• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

Egypt: TV presenter gets 5 years prison for blasphemy

May 31, 2015 9:04 pm By Robert Spencer

Islam-El-Behiry-sentenced-to-5-years-for-blasphemy-620x465This is part of the ongoing struggle in Egypt between the supporters of the imposition of Islamic law, who are still numerous, and the forces of secularism.

“TV presenter given 5 years imprisonment for blasphemy,” Daily News Egypt, May 31, 2015 (thanks to Blazing Cat Fur):

The Old Cairo Misdemeanour Court handed Saturday a five year prison sentence to TV presenter Islam El-Behiry for blasphemy.

A lawyer filed a lawsuit against El-Behiry, saying he led a campaign through his TV show to attack Muslim scholars and Islamic teachings’ textbooks.

El-Behiry has been hosting a programme that questions the teachings of Salafi preachers. In many of his episodes, he provides clips of famous and much respected Salafi preachers, and criticises their religious arguments.

The independent researcher also calls for disregarding ancient interpretations of the Qur’an and preaches individual understanding of the text.

Interpretations by prominent Muslim scholars dating back to the Middle Ages are considered manifestos to ultraconservative Salafi groups.

The Old Cairo Misdemeanour Court argued that El-Behiry has violated articles of the penal code, which sentences whoever insults or undermines Abrahamic religions to a maximum penalty of five years in prison.

Egypt’s most prominent Sunni institution and the highest government-controlled religious institution, Al-Azhar, had filed a complaint against El-Behiry, accusing him of “deliberately aiming to make people question their beliefs”.

Al-Azhar stated that it is concerned with the “vicious attacks by some media personnel against the basic values and heritage of Islam”.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: blasphemy, Egypt, Featured Tagged With: Islam El-Behiry


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Angemon says

    May 31, 2015 at 9:13 pm

    The Old Cairo Misdemeanour Court argued that El-Behiry has violated articles of the penal code, which sentences whoever insults or undermines Abrahamic religions to a maximum penalty of five years in prison.

    I wonder what’s the ratio of “non-muslims convicted of undermining/insulting islam” to “muslims convicted of undermining/insulting Christianity or Judaism”…

    • somehistory says

      May 31, 2015 at 9:42 pm

      Very good question. Here’s another question: what are the ” basic values ‘ of islam?
      We all know the “heritage”…it’s death and stolen property and lust and a lot of bloodshed and raping of children and young women.

      • Ren says

        May 31, 2015 at 10:35 pm

        Then islam sounds more like the mafia than a religion to me!

        • somehistory says

          Jun 1, 2015 at 1:08 pm

          islam taught the mafia all of its tactics of extortion and murder and lying.

      • Lia Wissing says

        Jun 1, 2015 at 4:47 am

        Only one basic value: submission.

        • somehistory says

          Jun 1, 2015 at 1:12 pm

          If one willingly submits, it might be of value, depending to what one is submitting.
          On the other hand, islam demands submission on pain of torture and death if one refuses.
          There is no value in islam. It is a beast of satan and he has no value, nothing to recommend him as one to be worshipped.

      • David says

        Jun 1, 2015 at 1:39 pm

        Exactly right, somehistory, that is their so called heritage. Murder, mayhem, carnage, chaos, poverty, rape, sodomy, etc. And this what they demand we respect.

    • Shane says

      Jun 1, 2015 at 10:04 am

      More proof that the idea of “moderate Muslims” is a freaking fairy tale. Any religious Muslim is intolerant, misogynistic, and violent.

      • David says

        Jun 1, 2015 at 1:41 pm

        You hit it on the head, Shane.

  2. Abu Obeida says

    May 31, 2015 at 9:33 pm

    He’s actually a reformist who tried to undermine the authenticity of Sahih Muslim and Sahih Bukhari, he wanted to help present a whitewashed version of Islam that promotes peace and tolerance and Muslims punished him for it.

    • Annak says

      May 31, 2015 at 9:44 pm

      So much for taqiyya” reformer” el-sisi’s Egypt then. Just as bad as under Morsi.

      • Daniel Triplett says

        Jun 1, 2015 at 9:07 am

        Yes, this would be a great time for El-Sisi to intervene. Nothing but crickets though.

  3. tilda says

    May 31, 2015 at 9:36 pm

    Exactly. And it might be time to reject the Abrahamic Fallacy; stop trying to pretend that the 3 religions all came out of the same stable.

    • Lia Wissing says

      Jun 1, 2015 at 4:49 am

      Only 2 from the same stable: Judaism & Christianity. The entire islam is a Mafia gang.

      • voegelinian says

        Jun 1, 2015 at 1:38 pm

        The hart of Israel and the donkey of the Gospels came from the same stable; the wolf of Islam came from the willd fields to attack them (only recently putting on sheep’s clothing to pretend to be another pastoral farm animal like them).

  4. Annak says

    May 31, 2015 at 9:41 pm

    So much for el-Sisi’s Egypt. Just as bad as under Morsi !

    • Angemon says

      Jun 1, 2015 at 7:17 am

      What were you expecting? That as soon as Sisi made his speech all muslims in Egypt thought to themselves “this guy is right, let’s do what he says”?

      • Annak says

        Jun 1, 2015 at 10:04 pm

        I expected nothing ! Unlike many in the West. I never trusted him and saw through his taqiyya. There are also reports he was in an gang with Morsi years ago. One and same from the same mould.

        • Angemon says

          Jun 2, 2015 at 6:28 am

          Not Morsi, Mubarak. Mubarak was the guy who was in power before Morsi. Mubarak was officially a supporter of the US until Obama saw fit to drop him in favour of his muslim brotherhood buddies.

  5. William Lucas Harvey Jr. says

    May 31, 2015 at 10:53 pm

    “Egypt: TV presenter gets 5 years prison for blasphemy”.

    Here we go AGAIN.

    Islam and Muslims ARE SO “Uptight” about ANYONE who even Appears to “Blaspheme” their “Cult” so called “Religion”, they want WORLD Wide “Blasphemy Laws”, with FORCED “Criminal Penalties”.

    Even though the so called “Blasphemy” is nothing more than EXPOSING the DOCUMENTED TRUTH about Islam, Allah, Mohammed, and the Qur’an – the “Cult” of HATE.

    Apparently – Islam and Muslims can’t take the TRUTH, so that’s why they attempt to “Deceive” the World with their “Grand Deception” of Taqyyia and Kitman, “Lying” – to advance the cause Islam by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.

  6. Grumpyoldguy says

    May 31, 2015 at 11:57 pm

    If you never question your beliefs, you’re probably wrong.

    More Muslims need to question the barbaric ideology they adhere to. Truth can often be painful, especially when all you know are lies. Islam is a lie that must be exposed.

  7. Gene says

    Jun 1, 2015 at 1:55 am

    I’m certain that moderate Islam will win out any minute now and Islam will become the peaceful and tolerant religion the left knows it is at heart. When it does, it will be one of the crowing achievements of the Obama administration.

  8. G. Gardiner. says

    Jun 1, 2015 at 3:48 am

    You’re certain? How can you be certain? Let me guess: a little voice in your head is telling you so.

    But I doubt it’ll be “any minute now.” More like 400 or 500 years I’d say. After all, it was in 1553 that John Calvin had Michael Servetus tortured and burned to death for a “crime” similar to El-Behiry’s.

    It takes a while for a religion to cool down, as it were.

    • Angemon says

      Jun 1, 2015 at 7:15 am

      G. Gardiner. posted:

      “But I doubt it’ll be “any minute now.” More like 400 or 500 years I’d say. After all, it was in 1553 that John Calvin had Michael Servetus tortured and burned to death for a “crime” similar to El-Behiry’s.

      It takes a while for a religion to cool down, as it were.”

      Staggering display of ignorance, Gardiner. Back in 1553, muslims would also have punished anyone for saying what this presenter said. So why did Christianity “cool down” while islam didn’t?

      *hint – look at their core texts*

      • Susan says

        Jun 1, 2015 at 8:19 am

        Good answer Angemon, I was going into attack mode, however you came through with the perfect response.

      • G. Gardiner. says

        Jun 1, 2015 at 11:40 am

        What ignorance am I displaying, Angemon?

        Christianity had a head-start on Islam, close on 700 years. Are you ignorant of the horrors the early Christians perpetrated? The Inquisition. Burning men alive because they dared to print the Bible in their vernacular. “Witch” burning. Centuries of deadly pogroms against the Jews. And that’s just a handful of horrors.

        Why did Christianity cool down? We call it the Enlightenment.

        Islam will have its own enlightenment, never fear. But as I suggested earlier, it won’t be anytime soon. Give it 4 to 5 centuries.

        • Susan says

          Jun 1, 2015 at 12:44 pm

          Islam has slaughtered 275,000,000 in trying to conquer the world until, thankfully, the Crusaders stopped these murderers. Read their book it clearly states that it is the duty of all muslims to kill the un-believers and dominate the world. Islam is not a religion but a political ideology similar to the nazis only 100 times worse. No where in the NT does Jesus command people to kill in his name. Jesus loves all including muslims.

        • G. Gardiner. says

          Jun 1, 2015 at 1:15 pm

          I did read the book, Susan. It bears a striking resemblance to the Bible and most other primitive writings.

          Have you dipped into the Book of Joshua lately? And that’s only one of many abominations.

          Listen, we’re on the same side here: we all agree that Islam is the greatest threat to the world at this time. But let’s not kid ourselves that Christianity is blameless. Nor is Judaism, or any other man-made religion for that matter. And of course they’re ALL man-made—invented by men who sought wealth, power and unlimited sex.

          Jesus? Wasn’t he the guy who invented hell and everlasting torment?

          What we need is the sort of clear-headed thinking that humanism brings.

        • somehistory says

          Jun 1, 2015 at 1:23 pm

          Susan,
          Your arguments and those of Angemon are sound and reasonable. Those are the reasons you won’t get through to G. Gardiner. He/she is only here to try to equate Christianity/Christians with islam. It’s a tactic to try to change the discussion and no amount of reason and fact will penetrate.

        • Angemon says

          Jun 1, 2015 at 1:30 pm

          G. Gardiner. posted:

          “What ignorance am I displaying, Angemon?”

          The idea that all religions teach the same and therefore will go through the same path and transformations.

          “Christianity had a head-start on Islam, close on 700 years. Are you ignorant of the horrors the early Christians perpetrated?”

          The early Christians – around the first three centuries of Christianity – were persecuted for their religion. The early muslims conquered the Middle East, north of Africa and parts of Europe less than 100 years after the invention of islam with a brutality, slaughter and bloodshed that would make the current islamic state look like boy scouts. The Roman Empire became Christian because most people converted out of their own free will, despite risking their lives. The aforementioned areas (Middle East, Northern Africa and parts of Europe) became muslim because non-muslims were persecuted, abused, vilified and subject to heavy taxation and the whims of their muslim rulers.

          “The Inquisition. Burning men alive because they dared to print the Bible in their vernacular. “Witch” burning. Centuries of deadly pogroms against the Jews. And that’s just a handful of horrors.”

          If you’re honest then you have to recognized that the islamic world has done that, if not worse during the same timespan. In fact, a case can be made – and in fact has been – that the doctrines you mention were imported from islamic culture. The inquisition only had influence over Christians. If whatever state you lived in allowed you to have any other religion then the inquisition couldn’t touch you. The first recorded pogroms on Jews in Europe were made by muslims. Like Granada, 1066, where a muslim ruler promoted a Jew to the position of vizir, and the response from the muslim population was to attack the jewish quarters and murder thousands of Jews, with the rallying cry of placing the Jews where they belonged – under islamic law, non-muslims aren’t allowed to have any dominion over muslims.

          If you took enough time to actually see what you’re writing, it can be summed up into “stop criticizing muslims for doing things we consider abhorrent because Christians did them too centuries ago”. Should we condone modern day slavery because our ancestors owned slaves centuries ago? Should we have children toiling the fields because that was the norm a few generations ago? No, of course not.

          “Why did Christianity cool down? We call it the Enlightenment.

          Islam will have its own enlightenment, never fear. But as I suggested earlier, it won’t be anytime soon. Give it 4 to 5 centuries.”

          First of all, I’d like to point out that we’re talking about religion. Not two trains leaving from station A to station B running at the same speed, with one of them leaving at 8 a.m. and the other leaving at 10 a.m., but religion. Religions have their tenets, and you can’t make a religion go against its tenets and claim it’s the same religion. The Enlightenment challenged the authority of institutions like the Church but it did not change the tenets of Christianity.

          Second, I’ll refer you to Raymond Ibrahim’s article on the subject:

          http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/05/raymond-ibrahim-islams-reformation-is-already-here-and-its-called-isis

          He sums it up nicely:

          “How Christianity and Islam can follow similar patterns of reform but with antithetical results rests in the fact that their scriptures are often antithetical to one another. This is the key point, and one admittedly unintelligible to postmodern, secular sensibilities, which tend to lump all religious scriptures together in a melting pot of relativism without bothering to evaluate the significance of their respective words and teachings.“

        • G. Gardiner. says

          Jun 1, 2015 at 2:32 pm

          I wrote: “What ignorance am I displaying, Angemon?”

          Angemon wrote: “The idea that all religions teach the same and therefore will go through the same path and transformations.”

          No, I wrote no such thing. Where did you get “same” from, a voice in your head? 🙂

          I’ll repeat what I intimated to Susan: that all of us on JihadWatch perceive the dangers presented by Islam.

          However, I see little point in combating woo with more woo. Rational thinking, science, humanism—the “weapons” of the 21st century—that’s how we fight the enemy, with his primitive mindset.

          So please, keep your silly gods to yourself. I outgrew such nonsense at age 13.

        • Angemon says

          Jun 1, 2015 at 3:16 pm

          G. Gardiner. posted:

          “I wrote: “What ignorance am I displaying, Angemon?”

          Angemon wrote: “The idea that all religions teach the same and therefore will go through the same path and transformations.”

          No, I wrote no such thing. Where did you get “same” from, a voice in your head? 🙂”

          Then you’re truly and certifiably insane, if you expect two religions with diametrically opposed tenets to go through the same processes and arrive at the same endpoint. “A voice in my head”, eh? A puerile reply from a puerile mind.

          Off-topic – I’m not the first person here you try to accuse of having voices in your head. What’s your fixation with it?

          “I’ll repeat what I intimated to Susan: that all of us on JihadWatch perceive the dangers presented by Islam.”

          And that is completely irrelevant to what you told me: that islam would go through a cool down period and have its own enlightenment in four or five centuries. It seems like you’re unable to raise any objections to the points I raised and you’re forced to
          retreat into wild accusations of voices in heads and red herrings.

          Have you read Raymond Ibrahim’s article? Do you agree or disagree when I say that islam and Christianity have diametrically opposed tenets?

          And since you’re bringing up what you told Susan, is the Book of Joshua supposed to be the role model for Christian behaviour? It seems to me yu’re one of those “enlightened”, “educated” fools who consider that all religions teach the same and that Christians can’t be allowed to criticize muslims murdering and raping nowadays because the Bible talks of murder and rape.

          “However, I see little point in combating woo with more woo.”

          Another red herring. I’m not suggesting to combat “woo” with more “woo”. I questioned your statements regarding islam “cooling down” in 4 or 5 centuries – statements for which you gave no explanation or any resemblance of sound logic.

          “So please, keep your silly gods to yourself.”

          What silly gods would those be? As I said, I called you out on your statement regarding the state of islam in 4 or 5 centuries. Whatever religious beliefs I happen to have bear no relevance on that subject – either you can give some sort of logic to back what you said or you can’t. And since you saw fit to claim I’m hearing voices and taking potshots at whatever religious beliefs I might happen to have (I’ve stated several times that I’m an atheist, BTW), you clearly can’t.

          “I outgrew such nonsense at age 13.”

          Whatever nonsense you outgrew at age 13 is dwarfed by whatever nonsense you believe now, which is manifested by your assertion that islam will “cool down” in 4 or 5 centuries. Your refusal to discuss what you said and instead engage in unwarranted, unjustified attacks makes you look like a zealot – you believe what you said so religiously (maybe you’ve heard voices in your head telling you that?) that you can’t stand anyone question it. Truly, if there’s anyone here acting like a zealot that would be you.

          My questions still stand: can you give an explanation to your theory that islam will cooldown 4 or 5 centuries away from now? Have you read Mr. Ibrahim’s article?

          For JW regulars reading this: remember that one guy who has been banned several times who always went on claiming that islam was bad and that we must fight islam but who spend his time here unfairly criticizing christianity and trying to equate it to islam? I believe G. Gardiner. is his latest iteration.

        • G. Gardiner. says

          Jun 1, 2015 at 3:46 pm

          Angemon wrote:

          ‘Then you’re truly and certifiably insane, if you expect two religions with diametrically opposed tenets to go through the same processes and arrive at the same endpoint. “A voice in my head”, eh? A puerile reply from a puerile mind.”‘

          There you go again with your use of “same”—your word not mine.

          Sorry, end of discussion as far as I’m concerned. I rarely condescend to waste time and mental energy on those whose sole recourse is the ad-hominem attack.

        • Angemon says

          Jun 1, 2015 at 4:00 pm

          G. Gardiner. posted:

          “There you go again with your use of “same”—your word not mine.”

          Ah, running away with your tail between your legs while excusing yourself with a technicality, eh? Fine then, I’ll humour your tragically sensible “atheistic” sensibility and amend what I wrote. Here’s what you said:

          “Why did Christianity cool down? We call it the Enlightenment.

          Islam will have its own enlightenment”

          Where it reads:

          “ if you expect two religions with diametrically opposed tenets to go through the same processes and arrive at the same endpoint.”

          it should read:

          “ if you expect a religion whose tenets are diametrically opposed to Christianity to have an enlightenment derived from Judaic-Christian culture as Christianity did, and “cool down” as Christianity did”

          Happy now? Not that I expect you to give any sort of explanation to your assertion in any case – you’re here to try to shame Christians into silence, not to discuss facts and ideas.

          “Sorry, end of discussion as far as I’m concerned. I rarely condescend to waste time and mental energy on those whose sole recourse is the ad-hominem attack.”

          Says the guy who accused others of having voices in their heads. But feel free to tell yourself that – you probably believe it. In any case, how can you “waste” what you seemingly don’t have (pro-tip – I’m not talking about time here)?

        • Angemon says

          Jun 1, 2015 at 4:07 pm

          P.S.:

          “Why did Christianity cool down? We call it the Enlightenment.

          Islam will have its own enlightenment, never fear.

          (…)

          There you go again with your use of “same”—your word not mine.”

          There is enlightenment and there is enlightenment. Enlightenment is not the same as enlightenment, but that’s only important when some says they are somehow similar. For the person making the comparison between enlightenment and enlightenment, and describing how two diametrically opposed religions will go through enlightenment – because, hey, one did, therefore the other will follow, no matter how different their tenets and the culture they breed are, right? – the difference between enlightenment and enlightenment is obvious, and anyone who dares even to suggest that enlightenment is the same as enlightenment is undoubtedly hearing voices in their head.

  9. R Cole says

    Jun 1, 2015 at 1:14 pm

    Here, the arguments about Islam would be the opposite. To successfully fulfill the vision of bringing the west under Islam – Muslims know, Islam has to be presented in a way that westerns understand religion and that is predominately Christian.

    To present Islam – Muslim spokespersons present Islam using strong Christian themes like ‘Love’ [almost devoid in Islam] and ‘peace’… to ensure that as many people feel comfortable with the idea. Even the enormously controversial sharia law – with its amputation and stoning laws – – can be passed off as this moderate Christianize version – so successful a marketing campaign – anyone who speaks out against it – is viewed being ‘unreasonable’ – and even stronger terms like ‘racism’ and the new term ‘Islamophobia’ are used to discourage real question.

    When we in the west – argue about Islam – we are challenging the validity of the well-presented version. But in the Islamic world the opposite is truth – what causes Islamic offense there – is not to argue against Islam’s moderate portrayal – but to challenge the validity of the more fundamentalist, coercive and violent version.

    Will the Real Islam Stand Up

    And it goes to the point as to why we absolutely need to maintain freedom of speech around these religious issues.

    This Egyptian journalist suggestion that if you take away some of the old harsher interpretations – Islam could be practiced with less hostility – landed him in jail. And if freedom of speech was not protected in the west – in the current environment – anyone could be jailed – for saying, that Muslim Islamists [political action for an Islamic state] or terrorist [violent action for an Islamic state] actions are not randomly selected – verses from the Koran and Hadiths are used as inspiration and justification.

    ::

    Jailing Islam’s Reformers

    The fact that the man was jailed for the promotion of a more reformed version of Islam – in so-called moderate Egypt – doesn’t bode well. And lets us know how little this moderate version of Islam is believed in or respected outside of the TV interviews where these coiffured Islamic spokespersons appear.

    Tactical Islam

    And further demonstrates that – the way Islam is presented – is directly related to its advantage.

    Clearly there is no need for pretense in the Islamic world – but until you make inroads – the popular fundamentalist version is best concealed.

  10. Westman says

    Jun 1, 2015 at 1:23 pm

    This poor fellow got 5 years for moderation. Since CAIR and US Muslim spokespersons tell the world that they represent “moderate” Islam, perhaps they could show how they are accepted by mainstream Muslims in SA, UAE, Egypt, Pakistan, Iran, etc.

    There are Christian groups who sponsor and bear costs of helping Jews emmigrate to Israel, a land of their heritage, with much success.

    We should propose the founding of a new organization to help moderate Muslims repatriate to the countries of their heritage. It could be called the Moderate Muslim Repatriation Fund, the MMRP. The organization would arrange and pay for travel to their “moderate” heritage homeland. If there are few takers, then one could only assume the moderation of which CAIR speaks must not be mainstream beliefs.

    Muslims are the only refugees to the West who disrespect the privileges, rights, and material assistance they receive, lie when giving the pledges of allegiance, and have a long term seditious goal of overthrowing those Western nations and instituting Sharia.

    The only detectible difference between the Fundametalists and the “Moderates” is the speed at which they operate.

  11. jwm says

    Jun 1, 2015 at 11:46 pm

    this idiot should have known not to do what Neil deGrasse Tyson does

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • James Lincoln on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • Carol on Greece, Cyprus, Egypt, France and UAE conduct joint military exercises amid rising Turkish threat
  • James Lincoln on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe
  • Jayme on Canadian Mental Health Association studies Muslim women’s mental health due to ‘discrimination’ and ‘hate crimes’
  • GreekEmpress on EU Parliament members call for firing of border agency director for preventing illegal migrants from entering Europe

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.