A doctor? But…but…poverty causes terrorism! And a “jihad for Islam” in the Islamic State? But…but…the Islamic State has nothing to do with Islam!
“Perth doctor joins ISIS medical team in ‘jihad for Islam’ against the west,” News.com.au, April 25, 2015:
A PERTH doctor has appeared in an Islamic State propaganda video urging medicos to join his jihad.
Dr Tareq Kamleh is filmed cradling a newborn baby in a hospital in the Islamic State stronghold of Raqqa in Syria, saying: “Please consider coming, please don’t delay.’’
The blue-eyed paediatrician says he is offering his medical services as part of his “jihad for Islam”.
The Sunday Times can reveal Dr Kamleh made multiple visits to an army surplus store in Perth late last year to buy gear for his trip.
The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency website shows he was registered as a medical practitioner in Subiaco in 2010.
A former friend said Dr Kamleh, now going by the name Abu Yusuf, left Perth for Adelaide to begin his medical degree about 10 years ago.
After graduating from Adelaide University, he began his pediatrics career at the Women’s and Children’s Hospital.
The friend, who knew Dr Kamleh when he was a paediatric registrar in 2011, said he showed no signs of radicalisation.
“I am just shocked and sort of saddened for him because it’s the end of his life in Australia, I imagine,” the friend said.
The video introduces the “ISHS” – or IS Health Service – and features a number of doctors talking about medical facilities.
Dr Kamleh is filmed telling converts that his only regret is not joining the terrorist state sooner.
A worker at the Perth surplus store said a man instantly recognisable as the doctor in the video made multiple visits last December.
The worker said the man spent $400 on a backpack, jacket, socks and several pairs of pants popular with security contractors in the Middle East.
“He didn’t speak about Islam or anything to do with religion during the entire conversation,” he said.
“Take away the beard and I just thought he was a young doctor going overseas to do his part.”…
Jaladhi says
Ah, these “moderate” Muslims who migrate to the West, get shelter and good life here and then they join ISIS to join in jihad against the West!!
There are no moderate Muslims – they all have one aim to s=destroy w=everything that is not Islamic. Stop all Muslim immigration and ban Islam in all non-Muslim countries.
The West has been so fooled by Muslims that it is beyond belief!!
Alex says
Actually there are moderate Muslims (as Mr Spencer often says). However, that’s because most of them have never read the Qu’ran/Hadith. Once they become religious, that’s when trouble starts brewing.
I agree that we should stop muslim immigration asap.
Don McKellar says
That’s right. There certainly are moderate moslems, and they are in the majority — but far more people in the modern, advanced world need to understand what that means. It means that they are simply lax in their religion and religious duties as clearly laid out in the koran and the hadiths. It’s an enormous amount of work and self-sacrifice to be a devout moslem, which means becoming a full-on organized criminal by any modern legal definition.
Peggy says
It still doesn’t mean that they won’t support and even hide the devout Muslims.
How many come out to protest in our streets? For each one who comes out in protest how many are at home morally supporting them but for some reason cannot come out?
You don’t have to be a practicing Muslim to be radical. It might be too hard to pray five times a day and abstain from alcohol but that doesn’t mean they don’t love and believe in Islam.
Just like us Christians. We might not go to church regularly and live like early Christians but we believe in it and would fight for it.
So, I really believe that majority of Muslims are dangerous.
Daniel Triplett says
@Peggy
That’s right Peggy. All Muslims are Jihadists, as required my Quranic law.
They either swing the sword, or support those swinging the sword.
Daniel Triplett says
@Peggy
“by” Quranic law, not my Quranic law. Lord help me.
duh_swami says
If they are not pious, they are not Mahoundian…There is no such thing as a ‘moderate’ Mahoundian…
PRCS says
I disagree.
The vast majority of the world’s Muslims ARE moderates–in that, for whatever reason, they do not attempt to fully comply with Islam’s myriad teachings, demands, and expectations.
Not those Muslims who are prohibited by law from full compliance, but those Muslims who could make the attempt, but don’t.
Irshad Manki (yeh, I know) willfully shirks her Islamic duties while publicly labeling herself a Muslim. Ditto Zhudi Jasser..
In truth, despite their best efforts, Jihad Johnny included, there are probably NO fully compliant Muslims anywhere on the planet.
As DM opines above (allow me to paraphrase, please): It would take more work and sacrifice than humanly possible for a Muslim to even attempt full compliance with the expectations of Muhammad and his sock puppet, Allah.
IMO.
Daniel Triplett says
Some Muslims are less disciplined than the ISIS variety, but that makes them no less of a Muslim, and no less dangerous. When the shooting gets started in the upcoming World War of Muslims v non-Muslims, whose side do you think the so called “moderate” Muslims will take?
I don’t attend Church every Sunday or pray before each meal, but I’m no less of a Christian than one who does. That doesn’t make me a “moderate” Christian, just less disciplined. But I believe in the Bible and the Lord’s Word every bit as any other Christian.
PRCS says
“but that makes them no less of a Muslim”
Not in the eyes of their more disciplined brethren, I’d say.
Moderate Muslims–those who know what Islam teaches–are like Catholics who use artificial birth control methods. Each has chosen to not comply.
The issue I raise is not what a moderate Muslim would do in the future, but rather that there ARE moderate Muslims.
And, based upon your described behavior, I would say that your are a moderate Christian.
Peggy says
Precisely. You are no less a Christian than the one who prays every Sunday and before meals. You would die for Christianity just like a so called moderate Muslim for Islam.
I don’t care what is thinks of a moderate Muslim because when push comes to shove they would all kill us and that’s enough for me to be afraid of them and want them out.
Daniel Triplett says
@PRCS
I was commenting from my perspective as an infidel, not that of any Muslim. Of course, trying to identify what’s going on inside their demonic possessed minds would be just a guess.
I agree with you though that many Muslim groups are slaughtering each other because they consider the other offending group “not-Muslim-enough-apostates.” And if they’d just stick to killing each other, that would be fine. But they also want to kill the rest of us too, don’t they. There’s the problem.
Of course, the main reason the Shia and Sunni like to slaughter each other is because each one wants to be king of the hill and rule the World when the rest of us are killed or subjugated for the glory of Allah. But they don’t disagree at all about what should happen to all of us non-Muslims.
This is obviously a subjective debate between us, and we can each have our own opinion in the end.
The way I see it, a person either believes “There is only one god, Allah, and Mohammad is his Prophet,” or he doesn’t believe it. [AND I FEEL SO CREEPED OUT EVEN WRITING THAT, I WANT TO MAKE CLEAR TO MY LORD JESUS CHRIST I NEITHER BELIEVE ALLAH IS god, NOR MOHAMMAD IS his prophet]
I think it’s pretty cut and dry. You believe that or you don’t. And I can never trust anyone who believes that. The degree of discipline they exercise in their faith varies between individuals, but can change in a heartbeat. The point in the story of the doctor in Robert’s article above is that this seemingly normal doctor became what seemed to be a harmless Muslim, but later, because of reasons known only to him, he turned into the much more disciplined and dangerous variety of Muslim.
The unpleasant fact is we have neither the time, money, nor method to sort out the “good” Muslims from the bad ones that would kill us if given the opportunity. Did you know one out of seven US KIAs in Afghanistan are caused by US trained Afghan troops turning their guns on us?
Are there any good Muslims anyway? People buying into Islam, who believe the evil contained between the covers of the Quran is the literal word of their god, and Mohammad is the perfect man they’re required to emulate, have hearts and souls manipulated by demons. I wouldn’t trust one to be my doctor, or my pilot, or anything else. That’s like trusting a rattlesnake.
Our grandfathers faced the same problem in WWII. They had not the time, money, or method to sort out the good Japanese and Germans from the bad ones. So they essentially killed every enemy man, woman, and child in sight during the devastating and highly persuasive Strategic Area Bombing campaigns until they got unconditional surrender.
Although Allah (Satan) may demand his followers pray or attend mosque at regular intervals, Jesus Christ does not.
Jesus told him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one can come to the Father except through me.” John 14:6 NLT
Pretty simple.
I believe a person who believes in The Holy Trinity is a Christian. You either believe it or you don’t. There are no “radical” or “moderate” Christians in that regard.
I can’t speak for The Good Lord Almighty, of course, but I believe He simply requires us to repent of our sins, and ask Him to come into our hearts to be our Lord & Savior. That’s it. However else you choose to practice your faith and exercise your relationship with Him is really just between you and Him. And it’s no other man’s place to judge your relationship with Him as being “moderate” or in any way less divine than any other man’s.
No, I don’t attend Church every Sunday (although I do attend), nor do I pray before every meal (but often I do). But I do have my own solid relationship with Jesus Christ, and I would die before forsaking Him. I also wore a Crusader Cross ring on my finger on every combat mission I flew during the war, and still wear it. There was never a doubt in my mind we were fighting a Crusade for Christ against Satan.
So, if all that makes a man like me a “moderate,” lesser Christian in your mind, that’s up to you. But I don’t believe He thinks any less of me, and that all that matters to me anyway.
Champ says
Actually there are moderate Muslims (as Mr Spencer often says).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh Really! …and how “often” does Robert talk about “moderate muslims”? Methinks you’re mistaken.
And it’s important to note that not all muslims are terrorists, but the vast majority of terrorists are muslims.
Peggy says
They might not all be practicing terrorists but they are all terrorists at heart. Who do you think they would die for, Islam or you?
PRODOS says
Jaladhi writes: “Stop all Muslim immigration and ban Islam in all non-Muslim countries.”
I can get behind stopping Muslim immigration.
But how do you “ban Islam”?
I don’t see how Law is equipped to ban a bad or evil ideology.
I don’t see how this would be done or how it can be done.
Communism is not banned. .Environmentalism (which is at least as nihilistic than Islam) is not banned.
Post-modern philosophy and its teaching in Universities is not banned.
The writing of books that falsely accuse Australia of having a racist, genocidal history is not banned.
However, what is banned is much of free speech.
Anti “race hate” laws are quite muscular in Australia and make it difficult to speak openly and critically about Islam, Sharia, Halal certification, etc.
It was in part the attempt to ban Anti-Semitism that made these laws possible. It seemed like a good idea at the time. Anti-Semitism is evil … so let’s ban it.
Now we see these laws are quite an obstacle to openly and freely tackling something like Islam.
Best Wishes,
PRODOS
duh_swami says
The US banned communism at one time…
PRODOS says
duh_swami wrote: “The US banned communism at one time…”
Are you referring to The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) ?
Jaladhi says
When the framers of constitution enshrined freedom of religion, they never thought Islam would come here and present a problem for us. Islam is an evil ideology and Quran the hate manual against the entire humanity. If Islam continues its way without any opposition from the West, it will destroy the good in the world. The West has to call evil an evil and confront Islam and Muslims that murderous and atrocious behavior can’t continue. If we don’t do it – Muslims will continue their mayhem and murders throughout the world until they win. Its our choice either save the humanity and our civilization or just become evil like them.
PRODOS says
Jaladhi wrote: “When the framers of constitution enshrined freedom of religion, they never thought Islam would come here and present a problem for us.”
The American First Amendment states:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
The question for me is: Does Islam qualify under this Amendment?
1. Mosques, funded by foreign (non-American) governments which are themselves hostile to religious freedom seem, to me, to fall outside this clause. I would argue that they are in fact in breach of this clause and that those Mosques can and should be banned.
2. Although an ideology may call itself a “religion”, to the extent that the ideology advocates or endorses violence against non-believers, apostates, or heretics, or even advocates the formation of an alternative government …. to that extent I believe it falls outside of this clause. The test wouldn’t be merely whether some of its adherents resort to violence. Rather, if the violence inherent in the religion itself. The problem with Islam — just going on the Koran and the Hadith … if we remove the religiously applauded use of violence, there isn’t much left is there?
(Need to sign off for now. Maybe more later.)
Best Wishes,
PRODOS
Peggy says
You can ban anything at the stroke of a pen.
Problem is that there won’t be mosques to pray in or no public display of that cult but it will be drive underground.
This would make it very hard to the cult to keep advancing especially if coupled with long prison sentences if someone was caught practicing it thus reducing terror around the world but can it be sustainable forever?
It’s a very difficult task now. They are in our countries in great numbers. We have missed the boat on controlling it.
PRODOS says
Peggy wrote: “… They (Muslims) are in our countries in great numbers. We have missed the boat on controlling it.”
By repealing laws which limit free speech — laws which empower those who pose as “offended” by what is no more than the robust criticism or mockery which should be commonplace in every democracy — and by supporting the strong defence of free speech, a great deal can be accomplished.
Currently, in Australia for instance, it is possible to incur massive expenses and time-waste on anyone who can be branded “Islamophobic”.
Britain prevented Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller from visiting. Again, this is a breach of the democratic principles of free speech and free association
Opening up and defending free speech is more effective than “banning Islam”.
Giving politicians the power to ban ideologies is dangerous and unreliable.
Oliver says
I agree that Muslims have to be controlled. But the banning? I see the same issues ( and problems) that confronted the UUSR when it banned religious ( especially Jewish) schools (Yeshivas) and synagogues. It drove them underground.
And, while not exactly flourishing while underground, still existed. And the KGB/NKVD ( depending upon the year) were much more vigilant and ruthless in their crackdowns then the US could or would be.
I see banning as not possible.
pumbar says
Try setting up a Holocaust denial conference in Israel, Germany or Hungary (for example). This ideology is totally against the law in those (and other) countries.
sidney penny says
Read the whole thing -its free-how to ban the koran-
What, about hate?
And about the other things like inciting violence, insulting other religions, promoting religious enmity, disturbing public tranquility, promoting on ground of religion feelings of enmity- ( see below)
The real issue raised by the Petition was not what Muslims believe about the Quran but what behaviour patterns the Quran inculcates in its votaries vis-à-vis the unbelievers.
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/tcqp/pref1.htm
Let it be realized by everybody concerned that India has always been and remains, the citadel of the most bigoted and bloodthirsty zealotry of Islam. The historical reasons for why it is so, are many. I do not have the time to detail them here. The main reason may be told. Islam in India has been what it has been because India has continued to stare at Islam as its greatest failure. Islam in India has never been able to relax, as it could do in countries which it converted completely. And it will not relax till Hindus learn to knock out its ideological fangs which are rooted in the Quran.
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/tcqp/chi1.htm
Muslims in India have often sought shelter under Sections 153A and 295A of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.) for preventing every public discussion of their creed in general and of their prophet in particular.
Quite a few publications which examine critically the sayings and doings of the Prophet or other idolized personalities of Islam, have been proscribed under Section 95 of the Criminal Procedure Code , as a result of pressure exerted by vociferous, very often violent Muslim protests.
Little did they suspect that the same provisions of the law could be invoked for seeking a ban on their holy book, the Quran.
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/tcqp/chii4.htm
Now the summary of the petition-but read the whole thing:
1. The petitioners are the citizens of India and are engaged in various types of social work.
2. The respondent (Government) is a public authority having in terms of Section 95 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, read with Sections 153A and 295A Indian Penal Code, a public duty to forfeit to the Government every copy of a book,
which incites violence, disturbs public tranquility, promotes, on ground of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities and insults other religions or religious beliefs of other communities in India.
3. The Koran, also spelt as Quran, the so-called religious book of the Muslims the world over, written originally in the Arabic and available throughout India in the original Arabic or in its translation in Urdu, Bengali, Hindi, English, etc., is ex facie guilty of each one of the above offences.
4 The Book has verses which preached cruelty, incited violence and disturbed public tranquility
For example, (see the many examples given in chapter 4)(one quoted by the London beheader of Lee Rigby)
5 The book promotes religious enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities in India.
(see the many examples given in chapter 5)
6 The book insults other religions or religious beliefs of other communities in India.
(see the many examples given in chapter 6)
7 While the Koran abounds with saying which incite violence, insult the religious beliefs of other communities and even exhort the Muslims to kill and murder non-Muslims, the problem is aggravated by yet another fact which has been true in the past and is universally true in our own times that unlike other communities Muslims are, and even fresh converts tend to become, highly orthodox people and follow the sayings of the book with a fanatical zeal with the result that whichever country has their sizable number amongst its population can never have peace on its soil.
(This was said in 1985 and it is still true today 2015!)
8. The offending expressions contained in the Koran and quoted in paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 above are not so offensive in their translation in which they are so quoted as they are in the original verses in Arabic or in Urdu, the very sound of whose inimitable symphony not only sends the Muslims to tears and ecstasy but arouses in them the worst communal passions and religious fanaticism which have manifested themselves in murder, slaughter, loot, arson, rape and destruction or desecration of holy places in historical times as also in contemporary period not only in India but almost all over the world.
Jack Diamond says
The Calcutta Petition was dismissed by a judge as disruptive to religious harmony, the Qur’an was not banned. Further, the petitioners made it clear they were not seeking the banning of books only to promote public discussion of what was taught in the Qur’an. That said, the Petition remains an excellent reference for explaining the source of the problem.
Aussie Infidel says
Jaladhi, I have had a lot to do with Muslims over many decades, and I can attest that there are some ‘moderates’. But they are the ones who have either lost their faith completely, and are essentially Atheists; or have secretly converted to Christianity; or they don’t practise their faith because they simply cannot identify with it for social, political, moral or other reasons. Most moderates remain within their religion, for family reasons, or out of fear of reprisal from the miltiants. They would be only a few percent of the total.
Of course, some Muslims have also left Islam completely, and joined the ranks of ex-Muslims. But apostasy is usually only possible for Muslims, once they migrate to the dar-al-harb, where they can mingle with the kuffar, and escape the attention of their pious ‘brothers’ who might otherwise kill them. To appreciate how difficult it is to leave Islam, you have to understand Islamic culture, and the role that ‘fear’ and obedience to the dictates of the mosque, plays in their lives. Most Westerners have absolutely no idea.
Islam is not just a religion, but a criminal political ideology hiding behind the veil of a religion, and as such it should have its religious status repealed, and be proscribed as a criminal organization. All mosques should be closed down, since they continually preach criminal activity; and all foreign imams should be deported. All Muslims who do not have citizenship, should be offered the chance to convert from Islam to whatever religion they choose – or none – and the rest should be deported. All Muslim schools should be closed, and used for general education purposes. Schools of Middle Eastern Studies at universities, should be thoroughly scrutinized to ensure they provide students with a true account of ME history; and the tenure of their academics revised. No compensation should paid to any person or organization, for property confiscated, since it should be regarded as ‘proceeds of crime’. All Muslim immigration should be stopped forthwith, since Islam is contrary to all Western values, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Failure to undertake these steps, will eventually result in the decimation of Western civilization – pure and simple. Turning the other cheek, or martyring oneself for the cause (as has often been suggested on this blog), is crazy and will only ensure that the Muslims eventually win their ‘holy war’ against us.
You are right about the West being fooled by Muslims, while all the time plotting our downfall and engaging in stealth jihad to infiltrate our countries and institutions. However, it is easy to simply blame others for the problems we now face – and I am guilty of that too. But this is war! And we must direct our efforts at real world solutions which will defeat Islam once and for all. The alternative is unthinkable!
Lia Wissing says
Let’s hope it’s the end of this dr in Australia!
xxxChurch100 says
Don’t be surprised if he tries to charge it to Medicare .!!
Peggy says
If it wasn’t the end of Dr. Craig Jurisic who not only went to Kosovo to treat Albanians but took up arms himself and killed which is in violation of the oath all doctors take.
Now he is practicing in Australia as if he never went and supported the KLA (terrorist organisation taken off the list for convenience).
He has blood on his hands which is also the title of his book.
So if this killer can practice again why not this doctor who so far has not killed anyone.
Chabuco says
>urging medicos
>medicos
So they speak Spanish in Australia now?
Sam says
Another isolated instance like thousands of others which should never be connected to the religion of peace.
American says
It’s not hard to understand. Many Muslims are Muslims in Name Only; they don’t take their religion very seriously and may not even be aware of what the Qur’an directs the Muslim to do. However, once they are exposed to true Islam, and understand what their faith requires – if they are at all devout, or invested in their faith, they MUST do as this doctor did and join the cause. It is their duty as Muslims. They may hide their commitment to the faith, just as the Qur’an tells them to until their numbers are sufficient, but when the time comes, they will join in. The only answer is to eliminate Islam. start by ending Muslim immigration to Western nations, then weed them out. This needs to start NOW.
Peggy says
Too late. We’ve missed the boat on that. Too many in our countries now and too many born here so which country is going to have them?
We can start by stopping pandering to them. Revoke laws which make it illegal to say something negative about Islam. Stop Halal compliance and no more Islamic schools getting government assistance.
Start celebrating Christianity in public schools again and never say happy holidays instead of Merry Christmas again. We have to allow Christianity to flourish again and yes allow Jews and others to flourish but Islam must have limits. If this is discrimination then let’s alter our laws so it cannot be discrimination.
Georg says
Maybe if he’d been offered a nice construction job he wouldn’t have taken this path. So funny to see a hypothesis like jobs for jihadis fail so miserably.
When will they admit it?
Proud Pork Fan says
Dr Tareq Kamleh if I may say so, you are a d-bag.
Mirren10 says
Another reason why you should **never** have a muslim doctor, or allow them anywhere near your family.
If I make an appointment at my local medical surgery, and they tell me it’s one of the **three** muslim doctors there, I ask for another doctor. Same goes for the nurses. I wouldn’t trust any of them as far as I could throw a grand piano.
I wonder how many kufr babies/children he neglected, in favour of those of his co-religionists ?
Champ says
I wholly agree, Mirren10! ..great comment 🙂
Mirren10 says
Thanks, Champ and Shirley Anne.
David says
Didn’t isis just kill a bunch of doctors? So much for job security.
Joseph says
Well this is one way to get out of paying off your student loan.
http://pamelageller.com/2015/04/my-islamic-faith-prevents-me-from-paying-interest-on-my-student-loans.html/
I don’t know how the education/college system works in Australia though; so far as paying for higher education.
mortimer says
Muslim missionary doctor of DEATH. Looks like any other Muslim…never speaks about Islam…never interested in jihad before…then POOF! Sudden jihad syndrome ZOMBIE!
Now…ready to kill mercilessly for Allah after attending Islamic study groups or reading books about the INDIVIDUAL DUTY OF JIHAD FOR ALL MUSLIMS.
Now…in love with supremacism, misogyny, religious-based hatred, cruel punishments, dictatorship, arbitrary arrest and summary execution.
Now…irrational, delusional, armed and dangerous!
Do you want to use a MUSLIM doctor? I don’t. You never know what he’s thinking…do you?
Truth Seeker says
There was a Thinking that Westerners are more Wise and Cleverer. But now their action show they are not. Probably many of them went away from God and God doesn’t help them now.
Any man understands, there is nothing called Moderate Muslim. Muslims are in 2 Groups. 1 Open Jihadi; 2. Stealth Jihadi. Both supplement each other. Jihadi is assured of entry into Janaah (Islamic Paradise). Those who do not be part of Jihad will be thrown into Hell Fire.
So long as Westerners don’t realise the Fact, they will get cheated and subjugated.
Daniel Triplett says
Agreed. They’re all Jihadists, and none can be trusted.
duh_swami says
Medical supplies and equipment are very expensive…Who is supplying them? I bet the doctors are not doing much beyond 1st aid…
abad says
The more Muslims who leave Australia for Iraq, the better……and they needn’t both returning down under, either.
Blooming3 says
We have Muslim educators, academics and doctors in the US of immigrant
familiies who promote hate against the West, and whose sole explanation of
Islamism is to blame Zionists. This is often done under the guise of civil
rights and fighting ‘islamophobia’. Here is a board which reveals anonymous
blogs (anti West, anti Israel, anti Jewish) which have prominent American
Muslim lawyers, doctors, educators and educators behind them.
http://bewareamericanislamists.runboard.com/f2
Take Loon Watch whose 2 anonymous moderators ‘Garibaldi’
and ‘Ilisha’ claim to fight hate and ‘islamophobia’. This is done by promoting
anti Zionist, anti West and anti-semitic hate and promoting worldwide
conspiracies of muslim victimisation. Their veteran writer and commenter DrM of
drmaxtor.blogspot.com is notorious anti west, anti hindu anti-semite. Evidence
of Dr Maxtor excusing Jihadism and promoting anti-semitism, anti-western,
anti-hinduism all the while blaming Zionism for all the ills in Islamic
societies can be seen at his own nazi like blog and his commenting history on
Loonwatch https://www.google.co.uk/#newwindow=1&q=site:loonwatch.com+DrM
In one comment he says he wouldn’t treat Zionists. It is
worth investigating how many Americans have died whilst being treated by him
DrM AKA DrMaxtor real name is Dr Rushdi Cader
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/rushdi-cader/6a/a23/175 and he hides his real persona because he wouldn’t be able to teach law
enforcement officers
http://www.swattrauma.com/PRACTI-SEAL/About_Us.html
The police who employed him have no idea of his underground Islamist activities.
Dr Rushdi Cader is a member of the Mosque of Nasreen, San
Luis Obispo
http://mosqueofnasreen.org
He was deported from Israel where he had gone to make trouble http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2002/588/re5.htm
Dr Rushdie Cader AKA Dr Maxtor AKA DrM is the founder of the Umma Clinic in California. http://www.ummaclinic.org which receives public funds. He is a UCLA graduate and he founded this Muslim clinic
http://drmaxtor.blogspot.com/2006/10/ummah-community-clinic.html.
Wikipedia page for Umma Clinic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UMMA_Community_Clinic
He is a Muslim activist well known amongst American
Muslims (urls to Ikhras and Muslim Matters follow)
Muslim Matters speaks glowingly of his anti-semitic ‘Judeofascism’ posts
http://muslimmatters.org/2007/10/21/bigotry-awareness-week/
“Check out Judeofascist Awareness Week at my blog.
… I agree – DrM’s Judeofascist posts are awesome – very enlightening and
right on point”
http://ikhras.com/mona-eltahawy-slightly-improving/
DrM. August 2, 2010 at 10:27 PM. Asalamu Aliakum! Well
said. Glad to … who tried to hijack and misrepresent Islam for their
Judeofascist masters. …
DrM he is careful to hide his hatred of the West preferring to spew his bile anonymously as DrM at his own blog drmaxtor.blogspot.com and since 2007 DrM has been a heavy contributor to Loon Watch and has ceased updating his own blog.
He now posts regularly at Loon Watch. You can see his hate
filled commenting history at Loon Watch by doing a simple google search or by
looking at
DrM does not reveal his real life identity at Loon Watch
or at his blog where he claims to write about medical issues and ‘muslim’
issues. Loon Watch switched to using Disqus. DrM has now made his Disqus
history private http://disqus.com/by/1DrM/
Dr Rushdi Cader and his wife Nisha Cader featured in
Saudi media
https://www.saudiaramcoworld.com/issue/200703/healing.south.central.htm
Umma Clinic Twitter account where he is careful not to
show his true colours like he does at Loon Watch https://twitter.com/ummaclinic
Facebook – UMMA Community Clinic
https://www.facebook.com/pages/UMMA-Community-Clinic/155816815511
DrM has been cited approvingly at many anti-semitic sites
including Stormfront:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t507704
Rumi Cader who is a professor is on the board of the Umma Clinic.
voegelinian says
The Islamic version of “Doctors Without Borders” — Jihad Without Borders.
And what completes the madness is the likelihood that most of the starry-eyed doctors, nurses and other health care practitioners who participate in the neo-Wilsonian White Man’s Burden of the Doctors Without Borders program are Politically Correct Multi-Culturalists who would defend Islam and the multitudes of nice Muslims-Who-Just-Wanna-Have-a-Sandwich (in the immortally moronic words of Ben Affleck) from us evil Islamophobes.
Actually, the precise words of the esteemed Professor of Islam, Emeritus Prof. Ben Affleck were:
“Or how about the more than a billion people, who aren’t fanatical, who don’t punish women, who just wanna go to the store, have some sandwiches, pray five times a day, and don’t say any of the things that you… [inaudible] you’re stereotyping… [inaudible] …and you’re painting the whole group with a broad brush…!”
http://swf.tubechop.com/tubechop.swf?vurl=vln9D81eO60&start=176&end=194&cid=5780681
Peggy says
Here’s one who not only went to Kosovo to help “victims of brutal Serbs” but who also took up arms and killed.
I thought that doctors took an oath not to do any harm. Was I wrong.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/surgeons-act-of-compassion/story-e6frea83-1225863829127
We all know that KLA were on a terrorist list until they became useful to the US and then quickly got taken off.
Now this doctor is still practicing. Isn’t violating the oath a serious matter?
William Lucas Harvey Jr. says
It seems the West is increasingly succumbing to Islam’s “Islamic Caliphate”, “Sharia Law”, and “Blasphemy Laws” (attempted Muslim imposed Penalties on the World for “daring” to expose the TRUTH about Islam), unless the West wakes up to the TRUTH.
Especially in America under it’s apparent “Pro Islam, Pro Muslim”, “Anti America”,”Anti Constitution”, “Anti Christian”, very “Imperial” Leader and his Administration.
ALL well Documented thru the Obama Administration’s OWN Words, Actions, and Deeds.
Oliver says
Can we send more Muslims over? i don’t care what their profession. Just send them. And hopefully, all will get killed, the quicker the better.
KrazyKafir says
I’m confused, his original name is Tareq Kamleh, and now he is going by, Abu Yusuf, both names sound Islamic why the name change?
Bronson says
Maybe it is because Abu Yusuf is Arabic, hence genuine esp allowing him to leave behind his probably Bosnian / Albania background and womanising past.
KrazyKafir says
Thanks, Bronson.
Daniel Triplett says
@PRODOS
“But how do you ‘ban Islam?'”
We have plenty of just cause. Islam is Sedition & Conspiracy to Murder. It’s not a religion we must tolerate. It’s a crime we must eradicate.
How?
For starters, we must learn how to cooperate and ally with Russia and China during WWIII, which is right at our doorstep. This takes American leadership, which we don’t have at the moment.
Muslims who want to exterminate us have no business controlling 2/3 of the World’s oil. Not only do the Russians and Chinese also hate Muslims, but if they have a shared stake in all the spoils of war oil when the dust settles, they’ll be even more persuaded to get on board with the program.
WWIII is already in progress. It’s going to get ugly when aggressive Muslims start glassing infidel cities with nukes as they’ve promised. We need to face the facts here, and realize we’re facing a massive World war of Biblical proportions. It’s long past time for us to capitalize on the nuclear weapon advantage we have over the Muslims. This advantage will be short-lived.
Some Intel analysts believe Iran already has at least one bomb, but they’re waiting to stockpile dozens of them, along with perfecting their ICBM technology before unleashing Armageddon. But it’s coming, have no doubt. If you don’t believe me, just ask them.
Whose side do we want the Russians and Chinese to take in the Armageddon? Antagonizing Putin isn’t helping matters. He’s not a great guy. We all know that, but Stalin was much worse. Sometimes we need to ally with such peoples in order to destroy evil.
It’s time to extinguish the Islamic ideology from Earth forever. It will only get worse with our inaction. Shame on us if we pass this mess on to our children. This is our fight, and our responsibility, not our children’s. Future generations will have their own evils to confront.
If it’s not Iran, it will be some other Muslim group down the road who figures out how to build, buy, or steal the nukes. Islam is the problem. ALL Islam.
We have neither the gold nor military to invade and occupy every Muslim sovereignty, but we can force every Muslim society on Earth to criminalize Islam.
We need a different mindset than the current prevailing public opinion. We must think like our grandfathers did when confronting Japan and Nazi Germany. Unconditional surrender of Islam is the objective. Unrelenting death and destruction is the means.
Just look at Battle Damage Assessment photos of German and Japanese cities to see how our grandfathers felt about avoiding “collateral damage and death to civilian women, children, and elderly.” In fact, these people were intentionally targeted, necessarily. We wouldn’t have won the war if we didn’t. We’d best develop the stomach and will to do the same.
The Japanese High Command, along with Japanese and German survivors all said the unrelenting destruction of their cities was the number one thing that broke their will to fight and made them surrender.
As Gen Curtis Lemay said, architect of the Strategic Area Bombing campaign, “If you kill enough of them, they stop fighting.”
LeMay also said, “There are no innocent civilians. It is their government and you are fighting a people, you are not trying to fight an armed force anymore. So it doesn’t bother me so much to be killing the so-called innocent bystanders.”
And here’s one more from LeMay, our longest serving 4-Star in history:
“I think there are many times when it would be most efficient to use nuclear weapons. However, the public opinion in this country and throughout the world throw up their hands in horror when you mention nuclear weapons, just because of the propaganda that’s been fed to them.
As far as casualties were concerned I think there were more casualties in the first attack on Tokyo with incendiaries than there were with the first use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. The fact that it’s done instantaneously, maybe that’s more humane than incendiary attacks, if you can call any war act humane. I don’t, particularly, so to me there wasn’t much difference. A weapon is a weapon and it really doesn’t make much difference how you kill a man. If you have to kill him, well, that’s the evil to start with and how you do it becomes pretty secondary. I think your choice should be which weapon is the most efficient and most likely to get the whole mess over with as early as possible.”
This is longstanding US strategy we’ve even used on our own people. Gen William T. Sherman: “War is cruelty. There is no use trying to reform it. The crueler it is, the sooner it will be over.”
The USAF taught all of us at Officer Training School the definition of Victory in War is when “The enemy loses the will to fight.” That’s how you know we’ve won. So how are we doing with that?
How will we break 1.6 Billion Muslims’ will to fight?
Droning a few Muslim combatants sitting around a card-table, or driving down the road in a Toyota truck, one strike at a time is not going to win the war against Islam. Let’s face it.
Without risking one Allied soldier’s or pilot’s lives, we could criminalize Islam worldwide inside of two weeks, for less than $7 Billion.
Using LeMay’s successful strategy of Incremental Random Strategic Area Bombing is the ONLY solution I see.
Incremental (3 days between strikes), to give the enemy time to re-think their loyalties to a fictitious deity and medieval madman. And Random, such that no one knows where to hide, convincing every Muslim on the planet he could be next. The civilian pressure upon their Muslim governments to comply with Allied terms would be enormous.
On Day One of the operation, using stand-off nuclear MRV ICBMs, we target all Iranian nuke production facilities, as well as the Pakistani nuke arsenal. Targeting hardware first, and threatening population centers later. Then they’d know we’re serious about this, regenerating fear and respect for America instantly. And with today’s social media and rapid information transfer, perhaps we could scare the demons out of them real quick, and force their surrender without inflicting too many enemy casualties. We could even broadcast a 48 hour warning to the target city, giving them an opportunity to evacuate civilians. The fear and refugee crises inflicted upon these regions would be unprecedented, and highly persuasive in forcing surrender. Governments criminalizing Islam would be spared from targeting.
Although none of us enjoys killing other human beings, this will be necessary, on a large scale, if we intend to win this conflict. Our grandparents had to do it, and so will we. The objective here is not to exterminate Muslims, but rather to exterminate the Islamic ideology. But the unpleasant fact is we need to kill a lot of Muslims to do that. Not all of them; just enough to force the surrender of their ideology, making the practice or promotion of Islam a capital offense worldwide, including within our own borders.
Similar to WWII: The problem wasn’t so much the Germans, as it was Nazism. Once we extinguished the Nazi ideology, the World could then live in peace with the Germans.
The Muslims are spending all their time and money figuring out how to kill every one of us, and they’re just moments away from having the ability to kill millions of us on a horrific scale.
We must take preemptive action now. The preventable consequences of inaction will be staggering.
voegelinian says
As seems to be usual whenever there is robustly tough talk about a war on Islam, from the Counter-Jihad Tough Guys (Drekken, Justin, Avenger, Triplett, et al.) nothing is said about the millions of Muslims already in the West and what to do about them; nor any realistic appraisal of the current situation that represents an obvious temporal, cultural and psychological.distance & resistance from here (the present) to there (their prescriptive vision of the future). Perhaps in their minds they can just hit the fast-forward on their remote control for the video game…
Daniel Triplett says
I’m a 20 year US Military Officer Sir, not some punk who just pulled this stuff out of my ass.
Where do you think I learned these strategies, from a “video game?”
I learned these strategies in our military, as did every other US Field Grade Military Officer. And our military developed these strategies from centuries of analysis and hard-fought war experience.
I’ve also had the pleasure of spending six years on the other side of the planet, defending your Constitution, while getting shot at on a regular basis by the same enemy we’re discussing. So I’ve had a whole lot of time to think about all this.
And I did address what we do about Muslims already in the West. Islam is Sedition and Conspiracy to Murder. Those are already crimes in every jurisdiction on the globe, particularly in the West. All that’s necessary is an honest and long-overdue reclassification of Islam from “the religion of peace,” into the criminal enterprise it is. Then enforce the laws already on the books against it. Promoting Islam should be a capital offense. All mosques should be razed, or converted into Churches and Synagogues.
I’ve described from my military point of view, the ONLY viable solution I see. I’ve heard no alternatives from you or anyone else. If you have a different Counter-Jihad strategy that offers a rapid and permanent solution to the crisis confronting us, I’d sure like to hear it.
American says
Daniel Triplett – Thank you for your service. I agree with you. It will – it must – come down to that. Unfortunately, it will take more atrocities, here at home, before the nation will wake up to that. It will also take a different administration.
Peggy says
I totally agree with you. We can’t deport the ones already here nor can we stop them from breeding but we can limit them.
Once they see that we are not going to enable them they will have to stop. No matter how hard they cry racism we are not going to listen.
Once they see that we have destroyed their former homes they will know we are serious and they WILL stop because they are basically cowards.
voegelinian says
I’m a 20 year US Military Officer Sir, not some punk who just pulled this stuff out of my ass.
Unfortunately, long and esteemed service in the U.S. Military is no guarantee that an individual is not going to be impaired by various aspects of the PC MC paradigm.
For example, we have General George W. Casey, Jr. who, when he was serving as the 36th Chief of Staff of the entire U.S. Military, all four branches, in the wake of the Fort Hood carnage in 2009, with 14 dead (including the unborn child of Pvt. Francheska Velez, 21, who had just returned from Iraq — a moment of silence, please…).
All right, now back to the silver-haired buffoon with fruit salad on his chest, General George W. Casey, who even with all his years of experience and distinguished service to the U.S. Military, could say that our society protecting “diversity” is more important than preventing massacres of Americans on American soil:
“What happened at Fort Hood was a tragedy, but it would be an even greater tragedy, if our diversity becomes a casualty here.”
http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2009/11/08/general-casey-diversity-shouldnt-be-casualty-of-fort-hood/
And then there are those other two Generals, McChrystal and Petraeus, whose abject, abysmal idiocy in their COIN policy that has been endangering my life, the lives of my loved ones, and the lives of my fellow citizens — ably diagnosed and analyzed by Diana West. For example, one instance out of literally scores of reports and essays Ms. West has penned over the years on this protracted, sprawling travesty overseen and directed by more distinguished brass than all the marching bands in all the high schools have ever had:
(Scroll down to the “Diana West writes” parts):
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/014348.html#sept26
I’m sorry, but one of the many unique things that characterizes this strange new war we are in, this asymmetrical third world war is that the ordinary civilian trumps the experienced military because the former can see what’s plain as the nose in front of our face.
voegelinian says
And if someone is going to try to defend these esteemed Generals on the grounds that they were only “following orders” of their Commander-in-Chief, that’s not good enough; that’s precisely why we are civilians — so that we can judge these clowns for the clowns they are. They are not doing their main jobs — protecting our lives. They are in fact doing the precise opposite. Funny that the same JW Tough Guys who are so quick to gallop off on the horse of Revolution, would apparently shrink back from counseling Mutiny.
Daniel Triplett says
@voegelinian
“Unfortunately, long and esteemed service in the U.S. Military is no guarantee that an individual is not going to be impaired by various aspects of the PC MC paradigm.”
All your examples of PC MC political ass kissing are of 4-Star Generals. All 4-Stars in today’s military are handpicked by the President. That’s why you see so much PC MC political agreement and ass-kissing of the POTUS by some officers of that rank.
I’m not a General. So what’s your point? Have I said anything PC MC anytime ever on this website or any other? Have I said anything to you that would suggest you’re not hearing a sincere and accurate description of my perspective?
voegelinian:
“I’m sorry, but one of the many unique things that characterizes this strange new war we are in, this asymmetrical third world war is that the ordinary civilian trumps the experienced military because the former can see what’s plain as the nose in front of our face.”
Wow. OK, got it. Our military veterans, with all their years of professional training and combat experience should not be trusted, because we/they know nothing about fighting this asymmetrical third World War. Because of course the military only knows how to train for and fight symmetric wars, right?
And instead, America should be getting all tactical and strategic war fighting advice from you, because unlike me and the rest of the military, any ordinary citizen, but especially you, can see what’s plain as the nose in front of your face.
What a relief to know Americans’ prayers have been answered, and we’ve now found a true military genius, whose never worn his country’s uniform, yet is an expert in all military and national security concerns.
So please tell us Sir, what should we do about Islam? What should American policy be for victory in the Counter-Jihad? None of us dumbshit military PC MC ass-kisser war veterans have any idea what to do.
For the love of God, please don’t keep all that expertise a secret. What’s your plan?
voegelinian says
When I say that a civilian trumps experienced military, I mean that the mere fact of being experienced military should not be enough. A person who has never been in the military could be more savvy about the problem of Islam than an experienced military; meanwhile, a person could have had years of experience in Afghanistan and Iraq and still be beholden to various PC MC reflexes. Thus, it’s not military experience per se that is relevant here; it is the graduation on the learning curve of Islam.
Secondly, I was not directly faulting Triplett for being overtly PC MC; but I have noticed that some of the more robustly anti-Islam individuals in Jihad Watch seem to be unexpectedly soft on Deportation and also have shown signs of believing in the trustworthy Muslim they have met personally.
Daniel Triplett says
Listen Brother, I’ve reading and enjoying your posts for years now, and agree with you most all the time. We’re on the same side, for Christ’s Sake, so let’s try to keep it that way, and avoid the pissing match inside the tent.
I’m not here to pretend all military officers are god-like and should be the exclusive source of all things Counter-Jihad. Like you, I and many of my fellow vets have also been disgusted by some of the crap coming out of the mouths of 4-Stars today. In fact, most of the 4-Stars do disappoint me, to be candid. There are a few though who get tough with Islam, and tell it like it is. Those guys often fall on their swords though and lose their jobs, which just reinforces to the rest of them that they’d better tow the PC MC line, or else.
Sadly, we just don’t have any Generals like Sherman, Pershing, LeMay, MacArthur, or Patton anymore: Guys with the balls to exterminate millions and tell the President exactly what he needs to hear.
But in the Field Grade, and especially the Company Grade Officer Ranks, promotion is not political, and as long as we’re not a complete doofus, we get promoted, so political ass-kissing isn’t so much a problem. You’re likely to get a straight non-PC MC perspective from those guys, such as me. And since I’ve now separated from the USAF, and am a 747 pilot with UPS Airlines, you’re really going to get a straight and honest military perspective from me, since I no longer need to worry about getting in trouble from the President by publicly speaking the pure, non-PC, unedited military perspective.
Although I have great respect for our military, and always will, I’ve also known some disgraceful tools who were Officers. About 5 – 10% of the pilots in my squadron during the war were malingering cowards who would come up with any excuse they could to avoid the combat missions. They’d pretend they were sick, or suck up to the scheduler to get the stateside only missions. I even had some copilots who begged me to fake a mechanical problem with the airplane so we could deviate to a maintenance base where there was no shooting going on. They were such an embarrassing disgrace.
And a lot of those guys are the ass-kissing types too who really want to be in command. I’ve noticed that military officers who badly want to be in command, probably shouldn’t be the ones in command. Kind of like cops. The guys that really want to be cops are the kind of guys that shouldn’t be cops. And many of these military officers spend their careers jamming their noses up all the right asses, and some of those guys become the 4-stars we all see with the disgraceful attitudes you described earlier.
I also don’t want to imply that military vets are the only experts on the Islamic threat or Counter-Jihad. Nor am I suggesting that civilian expertise has no place in military strategy or war planning.
Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller are two excellent examples of civilians with no military background who’ve exposed the truth about Islam like no one in military Intel ever has to me. Their contributions to the Counter-Jihad have been indispensable to America and our military. As a military officer, I’ve been following and learning from these two for many years, and I know hundreds of other vets who do the same.
There are other great examples of civilian insights and contributions also. Many of the regular civilian contributors in the comments section of JW have also spread their influence in the good fight, including you. And military vets like me and others who follow Robert and Pamela, and regularly read the comments of JW are learning from those insights, and those insights are incorporated into our own thinking. We use the education and insights we learn from civilians, and combine that with the military training, expertise, and classified Intel that only we could know, to together develop strategies that will defeat America’s foe.
It’s a team effort. Both the military and the well-studied students and experts of Islam and Counter-Jihad will always both be required to learn from, work with, and support each other if we want to win the War against Islam.
Stay strong Brother. We have a big fight ahead of us.
voegelinian says
Thanks for taking the time to explain your point of view. I wasn’t saying I think you’re not on the same side as me. I simply point out what I think are deficiencies wherever I see them. At this point, in terms of current comments, the only ones I can see that remain are the two I pointed out originally here, a couple of days ago:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/04/australia-muslim-doctor-joins-islamic-state-medical-team-for-jihad-for-islam-against-the-west/comment-page-1#comment-1228476
Daniel Triplett says
I appreciate your kind words American (you have the best username on this site). America is a country worth fighting for, and freedom is a cause worth dying for. Serving America has been the greatest privilege of my life.
I’m afraid you’re right: Americans will choose to suffer much more pain and bloodshed before cooperating to decisively end Islam once and for all.
Stay strong.
Jay Airahs says
Dan,
Maybe I am missing something but I would not put you in the same category as Drekken, and Justin as voeg suggested.
I agree that antagonizing Putin isn’t helping matters. Let Putin defend Russia from Muslims near Ukraine. In fact let Putin have Ukraine and boot Turkey out of NATO too.
The folks at NPR would strongly disagree which is proof that this is the best approach to succeed.
Daniel Triplett says
Thanks Jay, I appreciate that Man.
profitsbeard says
Islam is the illness.
And the prescription is iron and fire.
tahliae says
Well said Daniel Triplett.
Society is not yet at a point that they can ‘tolerate’ what needs to be done. I’ve said it many times before but in Australia’s case it’s been too long since we have had the threat of invasion/attack on us. Very little of the current leftist, PC, do-gooder, bend over attitudes were around in the decades following WW2.
Would America today tolerate numbers of its son’s it lost on the first day of Iwo Jima? Would Australian’s do the same with the losses of it’s sons at Gallipoli?
Our soldiers are hamstrung by the same bureaucracy and PC rhetoric, unworkable rules of engagement and the lack of spine from those in positions of power to deal effectively with the enemy.
Things are going to get a lot, lot worse before any solution is forthcoming!
Daniel Triplett says
I think you’re right tahliae, and share your belief that society isn’t ready today to do what really needs to be done to destroy Islam.
But if Americans today watched and felt the heartbreak of 26,000 casualties in 36 days at Iwo Jima, or 62,000 casualties in 82 days at Okinawa, perhaps their attitude would change. Maybe then their empathy would drop to zero for enemy civilian casualties. Then the efficiency of nuclear ordnance and the quick victory it yields may look mighty attractive.
Agreed, things will get a whole lot worse before they get better.
Iran is certain to obtain and use nuke weapons at a time of their choosing. And with their ICBMs, this may just happen right here in America, and soon. Although they don’t really need the ICBMs with Islamic Republic of Iran painted on the side of them. All they really need to do is put the warhead in a crate on a New York bound container ship, or have one of their proxy goon squads truck it to a city center.
Civilian attitudes about offensive nukes will likely then change in a heartbeat.
In the mean time, I’m just trying to do my small part for the good fight by talking out loud about these things as much, and in as many different venues I can. I’ve noticed not too many people are willing to speak out loud about what really needs to happen here, like every family in the early 1940s frequently did, and without reservation.
Just trying to persuade people, one mind at a time, and get people talking and thinking about a solution.
bullfrogger says
I’m with you Daniel .But with the liberals , press ,and government conspiring to paint Islam as peaceful and without One true patriotic statesman on the conservative side , from where will all of this emanate? I can’t get a liberal to even hear that Islam isn’t peaceful let alone tell one that we need to blow them all up .
Daniel Triplett says
I hear you Brother. Those Liberals are a stubborn and frustrating bunch, refusing to acknowledge facts, and completely devoid of reason. Their narcissistic arrogance prevents them from persuasion by the rest of us lesser know-nothing fools.
My only sibling is one of them. He even volunteered at the John Kerry campaign headquarters in DC. Then he danced around in the National Mall with his liberal buddies, carrying signs protesting the war, at the same time I and 500,000 other American brothers were over there getting shot at by the same enemy he was encouraging, letting them see the real way to defeat the US Military is to turn the American public and political opinion against the Mission. Our enemies aren’t stupid, and are well-read students of American history. They know how to win. And they did. Look what happened when the Lib hero Obama pulled us out of Iraq (a war we had already won). And now the Left is giddy we’re all going to repeat the same mistake in Afghanistan. They just don’t get it, and never will.
Oh my God, my brother and I have been in some vicious arguments over the years. And now he’s Obama’s Chief Water Carrier, voting for him twice, with nothing critical at all to say about the man. He even talked my naïve mother into voting for the Muslim fool the first time. I pulled her out of the darkness for the second election thank goodness.
I don’t know how much of a difference Jason thinks he personally made with American Foreign Policy due to his wartime foolishness, but he did manage to create a gigantic rift with his only brother. We seldom speak anymore.
So yes, I know exactly what you mean. Americans are our own worst enemy. And the near-majority of leftist fools we have now is frightening. I’m sure one of Obama’s last self-destructive acts will be Executive Order Amnesty for the 12 million illegals, with full voting rights of course. Then we’ll never see a Republican POTUS again.
I think Boehner and Company are delusional if they think they can suck up to the Hispanics and beat Obama to the punch by granting Amnesty with “Immigration Reform,” hoping to score Republican credit. All statistics show that’s just not going to happen. 80% of the illegals will vote Democrat, no matter who gives them the right to vote.
I’m just praying Ted Cruz gets elected. He has the Cuban background, so hopefully he can bring a few Hispanics into the tent, at least, and get the American destiny back on track. He’s a solid leader and would make a good CINC. He does understand the threat, and he’s very persuasive. Maybe when he’s POTUS, sitting behind the desk in the Oval Office, with the full might of US Intelligence and Military advice at his fingertips, and with the big picture perspective only the President can really see, then he can convince America to come together in support of the Mission we need to defeat our foe.
sidney penny says
A doctor? But…but…poverty causes terrorism! And a “jihad for Islam” in the Islamic State? But…but…the Islamic State has nothing to do with Islam!
Robert
You missed out medical doctor
and you also missed out the third but
But…but…but….the Islamic State has nothing to do with Islam!
and you missed out the last sentence.
and President Obama and Prime Minister David Cameron have assured us that the Islamic State has nothing to do with Islam.
Can some one please send this video to these two persons.
Robert,that is his jihad,what is yours?
voegelinian says
Wow, the comments in this thread indicate that the Moderate Muslim meme (under other labels) is quite alive and well in the Counter-Jihad. How dismaying.
Demsci says
For clarity’s sake, Voegelinian, I wish to make another distinction.
I too have had it and hate the term “moderate Muslim”. to me it is a description of a Muslim that is ” tepid”, disinterested, ignorant, in Islam for vague and WRONG reasons only, namely “loyalty to family, community”, vague fear of hell, fear of deathpenalty, or shunning etc.
The moderate Muslims are well nigh “worthless” for us, and yes, a big potential threat.
So how about the ZEALOUS Muslims? Which I juxtapose against the Moderates.
Can there be ZEALOUS DEMOCRATIC MUSLIMS, like mayor Aboutaleb claims that he is. And he is believed by his socialist party.
Don’t bother, I know your answer already, I only wrote for some distinction and clarification.
voegelinian says
I don’t think you quite grasp my point. My point is that any taxonomy that erects a category of a harmless Muslim is flawed. Harmless Muslims may indeed exist out there, somewhere; but unfortunately, we do not have adequate means to vet them on a macro scale sufficiently for our #1 priority — the safety of our societies and citizens.
That means that pragmatically speaking, we must adopt a rational prejudice against all Muslims.
Thus, the only taxonomic breakdown of Muslims that reflects our horrible quandary as a global revival of Islamic Jihad metastasizes and spirals out of (our) control, is the following:
All 1.5 billion Muslims may be divided up into two categories:
1. Muslims who are killing us.
2. Muslims who are lying about the killing.
We may further break down each of the two, to wit:
1a, Muslims who are plotting to kill us.
1b. Muslims who are materially enabling 1 and 1a.
1c. Muslims who have shown, in words and in deeds, to support 1, 1a and 1b.
2a. Islam apologists who go out of their way to propagandize in various media.
2b. Muslims who may not be that active in propaganda, but who respond to comments and questions about Islam with the typical talking points used by 2a.
2c. Muslims who seem nice and friendly, or just unremarkably ordinary (“just wanna have a sandwich”) who haven’t uttered or written any propaganda memes only because they haven’t been prompted to (and so the gullible Westerner assumes they must be harmless).
And that special category that seems to have been a recent addition in the last couple of years:
2d. Muslims who pretend to be concerned and aghast at the extremism and violence roiling out of the Muslim world — such as Maajid Nawaz, Zuhdi Jasser, and that fella who tried to sneak into Jihad Watch under the wire this past week, Zakaria Fellah — Muslims who “feel our pain” yet, when push comes to shove, end up retailing the same memes, just with a new glib spin on them to try to fool us in the Counter-Jihad (and often, unfortunately, they get away with it). These are the “Better Cops” who have come along precisely because they realize that the standard-issue garden-variety “Good Cops” can no longer work among those in the Counter-Jihad who have wised up. Unfortunately, as I say, many in the Counter-Jihad who have built up rational resistance to the “Good Cops” remain vulnerable to the soothing wiles, the sweet taqiyya in their ears, from these “Better Cops”.
I would hope the reader notes that all this fine-tuned breakdown does not appreciably detract from, nor soften in any way, the starkly sober and bleakly gritty realism of the primary breakdown of 1 and 2.
Demsci says
And I Voegelinian, am apprehensive for your reaction, but now dare to say: “We ARE Dem-Loy’s!!! Democracy-Loyalists. And among us, the percentage of ZEALOUS Dem-loy’s is even LOWER than the percentage of zealous Muslims under Muslims.
We have a vast majority of “moderate, tepid, disinterested, ignorant, PCMC, traitorous etc. “Dem-Loy’s. Who are worthless or even a burden on us.
And on top of that, among the Western Citizens, there are also the countless, in-effect-nihilist’s.
Now, if this is so, what new world do we want to forge? With what citizens in it?
mezcukor says
I do not trust any Muslim. When I go to the hospital I warn them that if a Muslim doctor touches me I will sue the hospital.
Truth Seeker says
Australia is marching forward to transform into Austrabia
ninetyninepct says
I am confused – muzzies want to die to get their virgins yet they want doctors to keep them alive. Typical muzzy bullshit taquiya.
voegelinian says
Well, some of them have to be repaired to be able to go back out and kill some more.
ninetyninepct says
CAIR and other muzzy radicals had better think twice. The next 9/11 style attack will mean the instant start of a muslim cleansing and CAIR will be among the first. This will be quickly followed by burka’s, hijabs and mosques. If you are a muzzy you will be targeted. Better the existing muzzies stop the crap that is happening now rather than later when it will be simply too late to say sorry. Violence is the language of islam and that is the language that will be clearly spoken.
sheik yer'mami says
He wasn’t “mild-mannered” at all:
DOC TAREQ KAMLEH A SEXUALLY MANIPULATIVE “FRAUD”, A “SLEAZEBALL” AND A “CREEP”
http://sheikyermami.com/2015/04/doc-tareq-kamleh-a-sexually-manipulative-fraud-a-sleazeball-and-a-creep/
Bronson says
Latest news in Australian media is that people who worked with this person report that he was fraud, sleazeball and a creep, e.g. at http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/young-aussie-isis-doctor-was-a-manipulative-sleaze-and-creep/story-fni0xqrc-1227322478122.
In other words your typical Muslim who finds religion and then goes from one extreme to the other.