In the face of a national scandal revolving around Muslim rape gangs, the UK police counsel…surrender. More dhimmitude from Abject Britannia: “UK Police Tell Subjects Not to Harm Their Attackers, Get a Rape Alarm,” NRA-ILA, May 29, 2015 (thanks to Tarn):
The latest dispatch from the United Kingdom’s ongoing campaign to eliminate all forms of armed self-defense seems too incredible to be true. Unfortunately, after tracking down the origin of a publicly distributed statement regarding self-defense products on the country’s “Ask the Police” website, we can confirm that British subjects continue to live at the mercy of their potential attackers. Even to the point of baffling absurdity.
The statement appears in the Frequently Asked Questions section of www.askthe.police.uk – a site that is operated by the Police National Legal Database. Information provided by the PNLD and its site are used by local police constabularies to help inform the public.
The question at issue asks, “Are there any legal self defence products that I can buy?” Succinctly epitomizing the sad state of natural rights in Great Britain, the first sentence states, “The only fully legal self defence product at the moment is a rape alarm.”
And to add even more insult to human dignity, the statement cautions subjects against the use of nearly any other type of defense product, and reads like an appeal for victims to graciously suffer criminal violence. The answer makes clear “You must not get a product which is made or adapted to cause a person injury. Possession of such a product in public (and in private in specific circumstances) is against the law.” So even in the sanctity of one’s home, the statement seems to suggest that care for violent offenders outweighs the rights of potential victims to be safe and secure against attack.
The statement then addresses the legality of inert dye sprays that merely mark one’s attacker for later identification; in contrast to self-defense sprays like mace or pepper spray that inflict pain in order to halt an attack. The site is so concerned with the well-being of violent criminals, that in the context of dye sprays, it states,“be aware that even a seemingly safe product, deliberately aimed and sprayed in someone’s eyes, would become an offensive weapon because it would be used in a way that was intended to cause injury.”
Whether it’s this detestable advice, police warning a woman not to display a knife in order to ward off intruders, warrantless firearm storage inspections, or desperate subjects being forced to defend their lives and property with cricket and baseball bats during riots, the UK government appears intent on wiping out any remaining vestiges of the traditional right to self-defense. We’d like to say that we won’t allow ourselves to be shocked by the next ludicrous episode from across the pond, but history shows they’ll somehow manage to astound.
Chabuco says
Duck, cover, pee and vomit! http://is.gd/x6u9ul
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2013/02/colorado-college-advises-students-to-urinate-vomit-to-stop-rapists/
Angemon says
What good is a rape alarm if anyone hearing it goes “By law I’m not allowed to bear arms. Criminals, by definition, don’t abide by the law. Even if there’s only one attacker he’ll probably be armed. Right, I’ll call the police and hope they can get here on time”?
mortimer says
The law officers of England have not protected these girls from Muslim pedophile gangs nor have they investigated and charged the suspects in a timely manner…dragging their feet until the public outcry forced them to dig deep and fast! Shame!
Why should British women have any confidence in the police now? They shouldn’t.
Legal or not, women should arm themselves and take their chance of being acquitted if they hurt one of those scum. However, they should be sure first that the suspect doesn’t turn the weapon on them.
Joke: Why do Muslim pedophiles cry during sex? Answer: The mace.
somehistory says
Unreal. The beast from satan is just being handed the power, not even having to fight for it.
mortimer says
They look like werewolves and act like werewolves. They are beasts.
Skunk spray would mark them…they are skunks.
somehistory says
Defend yourself with a frying pan and when the cops come to investigate your crime of self-defense, tell them you offered to fry up some tasty bacon and he ran into the pan with his head.
clap says
Do they offer womens self-defense classes in the UK?
somehistory says
IDK. If they do, they may run into trouble if the self-defense is meant to hurt the perp to keep them from succeeding in raping and injuring the victim. If they can’t *brandish* a knife, they must come up with something they can use that hasn’t been listed already as a crime of self-defense weapon because it may injury the criminal.
If spraying might hurt the eyes, how about a poking of the finger in the eyes?
The *legal* system in that country is sinking in the mire of this beast when the victim is not allowed to hurt the criminal by use of defensive actions only. Insanity.
gravenimage says
More women in the UK *are* taking self-defense classes, which is a good sign.
But I notice from this article in the Daily Mail that there is no reference to actual self-defense—the focus is entirely on deterrence, which is pretty unlikely if a woman is dealing with a Muslim rapist.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-145322/Which-self-defence-lessons-right-you.html
Joseph says
@ somehistory ” tell them you offered to fry up some tasty bacon and he ran into the pan with his head.”
_____________________________________________________________________________
Do you think they will believe he bashed his head 43 times??
Maybe he did it for Allen?
somehistory says
He’s very devout.
mortimer says
He seemed starved for bacon and ran into the pan many times.
Michael Warden says
Rather like the quote from the film Chicago.
” He ran into my knife. He ran into my knife ten times ! “.
Or perhaps :
” I fired a warning shot. Right into his head “.
Anna says
This isn’t new. I’m British. Forty years ago a schoolfriend’s dad surprised a burglar in the family home. After a tussle
he overcame the the burglar, while his wife called the police. In the course of the tussle the burglar suffered a fractured arm. When the police turned up to arrest him he winked at my friend’s dad, and said, “I’m a gent, guvnor, I won’t be bringing charges”.
Bindon Blood says
Actually despite what people think he wouldn’t be able to because there would be no case to answer. A broken arm is GBH and the police can prosecute in their own right. The fact that they didn’t shows there was no case to answer.
Westman says
It appears the UK has already capitulated to women being second class citizens. The Fundametalist rapists will interpret this as a green light. And what will the “police” do when it becomes rape and killing? Protect them?
The idea that police can protect anyone without prior knowledge of an event is truly laughable. The Garland Cartoon Contest organizers wisely prepared in advance for the possibility of Jihadists. What if there had been no security detail and police there? We would be reading about pursuit, capture, and conviction – after the fact of crime – which is what happens most often.
There is no protection for any spontaneous crime unless we and our companions can provide it without notice. I’ve never appreciated the NRA until ISIS and European Muslim thuggery. I’m glad I live in a country where if some scum attempts to rape a woman, she could kill him and be aquitted. Of course, if it was a Muslim rapist, there would be demonstrations and signs like, “Rapists Lives Matter”.
Januk36 says
It’s good to live in Switzerland and having an automatic rifle, a full mag of ammunition and plenty more from the local shooters association.
I didn’t appreciate before that it testifies the civilty of an society rather then the contrary, when a government can afford to hand out weapons.
Westman says
Januk,
Greetings.
Yes, it additionally testifies that the government is there to serve and not to rule the citizens, and it trusts them to maintain order according the rules by which they, by common consent, have agreed.
Quite a contrast to Islam: “Yes, we must make this distinction. The one who rejects the law of Allaah and casts it aside, and replaces it with man-made laws and the opinions of individuals has committed an act of kufr which puts him beyond the pale of Islam.” –Shaykh ‘Abd-Allaah al-Ghunaymaan
Islam is seditious by command. The UK government is criminal in its neglect of citizens who obey the law while bowing to Islamists who have no fealty for the country or its laws.
Kepha says
Here in the States we’ve got to buy our own guns.
spot on says
This is unbelievably sick. Sharpen and hone those kitchen knives. Also what is a “Rape Alarm”.?
Westman says
In the UK a “Rape Alarm” seems to be when a rape victim crawls up the steps of a police station.
jayell says
I think what they’re saying is that carrying an ‘offensive weapon’ i.e., anything that can be deemed to be designed to cause damage/injury) is illegal in the UK, therefore the agents of Law and Order can hardly be seen to encourage people to break the law.
However, this law was theoretically waived for Sikhs, who are apparently culturally obliged knives with them, although I believe that said ‘cultural’ knives were supposed to be merely ‘symbolic’ and therefore strictly limited in size and lethal potential. However, I have never heard of a test case on the matter brought to court. Likewise, it became legally compulsory many years ago for motor cyclists to wear crash helmets, but – yet again – Sikhs were let off this one because of their turbans. It was never made clear whether or not Sikhs would consequently have to pay higher motorcycle insurance premiums as a result of a predictably higher risk of injury in accidents. Also, there is, as a matter of security, a clearly expressed prohibition in certain public places (retail outlets, banks, etc.) against the wearing of motorcycle helmets or any other face-coverings, and those who don’t comply are ordered to remove said helmets, etc., or leave the premises. Strangely, when it comes to muslim women wearing those ‘mask’ things over their faces wherever they feel like it, no one ever does or says a thing!
Two things come to mind. 1. Regarding ‘offensive weapons’, the assumption seems to be that, in a civilised, law-abiding society, the likelihood of needing an ‘offensive weapon’ to defend oneself should be minimal, especially if is highly unlikely that anyone else will be carrying an ‘offensive weapon’. Now, once upon a time, British society was ‘British’ society and it WAS civilised and law-abiding, but……we all know the rest! 2. It would appear that certain accepted conventions, rules and regulations relating to standards of public conduct in the UK are deemed to be strictly optional as far as certain relatively newly-arrived (and apparently ‘specially privileged’) elements in the UK are concerned, and raising any objection on any grounds, no matter how reasonable or logical, is strictly ‘verboten’ on pain of receiving a visit from the Thought Police – or even the Real Police.
So there you are, ladies. Being molested, assaulted or even raped in public is the necessary sacrifice you have to make for the privilege of living in our wonderful UK rainbow utopia, but they will allow you a fighting chance by permitting you the privilege of carrying a little battery-powered plastic thing that makes a (hopefully) loud noise or maybe carry a little bell and shout ‘help’ as everyone ignores you.
Mr. Singh says
Just to clarify. Sikhs have no objection to everyone being allowed to not wear a motorcycle helmet, or to be allowed to carry a small dagger. The authorities however want to curtail people’s rights, but Sikhs are fighting for the right to do this under freedom of religion.
You should also know that Sikhs in Canada fought for the right of a Scottish high school student to wear a kilt to graduation as part of his cultural identity.
Kepha says
I also understand that a Sikh is “armed” with his obligatory dagger if it’s a little brass toggle on his key chain perhaps a quarter of an inch long.
jayell says
A little brass toggle on a key chain clearly is NO issue since it hardly poses any danger as an offensive weapon and therefore does not compromise the UK position on offensive weapons and safety in public places – so long as ‘a small toggle’ is all it is.
Motorcycle helmets are another matter, though. The UK legislation on this matter was intended to guarantee a level of social responsibility amongst motorcyclists so that they would minimise the risk of serious head injury to themselves in the not unlikely event of an accident, and therefore lessen the burden that they would place on the health services, social security and family. It can be rightly argued that failure to take steps to minimise injury in activities such as motorcycling amounts to gross irresponsibility, and any argument that this has something to do with ‘human rights’ is equally irresponsible and really quite irrelevant. The only possible justification for taking this position would be that those taking known unnecessary risks take total responsibility for any negative outcome by themselves and do not expect others, or ‘society’ to carry the can for them – hence increased insurance premiums if they insist on not wearing helmets when riding motorcycles. This kind of thing is not just limited to motorcycling. There is also an increasing body of opinion that pedal cyclists should do likewise, and in the construction industry has strict regulations about the wearing of hard hats on building sites.
The wearing of kilts or other ‘unusual’ items of clothing at public events in no way presents a public or personal safety problem and is therefore really quite trivial and irrelevant compared with the ‘helmet’ issue. I am surprised to see Mr Singh attempting to use this a justification for not wearing helmets in hazardous conditions. Certainly here in the UK there has never been any problem about wearing articles of clothing for ‘cultural’ reasons, so long as they do not breach the law of public decency. And I have never known any Scots persons who has needed any support in asserting their cultural rights!
Gary says
But wait?! Muhammad this! Muhammad that! “THE PROPHET” this… “THE PROPHET” that….
He was such a……” Ladies man” Surely he was speaking for Almighty God? Surely he had women’s rights in mind when God spoke to him? Surely “There is no god but allah, and “You know who” is his messenger?
Meanwhile. Back to reality……
“The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy. For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.”
Colossians 1:15-20
Darren says
Paging the feminist movement paging the feminist movement you have some very real women’s right issues here. The treatment of women in the Middle East, and the treatment of women under sharia is a very real and terrible problem. Dear Hollywood and feminist movement people where is your outrage? Your silence is deafening. Maybe we will see a mass exodus of women from the U.K since they can’t defend themselves from muslim rape gangs. If you see a women being raped do your best to protect them, screw the insane U.K government. When they take you to court call every media network in the world, make it a major P.R issue for the U.K government. The headline can read man defends women being savagely raped now faces criminal charges for defending innocent rape victim. It will be a P.R nightmare of epic proportions.
Alissa says
Good luck with that. “Feminists” are like celebrities. They want attention and adoration. If they have to put their butts on the line, they are silent. Crickets.
We have to get organized. Brigitte Gabriel’s organization ACT for America, is a great place to start and use to model our own organizations. But we really have to focus on our own locale. Really to make any kind of lasting impression we have to organize in every political unit within our own neighbourhoods. These differ in name from one country to another. Burrows to ridings to school divisions to provinces etc…however your particular area structures itself politically. We need small groups in each division to attend school board meetings and keep current on what is being put into our school curriculum, attend court sessions, take courses at universities in muslim studies and political studies, get involved in Muslim Students organizations, etc etc.so we know first hand what is going on. Muslims are very active in steath jihad in order to destroy our “miserable house”. There are many areas for us to get involved and gather information and stand against the ongoing growth of muslim political power in our societies. Ring the bells.
The best demographic to do this are the retired pensioners (baby boomers) because 1) there are lots of them, 2) they don’t have to risk losing their jobs since they are retired, and 3) they have the time to do it. Also and most importantly, politicians care about votes and there is a huuuuge retired population. The baby boomers make up a decisive portion of the voting population and their children, the Echo generation, are also a huge demographic. The Echo generation typically have close ties to their parents and will join forces if the concerns are handled appropriately.
We need to do this for the future of our children and grandchildren. Politicians feed on votes. They will care if we act as a cohesive force. Get together with your friends and create a plan. Get t-shirts made up, placards, write letters to your political rep in your own area voicing your concern over what’s happening in your country. But most importantly, get out there and collect information and learn what really is happening in your neighbourhoods. You will be shocked….Muslims as directed by the muslim brotherhood have an organized plan to take us over. They are a lethal virus in our society. Certainly our children and grandchildren will have to live with the dire consequences of our inaction. I don’t want that and I don’t think you do either.
abad says
Normally, I’d recommend a woman being attacked/rape to kick her assailant in the nuts but seeing that Muslim males don’t have any nuts…..try a can of pepper spray instead…..
celtic warriarcanada says
Britain : ONCE A POWERFUL EMPIRE ! Now governed and policed by emasculated oversensitive males,females, and muslims. RISE UP OH CHURCHILL’S CHILDREN AND SHOW YOUR MIGHT AGAIN !
Kepha says
Did some distant relatives of mine go down in flames during the Battle of Britain so a bunch of goons could terrorize British women and girls at will? Did some uncles of mine get shot at from North Africa to Italy to Iran (by our good Soviet “Allies” when delivering supplies through that last-named occupied country) so Europe could supinely allow itself to be mentally raped by the Soviets then physically raped by Muslims?
gravenimage says
Hear, hear, Kepha!
Michael Warden says
Yes. It is all in the name of Social Cohesion, Diversity and Multiculturalism. My father got lucky, he managed to survive Bomber Command ( i in 4 of his comrades did not), my first father in law survived Dunkirk, D Day landings and onwards without a scratch, my second father in law survived a burning Lancaster ( 5 made it out, 2 did not). These men were giants. Gods. What do we have now ? Bunch of nobodies. In it for what they can take from the system. Stuff the people as long as they can get their salaries and expenses. I used to think politicians did not care about the people. I was wrong. Politicians actually hate the people for being a nuisance, an inconvenience that has to be mollified and lied to before an election. Promise them anything just make sure they vote the right way.
thelmalou says
The UK is pathetic. In the USA we don’t stand for this nonsense. Oooh, did I get pepper spray in your eyes???! Let me get it out for you, with this BULLET.
Shmooviyet says
Does this suggestion apply to any potential rapists/attackers? Or only members of a specific origin? Do the women have to stop them to ask the attacker his religion?
Sorry, I’m gonna have to hold a grudge on this one. Treating your ‘attacker’ with understanding and respect is the last proof we need that certain UK leaders are certifiably insane, stupid, or just plain gutless.
Kepha says
Long ago, an English friend mentioned how someone witnessed the ordination of an Anglican bishop in something that looked like a football huddle. The non-Anglican witness asked what was happened. My English friend said that the ordainee was undergoing an operation to remove his backbone.
It seems that the sickness of the CofE has spread throughout British society.
Bindon Blood says
The English have got back bone,after all they faced the might of the German nation alone twice while Americans say at home and refused to allow the endangered Jews asylum. The leaders are weak andP.C but the people aren’t
Bindon Blood says
should read,Americans sat at home etc. if the English had behaved in that fashion they’d be too ashamed to start crowing.
RonaldB says
Actually, this makes a lot of sense.
Generally any government, even one as committed to the dissolution and destruction of the present culture as, say, the Obama administration appears to be, is limited in how far it can go.
The solution for the government is the use of street gangs, street violence, and random acts of individual terrorism. This serves to weaken societal bindings, and give the government more opportunity to strengthen its control over the law-abiding remnant. Not coincidentally, this is also the first state of Muslim jihad, called “dawah”, where the focus is on the dissolution of confidence in the ability of the government to protect them. Dawah is often, though not always, non-violent. It’s a tactical decision.
The street gangs are acting in the government’s interest, but maintain a distance of deniability.
Weapons owned by individuals are unlikely to be of much use against the organized force of the government, despite the claims of gun rights people, who say guns are the last defense against a tyranny. But, guns are extremely useful to protect against street gangs and individual violence, particularly if people organize in self-defense groups.
Hence, the strong emphasis by the government on suppressing any means of self-defense. It is not to protect the government, but to protect the street gangs that are advancing the work of the government, which is devoted to dissolving, rather than preserving, the traditional culture. Needless to say, the government has no interest at all in protecting individual, law-abiding citizens.
Renee says
According to Dutch Minister Donner you are also allowed to shout “BOOOOOH!” to defend yourself and klap loudly in your hands.
marblenecltr says
UK is run by “royals” and the somehow elected that lack common sense, wisdom, courage, and concern for their responsibilities. Prince Charles, in line as king of the UK and head of the Church of England, is reluctant to be called by the title traditional to this date, Defender of the Faith. He prefers Defender of Faith, even one that causes people to rape, murder, and enslave his loyal citizens.
The Bilderberg meeting is to take place soon, the first part of June in Austria, and the British and other royals will be there. I expect the presence of David Rockefeller to celebrate his 100th birthday June 12, and seekers of public office in the US there to be vetted. What will DR receive as his birthday present? The Jade Helm 15 motto reflects the goal of globalists, Master the Human Domain. Everywhere.
Victor Redlick says
The first fools who should be sprayed with inert dye are the police who abide by this progressive – Bill of the Attackers’ Rights – codswallop and any jurist who would uphold such absurdity; when a victim is in the throes of rape or assault. The public has got to know who these enabling and hypocritical purveyors of lawlessness are; so what better form of unmistakeable identity than permanent DayGlo on their faces and hands?
Rob says
I’m sure these girls are allowed to ‘open carry’ their alarm, so it isn’t all bad news LOL!
Stick It Up Your Jacksie says
The cops here in the UK are taking that many backwards steps, they are regressing to clown status as in the Keystone Cops. Personally slicing these miscreants heads off being as they have a penchant for doing that, to me is justified. The cops are governed by our lily-livered, limp dick tossers in power, and all are totally unfit for purpose!
Ephesian says
Amen to that!
George Bemer says
These Muslim creeps have been taught from childhood that they can do anything they want including rape, kidnapping, torture, & murder. It’s a Mohammed thing…that’s what he did!
Jack HOLAN says
When the Police stop enforcing the Law or taking reports and processing them in compliance with their protocol and the Justice System is failing a segment of society You Must protect your most important asset; your life and body.
I urge ex-servicemen trained in the use of edged weapons to train woman on a free basis and basic hand to hand combat. Woman worry about legality after the fact with an Attorney. At least you will be alive and whole.
bernie says
The women and girls should be trained in Karate, Tang Soo Do, Krav Maga or any other useful martial art; then, if these Islamofascist, misogynist thugs try to rape them, they can kick them in the balls so hard they their nards come flying out of their mouths.
Badbob says
What do you call a county that submits their wives and sisters and daughters…hummm…well what the gang rape gangs call that country…Pu$$¥$ with a laugh.
Badbob says
Not Great Britain anymore…..yeah that’s what come rape us means…right?
ffinder says
New Name: Rape Britain ! ! ! !
Welcome to Rape Britain where you may be
gang raped freely by muslims anywhere, anytime they like ! !
and please don’t harm them..
they are so precious to us for destroying you
for the rest of your life . .
Some people do not have brains in there heads..
ff
Joseph says
My favorite “rape alarm” goes BANG
Arthur says
Love your comment!
Cameron says
The laws will only change when the prime ministers Police chiefs Chief Justices wife’s families get raped bashed murdered
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
I had to look up what a “rape alarm” is, and who it is supposed to alarm.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=rape+alarm&ia=products
So a rape alarm is just a noisemaker?
And why are scimitars prohibited? Banning the Prophet’s favorite weapon is anti-Islamic bigotry.
Arthur says
I heard that a rape alarm is a device that goes off whenever in the proximity of a rapist. My understanding is that there are huge numbers of faulty returns because all the alarms in Rotherham went off constantly as soon as the batteries were inserted.
There are complaints that this is a rising tide of rapistophobia which must be stopped before right-wing bigot extremists endanger the lives of innocent rapists.
Remember: When seconds count, the police are only minutes away!
Went to the shooting range today and got in some good practice with the .45 Colt semi-automatic–was able to hit the 10-inch target consistently at 73 feet (very pleased with my progress). My >70 year old mom also put about 50 rounds through and hit a perfect bullseye at 15 feet! I’m so happy to live in the USA!!!
Bill Poser says
A woman who injures her attacker should just claim that he wanted rough sex.
Matthieu Baudin says
Family members, friends and associates have a moral duty to defend anyone threatened with violence including rape and the right to self defence in these circumstances is sacrosanct. While the police fearlessly issue policy statements and compile crime reports, citizens at all times have a central role in preventing sexual assaults and protecting life and limb.
Carlos Malleum says
Many of these swivel eyed and decidedly un British laws have crept into our legislation since 2000 when we tore up our ancient and sovereign freedoms and laws and submitted to the ECHR
Any criminal who wishes to harm our lives or property will have a cricket bat applied to his head as hard as possible, alternatively they can have a conversation with our Mastiff.
The police have shown themselves more interested in political policing and have failed the subjects of this country.
When the state fails it’s citizens they have little choice but to take matters into their own hards.
Ke n Baskin says
Ah, but this is called diversity. Welcome it, embrace it, encourage it – otherwise you are a racist or a bigot
madatinjustice says
I totally agree with you Carlos! -And I also agree with you Jonathan! Pedophiles and the like are depraved and sick people -even if they say this is a part of their “religion”. “It’s All Totally Sick” -and they deserve to be put to death for their sicknesses… (there (isn’t any cure) for people like this) because this is what they like to do and what they -want to do- to innocents! Put them in the gas chamber (like Hitler did to the Jews) and let them die a horrible slow death! -is what I say! Hitler was crazy/sick/mad and on drugs -he killed Jews just because they were Jews and in the name of his cause… -his perfect race of “white people”! Can we learn anything from the past and can we defeat what is wrong and replace it with what’s right and just for everyone..? This is the question…….. How will we respond when it’s bold, unrelenting and “in our faces” ?
Bindon Blood says
The police and judiciary seem to have forgotten that they don’t own the law ,it belongs to the citizens.In reality the police have very few extra powers concerning arresting criminals than the general public. All indictable offences with a 5 years or more prison sentence are offences which any person may arrest for. Any common law offence has a power of arrest for any person to apply. Any person can arrest a drunk and disorderly person. The police don’t like the general public knowing this. As long as one does not use excessive ,unwarranted force one is acting within the law. The law is there to protect the people ,not as some obscure,arcane mystery to be discussed and picked over by lawyers. If it doesn’t protect the people and give them justice it is pointless. Judges have forgotten this and the police are often incredibly ignorant with regards to the law and their powers. Police in Britain are civilians,not military;they are citizens like anybody else. The Police force was designed that way so as not to oppress the people,as in France. This is being forgotten.
Georgina says
@Carlos Malleum
While I agree that a cricket bat is more ‘British’, I recommend a baseball bat for women, it is easier to swing and has less air resistance.
As to the police, they are merely enforcing laws put out by very stupid men who think that human rights for crooks are are more important than a wonan’s right to defend herself, so: sod that.
Georgina says
note bene to women:
When swinging the baseball bat, swing low. A blow to the head is hard/next to impossible to achieve – broken knee caps will stop an attacker and a horizontal swing gives you more force.
That was taught me by the British police’s self defence for women class – back in 1980 when we still had equal rights.
Robby says
Good advice Georgina, thanks.
Marty says
In the UK we pride ourselves (unwisely in my opinion) on our general tolerance, and in particular our religious tolerance.
These muslim child rapists are simply devout mainstream muzlims following their long established
“faith” demands..
According to the broadcaster LBC, in the UK year 2014 -15 the Church of England lost over one million attendees. Nearly a million new muzlims were recorded.
Since the demographics are not on our side, women should be encouraged to submit to mohammedan rapists and seek medical treatment afterwards.
“Islam” mens submission, and here in the UK we are probably the world’s leading exponents.
Being colonised peacefully by an inferior civilisation is quite an intersting experience.
eib says
The UK has no religious tolerance for Catholics, and only a minimum for Jews. The Muslims do not bring with them just a religion, but a political system that will undermine and destroy your own. You imagine a nonexistent catholic threat, and surrender to Islam. Common sense, anyone?
Marty says
England may have feared Catholicism a couple of centuries ago, when our old enemy, France, was seen a a Catholic nation, even after 1789.
In the 20th century, the English view of Catholics and Jews has been to be unaware of their existence (save in extreme cases).
The real English, (I’m one), do not peer into men’s souls, but like our greatest monarch,
Elizabeth the First, keep religion and politics separate.
If any version of religion, be it Christian, Mohammedan, Judaism, Hindu, whatever, decides it is our enemy and seeks to destroy us for political power, then like any serious nation, we should fight it and neutralise it.
particolor says
Its not that the have Quit their religion at all !! The reason is that they don’t want to be in that Church when those Barbarians decide its time to Start on Your Churches !! As is the case in other Country’s they Invade !! 🙁
jo says
If you are colonized by someone they are superior. It is violence that has defined superiority since time began…Losers are inferior.
jaki daniels says
i have a baseball bat at side of my bed .god help anyone who breaks in to my house if im in .because im not afraid to use it either .i live alone
particolor says
I also have a Bottle of Jack Daniel’s Handy that I will waste on their Head if I cant find the Base Ball Bat !! 🙂
Douglas Sydney Australia says
Australians also enjoy the inalienable right to be a victim.
Residents of New South Wales have been given some legal protection when in their homes and businesses.
Specifically: Clause 10 codifies the onus of proof where self-defence, along with the defence of others or property, is at issue. In short, the prosecution will bear the onus of disproving the defence beyond reasonable doubt, once it has been raised by the accused. When self-defence is raised, the defendant must genuinely raise the issue in evidence. Once the defendant has done so, the obligation is then on the prosecution to disprove the defence beyond reasonable doubt. It should be understood that once the defendant has raised the issue of self-defence, he or she does not need to prove anything.
This 1998 change was due to The Shooters Party former Senator J Tingle ( now The Shooters and Fishers Party)
Outside the home we go about our daily lives with the naive self assurance that we are safe due to the main stream media’s propaganda that we have the best firearm legislation in the world. And yet hardly a week goes by in Sydney or Melbourne when someone is shot, usually criminal on criminal.
particolor says
Yes I’ve noticed !! I turn the Telly on in the morning to get the Score !!
Wayne Lewis says
I can look forward to this: As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness: United States — Muslim 1.0% Australia — Muslim 1.5% Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.
They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. ( United States ).
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris –car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).
Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%
After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%
At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:
Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:
Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:
Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%
Marty says
Wayne, your general thesis is spot on.
I have seen similar predictions and they make simple common sense in the light of recent history.
However, courtesy of modern communications and transport, plus governments who fear islam and its supporters, I think your case is understated for the future.
In the UK, virtually all supermarket meat and all restaurant meat (apart from the most expensive) and most school dinner meat is halal, despite our muslim population being “only” officially about 5 million.
New Zealand lamb is popular here, and it is 100% halal, and has been for years.
There have been demands for meat labeling to include method of slaughter, but no government will give it to us.
Presumably because they don’t want to offend third world retards who vote early and vote often.
Michael Warden says
Muslim population of the UK is around 3,000,000 plus which makes it near enough 5%. EVERYTHING here is geared to the muslims : halal slaughter, schools, education you name it. Our dhimmi Prime Minister just doesn’t get it. And as for Home Secretary Theresa May, adequate non expletives are not available.
You may recall one Josephus, historian, who, when quoting Manetho , stated ” A people of ignoble origin from the east, whose coming was unforeseen, had the audacity to invade the country, which they mastered by main force without difficulty or even a battle “.
By country he meant Egypt and he was talking about the Amalekites but it equally applies to the muslims. Like the mad dogs of Winston Churchill’s quotation, they need to be put down before we are all infected.
Newsbug says
I wonder where the UK is on that scale? And what the world is going to do about it?
SuchindranathAiyerS says
This is so, so, very secular Indian! It shows how, obviously, the British rule continues through the machinations of WOG Ambedkar, WOG-MOG Nehru and WOG-MOG Indira Gandhi to have created a nightmarish miasma called the Indian Republic. (Note: WOG: Western oriented gentleman. adj. rhymes with dog. Pejorative description of this sort of pretentious scum by upper crust British Imperialists. MOG: Moslem oriented gentleman. My own coinage. Refers to the idols of secularists such as Khangresswallis of India). Remember the Spencer Road (Bangalore) Rapes of Ramzan 2014? A Mahamutton Gang led by a Dalit-Moslem Politician’s son. The Mahamutton Police Officers refused to register an FIR. The “Tipu Sultan Float” Karnataka Khangress Chief Minister and Home Minister tried to cover it up. It emerged that the Dalit-Moslem’s son had videos of several rapes. And then to distract attention of the media and the public, there were a series of rapes of infant girls in schools by Moslem subordinate staff. Welcome to British India – 2015.
Melissa Martin says
I know many nations think that the U.S. Citizens are gun toting deranged lunatics, but in reality, we are not. I am a female that has a gun license and I carry a gun when I go out of town for work or even around town just in case I get attacked. Most Americans haven’t even shot their guns at anyone. Of course we have some nut jobs once in a while, but the majority of people here are just wanting to defend themselves. But if you are having to defend yourself and your involved in a hand to hand combat because you are not allowed to carry a weapon, I suggest to hit them as hard as you can in the throat! Every single person that gets hit in the throat is stunned and stops what they are doing because they are panicking because they can’t breathe. This will give the victim time to either get away or continue to beat them. Also always be aware of your surroundings! You never know what is lurking around the corner. I, myself, avoid any place that is essentially dangerous (dark alleys, low lighted areas, bad neighborhoods, etc). I use to teach self defense and that is always what I would tell my students. Also to make the bad person believe you want them (if they are trying to rape you) and let them get into a vulnerable position and then proceed to hit them in the throat. Psychologically, they love the “fight” and may not be turned on any more if you submit at first or they think you are going to let them do whatever and when they get their pants around their ankles, fight for your life. This will trip them up and they are easier to get away from. Of course this is just my two cents!! I hope this advice helps someone someday!!
DAvid says
Where did all the men go? They are coming for our woman and children and we are suppose to give them up? The pedophiles running Britain are hopefully sowing the seeds of their own destruction. At some point you will fight back.
Jason says
The only thing in England less manly than the women are the politicians.
Ronald Parsons says
Via news reports I know about the Muslim rape gang problems in the UK. For many years I was an Anglophile and frequent visitor to England. I took a snippet of my higher education there. But no longer. I haven’t visited since 1999 and shall not visit again. I believe UK policies towards self-defense, and Muslim crime and immigration to be wrong in the extreme. And I am afraid that the ever-increasing mind-numbness of OUR electorate will cause US policies to veer towards those of the UK. But for the present in my State of Virginia guns and ammo are easily and legally obtainable. Here licenses to carry concealed handguns are relatively easy to obtain. I have such a license.
I am able to buy and keep in the home as many semi-automatic firearms as I choose. Like a huge number of my fellow citizens I legally own and keep shotguns, rifles and handguns. If my dwelling is broken into in the nighttime or if I an octogenarian, am under attack in the street, I shall be in mortal fear for my life and will shoot to kill my attacker/housebreaker. I am unlikely to be indicted, but if indicted I am unlikely to be convicted of mayhem, murder or manslaughter. But such rights are surely being whittled away.
I am politically oriented towards individual rights. Our Executive branch of Gov ‘t. is not. I expect this essay to be taken note of at Fort Meade which is the USA’s Cheltenham. But there will be no action. However, were I to order a pressure cooker, new or used, via the internet, federally inspired local law enforcement authorities likely would come crashing through the doors in a little while. More than one “trigger” word appears in this note of comment. I leave it to the reader to decide whether or not such Gov’t. snooping and action are good or bad.
jo says
If this is your opinion, it does not prove what you are writing to be the truth ….In fact it would make it just another…… opinion. Pick on someone else for your racist iIslamophobic BS
Western Canadian says
And who are you commenting to??
Bindon Blood says
There seems to be some confusion here regarding carrying an offensive weapon in England. The position described is not a new ruling but a very old one. People were never allowed to carry offensive weapons in public although the common law did allow the carrying of weapons purely for defence. The Offensive weapons act of 1953 was brought in to cover a spate of violence linked to the then youth fad of “Teddy Boys”. These people dressed in a modified type of Edwardian dress,namely long “drape” jackets with velvet collars,”drain pipe” trousers,crepe soled shoes,bright socks.and “slim Jim” ties. They formed a particular type of modern (then) delinquent and would gather in groups of like minded youths. It was also the custom for these gangs to carry bicycle chains,often sharpened and with looped handles attached,cut throat razors,snooker balls in socks and other innocuous objects that could however be used to inflict injury in the frequent fights in which these gangs involved themselves.
It therefore became necessary for the law to define an offensive weapon;it was defined as following. An offensive weapon per se,ie made for an offensive purpose,bayonet,truncheon,knuckle-duster etc, adapted for use as an offensive weapon,ie,adapted bicycle chain,sharpened metal comb, etc. The third category was anything that was intended to be used as an offensive weapon,cut throat razor,razor blades,cricket bat etc. The first two categories were almost absolute offences,very easy for the police to prove. The third category was not. The police had to prove that an innocent object was carried purely for an offensive purpose, and the defence was reasonable excuse for having the object on you.Lawful authority applied only to offensive weapons per se. Therefore if a woman had a metal ended comb in her bag as many did in those days for preening the complex and lacquered hair styles of the time,this was an innocent object and the mere fact that she might have used it to ward off an attacker would not constitute the offence because she did not possess the comb for an offensive purpose and it had not been adapted by ,say,sharpening, but
merely to comb her hair.There was no danger of her being prosecuted for an assault or offensive weapon as under common law a citizen is able to defend himself and use whatever force is necessary.
Mace spray etc. is made for an offensive purpose even though the idea is to use it in self defence. In practice no woman would be charged for an offensive weapon if she was defending herself from serious harm;no court would convict or be allowed to convict by a judge.
Also under common law and statute law any one can arrest any one committing an offence and use as much force as is necessary in the circumstances .To resist a lawful detainer is an offence. So the law is a bit complicated but is not new and not really as Robert portrays it.
gravenimage says
Bindon Blood wrote:
So the law is a bit complicated but is not new and not really as Robert portrays it.
…………………………
This is the police explicitly telling a potential rape victim that she may be allowed to use nothing to defend herself—that, in fact, she may not even be allowed to mark her attacker for future identification.
To pretend that this is nothing but unforeseen repercussions from necessary laws enacted sixty-five years ago to protect against juvenile delinquency is just entirely misleading.
Bindon Blood says
If a Constable is telling anyone that ,then he/she is wrong and does not know the law.As I say ,one is allowed in law to self defence by any means reasonable in the circumstances,including killing the attacker. But the truth is that people are not allowed in law to carry offensive weapons in public. That means,as I said,items that are made for the purpose of causing injury or adapted to cause injury and have no other purpose.Everyday items that are carried with the intent of causing injury are also offensive weapons ,but there must be a prior intent not just a spur of the moment decision in necessity. An older law,which is now repealed also covered a similar category,the Vagrancy act of 1824.This said it was an offence to have in ones possession any cutlass,hangar,or any other instrument to use as a weapon of offence. It is a very old concept but it does not negate self defence. I imagine that the U.S has similar statutes or common law as U.S law is based on English law.
torino390 says
You know, it’s getting to a point where I am no longer proud to be British. We must be the laughing stock across the world. There was a time when we were strong, and fought invasion of our country, but now we almost seem to welcome and encourage it. I honestly don’t know what to say. Talk to any group of people in any bar in any town or city, everyone will tell you the same. Everyone has the same concerns. And this isn’t about immigration generally, and it isn’t about race either. It’s about Islam. Why can’t the government see it? Why are we doing this to our lovely country? I really don’t understand why we are on this road to self-destruction. Am I missing something or what?
Ronald Parsons says
torino390 asks why the UK is on the road to self-destruction via soft-pedaling the serious problems rising out of Islam. I gather that many in the UK have asked the same question.
May I call your attention to a 2009 news story in “The Telegraph” by (then) Home Affairs Editor Tom Whitehead? Mr. Whitehead called attention to what I gather was a piece written in the “Evening Standard” by Andrew Neather, former adviser/speech writer for (then)-Labor-occupied Downing Street and Home Office. ‘The Telegraph” story’s heading was “Labor wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural . . . .” Mr. Neather is reported to have said that “as well as bringing in hundreds of thousands more migrants to plug labour market gaps, there was also a ‘driving political purpose’ behind immigration policy.” Neather is reported to have continued his comments with ‘But ministers wouldn’t talk about it. In part they probably realised the conservatism of their core voters:’
I remember the story from the time when it was published; and I was able to find a printout on the internet today. My recollection from 2009 is that later there was a retraction by Mr. Neather. But ever since then I have believed that Neather had it right the first time and that he was “encouraged” to adjust his story.
Not only have I spent considerable time in the UK — When back in the US I subscribed to the Oxford newspaper, to The Financial Times, and to “The Economist” for years. Being from the US working class myself I had and spoke with friends who constituted representatives from England’s “man in the street.” And I am no stranger to some of the British Isle’s pubs.
As a result of all I was familiar with the common sentiment towards outsiders at that time. I would hardly have called it “welcoming.” But apparently you Brits’ ministers felt strongly that what I though to be a grand country with a grand population at the time, needed to be led away from old, conservative John Bull. Too bad. But I detect a similar practice by our esteemed leaders in Washington — and I don’t like it.
Ronald Parsons, Juris Doctoris.
Michael Warden says
The Neather story is true. The Blair government actually put out leaflets in Pakistan of all places offering houses and jobs for anyone. Hanging offence, I would have thought. Oh how I would love to hang that Blair creature.
Bindon Blood says
I should have explained that under the law an offensive weapon per se is anything that is manufactured explicitly to cause harm to another and has no other purpose in it’s use. Therefore mace spray,whatever the circumstances surrounding it’s use,is made purely to cause harm to another.
RJ says
Is this really part of the UN rules that they want to push around the world? To treat the nationals of a country like they are not as good as Muslims? What is there fear? Kind of like Obama says that the US isn’t a Christian nation anymore yet Christians are still 70% of the population. I think that just shows the bunk that Obama and the UK politicians are trying to spread to keep the native population cowed and under control.
I’m sure the rapists will soon be attacking young males enough to where the numbers will be harder to hide like the female rapes. Maybe then the UK will get some balls and fire back and demand some action.
gravenimage says
UK police tell women not to harm their attackers, get a rape alarm
………………………………..
Heaven forfend a rapist might be harmed!
And what if anyone responding to the rape alarm might harm the rapist? Why, even the police might harm the rapist. Too great a chance to take, I say…sarc/off
More:
The latest dispatch from the United Kingdom’s ongoing campaign to eliminate all forms of armed self-defense seems too incredible to be true.
………………………………..
I’m not sure any of this is too incredible to be true at this point. I know that Britons are not even allowed to protect themselves in their own homes now.
More:
The question at issue asks, “Are there any legal self defence products that I can buy?” Succinctly epitomizing the sad state of natural rights in Great Britain, the first sentence states, “The only fully legal self defence product at the moment is a rape alarm.”
………………………………..
We’re not even talking handguns here—the police disapprove of such things as mace and pepper spray and even marking one’s attacker for identification.
More:
So even in the sanctity of one’s home, the statement seems to suggest that care for violent offenders outweighs the rights of potential victims to be safe and secure against attack.
…the UK government appears intent on wiping out any remaining vestiges of the traditional right to self-defense.
………………………………..
Yes—care for violent attackers, but possible prosecution for their victims, even over the most mild defense.
How can criminals in general and ravening Muslims in particular not be greatly emboldened by this supine insanity?
Bindon Blood says
Defence within the home or private property is misunderstood and ignorant police Constables haven’t helped. The law remains unchanged for centuries ant it is that a person has the right in law to protect his wife, family, property,and a servant his master( it is an old law) against any attack or harm to whatever extent is necessary in the circumstances,even including death.What the law does not allow is individual punishment.For example if one beats an intruder who is attacking any of the above that is lawful but if the attacker gives in ,or runs away the law allows pursuit but not further beating etc. unless the intruder attacks again. If he gives in one is not allowed to beat or injure as a form of punishment or use extreme violence where extreme violence is not needed. If extreme violence s needed then so be it. If the intruder resists arrest he can be subdued by any means necessary in the circumstances until he submits. A simple trespasser,ie someone who might get into an out house to sleep should be ordered to leave,if he refuses he can be ejected using whatever force is necessary,in the circumstances.He can be arrested for a breach of the peace and handed to a Constable. These are ancient laws not modern day laws. Perhaps they are out of date in these different times.
gravenimage says
I agree that excessive force should not be used—as, for instance, that a burglar fleeing or is otherwise no longer a threat should not be beaten or shot.
But the current interpretation of British law prevents a homeowner or shopkeeper from defending his property, and prevents shop assistants or customers from even coming to the aid of a shopkeeper.
This is *not* how British law was interpreted for many centuries.
And many Britons *have* been prosecuted for defending themselves.
Laws were supposed to toughened to provide more protection for the victims of crime acting in self defense a couple of years ago, but this has proven to be pretty toothless:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2315808/You-bash-burglar-Governments-tough-rhetoric-branded-farce-revealed-homeowners-barred-fighting-raiders-garden-chasing-outside.html
From the tone of the comments section, it looks as though many Britons are concerned about the erosion of their ability to defend themselves in today’s Britain.
Bindon Blood says
What you say might be the common view of the law but it is not correct. The law is quite clear on this;it is lawful to defend oneself,family,property etc. to whatever extent is necessary in the circumstances. no one will be prosecuted if this is the case.There might be an investigation,there would be an investigation if the attacker was killed or seriously injured ,but prosecution would not follow if the above circumstances applied. The police in recent times haven’t helped in the understanding of the law as many seem to be ignorant of it themselves. But the case is as I have said and has been so for centuries. The only thing that has changed over the years is the law relating to fire arms and knives. No loaded section 1 firearm is allowed to be carried in public,or unloaded together with ammunition for it. No loaded shotgun is allowed in public including a cartridge in the breech. The public have a right to own a shotgun and the police have to give reason why ownership should be denied. This is no automatic right to own a section one firearm and a potential owner must show good reason to own one. This is different to the situation that existed say 100 years ago
A bladed object with a blade over 3 inches long must not be carried without reasonable excuse or authority,flick knives,and other knives of a similar type are offensive weapons per se. The real problem in England is not the laws but the lefty judges and P.C police who are far too lenient with criminals.Judges are loath to lock up criminals. This is the problem because in days past we had the same laws but proper judges and police and criminals didn’t get away with anything.
gravenimage says
I decided to check out http://www.askthe.police.uk. On the home page it has sections on speeding, tax, animals and alcohol—not a *single* section on violent crime at all.
Under “R”, the first entry is “racial incident”. It has other entries such as “register your car”, “railways and public transit”, and “road traffic”. The *only* reference to violent crime—at the very bottom—is “robbery”. There is no entry for rape at all.
Likewise, there is no entry for “murder” under “M” or “homicide” under “H”. There is an entry for “hare coursing”, though…
Angemon says
gravenimage posted:
“There is no entry for rape at all.”
There’s an entry for “sexual offences”. It mentions rape in “I have been raped but I am too scared to come forward, what is the procedure and will the police take the report seriously?”, for which the answer starts with “Police take all reports of sexual attacks seriously regardless of the perceived gravity of the offence” – we all know how that worked out for girls being raped by muslims.
Frank says
Idiot Brits.
Linda Rivera says
The wicked government has no desire for women and girls to be protected from rape. The government only care about and want to protect dirty demonic inhuman, savage, sex slaver Muslim monsters — the
Spawn of Satan.
Jeff Jones says
Europeans want to self terminate. They want to be bred out of existence. They are telling whites to let their Arab attackers rape and impregnate them and give birth to a baby jihadist. It’s all a remnant from WWII. The whites have become so politically correct due to Hitler, that they want to breed themselves out of existence, just to spite Hitler. Europeans are obsessed with race and white guilt. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face. It’s total mental illness that has become the law and now “normal” in Europe. The Arabs know Europe is ripe for conquest due to their weakness brought on by political correctness.
bernie says
I’m normally opposed to abortion, but in such cases (Islamofascist rapists impregnating their victims) then it’s perfectly justified…in any case of rape, in fact.
Green Infidel says
Such “advice” from the police in Britain is hardly new. Back in my school days in London, I remember a policeman came to give a talk to our class. As my parents had a big dog, I asked him a question – what if a dog bites a burglar? His answer was, that if this is deemed likely, the dog should wear a muzzle – even at home!!
And, sure enough, one news story of the day was of the owners of a dog being punished for leaving their dog in the car, who ended up biting a thief who had broken in…
Could such concern for the well-being of thieves be one reason why burglary is endemic in some parts of the country?
David says
Folks, I resisted believing this for years, not wanting to succumb to the conspiracy theory craze that’s so widespread these days, but I believe it’s a fact that there is a cabal of world government enthusiasts who have the money and power to institute world government. To accomplish that, they must bring as many as possible into a common belief system. The standard Judeo-Christian beliefs do not accord at all with their purposes, so they must alter as many peoples’ perceptions of right/wrong and good/evil as they can. The rest will be dealt with later. After all, reducing world population is one of their prized goals. So, news and “social” media as well as other methods will be used to shape the public perceptions until they fit what is needed to allow an orderly transition from our current beliefs and behaviors to those that are allowed and approved by the overlords of the New World Order. So far, their plans are working splendidly.
Truth Seeker says
This Shows in British Ruling Machinery, lot of Islamic Trojan Horses are already Infiltrated. Unfortunately People Elect the Government that abets Islamic Crimes and Cruelties. Digging Own Grave for Britishers.
Mary Sue says
Good grief where are the Rape Crisis Feminists when you need them? The brit police are rape apologists kowtowing to rape culture! A rape whistle? REALLY? That’ll be about as ignored as a car alarm in downtown Harlem in 1989.