• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

WSJ falsely claims AFDI/Jihad Watch Muhammad cartoon contest winner Bosch Fawstin goes into hiding

May 6, 2015 7:09 am By Robert Spencer

UPDATE: Bosch Fawstin wrote this on Twitter: “Despite a Dishonest Wall Street Journal headline story saying I’ve gone into hiding b/c I’ve gotten death threats, I’ve Not gone into hiding”

What I wrote in the original post below about the craven capitulation of the media is only underscored by this.

The headline above has been adjusted. Here is the original post:

—–

SpencerFawstinWildersGellerHere again, the media will say, Welll…he had it coming…he shouldn’t have provoked them…he should have stuck to some respectable art form like sticking a crucifix in a jar of urine…

What the opinionmakers on both the Left and the Right refuse to realize is that it will be something else next time. Once the dastardly Muhammad cartoonists are all safely murdered, perhaps Laura Ingraham and Bill O’Reilly and Greta van Susteren and Martha MacCallum the entire Left media think that the jihadis will be appeased, and will go away quietly, and there will be peace. They will be rudely surprised. Once the Muhammad cartoonists are all safely dead or drawing “Islam is peace” floral bouquets, the jihadis will make new demands. And then the Ingrahams and O’Reillys and van Susterens and MacCallums will jump to obey again.

“Muhammad Cartoon Contest Winner Retreats Into Hiding,” By Nathan Koppel, Wall Street Journal, May 5, 2015 (thanks to Pamela Geller):

As authorities continue to investigate an attempted attack on a contest to draw the Prophet Muhammad in Texas on Sunday, the winner of the event has retreated into hiding, saying he faces persistent death threats.

Bosch Fawstin netted $12,500 for winning the contest’s grand prize as well as the “People’s Choice Award” for his drawing depicting Muhammad wielding a sword and saying, “you can’t draw me!”

In an interview on Tuesday, the cartoonist was vague about his whereabouts, saying only that he lives somewhere in the U.S.

muhammed-sword-winner“I don’t want to say where,” Mr. Fawstin said, also declining to say his age. “There are Muslims out there who want to kill me.”

Mr. Fawstin said he was raised by Albanian Muslim parents in the Bronx but eventually renounced his faith. He said the 9/11 terrorist attacks motivated him to use his art to denounce Islamic extremism.

He has drawn a comic book called “Pigman,” featuring a hero who battles “pigotry” and his arch nemesis, SuperJihad. He said he has also drawn several dozen cartoon renderings of the Islamic prophet.

“I do it because we have been told we can’t,” he said. “I’m not just provoking people for the hell of it.…Provocation is freedom of speech—it’s not separate from it.”

The Muhammad art competition in Garland, Texas, was hosted by the American Freedom Defense Initiative. Some 200 people attended the event according to a participant.

Pamela Geller, the group’s president, said the competition was a way to promote free speech and was a response to a January attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo by Islamic extremists that killed 12 people, including some of the publication’s most famous cartoonists. Critics of the group claim it promotes extreme, anti-Islamic views.

Armed with assault rifles and wearing protective body gear, two men opened fire outside the community center in Garland but were quickly gunned down by law enforcement.

Days before the shooting, the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigation sent a joint bulletin to law-enforcement agencies, warning that while authorities didn’t know of any specific threats tied to the contest, they were concerned that it could “prompt violent extremist reaction”.

The bulletin said authorities were especially concerned about acts targeting contest participants, who may not understand the degree to which they could be in danger, in the days and weeks following the event.

Mr. Fawstin said he will likely have to remain incognito for the foreseeable future. “I’ve been called a hermit since a kid,” he said. “I’m used to being on my own.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Featured, free speech, Muhammad cartoons Tagged With: Bosch Fawstin


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. John C. Barile says

    May 6, 2015 at 7:22 am

    I’m with you in spirit, Bosch.

  2. Rev. Albert W. Kovacs - UCC says

    May 6, 2015 at 7:30 am

    That an innocent citizen should have to go into hiding in America is a pathetic commentary on America, the land of the free. Crooks go into hiding in normal times, but this is the Obama era and his legacy of a land racked by polarization, violence and fear.

  3. milad meah says

    May 6, 2015 at 7:32 am

    Bosch Fawstin goes into hiding:
    when will the West come to terms with what Sir Winston Churchill had said.
    An appeaser is the one who thinks the crocodile will eat him last.
    Milad

    • wallace says

      May 7, 2015 at 8:21 am

      Hi milad mea, i think the west has come to terms with what Winston Churchill said, as evidenced by the arrest of Paul Weston leader of Liberty GB, Mr Weston found himself under arrest for quoting Churchill in public. I know who gets my vote in todays election.

  4. duh_swami says

    May 6, 2015 at 7:37 am

    ‘Living in fear of ‘The Religion of Peace’…The Movie…Coming to a theaters near you soon…

    ‘#Freedom fighters lives matter’…If you don’t believe that, I would be happy to explain it to you in person…

    The problem with FOX is they are a little ‘too fair and balanced’…

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      May 6, 2015 at 9:05 am

      It is notable that Fox RINO and the WSJ are both owned by News Corp, which in turn is owned by the Aussie Rupert Murdoch with a significant minority share owned by Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal.

      Now, I don’t know whether Alwaleed gave money to Osama (not Obama) during his fundraising drive in Riyadh for the 9/11 project, but I do know that he openly comlained to Fox RINO for what he felt was heavy handed linkage between Moslems and terrorism.

      The WSJ would like Fawstin to go into hiding to teach everybody a lesson about pulling reckless publicity stunts when it comes to Moslems, who are sensitive people very serious about their religion. The Journal knows about hiding: it has supported letting tens of millions of people into this country illegally to keep a lid on the cost of labor, which in the short term is clearly good for business. But they’ve kept hidden THE FACT that not enforcing the law to enforce the border to maintain the nation’s integrity is in fact illegal, as in unconstitutional. Now, they want to give them citizenship as a reward for their crime. Also kept hidden by the WSJ is that we have the option to deport the illegals and bring in substitute native meso-Americans. Another hidden thing is that there is no race gene pool for Hispanics, that term is a catchall salve to imbue those descended from the Azteks and Mayans with the cachet of Barcelona or Madrid, like with that crazy good looking white guy Marco Rubio… who supports the immoral act of rewarding criminals with citizenship.

  5. Tom Cherian Mullammootil says

    May 6, 2015 at 7:45 am

    It is HIGH time USA have an organization to defend it’s citizens from muslim barbarians. I doubt the government will ever step up.

    It is HIGH time an organization like RSS/VHP in India spring up in USA and EU to defend Western Civilization.

    Peace,
    Brown Skinned Immigrant

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      May 6, 2015 at 9:49 am

      It is HIGH time USA have an organization to defend it’s citizens from muslim barbarians.

      We already have one, it’s called the U.S. government. But, unfortunately, it declines to do its job as defined by its guiding law the U.S. Constitution. It declines because that would cross newly invented barriers in the form of multicultural sensitivity, a cultural artifact that trumps even the law. The former is heard on the TV, the latter is heard in court, a suspect venue the last half century.

    • gravenimage says

      May 6, 2015 at 7:52 pm

      It’s hard to know how to regard the RSS/VHP. They’ve been involved in forced reconversions of Christians to Hinduism, and they have beaten women who refused to reconvert. They condone anti-Christian violence. It is also notable that they haven’t touched converts to Islam—likely because Muslims would be even more violent in return, unlike Christians.

      Seeing this as defending Indian culture seems pretty equivocal.

      • Tom Davis says

        May 7, 2015 at 1:49 am

        The RSS paramilitaries and other Sangh Parivar groups HAVE gone after Muslims, but I agree, it is the Christians they see as the low hanging fruit. These Sangh groups are just as supremacist as Islam is. They just banned the possession and sale of beef in Maharashtra state and put 14 million Muslims out of work along with a few million Christian Dalits. We all know that poverty does not equal jihad – the leader of the al-Shabab attack on Garissa University College in Kenya last month was a Kenyan law school student, for example – but this may prove to be the great exception. No, Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller have the right approach.

  6. Mo says

    May 6, 2015 at 10:54 am

    Here is my exchange with the author. I am shocked he responded to my email, and so quickly!

    My first email:

    (my full name/email)
    Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 9:36 AM
    To: Koppel, Nathan
    Subject: Story: Muhammad Cartoon Contest Winner Retreats Into Hiding

    Bosch Fawstin has not gone into hiding. (Below is a link to his Twitter page.) Please correct your story.

    Thank you.

    https://twitter.com/BoschFawstin/status/595762558939832321

    (full name)

    His response:

    Today at 9:41 AM
    By hiding, I meant that he does not want to disclose his physical location for fear of retribution — a point I think the article clear makes and that Bosch reiterated to me many times. Thank you,

    Nathan

    Nathan Koppel
    staff reporter, The Wall Street Journal
    512-342-8983 (office)
    (I’ve removed his cell phone number here, even though he did send it)
    nathan.koppel@wsj.com
    twitter: @nathankoppel

    My final response:

    To Koppel, Nathan Today at 9:49 AM

    Then I’m sure you will adjust your story, as you understand the importance of clarity of language.

    Thank you also for acknowledging that Islam is a violent ideology! I don’t know if they will, but I am hoping they will hold this contest next year. Perhaps we will see you standing alongside these brave people to defend our First Amendment right to free speech.

    Thank you for your time.

    (my full name)

    • Alarmed Pig Farmer says

      May 6, 2015 at 11:03 am

      I hope they hold another Holy Prophet cartoon contest next month. They’ll need to raise the cash to pay for the security to do that, the price will go up in light of what happened in Garland. More proof that terrorism works; more proof that our news entertainers work on behalf of terror. It’s all so terrible, this terror thing. But it’s great subject matter for selling TV ads and newspapers.

      If you think about it, terrorism is an industry. A growth industry. With ISIS one of the hottest high growth start ups since Microsoft and Apple 30 years ago.

      • RonaldB says

        May 6, 2015 at 1:31 pm

        I was at the exhibition. My ticket was $50. There were about 300 people attending. There is no way the price of admission covered the added security, let alone the award, hall rental, refreshments, and so on.

        The people attending had to stay cooped up for hours, escorted by police armed to the teeth with machine guns and camouflaged body armor. Who were supportive and magnificent.

        Everyone there, who I talked to, would attend the same exhibition if it were given tomorrow. If this is a fight, let’s get it on. I think Texans are a bit closer to the idea that fighting for liberty may actually have a price…and are more than willing to pay it. I know I’m making a broad generalization, but I just can’t see that type of audience in another state.

        I think it fair to say we need to revisit our thinking on immigration. Our formal immigration policies are actually pretty sensible
        http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/how-communist-totalitarian-party-membership-affects-eligibility-naturalized-us-citizenshi
        except they seem not to be followed by the lawless US administration.

        If we import a group of 10,000 Muslim immigrants, 99% of whom are non-violent, we have imported 100 people willing to kill or assassinate US citizens on their own to enforce sharia prohibitions. That puts people like Robert Spencer, Pam Geller, Bosch Fawstin, who stand out for their eloquence and effectiveness, at great risk. It also puts the Jewish community and the military at great risk.

        We have also imported 9,900 people who will politically support still more lax immigration standards, more Muslim “outreach” to schools and communities, and any legal impediments to free speech that can be engineered under the first amendment, such as “network neutrality”.

        In other words, you have to rigidly screen immigrants for not only adherence to non-violent methods, but for their adherence to American standards of freedom. It is an existential threat to our freedoms to permit someone to immigrate who is totally against violent change, but who supports constitutional amendments to abridge our rights and institute religion in government.

        I have absolutely no problem with dark-skinned Hindus from India. They should have the same standards applied to them, but my experience from working and socializing with them is that they are genuinely committed to living the American experience and more importantly, immersing their children in the American culture. Unlike the Muslims, they don’t build a wall around their children and systematically separate them from American culture. Muslim schools are more than obviously a means to prevent Muslim children from absorbing too much American culture.

        I don’t mean to be cruel, but an interview with the Muslim father of one of the girls who ran off to ISIS offered a very disturbing picture of a father totally against “radical” Islamic actions, but who totally controlled his daughter’s environment. In other words, he wanted her to totally adhere to Muslim cultural restrictions. In that environment, ISIS must have seemed like a breath of fresh air to her.

        Immigrants to America have always had conflicts with their children. It’s as American as apple pie. But, you didn’t have the covert violence that always underlies the Muslim family, the implied threat of force, especially against the female members. The worst that would happen previously is something like a Jewish family “sitting shiva” for a child who dropped religious observance,

        • terry says

          May 6, 2015 at 2:29 pm

          Simply brilliant, RonaldB! I agree 100% with what you said.

          I am against racism, all the way. Meanwhile ignoring the immense threat brought about by admitting hundreds of thousands of Muslims, every year in the west, is not only beyond stupid but self suicide.

          The fight against the threat of Islam’s faith system and Jihad is against an ideology not race.

        • gravenimage says

          May 6, 2015 at 7:57 pm

          Thanks for the view on the ground in Garland, Ronald. Kudos to you for attending. I wish I could have been there!

    • Tom Davis says

      May 7, 2015 at 1:56 am

      I suspect that Mr. Fawstin has always been careful about his personal security since he left Islam, and so I suspect that for the WSJ to write “gone into” would be incorrect, since probably nothing really changed for him.

  7. Former O'Reilly Fan says

    May 6, 2015 at 11:39 am

    The irony is that if jihadists will begin to kill their critics in the United States more often, Laura Ingraham, Bill O’Reilly, etc. who have criticized violent jihadist groups would likely to be among the first victims. Almost immediately after O’Reilly and his sock puppet Ingraham condemned Pamela Geller, the O’Reilly Factor had a segment that dealt with the rise of Isis. That, too, was very provocative to jihadists and put O’Reilly in the same position with Pamela Geller in the mind of a jihadist. Of course, O’Reilly does not have to agree with Pamela Geller, but trying to put the blame on her was very, very low from him. O’Reilly and others like him should understand that jihadists don’t care whether you make Muhammad caricatures or not. As long as you disagree with them on any issue you are their enemy no matter how “non-dumb” you counter jihadism is ..

  8. Stelnikov says

    May 6, 2015 at 12:14 pm

    “The bulletin said authorities were especially concerned about acts targeting contest participants, who may not understand the degree to which they could be in danger, in the days and weeks following the event.”

    Translation: You were brave to do this, now please panic as we have done and hide, hide, hide, from the follower of the Religion of Peace.

    Pathetic.

  9. wildflower says

    May 6, 2015 at 2:27 pm

    I despise wat Pamela and Robert write about the UK — DESPISE it and think they are vastly over exaggerating. But I respect what they are dong to wake people in the west, and warn them of the danger and attempting to protect our freedoms.

    • Judi says

      May 7, 2015 at 6:30 am

      They are not exaggerating. They report it like it is. Gd forbid Milliband wins today and it will be 100 times worse!!

    • Kathy Brown, Esq. says

      May 8, 2015 at 12:09 am

      I disagree with you on your first point. And guess what? I DON’T WANT TO KILL YOU!

      Shock and awe, right?

  10. Angemon says

    May 6, 2015 at 3:30 pm

    Critics of the group claim it promotes extreme, anti-Islamic views.

    I don’t know of anyone anywhere talking about moderate anti-islamic views. Never. What’s being implied here is that AFDI is as bad as the people who make it their life’s mission to kill anyone who refuses to abide by their rules. Why? Well, they’re both “extremists”, duh! And extremism is bad, mkay? Why, just the other day I went to the doctor complaining of a headache. He just told me to take an aspirin. I went to another doctor for a second opinion and he scheduled 37 different exams to rule out all possible scenarios. Both were “extremists” and no moderate in their behaviour, therefore both are equally bad, right?

    • gravenimage says

      May 6, 2015 at 8:03 pm

      You’re right about this false moral equivalence, Angemon.

  11. Elisha says

    May 6, 2015 at 7:58 pm

    In God, whose word I praise, In God I have put my trust; I shall not be afraid. What can mere man do to me? – Psalm 56:4

    • Joseph says

      May 7, 2015 at 10:41 am

      @ Elisha
      Right on!!! You CAN NOT threaten a Christian with death, you can only threaten him/her with eternal life.

      It isn’t much of a threat when you look at it that way.

  12. gravenimage says

    May 6, 2015 at 8:10 pm

    WSJ falsely claims AFDI/Jihad Watch Muhammad cartoon contest winner Bosch Fawstin goes into hiding
    …………………………………….

    Disgusting. It’s as though they want to emphasize that if you dare draw the “Prophet” that even if Mohammedans don’t murder you that it will ruin your life.

  13. Arthur says

    May 7, 2015 at 12:04 am

    Perhaps the WSJ would also like to mention that any apostate from Islam is considered a target for killing by any other Muslim? Since every apostate might well need to go “into hiding”, one should ask what is wrong with the religion that forces so many people “into hiding”?

  14. Arthur says

    May 7, 2015 at 12:07 am

    Next time, maybe just give the WSJ a ghost address in another state and request them to not publish it. When they do publish it, it will say quite a lot about the intentions of the media and would make an interesting basis for a letter to the editor.

  15. Roxane says

    May 7, 2015 at 12:09 am

    The problem that we have in this country is that there are people on the left including the completely corrupt MSM who hate some Americans much more then they hate terrorists.How else can you explain the response to the despicable conduct of Muslim terrorists. Killing people over cartoons. For how many decades have we been told that the first amendment is there to protect speech that offends. It should go without saying that if Muslims don’t like a cartoon they should ignore it the way every other group has been told to ignore insults by the left. Rush Limbaugh asked a good question shouldn’t these same leftists who think it wrong to draw a cartoon also stop supporting gay rights? Since we all know Muslims officially opposed gay sex. Except for the many Muslims who are on the down low. Of course many on the left are hypocrites and cowards and they are being exposed for all to see everyday.

  16. John Magne Trane says

    May 7, 2015 at 7:34 am

    “Critics of the group claim” = Supporters of the islamists claim

  17. Mannie says

    May 7, 2015 at 8:27 am

    Daesh has condemned Pamela Geller to death, along with anyone who harbors or aids her. They have issued death fatwahs against the Motoonists. They tried to murder them in the Texas Motoons (Not) Massacre.

    It is getting to the point where everyone MUST wear a Motoon T shirt, or an anti islamic slogan. They can’t murder us all.

    Μολὼν λαβέ

  18. John Horn says

    May 7, 2015 at 11:36 pm

    If offered, I’d buy a t-shirt with the winning cartoon. Expose it when I encounter Islamic folks walking around my town. 3XL. Preferably with a pocket.

    Assuming you don’t want to get into that business. Can I have permission to use the image and get it made myself?

    John

  19. Uncle Vladdi says

    May 8, 2015 at 12:05 am

    Bosch Fawstin was in hiding before this contest, and no doubt will remain so until islam is finally destroyed by being outed as the god-blaming extortion-racket crime gang that it always has been, still is, and always will be.

    Re: “Critics of the group claim it promotes extreme, anti-Islamic views.”

    So what?! I AM PROUD TO SAY: “I AM EXTREMELY ANTI-ISLAMIC!”

    And it’s because I am anti-crime in general. I wonder why Pam’s critics DON’T?

    In fact, I do hate crimes – and the criminals who commit them!

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • gravenimage on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • James Lincoln on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • revereridesagain on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.