Richard Brennan, a Senior Political Scientist at RAND, says: “There is no way to square these things – forcing people to be slaves and raping them – with the Koran. It’s not Islamic, so they have to lie about that to make it fit the narrative.”
The seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must (eventually) win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess, for (in their case) they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)
The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Muslim 3371)
It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)
The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:
Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.
When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.
Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.
A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”
The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”
“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.
“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”
The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction.
“‘I rejoiced when we had our first sex slave, forced sex ISN’T rape and they should be thankful’: Chilling rant of twisted ISIS jihadi bride who justifies kidnapping and abusing Yazidi girls,” by Jay Akbar, Mailonline, May 22, 2015:
ISIS has released a chilling document in which it justifies the kidnapping and rape of slave girls – and brands Michelle Obama a prostitute whose ‘price won’t even exceed a third of a dinar’.
These shocking admissions are made by a jihadi bride in the ninth edition of its propaganda magazine Dabiq, in a feature entitled: ‘Slave girls or prostitutes.’
For years Islamic State has been enslaving and sexually abusing the women it captures – particularly from Iraq’s minority Yazidi community – and sending the ‘prettiest virgins’ to depraved auctions, a United Nations envoy claimed this week.
ISIS has not only confirmed this to be true, but the terror group justifies the cruel sex crimes as Sunnah, which roughly translates as ‘a way of life’.
A counter-terrorism expert told MailOnline that this was another example of how ISIS is twisting the holy text to recruit young male fighters – who often can’t get wives in their own countries – by telling them their spoils of war will be women.
The hate-filled rant is penned by a suspected jihadi bride named Umm Sumayyah Al-Muhajirah, who called for her ‘sisters’ to emigrate to Syria and become wives to Islamic State extremists in the previous edition of Dabiq.
During her latest despicable five-page article, she even describes the First Lady of the United States as a prostitute.
Saying: ‘Who knows, maybe Michelle Obama’s price won’t even exceed a third of a dinar, and a third of a dinar is too much for her!’
And she openly admits that ISIS has plundered villages and kidnapped women, saying: ‘As for the slave-girl that was taken by the swords of men following the cheerful warrior then her enslavement is in opposition to human rights and copulation with her is rape?!
‘What is wrong with you? How do you make such a judgment? What is your religion? What is your law? Rather, tell me who is your lord?’
‘Allah has opened the lands for His awliya [supporter], so they entered and dispersed within the lands, killing the fighters of the kuffar [non-believer], capturing their women, and enslaving their children.’
She angrily adds: ‘I write this while the letters drip of pride… We have indeed raided and captured the kafirah women, and drove them like sheep by the edge of the sword.’
Sumayyah Al-Muhajirah expresses deep disappointment to Islamic State fanatics who refuted the mass kidnappings of Yazidi girls, saying: ‘So the supporters started denying the matter as if the soldiers of the Khilafah [Caliphate] had committed a mistake or evil.’
The maniacal jihadi bride claims in Dabiq that slave girls were ‘turned into hard-working, diligent seekers of knowledge after she found in Islam what she couldn’t in Kuffar [non-believer], despite the slogans of “freedom” and “equality”.
‘Indeed it is our pure Islam, which upraises every lowly-one and puts an end to every deficiency. I and those with me at home prostrated to Allah in gratitude on the day the first slave-girl entered our home.’
ISIS has carried out ‘systematic sexual crimes’ against Yazidi women and girls, having captured hundreds of them from northern Iraq over the last two years, Human Rights Watch has said.
In early April, more than 200 Yazidi women, children and elderly were released near Kirkuk after being taken hostage by Islamic State extremists last June.
Aid workers reported that among them was a pregnant nine-year-old girl who suffered horrific sexual abuse at the hands of ISIS militants in northern Iraq – and claimed to have been ‘sexually abused by no fewer than ten men’.
Al-Muhajirah shockingly claims these women who ‘claimed to have run away from Islamic State, made up lies, and wrote false stories’.
Adding: ‘Whoever has read history and studied the Sirah [biographies of the Prophet Muhammad] knows that throughout the times there were devious and wicked slave-girls with stories that would turn a newborn’s hair grey.
‘We’re kind to them and we don’t force them to convert. Yes, this is our – as they allege – ‘savage’ Islam, ordering us with kindness even towards slaves.
I swear by Allah, I haven’t heard of nor seen anyone in the Islamic State who coerced his slave-girl to accept Islam… On the contrary, I saw all of those who accepted Islam had done so voluntarily, not against their will.
By attributing the article to a woman, Islamic State is trying to reach out to women as well as young men, a Senior Political Scientist at counter-terrorism think-tank RAND told MailOnline.
Richard Brennan added: ‘Because you’ve got a female writing that, one of the things they are desperately trying to do is to get foreign women to be wives of the foreign fighters.
‘But what happens when people get there is massive disillusionment because the external propaganda they’re using to recruit is not the reality on the ground – and many try to escape.
‘They have done an extremely good job of tainting what it is to be a Muslim. They’ve taken very specific verses of the Koran and used it to create their own narrative of what Islam should be.
Brennan says Al-Muharijah’s twisted claims that they take care of slaves and do not force them to convert are lies.
Adding: ‘The reason we know they are lies is because there is no way to square these things – forcing people to be slaves and raping them – with the Koran. It’s not Islamic, so they have to lie about that to make it fit the narrative.’
ISIS is sending the ‘prettiest virgins’ they capture to slave markets in the Syrian city of Raqqa, United Nation’s Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict claimed this week.
Zainab Bangura claims that after ISIS attack their villages, they strip the girls naked, conduct virginity tests, evaluate their bodies and send them to slave auctions where they are sold as sex objects to the highest bidder.
She discovered the gruesome extent of Islamic State’s sexual crimes against young women – particularly from Iraq’s Yazidi minority community – after collecting information from Syria, Iraq, Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan.
somehistory says
How evil! The pit awaits those who do these things and they will wish they had never been born
The woman who would see another, or a young girl, raped just once and feel *glad* is a demon in human form. The woman who would *rejoice* when seeing young girls, children, raped repeatedly…is the devil in disguise…and the disguise has slipped totally away.
nicu says
These women are not poor oppressed creatures anymore – they are as bad as their men ! We see how they act in our streets !
mortimer says
Islamic Stockholm syndrome causes the women to kiss the whip that flogs them.
Shane says
This is similar to children of abusive parents who then become abusers themselves. It is a vicious cycle of abuse.
Mirren10 says
What nonsense.
Do you think Lewthwaite is suffering from ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ ?
In any case, I’ve always been extremely sceptical about this ‘Stockholm Syndrome’. I believe it was first used in reference to Patty Hearst, who supposedly embraced her SLA captor’s agenda, because she was beaten down by their treatment of her, and saw no other way out.
No-one ever seems to have considered the possibility she embraced it because she *liked* it.
Mirren10 says
Shane says:
”This is similar to children of abusive parents who then become abusers themselves. It is a vicious cycle of abuse”
Again, nonsense. There are **many** children who have been abused who do **not** go on to become abusers themselves.
It comes down to **choice**. What you are saying is that human beings are hapless victims of whatever vileness has been perpetrated against them, and they have no free will, but are merely puppets who act out horrors that have been done to them, because they can’t help it. Utter pernicious rubbish.
We must never, ever, blame *anyone* for what they do, because it was always someone else’s fault. This is the mantra of the ‘progressive left’, and is, and has always been, utter crap.
Linda Rivera says
Mirren 10, It is correct to say that those who have been abused DO NOT as a result of being abused, become abusers. Haters who CHOOSE to abuse do so out of choice.
On another note,
Patti Hearst was kept in a closet. She was starved and became emaciated; physically abused and constantly sexually abused. I’m DISGUSTED that you suggest that she liked it. She did NOT embrace the violent, filthy SLA satanic beliefs. She was a true victim. It is a heartbreaking thing when victims who lived through hell are slandered
Mirren10 says
”Patti Hearst was kept in a closet. She was starved and became emaciated; physically abused and constantly sexually abused. I’m DISGUSTED that you suggest that she liked it.”
I didn’t suggest that she liked being abused. What I said was that it was a *possibility* that she came to agree with, and liked, the SLA *agenda*. If you’re going to quote me, then quote me correctly, sweetipud.
Gary says
I remember viewing a video where women, (NO- Young girls!), were pleading for the U.S. to bomb there location.
Why…?
They were being repeatedly raped by I.S.I.S. Punks.
Yet the muslim world remains silent?
“Religion of Peace” my Ass!
Complacent
sahani says
USA had slave business and we had civil war to stop this many died.
German tried to killjoys and alienated and destroyed Germany.
ISLAM last 1400 yrs is committing all kind of human , slave , drugs , killing of all infidel forceful conversion,rapes etc crimes and no one talks about this ever no unity to stop this till today.
mortimer says
Sahani, The ‘unity’ or consensus is coming. The rape and enslavement by ISIS is forcing Feminists finally to choose the right side. They can’t pretend anymore that they don’t see it.
Feminists have to stop kidding themselves and finally admit that Islam is evil towards women and the most misogynistic force on earth.
nicu says
Absolutely . Sometimes I think Islam is a manly thing and that’s why nobody is interested to stop them : it’s only about women and children ( and animals ) – who cares ?
What a shame in the 21st century !
Michael Warden says
In 1862, President Lincoln offered slave owners in the Confederacy the option of keeping their slaves under his Emancipation Bill if only they would drop the idea of secession – the offer to expire on 1st January 1863. The offer was rejected – or ignored – and later that year Gettysberg was fought effectively ending the military capability of the South to eventually win. Your Civil War was NOT fought to end slavery. Romantic thought but Lincoln was a pragmatist whose main objective was to keep the Union intact. He was not – obviously – universally liked, and the shout of John Wilkes Booth : ” Sic semper Tyrannis ” echoed the alleged words of Brutus at the assassination of Caesar.
It is an urban myth that a reporter asked Mrs. Lincoln : ” Apart from that Mrs. Lincoln, what did you think of the play ? “.
Beatix says
January 31, 1865, the 13th Amendment abolished slavery.
The remark supposedly made to Ms. Lincoln was never meant to be taken seriously. It was an example of dark humor.
TruthWFree says
What is your point? There were many who wanted slavery to end in the north. The south seceded because Lincoln got elected and they knew he was against slavery and feared for their evil institution of slavery. I agree the offer to come back into the Union was made to preserve the Union, but the underlying cause of the Civil War was the divide on slavery and slave states losing their political ability to remain slave states in the longer term. They saw the hand writing on the wall and knew that slavery was doomed if they did not secede.
There is nothing in Christianity that allows one to sexually take or rape a slave as in Islam, Satan’s religion. Read St. Paul’s letter to Philemon where he pleads for Onesimus to treat him as a brother in Christ. There is no comparison of Christianity verses Islam treatment of slaves. It is the Christian societies that eventually abolished slavery…not so in Islamic societies.
voegelinian says
John Wilkes Booth’s father was an eccentric crank & loon who admired the Koran among other New Agey multi-cultural “wisdom” of the East.
Mirren10 says
”Your Civil War was NOT fought to end slavery”
Nevertheless, it did end it. Many political decisions, not taken for any *decent* reason, sometimes have the paradoxical effect of doing a good which was never actually deliberately intended.
Besides, there was a strong movement in the North, to end slavery, because it was seen as utterly immoral and evil. Are you saying this had no effect whatsoever, on political thinking? I would strongly doubt that.
Peter Buckley says
“ISIS has not only confirmed this to be true, but the terror group justifies the cruel sex crimes as Sunnah, which roughly translates as ‘a way of life’.” More specifically, Muhammad’s way of life.
Yes. Islam is well and truly “outing” itself for all the world to see. No decent human being who has been brought up in the Islamic faith will want to associate with this. Mass apostasy happening with every story told. Islam is collapsing. All you have to do is show “moderate” muslims that IS are doing nothing “Unislamic”, and the game’s up.
Oddly enough, I’ve just been watching a video , in which Imam Rauf, and Maajid Nawaz are being “advised” by Ayaan Hirsi Ali on how to “reform” Islam. This is extremely humiliating for devout followers who truly believe Islam is “the one true faith” and the “perfect word of God”. If that is the case, why are two leading spokesmen for the faith PUBLICLY admitting that there are a few “problems” with it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2prB3weT4c
Note also around 1hr 16 mins that Majid Nawaz admits to large numbers leaving the faith. I know there are many on here who think that Islam is “winning”- in fact it’s losing big time.
No Fear says
Reforming Islam, how? Islam has already had a reformation and “returned to its roots”. It is called Salafism. Thank Dawkins that most muslims do NOT behave like Mohammed.
Demsci says
Of course you make good points, to which I agree, but what about the slim possibility of …
An ‘Offshoot of Islam”? The difference is that that is not “reformation”, only a “slightly different interpretation of Quran-Hadiths-Sira”.
I bought Ayaan’s new book, am reading it now. I see the rise of ISIS and think it is confusing smart Muslims a lot.
And I keep thinking that somehow it is crucial to “convert’ Muslims, especially those in the West, to some “positive alternative to Islam”, or an “off-shoot” of Islam; “democratic Islam”.
Bright minds and computers can find what it is that appeals to the mind of “western Muslims”, exposed to education, abundance, consumerism. Superb minds and computers MAY yet find a “formula”, a positive alternative to Islam, or “an off-shoot of Islam” that appeals to many or enough of “smart Western Muslims”.
Let some of us, especially the Israeli’s, surrounded as they are by a”sea of traditional Muslims”, at least TRY to “convert enough smart Muslims”. To meaningful alternatives of Islam. When successful, THESE will cause much fear among Muslim stakeholders.
Dreaming off.
TheBuffster says
I haven’t read Hirsi Ali’s new book yet, but I don’t see the point in trying to create a new version of Islam. The Koran and the life of Mohammad are what they are.
The kind of people who go for “purity” will always have the foundational books to encourage them to jihad and the other abominations of Islam. The kind of people who are more reasonable and benevolent will always tend to modify their religious beliefs to accord with a more humane and thoughtful world view. Or they’ll break with their religion altogether for a guidance system that makes more sense to them.
My husband and I are going to read “Heretic” after we finish what we’re reading now. Maybe she has something to say that will change my mind, but I’m highly sceptical.
mortimer says
No compromise or improvement can be made in Islam. To do so would be to admit that it is not ‘eternal, perfect and complete’.
A Muslim who suggests an innovation in Islam (bida) is called a deviant. If the deviant repents, he is not executed. Reformists won’t live long. So much for reform.
Islam has no Golden Rule, no internal coherence, no early Koran, no history before 715 AD and no archeological support. Islam was concocted by the 8th century caliphs.
Islam is so morally flawed and covered in human fingerprints that it has no value to anyone. The evidence shows that Islam is racially supremacist, misogynistic, intolerant and the equivalent of fire-starter in politics. The purpose of Islam is the emolument and empowerment of Arabs through conquest. Such a political creed is an accident waiting to happen…not if, but when.
1400 years of this fake religion is enough. Expose it. Deprogram Muslims.
voegelinian says
An open mind on general principle is a good thing; but about some things, the more reasonable and prudent thing to do is adopt a closed mind. Example: the prospect of an “Islamic reform” in numbers and influence large enough to solve the problem of Islam.
There is no evidence for such a reform — only a tissue of hope, benefit of the doubt, Wilsonian vision, and varying degrees of PC MC. With someone like Hirsi Ali, we may reasonably include to the tissue of this pretty scarf we are weaving some psycho-cultural residues of the effects of Islam on her mind. This tissue has no evidence to back it up: it only makes an inductive inference based on the same data we more grimly pessimistic realists use: that bloody, smoking, fiery mountain of data — or rather volcano of data — which the Muslim world keeps churning out; a volcano that is getting worse, not better. Sure, on this same mountain of data there appear verdant slopes of green — multitudes of Muslims Who Just Wanna Have a Sandwich grazing seemingly peacefully, and here and there among them cunning wolves disguised as Moderate Shepherds (e.g., Maajid Nawaz); but is it asking too much that at least this tiny, beleaguered, rag-tag group of people otherwise known as “the Counter-Jihad” adopt a robustly jaded posture with regard to the ostensibly hopeful green slopes, flowers & snow that is supposed to distract us from the bloody, raging, fiery volcano as plain as the noses on our faces?
voegelinian says
P.S. to my post above:
I.e., there is no need to read Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s book in order to conclude that she is dead wrong about Islamic reform. The Counter-Jihad should adopt as a matter of principle carved in stone that an Islamic reform is not only impossible, it is an idea actually indirectly enabling the stealth jihad.
tilda says
“Islam is well and truly “outing” itself”
I like that… ‘Islam out of the closet.”
Spot on.
voegelinian says
Sure; but, to use another metaphor, Islam is the naked Emperor parading around buck-naked with his massively wee willie hanging out and swinging left to right and bobbing up and down — yet virtually the entire West continues to insist that the “Emperor Has Clothes On”.
Phil says
They will appear triumphant for a brief time and then they will fall. C’mon, they’re only making progress because of their foreign legion. That isn’t going to last. The people smuggling income is about to go west too and eventually their supply of weapons and munitions will dry up eventually.
Greyhound Fancier says
I saw a document that an anti-jihad group in Tennessee claimed that they’d found by accident, which they had translated from Arabic. It was an ISIS price list for female slaves, and the prices were highest for infants under one year, and the price was less for a child, less for a teenager, and so on. A woman my age would be less than zero, I suppose.
The prices were set because slaves were being sold at cheap prices, thereby not producing the income that ISIS desired. Anyone selling a slave for less than the listed prices was subject to punishment.
The most disgusting thing is the infant slaves. They can’t do any work. The only possible use for them is sex.
J M Joyce says
Anyone care to try to correct Mr Brennan’s weird misunderstanding of Islam and Shariah? You can email him at Rick_Brennan@rand.org .
Bassam says
Of course!!! The Quran is definitely the book of the dirtiest crimes. Quran translation improves so much of the original words and meanings of its laws, but even when you hear the clear words in Arabic the so called Muslim Learned men (scholars) try to deny and lie about the meanings to their naive ordinary Muslims. Quran and Muslim leaders are criminals and liars of the utmost disgust.
Jack Diamond says
I think your average ordinary mujahideen understands that there is more in it (jihad) for him than just virgins in Paradise and that it is not “twisting the holy text” to understand Spoils of War (an entire sura of the Qur’an) includes women. It can be proven instantly that Richard Brennan knows nothing about what the Qur’an and the Example of Muhammad say about slaves or “right-hand possession” captives of war and having sex with them (why, Muhammad even allowed them to be raped in front of their husbands). The learned men of Islam may lie to the kuffar but any interested Muslim (or kuffar) can find out what the ulema teach about such matters:
“What is a right hand servant?
If Allaah enables the Muslim mujahideen to defeat kaafir enemies in war, then the men may be killed, ransomed, set free without ransom or enslaved. The choice between these four options is to be made by the ruler, according to what he thinks is the best course.
With regard to the women, they become slaves and “those whom one’s right hand possesses” (described as a “right hand servant” in the question). Male children also become slaves. The ruler shares out these slaves among the mujaahideen.
Islam treated female slaves more kindly in their enslavement than other cultures did. Their honour was not considered to be permissible to anyone by way of prostitution, which was the fate of female prisoners of war in most cases. Rather Islam made them the property of their masters alone, and forbade anyone else to also have intercourse with them.”
http://islamqa.info/en/12562
>What a mercy Islam is to the female captive, allowing only her owner to rape her. But at least she is not prostituted! Well, not in so many words…”if a mujaahid takes possession of a female slave or male slave, it is permissible for him to sell them.” What reply can Richard Brennan possibly make to this plain statement of Islamic fact, forcing people to be slaves and raping them is sanctioned by the most learned of Muslims, by the consensus of scholars? Because it is based on what Muhammad said and did. Because it is sanctioned in the Qur’an. Because this has been normative Muslim behavior for fourteen sorry centuries. Richard Brennan has done an extremely good job tainting what it is to be a “counter-terrorism expert”. A thought-less think tank, now there’s an idea.
Karen says
Umm Sumayyah Al-Muhajirah; I hope this name is remembered. Some day there will be a war-crimes tribunal over ISIS and it’s sickening rampage. Ms. Umm Sumayyah Al-Muhajirah may find it necessary to explain her part in these crimes. She may find herself in prison someday.
FYI, Ms. Umm Sumayyah Al-Muhajirah; slaves usually find that life is better when they try to please their master/mistress, and that they may live another day by doing so. Not surprising that a slave girl might convert, despite claims of “no compulsion in religion”. (Yeah, right, snicker.)
Angemon says
It seems this is too big to post whole, I’ll have to divide it on several posts :/
There is someone lying about islam to make it fit a narrative. It’s not the islamic state though.
Glad to see that the UN found time to criticize something islamic in between passing resolutions against Israel…
A more accurate translation would be “the way of life according to the quran and the example of muhammad”.
Whoever said that may be an expert on terrorism but it certainly knows nothing about islam.
And why can’t these young men get wives in their own countries? Well, I’m not a “counter-terrorism expert”, but I’ll go on a limb and say it might have something to do with men being able to marry up to four wives and keeping sex slaves. How can a 20-something years male find someone of marrying age if girls are being engaged at age six and married at age nine to men in their 50’s or 60’s?
tl;dr: it’s because of normative, orthodox islam.
As long as she’s not calling her “Obama’s baby mother”… She hates that because it’s “racist”.
In a sane world, yes, it is. In the islamic world, it’s sanctioned in the quran. So if allah said it was ok then it’s ok and therefore it’s not rape.
And friends and family wonder why I snap when talking about islam…
Allah said it, she believes it. Not even a drop of empathy for the suffering inflicted to other women.
Angemon says
part 2:
I seriously doubt they felt that way. It was probably a PR maneuver.
By which she means that the poor girls were abused until they caved in and “converted” to islam to stop their suffering.
That’s a curious expression, since islam claims that women are deficient.
I bet she did – the more time her husband spent with the poor slave girl, the less time he was spending with her…
Not according to islamic orthodoxy – according to islamic orthodoxy, what we, civilized folk, consider “horrific sexual crimes” is, in fact, muslims “enjoying what is right”.
celtic warriarcanada says
And the west with some exceptions,sits back and does nothing . After all it could never happen in our country . It.s just a small minority who practice this . And they are over in the Middle East ! Ya Right just ask all the young women in Britain who were RAPED By ASIAN MEN ! Let’s see now , were they Chinese? Vietnamese?, Thai ? Laos? , Filipino?, Indonesian? Ah! THEY WERE PAKISTANI MUSLIMS ! But how can this be when SECRETARY KERRY has told us its A BEAUTIFUL RELIGION , and PRIME MINISTER CAMERON AND PRESIDENT BUSH AND PRESIDENT OBAMA have told us it is a RELIGION OF PEACE ? And while their WIVES AND DAUGHTERS ENJOY THE SAFETY AND SECURITY OF THE WEST , THOUSANDS OF CHRISTIAN AND YAZIDI GIRLS AND WOMEN SOME AS YOUNG AS 6 are sold as sex slaves and child brides . AND THEN THERE ARE THE SICK FILTHY GUTLESS BRITISH BOBBIES AND SOCIAL WORKERS WHOSE GREATEST FEAR IS TO BE CALLED AN ISLAMIPHOBIC RACIST BIGOT ! OH WHAT A TERRIBLE STIGMA ! WHO COULD POSSIBLY LIVE WITH THIS ?
mortimer says
Chill, Celtic, No good is done by the rage. Give books about Islam to the politicians and leaders you know. They have to read it to believe it. Robert Spencer’s books are excellent.
celtic warriarcanada says
HAY MORTIMER : I KNOW YOU THINK YOU ARE A GREAT INTELLECTUAL AND YOU WANT EVERYONE TO THINK THAT ! I LOVE SPENCER AND GELLAR’ S BOOKS AND RESPECT THEM JUST AS MUCH AS YOU ! AND AS FAR AS I’M CONCERNED ANY RATIONAL HUMAN BEING WHO IS NOT ANGRY AT THE SEXUAL ABUSE OF YOUNG GIRLS IS NOT A MAN . P.S. ANGER IS NOT ALWAYS EVIL. IT IS A GOD GIVEN EMOTION AND IF USED AND CHANNELED IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION IT CAN BE A POSITIVE EMOTION . THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY RADICAL ISLAM WILL BE DEFEATED : IT IS CALLED WAR! AND IF I WAS YOUNGER I WOULD GO OVER AS VOLUNTEER. AND STILL MIGHT.
mortimer says
It isn’t modern warfare. All sides are savages committing atrocities. Go there. You’ll fit right in.
vickie says
celtic warriarcanada I for one love your anger!! NOW don’t just sit there, direct that anger!!. I fight every day on different forums, religious, political, etc. against Islam by telling people the truth.
I have seen a slow shift from, hey you are nuts, you are an islamophobe, not all Muslims are bad to hey there is really something wrong with Islam.
Every one find a forum, newspaper comment section any place where you can let people know about the evils of Islam.
voegelinian says
“radical Islam”…? How about you lower your caps & dial down your braggadocio, and actually dial UP the object of your otherwise justified anger — to Islam and all Muslims who enable Islam?
I’ve noticed time and time again how more often than not it’s the ones with the show of chest-thumping braggadocio (“Why, if I got my hands on that Muzzie…!”) who actually hedge their bets about the nature of the problem; and one usually detects the telltale signs of asymptotic retention of the TMOE meme (Tiny Minority of Extremists), where the “Tiny” has been revamped and spiffed up and given a dash of aftershave cologne to make it seem more robust.
mortimer says
Richard Brennan, a Senior Political Scientist at RAND…has not read nor understood Sharia law. That is shocking and shameful…extremely shameful.
Can’t RAND do better than this?
Get someone with a knowledge of Sharia law.
mortimer says
A huge percentage of Sharia law about SLAVERY is in the Arabic, but not the English text. You would think a RAND researcher would be informed about Sharia.
RAND needs someone who is well-acquainted with the Islamic source texts, rather than someone who prefers to guess.
mortimer says
Zainab Bangura gets top marks with me. We need another 10,000 women with her ability to communicate the evil of ISIS and Islam.
voegelinian says
“As a devoted Muslim, Mrs. Bangura took time off politics in 2009 to travel to the Holy city of Mecca in Saudi Arabia to participate in the 2009 Hajj pilgrimage ceremony.”
Bangura is only against the Tiny Minority of Extremists; she is a supporter of mainstream Islam — the same mainstream Islam that is the main font of the evil that is flowing out naturally and logically as ISIS. The Counter-Jihad should not cultivate a naivete as gullible (if indeed that is what it is) as mortimer’s.
Bezelel says
They all sound so comfortable and justified with what they’re doing. islam can still sink lower. I don’t know how, maybe their cannibalism will increase. Supremacy? To the negative. I can’t accept that slavery alone hasn’t caused an uproar in the civilized countries but sex slave children?
No Fear says
The problem is that, in the West, we cannot conceive that religion could be anything other than a self improvement self help regimen.
Islam is simply a method for breeding totally dedicated Jihadis who defend the “cause” (Islam).
Islam has NO other purpose than to self replicate.
Bezelel says
The closest thing we have to compare to would be satanism and once you use that term you will be labeled a religious fanatic. While secularists are defining the new normal, islam is advancing under the banner of tolerance. Right and Wrong are taking taking an ass whooping.
Westman says
“The reason we know they are lies is because there is no way to square these things – forcing people to be slaves and raping them – with the Koran. It’s not Islamic, so they have to lie about that to make it fit the narrative.”
Why is Brennen being dishonest about Quranic support for slavery? One could think, well, he didn’t mention the Hadiths which are more illuminating and leave no doubt that taking sex slaves of war captives is absolutely Islamic, but Quran(33:50, 23:1-6) also refutes his assertion.
It is disappointing that someone we depend upon for our nation’s security would be so poorly informed or create a lie that would ultimately fail. I can only assume that he is misled by some “authority” source such as CAIR or is unwilling to accept fallout for speaking the truth about Islamic Ideology.
voegelinian says
“I can only assume that he is misled by some “authority” source such as CAIR or is unwilling to accept fallout for speaking the truth about Islamic Ideology.”
Sure, that would be your “only” assumption you would be logically forced to conclude — if you didn’t take PC MC into account.
Alice says
I can well imagine she’d be happy to “share the wealth”, so to speak. She gets a reprieve, and so happily joins in the quest for more people to share her plight.
Linde Barrera says
To Alice- I am going to state a premise here. ” Every woman wants to be loved and adored by her man, and wants to be the only woman in his life.” If we take that premise as truth, then the tone of this article reveals the underlying jealousy and resentment that this female writer has for her husband’s sex slave, and the anger she secretly has for her husband. But of course the author must reference and praise allah, and spew propaganda about how wonderful it is and how faithful they are, that they all live out the quran to the letter of the law. And 1 last point, many of these jihadist brides have to reckon that they love a man who cuts people’s heads off. I can’t see any woman being overjoyed at that. But they lie to themselves that it’s all good—all in the name, all in the game, of (murdering, thieving, lying) Islam. Islam is disgusting.
Mirren10 says
”To Alice- I am going to state a premise here. ” Every woman wants to be loved and adored by her man, and wants to be the only woman in his life.” If we take that premise as truth, then the tone of this article reveals the underlying jealousy and resentment that this female writer has for her husband’s sex slave, and the anger she secretly has for her husband.”
I think your premise holds true for the majority of *normal* women.
But I don’t think you’re taking fully into account the pernicious influence of *islam*.
Benedict says
What sort of religion is this, one that preaches rape and a god that permits it. The sooner they are gone the better. EVIL
mortimer says
Islam is the only religion with rules for CORRECT rape.
Beatrix says
Contrary to Richard Bennan’s statements, the taking of non-Islamic women as slaves after winning battle is Islamic. It’s in the Koran and the writings of Muhammad.
Rob says
Where are the Western feminists?
mortimer says
They’re doing nothing because the Muslim women have told them like being beaten.
G179 says
All the lies, deflection & obfuscation in the world will not cover up this stench.
oldwhiteguy says
having sex slaves is an integral part of islam. it is written.
mortimer says
Agree.
Did Richard Brennan ever hear the word ‘HAREM’ ? A harem is a collection of sex slaves. Islamic paradise is brothel of eternal sex slaves.
If Brennan knows the word ‘HAREM’, did he consider that the word alone contradicts all his reasoning?
He should be fired for making that false statement about Islamic slavery.
AJW Liverpool says
I tried to comment in the Daily Mail article – but in the UK, truth-tellers can’t even comment in ostensibly ‘right wing’ newspapers. It has now become the Dhimmi Mail. So not only was i edited out, but I cannot post on this or other articles. Tried setting up a new account but they most have blocked my IP address.
How utterly pathetic. Its only thanks to Americans and sites like this that i can actually have freedom of expression. Its so bad here, utter a word in condemnation, you are blacklisted and shunned as a racist bigot islamophobe etc etc. This is terrible to say, but my gut is telling me that the UK will have to have an event or events on the scale of 9/11 before WAKE UP and start even debating Islam (never mind critiquing – i just want to have an open debate).
Here is the post that was so bad as to get be blocked on their website:
“Richard Brennan and the Liberal Left via think-tanks, ‘academics’ and special interest groups all act as apologists – desperate to hide the truth. They are contorting themselves to prevent the world for seeing Islam for what it really is. Yes – not all Muslims are for this, in fact only a minority are. But the problem lies with the underlying doctrine in the Qur’an, Sira and Hadith. For the truth – and to see why Brennan is so blatantly lying – then google “the religion of peace slavery”. As always, i expect the DM will edit this out. Heaven forbid that actual facts are used.”
In the UK a post like this is soon going to be regarded as Hate Speech.
Linda Rivera says
AJW Liverpool, The Daily Mail will not allow me to make any comments on Islam and Muslims.
And on the Express, if I use the words Muslim and Rape, my comments are immediately deleted.
Steffen Larsen says
Dabig 9 can be found here:
https://azelin.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/the-islamic-state-e2809cdc481biq-magazine-9e280b3.pdf
brenrod says
“‘But what happens when people get there is massive disillusionment because the external propaganda they’re using to recruit is not the reality on the ground – and many try to escape.”
the greatest blessing is that they go to be killed in foreign deserts. More like thesse women should be encouraged to leave so the real world can be rid of the nutters. Get them in foreing deserts and have them killing each other…. whats not to like?
Joseph says
@ brenrod ” Get them in foreing deserts and have them killing each other…. whats not to like?”
_______________________________________________________________
THEY ARE NOT DOING IT FAST ENOUGH!!!!
That what I don’t like
nolongerdhimmi says
Unbelievably filthy
Mirren10 says
”Richard Brennan, a Senior Political Scientist at RAND, says: “There is no way to square these things – forcing people to be slaves and raping them – with the Koran. It’s not Islamic, so they have to lie about that to make it fit the narrative.”
Yet another fool that assumes most people won’t bother to actually *read* the damn thing.
Why do people like this, **do** this ? They can’t really believe *everyone* is an illiterate moron, incapable of reading the texts for themselves. I suppose it’s another example of the mindset that thinks if they only go on telling lies, and tell the lies enough times, somehow it will become truth.
Joseph says
@ Mirren10 “and tell the lies enough times, somehow it will become truth.”
I am a billionaire.
I am a billionaire.
I am a billionaire.
I am a billionaire.
I guess it only works when politicians do it, especially when it comes to Islam
PS I thought you might need a little humor
Mirren10 says
🙂
Nice one, Joseph !
Lee says
I think it is finally dawning on these genetic inbreds that 1400 years of boinking their first cousins has rendered them the largest genetically inbred population on the planet. The number of physically, mentally, genetically and chromosomally deformed children born in muslim-inbred countries is MANY times greater than in the general world population. (In Britain, where muslims comprise 3% of the population, their deformed, retarded offspring comprise more than 30% of the occupants of children’s hospitals. Miscarriages/stillbirths, high infant mortality, serious chromosomal abnormalities causing early childhood mortality are SIGNIFICANTLY higher than in the general British population.) Yet, any suggestion that perhaps they should stop boinking their first cousins is considered “racist” or “islamophobic”.)
Most of us are still waiting for some explanation of exactly what “race” muslims are.
Those beautiful little blonde-haired, blue eyed Yazidi girls and the little Coptic Christian kids are considered real “status symbols” for these savages to own , but make no mistake, they are being used to inject some fresh bloodlines in to the polluted muslim gene pool.
Long before there was any real scientific understanding of the horrors of genetic inbreeding, even the most simple peasants knew the dangers of “line breeding” their livestock. It is equally applicable to human beings. Even the royal families of Europe and Britain were finally able to grasp the concept, but not before they created a significant number of batshit crazy offspring!
With muslims, the controlled breeding of close family relatives is nothing more than a mechanism to assure the control of the transfer of family wealth, and by definition, political-religious power………….. just as it was with the European royals.
The world’s best geneticists all tell us that the muslim nations are dangerously inbred, and now it appears that the Islamic militants may have finally listened. They use the Quaran, with it’s archaic propaganda to justify their behaviour towards “kaffirs”, but I suspect their real motivation for their current behaviour is of a much more contemporary and pragmatic nature.
These people definitely comprise the “shallow end” of the gene pool, I’d say they need “super chlorinating”……………. and SOON!
voegelinian says
“The world’s best geneticists all tell us that the muslim nations are dangerously inbred, and now it appears that the Islamic militants may have finally listened.”
I don’t know about that “now”; the Ottoman Caliphate for centuries raided European villages along the coastlines from Greece all the way to Spain (even — albeit rarely — as far north as Atlantic France, England and Iceland) and attacked European (and later American) ships and abducted white women for sex slaves. I repeat: for centuries.
spot on says
This despicable woman in her burqa is probably happy that she won’t be her husbands sex slave anymore after he gets his new kuffir slave women. Then she can make herself ugly like all the rest and avoid sex with her barbarian husband.
David says
Every day that passes the evidence grows by leaps and bounds, most of it from the mouths of these demonic, satan driven pieces of pig dung, that there will never be an accommodation or state of peace between these useless savages and normal people. We will destroy them, or they will destroy us. It’s just that simple.
voegelinian says
We can’t destroy 1.5 billion Muslims (particularly when millions of them are inside the West dispersed throughout Western societies, and by the time the West wakes up, these millions we can reasonably surmise will be doubled or tripled or quadrupled). But I suspect the braggadocio of David is aimed more at some permutation of the TMOE (Tiny Minority of Extremists) and not the Whole Enchilada. I.e., David is either an asymptotic Softy, or a genocidal Breivikian. The Counter-Jihad subculture seems rather ill-equipped to cultivate a rational middle ground between these two extremes, it seems.
What do I mean by “asymptotic”? The following may help clarify:
Our Asymptotic Analysts
http://hesperado.blogspot.com/2008/04/our-asymptotic-analysts.html
And many more essays I’ve written over the years around that topic:
https://www.google.com/#q=hesperado+asymptotic
Linda Rivera says
Muslim females are as violent, evil and satanic as Muslim males.
I’m waiting for Judgement Day.
Bible, Romans 12:19 VENGEANCE IS MINE, I WILL REPAY, says the Lord.
R.C. says
That scripture does not mean that people cannot rise up and defend themselves to the point of killing their oppressors!
Peggy says
Converts especially are evil. My guess is that the only reason people convert is to Islam is to be able to commit such horrible crimes and satisfy their lust for blood.
I often wondered what women get out of converting to Islam since women are so oppressed. Guess, the converts are not oppressed. I can understand being born into this evil and unable to leave because the fear of death is too strong but now I understand a little better why women convert to it.
This monster was born to be in Satan’s army. That movei “The Omen” comes to mind.
TheBuffster says
Hi, Peggy.
I’ve been reading a lot of apostates’ stories at ex-Muslim websites, and some of the converts say that they converted because they had good Muslim friends whose description of the religion sounded quite benign. They had converted to Islam on that basis, without really looking further into the religion, because they trusted their friends. One person said that he’d been given a “whitewashed” Koran, and it wasn’t until after he converted and read a real Koran that he left the religion. Immediately.
A friend of mine has been interviewing apostates, and she confirms that there’s a bogus Koran out there being distributed to the unsuspecting. It quells the kaffir’s fears and sometimes wins converts, as some of her interviewees know all too well.
I imagine some of those converts stick with reading the bogus Koran, only, and that it takes them longer to wake up to the truth than those converts who jump in with ambition and read the whole Islamic trilogy from real texts.
Another thing my friend told me is that some of the apostates she’s interviewed told her that as converts they were told *not* to read the Koran until they had been a Muslim for at least a year or two, to get to know Islam through the prayers and by talking with their Muslim friends and their imam.
It seems that some Muslims do dawa through cultish methods…
TheBuffster says
It’s also interesting that among the ex-Muslims’ stories I’ve read, many of the apostates who were born to a Muslim family didn’t know much about their religion, and were about as clueless as their naïve convert counterparts about Mohammad’s life and the Koran. Many of the born-Muslims also left Islam when they finally got around to reading the Koran for themselves.
Bosch Fawstin’s Muslim family weren’t pious and he, himself, had to read the Islamic literature after 9/11 to find out whether Islam really approved of such aggression.(He had left Islam well before that, though.) He grew up Muslim, but at 9/11 he still didn’t know just how bad Islam was.
So whether convert or born to it, a Muslim can have a very mistaken idea regarding what Islam, at root, is about.
R.C. says
Mass Kidnapping, raping and murdering is very much mainstream Islam–this is Sharia Islam–pretending otherwise is not helping!
R.C. says
Richard Brennan is a damn liar–I have a copy of the Qur’an–I know what’s in it! Islam has been Satanically evil from day one–there is nothing good in Islam!
Gary says
I agree. Evil from day one. Yet shockingly…. millions follow “The Prophet” and revere him like he’s some god.
“The Prophet this.” “The Prophet that.” Bla Bla Bla
Unbelievable.
Holy prophet my ass!
Kepha says
My relatives who think that Jesus Christ stayed dead and that death is the end of it still reverently call that 7th century Hijazi warlord, liar, cheat, and blasphemer “the Prophet”. it makes me sick.
R.C. says
Such foolish people are a pathetic disgrace.
Champ says
…”there is nothing good in Islam!”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You can say that again, R.C.! Nada! Zilch!
rabrooks says
Bet you won’t ever see this story on major tv networks….
The truth gets out! How long before they label this “islamophobia”?
theBuckWheat says
I am now forced to choose between dueling Islamic experts, some of whom tell me that sex slavery is horrible and some who tell me that it is a righteous institution that is force once again that ISIS is at war with the Christians. I can only go on what I read, and sure enough, ISIS is right. It appears that the secular progressive apologists in the western media who are flat wrong about who is “misunderstanding” the “religion of peace”. Time to wake up to the truth, oh useful idiots in the progressive west!
Uncle Vladdi says
Re: “Richard Brennan, a Senior Political Scientist at RAND, says: “There is no way to square these things – forcing people to be slaves and raping them – with the Koran. It’s not Islamic, so they have to lie about that to make it fit the narrative.”
THIS TRAITOR SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH FRAUD IMMEDIATELY.
R.C. says
He is a fraud indeed–and by lying about Islam he is promoting Islamic terrorism. He wrote like a dhimmi.
Edgar Allen says
The Links to the videos that RS refers to, have been removed, surprise surprise.
Here are links to the 2 stories. I remember them well from prior searches.
First the link to the Kuwaiti Politician lady, from MEMRI TV:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RyIM2OoNC0
Same video as above, with commentary by a scornful commentator:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWq7DGGHeyc
Next is the link to Egyptian Sheikh Abu Ishaq Al Huwaini, a well-known and ‘respected’ Salafi scholar,
explaining how Muslims can improve their financial position by invading Christian (or non-Muslim) lands, and taking and selling slaves in general, and sex-slaves in particular. (The stupid Israelis go the long route to making money by inventing things).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8psdTyi52U
Pass this along. The videos speak for themselves.
Cartimandua says
It all makes me sick to my stomach..and grieves my heart, terribly. Do you not also feel so?
R.C. says
It grieves me too.
awake says
The “jihadi bride” just appreciated a small respite from her own regularly scheduled rapes.
Savages, both male and many Muslim females.
Matthieu Baudin says
…‘Indeed it is our pure Islam, which upraises every lowly-one and puts an end to every deficiency. I and those with me at home prostrated to Allah in gratitude on the day the first slave-girl entered our home.’…
Sadistic Piety. Obviously many ISIS women revel in it. Relationships of dominance and submission, it’s a recurrent, central theme, in Islamic ideology. We shouldn’t be quick to assume that Moslem women who carry on like this are victims; some get great satisfaction humiliating other women. Many of these sadistic zealots probably enjoy watching and listening to their husbands rape and morally crush their captive slaves. These pious twisted housekeepers no doubt enjoy adding their own demands upon their hapless female slave servants; don’t be surprised if some are making their own homosexual demands when their husbands are absent.
When Shia forces eventually topple ISIS in Iraq, I truly hope they don’t disgrace themselves with the scale and depth of depravity as this millenarian religious cult.
R.C. says
Well written. But Shia Islam will not destroy ISIS–and they are just as bad.
Matthieu Baudin says
You may be right R.C. on both points. However at this juncture there is no other force committed to toppling ISIS that has a chance of success. The U.S. and western friends are bunkering down in Isolationist ‘no boots on the ground’ territory, the Sunni population in Iraq is on a rapid spiral into fanaticisation and neighbouring Arab national forces seem more concerned about Shia expansion of influence than about the rise of ISIS. Iraqi Shia are at least fighting for their lives which give them greater incentive to wage a serious campaign – as for their moral calibre in battle I’m simply hoping that they won’t debase themselves to the extent of ISIS.
When ISIS are defeated, one way or the other, we need to have these sadist womenfolk on trial and we should put some real effort into the rehabilitation of the slave women and children who may be in danger of being abandoned by their own communities.
voegelinian says
Wow, I was amazed that my comments attracted no flies — until, of course, I saw the telltale Phillip Jihadski… A day on Jihad Watch without a fly would be like a day without sunshine…!
Angemon says
voegelinian posted:
“Wow, I was amazed that my comments attracted no flies”
No you weren’t. You knew exactly that if you tried to rewrite history again on who coined the term “asymptotic” you’d be called out for going back and forth from “I coined it” (when things were going good) to “Hugh Fitzgerald coined it” (when someone pointed out it didn’t mean what you thought it did). I’m sure that in your mind you see yourself as a invisible spider in the center of every large web, pulling strings and getting other people to act without them ever comprehending they’re puppets in your hands. Aww, shucks, you is so smart, voeg! Except when it comes to getting people to blindly defend you. They insist on having their pesky “ideals” and “values”, or even a “mind of their own” when all they need to do is shut the hell up and tell anyone who even thinks of criticizing you to “stop being a childish ass” or “go f*** yourself”, right?
In any case, regarding the term “asymptotic”, we may not know for sure who coined it, but we do know who didn’t: you. You merely tried to take credit for it, much like when you disparage and demean counter-jihadis only to repeat what they say and take it as your own. You’re no better than the muslims who want muslims and islam to be given the credit for, for example, the creation of the number zero or the discovery of America.
melvin polatnick says
Elite Muslims possess harems containing hundreds. There is seldom compensation for his concubines as they age. Pimps are used to kidnap or recruit little girls, some of them are as young as seven. Soldiers of ISIS are permitted to rape any infidel but few can afford to own their harvest.