“You must kill children without compassion, you must kill women, Jews, infidels and Shiites,” as “this is the true path, the path of Allah.” To try to combat this, “the authorities have already banned the use of the veil for female students, admission of children to mosques and forced thousands of students who were studying in Islamic schools abroad to return home.” You might almost get the impression that they think this has something to do with Islam.
“Former jihadist escapes from the Islamic state: We had to kill everyone, without pity,” Asia News, April 16, 2015 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
Dushanbe (AsiaNews) – ” They said: ‘You must kill children without compassion, you must kill women, Jews, infidels and Shiites’. This is the testimony of a young Tajik, recruited in Moscow by the militia of the Islamic State (IS) to fight in Syria and who managed to escape.
The man, fled to Turkey, and managed to return to his country of origin where he spoke to Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty about how the terrorists enticed him and other men through the internet: “There are websites that say: ‘This is the true path, the path of Allah’. But it wasn’t only that. We also heard lectures promising rewards from Allah if you become a martyr”.
Once he had left Russia, the man only realized the consequences of his choice when he arrived in Turkey. He said that he and other comrades thought they were going to Syria to study, not to fight. The militiamen instead incited them to brutally kill anyone they saw, even women and children. Moreover if they died as martyrs then, their wives “would be married to other jihadists.”
The recruiting foreign fighters by the Caliphate, is an obvious problem in several Central Asian countries, which have implemented initiatives to protect the territories that border with Afghanistan. Recently, the International Crisis Group (ICG) released a report in which it estimated that between 2 thousand and 4 thousand citizens of Central Asian origin have joined Islamic extremists in Syria over the past three years.
In December 2014, the Tajik President Emomali Rakhmon acknowledged that several young people had joined the ranks of the militia in the Middle East and described IS as “a modern plague that poses a serious threat to global security.” Rakhmon added that Tajik citizens who join the terrorists’ cause are a “source of instability in society”, because they are recruited in the country through new forms of communication.
On April13, the Commission for Religious Affairs and Cultural Rights has decided to respond to the president’s appeal – who last month called on all authorities to promote the development of a secular society – and banned pilgrimages to Mecca (hajj) to those under 35. The Committee argues that the ban is a useful attempt to prevent the formation of radical ideas among young people. In contrast according to experts this makes it a great opportunity for older Muslims to make the pilgrimage, since Saudi Arabia has limited the annual number of the faithful who travel to the holy sites.
The Committee has also added a series of measures implemented by the government in Dushanbe to spread the principles of the secular state, in a country where Muslims are 97% of 8 million inhabitants. The authorities have already banned the use of the veil for female students, admission of children to mosques and forced thousands of students who were studying in Islamic schools abroad to return home.
Scott says
Until our Judeophobic/Chrisianophobic President develops a moral conscience……..this will continue.
Sam says
“Until our Judeophobic/Chrisianophobic President develops a moral conscience……..this will continue”.
What will you do with the populace who elected him twice?
gravenimage says
Sam, the threat of Islam isn’t even on the radar for most of the people who voted for Obama. They just swallowed the whole “hope and change” thing.
William Lucas Harvey Jr. says
“You must kill children without compassion” for the “path of Allah”. You might almost get the impression that they think this has something to do with Islam”.
But – But – our “Glorious”, “Trustworthy”, “Truthful” Leader Barack Hussein Obama Jr., and HIS Administration, keeps telling us that the “Islamic States” and the Islamic Bloody Butchery and Savagery have “Nothing to do with Islam” – that we shouldn’t believe our “Lying Eyes” and our “Lying Ears” – could the Leader of America actually be “B.S.ing” us and really be Pro Islam Pro Muslim and Anti America, Anti Constitution, Anti Christian, and Islam is really NOT the “Religion of Peace” – is that possible ??
ANSWER: Most informed Americans already KNOW the very obvious answer, from Islam’s and Obama’s, and his Administration’s, already well DOCUMENTED Words, Actions, and Deeds.
vlparker says
You must kill children without compassion for the path of Allah. And that tells you all you need to know about islam.
Sabri S. says
This is a gross distortion of real islam…the problem always seems
To be originated from Saudis, Iran or Pakistanis. Every other muslim
Country on the planet can show a positive contribution or neutral
Contribution to the world. ALSO, it is amazing the lack of input or
Response from American born and raised muslims….ditto for Europe.
These savages do not follow or exhibit the best of Islam…
deja vu says
1. ‘This is a gross distortion of real islam…the problem always seems To be originated from Saudis, Iran or Pakistanis’
What is the ‘real Islam’ doing about it?
2. ‘ Every other muslim Country on the planet can show a positive contribution or neutral Contribution to the world.’
(a) Can you name these positive contributions?
(b) Please give an example of a ‘neutral contribution’.
Gary says
Wow! Your description of the Muslim “faith” is one of the best I’ve come across. Very insightful and articulate….. Diabolic counterfeit/Anti-Christ. Chilling. Yet so true.
deja vu says
Thanks Gary. It must be one of the greatest deceptions ever conceived since the Garden of Eden.
Champ says
Great comment, Deja Vu! …I completely agree with Gary 🙂
gravenimage says
Sabri S. wrote:
This is a gross distortion of real islam…the problem always seems
To be originated from Saudis, Iran or Pakistanis. Every other muslim
Country on the planet can show a positive contribution or neutral
Contribution to the world.
……………………………….
Really? Oddly, the Taliban, Al Shebaab, and Boko Haram are not out of Saudi Arabia, Iran, or Pakistan. I could list scores of other Jihad groups.
As for the idea that “every other muslim Country on the planet can show a positive or neutral Contribution to the world”, does that mean that Sabri S. condones Jihad attacks out of Somalia on Kenya, Sudan enslaving southern Christians, northern Nigeria sentencing rape victims to stoning, and the Islamic State beheading journalists and aid workers? It would appear so…
More:
And let’s ALSO, it is amazing the lack of input or
Response from American born and raised muslims….ditto for Europe.
……………………………….
That’s because so many of these upstanding Mohammedans are too busy beheading grandmas in their gardens, setting off bombs at races, “Honor killing” disobedient women, and plotting the next 9/11.
More:
These savages do not follow or exhibit the best of Islam…
……………………………….
What rot. This sanguinary horror is *exactly* on the tenets of the Qur’an and Hadith, and the baleful model of the “Prophet”. This *is* the “best of Islam”, from the most Islamic of Muslims.
Denying this is nothing but Taqiyya for the credulous Kuffar.
quotha raven says
Go get ’em, gravenimage! Clear and pithy style, as always!
Cheers! qr
gravenimage says
Thank you, quotha.
ECAW says
“Denying this is nothing but Taqiyya for the credulous Kuffar.”
gravenimage – more interesting and puzzling, and possibly more dangerous, are those who are not consciously fooling the kuffar but are utterly genuine. I’ve been reading this:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Covenants-Prophet-Muhammad-Christians-World/dp/159731465X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1429352787&sr=1-1&keywords=john+morrow
I think this book is important and should be more widely known among counter-jihad people as it’s increasingly being used to spread a falsely benign picture of Mo, as shown here:
http://www.covenantsoftheprophet.com/
Saps like Craig Considine swallow the book whole without the ability or inclination to question it (JW a while back) but I’m convinced that Morrow believes every word he writes. The puzzle to me is how he can idolize Mohammed and manage to ignore all his crimes according to his greatest fans not his enemies.
quotha raven says
To Everything Changed…
I looked at the link to Amazon for this book and was instantly dubious…to say the least! From the Amazon description:
“The Prophet Muhammad’s treaties with the Christians of his time, which John Andrew Morrow has rediscovered in obscure collections and often newly translated, uniformly state that Muslims are not to attack peaceful Christian communities, but defend them “until the End of the World.” Authored by the Prophet himself, they represent a third foundational pillar for Islam outside of Qur’an and hadith.”
Yeah, right, right?
Also rather puzzling and creepily instructive is that all the (about 6, as I recall) reader-reviewers granted 5* or 4* to the book. to me it seems like wildly successful propaganda. Can Morrow really be sincere?
Haven’t read this book but admiring of you for doing so, my initial response to the reviews and description make me v skeptical and suspicious that I would develop instant agita where I to try to read this work. With takiyya in mind, were Morrow, scholarly though he may appear, it is hard for me to imagine his being sincere for reasons noted by other commenters here. With the “discovery” of a whole new chunk or the “original” Qur’an, it seems like a giant takiyya contribution to the world’s understanding of Islam.In other words, it has the potential to be extremely (no pun intended) successful propaganda.
gravenimage says
Thanks for posting this, ECAW. I notice one of the reviewers is the meretricious Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, who pushes the idea that the American constitution is “Shari’ah compliant”, and Omid Safi, who has ludicrously claimed that the entirely civilized Robert Spencer has threatened him.
The fact is that all of these “covenants” were fakes drawn up by desperate Christians hoping to deflect Muslim savagery. Even one of the Muslim reviewers points out what an obvious fraud the covenant with the monks of St. Catherine is.
By the way, despite his very Western sounding name, John Andrew Morrow is himself a Muslim convert—his Muslim name is Ilyas ‘Abd al-‘Alim Islam. Here’s his Wikipedia page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Andrew_Morrow
Charles Upton is also a Muslim convert—a witless beat poet from my neck of the woods—the San Francisco bay area—who joined the Sufi order.
Besides the obvious frauds, Morrow also cites the pact with the Christians of Narjan—one presumes he ignores the follow up, where these Christians were all later exiled or killed.
Shockingly, one of the reviewers, Faroque Ahmed Khan, cites the horrific Pact of Umar favorably—presumably Morrow does as well.
But this is the ur-document of dhimmitude, where Christians are systematically oppressed and threatened second-class citizens under Islam.
In this interview, Morrow ludicrously blames the persecution of Christians by Muslims on “colonialism”:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/takeandread/2013/12/muhammads-word-to-christians-of-the-world-a-qa-with-john-andrew-morrow/
His main thesis—grotesquely ahistorical—is that Muslim violence is very recent, and is the fault of capitalism and Western democracy. He does not say precisely what he wants to see these replaced with, but he lauds the Caliphate and savage Shari’ah law.
In the end, it may not matter all that much whether this is a deliberate whitewash or something Morrow actually believes, because the content is just as harmful either way.
quotha raven says
to gravenimage – in response to yrs above that contains “…:The fact is that all of these “covenants” were fakes drawn up by desperate Christians hoping to deflect Muslim savagery. Even one of the Muslim reviewers points out what an obvious fraud the covenant with the monks of St. Catherine is….” which responds not only to ECAW but to my own skepticism about this book as well. How totally important to realize that Morrow is a convert. Phew!
Thank you for another trenchant, extremely clear and concise post. You’ve been one of my favorite and most trusted commenters on JW for ages.
I do, actually, have a question for you, graven. I looked at the drawing you did of Mohammed and his young bride. Um…what happened to his willy? ))))quotha
ECAW says
quotha raven & gravenimage
I would like to see people capable of challenging this book on a scholarly level – Spencer, Bostom, Durie etc – taking it on. Are there any such people left in academia now or have they all been squeezed out by Mohammed’s intellectual groupies?
I started out expecting this to be a conscious exercise in taqqiyah but now think it more dangerous because of Morrow’s clear sincerity. Have you heard that marketing saying that it’s the “iasm” ie “I Am Sold Myself” in enthusiasm that makes the sale? How he squares his benign Mo and Islam with the versions we see is a mystery to me but I’m working on it.
My concern is that we can expect to see Islamoapologists using it the way the appalling Mehdi Hassan uses Tahir-ul-Qadri’s deceptive fatwa against terrorism (exposed by RS) and regurgitated by credulous fools like Considine, and we should be able to refute such attempts when we see them.
Regarding the Pact of Umar, Morrow says that the one we all know is a fake and “Even Robert Spencer the anti-Islamic activist admits that it is not authentic. Still he does not hesitate to to exploit the document to demonstrate that Muslims are intolerant”. He also claims that there is a genuine, more benign Pact (or Treaty) of Umar to be found in al-Tabari’s Tarikh. This is the kind of thing that scholars could get to the bottom of.
Lastly, this is my favourite bit of the book so far:
“If Jews and Muslims once lived in harmony in many Arab countries, sharing the same common language, culture and traditions, the establishment of the State of Israel ruined a millenium and a half of conviviality”
Trust those Jews to spoil a party!
quotha raven says
Everything Changed – To yrs below (above?) that sez: ““If Jews and Muslims once lived in harmony in many Arab countries, sharing the same common language, culture and traditions, the establishment of the State of Israel ruined a millenium and a half of conviviality”
What a crock, eh?
I am truly sorry I don’t qualify to respond as a respected academic or expert. I had exposure to the academic world for a few years when my husband, a Yale grad and Columbia PhD, taught at the university level during the 70s. I was just a faculty wife. And that part of my life has been over for decades. I am sure, however, that someone here at JW amongst the commenters is fully capable and has the intellectual energy to make an effort to decry what sounds like a monster of a book. Hang in there – I just know there are a number of brilliant academic minds ruminating over just how to do exactly that.
Keep on keeping on, ECAW. Yours are always good posts. Cheers! quotha
gravenimage says
Thanks again so much for your kind words, quotha. As for Muhammed’s “willy”, I put it in deep shadow—the picture is already necessarily disturbing enough without exposing viewers to that detail.
gravenimage says
ECAW wrote:
quotha raven & gravenimage
I would like to see people capable of challenging this book on a scholarly level – Spencer, Bostom, Durie etc – taking it on. Are there any such people left in academia now or have they all been squeezed out by Mohammed’s intellectual groupies?
……………………………….
There aren’t many, ECAW. You might consider writing Robert Spencer and seeing if he’d be interested in doing a formal review of this book.
More:
I started out expecting this to be a conscious exercise in taqqiyah but now think it more dangerous because of Morrow’s clear sincerity. Have you heard that marketing saying that it’s the “iasm” ie “I Am Sold Myself” in enthusiasm that makes the sale? How he squares his benign Mo and Islam with the versions we see is a mystery to me but I’m working on it.
……………………………….
It’s certainly *possible* that Morrow actually believes in a peaceful “Prophet”, ECAW—but how anyone can after any study at all means he must be in deep denial. After all, it is not “Islamophobes”, but the texts of Islam itself which paint him as a bloody barbarian.
Morrow is what we would call Native American or Canadian “First People”—he embraced Islam after reading Malcolm X. Like so many Black Muslims, his embrace of Islam seems to be some sort of perverse rejection of Western “colonialism”. These idiots seem not to have grasped how truly oppressive Islam is—including slavery.
Here’s an interview with him:
http://craigconsidinetcd.com/2014/02/09/interview-on-scholars-spiritual-journey-into-islam-and-the-life-of-prophet-muhammad/
Of course, he says disturbing things such as “sometimes, however, peace can only be achieved by eliminating the enemy”. This is, in fact, *entirely* what the “peace” of Islam is based on: slaughtering not just Infidels but also “other sect” Muslims and the “insufficiently Islamic”. But this is endlessly reductive, and leads—as we see every day—to Jihadists butchering other Jihadists. There is no end to Muslim savagery.
He also says, “Obviously, as Muslims, we are not going to wait until someone attacks us before we prepare to defend ourselves.” The problem, of course, is not that Muslims “prepare” to defend themselves, but that they attack first, and against anyone from whom they so much as fear disobedience. (This is the basis of wife beating in Islam, as well).
Unbelievably he claims that “Muslims went to war in al-Andalus to liberate the Jews and Catholics from the oppression of the Visigoths”. Of course, this is utter crap—by the time Mohammedans invaded, the Visigoths themselves were Christian, and had been for some time.
Needless to say, no contemporary Muslim made such a claim.
He also claims, even more grotesquely, that “Muslims went to war in Armenia to free the Christians from the oppression of the Byzantines”. Of course, Muslims wanted to destroy “Rum” from the time of the “Prophet”.
That Morrow would make this jaw-dropping claim *on the hundredth anniversary of the Armenian Genocide* is even more grotesque. By the way, he blames the entire Armenian Genocide on the Young Turks—but it began under the Ottoman Empire, continued through the period of the Young Turks, and continued into Attatürk’s era.
Ultimately, it may make little difference whether Morrow is using Taqiyya or has simply sold himself on his own bullsh*t.
More:
My concern is that we can expect to see Islamoapologists using it the way the appalling Mehdi Hassan uses Tahir-ul-Qadri’s deceptive fatwa against terrorism (exposed by RS) and regurgitated by credulous fools like Considine, and we should be able to refute such attempts when we see them.
……………………………….
Agreed. Whatever Morrow’s intent, there’s no doubt that his book can be used both by cynical Taqiyya artists and by hopeful Infidels to whitewash Islam.
More:
Regarding the Pact of Umar, Morrow says that the one we all know is a fake and “Even Robert Spencer the anti-Islamic activist admits that it is not authentic. Still he does not hesitate to to exploit the document to demonstrate that Muslims are intolerant”. He also claims that there is a genuine, more benign Pact (or Treaty) of Umar to be found in al-Tabari’s Tarikh. This is the kind of thing that scholars could get to the bottom of.
……………………………….
It is likely true that the Pact of Umar is a fake—but it hardly matters. It just attributes to Umar the dhimmitude that has since been codified in Muslim lands. Even today, one finds the *exact* same strictures one finds in the pact, such as preventing Christians from repairing churches or Infidels from any equal status with Muslims. That is why I frequently cite the Pact of Umar myself.
This is different sort of fake from those of Muhammed promising to protect Infidels, which were drawn up by desperate Kuffar hoping to deflect Muslim savagery.
That Muslims are now *themselves* using these fakes to fool Infidels into believing Islam is not violent is deeply perverse, but hardly surprising.
And I’ve never heard of this “more benign” pact—but it hardly matters, because we know that Muslims treat Infidels *exactly* along the lines of the Pact of Umar.
More:
Lastly, this is my favourite bit of the book so far:
“If Jews and Muslims once lived in harmony in many Arab countries, sharing the same common language, culture and traditions, the establishment of the State of Israel ruined a millenium and a half of conviviality”
Trust those Jews to spoil a party!
……………………………….
Yes—I’d noticed his predictable antisemitism myself. And note what this is *really* saying—that Muslims are fine with Jews as long as they are under their heel. Of course, this is also false, but even what they are trying to sell us is incredibly ugly.
Interesting exchange with you and quotha raven, ECAW.
particolor says
Please Explain the Best of Islam ? It seems to be somewhat Obscure to us in Australia at the moment !
With the planned attacks on our Anzac Day Memorial Services, by the “Religion of Peace” being Kicked in the Backside by the Cops !
Or did You mean the Beast of Islam ?
somehistory says
already banned the use of the veil for female students, admission of children to mosques and forced thousands of students who were studying in Islamic schools abroad to return home.
****************************************************************************************************
Great first steps. Next, now, ban islam and all that goes with the evil beast of satan.
mortimer says
They recognize that the veil is a slippery slope to fanaticism.
They are admitting that Islam per se is the problem of the instability.
gravenimage says
“You must kill children without compassion” for the “path of Allah”
………………………….
*This* is the naked face of Islam.
rab says
OK! Killing kids is harrum! They are needed for sex suicide bombers!
Sabri S. says
I sure can Deja vu….khazakst and Uzbekistan are thriving societies,
With strong oil and gas industries…aND they don’t need fra c king to do it.
indonesia and Malaysia rank in the top 20 emerging economies in the world.
I lived in Morocco – a neutral country, with a history that dates back 1500 years,
And still acts as an economic conduit to Europe via Spain and gilbralter.
You never hear about these do you?…but you can’t go a day without hearing
About the three embarrassing countries I mentioned. And don’t get me started on
Brunei, the United Arab Emirates and qatar…any economic or problems with islam
In any of these countries….Focus on facts, and don’t rely on cnn for real info…
somehistory says
You wrote: “indonesia and Malaysia rank in the top 20 emerging economies in the world.”
Using Indonesia as a good example of what is *positive* about islam….
Well, now money isn’t everything….not even the most important thing.
See this headline:
Female genital mutilation persists in Indonesia
Found right here on JW, so you can read the story and see just what ol’ indonesia is up to with its islam.
Hint: it’s really, really awful!!
underbed cat says
To add to the Indonesia comment…..remember Malaysia had so many disasters with their planes and is a member of the OIC , so therefore Islamic there is no compassion for infidels children included, removing head scarfs won’t solve that problem. I don’t see how Islam can reformed…without the call to jihad which means death to those who are Christian or Jews ….
head coverings are a political statement…This is awful. But maybe it is a start…although I think it will be meet with push back.
terry says
Sabri,
Don’t waste your time here as many of us visiting this site, Dr. Wafa Sultan, Ayan Hirsio, Ali, Salman Rushdi, IQ Al Rassouli, Robert Spencer and thousands upon thousands of people who left Islam know Islam inside out!
It’s better for you to take the Quran, Hadiths and Sunnah and go talk to your brothers in ISIS, BokoHaram, Al Shabab, Al Qaeda…..etc., about why what they are doing is wrong, based on these three Islamic sources.
Our knowledge about Islam is not from CNN, BBC, CBC, ABC or KFC, but is based on these three sources, mentioned in the last paragraph. To the contrary, I stopped about two years ago, tuning in to mainstream media for news as I was getting sicker hearing them everyday saying how Islam is a religion of love, peace and mercy and who are always trying to minimize its role in most of the unspeakable atrocities and crimes committed world wide, these days.
Here is what the ex Mufti of Turkey said about your beautiful religion:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/08/turkish-ex-mufti-on-muhammad-so-many-people-cant-live-properly-because-of-him
Here is what an ex Muslim and the son of an imam said about your peaceful and merciful religion:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/09/ex-muslim-and-son-of-imam-islamic-state-following-steps-of-islams-prophet-muhammad-to-the-letter
deja vu says
Sabri S
1. You didn’t answer my question. Nor did you define a ‘neutral contribution’.
2. You state: ‘khazakst and Uzbekistan are thriving societies,With strong oil and gas industries.’
This is missing the point. The fact that a nation sits on top of an oil or gas field is not a positive contribution to anyone other than to the country concerned. Leaving aside that they utilize the equipment invented by others to extract the oil and gas, what are their human rights records? I quote:
(a)’Kazakhstan heavily restricts freedom of assembly, speech, and religion. In 2014, authorities closed newspapers, jailed or fined dozens of people after peaceful but unsanctioned protests, and fined or detained worshipers for practicing religion outside state controls. Government critics, including opposition leader Vladimir Kozlov, remained in detention after unfair trials.
In mid-2014, Kazakhstan adopted new criminal ,criminal executive, criminal procedural, and administrative codes, and a new law on trade unions, which contain articles restricting fundamental freedoms and are incompatible with international standards. Torture remains common in places of detention.’
(b) ‘Uzbekistan’s atrocious rights record did not discernibly improve in 2014. Authoritarian President Islam Karimov, who entered his 25th year in power, continued to employ a widespread security apparatus to monitor and crack down on activities of real and perceived opponents.
Authorities repress all forms of freedom of expression and do not allow any organized political opposition, independent media, free trade unions, independent civil society organizations, or religious freedom. Those who attempt to assert rights, or act in ways deemed contrary to state interests, face arbitrary detention, lack of due process, and torture. Forced labor of adults and children continues.
Uzbekistan’s record of cooperation with UN human rights mechanisms is arguably among the worst in the world. For the past 12 years, it has ignored requests for access by all 11 UN human rights experts, and has rejected virtually all recommendations that international bodies have made for human rights improvements.’
A small sample of the reality in both these countries. I don’t consider that either of them have made a ‘positive contribution’ to either their own populations or to the world at large.
Brunei has nothing to boast of, unless you consider the level of opulence as the only criterion for judging worth. Again I quote:
‘Earlier this year, Brunei started the process of introducing Sharia law into its penal code. The new Penal Code contains a range of provisions that restrict the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. They include harsh penalties for not performing Friday prayers or observing Ramadan and expanded restrictions on the rights of individuals to hold or change their religious beliefs or to speak freely about those beliefs.
The revised laws also criminalize printing, disseminating, importing, broadcasting, and distributing of publications deemed contrary to Sharia. When fully implemented, the code will include the punishment of stoning to death, and the criminalisation and application of the death penalty for consensual sex between adults.’
Sounds like bliss.
And what about the UAE and Qatar? Fabulously wealthy thanks to its gas reserves, but what of the slave labour which has been exploited to build its glitzy cities?
Perhaps you haven’t heard that: ‘Individuals taking advantage of Qatar’s ‘permissive jurisdiction’ for terror finance have provided funding in recent years to the leaders of ISIS, the Khorasan Group, the Nusra Front (under which Khorasan operates), al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, al-Shabaab, the Taliban, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and core al Qaeda in Pakistan, to name just a few.’
The UAE does not fare much better – ostentatious on the surface, troubling under the surface. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) continued in 2014 to arbitrarily detain individuals it perceives as posing a threat to national security, and its security forces continued to face allegations that they torture detainees in pretrial detention. UAE courts invoked repressive laws to prosecute government critics, and a new counterterrorism law poses a further threat to government critics and rights activists. Migrant construction workers on one of the country’s most high-profile projects continued to face serious exploitation, and female domestic workers were still excluded from regulations that apply to workers in other sectors.
Look beyond the obscene wealth of these nations and tell us, Sabri, why they do not use their wealth for humanitarian aid and assist Muslims fleeing conflicts caused by other Muslims. Why do they contribute a pittance (or nothing at all) after an earthquake or other natural disaster in the Muslim world, such as the Boxing Day tsunami or the terrible floods and landslips in Pakistan? Could it be that wealth is corrupting? Could it be that non-Islamic nations score better when it comes to compassion and human rights? If that is the case, why are Islamic nations so repressive – what are they afraid of if, as they claim, Islam is superior?
I don’t consider these wealthy nations contribute anything of value to the world. They seem only interested in enriching themselves.
gravenimage says
The appalling Sabri S. wrote:
I sure can Deja vu….khazakst and Uzbekistan are thriving societies,
With strong oil and gas industries…aND they don’t need fra c king to do it.
indonesia and Malaysia rank in the top 20 emerging economies in the world.
I lived in Morocco – a neutral country, with a history that dates back 1500 years…and don’t get me started on Brunei, the United Arab Emirates and qatar…any economic or problems with islam In any of these countries….Focus on facts, and don’t rely on cnn for real info…
………………………….
Actually, every one of these Mohammedan countries oppresses its non-Muslim population.
Even more shocking is that he singles out Brunei as having no “problems with Islam”—a place that has just imposed brutal Shari’ah law, *including stoning*.
“Brunei’s Sultan to impose Sharia this week, complete with stonings and amputations”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/03/bruneis-sultan-to-impose-sharia-this-week-complete-with-stonings-and-amputations
Now we know what this Muslim savage’s standards are. *Ugh*.
particolor says
CROSS Him off Your Christmas Card list !! 🙁
gravenimage says
Hah!
Avenger says
Sabri, the Indonesia muslims slaughtered their way to being top dog. Without their oil-gas reserves and short term gains of deforestation they would be a human cesspool. All the countries you speak so highly of would look like modern day Bangladesh if they didn’t happen to squat on abundant natural wealth.
Accept reality Sabri, wherever your fetid religion exists there is carnage, suffering and stagnation.
mortimer says
The Tajik government has made an IPSO FACTO ADMISSION that ISLAM IS THE PROBLEM by demanding a MORE SECULAR society and banning Pilgrimages to Mecca!
The fact is that in all countries where there are Muslims, the MOST DANGEROUS ACTIVITY is in Islamic STUDY GROUPS where young people learn the FOUNDATIONAL TEXTS of Islam and learn the individual DUTY TO JIHAD.
This is ‘radicalization’ in the sense that they are nourished from the evil, toxic ROOTS OF ISLAM…from authentic, foundational Islam…not the watered down version.
William Lucas Harvey Jr. says
Actually calling Islam a “Religion” is a misnomer, ” Islam is a total system of life and contains within itself a particular social system, judicial system, and political system which includes geo-political aspirations – the conquest and administration of territory”
http://newenglishreview.org/Rebecca_Bynum/Why_Islam_is_Not_a_Religion/
bobm says
they are antichrist indeed…..1 John 2:22…………….
a blood cult of death… remember the face recently of the cultist jihadi stating how he loves the taste of our blood…
Mad Vlad turned them back at the mere sight of horrors unimaginable…… this brotherhood of darkness… respect for darkness untold… these vampiric sons of darkness…. antichrist indeed.
particolor says
The BLACK BURQUA of Islam is being placed on the head of the FREE WORLD !!
Cindy McCoy says
These people are demon possessed. allah is not a god but is Satan himself. This is despicable and the world is waiting. Waiting for what??? If we don’t end them where they are they will be here, was won’t have to go get them, they will come to us.
duh_swami says
… “You must kill children without compassion, you must kill women, Jews, infidels and Shiites,” as “this is the true path, the path of Allah’…
That would make a good statement on one Pam’s bus ads…
This kind of demonic mind set is why anyone who believes Allah is God can’t be trusted…
Richie says
At the very least, you have to credit Muslims for being honest when they openly call for the murder of children- and cite their demonic death cult Islam as justification- because they are indeed following the evil teachings of their Koran. . What I will never understand are leftist who constantly give cover to muslims and insist that islam is a relgion of peac- when even most muslims admit that it most certainly is not a religion of peace
Michael Copeland says
Peace? Why yes: “Peace is when the whole world is muslim”, said Sayeed Qutb, co-founder of the Muslim Brotherhood.
How do you attain peace?
“ Jihad (holy fighting in Allah’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you.” Koran 2:216, part of Islamic law (with the death penalty for denying it).
Richie says
This may explain why the surviving Tsarayev Boston bomber terrorist deliberately placed a bomb behind a group of children. He got is wish, one child was killed, scores of others dismembered by the blast.
I wonder how many Muslims faround the world elt joy in their dark hearts when they heard a child was one of the 3 killed during that terrorist attack
somehistory says
It isn’t joy they feel, as we know joy is one of the fruits of God’s Holy Spirit.(Galatians 5:22-23)
What they feel is demonic glee…can’t really be described with human words as it isn’t human to feel as they do. This is also the reason they cannot know peace and have no self-control (as well as the rest of the positive aspects listed by Paul).
abad says
Islam is the most morally bankrupt religion on the planet – Muhammad himself was so full of sin he could bathe in a tub of bleach and that would not cleanse him of his wicked sins. And Muslims why they continue to be looked down upon as inferior to the rest of the civilized world.
M S case says
“the path of allah” was mentioned by someone in an earlier post…..If murdering children is the path of allah then someone should lay siege to the path and completely and absolutely destroy the path. Lay traps and snares in the form of fire bombs and carpet bombing and even nukes(questionable) and yes boots on the ground (maybe not just U.S. boots)
Once again the U. S must take up the role of the world’s police force and lead.. Destroy those who would destroy you. Or….just sit back and say Oh………”that”……… is……. “over there”……. and not coming my way so why should I get involved ‘”Complaisance is the father of death and the mother of decay”.
gravenimage says
Once again I am struck by the sheer horror of this—what decent person would want to be on any path that requires the killing of children, and further emphasizes that this must be without compassion?
Islam—the religion of sociopathic evil.