Not only do recent revelations concerning the endemic sexual grooming of British girls by Muslim men demonstrate how crippling political correctness is, but they show how political correctness complements the most abusive elements of Islamic law, or Sharia.
According to a June 24 report by the Birmingham Mail, as far back as March 2010, West Midlands Police knew that Muslim grooming gangs “were targeting children outside schools across the city—but failed to make the threat public.”
A confidential report obtained under a Freedom of Information Act indicates that police were well aware that British pupils were being targeted by mostly Muslim men. Several passages from the report make this clear:
In one heavily redacted passage, entitled ‘Schools’, it states: “In (redacted) a teacher at a (redacted) that a group of Asian males were approaching pupils at the school gate and grooming them. Strong anecdotal evidence shows this MO (modus operandi) is being used across the force.”
The 2010 report also reveals how these “Asian” gangs used victims to target other girls. For example, by using “a young girl in a children’s home to target and groom other residents on their behalf…. The girl’s motivation to recruit new victims is often that the provision of new girls provides her a way to escape the cycle of abuse.”
Other victims were systematically “forced into prostitution and high levels of intimidation and force are used to keep the victims compliant.”
Although police knew all this, the Birmingham Mail said it “is unaware of any police public appeals or warnings from that time”—appeals and warnings that no doubt would have saved many girls from the Islamic sex rings.
So what paralyzed police from any action, even warnings to the community? The report sheds light:
The predominant offender profile of Pakistani Muslim males… combined with the predominant victim profile of white females has the potential to cause significant community tensions…. There is a potential for a backlash against the vast majority of law abiding citizens from Asian/Pakistani communities from other members of the community believing their children have been exploited.
Once again, then, political correctness—this time under the pretext of fear of a “backlash”—was enough to paralyze the police from arresting Muslim sex predators and releasing their victims.
And what if a “backlash” were to occur? Why is it okay for innocent children to be plied with drugs and passed around in kabob shops and taxicabs while police standby—but it’s not okay for the so-called “majority of law abiding citizens from Asian/Pakistani communities” to ever experience anything negative?
Maybe if they did, they’d actually reign in the sexual predators of their community—some of whom are, in fact, “pillars of their community.” Maybe they’d implore their imams in the UK—the majority of whom reportedlypromote the sexual grooming of “infidel” children—to change their tune.
In reality, the great fear is that a backlash would demonstrate once and for all that multiculturalism—especially in the context of Islam—is an abysmal failure; it would be an admittance that even the West is part of the “real world,” one full of ugly truths that must be combatted, not merely “understood” or appeased.
Better sacrifice some British kids on the altar of multiculturalism than overturn the altar altogether… Keep reading
ICH says
BRITAIN PLEASE WAKE UP !!!
I moved to Canada at a young age.
Relatives visiting the UK all say the same things.
They dont mention castles , history, Beatles Museum…etc etc
They all say UK IS FULL OF !@#$ !@#$%^&*&
I will let you fill in the blanks.
What a shame.
I have heard the cockney dialect is dyeing. Jamaifran is taking over
in London area.
Katnis says
I see more and more in the U.S. It’s disturbing. It wasn’t like this when I was growing up. I long for the good old days when a muti- cultural blend seemed interesting instead of scary.
jayell says
There’s a soap opera on BBC TV called ‘Eastenders’. Most of the characters in it are proper ‘English’ people with cockney accents. It was probably a fairly accurate portrayal of the local demographics 30 or more so years ago when the programme first started but you take a walk around Stepney/Tower Hamlets area that is supposed to be the basis of the fictitious ‘Walford, E20’ these days and you’ll need your passport. (BTW, the ‘E20’ postcode was entirely fictitious when the programme started, but the authorities actually had to use it for the Olympic Park – which is nothing whatever like the ‘good old’ East End – when it was English, that is).
Taking Mr. Ibrahim’s title for this piece, ‘UK Police Knew and Did Nothing to Protect Girls from Muslim Predators’, isn’t it strange how the Police apparently found time to hound UK celebrities for sins that paled into insiginificance – assuming there were any sins at all – compared with the utter obscenities committed by these muslims? But then, the Establishment for some reason wanted a smokescreen to protect either these mohammedan monsters, or the negligent Police, or both. Or probably the police negligence was part of the whole repulsive debacle.
Katnis says
Disgusting, ugly, sick people.
It’s hard to grasp that this is really happening.
mortimer says
Pakistanis are the greatest users of pornography and in particular of the most degraded and sick forms of pornography.
They should not be admitted to civilized countries.
William says
Britain is a hollowed out dead carcass. The innards have nearly completely rotted out. The shell or outward form that we see is nearly all what we see. Unfortunately, the innards in America and the West are experiencing the same hollowing out; the place where the soul once resided is being gutted. Soon, there will be no their there anymore. We are all infected with the same canker, only in different degrees of decomposition. Is there an anti-infective out there that we can use to halt the ongoing putrefaction before it is too late for us also?
John Hartley says
I fully support multiculturism. This country has benefitted greatly from people from all over the world coming to the UK to live and work. However, I will not tolerate the import of an ideology that seeks to infiltrate and eventually supplant our own laws and traditions. Therefore I am completely opposed to Islam. Unfortunately, it seems that gullible politicians, seeing many muslims as being peaceful and law-abiding, therefore assume that Islam is a benign religion. The reality is that muslims in this country practise what I would call ‘Islam light’, whereby they ignore the Koranic verses espousing violence, but this of course may only be temporary. The leader of ISIS holds a doctorate in Islamic theology and he, rightly, states that ISIS is emulating the prophet Mohammed who overcame Arabia in ten years by means of terror.
Neil Jennison says
“”I fully support multiculturism. This country has benefitted greatly from people from all over the world coming to the UK to live and work.””
It seems to me you are confusing multiculturalism with immigration. Controlled immigration has a noble tradition in the UK. But generally, these immigrants have within a generation or so become integrated into British society. Yes, they may well have added to our culture in the process. The one culture changes slowly and manageably. Multiculturalism is about importing immigrant communities and their culture wholesale and having these new cultures existing alongside the indigenous culture. Usually with state support for their traditions at the expence of ours, which is divisive.
Your points about Islam hit the nail squarely on the head though. Islam as a religio-political philosophy has no intention of integration and is only interested in taking over and the implementation of Sharia.
jayell says
No, ‘multiculturalism’ is a nonsense resulting from the totally cowardly and unprincipled failure of leaders or influential persons in a society to insist that the standards of that society, or group of people, are upheld. Even more ridiculous is the term ‘multicultural society’ which is just about the most brainless contrived oxymoron imaginable.
A ‘society’ is (and always has) been undertsood to be essentially a basically unified group of people with a common aim or/and set of beliefs and a fairly clearly defined common identity, so that they all identify and relate closely with each other and intuitively conform to a common set of principles of public and private behaviour and attitudes. This would mean that there would be a relatively high level of interpersonal respect, which would translate into a relatively high level of respect for the law and the rights of others, which would in turn mean a relatively low level of crime; and, due to its high level of self-regulation, there would be little need for anything like oppressive policing, since the police would be seen and trusted as the protecting agents of the social order to which all subscribe and with whom everyone might therefore easily identify (so long as they’re law-abiding!). Such a society would be well-balanced and highly productive therefore highly efficient, since relatively few resources would have to be wasted on maintaining, or attempting to maintain, its necessary social integrity and natural cohesion. This is all really stating the blindingly obvious.
As a UK citizen I think what I have described is the UK as it WAS up to, say, 60 years ago. NOT as it is now. I think everyone knows what might have caused the change, but PLEASE NOTE that I have only referred to people’s beliefs, behaviour and attitudes, not necessarily where they might originally come from, which is quite immaterial so long everyone knows and honours the fact that that they must basically ‘sing from the same (standard issue) hymn sheet’ and ‘keep in tune’ with the rest. Just like if you join a club, or society, or company, you respect its aims and fellow employees/members, obey its rules and DON’T just turn up to use (or abuse) its cheap bar and gym facillties or otherwise assume that you can simply do exactly as you please. The trouble with the West these days is we have given out membership cards to those who really couldn’t give a damn about any of this and seem to think that they CAN just ‘do exactly as they please’ and ‘to hell with everyone else’ (and THAT might as well be a well-known quote from a placard at a muslim demonstration).
I think that probably just about summed up why we’re all in a mess.
Angemon says
A backlash that never seems to materialize in any given Western country. There was no backlash after 9/11, 7/7, 11-M, Boston, Fort Hood or Lee Rigby. Compare that to what happens, for example, in Pakistan if a non-muslim is suspected of blasphemy.
Can you imagine if news came out in Pakistan that British expats were doing do muslim girls what (mostly) Pakistani muslims did in Great Britain to British girls? There would be riots on the streets and probably a bloodbath not limited to British expats alone.
nicu says
same shit everywhere : victims are nothing and aggressors get protected as long as you are political correct and no racist :(((((((((((
Matthieu Baudin says
Thank you Raymond Ibrahim for keeping this in the spotlight.
This particular travesty will not be swept aside and ignored. Individuals are responsible for their actions and lawful conduct. What began as a push for ‘cultural sensitivity’ in recent decades has ballooned out of control and delivered, by default, a two tiered legal system.
Another area in which we see a blatent case of inequality before the law, ushered in by over the top cultural sensitivity, regards female circumcision – removal of the clitoris of young girls.
This cruel and extremely violent form of sexual abuse of youngsters is not being pursued, specifically because it occurs almost solely within Moslem households. Yet, on the other hand, swift action and intervention will occur at the very hint of sexual interference of minors when it involves anyone else.
alyn21 says
Muslims are a protected minority in Britain. The media bends over backwards to portray them in as positive a way as possible in spite of the facts to the contrary.
I recently watched an old news show online that asked if free speech in Britain allowed people to say offensive things about Islam.
This show took place after the Danish cartoons of Mohammed were published and all of the fuss it created.
The host of the show had copies of the Danish cartoons and said they would be shown but only after the audience voted on whether or not to show them. The audience voted 60% to 40% in favor of showing them but the host ignored the results and said that since the cartoons had nothing to contribute to the debate they would not be shown.
Here is a small example of how the media in a western country now controls the narrative all in favor of Islam.
Tom says
English Police?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/jun/10/race.topstories3
Secret report brands Muslim police corrupt
Fury over internal Met study which says Asians need special training
Sandra Laville and Hugh Muir
The Guardian, Saturday 10 June 2006
A secret high-level Metropolitan police report has concluded that Muslim officers are more likely to become corrupt than white officers because of their cultural and family backgrounds.
—
Pakistanis?
https://www.google.de/search?q=95%25+pakistan+truck+drivers&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=CDWXVajBA4v9UPu2oNgJ
95% of P. Truck Drivers say they have sex with their joung helper boys!
Ian_A_S says
A very good article that pulls together a lot of evidence about the modern British state was written a while ago by Hal Colebatch:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/thought-police-muscle-up-in-britain/story-e6frg6zo-1225700363959
It starts –
“BRITAIN appears to be evolving into the first modern soft totalitarian state. As a sometime teacher of political science and international law, I do not use the term totalitarian loosely. ”
and further on –
“In the past 10 years I have collected reports of many instances of draconian punishments, including the arrest and criminal prosecution of children, for thought-crimes and offences against political correctness.”
Have a read, you will begin to understand why the UK is an ideal forward operations base for the Islamisation of Europe. Political correctness + No free speech = Islam thrives.
Angemon says
Ian_A_S posted:
“A very good article that pulls together a lot of evidence about the modern British state was written a while ago by Hal Colebatch:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/thought-police-muscle-up-in-britain/story-e6frg6zo-1225700363959”
From that article:
That’s in the same vein of what Fredrik Reinfeldt, Swedish Prime Minister from 2006 to 2014 and (supposedly) conservative said in ’06: that the native Swedish culture was merely barbarism and everything good was imported from abroad.
Ian_A_S says
Yes, it is Western guilt again.