And AP stokes the hatred of Israel with its defamatory headline, “Israeli police enter Jerusalem holy site, block Arab youths,” as if the police were acting gratuitously, and not in response to “Palestinian” jihad activity.
“Israeli police enter Jerusalem holy site, block Arab youths,” Associated Press, July 26, 2015 (thanks to Pamela Geller):
JERUSALEM (AP) — Israeli police entered a holy Jerusalem site on Sunday to prevent Arab youths from attacking visiting Jews marking a biblical holiday, a police spokesman said.
Micky Rosenfeld said police received prior warnings that masked Arab youths were barricading themselves inside the al-Aqsa Mosque armed with rocks and fire bombs. He said the youths planned to attack Jews visiting the area Sunday for Tisha B’Av – the Jewish holiday marking the destruction of ancient Hebrew temples.
Rosenfeld said some officers were wounded as they pushed the youths back, without providing further details….
Jay Boo says
THE HOAX
Muslims invaded Jerusalem and now make claim in the same way a dog marks newly visited territory.
Muhammad has absolutely nothing to do with Jerusalem.
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
Wasn’t the original Quibla pointed at Jerusalem? I think the Holy Prophet was a frustrated Jew. Like when Adolph went off the deep end after getting his rejection letter from the Vienna Academy of Arts, the Holy Prophet didn’t take it too well when the Jews declined to fall in behind his vision of the angry Allah who was furiously angry at the religious bungling of the Jews. So he repdirected the Qibla to point at Mecca, and named his new god after a popular rock god named Allah that sat in stony silence on a shelf in the Kaaba, then a tourist trap owned by his uncle.
Check that, Allah didn’t sit in stony silence on the shelf, he *was* a rock on the shelf.
cs says
Yes, I think so.
Jay Boo says
You prove my point APG
Flying horse Muhammad turned his back on Jerusalem as his personal stepping stone when he no longer felt the need just as he turned his back on Allah momentarily to recite the satanic verses of the Koran.
Muslims have no claim to Jerusalem. They are uninvited occupiers.
Charli Main says
Not only Jerusalem but the whole of Palestine. The Muslim vermin from Saudi Arabia invaded Palestine around 634 AD, massacred the indigenous Christian and Jewish inhabitants and Voila !!!! Palestine becomes Muslim land and the Jews and Christians ARE ILLEGALLY OCCUPING THEIR MUSLIM LAND.
The time is not far away, when Americans and Europeans will be ILLEGALLY OCCUPING MUSLIM LAND and the holy muslim sites of Westminster Abby and Canterbury Cathedral.
Angemon says
That’s pretty much how any given muslim-majority country came to be a muslim-majority country.
particolor says
Muslims caught with Rocks will have them Removed !
Larry A. Singleton says
The Prophet Muhammad’s ‘Night Journey’ was Not to Jerusalem but to Medina by Ahmad Muhammad ‘Arafa
http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/941.htm
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
AP stokes the hatred of Israel with its defamatory headline…
I remember a few years back a segment on ABC News showing some dumbass foreign correspondent standing in Jerusalem with a span of the Wall in the backdrop. He went on to “report” on the segregation of Moslems in the West Bank on the other side of the Wall from Israeli Jews on the front side. He went on to “report” that some observers decried the Wall as a manifestation of apartheid, with no mention of the *fact* that the Jews put up the Wall after a long series of bloody Jew mass murder operations by Moslems coming through checkpoints before the Wall was built, and also no mention of the *fact* that hundreds of thousands of Moslems were living peacefully on the Jew side of the Wall.
Guess the potential Pulitzer Prize winner just didn’t have enough airtime to account for those salient facts.
IQ al Rassooli says
As I have asserted and PROVED on numerous occasions that Muhammad’s Quran & Hadith SELF DESTRUCT through their outrageous LIES as I shall prove in the following~
Isra is the name of Surah 17 which is also called Bani Isra’il, (The Children of Israel). It is the alleged Nocturnal Journey from Mecca to the Farthest Mosque mentioned in:
17:1 “Glory to (Allah) Who did take His Servant for journey [Asra/Travel] by night from the Sacred Mosque [Masjid al Haram] to the Farthest Mosque [Masjid al Aqsa] …”
Even the obvious should be pointed out to the reader, that the name of JERUSALEM is NOT ONCE mentioned anywhere in the Quran or Hadiths.
Jerusalem, on the other hand, is mentioned at least 667 times in the Bible.
The explanation of this Aya/Verse is found first and foremost in the ONLY biography of Muhammad written by Muhammad Ibn Ishaq in his book Sirat Rassool Allah.
He informs us with great honesty, on the authority of Muhammad’s premier wife Aisha, that his body never left her side and that he was only transported spiritually.
This is corroborated by the Qarawiyun Library Manuscript in Fez, Morocco, where it repeats that Aisha the Prophet’s wife and most intimate companion of his later years, declared emphatically that
“he was transported in his spirit (bi-ruhihi), while his body did not leave its place”
Also, the great Al-Hasan al-Basri, who belonged to the next generation, held uncompromisingly to the same view.
In another version in (section 267 p 184), it is Hind, Umm Hani daughter of Abu Talib, Muhammad’s cousin and sister of Ali that relates concerning the Night Journey:
“The apostle went on NO Night Journey except while he was in my house. He slept that night in my house. He prayed the final night prayer and he slept and we slept there. ….”
A few traditions assert that this may have been a PHYSICAL ascent, as affirmed by:
Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 5.228 Narrated by Ibn Abbas
The sights which Allah’s Apostle was shown on the Night Journey when he was taken to Bait-ul-Maqdis (i.e. Jerusalem) were actual sights, (not dreams). And the Cursed Tree (mentioned) in the Qur’an is the tree of Zaqqum (itself).
Whose version should one trust, that of the wife who slept with him or of his companions who were not present?
Neither the Quran – which did not allow for a single miracle to be performed – nor Muhammad, ever declared that it was a miracle.
The most damning and damaging evidence against this concocted story is the historical and incontrovertible fact, that there was no Masjid (Mosque) or Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem at the time of Muhammad, since this Temple had already been destroyed by the Romans at least 580 years earlier; hence the verse could not possibly and realistically have meant Jerusalem.
Hence Muhammad LIED and deceived his ignorant, superstitious and trusting followers. His current followers are continuing this egregious charade.
It was the companions of Muhammad who, after his death, expressed the erroneous, falsified and unsubstantiated opinion, and later the dogma by creating a MYTHOLOGY assuming a real physical transport to Jerusalem, in spite of the fact, that not one of the Ahadith above, mentions any intermediate ‘landing’ at Jerusalem but a direct ‘flight’ from Mecca to the first Heaven only.
Cecilia Ellis says
IQ, what an absolutely superb proof! Love it! For me, it’s a keeper! Well done!
Larry A. Singleton says
Slavery, Terrorism and Islam by Peter Hammond. This is a GREAT reference book.
Speaking of Bukhari:
Questions for Muslims 12-25-14 (Edited 5-16-15)
Part I
“What the horn is to the rhinoceros, what the sting is to the wasp, the Mohammedan faith is to the Arabs of the Sudan-a faculty of offence. All the warlike operations of Mohammedan peoples are characterised by fanatacism” Winston Churchill
“An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last. Victory will never be found by taking the line of least resistance.” Winston Churchill
“While Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Parsees and Jews, along with several million adherents of an animistic religion, all coexisted in relative harmony, one religion that would not accept compromise stood out from the rest: Islam.” Mahatma Gandhi
About three years ago I ordered some reading material, including Taha’s “Second Message”, and a “study” Koran to find out what this “Islam thing” was all about. When I was sixteen I was chanting nam yo ho renge kyo to a piece of paper, (gahonzen?), having NO idea what I was doing. A few years later, hair down to my ass and a knapsack on my back, I hitchhiked cross country, got saved in Nashville Tenn. and went to live on a Christian farm in Mansfield Ohio. (Not the prison.) My gra’mom called me a “seeker”. As I said, there came a time recently when I wanted to understand this “religion of peace”. It was Humaid’s article on jihad I found in my Summarized Bukhari that decided “things” for me.
Jihad in the Qur’an and Sunnah by Sheikh Abdullâh bin Muhammad bin Humaid (I had two links to this article that no longer work. In any case, Google it. It should be easy to find. Also check out the publisher Dar-us-Salam and sinister general manager of “Sound Vision” Abdul Malik Mujahid who personally plugs this article.)
“we may describe it, (jihad), as a surgeon’s lancet and not a butcher’s knife.” Mahmoud Mohammed Taha (I’m sure there are about 200 million dead people that would disagree with him. And this from the guy who’s been called the Mahatma Ghandi of Islam.)
Question for Muslims:
Explain this articles prominence, and significance almost as an
“Introduction”, in a book, my Summarized Sahih Al-Bukhari, and tell me….
….WHY, out of all the articles, out of all the words of pearly Muslim poetry and wisdom the publishers could have put in this, “the most authentic and true among the books of the Prophet”, this article on JIHAD is the one they chose?
Also
If Islam is the “religion of peace”, where in Sheikh Abdullah bin Humaid’s article on jihad can I find the equivalent of “Love Thy Neighbor” and “good will toward men”?
Compare Humaid’s “jihad” and Emmet Fox’ Sermon on the Mount and tell me which one best represents a spirit of Love and “compassion”
Also address “jihad” as it’s defined in Reliance of the Traveller and answer the same question. (Chapter O-9.0: Jihad O: “Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion.”) And explain why the “greater” jihad is only mentioned once here and never seen again in this “Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law”.
I’ve posted this hundreds of times to many Muslims and have yet to get a single response. Well, I did receive a response from some goofball named “Dr.” Mohsen El-Guindy asking me to read his books. Instead I downloaded a bunch of his articles. Which were pure rants. An Imam, sidestepped it by telling me I had to “study Islam” to gain a greater understanding. I’ll read Andrew Bostom instead.
Cecilia Ellis says
Larry, is your book, “Summarized Sahih Al-Bukhari” the same book as “The Translation of the Meanings of Summarized Sahih Al-Bukhari: Arabic-English”?
cs says
you should all watch this videos, if you did not already.
Culture of vitimihood and jihad under cover.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-wDRtSkY4g
dumbledoresarmy says
Australia’s ABC ran this story with an even nastier and grovellingly-Islamophile headline than the one that AP produced.
Here it is.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-07-27/palestinians-israeli-police-clash-at-jerusalem-al-aqsa-mosque/6649698
“Palestinians, Israeli police clash at Jerusalem’s al-Aqsa mosque compound”
Observe? – The ABC, relying on Reuters and the AFP, has “disappeared” the Temple Mount altogether. There is NO ‘Temple Mount’. There is just “the Al Aqsa mosque compound’.
Here are the first two paragraphs:
“Palestinian Muslim worshippers and Israeli police clashed at Jerusalem’s al-Aqsa mosque compound on Sunday, on the annual Jewish day of mourning for the Holy City’s two destroyed Biblical temples.
“No serious injuries were reported at the site, which lies in the Israeli-occupied walled Old City and is revered by Muslims as the Noble Sanctuary and by Jews as the Temple Mount where two temples once stood.”
Observe that the Muslim claim is described first and the Jewish claim second; and that they are placed on exactly an equal basis, as if of equal validity – or with the Muslim claim being prior and of greater validity – whereas, of course, the Musilm religious claim is purely fictional, invented after a violent Muslim conquest, with *the* Muslim sacred site somewhere else entirely, to boot; whereas both the First and Second Temples are historical FACT and this is *the* sacred site for Jews (irrespective of whether a person believes that the God of Israel exists or not, the reality is, the Temple Mount is and has been for centuries – MANY centuries *preceding* the invention of Islam – *the* central Jewish sacred site that is for Jews exactly as Lhasa is for Tibetan Buddhists and Varanasi for Hindus).
The whole article is grovelingly subservient to the Muslim imperialist narrative and viciously belittling of the ancient and centuries-prior Jewish attachment to the Temple Mount and to Jerusalem.
It made me so angry that I really have to write a letter to the ABC’s Head Office to complain about slanted and biased – and viciously antisemitic, to boot – coverage. There was no necessity whatsoever for them to peddle the OIC/ Reuters/ AFP line. And of course at the end they trot out the usual rubbish about the ” West Bank’. That is: the region that for millennia was known as Judea and Samaria. JUDEA and Samaria. Jesus wasn’t born in “Bethlehem in the West Bank” or “Bethlehem in Palestine”. He was born “in Bethlehem in Judaea”. That’s how the Gospel writers thought of it.
I would encourage my fellow Aussie jihadwatchers to do the same. Let’s start telling our media what’s what, every time they produce this kind of nonsense.