Ramadi is in Iraq’s Anbar province, and its strategic importance is huge. Anbar’s governor, Ahmed al-Dulaimi, said in November 2014: “If we lose Anbar, that means we will lose Iraq.”
So yesterday the Pentagon told us that the Islamic State had lost 25% of its territory, and today they’re on the verge of capturing a city that could give them a distinct advantage in capturing all of Iraq. Do you ever get the impression that the Pentagon is more interested in making the Obama airstrikes look successful than in leveling with us?
“Ramadi could fall as ISIS militants lay siege, Iraqi official warns,” by Hamdi Alkhshali, Arwa Damon and Jethro Mullen, CNN, April 15, 2015:
West of Baghdad, Iraq (CNN)Falih Essawi shouted on the phone as he described his situation. From his point of view, ISIS militants might be just hours away from taking the key Iraqi city of Ramadi.
Fierce fighting has engulfed Ramadi, which lies only about 70 miles (113 kilometers) west of Baghdad and is the capital of Anbar province, Iraq’s Sunni heartland.
Essawi, the deputy head of the Anbar Provincial Council, told CNN from inside the city Wednesday that it’s unclear how much longer government troops can hold their front lines against the ISIS offensive.
The politician said he was on a front line himself, armed with a machine gun. Security was “collapsing rapidly in the city,” and he begged the Iraqi government for reinforcements and the U.S.-led coalition against ISIS for air support.
“This is what we warned Baghdad of what’s going to happen,” Essawi told CNN by phone, referring to the Iraqi government at the capital. “Where is Baghdad? Where is al-Abadi?”
His plea for help comes the day after Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi met with U.S. President Barack Obama in Washington to seek more support for the fight against ISIS.
“Just Allah knows if we will survive this,” Essawi said.
The extremist group’s offensive in Ramadi shows its resilience despite months of U.S.-led airstrikes and its recent defeat by Iraqi forces in the northern city of Tikrit.
ISIS squeezing Ramadi
ISIS fighters have Ramadi under pressure from several angles.
Essawi said ISIS militants made significant advances Wednesday in three areas east of Ramadi: Albu Soda, Albu Ghanem and parts of Soufia, which leads to central Ramadi.
Over the weekend, the militants seized control of areas north of Ramadi. Routes south of the city were taken some months ago.
That leaves only areas to the west of Ramadi in the hands of government forces, but those positions are under threat, Essawi warned.
The recent fighting has driven a steady stream of refugees out of the city. On Wednesday, some residents packed what they could into metal carts as they prepared to flee on foot.
People also were fleeing the areas where ISIS was advancing east of Ramadi….
Papa Whiskey says
But .. but … “the tide of war is receding!” Dear Leader said so, again and again! I heard him in 2012! On teevee!
pongidae rex says
The West is a lifeboat in an ocean of desperate, drowning people. How long can it stay afloat?
Westman says
Some sarcasm here.
I’m confused. The Daesh(ISIS) is Sunni and the Iraqi majority is Sunni. So what the Iraqis have most to lose by an ISIS takeover is any freedom for deviation from strict Sharia – essentially their freedom.
Yet, in Europe, we keep seeing Muslim demonstration signs about, “To hell with your freedom”, and, “Sharia for Britain”, etc.
I have this confusing thought that Muslims in Europe care less about having freedom than Muslims in Iraq?
Ernie says
Dear Westman , shiítes are the majority in Iraq , sunnites are a minority .
Westman says
My error,
I forgot that Saddam was a kind of tyrannical secular-Sunni holding down the majority Shia. And now he’s gone, Iran is able to extend its influence there.
That brings up another question: How did Saddam manage a war with Iran for 8 years with only 32% Sunnis? Did the Iraqi Sunnis suffer more losses than the Iraqi Shia’a in that war or was there a real sense of nationalism(or draft)?
There appears to be little fealty in Islam so what kind of emotional disaster was the Shia fighting Shia part of that war?
Brian says
Read a book guy. Please. You make conservatives look bad.
mortimer says
Arabs seem unable to fight coherently. They raid, they feint, then they collapse and run. It takes an all-out jihad to make them stick to it.
Jihad is the only thing that can make Arabs risk their lives…not freedom, not national defense.
umbra says
That’s how cowards fight. Not all jihadis risk their life, some do flee from battlefields – in disguise even. It would be so much easier if all jihadis were faithful to their own islamic martyrdom.