“U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom told the Pakistani-born men they had taken advantage of the benefits of U.S. citizenship to plot violence and hatred against their fellow-Americans.” There is no doubt whatsoever that the Qazi brothers did not think of themselves as Americans, and did not believe that they were plotting against their fellow Americans, but only against the dirty kuffar.
“Broward brothers get stiff sentences for NYC terrorist bomb plot,” by Paula McMahon, Sun Sentinel, June 11, 2015:
Two Broward County brothers were sentenced to the maximum punishment Thursday after admitting they planned a terrorist attack on New York City landmarks and later assaulted two deputy U.S. marshals in custody.
Raees Alam Qazi, 22, who played the lead role in the conspiracy and cycled around Manhattan looking for bomb targets was sentenced to 35 years in federal prison. That is three years more than he expected under the terms of his plea agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
His brother, Sheheryar Alam Qazi, 32, who provided support, was sentenced to a 20-year prison term, also three years more than expected.
U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom told the Pakistani-born men they had taken advantage of the benefits of U.S. citizenship to plot violence and hatred against their fellow-Americans.
“You are a terrorist, evil in nature and evil in your deeds,” Bloom told Raees Qazi in court.
The judge also chastised Sheheryar Qazi for supporting “your brother’s devotion to al-Qaida.”
The men’s involvement in the terrorist conspiracy was “evil and reprehensible,” she told them.
Dressed in beige prison scrubs and handcuffed and shackled, both men were quiet and polite in court but declined the judge’s invitation to speak before they were sentenced….
wildjew says
Muslim American who plot murder against innocent American should be executed; at minimum deported back to Pakistan, Somalia; Saudi Arabia.
Brian says
The BIG problem as is seen in Europe is that those BORN in European counties, ie second generation Muslims are even worse and cannot be deported even if they commit heinous crimes.
wildjew says
I think these were Pakistani born Muslims. Nevertheless, Muslim terrorists who plot to murder innocents should be executed.
Angemon says
Not all countries have capital punishment or imprisonment for life.
Lee says
“The BIG problem as is seen in Europe is that those BORN in European counties…cannot be deported even if they commit heinous crimes.”
Hi. Here in Australia the government is proposing to strip citizenship from Muslim terrorists or terrorist-supporters who were born here, if they can access foreign citizenship through their parents or grandparents.
Muslim groups and their collaborators are of course shaking in fear, because they know the game is nearly up. Australia could become nearly Muslim-free within a few years – something for other civilized countries to consider.
particolor says
Well I think they could be rehabilitated ! The would have no trouble getting a part as Owlhoots in a Spaghetti Western by the looks of them !! đ
voegelinian says
What about all the other Muslim Americans who may be plotting but who appear to be blending in and about whom we have no evidence they are anything but Muslims Who Just Wanna Have a Sandwich? Should we wait until any number of them manage to pull off another attack that could be as bad, if not worse than 911 — or even several attacks in various places throughout the U.S.?
I agree with execution of those caught red-handed. But I go further to advocate deportation of all Muslims not caught red-handed (about whom we reasonably suppose a collusion with jihad). It should not be our obligation to go through the meticulously elaborate and costly forensic process of figuring out which Muslim is harmless and which is dangerous; nor should we wait around on the premise that any Muslim who has not yet exploded is ipso facto to be given the benefit of the doubt. My definition of the “Counter-Jihad Softy” is anyone in the Counter-Jihad who balks at what I just described.
The Counterjihad Softball Team
http://hesperado.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-counterjihad-softball-team.html
The Counter-Jihad Softies: 10 Flavors of the Anti-Islam Soft Serve
http://hesperado.blogspot.com/2009/06/anti-jihad-softies-different-flavors-of.html
Angemon says
voegelinian posted:
“I go further to advocate deportation of all Muslims not caught red-handed (about whom we reasonably suppose a collusion with jihad).”
Hi voeg.
Where would you suggest we’d “deport” a muslim who has no other citizenship? Suppose a native american convert to islam who can trace hie lineage back to the pre-Columbian era.
I know I’ve asked you this several times before and got no answer (I don’t count irrelevant tangents and puerile insults as answers), hence I’m not expecting to get one here but hey, a man can dream, can’t he? đ
miriamrove says
Those bastards have no loyalty to America whatsoever. Their loyalty is to their GD pedophile prophet. m
Papa Whiskey says
U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom told the Pakistani-born men they had taken advantage of the benefits of U.S. citizenship to plot violence and hatred against their fellow-Americans.
Regardless of their citizenship status, these creatures are emphatically not our “fellow Americans.” This was made abundantly clear by Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, then secretary general of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, in a speech at Columbia University on Sept. 18, 2008:
The Muslim Ummah, means the âcommunity of the faithfulâ. It is a unique bond that has no similar example under any other political or religious system in the world. It is a belonging to ideals which bring Muslims together in an eternal brotherhood lock which transcends all other consideration of allegiance or loyalties or barriers of nationhood, ethnicity, geography or language.
Accordingly, let us have done with talk of âMuslim Americansâ and âAmerican Muslims.â “American” and “Muslim” are two separate entities, and a combination of them is no more possible than a cross-breed between a human being and an orangutan.
Michael Copeland says
âThe Muslim nation is one nation to the exclusion of all othersââ
Placard in pro-Sharia march Oxford Street, London, video at 0.31
http://thinkafricapress.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rq4el7gyPas
Stardusty Psyche says
“brothers were sentenced to the maximum punishment”
âYou are a terrorist, evil in nature and evil in your deeds,â
“chastised Sheheryar Qazi for supporting âyour brotherâs devotion to al-Qaida.â”
âevil and reprehensible,â
Those damn liberal Obama appointees, just goes to show Pamela Geller is correct that “Obama is unequivocally aligned with the jihad force.” I mean, just look at the mollycoddling women he puts on the bench!
Ayatrollah says
I did not see where Obama was mentioned in this.
Stardusty Psyche says
Hi Ayatrollah,
Good point, Obama is never mentioned on JW when he, or his appointees, or the people he commands kills, thwarts, apprehends, or punishes jihadis.
Of course, this happens every day around the clock. Nary a peep about it on JW.
I’m just doing my part to make JW “fair and balanced” đ
EventHorizon says
Hey Space Cadet,
You obviously have not idea what you’re talking about. Obama has been major topic here.
Not surprised at your foolish comment considering you conflate the Bible and Koran. There is a reason that Muslims kill and rape for their beliefs and Christians(or Jews) don’t. But you’d have to actually read those books to know that.
It’s half-wits like you that play right into the hands of the Muslims. You may want to do some homework before you try to ‘do your part’. You’re just a counterproductive embarrassment.
Stardusty Psyche says
Hi EventHorizon,
I realize things are a bit distorted in your precarious location, so I will help you out a bit…
SP-“Obama is never mentioned on JW when he, or his appointees, or the people he commands kills, thwarts, apprehends, or punishes jihadis.”
EH-“Obama has been major topic here.”
I know it is difficult to read while you are being sucked into oblivion, but do try a little more, OK?
Obama is a subject here when he is being labeled as a stealth jihadi, terrorist in the White House, closet Muslim, and all the other preposterous statements made by all the Pamela Geller sycophants here.
Obama is never mentioned by them when he does just the opposite, kill jihadis, apprehend jihadis, thwart jihadis…which he commands every day of every week, month, and year 24/7.
“you conflate the Bible and Koran”
Read the stories of Moses and Joshua. You will find genocide and sexual enslavement even worse than Muhammad. The Jews did it 3400 years ago, Muhammad 1400 years ago. The Jews gave up on the genocide and sexual slavery aspects to concentrate on stealing land at minimum cost in lives. The Muhammadans are out to spread their disgusting doctrine globally. Try to keep it straight, OK?
“Youâre just a counterproductive embarrassment.”
I am ever so sorry to have caused you such distress.
EventHorizon says
What part of ‘commander-in-chief’ don’t you understand? JW has detailed many accounts of the US military successfully killing, thwarting, apprehending and punishing Jihadis.
I have read the books of Moses and Joshua. If you can’t tell the Bible from the Koran, you need help. First you should probably admit that you’ve never read either one. Because if you have you’ll have to join Reza Aslan in claiming that words have no meaning. In fact, Reza would agree with your opinion that the Bible is ‘worse’ than the Koran. It’s a common Islamic ploy that exploits the ignorance of people like you to be effective. And effective it is.
The violence in the Old Testament is descriptive, not prescriptive. Jews have never gone around killing tribes just because it’s part of their history. The same way you wouldn’t decide to start killing after reading about your history. They were never commanded to do so. Muslims go around killing because they are commanded to do so until they rule the world. Is that too complicated?
Stardusty Psyche says
Hi EventHorizon,
“What part of âcommander-in-chiefâ donât you understand? JW has detailed many accounts of the US military successfully killing, thwarting, apprehending and punishing Jihadis. ”
Exactly. Obama is the leading person on the planet successfully killing, thwarting, apprehending and punishing Jihadis.
I get that. I have been telling that to the folks here again and again. The typical response is that I must be a Muslim troll, idiot, and a few more less kind attributions.
Tell it to the people here at JW who don’t get it, that would be about 90% of the posters here who are Pamela Geller sycophants, who keep claiming Obama is a stealth Jihadi while he leads the world against the jihadis.
Indeed, what part of “Commander in Chief” don’t the majority of JW folks get?
EventHorizon says
If Obama is a Muslim practicing stealth jihad he is doing a great job. If he’s trying to uphold the Constitution and combat a sworn enemy(Islam), he’s doing the worst job possible.
Of course the US continues to fight Muslims under Obama, no one can stop that. The question is how effectively is the US fighting them. He won’t even admit Islam is Islam. How much more can he do to cover for them? You may want to consult Stephen Coughlin for a few facts on the matter(though it seems facts just aren’t for you). You may want to consider that Obama supports the Muslim Brotherhood, glorifies Islam(Death Cult) and disrespects Christianity.
Obama is a traitor. Obama is a Muslim.
Stardusty Psyche says
Hi EventHorizon;
What specific documents, transcripts, and actions can you cite as hard evidence that
!. Obama supports the Muslim Brotherhood,
2. Obama glorifies Islam(Death Cult)
3. Obama disrespects Christianity.
4. Obama is a traitor.
5. Obama is a Muslim.
I think your accusations are fruitcake conspiracy theory website regurgitations,
Angemon says
And allah willing, they’ll get more stiff ones in prison. Assuming they shower with soap, that is.
I doubt they thought of Americans as being their “fellows”. No, they were just filthy infidels who needed to be put in their place.
Stardusty Psyche says
Hi Angemon
“And allah willing, theyâll get more stiff ones in prison.”
So, now you are promoting prison rape?
In another typically insightful JW post Angemon takes the term “penal system” just a bit too far…
Angemon says
Stardusty Psyche posted:
“So, now you are promoting prison rape?”
You have a mind so open you read things that aren’t there to begin with… Not the first time, and I doubt it will be the last.
Stardusty Psyche says
Angemon’s non-denial denial noted…
mortimer says
Western governments need to rethink the rules of citizenship. Those who plan and/or execute acts of terror against their adopted country should at least lose citizenship and benefits.
The problem is creating stateless people. It’s just not possible to send them back if they’ve abandoned their citizenship of birth.
A Devil’s Island, similar to Guantanamo is for better or for worse the best solution or the only one left for segregating terrorists forever.
wb says
islam is very powerful in florida as it has most major politicians and the governor, rick scott on the payroll. florida is a huge money making racket for the terrorist as they have their hands in all sorts of illegal activity. if and when the terrorists decide to target America directly florida, like michigan, will be a key battleground. the mosques here all preach hate and plot murder but they can’t be touched as local FBI offices run interference for them.
ich says
I have not heard much about Dearborn,
But Michigan is not full of wimps, I know that .
I would hope the militias keep an eye on this problem.
UNLESS they have grown soft too.
I hope not !
Please stay vigilant ! đ
ICH says
its amazing to me that I learn facts on this website I havent even heard anywhere else !!
How are the politicians on our side when they mask the truth !?
They are feeding us to the wolves and could care less.
I saw same thing in UK.
The cities became more and more segregated and dangerous,
Lioness says
Do not jail these ugly bastards, deport them!
Stardusty Psyche says
Hi Lioness,
I’m feelin ya but it seems like when we let a detainee go we wind up facing him on the battlefield someplace shortly thereafter.
I say 2 sentences to be administered consecutively, maximum confinement followed by deportation.
Better yet, if at all possible, execution…the one sure preventive measure.
DVult says
The problem is that some or all of these guys will carry out terrorist attacks after they are let out of prison. The choice then is between permanent incarceration or execution.
Stardusty Psyche says
Joseph is another prison rape advocate!
I see Angemon is not the only one who take “penal system” just a bit too far.
Angemon says
Stardusty Psyche posted:
“I see Angemon is not the only one who take âpenal systemâ just a bit too far.”
I never promoted prison rape, and Joseph is not advocating prison rape, but Stardusty Psyche was never one to let facts get in the way of a good narrative…
Angemon says
Exactly where in there is the alleged “promotion” and “advocation” for prison rape you accused me and Joseph of, respectively? Nowhere, of course – like I said, you were never one to let facts get in the way of a good narrativeâŚ
Stardusty Psyche says
Angemon displays his typical density…
“get more stiff ones in prison” is a reference to getting fukced in the ass in prison.
“stiff thing they receive” is a reference to getting fukced in the ass in prison.
The jihadis are not going to accept voluntarily getting fukced in the ass in prison, making it rape, which both your and Joseph are obviously advocating.
The lack of an alternative meaning presented by you so far is a clear demonstration that both you and Joseph advocated the rape of the jihadis in prison
Angemon says
Stardusty Psyche posted:
“Angemon displays his typical density⌔
Puerile insults are not a replacement for reasonable logic, Stardusty Psyche, no matter how hard you wish on your Star.
“which both your and Joseph are obviously advocating.”
Where am I or Joseph allegedly “obviously advocating” for it? We’re not, obviously, and repeating a lie won’t make it true.
“The lack of an alternative meaning presented by you so far is a clear demonstration that both you and Joseph advocated the rape of the jihadis in prison”
Ah, another of your leaps in logic – since I and Joseph mentioned prison rape, therefore we’re advocating prison rape. I mentioned killing Jews in a recent post. Do you want me to link you to it so you can go there and accuse me of promoting the killing of Jews as well?
Angemon says
Stardusty Psyche posted:
“The jihadis are not going to accept voluntarily getting fukced in the ass in prison, making it rape,”
Are you sure about that? Maybe they’ll voluntarily prepare themselves to do another attack once they’re out:
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3158/islam-sodomy
Stardusty Psyche says
Joseph’s non-denial denial noted…
Joseph says
@ Stardusty Psyche
Listen you little turd. I NEVER said that he should be raped.
From now on if I do not reply to your posts that is because I am sick of talking to a rock. I take that back, I can’t call you a rock because rocks are useful. You just take up space.
You defend Ol’slimobama by using certain definitions for words that he used. Not once but many times.
THEN you have the balls to put words in Angemon’s mouth and mine. You are the epitome of a worthless, stupid liberal.
You think you are smart but but you are not.
Tell me, when are you going to capitulate and become a Muslim, that is if you are not one already. In fact you have NOT given any proof that you aren’t a Muslim….so I say YOU ARE ONE!
Stardusty Psyche says
Hi Joseph,
I don’t typically bring it up because I don’t think my personal affiliations are relevant to the merits, but I have mentioned in the past that I am an atheist, so I don’t mind saying it again since you seem to be interested in my religious affiliation or lack thereof.
It;s also nice to know I am a little turd, that is a very valuable assessment of my rhetorical capacities.
Joseph says
@ Stardusty Psyche
Saying you are an atheist=taquia
This does not prove you are not a Muslim.
Go on slander your profit Mohammed (MHABTBCD may his anus be torn by camel dick).
Also say something derogatory about your precious Allah who is really Satan.
Stardusty Psyche says
Hi Joseph,
I cannot prove my opinions to you, nor can you prove your opinions to me.
I don’t slander Muhammad, neither does Robert Spencer. The truth is a far better vehicle to combat fundamentalist Islam.
I have never heard Robert Spencer utter an untrue thing about Muhammad as the texts represent him to have actually been.
I have frequently characterized Islamic doctrine as fascist, genocidal, homicidal, suicidal, homophobic, misogynist, and a number of other things I have very good evidence for, and I can demonstrate based on facts that these characterizations are true.
I will never slander Muhammad. Get somebody else to do your hack job.
As for Allah I think he is a figment of the human imagination, as I consider all gods to be, so I have no intention of swatting at ghosts, though I can say that the notion of eternal torture fits my personal sense of evil, but then, I would say the same about the Jesus hell.
Mirren10 says
‘stardusty psyche’s sensitive horror of jihadists getting raped in prison, is rather amusing.
He doesn’t seem to be aware that homosexual activity is rife in the Arab world, and in most mohammedan countries.
The bacha bazi boys in Afghanistan, the homosexuality openly displayed in Saudi Arabia, and various ME countries, also African muslim countries, are only a few examples of a general trend.
In fact, the only thing islam doesn’t like about homosexuality, is if it is an expression of love/affection, or simply a cheery one night stand, between two consenting adults. If, on the other hand, it is forced and violent, or involves the exploitation of young boys, and involves being the **penetrator**, rather than the *penatratee* it’s perfectly halal.
mohammedans have been told, in several ‘fatwas’, that sodomy, in order to stretch the anus so it can accommodate explosives in order to murder infidels, is also perfectly halal.
Prison rape is a feature of being in a male prison.
Forgive me if I don’t share ‘stardusty psyche’s’ tears over mohammedans being subject to it.
Stardusty Psyche says
Hi Mirren10,
At least that is an honest answer of acknowledgement.
The punishment for homosexual acts is death, clearly. That is why IS pushes homosexuals from a high place and stones them when they land.
That is why Iran hangs them.
Muhammad was explicit and unequivocal on this point. The man-boy love thing in Afghanistan and the examples you cite truly have nothing to do with Islam.
Muhammad clearly mandated death for homosexual acts.
Mirren10 says
Further idiocy from ‘stardusty psyche’.
”The punishment for homosexual acts is death, clearly. That is why IS pushes homosexuals from a high place and stones them when they land.
That is why Iran hangs them.”
As I said, punishment for homosexuality in islam is confined to consensual, loving relationships. Violent and vicious, exploitative homosexuality is perfectly halal.
”The man-boy love thing in Afghanistan and the examples you cite truly have nothing to do with Islam”
Uh-huh. So why does the koran describe, as one of the perks provided to the faithful, ‘pure, pearly boys, with buttocks like peaches’ ?
”Muhammad clearly mandated death for homosexual acts”
Only for those beneath, The ones on top are AOK.
Stardusty Psyche says
Hi Mirren10,
I kinda feel bad for you, gettin all snotty when you are so mistaken…must be kind of embarrassing for you…
http://sunnah.com/tirmidhi/17/40
That the Messenger of Allah () said: “Whomever you find doing the actions of the people of Lut then kill the one doing it, and the one it is done to.”
http://sunnah.com/urn/2015030
“Whoever you find doing as the people of Lot did (i.e. homosexuality), kill the one who does it and the one to whom it is done, and if you find anyone having sexual intercourse with animal, kill him and kill the animal.” Related by Ahmad and the four Imams with a trustworthy chain of narrators.
For more you can go to
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/026-homosexuality.htm
As far as heaven, well, that is not here on Earth, now is it?
And yes, there is homosexuality in every culture, but the texts of Islam call for death to both top and bottom.
Do try to study a little before you run your mouth with ad hominems, it will save you such embarrassments…
Mirren10 says
‘stardusty psyche’ is quite correct in stating that in the sunnah, homosexuality is condemned for both parties, and carries the death penalty.
”âŚmust be kind of embarrassing for you⌔
Not at all. I have no problem in acknowledging when I have been mistaken; why would I ?
He cites the religionofpeace site on homosexuality in islam; however, the article also mentions the following:
.
”When Mehmed conquered Constantinople in 1453, the Muslim general demanded the 14-year-old son of one of the city’s Christian leaders as his sexual concubine (the father and son chose death instead). Subsequent Ottoman administrators also engaged in homosexuality, often with the boys of conquered populations who could not afford to satisfy the jizya (poll tax on non-Muslims) in any other way than to relinquish their own children to the Religion of Peace.”
”Thus illustrates the moral confusion that Islam has with homosexuality. Small wonder that the Islamic Republic of Iran hangs gays but allows men to get a sex change (sometimes at public expense).”
”Islam goes beyond mere disapproval of homosexuality. Sharia teaches that homosexuality is a vile form of fornication, punishable by death. Beneath the surface, however, there are implied references to homosexual behavior in paradise, and it has been a part of historical Arab and Muslim culture.”
.
”Interestingly, the same rules don’t apply in paradise, where martyrs for the cause of Allah enjoy an orgy of virgins and “perpetual youth” Qur’an (56:17) (otherwise known as “boys” Qur’an (52:24)). Qur’an (76:19) bluntly states, “And immortal boys will circulate among them, when you see them you will count them as scattered pearls.” Technically, the mere presence of boys doesn’t necessarily mean sex, however it is strongly implied from the particular emphasis on the effeminacy, handsomeness and “freshness” of the boys. The female virgins of paradise are also compared to pearls (56:23).”
”Abu Dawud (4448) – “If a man who is not married is seized committing sodomy, he will be stoned to death.” (Note the implicit approval of sodomizing one’s wife).”
”Since the creation of the Islamic State in 2014, a number of homosexuals have been killed by being thrown from rooftops, others by stoning. Interestingly, **the caliph, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, issued a fatwa in 2015 permitting Mujahideen to “enjoy” young boys if women were not available**” ( my emphasis: Mirren).
.
(As a side note, in 2012, a cleric issues a fatwa endorsing sodomy as a means of widening the anus in order to pack it with enough explosives to kill bystanders in a suicide bombing. **As Sheikh Abu al-Dema al-Qasab put it, “Jihad comes first, for it is the pinnacle of Islam, and if the pinnacle of Islam can only be achieved through sodomy, then there is no wrong in it.**” ( my emphasis: Mirren)
Also see the ahadith quoted in my earlier post, where mohammed sucks on the tongues of little boys, and kisses their penises.
There are also numerous articles describing the homosexual rape of little boys, and young men at the hands of IS; also in Pakistan, sodomy of male children is rarely criminalised. Simply google ”homosexual rape in islam”, and many articles come up, showing the acceptance of homosexual rape in mohammedan countries, provided, as I said, it is not loving and consensual, but brutal and exploitative.
It would appear the sunnah is honoured more in the breach, than the observance.
.
Stardusty Psyche says
Hi Mirren10,
“Not at all. I have no problem in acknowledging when I have been mistaken; why would I ?”
Because most people find it embarrassing to characterize an argument as “Further idiocy from…” only to later acknowledge having made a mistake.
Apparently you don’t share those sensibilities.
Mirren10 says
‘stardusty psyche’;
”Because most people find it embarrassing to characterize an argument as âFurther idiocy fromâŚâ only to later acknowledge having made a mistake.
Apparently you donât share those sensibilities.”
Unfortunately, your ‘argument’ went no further than stating that in the sunnah, homosexuality, whether one is the penatrator, or the penatratee, is condemned in islam.
I acknowledged that fact.
You, however, have totally ignored my other points, rendering your ‘argument’ superficial at best, and in my estimation, also idiotic, since I have given numerous examples to show you that violent homosexuality in islam is considered perfectly halal, depending on circumstance.
1) that jihad is the “pinnacle” of Islamâfor it makes Islam supreme (based on a hadith, the formerly oral history of the life of Muhammad); and 2) that “necessity makes permissible the prohibited.” These axioms are not limited to modern day fatwas, but in fact, were crystallized centuries and ago agreed to by the ulema [Islam’s leading religious scholars]. The result is thatâbecause making Islam supreme through jihad is the greatest priorityâanything and everything that is otherwise banned becomes permissible. All that comes to matter is one’s intention, or niyya.
From here one may understand the many ostensible incongruities of Islamic history: lying is forbiddenâbut permissible to empower Islam; intentionally killing women and children is forbiddenâbut permissible when performed during holy war, or jihad; suicide is forbiddenâbut also permissible during jihad, only then called “martyrdom.”
Indeed, the Five Pillars of Islamâincluding prayer and fastingâmay be ignored during the jihad. So important is the duty of jihad that the Ottoman sultansâwho often spent half their lives on the battlefieldâwere not permitted to perform the obligatory pilgrimage to Mecca.
Mirren10 says
Further to ‘stardusty psyche’s’ accusations that Angemon and Joseph ‘advocated’ prison rape.
Another example of his very limited abilities. Neither Angemon, or Joseph, has **advocated** prison rape, they have merely pointed out, as I also did, that homosexual rape is endemic in male prisons.
Actually, no, it isn’t an example of his limited abilities, but a typical leftard/mohammedan tactic; to deliberately misrepresent what an opponent is saying, in order to smear them, because one has no counter argument.
For myself, I couldn’t give a tuppenny damn if these two pieces of sh*t get their arses reamed on a daily basis, since they plotted to murder thousands of American citizens.
‘stardusty psyche’ however, is a card carrying leftard, so naturally he will cry copious tears over the criminals, rather than their victims.
Mirren10 says
Hadith Lesson of the Month:
âAnd there shall wait on them [the Muslim men] young boys of their own, as fair as virgin pearls.â
Hadith Number 16245, Volume Title: âThe Sayings of the Syrians,â Chapter Title: âHadith of Muâawiya Ibn Abu Sufyanâ:
âI saw the prophet â pbuh â sucking on the tongue or the lips of Al-Hassan son of Ali, may the
prayers of Allah be upon him. For no tongue or lips that the prophet sucked on will be tormented (by hell fire)
He (the Prophet) lift up his (al Hassanâs) shirt and kissed his (little) penis..â
ŘąŮŮ ŘŁŮŮ ŘľŮ٠اŮŮŮ ŘšŮŮŮ Ů ŘłŮŮ Ůب٠زبŮب؊ اŮŘس٠أ٠اŮŘŘłŮŮ
He (the prophet) kissed the (little) penis of al Hassan or al Husein
عأŮŘŞ اŮŮب٠ؾŮ٠اŮŮŮ ŘšŮŮŮ Ů ŘłŮŮ Ůع؏ ٠ا بŮŮ Ů؎ذ٠اŮŘŘłŮŮ Ů Ůب٠زبŮبتŮ
He (the prophet) put Huseinâs legs apart and kissed his (little) penis
”The man-boy love thing in Afghanistan and the examples you cite truly have nothing to do with Islam”
Really.
Another Hadith. Majma al-Zawaâid, Ali ibn Abu Bakr al-Haythami, 299/9 Ů ŘŹŮ Řš اŮزŮا،د ŮŘšŮ٠ب٠أب٠بŮŘą اŮŮŮŘŤŮ Ů
عأŮŘŞ عسŮ٠اŮŮŮ ŘľŮ٠اŮŮŮ ŘšŮŮŮ Ů ŘłŮŮ Ůع؏ ٠ا بŮŮ Ů؎ذ٠اŮŘŘłŮŮ Ů Ůب٠زبŮبتŮ
ŘąŮا٠اŮءبعاŮŮ Ů ŘĽŘłŮاد٠ŘŘłŮ
translated into English: âI saw the Messenger of Allah pbuh putting Huseinâs legs apart and kissing his (little) penis.â
Related by Al-Tabarani and itâs authentication is fully validated by Islamic scholars.
There are many other examples, of mohammed sucking little boys tongues, etc, if one cares to research them. Which you are obviously not inclined to do; you’d rather make stupid dogmatic statements in order to further your apologia of islam.
Before you open your stupid mouth, whilst contemptuously deriding people who post here, remember that the majority of posters here have a working knowledge of not only the koran, but the ahadith, and sira. A knowledge you yourself could gain, if you troubled to do some research, rather than stroke your own ego, and puff off your very limited knowledge.