What could possibly have gone wrong? “Chattanooga shooter worked at Perry Nuclear Power Plant; Medra Marketing,” WKYC, July 17, 2015 (thanks to Jerk Chicken):
CHATTANOOGA, Tenn. — The man who opened fire at two military facilities in Chattanooga, killing four Marines and injuring three others, is Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez.
WKYC has confirmed that he worked and lived for a time in Northeast Ohio.
FirstEnergy confirmed to WKYC’s Investigator Tom Meyer that he also worked at Perry Nuclear Power Plant from May 20 to May 30 of 2013.
FirstEnergy said he left because he didn’t meet the minimum requirements to remain employed. He worked as a electrical engineer right outside the nuclear reactor, which they say he did not have access.
Ashley Castillo, a manager at Medra, a marketing company in Independence, said he did work for the company….

karl Anglin says
Obama wishes all Muslims a happy end to Ramadan.
Shows where his priorities are!
particolor says
Happy end to Ramyadan in Bagdad !! đ đ
Victor Redlick says
So, latest delirious and kinda home-grown vermin, Mohammed Youssef HOMER Abdulazziz SIMPSON, worked at the PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, over in Chattanooga, eh? There are so many things wrong with this picture all leading to and emanating from Barack Obama but including anyone else who likewise uses euphemisms as opposed to the hard core name “Muslim terrorists, Islamic terrorists”; to describe the sadistic creeps responsible for the mayhem. Matt Groening would have a riot with this ” truth is stranger than fiction ” scenario, were it not for the murder of the four unarmed, innocent marines.
The Europization of America needs to have a sudden heart attack.
Saleem Smith says
Muhammad the Chattanooga jihad murderer was a devout Muslim and an obedient “Slave of Allah” when he killing those U.S. Marines yesterday. He most likely wanted Islamic Sharia law to become the law of the land in the U.S. as well.
In Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez’s mind, the Qur’an and Moe’s Sunnah are both true and perfect, so of course Islamic law should become the law of the land in the U.S. and elsewhere.
Muhammad the Chattanooga jihadi was hoping to claim his reward of the promised 72 virgins of Islamic paradise with his killing spree. But Islamic paradise is filled with only toothless old hags these days and Mohammed is a lonely and disappointed young man tonight who killed for nothing but a lie.
We ex-Muslims living with Islam’s formal and informal death penalty for apostasy know that Islam is a complete fraud and that Muhammad the prophet of Islam was an evil madman who probably never even existed.
Islam is no âreligion of peace.â Islam is primarily a religion of âinjustice, intolerance, hatred, and violence.â The fact is, if we non-Muslims were to say about Muslims what the Qur’an says about us, we would be arrested for hate speech. The Qur’an largely preaches discrimination, death, and imposition of its dogma on everyone. Certainly some Muslims will be offended by such statements, but frankly, so what? Judaism and Christianity, the worldâs two other major monotheistic religions, have had to face the harshest of scrutiny and criticism for several hundred years which continues to this day. Islam must not be granted any special privileges or be exempt from such treatment â the implications are of tremendous importance.
Here is a recent statement from a group of Bangladeshi apostates living in the UK explaining the reasons why they have abandoned Islam:
“One who claims to be a messenger of God is expected to live a saintly life. He must not be given to lust, he must not be a sexual pervert, and he must not be a rapist, a highway robber, a war criminal, a mass murderer or an assassin. One who claims to be a messenger of God must have a superior character. He must stand above the vices of the people of his time. Yet Muhammadâs life is that of a gangster godfather. He raided merchant caravans, looted innocent people, massacred entire male populations and enslaved the women and children. He raped the women captured in war after killing their husbands and told his followers that it is okay to have sex with their captives (Qur’an 33:50). He assassinated those who criticized him and executed them when he came to power and became de facto despot of Arabia. Muhammad was bereft of human compassion. He was an obsessed man with his dreams of grandiosity and could not forgive those who stood in his way…
The statement continues,
Muhammad was a narcissist, like Hitler, Saddam or Stalin. He was astute and knew how to manipulate people, but his emotional intelligence was less evolved than that of a 6-year-old child. He simply could not feel the pain of others. He brutally massacred thousands of innocent people and pillaged their wealth. His ambitions were big and as a narcissist he honestly believed he is entitled to do as he pleased and commit all sorts of crimes and his evil deeds are justified.”
http://www.faithfreedom.org/
Tiredofstupid says
I like the way you think on this.. Keep telling it like it is!!!
Linde Barrera says
To Saleem Smith- I always enjoy reading your posts and I think you are very brave to state you are an ex-Muslim. So here is my question to you and anyone who can offer an honest, truthful answer. You eloquently outlined the core texts of the Quran that pose a direct threat to any human who is “on the other side” aka non-Muslims. Now I went to a website called thefreedictionary.com and asked a question about what is illegal in the US under Criminal Law. This is the answer I got: “A body of rules and statutes that defines conduct prohibited by the government because it threatens and harms public safety and welfare, and that establishes punishment to be imposed for the commission of such acts.” So knowing this, WHY CAN’T ISLAM BE OUTLAWED IN THE US? It fits the definition given above.
Keith Jordan says
I think it’s because the Liberals believe that all religions must be considered equal, regardless of what they do.
Linde Barrera says
To Keith Jordan- You are most likely correct. So now is the time to start defining what is “religion” and making a distinction between that which falls within the definition and that which is not. Core texts and doctrines would be the standard used. Not sentimental drivel, holidays, costumes, customs, dietary restrictions, “holy” places.
voegelinian says
Yes, Islam is illegalde jure in America â indeed, Islam is illegal de jure in every Western country (and in most non-Western countries). So if thatâs the case, why isnât Islam illegal de facto in America and the West and the Rest?
Well, this simple fact is overwhelmingly obscured by two giant factors, one Islamic, the other Western.
1) On the Islamic side, we have
a) an ostensible diversity caused not by anything benign, but caused only by the internal incoherence, corruption and disease of Islamic culture (the core of it all being the fanatical obsession with âpurityâ and its flip side, the fanatical paranoia & hatred of âimpurityâ and âenemiesâ);
and
b) a culture of deception whereby, whenever they feel they need to because of their relative weakness with respect to their perennial âenemiesâ in any given circumstance, Muslims will lie about the fundamental unity of hatred and violence and fanaticism in Islam that renders all the diversity irrelevant, and of course will lie about how âdiverseâ Islam is (how many times have we seen Muslim apologists claim that âthere is no one single Sharia, itâs too diverse to pin downâ etc.).
2) On the Western side, we have a dominant perspective (PC MC) that feels the need to give Muslims the benefit of the doubt and make sweeping assumptions in favor of Muslims, primarily because PC MC semi-consciously associates Muslims with non-white race and non-Western culture â two things that all white Westerners are profoundly obliged to respect, on pain of the worst crime of all: âbigotryâ (in sneer quotes, to denote a false, Orwellian bigotry, and thus to distinguish it from actual bigotry which should be eschewed by all good people). Because of this powerful psychological and cultural need most Westerners have, they have constructed a second Islam (what I have called a âHolograph of Islamâ) which is an artificial fantasy Islam of peace, love, cultural & ethnic sugar & spice & everything nice. They try their damndest, of course, to make this second Islam the normative Islam, while marginalizing the other Islam (the real Islam) as âextremistâ or âfundamentalistâ or âtraditionalistâ, followed only by a Tiny Minority of Extremists.
Or, sometimes these Westerners (who abound all around us) will incoherently add on another idea: There is no Islam per se â there is no single Islam, there is only a world-wide âdiversityâ of so many Islams, we canât pin any single one of these down as the inspirational mainstay of Muslims, so that we may then assess it and render our judgment on whether itâs good or bad. Or, to add even more incoherence to the mix, these Westerners will often promote a flaming double standard: they will condemn any analysis that would âtar all Muslims with a broad brushâ and that would assume that âIslam is monolithicâ â then they turn around and with the same breath they will contradict this relativism by sweepingly assuming that the vast majority of 1.3 billion Muslims worldwide are benign, and so too is their Islam.
Thus, what should be immediately illegal â Islam, the whole Islam, and nothing but Islam, Islam, the whole kit & caboodle â becomes in the West a shimmering tapestry of ethnic & multi-cultural diversity we must accept and respect into the fabric of our society, or be accused (as asymptotic Jihad Watch readers Angemon and Phillip Jihadski have accused me countless times, though no Jihad Watch readers seem to care or worse yet, do care enough to defend them, not my position) of racism or Nazism or both.
voegelinian says
“Yes, Islam is illegal de jure in America â indeed, Islam is illegal de jure in every Western country (and in most non-Western countries). So if thatâs the case, why isnât Islam illegal de facto in America and the West and the Rest?”
An interesting mirror-image of this fundamental disconnect between de jure and de facto (where, ideally, there should be some kind of harmony between them, sociopolitically, culturally, and psychologically) is that the internment of Japanese-Americans during WW2 by the U.S. government under the toweringly liberal president Franklin Delano Roosevelt was (and remains) perfectly legal de jure — and for a time was also perfectly legal de facto in the culture and minds of the overwhelming majority of Americans. But something happened in the intervening decades — a complex process (not all bad, by any means) whereby PC MC has become increasingly dominant, mainstream, and fashionable — such that internment of Japanese-Americans is now overwhelmingly illegal and immoral de facto , virtually completely canceling out the fact that it remains legal de jure . This is an exquisite reversal or mirror image of the West’s de facto embrace of Islam, canceling out the fact that Islam is flamingly illegal and immoral by our own standards.
That’s how significant PC MC is. That it has the cultural and psychological ability to do this. And it couldn’t do this with the willing (albeit confused & incoherent) participation of millions and millions of Americans and Westerners in general. Even seeping into the Counter-Jihad (I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen Counter-Jihad folks in one way or another decrying the internment of Japanese-Americans in WW2.
Linde Barrera says
To Voegelinian (Vogue)- Your post about the parallel to Islam and the internment of Japanese Americans is right on point. But I think you made an error in type as to make sense, it should read “And it could NOT do this without the willing participation of millions of Americans…”
Angemon says
voegelinian posted:
“2) On the Western side, we have a dominant perspective (PC MC) that feels the need to give Muslims the benefit of the doubt and make sweeping assumptions in favor of Muslims, primarily because PC MC semi-consciously associates Muslims with non-white race and non-Western culture”
Why isn’t, then, that benefit extended to other non-Western cultures not associated with white people – Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, etc.?
Valentin says
To Voegelinian, that kind of benefit is given to Sikhs, hindus, Buddhists, and such, unless they come in conflict with Muslims which is when the leftists begin to side with the Muslims because the leftists are cowards that like to side with anything that is aggressively taboo. Why else do you think that they side with the anti white and anti boer movements in Zimbabwe and south Africa, both of which are sponsored by communists.
Linde Barrera says
To Voegelinian (Vogue)- Thank you for your 2:26 pm July 18 post to me. It was very well written and made sense, even if I don’t agree with every word. For one point, as I understand it, Sharia law is not negotiable, so there cannot be more than 1 version of it to interpret. For a second point, while Islam sports a diversity among its adherents, there is not supposed to be any diversity in Islam, as Turkey’s nasty president, Erdogan claims, because “Islam is Islam”. And whether western populations want to sugar coat Islam, or prefer Islam to certain Christian sects is secondary to making westerners realize that Islam has core doctrines unlike any other world religion that are evil and a threat to any society. And these verses I refer to must be deleted. So governments must mandate reform and elimination of these evil and threatening verses. It can be done if we have the will. As to the on-going negativity between you, Angemon and Philip Jihadski, I just don’t get it. All 3 of you are super smart and excellent writers, even though I liken your style to the German romanticists of the 19th century, whose 2 sentences made up 1 page. I would have to guess all 3 of you are “Alpha males”! Take care Vogue.
Angemon says
Linde Barrera posted:
“As to the on-going negativity between you, Angemon and Philip Jihadski, I just donât get it.”
I have a particular distaste for people who, despite claiming they’re all for discussion on the open marketplace of ideas, not only refuse to have their ideas examined in any way or fashion, but also engage in the same tactics used by totalitarian regimes to silence opponents: propaganda, bullying into silence, demonization of critics, etc.
Around a year ago, I made voeg a question. Instead of getting an answer and sparking a discussion of the merits, demerits and likelihood of the matter at hand, I found myself being demonized and lied about on unrelated threads, and recently I found out that he actually pestered people through email, telling them the same kind of crap he told other users here: that they were his friends and needed to help him and jump to his unconditional defense, no matter what. In addition to that, he made it quite clear on his blog: me and PJ were to be peer pressured into silence so he could continue to speak unhindered. If he wants to be a cult leader, he can go do it somewhere else and leave the CJ movement alone.
He also has a penchant for making petty, ill-faithed misrepresentations of the articles posted here on JW and of the people behind them. That proves that either his cognitive and analytical skills are, at best, questionable, or that he has an hidden agenda (which is my guess):
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/06/reza-aslan-claims-anti-fascist-pope-pius-xi-was-a-fascist#comment-1078602
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/05/jihadis-dont-show-up-at-phoenix-mosque-protest-so-no-one-gets-hurt/comment-page-1#comment-1245774
Voeg created a blog solely dedicated to propagate that kind of defamation of Robert Spencer, Hugh Fitzgerald other JW contributors at the time.
I won’t trust someone whom I know would stab me in the back (or spur others to stab me in the back on his behalf) to advance his agenda. I’ll keep calling him out wherever and whenever is necessary, even though I know I’ll either get no reply or something along the lines of “oh, woe is me, big meanie Angemon is being a bully and no one helps me!”.
Linde Barrera says
To Angemon- Thanks a bunch for the “down-low” between you, Philip Jihadski and Vogue. I normally would not take sides in a predicament such as this, nor would I seek to attack anyone just because one of my fellow JW commenters said I should. As to an agenda, I have none. I came to this website in Nov or Dec 2014 to the best of my recall, to learn more about Islam, which certainly does have many agendas. Truth and justice is of the utmost importance to me, and you have helped me on several occasions to learn more about the topic. Vogue has tried to help me too, except his “delivery style” is different than yours. It is a pity that such fine minds can’t “agree to disagree without animosity”. I am just glad that, while every club has a bouncer, the JW club does not — unless Robert Spencer puts his foot down! Kind regards to you, Angemon.
Angemon says
I, for one, wouldn’t ask you to take sides, Linde. Nor would I take against you if you happened to take voeg’s side on whatever matter. Whatever I happen to agree, or disagree, with you it will be based on its merits (or on personal opinion alone, depending on the matter) and not because you agreed with someone else on something unrelated.
As for the “bouncer”, from my experience, as long as people aren’t gigantic jerks, mind their language or lie all the time (particularly regarding the contributors), they’re bound to have a long stay here, even if they disagree with everything Robert Spencer, Raymond Ibrahim and the rest of the contributors write.
I hope you can continue learning to your heart’s desire and use/share your new found knowledge in real life. Also, don’t forget Reagan’s signature phrase: “Trust, but verify” – while I doubt any of the CJ regulars would willingly lie about something, we’re only human and prone to make a mistake every now and then đ
Linde Barrera says
To Angemon- You and I did disagree in April I think, about the motive of the Turkish government celebration on the same date as the Armenian Martyrs, but we were polite with each other. I think you are not just a scholar, but a gentleman, and I thank you for your kind consideration. (I have a feeling your name means “My Angel” in French. If my guess is right, that is a good moniker for you!)
voegelinian says
Yes Linde, thanks. I often get tangled up in my double negatives.
Linde Barrera says
To Voegelinian (Vogue)- I do enjoy reading your posts Vogue, it just takes me longer to read yours than most others! And as I wrote to Angemon yesterday, I write to you today; you, Angemon and Philip Jihadski must all be Alpha males! I hope that in the near future, you 3 can resolve any “personality conflicts” and give the other commenters here more honest discussions which are so vital to comprehension and evaluation of the topic of Islam, jihad, and other related subjects. Hope your weekend was sweet.
Linde Barrera says
To Voegelinian (Vogue)- I apologize for sending you the same thought twice, about the Alpha males. I re-read my comments to Angemon and to you, and I thought I had sent Angemon that thought. I still think it applies to all 3 of you however! I also see you sent me 2 other messages, which I just saw now. I am not senile (yet) but I am taking care of my nephew with Downs Syndrome and he is a sweet but low functioning person who has demands which I normally don’t have to address when he is not visiting me. I will read your new posts and get back to you if necessary.
voegelinian says
Linde,
“…even if I donât agree with every word. For one point, as I understand it, Sharia law is not negotiable, so there cannot be more than 1 version of it to interpret.”
Yes, I know that Sharia is only one thing, the fanatically Draconian law we see the so-called “extremists” enact. My point is that deceptive Muslim apologists and their Useful Idiots in the West promote the idea of multiple Sharias as a feature of the wonderful “diversity” of Islam.
voegelinian says
Linde,
“And whether western populations want to sugar coat Islam, or prefer Islam to certain Christian sects is secondary to making westerners realize that Islam has core doctrines unlike any other world religion that are evil and a threat to any society. ”
Well, the problem is, the West’s need to sugarcoat Islam is the primary impediment preventing the West from realizing the full evil and danger of Islam. So it seems your formulation is kind of putting the cart before the camel, so to speak.
voegelinian says
Linde,
Well, whether or not I and my relentless attackers (Angemon and Phillip Jihadski) are all “Alpha males” is a separate matter from which one of us is right about the particular matter I’m talking about (the problem of softness on Muslims being an important issue to discuss and adjudicate in the Counter-Jihad — rather than one which should trigger hostility and slanders of being “racist” and “nazi”, as Angemon and Phillip Jihadski would have it).
Angemon says
voegelinian posted:
“Well, whether or not I and my relentless attackers”
Where “attackers” means “critics” – “attack” is the blanket term you use to refer to criticism, in an inapt way to excuse yourself from answering it while pretending to save face.
“(Angemon and Phillip Jihadski) are all âAlpha malesâ”
I’d say that whoever refuses to face criticism head on and avoids discussing his ideas preferring, instead, to lie about others can not be an alpha male.
“rather than one which should trigger hostility and slanders of being âracistâ and ânaziâ, as Angemon and Phillip Jihadski would have it”
Because you just know what either I or PJ would have, despite all evidence to the contrary manifested on the dozens, if no hundreds, of times we told you to your face that you’re wrong about the thoughts and ideas you ascribe to us, right? Your reaction to being told to your face you’re wrong? Keep saying it somewhere else, hoping someone will believe it.
And then there’s the outright lie that I or PJ think of “softies” as “racists” or “nazis”. Like I said above, “lie about others” – voeg propaganda machine full steam ahead.
Don says
Salaam Saleem has been there and knows what he is talking about. I believe what he says.
BW022 says
If he only worked there for ten days and didn’t meet the minimum requirements to continue to work there…
Why are the minimum requirements to continue to work there different than the minimum requires to start working there?
What did they learn in those 10 days which they didn’t know prior? … and … if it was going to take ten days to learn this, why not make new employees wait until that checking was done before allowing them to work there?
cronk says
Look, he had a EE degree and is just out of school. They took a chance(and probably put him on probation) and hired him.
Judging from the description of what happened – he was fired for some reason. Whatever the reason it had to be really serious for them to do so, so quickly. They won’t say why because such info is private.
In my experience, there are only two reasons to fire a person so fast. 1) He made threats. 2) He refused to follow orders.
Neither would surprise me.
BTW a background check wouldn’t have found anything, he was basically a blank.
particolor says
He made a Mistake when He asked the Foreman “when will I learn how to make a Trigger !!” đ đ
Doug says
A lot of damage could have been done at anytime during those ten days.
Fatts says
Something we should all know about the US Attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Bill Killian.
http://www.breitbart.com/blog/2013/05/31/us-attorney-bill-killian-posting-something-mean-about-muslims-on-social-media-might-be-a-criminal-action-under-federal-civil-rights-laws/
mortimer says
The reasons for not hiring Muslims keep growing.
mortimer says
Muslims are like a box of chocolates…you never know what you’re going to get…lawfare, verbal jihad, bombing, shooting, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Hamas.
Tequila Not Taqiyya says
Where have we gone? THIS GUY is the new face of Homer Simpson??
Keith Jordan says
Why do so many Muslim criminals have a goofy look on their faces?
Godwin says
No, this guy is very handsome n he got tired of screwing American women n wanted to try the 72 virgins as promised in his religion. And this desire spurred him into action.
Cecilia Ellis says
Breaking News!
FoxNews just reported that Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez was released from Perry Nuclear Power Plant, after only ten days of employment, because . . . wait for it . . . he tested positive for drugs.
duh_swami says
It probably took 10 days to get the drug test results…Most likely he showed marijuana use. If he knew the company tested for drugs why would he seek employment there? Maybe he just figured he would get caught up with, but would make a few bucks before they fired him. Around here, you pass the drug test first and then they hire you, and some companies make you pay for the test. That weeds out some users automatically.
Cecilia Ellis says
duh_swami commented: “Around here, you pass the drug test first and then they hire you, and some companies make you pay for the test.”
They do around here as well. Guess they were fooled by his devout Muslim aura . . .
Charli Main says
Similar situation here in Britain and no doubt the rest of Europe.
The Muslim 5th column has infiltrated EVERY aspect of British society.
Muslims are in all branches of the armed services, in all branches of health care and medicine. Muslims are embedded in the education system, the police, local and national politics and all branches of the nation´s financial system.
MUSLIMS ARE EVEN ACTIVE AND EMPLOYED IN THE INTELLEGENCE SERVICES THAT ARE SUPPOSED TO PROTECT US FROM TERRORISTS !!!!!!!
underbed cat says
We have Britain beat…our insurgency is top down.(My opinion) Just the % population differ.
voegelinian says
Yes. So limiting or stopping further immigration (which likely won’t even be seriously considered for years from now, meanwhile more millions of Muslims will immigrate and be born here) won’t address this serious problem of already present infiltration.
Godwin says
So America n Europe do no not need Russia, or China as an enemy because they have their own more dangerous enemies inside their “bellies”.In the future these enemies will take over their countries n establish Sharia. And this no joke.
rcourtemanche says
With due respect to genuinely peaceful Muslims, any highly sensitive positions including governments’ especially highly sensitive ones must be prohibited to them unless their loyalty and integrity can be ascertained beyond any doubts.
duh_swami says
Where do ‘genuinely peaceful’ Mahoundians live? Do you mean the elusive ‘moderates’ we hear about, but no one can find?
Pat says
While I was an ER RN in Fl. For 28 yrs., I would look to see what my pts. did for their âoccupationâ, as I might get clues about what injuries, or illnesses they had, because of occupational exposures and dangers. I noticed, over time, that many Muslims were in jobs with the state, such as water, power, roads, communication, ports, including airports, etc., as engineers or other technical posts. While it might simply be coincidence, after reading âthe Grand Jihadâ, and seeing this article, it makes me wonder, are they, or are some of them, âsleeper cellsâ?
Look at how successful the communists were doing this, taking over our schools, unions, etc. Now we have communists, Maoists, Islamists in our WH.
Just because he wasnât on the FBIâs âwatch listâ, clearly means NOTHING.
Valentin says
In the high school I went to in a run down area of St. Paul Minnesota a very kind black girl came up to me and told me that she was scared for her uncle who was mentally retarded or unstable because a Iranian woman was taking advantage of him and living with him and the girl told me that the woman had a box that was full to the brim with credit cards. I have no doubt that there are many sleeper cells, informants, and jihadis that use America as their base. The Minnesota Somalis that were involved in the Kenyan mall is proof alone that American Muslims are not shy about a global caliphate. My brother saw a Muslim get into fight with someone at a fireworks show on independence day because the Muslim was blocking peoples view, and he said something along the lines of “Isis will take over America, fuck your independence day”.