The Grimhøj mosque is famous for sending more jihadis to the Islamic State than any other Danish mosque. The US’ Federal Register on Abu Hamza: “Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Abdessamad Fateh, also known as Abu Hamza, committed or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.”
Related:
• Denmark: Police attacked at funeral of Islamic State fighter
• Denmark: Muslim youths screaming “Allahu akbar” say they’re “brothers” to jihad murderer
• Denmark: Muslims show Islamic State finger sign at burial of terrorist
Translated from JP:
Abu Hamza, a Muslim and known as a central figure around the disputed Grimhøj mosque in Aarhus, has died of cancer, 46 years old. On Monday afternoon around 1,000 people attended his funeral procession from the mosque through Aarhus to the Muslim burial ground in the Western Cemetery.
As previously disclosed, sources has confirmed that Abu Hamza in 2008 was involved in the so-called Tunisian case where he – together with two Tunisians – was arrested for comprehensive plans to kill Jyllands-Posten’s former cartoonist Kurt Westergaard in revenge for Muhammad cartoons.
Westman says
Something rotten will soon be rotting in Denmark.
Kathy Brown, Esq. says
Hahahaha! What wonderful dexterity with language Westman-not to mention the stark truth of it.
Anytime I read of the death of one of these monsters I find myself thinking, ‘Thank you Lord! He/she was a blot upon the earth’…
Now: I was worried that such thinking was sinful so I sought the Church’s take on this. Father told me, ‘It is not sinful to be glad/relieved of the death of one who did evil-but one must pray that such will convert in the split second before their death’.
umbra says
A tumour taken by other tumours.
BillWalker says
Can’t Denmark get rid of the jihad clerics ? They should be first on the things to do.
Lia Wissing says
At this funeral, the photographs and names of attendees should have been taken and then they should be expelled.
Joseph says
I hope they were taking volumes of pictures and I also hope that they will use face recognition software. They were being given a “gift” by these idiots going to a terrorists funeral. Lets pray that they did not let this opportunity slip by.
YES!!! Criminals/terrorists ARE that stupid to show up like this. I have examples of criminals showing up at a televised police Roll call held in the street.
Gbox says
But they know that the authorities are bound by even more stupid liberal laws protecting these terrorists from scrutiny. So they have nothing to fear by showing up at this funeral.
Angemon says
Hmmm, I wonder if they have that info on the tourist brochures?…
Although that’s 47 years too late, couldn’t have happened to a nicer person. I guess there’s not enough camel piss in Denmark?
On Monday afternoon around 1,000 people attended his funeral procession from the mosque through Aarhus to the Muslim burial ground in the Western Cemetery.
But unlike non-muslim funerals where muslims impose their presence, they didn’t insult the corpse, his religion and everyone else.
dumbledoresarmy says
HE’S DEAD!!
One less jihad gang boss for Danish Homeland Security to worry about. Scratch his name off the “Watch” list….
And seconding the comment by “Joseph”, above, who said – “I hope they [I assume that Joseph means Danish police and Intelligence service – dda] and were taking volumes of pictures and I also hope that they will use face recognition software. They were being given a “gift” by these idiots going to a terrorists funeral. Lets pray that they did not let this opportunity slip by.”
Good one. I hope they *have* taken lots of pictures and are now checking them against databases and sharing them with other Infidel agencies to be cross-checked some more.
Gbox says
But they will not, because the authorities would consider that profiling.
More Ham Ed says
Not a tiny minority. Anyone who spends 15 minutes online can find objective research and polls that indicate upwards of 500 million to 600 million muslims worldwide are either radical or radical-ready (ko ‘ran ready). I know that at least 400 million muslims worldwide believe in the death penalty for leaving islam. I’ve posted that data along with references a bunch of times for JW visitors.
abad says
“The Grimhøj mosque is famous for sending more jihadis to the Islamic State than any other Danish mosque.”
Are they expecting a Nobel prize for that little achievement?
mortimer says
The funeral party is no doubt the WHO’S WHO of jihad in Denmark. If only the lot of them could be expelled from the country!
Baucent says
Dead at 46 from cancer. It must be the will of Allah.
wjsonl says
The media, politicians, even those most familiar with Islam and with Muslims, continue to identify people who attack others in the name of Islam as “terrorists”, or “savages”, or some such word implying a wild, out-of-control, psychotic (radicalized), person. But what those people should be called is simply “Islamic militants”. They are soldiers of Islam, doing what they’re instructed to do by the warlord they call a prophet, and following the dictates of the Koran. When a country or an ideology is at war, every person in that country or believer in that ideology does not pick up a weapon and fight. Only the military, or the militants, do so. If we refer to the people who carry out suicide bombings, men who attack bases such as Ft. Hood, and those who attack innocent people attending events such as the Garland contest and the Boston marathon, if we refer to them simply as “Islamic militants”, then it makes no difference whether or not it can be shown that they are tied to Al Qaeda, ISIS, or Hezbollah, etc. They are all tied together by their ideology, Islam. Using the term “Islamic militants” clearly identifies them as soldiers of Islam, which is exactly what they are. We are at war with Islam, not with any particular brigade or division of their worldwide army.
wjsonl says
The media, politicians, even those most familiar with Islam and with Muslims, continue to identify people who attack others in the name of Islam as “terrorists”, or “savages”, or some such word implying a wild, out-of-control, psychotic (radicalized), person. But what those people should be called is simply “Islamic militants”. They are soldiers of Islam, doing what they’re instructed to do by the warlord they call a prophet, and following the dictates of the Koran. When a country or an ideology is at war, every person in that country or believer in that ideology does not pick up a weapon and fight. Only the military, the militants, do so. If we refer to the people who carry out suicide bombings, men who attack bases such as Ft. Hood, and those who attack innocent people attending events such as the Garland contest and the Boston marathon, if we refer to them simply as “Islamic militants”, then it makes no difference whether or not it can be shown that they are tied to Al Qaeda, ISIS, or Hezbollah, etc. They are all tied together by their ideology, Islam. Using the term “Islamic militants” clearly identifies them as soldiers of Islam, which is exactly what they are. We are at war with ISLAM, not with any particular brigade or division of their worldwide army.
duh_swami says
Only a thousand? That’s it? If it was a protest against cartoons it would get more Mahoundians than that.
ICH says
Did he object to the “western” cancer medication and die a HERO ?
That priest had it right , the world has lost its conscience.
I bet if average people decided to make a stink and arm themselves
they would be treated worse by their own governments
than known terrorists would.
Its like we treat them like ROCK STARS !!!