• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

UK: City that covered up Muslim rape gangs wants to ban anti-child rape protests

May 27, 2015 2:37 pm By Robert Spencer

Rotherham-Child-Abuse-Protest-1,400 British non-Muslim children were gang-raped and brutalized by Muslims in Rotherham, and “several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist; others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.”

The real people responsible for these 1,400 abused children are those who, like far-Left hate campaigners Nick Lowles and Fiyaz Mughal, created a culture in which those who knew about this hesitated to speak out, for fear of being called “racist.” They are the ones who ought to be put on trial — Lowles and Mughal and their ilk. But instead, Rotherham wants to ban protests against child rape. Britain’s surrender and submission to Sharia-inspired brutality is nearly complete.

“Rotherham Council And Police Want Powers To Ban Anti-Child Rape Protests,” by Oliver Lane, Breitbart, May 26, 2015 (thanks to Inexion):

Officials in the Pakistani child rape gang scandal town of Rotherham are moving to ban protests against their own incompetence. They have appealed to the home secretary for emergency special powers under the Public Order Act 1986.

The council first came to national prominence when its social services worked together with elements of the police to spectacularly fail to detect the systematic grooming, rape and prostitution of over 1,400 vulnerable children. The victims were often in the care of the council children’s services and “as young as 12″, and “barely pubescent”. Council commissioners claim the protests against them are becoming prohibitively expensive to police, with one event in September 2014 costing over one million pounds, meaning they should therefore be banned, reports local newspaper The Star.

Commissioner Mary Ney, who was appointed by the government as part of a group of five professionals who took over running the town in February to replace the failed former council, acknowledged that the £2 million extra spent on policing operations was covered by Home Office spending in her letter. Writing to the Home Secretary Theresa May, commissioner complained it was the protests, rather than the problem the town has with child rape that was causing reputational damage: She wrote:

“Over an extended period, the town has been subject to a significant number of events by right-wing groups, and counter demonstrations by left wing groups.

“This has, and continues to, consume a vast amount of police resource, both within and outside South Yorkshire, at significant cost to the public purse. However, more significant is the damage to the reputation of the town, and the impact that this has had on the town centre in particular, which has been the focus of these events.

“Due to their regularity there is a real perception amongst people using the town that it is not safe, and that there are protests every Saturday… The town needs to move on and further events will be damaging both to community cohesion, and the ability of the town to recover”.

Despite insisting it was time for the town to forget child abuse and move on, The Star also reports today a further four men were arrested this weekend for ‘abduction and grooming’.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: dhimmitude, Featured, Sharia, United Kingdom, Useful idiots, willful ignorance Tagged With: Rotherham, Rotherham Council


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. KrazyKafir says

    May 27, 2015 at 2:43 pm

    The people of England need to rise up. Soon.

    • William says

      May 27, 2015 at 5:57 pm

      Britain just had an election and voted back in the same people that have been there for years now. So, which people of England need to rise up. Most are either asleep or content or afraid. I don’t see any rising up in Britain’s future. The situation will only turn around if or when a few brave and honest souls take power by any means necessary. Waiting on the masses to rise up will be a wait till eternity. The masses, unfortunately, only follow or are led.

      • Peggy says

        May 27, 2015 at 8:23 pm

        All the masses had to do was vote for the right party. No courage needed at all but it seems that the masses just don’t get it.
        They don’t know how dangerous it was for them to give their votes to the main parties. Do they even read any blogs at all? Do they get their news only from TV? Are they that lazy to look for information?
        Whatever the reason for the first time I am willing to say that people of UK deserve their fate now. They had alternatives which they rejected.

        • P0rkCh0ps says

          May 28, 2015 at 1:10 am

          Unfortunately it takes a long time for the masses to wake from their slumber and will only do so with strong leadership, certainly not with the present lot of traitors in parliament. The situation is going to have to get a whole lot worse with country eventually falling into civil war.

        • Frans Groenendijk says

          May 28, 2015 at 6:07 am

          “Do they get their news only from TV?”

          Exactly. That is the second biggest problem. (The first is the grip the multiculturalists have on education)

        • Shane says

          May 28, 2015 at 10:01 am

          Yes, they deserve their fate just as America deserves its fate for electing dhimmi cowards like Obama into high offices. We need to support politicians who will tell the truth about Islam its connection to terrorism. Both Bush and Obama lied to us about Islam being a religion of peace and Islamic terrorists having nothing to do with Islam.

        • carlos malleum says

          May 29, 2015 at 5:19 am

          The problem is Peggy that there is no democracy in the UK at the moment. Thanks to our antiquated two party political system and first past the post elections we see the SNP returned to Westminster with 1.4m votes and 56 seats whereas UKIP gleaned 4.6 million votes and have 1 seat.

          Sorry but we need a PR system urgently in Westminster, the FPTP system may have served us well for 250 odd years but it is hopeless in today’s plural society. Dismissing these demands as redundant because we had a referrendum on this 5 years ago is nonsense, with the speed of development in communications, social media and in particular sites like Twitter means that vote might as well have been 50 years ago for its relevance today.

          Unlike the USA which has 3 pillars to its democracy and the granite foundations of a constitution, we in the UK have 1 pillar – Parliament. We do not elect our judges, our senate (Lords) or our Head of State (aka Liz/Brenda) . This might not have been an issue prior to 2000 but since the application of the European Commission of Human Rights into our law it has become a real issue.

          In Britain we are stuck between a rock and a hard place at the moment. On one hand our democratic tradition is shared with the USA and the enlightenment idea of “Natural Rights” rather than “Human Rights”. It’s important to understand the distinction here. The UK never really had a Human Rights issue in the 20th C on the scale of mainland Europe. The ‘gentleman’s agreement’ that once balanced the power of the courts ‘crown’ and parliament was a reasonably elegant system which permitted sensible democratic reform even if it needed the occasional kick op the jacksay to do so. In contrast Europe had come out of the back of Nazi occupation and was, in the case of Germany in particular, made up of nations with unstable democracies, politicians who had collaborated with Nazi rule, and in Germany, a country that had no real democratic tradition. Democracy as enforced on Europe after WW2 is very different in it’s philosophy than that of the UK. Germany has some laws which were very essential during the period of de Nazification. The acceptance of this system by the German people, joined by others in Europe, horrified at the destruction of WW2 formed the basis of the motivation of the EU.

          This has created a crisis of ideology in the UK because our democratic traditions and court system is simply not compatible with the EU ones. firstly there is the ECHR, many ignorant Britons are kicking up a stink about the proposed appeal of this European law from our law. They don;t seem to realise that the ECHR is actually more repressive and authoritatian than what we had before. Because our system of English Common law relies on case law, it has given our courts huge powers and worse, unlike in other EU countries, it forces us to include judgements made at the European court of Human Rights as well as the EU court of appeal, into our law despite the fact that the British people may not have asked for such a law. The law of our land is now effectively in the hands of unelected foreign judges with no understanding of our democratic rights and traditions.

          Worse still – the current political oligarchy of the mainstream political parties is completely enthralled to europe, their political DNA is hard wired to europe. This is why we see the creeping introduction of authoritarian laws and the turning of our bobbies into political Gendarmarie who can now arrest you for what you say rather than what you do.

          Such is the disconnect between the political oligarchy and their BBC and media allies and the plebs – the electorate. That decisions in Westminster are rarely those which the public actually want.

          We desperately need ground up political reform in the UK. starting with a fair and open referrendum on EU membership but also:
          1/ Proportional representation at General Elections
          2/ Publically funded political parties
          3/ a ban on lobbying organisations
          4/ a ban on publically funded charities and NGOs
          5/ an elected upper house
          6/ elected judiciary – our system, worked beautifully ,once, but because of bad EU law and the disrespect shown to the apolitical stance of the once independent judiciary they are now political and therefore require to be elected.
          7/ repeal the European Bill of Human Rights
          8/ repeal the ‘hate speech laws’ and restore freedom of speech
          9/ give us a US style written constitution to protect our natural rights.

          It’s often difficult for our American cousins to understand that although we speak the same language and share the same history, their freedoms are protected by the US constitution that can only be messed with in exceptional circumstances and when court, exec and senate are aligned. We don’t have this protection. We don’t have a representative democracy. We understand your frustrations as you say we are sleep walking into sharia and tyranny because we share those frustrations.

          It will be interesting to see what happens over the next couple of years. Cameron and the Oligarchy have a very real problem in as much that many millions of voters are unrepresented and disillusioned. Unless the current parliament addresses this with some urgency then we are on course for revolution in the UK. Last time we had one the civil war that resulted caused estimated deaths of 1/4 of the entire population of these islands.

          As far as this case is concerned. it speaks volumes that a local political leader’s instincts are to silence democratic rights rather than to listen too them. The politicians in this country cannot help themselves, they do not even realise that they are doing it. and will probably still be repeating how right they were as they climb the ladder to the noose hanging from the lamp post as we string them up.

        • Linde Barrera says

          May 29, 2015 at 11:03 am

          To Carlos malleum- Thank you for your awesome comment on the British legal system. Seems like revisions are in order and will happen if enough people push in the same direction behind the just laws you all desire. Maybe you will start the momentum going? Good luck with this, and God’s blessings.

      • gravenimage says

        May 28, 2015 at 2:03 am

        Actually, it would have been even worse had the other main party—Labour—been voted in.

        Jihad Watch covered the story, the headline reading (I’m paraphrasing here) ‘Britain decides to commit suicide more slowly’.

        • Peggy says

          May 28, 2015 at 3:04 am

          I agree, the other guy was insane.
          There were other parties available to the people but they still wanted more of the same. We can see just how much media has done to prevent anyone who is patriotic from getting votes.

      • voegelinian says

        May 28, 2015 at 2:05 pm

        Yes, it’s the same in every Western country. The majority of the Ordinary People (forget the “Elites”) are asleep or only have a vague notion that a Tiny MInority of Extremists are a problem, but don’t want to expand this problem lest they begin to think the thought crime of bigotry and “racism”). For some reason, the Counter Jihad thinks that the majority of Ordinary People out there think just like us. That is a strangely over-optimistic, if not surreal inclination. It makes one wonder if they ever get out much.

      • DAI says

        May 28, 2015 at 2:28 pm

        Yeah,you`re right. The electorate did vote back in a Labour administration,despite what horrors they,the council ,ignored and hushed up.Rotherham is lost,as is the rest of my country. There`s no waking up dead people i`m afraid.

    • particolor says

      May 28, 2015 at 7:18 am

      And You Voted for A Repeat of the Same Prime Minister ?? WTF ??

    • voegelinian says

      May 28, 2015 at 2:03 pm

      Before they rise up, they need to wake up. Unless we want them stumbling around half asleep in the dark after they have risen up.

      • particolor says

        May 28, 2015 at 7:51 pm

        Yes I think they should get some Viagra too !! And Outbreed the Baskets ! 🙂

  2. mortimer says

    May 27, 2015 at 2:43 pm

    All the politicians, all the police constables and their commanders, all the social workers, all the Muslim clerics, all the journalists…in short…ALL WHO KNEW about the pedophiles and SHUT UP…they are ALL guilty and should be sued and sent to jail for failing to protect the vulnerable.

    At very least, they should all be fired.

  3. mortimer says

    May 27, 2015 at 2:47 pm

    Commissioner Mary Ney wrote: “The town needs to move on and further events will be damaging both to community cohesion.”

    No, Mary, you need to be ASHAMED for stopping the pursuit of JUSTICE! You should resign!

    Justice for the victims!

    • Linde Barrera says

      May 27, 2015 at 3:50 pm

      To Mortimer- Thank you for your posts of 2:43, 2:47 and 3:22 pm.You hit the nail on the head each time you post. I love reading your posts because I get the feeling you are a real life “Avenger”. And if you are a British citizen, I welcome your honest comment on my post about my letter to Queen Elizabeth II.

      • voegelinian says

        May 28, 2015 at 2:10 pm

        Yes, he’s an Avenger — against the Tiny Minority of Extremists (with the “Tiny” adjusted in order to appear to be more robust than the Mainstream), leaving the vast majority of Muslims Who Just Wanna Have a Sandwich apparently untouched (at least untouched by any measures that might infringe on them unduly):

        mortimer says

        September 18, 2014 at 4:21 pm

        Nonsense. Most Muslims are much nicer and more moral than Mohammed. They believe theoretically, but most do not practice all the things required by Islam. Perhaps 85% of Muslims are non-practicing ‘hypocrites’. Only 15% are observant.

        **************

        And at the time, I almost fell off my chair to see many Jihad Watch regulars actually take him to task for this (which the reader can see by scrolling down after clicking the link) — which is quite remarkable when you consider how rarely they do this.

        http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/09/muslims-protest-against-australia-terror-raids-there-is-anger-in-the-community-we-have-been-victimised-for-years-and-years/comment-page-1#comment-1121630

        • Linde Barrera says

          May 28, 2015 at 8:29 pm

          To Vogue (Voegelinian)- I honestly do like your comments, as your have a deep and profound way of getting to the truth and reality of a topic. You are also very methodical and detailed oriented. I just prefer Mortimer’s writing style, because his style is one with which I identify. As to his numerical/ statistical quotation, let’s give him the benefit of doubt that it was an honest mistake. And thank you for referring me to that link where Brigitte Gabriel is speaking. I watched and thought she delivered her message well and without fear or apology. I only became aware of JW in Nov. 2014. I do believe the Lord led me here because I would go to the public library 2 to 3 times a week from August to Dec. to learn about Islam and why things were going so well in Syria and Iraq for ISIS, when I thought ISIS should be losing. Take care Vogue. I look forward to your next post.

  4. Cathy says

    May 27, 2015 at 2:55 pm

    I applaud the protesters. Something must be done to rid the area of these disgusting people who view young girls as “fresh meat”. These evil Pakistani rapists and their families should be thrown out of the country and never allowed to return.

  5. Thomas says

    May 27, 2015 at 3:06 pm

    So its the protests that are giving this town a bad reputation.

    There would not be any protests if the rapes stopped.

    Commissioner Mary Ney’s logic would blame Martin Luther King, Jr. for giving Selma a bad reputation!

    • TheBuffster says

      May 28, 2015 at 12:07 am

      Your analogy to Martin Luther King and Selma is apt, Thomas.

      Oh, I can understand the money concerns and the worries about the intimidation of those who might not visit the town on a Saturday because of the regular protests. But this is what happens when the local government does not do it’s proper job of protecting people from criminals.

      People have a right to be outraged. They have a right to protest. And the local government deserves to cop it. This is no small issue, and it’s not something that people of conscience can just protest once and be satisfied. If the protests are peaceful, they should not be banned.

      There is a just concern, if the business owners in the area are being hurt by these protests – they’re innocent and shouldn’t have to suffer financial losses. If the protests are actually damaging business, that should be everyone’s concern.

      But has anyone offered a compromise? Perhaps once-a-month protests held in different areas of the town? Something where the interests of the innocent parties can be reconciled?

  6. spot on says

    May 27, 2015 at 3:20 pm

    In the UK, we are seeing the precise execution of the Islamic plan for conquest adapted to the 21st century. This is so sorry to see. The UK has always been our closest ally. When citizens will fully allow their female young children and their neighbor’s female young children to be openly groomed for repeated rape and conquest by enemy pedophiles, then they have surrendered and submitted to the enemy completely. The raping is usually the last part of a barbarian conquest. I have a hard time believing the UK would submit to this but I see the facts and I must believe it. Most people are high up on their balloon trip and will refuse to believe this but the enemy will definitely exploit this opportunity elsewhere Europe. They will do the same in the US when feasible.

    The Muslims have been maneuvering for years in Europe and it looks like they have settled on this plan to subjugate the UK and other European countries where they can. Obviously male Mohammed pedophiles love this and will continue to thrust themselves (literally) onto apparently dhimmified young and old females any time they have the desire. Anyone who will stand by while their children and their neighbor’s female 12 year old or younger children are sexually groomed for rape by enemy pedophiles is completely defeated and demoralized a sure sign of complete unconditional surrender. This is truly very sad.

    • exBrit says

      May 27, 2015 at 3:36 pm

      Spot on, as an ex Brit (now in TX) you have written an excellent analysis of the situtation. Sad but true.

  7. mortimer says

    May 27, 2015 at 3:22 pm

    British Leftards are defending the Moztard PEDOPHILES, because they need them to destroy British civilization.

    The Leftards are guilty of destroying these young persons’ lives. They should be sentenced to lifelong imprisonment.

    • spot on says

      May 27, 2015 at 4:10 pm

      “The Leftards are guilty of destroying these young persons’ lives”

      Absolutely. Extreme Leftards aka “destroyers” are good friends with chaos and anarchy and the moderate lefties. When the enemy comes to our door, they can all be depended upon to join with that enemy. 25% of US are extreme Leftards.

      If the government will not punish them for these atrocities, vigilante justice should be allowed.

      • voegelinian says

        May 28, 2015 at 2:14 pm

        The problem is not merely Leftists. The vast majority of Conservatives, Centrists, and that other demographic rarely noticed — the Comfortably Apolitical — are also enabling the PC MC worldview which is the #1 reason for our myopia to the problem of Muslims.

  8. Angemon says

    May 27, 2015 at 3:26 pm

    The town needs to move on and further events will be damaging both to community cohesion, and the ability of the town to recover

    Oh, great, again with doing something in the name of “community cohesion”. Grab your ankles and brace for the worst.

    • spot on says

      May 27, 2015 at 3:34 pm

      The men and boys may be next. Wait until the enemy pederasts that have somehow slipped through the Islamic stoning process arrive.

    • Januk36 says

      May 27, 2015 at 4:46 pm

      Community cohesion and multiculturalism are mutually exclusive. Sorry to say that.

      Caring parents wont give a f… about a cities reputation. This makes me so angry.

      • Peggy says

        May 27, 2015 at 8:27 pm

        Maybe these parents are the ONLY ones who voted for parties willing to sort the Muslim problem out. The majority are either too stupid to see the problem or part of the problem.

  9. Jacksonl03 says

    May 27, 2015 at 3:33 pm

    “Despite insisting it was time for the town to forget child abuse and move on, The Star also reports today a further four men were arrested this weekend for ‘abduction and grooming’.”

    And that says it all!

    • TheBuffster says

      May 28, 2015 at 1:17 am

      It says that they’re still rounding up men from the sex abuse rings. But at least they’re actually arresting them, actually doing something about it, now that the taboo has been broken and the authorities have been shamed.

      And it says that the sex grooming rings are pretty damned big operations.

  10. Linde Barrera says

    May 27, 2015 at 3:37 pm

    Yesterday I wrote and mailed a respectful letter to Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain. I cited Jihad Watch website and its articles about how the English police didn’t prosecute the Pakistani Muslims who raped the underage girls, and said no prosecution would be forthcoming. I stated to her majesty that my comment on Jihad Watch was: “Sue all the officials including their gorgeous prime minister, David Cameron.” I also suggested to her that Great Britain make a law changing the name of the “Church of England” to the “Church of Jesus Christ”, concurrent with a new law that states there is no need for a state sponsored religion or church. (Let’s face it, Henry VIII created the Church of England 481 years ago, and his reasons are obsolete, in my opinion.) No “equality” considerations with other faiths for any benefits because there would be no government benefits. New construction of religious buildings would be paid by funds of congregants or individuals giving a gift, not any government, including any foreign government. I wanted to get this idea out to her, even if my letter gets a laugh and no response. I would be interested in opinions from JW commenters who live in Great Britain. Do you think separation of church and state is a good thing? If yes, could it ever happen in Great Britain?

    • spot on says

      May 27, 2015 at 3:52 pm

      Linde, I am in the US and I applaud you for what you are trying to do. The very best to you in your fine efforts.

      • Linde Barrera says

        May 27, 2015 at 5:45 pm

        To Spot On- Thank you for your encouragement. And you keep writing those insightful, truthful comments. I love your writings.

    • TheBuffster says

      May 28, 2015 at 1:27 am

      Linde said: “I cited Jihad Watch website and its articles about how the English police didn’t prosecute the Pakistani Muslims who raped the underage girls, and said no prosecution would be forthcoming.”

      Wait a minute, Linde. Are you saying that the sex grooming rapists are not going to be prosecuted, even now? Because I don’t remember reading about that. I thought they *were* going to be prosecuted.

      • Linde Barrera says

        May 28, 2015 at 11:05 am

        To The Buffster- I love your moniker. My letter to Queen Elizabeth II was written and mailed the same day, May 25. Up to that point, I had read that only 1 case was prosecuted out of the many cases perpetrated by these Pakistani-British Muslim thugs on underage females in England. And to be honest, I don’t research 10 sources, I read 3. So since my letter was mailed, news is stating that more thugs will be prosecuted, and I am happy about that. Bet you are too, and so are most of our fellow JW buddies.

    • RonaldB says

      May 28, 2015 at 9:13 am

      Linda,

      I like your sentiments, particularly your stance on the separation of church and state.

      As some of the posters have pointed out, the royal family traditionally stays out of British politics.

      Have you submitted your letter to a British newspaper for a “letters to the editor” or even an op-ed piece. It’s unlikely, but possible. Perhaps you should also send your letter to David Cameron and the Conservative Party (the Labor party seems to be a lost cause).

      One addition I would suggest is that Britain adopt a super-law, akin to a constitutional amendment, absolutely protecting the freedom of speech. No jail for hate-mongers, holocaust-deniers, or critics or supporters of Islam. Everyone battles on the same grounds of free speech.

      Talking about free speech, also consider supporting the full withdrawal of government support for the BBC. A government-sponsored news outlet is always a bad idea.

      • Linde Barrera says

        May 28, 2015 at 11:46 am

        To RonaldB- I love your suggestion about writing a letter to the British Prime Minister and a letter to the editor of a reputable British newspaper. I will incorporate your excellent ideas. I have several family obligations on my timetable, but I will do it within a few days. Should I get a response, I will post it on JW! Thank you so much for sharing your thinking.

  11. somehistory says

    May 27, 2015 at 4:25 pm

    What reputation does the town have that it wishes to protect? It now has the reputation of allowing the repeated rape of young girls by gangs of muslims who have been protected by the ones hired to protect the young children from such as the ones raping them. Is this the reputation she wants the town to protect?
    The protests are an effort to put an end to the repeated rapes of young girls by gangs of muslims who have been protected by the ones hired to protect the young children from such as the ones raping them.
    The bottom line for this woman politician in her letter is the money is more important than the lives and health of these children.
    Doesn’t GB have socialized medicine where the government pays the costs of medical treatment? What about the costs for mental and emotional help/therapy and the cost for VD of all kinds including HIV/AIDS. Perhaps the victims and their families should get together and bombard the community with the need for testing to make sure these children have not also been polluted by disgusting diseases. Make it more expensive to treat the children than protect them if money is what matters to this woman.
    There is not much time left for these children or their families before all of the problems rape causes if it hasn’t already cost lives.

    islam is a disgusting wild beast of satan. And these people covering over the crimes of islam’s adherents are allowing satan to have his way.

    • LeeZee says

      May 27, 2015 at 5:35 pm

      Somehistory Says is right on the mark. Apparently, $$$’s is more important to this “Official” than the well-being of her constituents. As for “Community Cohesion”, it’s already on it’s way as Shari’a Law takes hold, completely. Money can be saved by eliminating protection altogether during protests, and letting the chips fall where they may. Not only have these young girls been raped, tortured and demeaned, but the whole town has been shafted! There is no reputation to be saved; it is Sodom and Gemorrah. The Queen could dissolve Parliament and send in the troops. Perhaps she had better, before she has to wear a Burkah, too, and then she’ll have to give up her hats.

    • Peggy says

      May 27, 2015 at 8:38 pm

      These poor children were polluted the moment these beasts touched them. There should ba a massive group lawsuit against the police and other institutions which failed the kids. If government wants to brush these crimes under the carpet they will have to pay a huge price. Once these lawsuits start world media will become involced and UK will have egg on it’s face.
      Maybe then they will be forced to deal with these savages properly.

      • TheBuffster says

        May 28, 2015 at 1:29 am

        A lawsuit seems like a good idea to me.

        Way better than, say, vigilantism.

  12. GB says

    May 27, 2015 at 4:36 pm

    I have recently been on a teacher training course in England. On the first day the importance of safeguarding of children was taught to us. But all I could think of was the way in which the police, social services, MPs, councillors and even the Mayor conspired to hide the systematic abuse of children in Rotherham. They did this because they were afraid it would cause a problem for community relations because the vast majority of the abusers were Asians – mostly men of Pakistani or Bangladeshi heritage. Therefore,the torture, rape and sexual abuse of vulnerable and under age girls was less important than spoiling the image of muslims in Britain. I came to the conclusion that, in fact, safeguarding of children was not considered important. What did the schools in Rotherham do about this abuse? What were the teachers and teaching unions doing about it? Nothing has been done to the Labour MPs that stood by and the councillors, again Labour, that even gave the new addresses of the girls to their abusers so that abuse could continue. Sickening.

    • Linde Barrera says

      May 27, 2015 at 5:36 pm

      To GB- I read your post about your experiences as a teacher in England. I am a retired NYC teacher. I am just aghast at what you described. It sounds like open season on innocents. Something has to change. Your post has prompted me to pray without ceasing about this sick subject. Thank you.

    • cs says

      May 27, 2015 at 6:17 pm

      Thanks for your post GB, PC will kill us all, and that is to protect a people who is not really worth the effort.

      • cs says

        May 27, 2015 at 6:29 pm

        I am going to save your post for my records.

    • voegelinian says

      May 28, 2015 at 2:19 pm

      “Therefore,the torture, rape and sexual abuse of vulnerable and under age girls was less important than spoiling the image of muslims in Britain”

      Yep. This is the #1 reason why most Westerners throughout the entire West (including the majority of Ordinary People, not just “Elites” and not just “Leftists”) remain myopic to the problem of Muslims. They are afraid of being bigoted or “racist” (and reminding them that Islam is “not a race” has absolutely ZERO effect, so it’s pointless).

      • peter says

        May 28, 2015 at 6:38 pm

        I do not believe the people of britian are afraid of been called racist can be used as an excuse in this case . The truth of the matter is they have become to dependant on others to do what they themselves should be doing. Marching down streets is not going to solve this problem.If these swine want to act like savages ,then treat them like as such.Gangs of vigilanties should be formed and used to beat the crap out of these animals.I can guarante they will soon get the message and wont be looking for second helpings.

        • particolor says

          May 28, 2015 at 8:14 pm

          All the Skinheads are too old now !! 🙂 And their Bother Boots are worn out !!

        • voegelinian says

          May 28, 2015 at 9:41 pm

          I didn’t say the fear of “racism” is an excuse — I’m merely pointing out it’s a fact that explains why the entire mainstream West (“Elites” as well as millions of Ordinary People) remain so bloody myopic about this problem.`

  13. spot on says

    May 27, 2015 at 4:40 pm

    “What reputation does the town have that it wishes to protect? ”

    Somehistory, surely you are correct with this. I don’t have any idea how widespread this is in the UK. What I do know that the final coup de gras of a Muslim barbarian invading army is to rape the females. With Muslims this is later followed by converting the young boys to Islam and making them fight and kill their relatives. It is hard to tell where the Muslims are with their plan for the UK but they definitely have this kind of a plan. They are doing this elsewhere in the ME with the Yidziis as we speak.

  14. jayell says

    May 27, 2015 at 6:07 pm

    “Due to (the regularity of the protests) there is a real perception amongst people using the town that it is not safe, and that there are protests every Saturday… The town needs to move on and further events will be damaging both to community cohesion, and the ability of the town to recover”.

    1. The town will ‘move on’ when the all the criminal perpetrators of the scandal have been properly dealt with. According to reports, nothing of the like has happened yet.
    2. Any suggestion that a further protest of any scale will ‘damage community cohesion’ is frankly ludicrous, since it would be logical to assume that any ‘community cohesion’ that was has already been damaged beyond repair. Rotherham, as some kind of multicultural paradise, is already effectively dead.

    • TheBuffster says

      May 28, 2015 at 1:35 am

      Amen, Jayell.

      In a situation like this the only thing that can mend the breakdown of community cohesion is the actual administration of justice. And that means justice not only concerning the criminals themselves, but the officials who did not do the job they were paid to do.

  15. thelmalou says

    May 27, 2015 at 6:13 pm

    How about this? We’ll stop protesting when they stop raping.

  16. Michael Warden says

    May 27, 2015 at 6:29 pm

    Rotherham is only one of many towns and cities in the UK that have suffered the systematic raping of children – young girls from about 10 up to 15 (16 is the age of consent here). First made public in 2001, publicised by Nick Griffin and Marlene Guest ( Nick Griffin was charged with Race Hate for that), it went on for years until so many people knew that the media had to get involved. The police, council and social workers ALL knew. Girls went to the police and reported the rapes only to be told “don’t cause trouble”. The townspeople of Rotherham were so grateful to the political party that publicised the rapes and at last caused some action that in the 2015 General Election they gave the current leader of that party just a couple of hundred votes while the Labour Party candidate – the party that had traded young girls lives for muslim votes – received nearly 20,000 votes. That town has no honour.

    • Linde Barrera says

      May 27, 2015 at 6:45 pm

      To Michael Warden- Your post was heartbreaking. But as to the town not having honor, I would say, they have no brains and no guts. What in hell is wrong with them?

      • voegelinian says

        May 28, 2015 at 2:23 pm

        The fear of being “racist” is more powerful than anything else — people getting mass-murdered, girls getting raped and groomed for prostitution, death threats, terror attacks, violent civil unrest, Jew-hatred, etc. — all of this takes second place in order to avoid the most horrible thing of all to the majority of Westerners: the horror of being a racist — which is what we will become (so thinks the majority of Westerners) if we think any negative thoughts about Muslims and take any negative actions — any negative actions at all — against Muslims.

        I don’t know why most in the Counter-Jihad can’t seem to see this.

        • peter says

          May 28, 2015 at 6:43 pm

          The people of rotherham are not afraid of been called racist ,They are just cowards who have become to dependent on others to do what is necessary to protect their children. They should form vigilanty gangs and beat the crap out of these swine .MARCHING is for wimps ,This is what they will really understand.

        • Linde Barrera says

          May 28, 2015 at 8:40 pm

          To Vogue (Voegelinian)- I totally understand that people don’t want to be called or thought of as “racist”. But actions speak louder than words. So if I protest an illegal, wrongful act, and I call out the doer of that act, and somebody calls me a “racist” I honestly do not give a good kitty.

    • Donovan Nuera says

      May 27, 2015 at 9:51 pm

      The town should be called henceforce “Rottenhamistan”….pass it on!

  17. Paul says

    May 27, 2015 at 6:59 pm

    I had been encouraged by the emergence of various anti-Muhammadan
    groups here in the UK and their increasing support (and it is happening).
    On the other hand, stories like this really exasperate me – not so much
    the tactics that are being employed (they don’t surprise me one bit), but
    rather the fact that the people of Rotherham were stupid enough to
    re-elect a bunch of perverted Cultural Marxists at the elections who hold them
    in such deep contempt. Sadly, they’ll just have to go through the whole thing
    again.

    • Linde Barrera says

      May 27, 2015 at 11:03 pm

      To Paul- Would you, as an Englishman, be kind enough to give your honest opinion to me? Do you see The Church of England changing it’s name to the Church of Jesus Christ, and completely separating itself from the government/state, not being granted any tax benefits to people who attend and tithe, SO THAT no one religion/church/mosque/synagogue can claim equal parity, thereby creating separation between church and state AND disallowing any funds from ANY government to pay for new churches/mosques/synagogues? I am wondering if this is feasible?

      • ecosse1314 says

        May 28, 2015 at 5:38 am

        Linda whilst I appreciate your efforts I have to tell you that you are flogging a dead horse. The queen and her dysfunctional family have extremely limited powersin the UK and quite frankly the C of E is regarded as a joke.

        • Linde Barrera says

          May 28, 2015 at 11:21 am

          To ecosse1314- I love your moniker, it’s mysterious! Thank you for your comment about my letter to the Queen of England. I am glad I tried. And if nothing else comes of it, I can say I spent some of my hard earned pension on postage stamps, and doing that helps the US Post Office!

        • ecosse1314 says

          May 28, 2015 at 12:04 pm

          Thanks Linda ecosse is simply french for Scotland and 1314 is a key date in Scottish history. As I said don’t hope too much from Lizzie Battenburg.

        • Linde Barrera says

          May 28, 2015 at 12:45 pm

          To ecosse1314- Thank you for your explanation. And I never heard the Queen of England referred to as “Lizzie Battenburg”! In the 1960’s there was a tv show called “The Honeymooners” with Jackie Gleason and Audrey Meadows. When Audrey Meadows as wife Alice got a bit too cheeky with her husband Ralph (Jackie Gleason) he used to say to her: “You’re a riot, Alice”. May I say that to you? Lol.

        • ecosse1314 says

          May 28, 2015 at 1:39 pm

          During WW 1 all the royals and nobility anglicised their names. The house Saxe-Coburg Gotha changed their name to Windsor. Phil the Greek Mountbattens original name was Battenburg. So all lizzies and phils children are all little battenburgs.

      • Paul says

        May 28, 2015 at 9:23 am

        I can see where you’re coming from with that suggestion, but
        it wouldn’t really make any difference to the money pouring in
        from Saudi-Arabia and mosques sprouting up everywhere, as
        well as our corrupt elites turning a blind eye to this and the
        hate preachers that operate in them. However, this won’t always
        be the case. I believe that when Iran get their nuclear weapons
        that will be the end of Saudi-Arabia (you might laugh now!).
        As for the Church, I think that they should be more bold and
        reach out to Muslims more and speak out against the persecution
        of Christians and be politically active. Instead, they seem to be
        more bothered in this “we all believe in the same god” crap and
        ‘interfaith’ dialogue (Muslim monologue) nonsense. I noticed bishop
        Michael Nazir-Ali addressed many of these issues and they got
        shut of him. Simply not good enough right now.

        • Linde Barrera says

          May 28, 2015 at 12:03 pm

          To Paul- Thank you very much for your input to my questions. It sounds like nearly all the people in power in great Britain look upon and treat the British people as if they are mindless robots and must swallow whatever mush is given them. What happened to critical thinking? And the thought that government is only there to do what the citizens can’t do for themselves, such as build roads, schools, hospitals, etc? Seems surreal and sad. I do disagree with you on one point. I think when push comes to shove, Iran will not nuke Saudi Arabia because they advocate for Islam, no matter what Muslim sect they are. I think Iran has its eye on other spots that they term “lands of the infidels”. I think you catch my drift. Hope I am wrong though.

      • Paul says

        May 28, 2015 at 2:54 pm

        Hi Linde, it’s true that a nuclear Iran is a huge threat to other
        countries, but you can’t underestimate the animosity that exists
        between Iran and Saudi-Arabia – sunni vs shia, shia vs wahabi etc.,
        and the fact that Saudi-Arabia is despised in the Muslim world owing
        to the ‘unislamic’ lifestyle of their royal family, and so on.
        Ever wondered about the “prostitute” that sits on many waters (peoples,
        nations, multitudes and languages) in Revelation which is drunk on the
        blood of the saints, and her eventual destruction?
        Saudi’s chickens will come home to roost, this video puts it so well :

        • Linde Barrera says

          May 28, 2015 at 8:45 pm

          To Paul- Thank you for that link regarding our discussion about Iran and Saudi Arabia. I will watch it after reading all the day’s JW comments.

  18. Kepha says

    May 27, 2015 at 8:34 pm

    I smell a very unholy alliance between Muslims who think Western women and children fair game and Western sexual revolutionaries. I wonder how long it will be before people like Frank Lombard are “socially acceptable”?

  19. keith says

    May 27, 2015 at 10:18 pm

    The Brits and their culture are headed toward oblivion, whereby Sharia law will replace English laws, traditions & customs. That’s too bad. Having lived in London, I can say the Brits are a charming people, and why they would allow their culture to be pre-empted by sub-human Muslims is a total mystery to me…

  20. Matthieu Baudin says

    May 27, 2015 at 10:25 pm

    …“Due to their regularity there is a real perception amongst people using the town that it is not safe, and that there are protests every Saturday… The town needs to move on and further events will be damaging both to community cohesion, and the ability of the town to recover”…

    Dear U.K. brothers and sisters, if public demonstrations are forcibly suspended or banned in Rotherham then move the protests to London. This travesty to the rights of children is a scandal concerning all Europe and there could be no better place for it to be brought to light than in London itself, for all the world to take notice. This practice of ‘looking the other way,’ by otherwise respected agency personnel, is a curse that very likely will be exposed in other European States. Keep up the heat, through peaceful civil action, to protect the ‘life and limb’ of the children of Europe.

    • Linde Barrera says

      May 27, 2015 at 10:49 pm

      To Matthieu Baudin- Excellent recommendation. Wish I could go there, gather signatures on a petition, file for permits for the protests, and present all to Queen Elizabeth. I am certain she would see that it benefits the crown to assist the victims and their families. She can’t be that cold.

    • kevin says

      May 28, 2015 at 5:51 am

      your right the protests should be moved to London all protests of this type should be and the british people should go in their millions to bring London to a stand still them the govmt would have to act or see London lose billions every weekend, it no good half hearted messures be peaceful in protesting yes but do not be afraid of govmt or police as if you do nothing other than march with others you cant be touched no matter what police say to frighten you

    • Angemon says

      May 28, 2015 at 8:33 am

      Matthieu Baudin posted:

      “Dear U.K. brothers and sisters, if public demonstrations are forcibly suspended or banned in Rotherham then move the protests to London.”

      That’ a very good idea, MB.

  21. Hank says

    May 27, 2015 at 10:51 pm

    Can not the British people stand and occupy the spaces where the crimes happen? The constant vigilant presence of observers would prevent the evil people from freely conducting their activities.

  22. tilda says

    May 27, 2015 at 11:35 pm

    People are marching because they want various authorities to do something. Unfortunately, it seems that various government authorities have failed or are compromised.

    Historically, criminal prosecutions in the UK were private prosecutions. As far as I know, that right still exists in the UK. (I don’t know much about the details).

    If private criminal prosecutions are possible in these circumstances, then setting up a private prosecution service might be more useful than marching and waiting for the government to do its job.

    It would take some savvy and committed people to set it up, and they’d need a fighting fund. (But I think people within the UK and from around the world would donate to it.)

  23. gravenimage says

    May 28, 2015 at 1:58 am

    Writing to the Home Secretary Theresa May, commissioner complained it was the protests, rather than the problem the town has with child rape that was causing reputational damage:
    …………………………………..

    So—child rape and its enabling is not a problem, but protesting against child rape *is*?

    More:

    “Over an extended period, the town has been subject to a significant number of events by right-wing groups, and counter demonstrations by left wing groups.
    …………………………………..

    So, you have groups protesting child rape, and…what? Groups protesting the protest of child rape? *My God*.

  24. William Lucas Harvey Jr. says

    May 28, 2015 at 2:39 am

    “City that covered up Muslim rape gangs wants to ban anti-child rape protests – several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought as racist”.

    THIS IS the TYPICAL Muslim, ALWAYS Whining “Racist”. “Bigot”, and “Islamophobic”. Wants to Forbid the TRUTH from Being told when it applies to “Atrocities” that are committed by Mislims, in the Name of Islam, Allah, Muhammed, and the Qur’an.

  25. Laura says

    May 28, 2015 at 5:40 am

    Britain, or England, to give it its real name, should deport the parents and grandparents of all convicted child rapists and those guilty of other serious crimes. Then when the convicted criminals are released from prison, they go straight to Pakistan, with no appeals allowed.
    If we do this, and keep on doing it, they will get the message that if they disrespect us they will be removed from this beautiful island.

    • ecosse1314 says

      May 28, 2015 at 9:32 am

      Laura. What on earth do you mean by “England to give itits real name”. Are you saying that Scotland Wales and N.Ireland don’t exist?

    • ecosse1314 says

      May 28, 2015 at 9:38 am

      Btw Laura England isn’t an island but merely one of three countries that occupy an island. Hope this helps.

    • voegelinian says

      May 28, 2015 at 2:53 pm

      Indeed.

  26. Philip Smeeton says

    May 28, 2015 at 6:31 am

    There is only one solution to the problems we are facing as a result of uncontrolled immigration and that is deportation of criminals and their entire families. All of theses ingrates have a homeland we can send them to. We have to protect our homeland or lose it forever.

    • voegelinian says

      May 28, 2015 at 2:55 pm

      It doesn’t matter if they have a homeland in our sense of the word; all Muslims have an Umma and a Dar-al-Islam, and any number of the Muslim majority countries that in their minds form part of their Dar-al-Islam will do as a deposit box to send Muslims to.

      • particolor says

        May 28, 2015 at 6:10 pm

        Rule 1… Kick sand in the Infidels face !!

      • TheBuffster says

        May 29, 2015 at 10:25 am

        Thanks, Linde. I certainly am happy that there will be prosecutions.

        • Linde Barrera says

          May 29, 2015 at 11:29 am

          To The Buffster- Like you, I am very happy to know that there will be prosecutions, finally. And here’s a quick story to show you the opposite. I know a guy who was 30. He met a girl in a club and dated her for about 9 months. Sex was consensual. She initially told him at the club she was 18, but she was actually 17 and admitted later on to possessing a fake ID. I seriously doubt that he would have had any interest if he knew she was a minor. Long story short, after this guy broke up with her, this girl’s mom brought him up on charges of statutory rape. And guess what? He served jail time, even though the girl admitted she lied about her age. In hindsight, I guess guys should do a background check. Take care.

        • TheBuffster says

          May 29, 2015 at 11:49 am

          Linde, that’s horrible!

          A man shouldn’t do time for having been lied to by a 17 year old with a fake ID. A 17-year-old tends to look remarkably like an 18-year-old, anyhow. How much investigation is a guy expected to do? The girl came closer to committing a crime than the guy she fooled.

          Background check, indeed.

          I hope there’s more to this story than you know. I hate to take on more evidence of the downfall of ethical intelligence in the world.

        • Linde Barrera says

          May 29, 2015 at 2:00 pm

          To The Buffster- Hi again! I wrote everything I learned about that statutory rape sentence, but do not know details. Just the main idea and conclusion.

  27. Glen says

    May 29, 2015 at 7:00 pm

    I was utterly gobsmacked when I learnt that a majority of moronic, brain dead zombies voted Liebour back in for Rotherham! But It didn’t come as a surprise when I really thought about it and when you understand what has happened in many towns in Northern England under the governance of liebour councils.

    Many of these people are now institutionalized, they are so dependent on the welfare lifeline and bullshit austerity and multicutural lies that liebour feed them every day that they can do nothing even when their kids are raped on a mass scale, they are like smack heads waiting for their next fix.

    The worse thing is that they actually believe that only liebour will save them from the tory/rich/bankers abyss that we all face, yet they have lived in the same squalor all of their lives and always will because it’s in liebour’s interest to keep these people living in fear and with no ambition or hope…without that there would be no need for a liebour party. The Scots have realized that liebour will do nothing for them, I can’t see the English who believe in liebour doing the same.

    I feel sorry for the kids who were raped by the muslim rape gangs but I have no sympathy for the people who allowed it to happen, they are part of the problem and the whole system needs to be destroyed, the lefty socialists who despise this country need to be destroyed and the scum who perpetrated these crimes need to be destroyed.

    The UK is in a very parlous state, we saw the feelings of the silent majority during the recent General election yet it’s still the bbc and the lefty media who have the loudest voices when it comes to what the country needs and the won’t stop until their ideology is fully implemented, Douglas Carswell and Nigel Farage have experienced what the lefty fascists will do if you don’t comply with their aims yet paedophiles are treated as normal.

    How long will it be before the fight back starts and they face the same aggressive tactics they employ? It’s all leading to one thing, the build up has started, just like pre WWII, and not even the prospect of Armageddon will stop the progressives from their path.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • gravenimage on Erdogan: ‘Turks must defend the rights of Jerusalem, even with their lives’ for ‘the honor of the Islamic nation’
  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship
  • gravenimage on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • James Lincoln on Iranian Kurdistan: Muslim brothers behead their sister in honor killing over her romantic relationship

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.