• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Gawker laments AFDI’s legal victories for the freedom of speech

Apr 27, 2015 8:49 pm By Robert Spencer

david-yerushalmi-pamela-geller74This article actually provides a helpful overview of the many freedom of speech victories we have won in U.S. courts, rolling back unconstitutional restrictions on speech and attempts to restrict the freedom of speech only to the anti-Israel, pro-jihad Left. But Hannah Block-Wehba is crestfallen by these victories, not recognizing that a victory for the freedom of speech is a victory for everyone all across the political spectrum; instead, she laments that “a downright weird amount of First Amendment litigation is being brought by an organization that fights only for the right to say disparaging things about Muslims.”

Why exposing uncomfortable and unwelcome truths about the jihad threat is “to say disparaging things about Muslims” rather than “to expose the elements of Islamic theology that jihadis use to justify violence and supremacism” and “to challenge Muslims of good will to affect genuine reform,” she does not explain.

More below.

“How New York City Buses Are Becoming Vehicles for Hateful Speech,” by Hannah Bloch-Wehba, Gawker, April 27, 2015:

Last week, the federal courts chalked up another victory for the defense of American freedom—or, rather, for the American Freedom Defense Initiative. Judge John Koeltl of the Southern District of New York ruled that the MTA must display an advertisement known as “the ‘Killing Jews’ advertisement.”

“Killing Jews” (the court’s abbreviation, not mine) is a response to an ad campaign run by the Council on American-Islamic Relations about the concept of “lesser jihad.” As part of its #MyJihad ad campaign to “take back Islam from Muslim and anti-Muslim Extremists Alike,” that group ran a series of ads attempting to promote tolerance and understanding of the concept of “jihad,” or “struggle.” In response, the American Freedom Defense Initiative developed a series of ads with quotes from Islamic extremists, including the one from “Hamas MTV” at issue in the most recent case: “Killing Jews is Worship that draws us close to Allah.” MTA refused to run the ad, and the group sued.

At least Bloch-Wehba acknowledges that the quote is genuine, while other mainstream media reports have assumed, or disingenuously claimed, that it was a “parody.” But she does so off-handedly and in passing, noting that the series of which this one is part feature “quotes from Islamic extremists.” She never stops to ponder the implications of that fact, or to consider the possibility that to shed light on such statements might not be intending to disparage Muslims or anyone, but to increase people’s general awareness of the nature and magnitude of the threat we face.

The “Killing Jews” case is the latest result of a flurry of litigation activity from the American Freedom Defense Initiative, a nonprofit organization “dedicated to freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and individual rights under the law.” Judging by its lively federal court docket, the organization takes its responsibility to exercise its free speech rights very seriously: this is its third suit against the MTA and its ninth against a transit authority.

In practice, the group—which is run by Pamela Geller, a right-wing activist—is largely devoted to creating incendiary ads for display on public transportation, then litigating when transit authorities shy away from accepting the ads. “Killing Jews” thus joins the pantheon of offensive advertising that the group has placed on public transit around the country, teaching everybody an important lesson about the First Amendment and causing innocent commuters’ eyes to bleed. Beyond their utility at getting travelers from point A to point B, Geller has noted that “[Buses] are a very effective form of advertising,” adding, “I like the bus purely as a marketing vehicle.”

“Incendiary”…”offensive”…”causing innocent commuters’ eyes to bleed.” According to whom? Hannah Bloch-Wehba, and those in power. But the charges, for all the bleating repetition with which they’re made, remain unproven. Only one perspective is allowed in Gawker and the mainstream media in general, but that doesn’t make it any more true.

…This is the organization’s third victory against the MTA. The first was a bit anticlimactic: in 2010, it bought space for its “Original Ground Zero Mosque Bus Advertisement” from the MTA. This ad “has at one side a picture of the Twin Towers aflame with a plane headed toward them. On the opposite side of the banner is a tower with a crescent moon and star. The text between the two buildings is: ‘Why There?’” MTA’s ad agent, CBS Outdoor, rejected the ad. After the Initiative sued, MTA backed down, ran the ad, and the group dismissed its lawsuit.

In 2011, it came back to MTA with its “Savages” ad. The ad read: “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. / Support Israel / Defeat Jihad.” The MTA again rejected the ad, this time on the basis that it was “demeaning,” and the group again sued. (It’s worth noting that until this episode, the MTA had a lackadaisical approach to advertisers: it had never before rejected an ad as demeaning, which explains why the letter from Isabel to Dr. Zizmor continues to run, year after year.) The court applied the most exacting level of First Amendment scrutiny—“strict in theory, fatal in fact”—to hold that MTA’s bar on “demeaning” speech violated the First Amendment. Another win for freedom!

To whom was this ad demeaning? Leftists and Islamic supremacists claimed it was demeaning to all Muslims, but that was only true if every Muslim supported the savage jihad against Israel — the murder of civilians, the passing-out of candy to celebrate those murders, etc. We made this point again and again at the time, but it was always brushed aside, as it didn’t fit the mainstream media narrative.

Though known for its libertine ways, the MTA is by no means the only transportation authority in the country that’s been saddled with these ads. The group also successfully sued the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority in 2012 for the right to run the “Savages” ad. And in March of this year, it prevailed against the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority in federal court in Philadelphia, winning the right to run another, separate, advertisement displaying a picture of Hitler meeting Haj Amin al-Husseini and advocating an end to U.S. aid to “Islamic countries.”

Why does Hannah Bloch-Wehba put “Islamic countries” in sneer quotes, as if there really aren’t any such things? Has she never heard of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan? The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan? Does she think the Kingdom of the Two Holy Places refers to the Westminster Abbey and St. Paul’s Cathedral?

…Also, a downright weird amount of First Amendment litigation is being brought by an organization that fights only for the right to say disparaging things about Muslims. So there you go.

No, what is downright weird is that Bloch-Wehba and her colleagues believe that telling unwelcome and unpopular truths disparages anyone.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: American Freedom Defense Initiative, Featured, free speech, journalistic bias Tagged With: Gawker


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. William Lucas Harvey Jr. says

    Apr 27, 2015 at 9:51 pm

    “Gawker laments AFDI’s legal victories for the freedom of speech” – too bad Gawker.

    Apparently a seemingly Pro Islam, Pro Muslim Gawker evidently “Laments” the victories over not being able to establish Islam’s “Blasphemy Laws”, and not being able to FORCIBLY, under penalty of Law, restrict people from exposing the TRUTH about Islam, and Muslims, and NOT really freedom of speech.

    Crying and Whining we are the “Religion of Peace”, as well as “Racist”, “Bigoted” and “Islamophobe”, to anyone who exposes the TRUTH about Islam – this “Grand Deception” NO longer works for Islam, as in the very appropriate words of BNI, “It Isn’t Islamophobia When they really ARE trying to kill you”.

    Islam – which itself feels that IT has the “Allah, Mohammed, and Qur’an given DUTY” to “Blaspheme”, and make “Racist” and “Bigotred” statements about ANY Religion, Faith, Belief, or Prophet that is NOT Islamic, with expected Impunity, while ITSELF demanding FORCED World “Blasphemy Laws”, with Criminal Punishment, for ANYONE who “Blasphemes” Islam or their Prophet Mohammed.

    Islam – which wants FORCED Islamic Law WORLD WIDE, first if possible through the “Grand Deception” Taqyyia and Kitman (Islamic approved Lying and Deception) that advance the cause Islam by gaining the trust of non-believers (the Infidels), in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them), HOWEVER if NOT possible, THEN through FORCED Islamic Jihad.

    Islam – which considers Islamic Law as “Supreme” (which IS Antithetical to the U.S. Constitution), even over the United states Constitution – which IS America’s “Law of the Land”.

    Islam – which considers THEIR “Holy Book” the Qur’an as “Supreme”, THEIR Allah the ONLY “God”, and THEIR Mohammed the ONLY “Prophet”, and REFUSES to abide by the Laws of ANY Country.
    During the Nazi Days of WW2, the Nazis attempted to hide their Atrocities, and claim that the reports are only “Propaganda” and it isn’t really happening.

    However NOW in the 21st Century Islam’s Islamist “Islamo Nazi’s” BOAST about their Atrocities, and OPENLY Post the Pictures, therefore it IS well DOCUMENTED throughout the World.

    Therefor Islam’s Islamists, and Groups such as CAIR, ISNA, ICNA, MSA, et. al., can no longer adequately refute the direct EVIDENCE and claim that it doesn’t occur (unless they want to try to laughingly claim “Foolish INFIDEL – Just DON’T believe your Lying Eyes and Lying Ears”), even though the Islamist Jihadist’s still incessantly try, and play the “Victim Card” for themselves.

    Also, by attempting to pass the buck by Blaming Christians for performing such acts during the 7th Century Crusades against Muslims, who WERE ALSO performing those acts to the Christians, BUT Christians who btw have NOT for Centuries and do NOT perform such acts TODAY in the 21st Century, while Muslins STILL DO perform such acts TODAY in the 21st Century, and now OPENLY BOAST about it.

    Thanks to News Services, which POST the TRUTH and the EVIDENCE for the World to see (which the Islamic Jihadists are Feverously and Vigorously attempting to Defame and Shut Down), such as “Jihad Watch”, “Creeping Sharia”, “BNI – Bare Naked Islam”, “WND – World Press – World Net Daily”, “Front Page Magazine”, “Muslim Watch”, “The Muslim Issue”, “Pamela Geller Atlas Shrugs”, “Anti CAIR”, “American Freedom Defense Initiative”, “Freedom is Just Another Word, – et. al.

    • Saleem Smith says

      Apr 28, 2015 at 12:37 am

      We ex-Muslims know that Islamic Jew hatred is endemic to Islamic theology.

      According to Islamic legend, Muhammad the evil prophet of Islam was instructed by his god Allah to kill and enslave the Jews of Media that would not accept him as the final prophet and obey and follow his example.

      Qur’an, 33:21
      There is a good example in God’s apostle for those of you who look to God and the Last Day and remember God always.

      The Sira is a record of the life (a biography) of the Islamic prophet. Due to the fact that Islamic apologists are now attempting to whitewash the life of Muhammad, it is best to read the original biographies. Ibn Ishaq’s (d. 773 AD) The Life of Muhammed, translated by Professor Alfred Guillaume has historically been considered the authoritative version of Muhammad’s life story.

      One of Muhammad’s worst crimes, which set a tragic precedent, was his slaughter of the Jewish tribe of Banu Quraiza. The Banu Quraiza were the last of the three Jewish tribes living in and around Yathrib that Muhammad and his followers massacred when Muhammad had finally achieved the power and control that he had long sought. Through Muhammad’s trademark deceit, he instigated a war between the Muslims and the Jewish tribe of Banu Quraiza. Once he had savagely defeated them, Muhammad ordered all of the males who had reached the age of maturity (grown pubic hair) to be killed. Trenches were dug, the men were beheaded, their bodies were thrown in the trench and the trench was covered over with dirt. The women and children were enslaved and the wealth of Banu Quraiza was divided among the Muslim fighters.

      http://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/Arlandson/jews.htm

      • Shane says

        Apr 30, 2015 at 9:42 am

        Jew hatred is in the Koran, as Muhammad hated Jews. He may have been killed by a Jewish slave who poisoned him, I certainly hope that is how Muhammad died. To some liberals and Muslims, quoting the Koran is hate speech and slander.

  2. William Lucas Harvey Jr. says

    Apr 27, 2015 at 9:58 pm

    Additionally check out:

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    CEP Releases Searchable Map and Database of World Extremist Leaders and Funders.

    Explore the background, motives and often surprising locations of the world’s most notorious extremists and funders

    April 27, 2015
    Contact: media@counterextremism.com
    Website:
    http://www.counterextremism.com/

  3. Westman says

    Apr 27, 2015 at 10:38 pm

    “..causing innocent commuters’ eyes to bleed. ”

    This statement violates the Style Book of all major news media. It is not a quote, rather it’s the personal response of a writer too lazy to poll and intetrview. This is not journalism.

  4. mortimer says

    Apr 27, 2015 at 11:46 pm

    Muslims who believe that Mohammed was divinely guided show they are unable to use logic. No highwayman or pedophile or rapist or genocidal mass murderer or deceiver or contract killer could be a valid, true prophet of god.

    There are many reasons why Mohammed could not have been a prophet:

    1. Self-declaration: Circular Argument is not evidence; there is no proof of his claim
    2. Genocide: a crime against humanity
    3. Slaver: bought, sold, hired out and used slaves, rather than ending slavery
    4. Armed robbery: claiming that Allah allows piracy is insulting to the intelligence
    5. Pedophile: a very offensive act of criminality
    6. Polygamist: a self-serving life-style that could not possibly be of divine origin
    7. Contract killer in the manner of the ‘Godfather’; a repulsive criminal conspirator
    8. Poisoned by his disciples and buried quickly under his bed to hide the crime
    9. Declared himself virtually equal to God; Allah’s vice-regent

    What sort of prophet is this?
    What sort of religion is this?
    Isn’t this a criminal conspiracy?
    Does history provide any evidence that such a person existed?

  5. jay says

    Apr 28, 2015 at 12:51 am

    Gawker is like Buzzfeed. Pop-culture propaganda. Very effective, very targeted and what the right is too stupid to figure out how to harness and use, so vehicles to our eventual commie demise.

  6. michaelwarden says

    Apr 28, 2015 at 1:54 am

    In any village here in the UK there is a “Village Idiot”. It is almost compulsory. They are generally pretty harmless and unknown outside the village. They spend time sitting on a seat on the village green and getting hammered on Saturday nights at the village pub. In America, it seems , you put your village idiots in positions of power and give them lots of publicity. I think I prefer our way – although looking at most UK politicians …. I understand that alongside Milliband’s proposed law to make criticism of Islam a crime will be the building of many new prisons to accommodate the wrongdoers. Or perhaps let out the over represented muslim prison population ?

  7. Jay Airahs says

    Apr 28, 2015 at 2:43 am

    Good morning Muslim world,

    Why do so many peaceful Muslims live in fear of those that we in the West call ‘the terrorists’?
    They are not the ones doing the killing.
    Islam is the true murderer of peaceful Muslims.
    They are merely the weapon of Islam.
    The terrorist Muslims are not confused about Islam.
    Peaceful Muslims hope life will get better for Muslims.
    It won’t.
    Killing Jews will not fix Islam.
    Killing apostates will not stop the cycle of hate.
    The jihadi is merely a weapon.
    The true murderer is Islam.
    It is time to stop fearing your neighbor.
    Fear Islam.
    Islam comes as if a friend.
    But Islam will always reject you on a whim.
    Allah is selfish and fickle just like his messenger.
    Reject Islam.
    Embrace life.

  8. Arasu says

    Apr 28, 2015 at 5:02 am

    “Does she think the Kingdom of the Two Holy Places refers to the Westminster Abbey and St. Paul’s Cathedral?”

    LOL! Good one!

  9. logdon says

    Apr 28, 2015 at 5:12 am

    ‘the concept of “lesser jihad.” As part of its #MyJihad ad campaign to “take back Islam from Muslim and anti-Muslim Extremists Alike,” that group ran a series of ads attempting to promote tolerance and understanding of the concept of “jihad,” or “struggle.”

    She get’s this wrong.

    The term Lesser Jihad actually applies to the expansionist agressive Jihad we all have come to know.

    The meaning of Greater Jihad does indicate ‘struggle’ and the striving to become a ‘good Muslim’.

    As usual within Islam face value is not quite what it means to westerners brought up on straightforward truth so the obvious meaning is reversed.

    By the way Mein Kampf translates directly to ‘My Struggle’. We allknow what that lead to.

    • mortimer says

      Apr 28, 2015 at 9:59 am

      The inner work of ‘Greater Jihad’ is to prepare oneself for the ‘Lesser Jihad’ (military warfare).

      Hannah Block-Wehba is an example of a number instant experts on Islam who have the shallowest knowledge of Islam next to nothing! She is so unacquainted with the Islamic texts and basic doctrines that she couldn’t tell ‘abrogation’ from ‘taqiyya’. She is appallingly uninformed about Islam, a complex and convoluted subject made even more so by Islamic disinformation which itself is part of the deception of jihad-warfare.

      The ‘Greater Jihad’ fallacy has been debunked by prominent Islamic scholars at Islamic universities. But that does not mean it hasn’t a purpose which is TO PREPARE FOR ACTUAL MILITARY JIHAD.

      Mohammed said that the highest act in Islam is to conduct military jihad. Mohammed is the only authority on Islam.

      Hannah Block-Wehba needs to study and learn more about Islam.

  10. Angemon says

    Apr 28, 2015 at 6:53 am

    Last week, the federal courts chalked up another victory for the defense of American freedom

    Should have stopped there…

    “Killing Jews” (the court’s abbreviation, not mine)

    (..)

    “Killing Jews” thus joins the pantheon of offensive advertising that the group has placed on public transit around the country, teaching everybody an important lesson about the First Amendment and causing innocent commuters’ eyes to bleed.

    Was that last part a citation from the court too? And what’s this alleged “important lesson about the First Amendment” supposed to be? Let me guess: “the First Amendment needs to go”. Sure, you might want to dress it up as “offensive speeches should not be allowed” but what I see here is someone misrepresenting AFDI’s ads and making a rabble-rousing speech aimed at the lower end of the IQ spectrum in order to claim the right of deciding which speech is offensive and which isn’t, effectively silencing any opposition.

    As part of its #MyJihad ad campaign to “take back Islam from Muslim and anti-Muslim Extremists Alike,”

    “Take islam back” from whom? Orthodox muslims? The hundreds of millions of muslims worldwide and throughout history who believe that they are to wage war against non-muslims for religious reasons? The people who point out that muslims believe that, and act upon their beliefs (a.k.a., “anti-muslim extremists”)?

    that group ran a series of ads attempting to promote tolerance and understanding of the concept of “jihad,” or “struggle.”

    Nope. They whipped up a series of ads designed to obfuscate the meaning of jihad as it was, and is, understood by many, many muslims worldwide. Those ads were not designed to dissuade muslims from engaging in warfare against non-muslims, they were designed to prevent non-muslims from associating jihadis with islam. Which is to say, to enforce sharia – under sharia, non-muslims aren’t allowed to criticize islam.

    This is the organization’s third victory against the MTA.

    Three times they tried to exert censorship, and three times they failed. The system works, although

    • Angemon says

      Apr 28, 2015 at 7:00 am

      Ups, accidentally posted too soon. Carrying on:

      The system works, although since Bloch-Wehba seems to think otherwise – she didn’t get the outcome she hoped therefore the system is rotten.

      Though known for its libertine ways, the MTA

      With liberals like that, who needs fascists?

      Also, a downright weird amount of First Amendment litigation is being brought by an organization that fights only for the right to say disparaging things about Muslims.

      Perhaps such litigations wouldn’t be brought up if their First Amendment rights weren’t being violated. Whatever happened to “I disagree with what you have to say but I’ll fight for your right to say it”? How can someone truly stand for freedom of speech if they want to have the final word on what speech can, and can’t, be expressed?

  11. mortimer says

    Apr 28, 2015 at 9:48 am

    Hannah Block-Wehba fails to see that facts speak for themselves. Facts have consequences and people must be held accountable whenever they commit acts of cruelty, genocide and deception. Hamas is constitutionally an anti-Semitic organization dedicated to genocide.

    The WWII Islamic participation in Hitler’s genocide against Jews was never prosecuted and punished as were the German leaders at Nuremberg. The heirs of the infamous Mufti of Jerusalem have never condemned or distanced themselves from that notorious Jew-hater al Husseini.

    If Hamas and other organizations will not denounce their anti-Semitic past, they deserve to be criticized.

  12. Joseph says

    Apr 28, 2015 at 10:46 am

    I think these ads are GREAT. They are a “BUYER BEWARE” sign that lets the average American learn the truth about Islam.
    “Average American” are the ones that only get their news from the usual corrupt sources and believe such “news”.
    “Average American” who is too lazy to dig for the truth on sites like these.
    “Average American” who believes the government will actually protect them.
    “Average American” who thinks that if Islam is ignored it will all just go away.
    “Average American” who believes the propaganda that Islam is peaceful.
    “Average American” who thinks that the terror attacks that they hear about are the ONLY ones happening
    There should be signs and posters in EVERY city. They speak the truth, it pisses the enemy off because the veil of darkness they desire is being lifted.
    The “Average American” should stop fussing with that cell phone, texting, tweeting and playing games and open their eyes as to what is really going on in the world.

  13. wildjew says

    Apr 28, 2015 at 11:48 am

    Hannah Block-Wehba is crestfallen. So is Bill O’Reilly.

  14. Lilithwept says

    Apr 28, 2015 at 12:06 pm

    What gave me chills was
    ”
    To whom was this ad demeaning? Leftists and Islamic supremacists claimed it was demeaning to all Muslims, but that was only true if every Muslim supported the savage jihad against Israel — the murder of civilians, the passing-out of candy to celebrate those murders, etc. We made this point again and again at the time, but it was always brushed aside, as it didn’t fit the mainstream media narrative.”

    It reminded me of an article I read about a Scandinavian politician ( cant remember details, senior moment!) who went to jail because of whatbhe said about Islam. The part that gave me chills reading and has haunted me since is that whatvthis man said was just the truth, as written in Islamic books, in this case the Quran. But the scary part was that ” telling the truth was no defense against hate speech accusations.” That telling the truth, the FACT that ALL the politician said was written in the writings of the religion itself, it still didnt matter, and was no defense”
    This scares me to death because we are a short step away from this here in the US and if Labour’s Milliband is elected in the UK, and does as he has stated, then UK will have crossed that line. I am so afraid because denial of the truth, that even if its the truth and in a religions writings, if it hurst their feelings, makes them feel,oppressed, then THEY say its Hate Soeech and you could be jailed for saying/writing this.
    I am SO grateful for Pam Geller and her organization for fighting for our freedom of Speech. God knows the average American ( like myself) cant afford to go to court and fight. I have a name for people like Pam Geller and those like her who are desperately trying to tell the truth and wake people up to Islam…..they are 21st Centuary Crusaders ……Crusadin for truth, Freedom and the preservation of Western Civilization. It seems omly Muslims and muslim apologists mis understand and hate the word “crusader” and want you to feel guilty for being from the West. So I would be proud to say I am a 21st Centuary Crusader!!! And insttead of the battle cry ” deus vult” or God Wills it, I say our battle cry should be Truth!!! Freedom!!!! Democracy!!!!!

  15. Champ says

    Apr 28, 2015 at 1:30 pm

    …she laments that “a downright weird amount of First Amendment litigation is being brought by an organization that fights only for the right to say disparaging things about Muslims.”

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Of course the “disparaging things about muslims” that she’s referring to is the ugly Truth about islam & company, so the ugly Truth is too hot for her to handle. Defending islam means that you are defending evil …and it is not the Most High God they serve, but satan.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Crusades Were Right on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • curious george on Israel At A Crossroads?
  • Crusades Were Right on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • William Garrison on The Fantasy Islam of Rice University’s Craig Considine (Part 3)

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.