting for Nigel Farage and his party UKIP can we start the process. Unfortunately the Establishment (the leftwing media) will pull out all the stops to prevent them for having any real influence .

      • Western Canadian says

        Mar 15, 2015 at 11:06 pm

        Since the rot we are in opposition to has been attacking us from within while we looked the other way for a couple of generations, that will not be a small task.

        • TheBuffster says

          Mar 15, 2015 at 11:38 pm

          Yes, I know, Western Canadian. But that’s what has to be done. It will take courage and steadfastness and lots of work.

          But it has to be done if what we want to build up and preserve is our liberty and a healthy, ethical society.

      • PRODOS says

        Mar 15, 2015 at 11:19 pm

        TheBuffster writes: “What we need are as many politically active citizens as possible speaking reason to power,”

        I like that.

        “Speaking reason to power.”

        🙂

        • TheBuffster says

          Mar 15, 2015 at 11:43 pm

          Thank you, PRODOS. 🙂

        • ECAW says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 4:21 am

          That’s right, we must focus our afforts through politics. In Holland Geert Wilders, in France Marine Le Pen, in Sweden the Swedish democrats.

          In Britain Liberty GB. Whaddya mean you haven’t joined yet?

          https://ecawblog.wordpress.com/liberty-gb/

      • voegelinian says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 3:05 pm

        What we need are as many politically active citizens as possible speaking reason to power, and to each other, tearing down the mind-bending “multicultural” dogma, …

        The problem with these Real-Problemers like Buffster, RonaldB, Prodos, et al., is that they can’t see the broader picture, which is that probably the majority of ordinary people throughout the West have become enculturated in PC MC (not uniformly, of course, but sufficiently so to make them maddeningly moronic about the problem of Islam). And the glib alacrity with which these Real-Problemers leap to a Conspiracy Theory to explain all significant bad things does not help, either. An informed trust in Western Civilization errs on the side of caution in this regard, and when thus informed we contemplate the sociocultural phenomenon of a majority of our fellow citizens throughout the West more or less PC MC about Islam, we do not reach for the Conspiracy Theory — we rather reach for an explanation that does not base itself on Mass Manipulation by Dastardly Elites nor on Mass Stupidity. Such an explanation is plausible, once the observer actually steps outside back into the real world and talks to people (and an appreciation for history doesn’t hurt, either).

        The bottom line, and the epiphany, is that PC MC is a good thing gone bad — not an evil thing. And it’s not merely a matter of Dastardly “Elites”. Nor is it merely a matter of those darned “Leftists”.

        • TheBuffster says

          Mar 17, 2015 at 11:52 pm

          Voegelinian, I don’t think you get where I’m coming from. And I don’t get why you think I believe in a conspiracy theory. I don’t. I believe bad ideas, as they become entrenched in a culture, lead to bad consequences, and the only way to fix the problem is to supplant the bad ideas with good ones.

          Voegelinian: “The problem with these Real-Problemers like Buffster, RonaldB, Prodos, et al., is that they can’t see the broader picture, which is that probably the majority of ordinary people throughout the West have become enculturated in PC MC (not uniformly, of course, but sufficiently so to make them maddeningly moronic about the problem of Islam).”

          Buffster: What makes you think that we can’t see that? I can’t speak for RonaldB, but I know Prodos extremely well (because I’m married to him) and we’re quite aware of the enculturation problem.

          Both Prodos and I talk to a lot of ordinary people about Islam and rights and… well, you have no idea of the projects we’ve got going to get better ideas into the culture. Prodos spends all his time working on these projects, and while I’m not spending 16 hours a day on the job, I do a lot. The posts I make online are nothing compared to our off-line efforts.

          And we’ve found that it’s quite *easy* to open eyes of *most* people if you talk to them respectfully and have patience and present your case with plenty of evidence and sound reasoning, person-to-person. Most people are not moronic, they just don’t have the time or interest to do the research. They know what the culture has presented to them. They just haven’t heard all sides of the issue. When they hear it from someone they *like*, who presents the case intelligently and with humor and good will, most people are receptive – unless they’re college students and die-hard lefties who live in a self-righteous bubble. (Not all college students, of course, and not even all lefties, especially not old-lefties.)

          Voegelinian: “And the glib alacrity with which these Real-Problemers leap to a Conspiracy Theory to explain all significant bad things does not help, either. An informed trust in Western Civilization errs on the side of caution in this regard, and when thus informed we contemplate the sociocultural phenomenon of a majority of our fellow citizens throughout the West more or less PC MC about Islam, we do not reach for the Conspiracy Theory — we rather reach for an explanation that does not base itself on Mass Manipulation by Dastardly Elites nor on Mass Stupidity. ”

          Buffster: I strongly doubt that the people who have pushed these bad ideas and have taken a less than intelligent path to try to gain good ends intended their policies to lead to the ends we’re seeing now. I could see it coming long ago, but that’s because I was operating on a sound set of guiding principles that enabled me to see it. The trouble with the people who have lead our societies in the present direction is that they either have a wrong guiding principle, or they just aren’t very good with principled thought in the first place.

          No conspiracy there.

          But the results of bad principles and policies often *look* like conspiracies because the principles people follow lead in a certain direction, whether those people have the savvy to see where they’re leading or not.

          For example, Obama looks like he’s a Muslim because the kinds of PC policies he follows lead in that direction. Yes, he has a Muslim family background, and yes, his personal sympathies are undoubtedly affected by that, but would other PC non-Muslims make the same choices? I believe a lot of them would. Is Obama a Muslim? I don’t know. And it doesn’t matter. Elect another PC politician and let’s see what choices she makes. (No, please don’t.)

          That’s not to say that small conspiracies don’t exist. Do Saudis not give financial support to universities to get them to bow to Islam this way and that, for example? But when a culture has undermined its respect for its own achievements and has over-emphasized all the worst aspects of its history, when you talk to allegedly educated university students who have no idea what the principles of liberty entail and they spout propaganda against Israel and all the dead white males that wrote the Constitution of the United States without any grasp of the context of the times, that’s not caused by a conspiracy. That’s caused by bad philosophical ideas that have been accepted and implemented by the educational establishment. They’re ideas that make people blind and stupid. They’re bad ideas that trap people in a bubble. And over the decades it’s gotten worse and worse.

          There may be some component of conspiracy in that, but there doesn’t have to be. All it needs for bad ideas to ruin a culture is for those who hold better ideas to fail to pay attention, or to do a poor job of explaining what’s wrong, or to do a half-hearted job, or to be overwhelmed with hopelessness and give up, thinking that people are impossibly thick.

          Prodos and I have found that most ordinary people are not impossibly thick. It seems that the allegedly highly educated – or rather, the highly *schooled* – people tend to be the thick ones.

          Voegelinian: “The bottom line, and the epiphany, is that PC MC is a good thing gone bad — not an evil thing. And it’s not merely a matter of Dastardly “Elites”. Nor is it merely a matter of those darned “Leftists”.”

          Buffster: I have never said that the problem is “merely a matter of Dastardly “Elites”. or those darned “Leftists”.” I don’t know why you assume that I think that, because I profoundly do not.

          But PC and MC – at least how I mean them – are not a good thing gone bad.

          PC – political correctness – is, by it’s nature, an attitude rather than a specific set of ideas. It’s the attitude that there is a certain accepted political view (insert any view here) and that no one coming from any other view has anything valuable to add. People not holding that view aren’t worth listening to, and it’s perfectly alright to shut them up by shaming, shouting them down, calling them “racist” or “bigoted”, and smearing their reputation in hopes that no one will take their dissenting views seriously. The PC attitude is a bubble mentality that interprets everything dissenters say in the worst possible light in order to avoid questioning whatever the PC doctrine is. PC is anti-intellectual and anti-truth, simply because the believer is trapped in his or her own hermetically-sealed box and seems to have no idea that there is any legitimate challenge that good people can pose to the “acceptable” doctrine.

          Actually listening to dissenters and wanting to know what the y*really* think is off the radar for those with a PC attitude. What the opposition “really” thinks is already part of the PC doctrine, so one doesn’t have to do anything but laugh off anyone who doesn’t agree.

          Dissenters can have their own PC attitudes, as well. It’s the PC attitude that can make communications across enemy lines impossible. It’s a bad thing. It’s the very essence of what’s wrong. It’s threatening the freedom of expression. (See “hate speech” tribunals and university policies.) And that threatens the efforts of honest minds to discover truths and to get people to listen to what they find.

          Then there’s “multiculturalism”. Studying and understanding other cultures is a good thing. Accepting people into your society from other cultures is often a good thing… as long as those people, as individuals, come into a free society ready to embrace the free country’s principles of individual rights. Freedom for me *and* for thee. It doesn’t matter what background an immigrant comes from, as long as that immigrant is happy to recognize that he doesn’t get to violate the protections of rights that all others have to abide by. He will not be given any special favors. He will not be allowed to continue in any cultural practices that violate the laws protecting all against force and fraud. He will not be able to change those laws protecting fundamental rights, and he will be treated with scorn if he does try to change them.

          And it is the immigrants responsibility to find out about the host culture and – most importantly – its laws in relation to the immigrant’s beliefs. He will either have to adapt or find a country with an accommodating culture.

          But that’s not what I understand “multiculturalism” to mean, at least not in today’s context. Today it means treating all cultures as if they are all equally valid, even if they include horrific beliefs and practices that violate the rights our constitution protects. It means not trying to educate immigrants from other cultures as to what is and isn’t acceptable in their new country, because that would be insulting and disrespectful of their culture. It means that when they do violate the law, law enforcement goes easy on them because of their culture.

          When I say “multiculturalism” that’s what I’m referring to. However it started out, that’s what it is now, and it got there because of the stupid “PC” attitude that killed rational, principled debate on the issue and allowed the stupid approach to lead the way.

        • voegelinian says

          Mar 18, 2015 at 5:20 pm

          Sure, Buffster; I see now from a closer reading of your comments that you are not promoting that kind of “Real-Problemer” conspiracy theory; though I still find PRODOS lurches that way — as when he writes:

          “And if existing politicians don’t want to do that, nothing stops us from becoming politicians ourselves.”

          A simplistic view where “the politicians” are the bad guys, and the citizens have the awareness and capability of correcting them, if only…

          And his response to you when you wrote “If we want to bring sanity back to the world, we have to bring back a respect for – if not a love for – objectivity and individual rights.”

          when he wrote: “Right. Try and find such a love and respect at today’s Universities.” Again, one detects a black hat/white hat view of the world, where the System (Gubmint and Academe, and Mass Media) are the problem, with no seeming mention or comprehension of ordinary people’s enablement of this problem.

          And: “It’s not Islam that made those institutions such intellectual and cultural sewers.”

          Unless the West is already some kind of crypto-totalitarian regime, with the People hoodwinked by “the Media”, then the problem of our mainstream institutions being PC MC is not some kind of directed phenomenon, but more of an organic development, where causes and symptoms merge in a more complex sociocultural context; where the good and the deleterious become intertwined; and where the Elites and the Ordinary People are no longer meaningfully (i.e., pragmatically) distinguishable. Yes, there is a tiny minority of really bad Elites in various influential areas of Western society; but they would not enjoy the influence and traction they do in fact enjoy, were there not a massive, broadly and deeply nutritional sociocultural context in which they move and swim.

          So Buffster, I do see that much of your formulations seems to agree with this. That said, however, on the other end of this problem, I am dismayed by the signs & symptoms of PC MC in your POV, indicating that you have not yet fully grasped the full horror of the situation of Islamic fanaticism and Islamic taqiyya. There are a few reasons why I say this; for now I will just note the following, where you disagreed with PGuud and you protested that we should not be advocating to —

          “…drive out or wipe out every person calling themselves “Muslim”, regardless of what they believe as individuals and what they actually *do* as individuals.”

          and you went on to explain:

          “That actually would be bigotry and injustice. It’s just as bigoted and unjust as considering a man’s religion or race before deciding whether to prosecute his crimes.”

          This train of thought indicates two things to me: 1) you must see the problem of Islam as being not as systemic and metastasizing as I think it is, where those two descriptors pertain directly, necessarily and pre-eminently to the threat of terrorism (thus making terrorism a danger this will get worse and worse — hence “metasasizing” — unless we do something to stem what is facilitating it), rather than some vaguely amorphously cultural threat to our “values”; and 2) you seem to minimize the problem of taqiyya with regard to #1 — i.e., to think we have the ability to discern which Muslims are dangerous and which are not, rendering our problem of security that much easier, when there is no rational reason to think we can ever do that whenever there are terror threats (which includes long-range covert planning by cells deeply burrowed into our societies hiding in plain sight through false assimilation).

          (Ironically, I note that PGuud wrings his hands in typical PC MC fashion about those poor Japanese-Americans who were interned.)

          These two things seem to be quite common in the Counter-Jihad (and, of course, throughout the Western Mainstream)

          But tyrants of a feather flock tog

        • voegelinian says

          Mar 18, 2015 at 5:22 pm

          Woops: disregard those last couple of lines in my last post…

  10. Joe Shmo says

    Mar 15, 2015 at 11:00 pm

    Apalling. I still can’t get my head around how our leaders are betraying us. The new definition of insanity is the PC world we live in now.

  11. S.SuchindranathAiyer says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 1:09 am

    Britain is following in the foot steps of India. If nothing else, this confirms the growing opinion that Khilafat Gandhi and the Nehru-Gandhis’ Khangress Party are a British-Saudi franchise:

    • Joe says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 5:00 am

      Gandhi was the only non-muslim in a pro-Caliphate delegation which visited Lloyd George after WW1, trying to pressure him to preserve the Caliphate.

      Gandhi clearly did not object to imperialism. He objected to imperialism by Britain. Islamic imperialism was fine and dandy. Never mind that islamic imperialism was a slave economy, whilst it was the British empire which made slavery illegal, including in Gandhi’s India.

      • voegelinian says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 3:41 pm

        Yes; Gandhi was a colossal idiot. Yet another grotesque feather (practically beatified) in the monstrously over-inflated cap of PC MC, bedecked & bedizened with fruit & flowers.

  12. Edward says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 1:20 am

    Liberalism (no thanks to its founder, John Locke) is the cause of all that ills this world…..those that advocate this radical social philosophy goes beyond the original intent, which its purpose was to oversee equality for all. Sadly, this ideology has spawned to one that professes control. Doing things by emotions instilled upon the masses instead by reasoning of individuals. This is ploy is exactly what Satan utilizes to spread its evil. Lets say that the ones that fall to the Evil One’s rule can be called Its proxies here in earth.

    If the Brits had embraced the wisdom of one their own, G K Chesterton, they would not be in this horrible mess they are in now.

    “We call a man a bigot or a slave of dogma because he is a thinker who has thought thoroughly and to a definite end.” – G K Chesterton quote

    We should all be individual thinkers……as an individual who has thought thoroughly and to a definite end.

    • ECAW says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 6:26 am

      I have to disagree with you. Liberalism as it was understood until recently was fine.

      Unfortunately it has been hijacked by people who call themselves progressives (just consider the narcissism implied by that word). Liberals of 30 years ago would never have protected misogyny, anti-semitism or hostility to freedom of speech and conscience but that’s just what you will find today in the supposedly liberal heartland of the Guardian aka the Daily Dhimmi.

      • ECAW says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 6:28 am

        Ah, reading your comment more carefully, I see we’re not disagreeing at all. Oops.

        • Edward says

          Mar 17, 2015 at 12:14 am

          “Ah, reading your comment more carefully, I see we’re not disagreeing at all.”

          We are! However, thank you ECAW for critiquing my comment. By this I became aware that my original sentence (below} was lacking extra words to convey the right tone of what has happened to the old Democratic Party. As you see I borrowed your word “hijacked”, while editing, to complete the thought.

          Thinking! Where are the 40’s Sam Rayburn’s (House Speaker) and John Nance Garner’s [aka Cactus Jack] (FDR’s Vice-President) gone! There were more bipartisan politicians than today’s DC’s hooligans. I grew up in the late 30’s and I remember them well. Most of them were men of high integrity, except those that were part of a political machine like the ones from Pharr County, Texas; who were part of a political dynasty.

          This sentence has been revised:

          ‘….those that advocate this [hijacked] social philosophy since the 70’s goes beyond the original intent, which its sole purpose was to oversee equality for all before that decade. Sadly, this new perverted ideology has spawned to be one that professes total control of the masses!’

          Democratic progressive’s movement mirrors that of the ISIS, but not as gory. The Progressive’s minimizes our liberties, while the ISIS downsizes the population to show who is in charge of their future. Coerced control by both movements, however!.

    • cs says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 2:36 pm

      I just don’t think so, there were huge beneficial migration into the UK, just this one is troublesome, everyone honest with himself can tell you, there is no problems among the communities but with Islam, to me this is more to do with a clash of civilizations and world views.

      • Michael Copeland says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 6:41 pm

        Stoning? “Honor”-killings? Amputation? Forced child marriage? Genital mutilation? Free legalised murder of homosexuals and apostates? Flogging?
        No. Those do not qualify as “civilisation”. It is a clash of civilisation against barbarism.

    • voegelinian says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 3:43 pm

      If John Locke was the founder of “Liberalism”, how is it that Michel de Montaigne, some 400 years earlier, displayed nearly all the premises, assumptions, and conclusions of PC MC?

      To see why I say this, see my detailed essay on Montaigne:

      Montaigne: Godfather of PC MC?

      http://hesperado.blogspot.com/2009/02/montaigne-godfather-of-pc-mc.html

      • gravenimage says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 5:25 pm

        Yes—that’s an excellent article, Voeg.

        The roots of PC/MC are largely well-intentioned, but can be suicidal when misapplied.

        The simplest way to put it is to quote Thomas Mann: “Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil”.

        • cs says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 6:05 pm

          Yes, because Montaigne is a great writer, I did not read all his essays, I think I did read 25% of them, there are great stuff there.

      • Edward says

        Mar 17, 2015 at 3:18 pm

        voegelinian,

        John Locke (1632–1704) was the founder of the Classical liberalism. Lock was greatly influenced by the Enlighten Age period thought movement; that was envisioned by Montaigne earlier as you noted

        “Montaigne is often hailed as a precursor to the Enlightenment because of his corrosive skepticism that “- hesperado.blogspot.com

      • TheBuffster says

        Mar 18, 2015 at 2:23 am

        Voegelinian, your Montaigne essay is a brilliant piece of thought and writing.

        I’m glad to know about Montaigne’s input into the MC mix.

        There are many philosophers of the Enlightenment period who contributed both crucial ideas for liberty and rights and reason, and very misguided destructive ideas that have been at war with each other ever since. Sometimes the same thinker contributed the seeds of both nutritious and poisonous plants.

        And that is something I’ve been well aware of for decades, since my early 20s.

        Now that I’ve read your extremely intelligent essay and have re-read the post of mine that you criticised, I am even more confused as to why you thought I was saying what you thought I was saying. My emphasis is always on *ideas*, on convincing minds, on helping people to break out of the PC bubble by offering something better.

        True, I didn’t reference the thinkers of the past who have contributed to today’s philosophical train wreck (and I could not have referenced Montaigne on this point, since I didn’t know about his contribution), but given what I was answering, it didn’t seem appropriate or necessary.

        It looks to me that you and I and Prodos (my husband) are all on the same track.

  13. mortimer says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 1:39 am

    More and more, I believe Muslims must be segregated permanently from civilized people. They are too primitive, irrational and angry to be allowed near us and our dear families.

    • voegelinian says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 3:51 pm

      Before I can believe and trust mortimer, he has some ‘splainin’ to do — viz., how he comports such a remark as he makes above with those he has made previously; to wit:

      There are ‘moderate’ Muslims, but they are somewhat confused about what Islam is…and they make up their own delusional, more tolerant version of ‘peaceful Islam’. Wahhabism is ‘real Islam’. Foundational Islam (Salafism) is real Islam.

      There is no mechanism to create ‘moderate Islam’, but the ‘moderate Muslims’ simply ignore it. They do exist, but their beliefs have no basis.

      and:

      Most Muslims are much nicer and more moral than Mohammed. They believe theoretically, but most do not practice all the things required by Islam. Perhaps 85% of Muslims are non-practicing ‘hypocrites’. Only 15% are observant.

      So when mortimer now says “I believe Muslims must be segregated permanently from civilized people”, does he mean only that magical 15% he, with his magical powers of mind-reading millions and millions of Muslim minds, can discern? Or does he mean all Muslims? And if the latter, why has he changed his mind?

  14. Gulag says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 3:17 am

    This Police Scum must serve Jail for their whole life!

  15. Aton says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 4:30 am

    A couple of thousand girls gang-raped?

    Thin again. The true number is over a million. And still the government fails to act….

    http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/arnold-ahlert/one-million-child-victims-of-muslim-rape-gangs-in-the-u-k/

    Aton

  16. Joe says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 5:09 am

    Tell Mama was launched on the very day that the major grooming trial in Rochdale began. That the Rochdale muslims were going on trial was known 6 months in advance. Even the opening day of the trial would have been known months in advance.

    That week, when I turned on my TV to see how the BBC was reporting the Rochdale trial, all I got was end-to-end muslim grievance-mongering. Instead of the schoolgirl victims, systematically groomed and exploited by mosque-going muslims, all we got was the BBC fawning over Fiyaz Mughal and his supposed 1000s of muslim victims.

    In the past 20 years, no muslim man has ever been racially murdered by white men in the UK, the way Kris Donald was in Glasgow, or Ross Paterson in Peterborough. No muslim schoolgirls were targeted by non-muslims for prostitution. No kafir was going round beheading imams, the way muslims were going round beheading soldiers or blowing up trains and buses. No gays are going round forcing muslims out of their city, but muslims have cleared east London of gay people. But under sharia, muslims can do no wrong to kafirs. The British elite are implementing sharia.

    Whilst there are 100s of muslim organisations which protect jihadis and groomers, there are no organisations which protect the indigenous population. MI5 will no longer even publish the statistics which showed how many muslims had been convicted of terrorism.

    • particolor says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 5:15 am

      You’ve Been Conquered !! 🙁 RIP !!

      • ECAW says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 6:07 am

        Not yet. No more than your country has been.

        The struggle is still in its opening stages. You’ve been listening to Robert Spencer too much.

        • particolor says

          Mar 16, 2015 at 6:22 am

          I don’t listen to anyone much !! And Least of all Politicians !
          And I’m not denying We are on the Barbarians List too !!

    • gravenimage says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 5:41 pm

      And Joe, “Tell Mama” is whining that Infidel parents haven’t wanted their children to visit a Mosque in Rotherham.

      They sneer at a parent concerned over both gender segregation and the Rotherham rape scandals: “The same parent stated that her son may be vulnerable by entering a mosque and that the recent grooming scandals meant he was at risk by entering a mosque.”

      Apparently, sneering at this concern is considered sufficient.

      “Parents Refuse to Send Their Children to A Mosque Visit in Rotherham”

      http://tellmamauk.org/parents-refuse-send-children-mosque-visit-rotherham/

      Here they are trying to characterize concern over child rape as “bigotry and prejudice”.

      I say kudos to these wise parents.

  17. cheesecake says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 6:20 am

    Most of these Muslim child rape gangs seem to operate out of labour controlled areas.it is not surprising labour councils either ignore or cover up the rape of native British girls by Muslim men.the labour party has a long history of hatred towards the native British and is so pro Muslim it would let them get away with anything as long as vote labour.

  18. RICHTHOFEN says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 6:39 am

    Regrettably, the politically correct hide-bound UK ‘establishment’ are too dumb to accept that islam is not a race- it is comprised of all kinds of ethnicities, including white. Realising that muslims are, because of their evil 7th century cult’s doctrine and mantra, not a race but a viral disease now pandemic across the world, spreading their hatred like a tsunami in an attempt to eradicate civilisation, beyond their intellectual capacity. In the pc British establishment, anything that they do not understand is simply put down by words such as ‘racist’, homophobe, etc – without realising that it is they that are the bigots – they are heterophobic, Christianophobic, Caucasianophobic – but they do not have the capacity to hold a proper discussion – they just shout any opposition down by attempting to silence people with what they consider to be insulting.phrases drawn directly from the common purpose, marxist, Frankfurt school dictionary

  19. Always On Watch says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 7:47 am

    Happening quietly in the United States, too? Probably.

    • Rob Crawford says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 12:14 pm

      Our problem is more with South and Central America slave brothels. Not all of the girls and women crossing the border ever escape the coyotes, and end up enslaved.

      It’s chilling to note that major leftwing organizations have shown support for such operations, rather than reject involvement.

  20. brenrod says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 9:02 am

    What sort of sick people hand their daughters over to muslim gangs to be gang raped: the British.
    No surprise here, they are too busy handing the Jews over to notice their daughters. The universe has a way of ironic justice but the Brits don’t get it yet..

    • Linda Rivera says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 11:45 am

      One father discovered the home where filthy Sons of the Devil-Muslims were holding his little girl as their sex slave. When the father tried to rescue his beloved daughter, the police were called and the Islam-adoring, satan worshiping police arrested the father. Please understand that gang raping, torturing and forcing into prostitution and sex slavery of indigenous little white British girls has the full approval and protection of British authorities.

      The question that must be asked. Do British authorities take part with Muslims in gang raping and torturing Britain’s severely persecuted young girls? Do British authorities get a percentage from the huge profits made by Muslims on the gang raped, tortured bodies of the British child sex slaves?

      My daily anger and grief over this is enormous. My anger and grief never leaves me.

  21. Dee says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 9:30 am

    These men that rape children should be put to death. This is horrible for little kids to have to deal with.

    • dave schwep says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 11:10 am

      Yes, one bullet to the head will quickly solve the problem and be quite cost effective –
      – can not imagine sacrificing our children to these basest of animals.

    • dave schwep says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 11:15 am

      One bullet to the head of each offender will quickly solve the problem and be quite cost effective –
      – can not imagine sacrificing our children to these basest of animals who will not stop at nothing.
      Woe to those in authority who side with these islamic rapists – they are complicit in the act against our children and our families.

      • Linda Rivera says

        Mar 16, 2015 at 12:07 pm

        That punishment is very light and very swift. God will give the proper punishment that the filth demonic Muslim monsters deserve: Eternal punishment in hell forever and ever.

        The authorities knew about this satanic evil for decades. The authorities approve it. They ignored the desperate pleas for help of the child sex slave victims. Along with the demonic, inhuman, sex slaver Muslim monsters, God’s punishment on them will also be terrifying.

  22. Nelson Abdullah says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 10:15 am

    There is one part of this article that bothers me because I keep recalling the cause and effect that happens when the Muslim population increases in a country. Dr. Peter Hammond compiled a reference that explains how Muslim demands change the society they live in as their numbers grow in his book “Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat” 4th Edition available at http://www.frontlinefellowship.net/inc/sdetail/119/1799 There is an excerpt from his book taken from this web site: http://www.islamreview.com/articles/Islam_is_not_a_religion.shtml

    We keep looking at the influence Muslims have today in Britain but a part of this story goes back 16-years. How much or how little influence did Muslims have back then to stop a police investigation. This is the part of the story I refer to:

    Retired detective Tony Brookes, who spent 30 years with the force, worked on inquiries in 2007 which led to six abusers being convicted, and he wanted to build on the case as he recognised the size of the problem.

    He said the issue of child sexual exploitation in Sheffield was ‘massive’ and bigger than in neighbouring Rotherham, where at least 1,400 children were abused over a 16-year-period.

    —————————————————–

    Clearly, was anyone taking notice of these crimes 16-years ago?

  23. thomas pellow says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 10:17 am

    “Further report on child sexual exploitation in Rotherham to be published”

    (-to be published March 17. Details below.)

    http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/communities-and-local-government-committee/news/2nd-rotherham-report-note/

  24. Jeremy Snell says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 10:57 am

    If one of my daughters was a “victim” of these animals, there would be a couple dozen less animals roaming the earth for prey – within a month…… with no remorse..

  25. Darren says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 1:58 pm

    I wonder how many young boys also got molested by the cult of mo, since apparently kissing young boys small p*nis is halal since the holy prophet did it, not to mention sucking on their tongues or lips. Also apparently owning dancing boys is A OK as well, petting a dog though is evil.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/afganistans-dancing-boys-are-invisible-victims/2012/04/04/gIQAyreSwS_story.html

    “And there shall wait on them [the Muslim men] young boys of their own, as fair as virgin pearls.”

    Hadith Number 16245, Volume Title: “The Sayings of the Syrians,” Chapter Title: “Hadith of Mu’awiya Ibn Abu Sufyan”:

    “I saw the prophet – pbuh – sucking on the tongue or the lips of Al-Hassan son of Ali, may the

    prayers of Allah be upon him. For no tongue or lips that the prophet sucked on will be tormented (by hell fire)

    He (the Prophet) lift up his (al Hassan’s) shirt and kissed his (little) p*nis..”

    روى أنه صلى الله عليه و سلم قبل زبيبة الحسن أو الحسين

    He (the prophet) kissed the (little) p*nis of al Hassan or al Husein

    رأيت النبي صلى الله عليه و سلم فرج ما بين فخذي الحسين و قبل زبيبته

    He (the prophet) put Husein’s legs apart and kissed his (little) p*nis

    Another Hadith. Majma al-Zawa’id, Ali ibn Abu Bakr al-Haythami, 299/9 مجمع الزوائد لعلي بن أبى بكر الهيثمي

    رأيت رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم فرج ما بين فخذي الحسين و قبل زبيبته

    رواه الطبراني و إسناده حسن

    translated into English: “I saw the Messenger of Allah pbuh putting Husein’s legs apart and kissing his (little) p*nis.”

    Related by Al-Tabarani and it’s authentication is fully validated by Islamic scholars.

    Hussein and Hassan is not the same name, so clearly this is of two accounts and he kissed more than one p*nis.

    Muhammad would also invite young boys to see him wash his private parts:

    Narrated Anas bin Malik:

    Whenever Allah’s Apostle went to answer the call of nature, I along with
    another boy used to accompany him with a tumbler full of water. (Hisham
    commented, “So that he might wash his private parts with it.”) (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 4, Number 152; see also Numbers 153-154)

    Other sick practices of Muhammad include having his young child bride wipe s*men off his clothes:

    Narrated ‘Aisha:

    I used to wash the traces of Janaba (s*men) from the clothes of the Prophet and he used to go for prayers while traces of water were still on it (water spots were still visible). (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 4, Number 229)

    Narrated Sulaiman bin Yasar:

    I asked ‘Aisha about the clothes soiled with s*men. She replied, “I used
    to wash it off the clothes of Allah’s Apostle and he would go for the
    prayer while water spots were still visible.” (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 4, Number 231; see also Number 232)

    Narrated ‘Aisha:

    I used to wash the s*men off the clothes of the Prophet and even then I used to notice one or more spots on them. (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 4, Number 233)

    • gravenimage says

      Mar 16, 2015 at 6:00 pm

      Darren, I’ve often wondered if these ravening Mohammedans have been victimizing boys as well. I would not be surprised.

  26. gravenimage says

    Mar 16, 2015 at 5:12 pm

    UK police told not to investigate Muslim rape gangs
    ……………………………

    This story keeps getting worse all the time.

    How could *any* police authority claim that “car crimes” should have a higher priority than the organized exploitation and rape *of children*?

  27. Shastri says

    Mar 17, 2015 at 5:51 am

    Wish I had this information before I published “The Endless Agony of England’s Daughters” in indiafacts.co.in …. regret failure to cover sheffield … http://indiafacts.co.in/the-endless-agony-of-englands-daughters/

  28. R Cole says

    Mar 17, 2015 at 4:11 pm

    Most of the UK and Europe’s Muslims have at least one parent who was born – in an Islamic nation. [Even as one of their grandparents is born in the EU or Europe ~ to say something of the mindset.]

    East Meets West….

    And there in places like Pakistan ~ if you are a Muslim male you have free reign over non-Muslim girls and women. The law would be on your side – if not written ~ most definitely in practice. For example, an abduction, forcible marriage and conversion to Islam of a Hindu or Christian girl ~ would be seen as a ‘religious matter’ ~ of which the Pakistani police say ‘they cannot interfere’. In Egypt the abducted Coptic girl is at times brought to the police station where her father ~ is coerced into signing away all rights ~ to her abductor ~ the Muslim man who desires her.

    In all these countries Muslims are given priority under the law. Out of “respect for Islam” some in the UK sought to do the same.

    ::

    Under the UK Left government – there could not be any criticism of Islam or Muslim actions – and in doing so – they brought Pakistan [and other Muslim majority countries with sizable non-Muslim populations to speak of] to the UK.

    ::

    The Left’s position of being absolutely right on all matters Islamic – has led to one disaster after another.

    They lazily try to fit criticism of Islam into a classic anti-racism model ~ clearly it does not fit.

    A Sinking Ship…

    You’re going to have ex-Muslims… who would voice an anti-religion opinion… just where did the Left think they were going with this ? It was always going to backfire ~ because it did not uphold human rights/freedoms – for short term gain it sought to defy them.

    But more, by not prosecuting Muslim crimes against non-Muslim girls on this scale ~ had to have political motivation ~ where doing the right thing by possibly hundreds of thousands of vulnerable British girls ~ would risk losing the Muslim vote.

    That should be seen as a crime in itself.

    And it all boiled down to ~ threatening people with the cheap and flimsy racism labels ~ so they would do better in the polls.

  29. peter williams says

    Mar 17, 2015 at 5:59 pm

    If it was a BRITISH GROOMING GANG THEY WOULD SOON INVESTGATE
    PROVES THE BRITISH POLICE PICK AND CHOOSE WHAT THEY INVESTGATE

  30. Andrew R says

    Mar 17, 2015 at 8:17 pm

    I don’t know why they keep saying Racism, because its a belief not a race. And the british police now fortfeit their obligation over one of the most serious brutal, vile forms of exploitation to human beings. Whats next ?. Muslims are now freely allowed to commit acts of crime and be free to do so in their will with out facing justice of any kind ? because the police are scared that word Racism . I find it very hard to believe that when people claim that it is a religion of Peace that has caused more problems to the world than any other religion by far, and yet not just Britain but the entire world continues to turn a blind eye to the reality of what it truly is, Actions speak louder than words. All you need to do is look at the evidence that is happening right now. These people are not offended when its all over the news about ISIS and terrorist organisations, but when the police try and do their job they get offended because they believe they are being victimised and only then do they speak out. Every word of peace that comes out of their mouths is a lie.

    • PetRats says

      Mar 19, 2015 at 7:19 pm

      Now you know what the anti-European, anti-Seimitic, pro-Arab, pro-Muslim British did to Jews in the l;adn that was set aside fore their historixc homeland. They stood by and let Amin al-Husseini and his Palestinian Psychopaths murder Jewish men, women, and children from 1929 until they pulled out of Mandated “Jewish Homeland” (not Palestine). The Arab riots of 1936-39 wsere vblamed on the Jews who were coming to live on the land bought from Arab shieks.

      Unlike the British, Areabs, or Muslims, Zonist Jews were not colonialist, imperialist conquerers. The only land that was not stolen at the point of a sword is the land purchased by Zionists.

      The British have always kissed Arab asses because they depended on them for their oil and their help during WWII. The Jews were willing and able to help them drive Nazis out of N. Afrika, but neither the British or the Arab League wanted to see an armed Jew lest that Jew use the gun to defend himself.

      Some of the Jews decided it was time to stop playing “Mr Nice Guy” while their sisters ansd motjhers were being raped and their brothers, fathers, and sons were being slaughtered. So, there ere two groups that formewd: One was like a state militia, the Irgun, defending their lives, while a small group known as the Stern Gang (and outlawed when Israel became a state) used the same terrorist tactics of Arabs and Muslims against them, and the British.

      But, even though they launched terrorist attacks, they always warned the British 30 minutes before an attack was to occur. It was the British who refused to take orders “from those dirty Jews.” That’s why there were British casualties in the King David Hotel bombing.

      The British restricted immigration by Jews to placate the Arab Leraguer while opening up Mandated Palestine to unrestricted immigration on Jewish- bought land.

      Fast forward 65 years, and the British are, once again, kowtowing to the Muslims. So, the only solution is to fight fire with fire.

      The families of women raped shouyld go into Muslim neighborhoods and do what they do when they are insulted or what they do to their own daughters if they want to assimilate or iof they are raped and “bring shame” to their family.

      It’s time for some urban renewal – Islamic-style.

  31. Rahul Shastri says

    Mar 17, 2015 at 8:52 pm

    In my humble view, the west is using forensic niceties and legal procedures against an overgrown underworld monster … When cancer grows beyond measure … surgery does not help .. only chemotherapy which has the nature of carpet bombing works …

    Nice, neat, forensic procedures, are easily paralysed by an overgrown underworld, which is neither fettered by legalese, procedures nor by human rights. The first beginning has to be made with recognition, that once outlawry expands beyond the scope of law, then it cannot continue to enjoy the protection of law .. that protection of law cannot equally apply between the law abiding and outlaws … that the former are entitled to priority in the operation and application of law …

    The time for human rights and niceties obtains only when outlawry operates on the margins and fringes, not when it has expanded to occupy centrestage …

    This requires a major philosophical break with simpering liberalism … and a turnaround can start only when that is done …

  32. boes_adipoes says

    Mar 19, 2015 at 10:30 am

    Elites have always abused children, so it is no wonder, that from above deadlock has been ordered. Look at Belgium with the paedo-elite and Dutroux. I wish, there was a mob in Rotherham to show those wussy police-cunts what to do…

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Hoi Polloi on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • OLD GUY on Why so many Muslims can’t wait for Biden to get inaugurated
  • gravenimage on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • OLD GUY on Biden vows to surrender to Iran, then negotiate
  • Peter Clemerson on New study reveals that Muslim religiosity strongly linked to hatred towards the West

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.